Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 23.
Published in final edited form as: Mov Disord. 2016 Aug 22;31(11):1748–1751. doi: 10.1002/mds.26759

Subthalamic Synchronized Oscillatory Activity Correlates With Motor Impairment in Patients With Parkinson’s Disease

Wolf-Julian Neumann 1, Katharina Degen 1, Gerd-Helge Schneider 2, Christof Brücke 1, Julius Huebl 1, Peter Brown 3, Andrea A Kühn 1,4,5,6,*
PMCID: PMC5120686  EMSID: EMS70482  PMID: 27548068

Abstract

Objective

Beta band oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) have been proposed as a pathophysiological signature in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential association between oscillatory activity in the STN and symptom severity in PD.

Methods

Subthalamic local field potentials were recorded from 63 PD patients in a dopaminergic OFF state. Power-spectra were analyzed for the frequency range from 5 to 95 Hz and correlated with individual UPDRS-III motor scores in the OFF state.

Results

A correlation between total UPDRS-III scores and 8 to 35 Hz activity was revealed across all patients (ρ = 0.44, P <.0001). When correlating each frequency bin, a narrow range from 10 to 15 Hz remained significant for the correlation (false discovery rate corrected P <.05).

Conclusion

Our results show a correlation between local STN 8 to 35 Hz power and impairment in PD, further supporting the role of subthalamic oscillatory activity as a potential biomarker for PD.

Keywords: deep brain stimulation, basal ganglia, local field potentials, beta oscillations, subthalamic nucleus


Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD).1 One of the hypothesized mechanisms of actions of DBS is a suppression of aberrant oscillatory activity in the target structure.2 Enhanced subthalamic oscillations at beta frequency have been proposed as a pathophysiological signature for PD.3 A multitude of studies have revealed abnormally synchronized activity in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) over a broad range of 8 to 35 Hz in the PD OFF state,2,4,5 and this band, or portions of it, is generally referred to as beta activity. Dopaminergic therapy and DBS both lead to a decrease of spectral power in this frequency band at the same time that the patient experiences clinical symptom alleviation.6,7 The relative difference of 8 to 35 Hz band power between the ON and OFF states has been shown to correlate with the difference in symptom severity as measured by the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III).5 Moreover, DBS-induced suppression of beta band activity correlated with motor performance in PD.8 This has led to the idea that subthalamic oscillatory activity could serve as an index of symptom severity for adaptive stimulation in a closed-loop system.913 Using this approach, an individual threshold of local field potential (LFP) activity would serve as a biomarker to trigger DBS. Whether the scale of 8 to 35 Hz activity in the OFF state correlates with motor impairment within the same state is less clear. Such a correlation is more consistently reported with more complex measures such as LFP complexity14 or standard deviation.15 The observation that dystonia patients also exhibit peaks in the beta frequency band has recently questioned the specificity of beta activity as a biomarker in PD.16 To corroborate previous findings, this study aims to investigate the association between subthalamic oscillatory activity and parkinsonian symptom severity in a large cohort of PD patients in the dopaminergic OFF state. We hypothesized that oscillations in the 8 to 35 Hz band reflect the clinical symptom severity, but a narrower subband could be identified as particularly relevant. To this end, we additionally conducted correlations for each frequency bin of the power spectra to evaluate spectrally distinct contributions to the broad band 8 to 35 Hz group effect.

