Abstract
Background
Refractory migraine is a challenging condition with great impact on health related quality of life. Intravenous (IV) ketamine has been previously used to treat various refractory pain conditions. We present a series of patients with refractory migraine treated with intravenous ketamine in the hospital setting.
Methods
Based on retrospective chart review, we identified six patients with refractory migraine admitted from 2010 through 2014 for treatment with intravenous ketamine. Ketamine was administered using a standard protocol starting with a dose of 0.1 mg/kg/hr and increased by 0.1 mg/kg/hr every 3 to 4 h as tolerated until the target pain score of 3/10 was achieved and maintained for at least 8 h. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at time of hospital admission were obtained as well as average baseline VAS scores prior to ketamine infusion. A phone interview was conducted for follow-up of migraine response in the 3 to 6 months following ketamine infusion.
Results
The study sample had a median age of 36.5 years (range 29–54) and 83% were women. Pre-treatment pain scores ranged from 9 to 10. All patients achieved a target pain level of 3 or less for 8 h; the average ketamine infusion rate at target was 0.34 mg/kg/hour (range 0.12–0.42 mg/kg/hr). One patient reported a transient out-of-body hallucination following an increase in the infusion rate, which resolved after decreasing the rate. There were no other significant side effects.
Conclusion
IV ketamine was safely administered in the hospital setting to patients with refractory chronic migraine. Treatment was associated with short term improvement in pain severity in 6 of 6 patients with refractory chronic migraine. Prospective placebo-controlled trials are needed to assess short term and long-term efficacy of IV ketamine in refractory chronic migraine.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s10194-016-0700-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Background
Chronic migraine and refractory migraine have long challenged clinicians. In the United States, chronic migraine prevalence is nearly 1% and results in enormous impact on headache-related disability, including higher Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS), reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL), increased depression and anxiety (PHQ-4 and GAD-7 respectively), compared to episodic migraine [1–6]. Chronic migraine has also been shown to result in greater economic burden and health care resource utilization [1, 3, 7–9]. Annually, the total economic cost of chronic migraine is over three time that of episodic migraine, when consider direct medical costs and loss from decreased productivity [8].
Refractory migraine is included in ICHD-2 [10] and ICHD-3 beta [11] but criteria for intractable headache have only recently emerged [12]. Silberstein et al. [12] assesses the type and number of treatments the patient failed as well as the clinical setting and the intensity of invention for intractable headache. Multiple treatment options have been proposed for management of refractory migraine including intravenous dihydroergotamine (DHE) and intravenous divalproex sodium [13, 14].
One candidate treatment for intractable migraine is ketamine. Intravenous ketamine has been studied in various refractory pain conditions including complex regional pain [15]. Intranasal ketamine reduced the severity of aura in migraine with prolonged aura in a small randomized trial [16]. The use of intravenous ketamine has only been reported in case series. Krusz et al. [17] demonstrated improvement in pain scores in patients with refractory migraine as well as few side effects associated with treatment.
Ketamine is a dissociative anesthetic that acts on glutamate binding sites at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor as well as at opioid, monoaminergic, cholinergic, nicotinic, and muscarinic receptors [18]. There is a theory of functional and electrophysiological dissociation between thalamo-neocortical and limbic systems: sensory inputs may reach cortical receiving areas, but fail to be observed in some of the association areas with the use of ketamine [18]. Analysis of the dose-dependent ketamine effects on pain processing showed a decreasing activation of the secondary somatosensory cortex, insula, and anterior cingulate cortex, which has been linked to the affective pain component that underlines the potency of ketamine in modulating affective pain processing [19]. This theoretical mechanism of action of ketamine has shown to decrease central sensitization and allodynia in pain conditions, which has motived clinicians to use it as treatment for migraine. Ketamine also reduces cortical spreading depression in animal models [20]. Most common known side effects of ketamine may include cardiovascular instability, respiratory changes and psychiatric symptoms including acute psychosis, hallucinations, anxiety but are usually dose-dependent.
Herein, we report the effect of IV ketamine on a series of six patients with intractable migraine treated with escalated doses on an inpatient basis.
Methods
We performed a retrospective chart review study. From 2010 until 2014, a total of six patients were admitted for treatment with continuous intravenous ketamine to Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital in New York. Data were collected from charts obtained from the medical record department and electronic medical records (PRISM). The study was approved by the Mount Sinai Institutional Review Board. Prior to admission, a diagnosis of chronic migraine without aura based on ICHD-2 criteria was made by a headache specialist (Sait Ashina). Demographics, number of prior migraine treatments and current use of medications such as opioids, antidepressants, beta blockers, antiepileptic medications and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were documented, as well as onset age of migraine diagnosis.
All the patients received information regarding side effects and risks associated with the treatment and informed written consent was obtained prior to infusion. Monitoring of the treatment was done according to the ketamine infusion procedure policy of the Department of Pain Medicine and Palliative Care at Mount Sinai Beth Israel (see Additional file 1 for sources used in protocol development). Following an initial electrocardiogram (EKG) for all patients and a pregnancy test for female patients, ketamine was administered using a standard protocol starting with an initial intravenous infusion of 0.1 mg/kg/hr. The infusion was increased by 0.1 mg/kg/hr every 3 to 4 h as tolerated until the goal pain score of 3/10 was maintained for 8 h. The eight-hour designation was made based on standard pain assessment intervals in the institution. Thereafter, the infusion was decreased by 0.2 mg/kg/hr every 3to 4 h until the infusion rate reached 0 mg/kg/hr. The dose of ketamine escalated as needed until maximal response or until undesirable side effects including psychomimetic and dysphoric effects.
Visual Analogue scale (VAS) score was used at the moment of admission and follow-up VAS scores at different ketamine infusion rates were assessed from nursing and infusion records. We defined a pain response as a reduction in the initial VAS to a score of three or less. Side effects were identified and reported.
We attempted to contact the patients in this retrospective study for telephone follow-up; however, we were only able to reach two of the six patients. During telephone interview, a questionnaire including MIDAS [21] was administered.
Results
Characteristics of patients admitted for ketamine are summarized in Table 1. Ages ranged from 29 to 54 (median of 36.5) and five out of six were women. VAS scores on admission were nine or ten (see Table 1). All of the patients were Caucasian. The median age of migraine onset was 17 (range 8–29). The median duration of illness was 17 years (range 12–46). The mean number of failed acute migraine treatments was 18 (range 14–26) and failed preventive medications was 25 (range 7–29) (See Table 2). Three patients out of the total six receiving ketamine had a prior psychiatric diagnosis (depression, panic attacks and/or borderline personality disorders). In addition to chronic migraine, concomitant chronic pain disorders were identified in three of six patients, two of whom also had a psychiatric diagnosis. The six patients were on at least one of the following medications: muscle relaxant, NSAID, opioid, antiepileptic, antidepressant, benzodiazepine, triptan, beta blocker or antiemetic (Table 2).
Table 1.
Patient | Age/sex | Age at migraine onset | Duration of Illness | Psychiatric and Pain Comorbidities | Initial VAS | IV Ketamine Rate VAS < 3 | Time to maintain VAS of 3 or less for duration of 8 h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 42/F | 26 | 16 years | Depression, Panic Attacks, Chronic Back Pain | 10 | 0.42 mg/kg/hr | 36 h |
2 | 29/F | 15 | 14 years | Panic Attacks | 10 | 0.38 mg/kg/hr | 40 h |
3 | 31/M | 19 | 12 years | Complex Regional Pain Syndrome | 9 | 0.41 mg/kg/hr | 20 h |
4 | 54/F | 8 | 46 years | None | 9 | 0.12 mg/kg/hr | 12 h |
5 | 30/F | 10 | 20 years | Depression, Borderline Personality Disorder, Chronic Neck Pain | 9 | 0.35 mg/kg/hr | 73 h |
6 | 47/F | 29 | 18 years | Depression | 9 | 0.34 mg/kg/hr | 82 h |
Table 2.
Patient | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Opioid | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||
Anti-depressant | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||
Muscle relaxant | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Benzodiazepine | 1 | 1 | ||||
Anti-emetic | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Neuroleptic | 2 | 1 | ||||
Anti-epileptic | 2 | 1 | ||||
Triptan | 1 | |||||
Anti-hypertensive | 1 | 1 | 1 |
All of the six patients were started on IV ketamine dose of 0.1 mg/kg/hr. All six patients achieved the target endpoint of a pain score of less than three out of ten sustained for at least 8 h. The intravenous ketamine doses are presented in Table 1. We provide the current outpatient migraine regimens at the time of admission as well as the number of acute and preventive migraine treatments failed for each patient in Tables 2 and 3. Telephone follow-up was obtained in just two patients, neither of whom reported sustained benefits from intravenous ketamine infusion. One patient reported an out of body hallucination which resolved following decrease in the infusion rate.
Table 3.
Patient | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abortive Medications Failed | 19 | NA | 16 | 14 | 18 | 26 |
Preventive Medications Failed | 25 | 5 | 17 | 28 | 23 | 29 |
OnabotulinumtoxinA Failed | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
NA not available
Discussion
In this small cases series, all six patients with refractory migraine met the target pain relief endpoint with ketamine over a mean infusion of 44 h (range 12–82). Mean ketamine infusion rate at the time of pain relief endpoint was 0.34 mg/kg/hour (range 0.12–0.42). Patients achieved pain relief without substantial adverse effects. One patient reported a brief dissociative experience, which reversed.
Intravenous ketamine use in treating refractory depression has recently been well established [22, 23]. Studies have also suggested a role for ketamine in the treatment of intractable chronic pain including long-term analgesic effect persisting beyond the duration of infusion [24]. Long-term ketamine infusion (4–14 days) has been shown to decrease pain for up to 3 months [25]. Allodynia, a marker of chronic pain and central sensitization of nociceptive pathways, has also been shown decrease with intravenous ketamine infusion. Interestingly, this effect was not achieved until 4–5 days of continuous infusion [26].
The existing literature on IV ketamine for the treatment of headache is limited. Though our case series is modest in size, and in the absence of a contemporaneous placebo group, causal inferences are not possible, we demonstrated short-term success in pain relief in intractable migraine patients with one significant but short-lived adverse event. It is biologically plausible that ketamine could be an effective treatment for intractable headache. Ketamine is an antagonist at NMDA receptors, blocking the excitatory action of glutamate (Glu), a neurotransmitter long implicated in the pathophysiology of migraine [27]. Glu has been shown to be implicated in induction of cortical spreading depression (CSD), activation of trigeminal nociceptive neurons as well as play a role in central sensitization. Previous studies have identified variants in the gene for GluA receptors in persons with migraine [28].
To date, there has been a lack of treatments with reliable abortive effect on migraine aura, the phenomenon attributed to CSD. In the rat-model, both ketamine and the non-specific NMDA antagonist, MK-801 have been shown to block CSD, demonstrated electrophysiologically and by fMRI [29]. In a double-blinded, randomized parallel-group controlled study of 18 patients with migraine with aura, Afridi et al. tested the effect of intranasal ketamine compared to midazolam on aura. Ketamine was shown to reduce severity of aura but not duration, whereas midazolam had no effect [16]. Intranasal ketamine has been shown to consistently improve aura symptoms in some patients with familial hemiplegic migraine, although without significant reduction of headache severity [30]. Note: Broadly blocking CSD with long term administration is viewed as a model for preventive treatment [31]. Memantine is a voltage-dependent noncompetitive antagonist at the glutamatergic NMDA receptor, which inhibits the prolonged influx of calcium associated with neuronal excitotoxicity. In order to identify an agent with preventive activity against refractory and chronic migraine, Bigal, et al. administered daily memantine to 28 patients in an unblinded protocol. Compared to baseline, at 3 months, memantine decreased headache frequency severe headaches and MIDAS scores [32]. Ketamine may be a particularly beneficial treatment option for patients that have failed memantine. Because ketamine is the most potent competitive antagonist at the NMDA-type glutamate receptor whereas memantine is a weaker and noncompetitive antagonist, ketamine may have greater impact on central sensitization [33]. Also of interest, in patients concomitantly treated with opioids, ketamine has been shown to increase pain relief.[34] This may suggest a role for ketamine in the treatment of medication overuse headache.
Of the patients that completed follow up questionnaires, none reported lasting benefit from ketamine 3–6 months post infusion. Prior publications have reported lasting effects on chronic non-headache pain reduction following long term infusions of more than 4 days. Of note, none of the patients included in this case series received ketamine infusion for more than 4 days. Thus, we propose that future studies target ketamine infusions for at least this duration. Once placebo controlled studies on acute headache relief are performed, studies assessing long-term benefits should begin. Strategies for maintaining the effect of intravenous ketamine infusion should also be studied, such as the ongoing administration of a daily or as needed NMDA receptor antagonist. Researchers have used similar strategies in prior studies, such as with the use of mexiletine following lidocaine infusion for chronic daily headache. In this fashion, agents including dextromethorphan-quinidine, memantine, oral or intranasal ketamine could be used to maintain the benefit from NDMA receptor antagonism following ketamine infusion [35, 36].
Conclusions
This study highlights the need for further research regarding new treatment options for patients who suffer daily consequences of refractory migraine and have failed many abortive and preventive medications. Our IV ketamine infusion protocol, based on gradually dose escalation, relieves pain without substantial adverse effects. However, future study of this benefit on short-term headache relief needs to be conducted in a placebo-controlled fashion and this publication may serve as the basis for the design of such a trial.
Acknowledgements
Please note a preliminary version of this research was presented as an abstract at the Congress of the International Headache Society in May 2015 [37].
Authors' contributions
CL, SM, SA, and RL were responsible for the conception and design and the study. CL and SM performed chart reviews with analysis of data. CL, SM, SA, and RL were resposible for interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript and making intellectual contributions to its content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interest
Clinton Lauritsen, Santiago Mazuera and Sait Ashina previously worked at Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital. Clinton Lauritsen and Santiago Mazuera have no disclosures. Sait Ashina received honoraria for lecturing from Allergan, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Avanir Pharmaceuticals and served as a consultant for Avanir Pharmaceuticals. Richard Lipton received research support from the NIH [PO1 AG03949 (Program Director), RO1AG025119 (Investigator), RO1AG022374-06A2 (Investigator), RO1AG034119 (Investigator), RO1AG12101 (Investigator), K23AG030857 (Mentor), K23NS05140901A1 (Mentor), and K23NS47256 (Mentor)], the National Headache Foundation, and the Migraine Research Fund; serves on the editorial board of Neurology; has reviewed for the NIA and NINDS; holds stock options in eNeura Therapeutics; and serves as consultant, advisory board member, or has received honoraria from Allergan, American Headache Society, Autonomic Technologies, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cognimed, Colucid, Eli Lilly, eNeura Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, MAP, Merck, Nautilus Neuroscience, Novartis, NuPathe, Pfizer, and Vedanta.
Additional file
References
- 1.Blumenfeld AM, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS) Cephalalgia. 2011;31(3):301–15. doi: 10.1177/0333102410381145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Buse DC, et al. Chronic migraine prevalence, disability, and sociodemographic factors: results from the American migraine prevalence and prevention study. Headache. 2012;52(10):1456–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02223.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA improves quality of life and reduces impact of chronic migraine. Neurology. 2011;77(15):1465–72. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318232ab65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schulman EA, et al. Defining refractory migraine and refractory chronic migraine: proposed criteria from the Refractory Headache Special Interest Section of the American Headache Society. Headache. 2008;48(6):778–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Adams AM, et al. The impact of chronic migraine: the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study methods and baseline results. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(7):563–78. doi: 10.1177/0333102414552532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.D’Amico D, et al. Disability and quality of life in headache: where we are now and where we are heading. Neurol Sci. 2013;34(Suppl 1):S1–5. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1378-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA improves quality of life and reduces impact of chronic migraine over one year of treatment: pooled results from the PREEMPT randomized clinical trial program. Cephalalgia. 2016;36(9):899–908. doi: 10.1177/0333102416652092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Messali A, et al. Direct and indirect costs of chronic and episodic migraine in the united states: a Web-based survey. Headache. 2016;56(2):306–22. doi: 10.1111/head.12755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang SJ, et al. Comparisons of disability, quality of life, and resource use between chronic and episodic migraineurs: a clinic-based study in Taiwan. Cephalalgia. 2013;33(3):171–81. doi: 10.1177/0333102412468668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache, S The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(Suppl 1):9–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2003.00824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache, S The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629–808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Pearlman S. Defining the pharmacologically intractable headache for clinical trials and clinical practice. Headache. 2010;50(9):1499–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01764.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Norton J. Use of intravenous valproate sodium in status migraine. Headache. 2000;40(9):755–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.00133.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Peterlin BL, et al. Rational combination therapy in refractory migraine. Headache. 2008;48(6):805–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Goldberg ME, et al. Multi-day low dose ketamine infusion for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Physician. 2005;8(2):175–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Afridi SK, et al. A randomized controlled trial of intranasal ketamine in migraine with prolonged aura. Neurology. 2013;80(7):642–7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182824e66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Krusz J, Cagle J, Hall S. Efficacy of IV ketamine in treating refractory migraines in the clinic. J Pain. 2008;9(4):30. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Corssen G, Domino EF. Dissociative anesthesia: further pharmacologic studies and first clinical experience with the phencyclidine derivative CI-581. Anesth Analg. 1966;45(1):29–40. doi: 10.1213/00000539-196601000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sprenger T, et al. Imaging pain modulation by subanesthetic S-(+)-ketamine. Anesth Analg. 2006;103(3):729–37. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000231635.14872.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sanchez-Porras R, et al. The effect of ketamine on optical and electrical characteristics of spreading depolarizations in gyrencephalic swine cortex. Neuropharmacology. 2014;84:52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stewart WF, et al. An international study to assess reliability of the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) score. Neurology. 1999;53(5):988–94. doi: 10.1212/WNL.53.5.988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Coyle CM, Laws KR. The use of ketamine as an antidepressant: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2015;30(3):152–63. doi: 10.1002/hup.2475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Swiatek KM, K Jordan, J. Coffman (2016) New use for an old drug: oral ketamine for treatment-resistant depression. BMJ Case Rep, 2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Niesters M, Dahan A, van Kleef M. Safety and efficacy of ketamine for pain relief. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2016;160:D58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Niesters M, Martini C, Dahan A. Ketamine for chronic pain: risks and benefits. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;77(2):357–67. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Puchalski P, Zyluk A. Results of the treatment of chronic, refractory CRPS with ketamine infusions: a preliminary report. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2016;48(3):143–147. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vikelis M, Mitsikostas DD. The role of glutamate and its receptors in migraine. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2007;6(4):251–7. doi: 10.2174/187152707781387279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ramadan NM. Glutamate and migraine: from Ikeda to the 21st century. Cephalalgia. 2014;34(2):86–9. doi: 10.1177/0333102413499646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shatillo A, et al. Involvement of NMDA receptor subtypes in cortical spreading depression in rats assessed by fMRI. Neuropharmacology. 2015;93:164–70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kaube H, et al. Aura in some patients with familial hemiplegic migraine can be stopped by intranasal ketamine. Neurology. 2000;55(1):139–41. doi: 10.1212/WNL.55.1.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ayata C, et al. Suppression of cortical spreading depression in migraine prophylaxis. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(4):652–61. doi: 10.1002/ana.20778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bigal M, et al. Memantine in the preventive treatment of refractory migraine. Headache. 2008;48(9):1337–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Grande LA, et al. Ultra-low dose ketamine and memantine treatment for pain in an opioid-tolerant oncology patient. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(4):1380–3. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181733ddd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sveticic G, et al. Combinations of morphine with ketamine for patient-controlled analgesia: a new optimization method. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(5):1195–205. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Taylor CP, et al. Pharmacology of dextromethorphan: relevance to dextromethorphan/quinidine (nuedexta(R)) clinical use. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;164:170–82. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Marmura MJ, Passero FC, Jr, Young WB. Mexiletine for refractory chronic daily headache: a report of nine cases. Headache. 2008;48(10):1506–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mazuera S, Ashina S, Lipton RB. (2015) Intravenous Ketamine for the Subacute Treatment of Refractory Chronic Migraine: Case Series: PF24. [Abstract] Headache. 55 Supplement 3:144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]