Materials and Methods

A total of 63 patients with Parkinson’s disease (27 women; age 61 ± 1.2 years, mean ± standard error of the mean; disease duration 12 ± 0.7 years; preoperative UPDRS III OFF medication 35 ± 1.6) who underwent bilateral implantation of DBS electrodes in the STN were included in the study. Of the 63 patients, 16 have previously been reported (7 of 9 patients from Kühn et al. [2006]5 and 9 patients who were reported in Kühn et al. [2009]4 are also included in the study). UPDRS was assessed by a movement disorder specialist before surgery (1-12 weeks) in the OFF medication condition (at least 12 hours after withdrawal of all dopaminergic medication). Note that in this archival data set only total UPDRS III scores were available. Informed consent was obtained before inclusion in the study, which was approved by the local ethics committee in accordance with the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki. Surgical details are described in Kühn et al.17 The DBS macroelectrode used was model 3389 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). Contacts 0 and 3 were the lowermost and uppermost contacts, respectively. Correct placement of the DBS electrodes was confirmed by intraoperative microelectrode recordings in all patients and postoperative imaging in 57 of 63 patients (48 of 63 MRI, 4 of 63 CT, 5 no imaging). All patients were studied 1 to 7 days after implantation of the electrodes while the leads were still externalized. Subthalamic LFP recordings were performed at rest after the patients underwent a 12-hour withdrawal from dopaminergic medication. Dopamine agonist therapy was discontinued at least 1 week prior to the recording. LFPs were obtained from 3 adjacent contact pairs (01, 12, and 23), amplified x50.000 (Digitimer D360; Digitimer, Hertfordshire, UK) and digitized at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz through an A-D converter (CED, Cambridge, UK). During recordings, patients were seated comfortably in an armchair. Overall, 378 STN contact pairs were recorded from 126 electrodes in 63 patients with an average recording length of 264 ± 16 seconds. All data were visually inspected for artefacts and analyzed using custom MATLAB code (The Mathworks, Natick, Massachusetts) based on SPM12 for magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography18 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL, London, UK; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) and FieldTrip19 (Donders Center for Cognitive Neuroimaging, University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; http://fieldtrip.fcdonders.nl/). Contact pairs that did not have artefact-free episodes were omitted (10 of 378 contact pairs from 7 of 63 patients, although not all of the data from any single patient were completely excluded). Segments with artefacts from the remaining contact pairs were rejected before further analysis, leading to an average artefact-free recording length of 255 ± 12 seconds. The continuous rest recordings were divided into arbitrary epochs of 1.024 seconds (1024 samples) and transferred into the frequency domain using Fourier transform-based methods. This resulted in a frequency resolution of 0.98 Hz over 512 frequency bins. Power spectra were normalized to the percentage of total power of 5 to 45 Hz and 55 to 95 Hz and are further expressed as percent of total power. The 0 to 5 and 45 to 55 Hz ranges were omitted to avoid contamination by movement artefact and mains noise, respectively. Relative rather than absolute power was analyzed to allow comparison across patients because absolute power is more likely to be dependent on the proximity to the LFP source than relative power and to vary with local tissue properties. For visualization purposes, power was averaged across all patients. Statistical analysis was conducted using MATLAB’s statistics toolbox. The 8 to 35 Hz5 band power was averaged across all contact pairs for each patient and correlated with individual UPDRS-III scores. In a subsequent analysis, the spectral distribution of an association of clinical symptom severity and power was investigated by correlating the averaged power in each frequency bin in the range of 8 to 35 Hz of the power spectrum (again averaged across all contact pairs), and the preoperative UPDRS III score. Finally, the correlation of the most relevant subband was shown. Spearman’s rank-based correlations were used in all of the analyses, and the statistical significance of all correlations was determined by Monte Carlo permutation. Therefore, a test statistic was generated by calculating 10,000 replications of Spearman’s correlations from averaged spectral power and UPDRS scores with positions of UPDRS values randomly exchanged. P values are reported as the position of the original ρ value in the distribution of the test statistic. Multiple comparisons were corrected by controlling the false discovery rate for α = .05.20

Results

Relative power spectra were averaged across all available contact pairs and electrodes for each patient as displayed in Figure 1A. Spectral peaks in the 8 to 35 Hz range that were present in all patients contributed to rises in amplitude in the group spectrum. Mean 8 to 35 Hz spectral power averaged across all available contact pairs in each patient showed a highly significant association with respective UPDRS-III scores as a measure of clinical signs in the medication OFF state across all patients, as revealed by Spearman’s correlation (Figure 1B; Spearman’s ρ = 0.44, P < .0001). The additional analysis on the spectral focality using repeated Spearman’s correlations for each ~1 Hz bin within the 8 to 35 Hz band averaged across available contact pairs for each patient identified a significant subband of adjacent frequency bins from 10 to 14 Hz that were again correlated with respective UPDRS-III scores (Figure 2; P < .05 false discovery rate corrected for multiple comparisons).

Fig. 1. Averaged spectral power and 8 to 35 Hz correlation.

Fig. 1

Averaged power spectra are displayed on the left vertical axes represented by solid red lines (A). The red shaded areas designate the standard error of the mean for each frequency bin across patients. Non-parametric Spearman‘s correlation between averaged 8 to 35 Hz power, and the clinical symptom severity as measured by the UPDRS-III revealed a significant positive association (B). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Frequency specificity of significant correlation. Nonparametric Spearman’s correlations were calculated again for each frequency bin in the 8 to 35 Hz range with the UPDRS-III score to identify the most influential subband on the correlation. The gray shaded area designates a significant correlation (frequencies 10 to 14 Hz; P <.05 false discovery rate corrected). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Discussion

Here we demonstrate a link between subthalamic 8 to 35 Hz band power and the clinical signs in a large cohort of PD patients. Our results suggest that spectral 8 to 35 Hz power may be used as a surrogate index of motor signs in PD patients. Interestingly, correlations of each frequency bin in this range revealed a subband (10-14 Hz) that is most robustly correlated with the clinical signs in our patients. This subband partially includes the low beta range (13-20 Hz) that has previously been shown to be more sensitive to levodopa-induced reduction when compared with the high beta band (20-35 Hz).21 Taken together these findings could hint to varying functional roles for these frequency bands, with the lower frequency range more implicated in the parkinsonian OFF state. The major limitation of the current study is that it provides only correlative, and no causal, evidence of a link between subthalamic 8 to 35 Hz activity and motor impairment in PD. Furthermore, the preoperative UPDRS-III scores may not represent the current motor state at the time-point of the recordings that were performed shortly after surgery when a stun effect is evident, which can lead to a reduction in motor signs or may influence oscillatory activity in the target area in a differential pattern according to spectral frequency. Long-term recordings with the newly available implantable pulse generator that can record LFP in parallel with stimulation is currently being tested in patients with PD22,23 and will allow the exploration of the relationship between motor impairment and oscillatory activity in a more standardized condition. Whether the link between local STN oscillations and motor state is mechanistically important or epiphenomenal remains to be established, but meanwhile even the simple correlation means that the local power of synchronized oscillatory activity may provide a potential feedback signal indicative of the patients’ motor signs.

Acknowledgments

W.J.N., K.D., and A.A.K. were funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, grant KFO 247). P.B. was funded by the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.

Funding agency: This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, grant KFO 247).

Footnotes

Relevant conflicts of interests/financial disclosures: Nothing to report.

References

  • 1.Krack P, Batir A, Van Blercom N, et al. Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(20):1925–1934. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hammond C, Bergman H, Brown P. Pathological synchronization in Parkinson’s disease: networks, models and treatments. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30(7):357–364. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown P. Oscillatory nature of human basal ganglia activity: relationship to the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2003;18(4):357–363. doi: 10.1002/mds.10358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kühn AA, Tsui A, Aziz T, et al. Pathological synchronisation in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson’s disease relates to both bradykinesia and rigidity. Exp Neurol. 2009;215(2):380–387. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kühn AA, Kupsch A, Schneider GH, Brown P. Reduction in subthalamic 8-35 Hz oscillatory activity correlates with clinical improvement in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23(7):1956–1960. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04717.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brittain JS, Sharott A, Brown P. The highs and lows of beta activity in cortico-basal ganglia loops. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;39(11):1951–1959. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kühn AA, Volkmann J. Innovations in deep brain stimulation methodology. Mov Disord. 2016 Jul 12; doi: 10.1002/mds.26703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kühn AA, Kempf F, Brücke C, et al. High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus suppresses oscillatory beta activity in patients with Parkinson’s disease in parallel with improvement in motor performance. J Neurosci. 2008;28(24):6165–6173. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0282-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Little S, Pogosyan A, Neal S, et al. Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol. 2013;74(3):449–457. doi: 10.1002/ana.23951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Little S, Beudel M, Zrinzo L, et al. Bilateral adaptive deep brain stimulation is effective in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:717–721. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-310972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Little S, Brown P. What brain signals are suitable for feedback control of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1265:9–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06650.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rosa M, Arlotti M, Ardolino G, et al. Adaptive deep brain stimulation in a freely moving Parkinsonian patient. Mov Disord. 2015;30(7):1003–1005. doi: 10.1002/mds.26241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Priori A, Foffani G, Rossi L, Marceglia S. Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) controlled by local field potential oscillations. Exp Neurol. 2013;245:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen CC, Hsu YT, Chan HL, et al. Complexity of subthalamic 13-35 Hz oscillatory activity directly correlates with clinical impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2010;224(1):234–240. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Little S, Pogosyan A, Kühn AA, Brown P. Beta band stability over time correlates with Parkinsonian rigidity and bradykinesia. Exp Neurol. 2012;236(2):383–388. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang DD, de Hemptinne C, Miocinovic S, et al. Subthalamic local field potentials in Parkinson’s disease and isolated dystonia: An evaluation of potential biomarkers. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;89:213–222. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kühn AA, Trottenberg T, Kivi A, Kupsch A, Schneider GH, Brown P. The relationship between local field potential and neuronal discharge in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2005;194(1):212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Litvak V, Mattout J, Kiebel S, et al. EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:852961. doi: 10.1155/2011/852961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Benjamini Y, Krieger AM, Yekutieli D. Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika. 2006;93(3):491–507. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Priori A, Foffani G, Pesenti A, et al. Rhythm-specific pharmacological modulation of subthalamic activity in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2004;189(2):369–379. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Quinn EJ, Blumenfeld Z, Velisar A, et al. Beta oscillations in freely moving Parkinson’s subjects are attenuated during deep brain stimulation. Mov Disord. 2015;30(13):1750–1758. doi: 10.1002/mds.26376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Neumann WJ, Staub F, Horn A, et al. Deep brain recordings using an implanted pulse generator in Parkinson’s disease. Neuromodulation. 2016;19(1):20–24. doi: 10.1111/ner.12348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES