Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
. 2016 Nov 24;10:600. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00600

Neurobiology of Anorexia Nervosa: Serotonin Dysfunctions Link Self-Starvation with Body Image Disturbances through an Impaired Body Memory

Giuseppe Riva 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC5121233  PMID: 27932968

Abstract

The etiology of anorexia nervosa (AN) is still unclear, despite that it is a critical and potentially mortal illness. A recent neurobiological model considers AN as the outcome of dysfunctions in the neuronal processes related to appetite and emotionality (Kaye et al., 2009, 2013). However, this model still is not able to answer a critical question: What is behind body image disturbances (BIDs) in AN? The article starts its analysis from reviewing some of the studies exploring the effects of the serotonin systems in memory (episodic, working, and spatial) and its dysfunctions. The review suggests that serotonin disturbances may: (a) facilitate the encoding of third person (allocentric) episodic memories; (b) facilitate the consolidation of emotional episodic memories (e.g., teasing), if preceded by repeated stress; (c) reduce voluntary inhibition of mnestic contents; (d) impair allocentric spatial memory. If we discuss these results within the interpretative frame suggested by the “Allocentric Lock Hypothesis” (Riva, 2012, 2014), we can hypothesize that altered serotoninergic activity in AN patients: (i) improves their ability to store and consolidate negative autobiographical memories, including those of their body, in allocentric perspective; (ii) impairs their ability to trigger voluntary inhibition of the previously stored negative memory of the body; (iii) impairs their capacity to retrieve/update allocentric information. Taken together, these points suggest a possible link between serotonin dysfunctions, memory impairments and BIDs: the impossibility of updating a disturbed body memory using real time experiential data—I'm locked to a wrong body stored in long term memory—pushes AN patients to control body weight and shape even when underweight.

Keywords: 5-HTTLPR, serotonin transporter gene, serotonin, anorexia nervosa (AN), allocentric lock, body image disturbances, memory consolidation, memory reconsolidation

Introduction

Although anorexia nervosa (AN) is a critical and potentially mortal illness (Mustelin et al., 2016), its etiology is still unclear (Kaye et al., 2013). Recent neurobiological studies consider AN as the outcome of dysfunctions in the neuronal processes related to appetite and emotionality (Kaye et al., 2009, 2013).

In their reviews, Kaye et al. (2009, 2013) suggest that AN patients are characterized by a dysregulation in the anterior ventral striatal pathway that may create a vulnerability for dysregulated appetitive behaviors. The high level of self-control in individuals with AN—produced by an exaggerated dorsal cognitive circuit functioning—allows them to inhibit appetite.

This model, even if very influential and able to provide clear suggestions for therapy, still is not able to answer a critical question: What is behind body image distortion in AN? As noted by Kaye et al. (2013): “This may be the most puzzling of all AN symptoms, in part because AN individuals feel fat but tend to have normal perceptions of other people's bodies” (p. 117).

A possible path for providing an answer to this question is to investigate the role of altered monoamine neural modulation in AN (Haleem, 2012).

The term “monoamine neurotransmitters” refers to the particular dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NAD), adrenaline (AD), and serotonin (5-HT) neurotransmitters that are released from neurons in both the brain and peripheral nervous system (Kaye et al., 1984) and that affect a variety of psychobiological factors including hunger, anxiety, impulsivity, perception, and memory. These neurotransmitters have been extensively investigated, and different studies suggest a significant decrease in AN patients when compared to normal subjects (Kaye et al., 2013). In particular, the 5-HT and DA systems have a significant impairment in AN patients (Kaye et al., 2009), with possible effects on satiety, impulse control, and mood (5-HT), and aberrant rewarding effects (DA) of motivation and food (Kaye et al., 2013).

Although the possible role of dopamine in AN is still controversial (O'Hara et al., 2015; Peng et al., 2016; Södersten et al., 2016), a number of studies evidenced an altered serotoninergic activity in AN (Kumar et al., 2010; Calati et al., 2011; Jean et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2015) and demonstrated the role of the 5-HT receptors located in the hypothalamus in food intake and body weight control (Compan et al., 2012; Haleem, 2012). In this view, the 5-HT impairment may have a clinical role in explaining the insufficient food consumption in AN. As underlined by Compan et al. (2012): “The brain 5-HT system is central in the control of food intake and particularly in eating disorders…Accordingly, environmental changes (stress) could alter the adaptive decision-making concerning feeding. If the adaptive response to stress depends on the 5-HT system, eating disorders could thus emerge when 5-HT neurons reach the limit of their adaptive capacities.” (p. 723). Additionally, early-life stress, a risk factor for eating disorders (Su et al., 2016), induces persistent changes in 5-HT receptors and transporter (Bravo et al., 2014).

However, recent studies also suggest a link between 5-HT and memory dysfunctions, creating a possible bridge between serotonin disturbances, impaired body memory, and body image disturbances.

Our experience of the body is not direct (Figure 1), but it is mediated by perceptual information, recalibrated through stored information (body representations) and influenced by internal information—proprioception, interoception, and vestibular input (Blanke et al., 2015; Pazzaglia and Zantedeschi, 2016).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Body Image Disturbances and their link with the Allocentric Lock Hypothesis.

In this view, body image distortion can be seen as a multidimensional construct (Figure 1) that, according to recent neuroimaging studies, includes three different components: affective, cognitive, and perceptive, (Gaudio and Quattrocchi, 2012). The affective and cognitive components of body image distortion are widely accepted and related both to socio-cultural issues (van den Berg et al., 2002; Tylka, 2011; Swami, 2015)—internalization of an ideal body figure (Fitzsimmons-Craft et al., 2016), social body comparison (Andrew et al., 2016), and self-objectification (Dakanalis et al., 2016a)—and/or to brain dysfunctions (Sato et al., 2013; Suchan et al., 2015; Esposito et al., 2016)—alterations of the prefrontal cortex, the insula and the amygdala (Dakanalis et al., 2016b).

The interest for the perceptual component of body image distortion is more recent and related to the outcomes of different functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; Mohr et al., 2010; Suchan et al., 2013). Gaudio and colleagues summarizing these studies in a recent systematic review (Gaudio et al., 2016) conclude “that several brain regions could be involved in body image disturbances and may sustain an impaired integration between real and perceived internal/external state of one's own body in AN patients” (p. 582). For example, neuroimaging studies have demonstrated both functional and structural more marked alterations in visual areas, with anomalies in body-image processing related to self but not to others (Uher et al., 2005; Sachdev et al., 2008). A specific association between therapy-related changes and modulation of the BOLD signal in these areas suggests that this type of distortion of the body's configuration is based on visual contributions (Vocks et al., 2011). Specifically, a recent study showed that AN patients' perception of their own body is more easily malleable by exposure to round figures as compared to controls (Cazzato et al., 2016). Nevertheless, another systematic review underlined a multisensory impairment of body perception in AN that goes beyond visual misperception and involves tactile and proprioceptive sensory components and suggests a critical role of memory in these processes (Gaudio et al., 2014). As suggested by two recent reviews (Longo, 2015; Martijn et al., 2015) and underlined by Fuchs (2012): “The body is not only a structure of limbs and organs, of sensations and movements. It is a historically formed body whose experiences have left their traces in its invisible dispositions…Sensations or situations experienced by the lived body may function as implicit memory cores which, under suitable circumstances, can release their enclosed memories.” (p. 20).

An emerging etiological model of AN, that focuses on body memories is the “Allocentric Lock (AL) Hypothesis” (Riva, 2012, 2014; Riva et al., 2015).

This theory suggests, that AN is the outcome of a primary disturbance in the way the body is “experienced” and “remembered.” Specifically, individuals with (or developing) this disorder may be locked to an allocentric (third person) disturbed memory of their body that, independently of its causes, is not more updated by experiential data, even after a successful diet and/or a significant weight reduction (Figure 1—for a broader review see: Riva, 2007, 2011, 2012, 2014; Gaudio and Riva, 2013; Riva et al., 2015; Dakanalis et al., 2016b).

The article highlights some of the important studies discussing the effects of 5-HT markers (i.e., receptors and transporter) on memory dysfunctions, which may play a role in clarifying the link between decreased serotonin transmission, body memory, and body image disturbances.

The role of 5-HT in working, spatial, and episodic memory

A wealth of experimental animal studies demonstrate the role of the serotonin systems in memory and its dysfunctions, even if their role is still poorly understood (Meneses et al., 2011; Meneses, 2013; Gasbarri and Pompili, 2014; Gasbarri et al., 2016; Meneses and Gasbarri, 2016). It is beyond the scope of this paper to describe the results of all these studies (for an in-depth analysis please refer to Meneses et al., 2011; Roberts and Hedlund, 2012; Meneses, 2013; Glikmann-Johnston et al., 2015; Meneses and Gasbarri, 2016). In this context, we will focus only on the studies more relevant to our discussion.

5-HT receptors and memory

The serotonin receptors, activated by the neurotransmitter serotonin, mediate both excitatory, and inhibitory neurotransmission in the central and peripheral nervous systems. They are classified in seven main receptor subtypes: 5-HT1−7. Also, 5-HT1 receptors include 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, and 5-HT1D subtypes; while 5-HT2 receptors include 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C subtypes.

Episodic memory

The role of 5-HT receptors in episodic memory was recently explored in animal studies by Zhang et al. (2013, 2016), Bekinschtein et al. (2013), and Morici et al. (2015). On one side, the activation of 5-HT2A receptor improved object memory consolidation, without affecting encoding or retrieval, (Zhang et al., 2013, 2016) and enhanced the consolidation of contextual and cued fear memories (Zhang et al., 2013).

On the other side, the loss of 5-HT2a receptors produced deficits in the ability to remember both an association between the objects and the context in which they were seen (object-in-place associations; Bekinschtein et al., 2013; Morici et al., 2015), and the objects and their relative position in time (Morici et al., 2015). However, this deficit was not general but it related to the level of interference (Morici et al., 2015): the deficit appeared when the interference level was high, suggesting a role for the 5-HT2a receptor in memory interference resolution. Interestingly, an impairment in memory interference resolution is also associated with alexithymia (Coligan and Koven, 2015). Another factor influencing the role of 5-HT in episodic memory is stress. A recent study showed that serotonergic fear memory consolidation in rats, induced by an infusion of a 5-HT2C receptor antagonist, happened only after a history of repeated stress exposure (Baratta et al., 2016).

In agreement with this and other results (Ballaz et al., 2007; Ohmura et al., 2015), both the use of serotonergic reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonergic–noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in a human study significantly improved the episodic memory and to a lesser extent, working memory (Herrera-Guzmán et al., 2009). This finding is in line with a study by Mlinar et al. (2015) showing that in rats, hippocampal long-term potentiation at CA3/CA1 synapses was facilitated by endogenous 5-HT.

Working memory

In a first animal study, Zhang and colleagues explored the effects of the activation of 5-HT2A receptors in rats (Li et al., 2015). Their data underlined an enhancement of working memory (increased choice accuracy in the T-maze rewarded alternation test) after the injection of the 5-HT2A receptor agonist. A similar result was reported by López-Vázquez et al. (2014).

In another animal study, Gonzalez-Burgos et al. (2012) explored the effects of prefrontal serotonin depletion on the memory strategies (allocentric and egocentric) used in a working memory task. The results suggested that serotonin may be involved in the prefrontal organization of egocentric working memory, based on own movement-guided responses.

Spatial memory

In an animal study, Gutiérrez-Guzmán et al. (2011) produced 5-HT hippocampal depletion through lesions to the cingulate bundle, fimbria, and fornix of rats. The hippocampal 5-HT depletion facilitated place learning accuracy. In a second study, the same authors (Gutiérrez-Guzmán et al., 2012) lesioned serotonergic terminals of the supramammillary/posterior hypothalamus nuclei in rats. Their data suggested a significant role of 5-HT in the intermediate- and long-term consolidation of spatial information (Gutiérrez-Guzmán et al., 2012). In particular, different animal studies, using 5-HT7 receptor knockout mice, showed an impairment in the recognition of novel locations but not in the recognition of novel objects (Ballaz et al., 2007; Sarkisyan and Hedlund, 2009). A similar result was found in different studies involving activation or blockade of the 5-HT1A: if higher levels of 5-HT maintained or improved spatial memory, reduced levels of 5-HT impaired spatial memory (Glikmann-Johnston et al., 2015).

A possible explanation for these data comes from a computational network model used to investigate 5-HT modulation on spatial working memory (Cano-Colino et al., 2014). Its results suggest that serotonin modulates spatial working memory performance nonmonotonically via 5-HT1A (Koenig et al., 2008) and 5-HT2A (Bekinschtein et al., 2013) receptors.

5-HT transporter and memory

The serotonin transporter (SERT) is an integral membrane protein with the role of taking up serotonin released during serotonergic neurotransmission by transporting it from synaptic spaces into presynaptic neurons (Meneses et al., 2011; Coleman et al., 2016). Numerous gene variants have been identified, which have a significant impact on its functioning. The most studied of these SERT gene variants is the SERT gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR), which results in a short or long form (Nakamura et al., 2000; Segal et al., 2009): the short form is characterized by a reduction in SERT mRNA, SERT binding, and 5-HT when compared with the long form.

Episodic memory

Olivier et al. (2009) in a study using different SERT knock-out rats, found that SERT −/− and SERT +/− rats showed evidence of impaired object memory. The impairment was not found in SERT +/+ rats.

Wu and colleagues recently evaluated the effects of SERT gene knockdown on contextual fear memory in mice (Wu et al., 2016). Their results, in agreement with previous studies (Dai et al., 2008; Sivamaruthi et al., 2015), suggested that SERT knockdown impairs the extinction of contextual fear memory (Wu et al., 2016). Line and colleagues, in another animal study of mice over-expressing the SERT (Line et al., 2014), found an impairment on appetitive and aversively motivated learning tasks, suggesting a role for serotonin in the processing of both aversive and rewarding stimuli (McCabe et al., 2010).

In a human study, Lemogne et al. (2009) found that the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism moderated the effects of life stress on visual perspective for positive memories: individuals with at least one low or long G allele used an allocentric perspective for positive memories during life stress more than individuals did who were homozygous for the long A allele.

Working memory

A study involving both cocaine users and controls genotyped for 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms underlined a significant gene × environment interaction related to the role of serotonin in working memory (Havranek et al., 2015). In cocaine users, 5-HTTLPR long genotype was a risk allele for a worse working memory performance, whereas in healthy controls, it was associated with better working memory performance. Analogously, high SERT mRNA levels were associated with working memory impairments in cocaine users, but with increased performance in normal subjects. A link between working memory and 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms was also found by Konrad et al. (2011) and by Price et al. (2013): female normal subjects with the 5-HTTLPR low allele evidenced a poorer working memory performance.

Spatial memory

In their review, Kalueff et al. (2010) discussed the spatial memory performance of SERT gene knockdown (−/−) mice and rats. In their view (Kalueff et al., 2010), “The absence of the SERT slightly impairs hippocampus-dependent spatial/object memory, in striking contrast with improved amygdala-dependent emotional memory (e.g., fear conditioning) in SERT (−/−) rodents.” (p. 382).

The role of 5-HT systems in the allocentric lock

The studies discussed above, even if largely based on animal research, suggest a link between the 5-HT systems and the memory processes—encoding/storage, consolidation, and retrieval/reconsolidation (see Figure 2)—involved in the allocentric lock. Furthermore, 5-HT effects appear to be modulated by stress (Baratta et al., 2016) and estrogen (Epperson et al., 2012), and have a stronger influence on working and short-term memory than on long-term memory (Hritcua et al., 2007).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The link between serotonin disturbances and body memory impairments.

In relation to encoding and storage, the study by Lemogne et al. (2009) suggested that the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism influences the visual perspective used for storing positive memories during life stress. Specifically, individuals with at least one low or long G allele used more a third person perspective in episodic memory, facilitating the storing of an allocentric memory of their body. More, the results of the study by Gonzalez-Burgos et al. (2012) showed that serotonin depletion impaired the egocentric working memory performance while no effects were found for the allocentric one.

In relation to the consolidation process, it is well known that in humans, it is impaired by a decrease in serotonergic neurotransmission (Sivamaruthi et al., 2015). Animal studies also have found that a decrease in 5-HT reduced conditioned responses in both short and long-term memory (Gonzalez et al., 2013), while its availability improved the stabilization of emotional memories (Baratta et al., 2016), if preceded by a history of repeated stress exposure (Ohmura et al., 2015).

The reviewed studies also suggested a critical role of 5-HT in memory retrieval and reconsolidation. In humans, serotonin receptor 5-HTR2A gene polymorphism was associated with a significant impairment in memory retrieval (de Quervain et al., 2003; Sigmund et al., 2008). Also, if we focus on the computational network model used to investigate 5-HT modulation on spatial working memory (Cano-Colino et al., 2014), its results emphasized a critical role of 5-HT in the inhibition of currently irrelevant or unwanted information (Marsh et al., 2012). According to the authors: “Increasing levels of tonic [5-HT] …favored spatial working memory by suppressing unwanted false memories” (p. 2459). Sarkisyan and Hedlund, discussing the results of their study (Sarkisyan and Hedlund, 2009), suggested: “The 5-HT7 receptor might be important in the formation of associations with the network of memories and the compilation and correlation of these memories with changes in the environment” (p. 29).

Recalling information from long-term memory usually requires the selection of a specific target from a wider set of targets competing for access. Taken together, these effects suggest a role of serotonin in inhibiting unwanted targets (proactive interference) that can be impaired during decreased serotonin transmission. Two studies with monkeys confirmed this interpretation (Clarke et al., 2004, 2007): selective serotonin depletion of the orbitofrontal cortex impairs the ability to switch between visual stimuli when responding on a serial discrimination reversal task. Specifically, as the authors noted: “The failure of 5-HT-lesioned monkeys to cease responding to the previously correct stimulus was due to an inability to disengage from that stimulus” (p. 24). Furthermore, a recent study also points out the role of serotonin in memory reconsolidation (Nikitin et al., 2016): in snails, the 5-HT receptor antagonist induced the disruption of memory reconsolidation related to previously conditioned food aversion.

Finally, if we focus on the brain systems involved in the allocentric computations (Ekstrom et al., 2014)—hippocampus, retrosplenial cortex, and parahippocampal cortex—we can find a significant serotonergic innervation affecting the proliferation and activity of their cells.

For example, in mice, 5-HT receptors induce spine growth in the CA1 (Restivo et al., 2008), an area of the hippocampus involved in spatial autobiographical memory and in the development of allocentric view independent representations. It is also well-known that serotonin synthesis has a positive regulatory factor on the granule cell layers of the retrosplenial cortex, a brain area involved in transforming allocentric representations into egocentric ones (Vann and Aggleton, 2005; Vann et al., 2009) by improving their proliferation (Richter-Levin and Segal, 1990; Brezun and Daszuta, 2000). A decreased serotonin transmission may impair these areas, disrupting their functions. A study of 5-HT7 receptor-deficient mice (5-HT7 –/–) supported this hypothesis (Sarkisyan and Hedlund, 2009): in a spatial memory task the mice demonstrated an impaired allocentric spatial memory whereas egocentric spatial memory remained intact. Also, different recent neuroimaging studies with AN patients revealed significant brain dysfunctions in the key areas involved in the allocentric computation (Riva and Gaudio, 2012; Gaudio and Riva, 2013).

Conclusions

In conclusion, this review suggests that on one side, 5-HT systems modulate memory and its dysfunctions; on the other side, a decreased serotonin level impairs the different memory processes—encoding/storage, consolidation, and retrieval/reconsolidation—involved in episodic and autobiographical memory (see Figure 2). Specifically, serotonin disturbances:

  • - Facilitate the encoding of allocentric (from outside) episodic memories;

  • - Facilitate the consolidation of emotional episodic memories (e.g., teasing), if preceded by repeated stress;

  • - Reduce voluntary inhibition of mnestic contents;

  • - Impair allocentric spatial memory.

If we discuss these data within the interpretative frame suggested by the Allocentric Lock Hypothesis, we can hypothesize that AN patients:

  1. Are more able to store and consolidate negative autobiographical memories, including those of their body, in allocentric perspective. As demonstrated by Eich et al. (2009, 2012), these memories produce a significant reduction in one's cortical representations of the physical self. As clarified by the authors (Eich et al., 2012): “When we choose to relive past events from a perspective outside our body, we shut down the neural circuitry in the insula that is central for monitoring our bodies' internal states” (p. 177). A first support for this hypothesis is given by the multisensory impairment of body perception existing in AN patients, suggesting that their bodily experience is shaped by sensorimotor/proprioceptive memory (Gaudio et al., 2014).

  2. Have an impaired ability to trigger voluntary inhibition of the previously stored negative memory of the body, impairing their possibility to disengage, and update it during the reconsolidation process. Two recent studies with AN patients provide a preliminary support for this vision. The first study, involving both patients with anorexia and normal subjects genotyped for 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms (Collantoni et al., 2016), provided evidence of an impaired response inhibition in AN patients and suggested an important role of the serotoninergic system in inhibitory control (Conway and Fthenaki, 2003). A second study by Bomba et al. (2014), with a sample of both AN and healthy volunteers, showed an overgeneralization of autobiographical memory in AN patients, usually explained by the difficulty in ignoring interference from irrelevant cognitions (Smets et al., 2014).

  3. Have an impaired capacity to retrieve and update allocentric information. A recent study by Serino et al. (2016) offered a first support for this hypothesis. The study showed that both AN and bulimic patients were significantly less accurate in retrieving and updating—within an allocentric frame of reference—the position of an object previously memorized using an egocentric viewpoint.

In conclusion, the data accumulated in this review suggest a possible link between serotonin dysfunctions and body image disturbances in AN: the impossibility of updating a disturbed body memory using real time experiential data—I'm locked to a wrong body stored in long term memory—pushes AN patients to control body weight and shape even when underweight. This view is in agreement with a recent hypothesis that describe anorexia as a disturbance of the self (Amianto et al., 2016) specifically associated “with spatial functioning possibly related to experiencing one's own body as an integrated aspect of the self, and temporal functioning possibly related to integrating the self in a coherent narrative over time.” (p. 7). More, it is also in agreement with the free energy framework suggesting that pre-existing mental models shape current perception (Friston and Kiebel, 2009). According to this vision the brain maintains hypotheses of the causes of sensory input predicting inputs, which are then compared with actual sensory input. In this view body image disturbances may be the outcome of dysfunctional predictive mechanisms (Seth et al., 2012; Di Lernia et al., 2016).

However, it is also true that this review is largely based on animal studies. Due to this, there exists a theoretical gap between the outcome of these studies and the possible effects of serotonin in humans. Further, studies are needed to explore and clarify the link between human serotonin dysfunctions, body image disturbances, and the causes of AN.

Author contributions

GR conceived, collected, analyzed, interpreted the data, and gave his final approval of the version to be published.

Funding

This paper was supported by the PRIN 2015 project “Unlocking the memory of the body: Virtual Reality in Anorexia Nervosa” (201597WTTM).

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer EW and handling Editor declared their shared affiliation, and the handling Editor states that the process nevertheless met the standards of a fair and objective review.

References

  1. Amianto F., Northoff G., Abbate Daga G., Fassino S., Tasca G. A. (2016). Is anorexia nervosa a disorder of the self? a psychological approach. Front. Psychol. 7:849. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrew R., Tiggemann M., Clark L. (2016). Predicting body appreciation in young women: an integrated model of positive body image. Body Image 18, 34–42. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ballaz S. J., Akil H., Watson S. J. (2007). The 5-HT7 receptor: role in novel object discrimination and relation to novelty-seeking behavior. Neuroscience 149, 192–202. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.07.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baratta M. V., Kodandaramaiah S. B., Monahan P. E., Yao J., Weber M. D., Lin P. A., et al. (2016). Stress enables reinforcement-elicited serotonergic consolidation of fear memory. Biol. Psychiatry 79, 814–822. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.06.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bekinschtein P., Renner M. C., Gonzalez M. C., Weisstaub N. (2013). Role of medial prefrontal cortex serotonin 2A receptors in the control of retrieval of recognition memory in rats. J. Neurosci. 33, 15716–15725. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2087-13.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blanke O., Slater M., Serino A. (2015). Behavioral, neural, and computational principles of bodily self-consciousness. Neuron 88, 145–166. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bomba M., Marfone M., Brivio E., Oggiano S., Broggi F., Neri F., et al. (2014). Autobiographical memory in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa. Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev. 22, 479–486. 10.1002/erv.2321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bravo J. A., Dinan T. G., Cryan J. F. (2014). Early-life stress induces persistent alterations in 5-HT1A receptor and serotonin transporter mRNA expression in the adult rat brain. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 7:24. 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brezun J. M., Daszuta A. (2000). Serotonin may stimulate granule cell proliferation in the adult hippocampus, as observed in rats grafted with foetal raphe neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 391–396. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00932.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Calati R., De Ronchi D., Bellini M., Serretti A. (2011). The 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and eating disorders: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 44, 191–199. 10.1002/eat.20811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cano-Colino M., Almeida R., Gomez-Cabrero D., Artigas F., Compte A. (2014). Serotonin regulates performance nonmonotonically in a spatial working memory network. Cereb. Cortex 24, 2449–2463. 10.1093/cercor/bht096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cazzato V., Mian E., Mele S., Tognana G., Todisco P., Urgesi C. (2016). The effects of body exposure on self-body image and esthetic appreciation in anorexia nervosa. Exp. Brain Res. 234, 695–709. 10.1007/s00221-015-4498-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen J., Kang Q., Jiang W., Fan J., Zhang M., Yu S., et al. (2015). The 5-HTTLPR confers susceptibility to anorexia nervosa in Han Chinese: evidence from a case-control and family-based study. PLoS ONE 10:e0119378. 10.1371/journal.pone.0119378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Clarke H. F., Dalley J. W., Crofts H. S., Robbins T. W., Roberts A. C. (2004). Cognitive inflexibility after prefrontal serotonin depletion. Science 304, 878–880. 10.1126/science.1094987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Clarke H. F., Walker S. C., Dalley J. W., Robbins T. W., Roberts A. C. (2007). Cognitive inflexibility after prefrontal serotonin depletion is behaviorally and neurochemically specific. Cereb. Cortex 17, 18–27. 10.1093/cercor/bhj120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Coleman J. A., Green E. M., Gouaux E. (2016). X-ray structures and mechanism of the human serotonin transporter. Nature 532, 334–339. 10.1038/nature17629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Coligan S. M., Koven N. S. (2015). Interference resolution in emotional working memory as a function of alexithymia. Am. J. Psychol. 128, 337–345. 10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.3.0337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Collantoni E., Michelon S., Tenconi E., Degortes D., Titton F., Manara R., et al. (2016). Functional connectivity correlates of response inhibition impairment in anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 247, 9–16. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Compan V., Laurent L., Jean A., Macary C., Bockaert J., Dumuis A. (2012). Serotonin signaling in eating disorders. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. 1, 715–729. 10.1002/wmts.45 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Conway M. A., Fthenaki A. (2003). Disruption of inhibitory control of memory following lesions to the frontal and temporal lobes. Cortex 39, 667–686. 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70859-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dai J. X., Han H. L., Tian M., Cao J., Xiu J. B., Song N. N., et al. (2008). Enhanced contextual fear memory in central serotonin-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 11981–11986. 10.1073/pnas.0801329105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dakanalis A., Carrà G., Calogero R., Fida R., Clerici M., Zanetti M. A., et al. (2016a). The developmental effects of media-ideal internalization and self-objectification processes on adolescents' negative body-feelings, dietary restraint, and binge eating. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 24, 997–1010. 10.1007/s00787-014-0649-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dakanalis A., Gaudio S., Serino S., Clerici M., Carrà G., Riva G. (2016b). Body-image distortion in anorexia nervosa. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2, 16026 10.1038/nrdp.2016.26 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. de Quervain D. J., Henke K., Aerni A., Coluccia D., Wollmer M. A., Hock C., et al. (2003). A functional genetic variation of the 5-HT2a receptor affects human memory. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 1141–1142. 10.1038/nn1146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Di Lernia D., Serino S., Cipresso P., Riva G. (2016). Ghosts in the machine. Interoceptive modeling for chronic pain treatment. Front. Neurosci. 10:314. 10.3389/fnins.2016.00314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Eich E., Handy T. C., Holmes E. A., Lerner J., McIsaac H. K. (2012). Field and observer perspectives in autobiographical memory, in Social Thinking and Interpersonal Behavior, eds Forgas J. P., Fiedler K., Sedikides C. (New York, NY: Taylor & Francis; ), 163–81. [Google Scholar]
  27. Eich E., Nelson A. L., Leghari M. A., Handy T. C. (2009). Neural systems mediating field and observer memories. Neuropsychologia 47, 2239–2251. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ekstrom A. D., Arnold A. E., Iaria G. (2014). A critical review of the allocentric spatial representation and its neural underpinnings: toward a network-based perspective. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:803. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Epperson C. N., Amin Z., Ruparel K., Gur R., Loughead J. (2012). Interactive effects of estrogen and serotonin on brain activation during working memory and affective processing in menopausal women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37, 372–382. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Esposito R., Cieri F., di Giannantonio M., Tartaro A. (2016). The role of body image and self-perception in anorexia nervosa: the neuroimaging perspective. J. Neuropsychol. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/jnp.12106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fitzsimmons-Craft E. E., Bardone-Cone A. M., Crosby R. D., Engel S. G., Wonderlich S. A., Bulik C. M. (2016). Mediators of the relationship between thin-ideal internalization and body dissatisfaction in the natural environment. Body Image 18, 113–122. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Friston K., Kiebel S. (2009). Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364, 1211–1221. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fuchs T. (2012). The phenomenology of body memory, in Body Memory, Metaphor and Movement, eds Koch S. C., Fuchs T., Summa M., Müller C. (Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company; ), 9–22. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gasbarri A., Pompili A. (2014). Serotonergic 5-HT7 receptors and cognition. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 311–323. 10.1515/revneuro-2013-0066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gasbarri A., Bert B., Meneses A. (2016). Editorial: 5-HT2A/2B/2C receptors, memory, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Front. Pharmacol. 7:9. 10.3389/fphar.2016.00009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gaudio S., Quattrocchi C. C. (2012). Neural basis of a multidimensional model of body image distortion in anorexia nervosa. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1839–1847. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gaudio S., Riva G. (2013). Body image disturbances in anorexia: the link between functional connectivity alterations and reference frames. Biol. Psychiatry 73, e25–e26. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.08.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gaudio S., Brooks S. J., Riva G. (2014). Nonvisual multisensory impairment of body perception in anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of neuropsychological studies. PLoS ONE 9:e110087. 10.1371/journal.pone.0110087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gaudio S., Wiemerslage L., Brooks S. J., Schiöth H. B. (2016). A systematic review of resting-state functional-MRI studies in anorexia nervosa: evidence for functional connectivity impairment in cognitive control and visuospatial and body-signal integration. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 71, 578–589. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Glikmann-Johnston Y., Saling M. M., Reutens D. C., Stout J. C. (2015). Hippocampal 5-HT1A receptor and spatial learning and memory. Front. Pharmacol. 6:289. 10.3389/fphar.2015.00289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gonzalez R., Chávez-Pascacio K., Meneses A. (2013). Role of 5-HT5A receptors in the consolidation of memory. Behav. Brain Res. 252, 246–251. 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gonzalez-Burgos I., Fletes-Vargas G., Gonzalez-Tapia D., Gonzalez-Ramirez M. M., Rivera-Cervantes M. C., Martinez-Degollado M. (2012). Prefrontal serotonin depletion impairs egocentric, but not allocentric working memory in rats. Neurosci. Res. 73, 321–327. 10.1016/j.neures.2012.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gutiérrez-Guzmán B. E., Hernández-Pérez J. J., González-Burgos I., Feria-Velásco A., Medina R., Guevara M. A., et al. (2011). Hippocampal serotonin depletion facilitates place learning concurrent with an increase in CA1 high frequency theta activity expression in the rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 652, 73–81. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.11.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gutiérrez-Guzmán B. E., Hernández-Pérez J. J., López-Vázquez M. Á., Fregozo C. S., Guevara M. Á., Olvera-Cortés M. E. (2012). Serotonin depletion of supramammillary/posterior hypothalamus nuclei produces place learning deficiencies and alters the concomitant hippocampal theta activity in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 682, 99–109. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.02.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Haleem D. J. (2012). Serotonin neurotransmission in anorexia nervosa. Behav. Pharmacol. 23, 478–495. 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328357440d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Havranek M. M., Vonmoos M., Müller C. P., Bütiger J. R., Tasiudi E., Hulka L. M., et al. (2015). Serotonin transporter and tryptophan hydroxylase gene variations mediate working memory deficits of cocaine users. Neuropsychopharmacology 40, 2929–2937. 10.1038/npp.2015.146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Herrera-Guzmán I., Gudayol-Ferré E., Herrera-Guzmán D., Guárdia-Olmos J., Hinojosa-Calvo E., Herrera-Abarca J. E. (2009). Effects of selective serotonin reuptake and dual serotonergic-noradrenergic reuptake treatments on memory and mental processing speed in patients with major depressive disorder. J. Psychiatr. Res. 43, 855–863. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hritcua L., Clicinschia M., Nabeshimab T. (2007). Brain serotonin depletion impairs short-term memory, but not long-term memory in rats. Physiol. Behav. 91, 652–657. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Jean A., Laurent L., Bockaert J., Charnay Y., Dusticier N., Nieoullon A., et al. (2012). The nucleus accumbens 5-HTR4-CART pathway ties anorexia to hyperactivity. Transl. Psychiatry 2, e203. 10.1038/tp.2012.131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kalueff A. V., Olivier J. D., Nonkes L. J., Homberg J. R. (2010). Conserved role for the serotonin transporter gene in rat and mouse neurobehavioral endophenotypes. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 373–386. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kaye W. H., Ebert M. H., Raleigh M., Lake R. (1984). Abnormalities in Cns monoamine metabolism in anorexia-nervosa. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 41, 350–355. 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790150040007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kaye W. H., Fudge J. L., Paulus M. (2009). New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 573–584. 10.1038/nrn2682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kaye W. H., Wierenga C. E., Bailer U. F., Simmons A. N., Bischoff-Grethe A. (2013). Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels: the neurobiology of anorexia nervosa. Trends Neurosci. 36, 110–120. 10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Koenig J., Cosquer B., Cassel J. C. (2008). Activation of septal 5-HT(1A) receptors alters spatial memory encoding, interferes with consolidation, but does not affect retrieval in rats subjected to a water-maze task. Hippocampus 18, 99–118. 10.1002/hipo.20368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Konrad C., Kugel H., Zwitserlood P., Dannlowski U., Pyka M., Domschke K. (2011). Serotonin-transporter polymorphism modulates anterior cingulate cortex activation during working memory tasks - an fMRI study. Pharmacopsychiatry 44, 21–A67. Available online at: https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0031-1292508 10.1055/s-0031-1292508 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kumar K. K., Tung S., Iqbal J. (2010). Bone loss in anorexia nervosa: leptin, serotonin, and the sympathetic nervous system. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1211, 51–65. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05810.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lemogne C., Bergouignan L., Boni C., Gorwood P., Pélissolo A., Fossati P. (2009). Genetics and personality affect visual perspective in autobiographical memory. Conscious. Cogn. 18, 823–830. 10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Li L. B., Zhang L., Sun Y. N., Han L. N., Wu Z. H., Zhang Q. J., et al. (2015). Activation of serotonin(2A) receptors in the medial septum-diagonal band of Broca complex enhanced working memory in the hemiparkinsonian rats. Neuropharmacology 91, 23–33. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.11.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Line S. J., Barkus C., Rawlings N., Jennings K., McHugh S., Sharp T., et al. (2014). Reduced sensitivity to both positive and negative reinforcement in mice over-expressing the 5-hydroxytryptamine transporter. Eur. J. Neurosci. 40, 3735–3745. 10.1111/ejn.12744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Longo M. R. (2015). Implicit and explicit body representations. Eur. Psychol. 20, 6–15. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000198 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. López-Vázquez M. Á., López-Loeza E., Lajud Ávila N., Gutiérrez-Guzmán B. E., Hernández-Pérez J. J., Reyes Y. E., et al. (2014). Septal serotonin depletion in rats facilitates working memory in the radial arm maze and increases hippocampal high-frequency theta activity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 734, 105–113. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Marsh J. E., Beaman C. P., Hughes R. W., Jones D. M. (2012). Inhibitory control in memory: evidence for negative priming in free recall. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 38, 1377–1388. 10.1037/a0027849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Martijn C., Alleva J. M., Jansen A. (2015). Improving body satisfaction do strategies targeting the automatic system work? Eur. Psychol. 20, 62–71. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000206 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. McCabe C., Mishor Z., Cowen P. J., Harmer C. J. (2010). Diminished neural processing of aversive and rewarding stimuli during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment. Biol. Psychiatry 67, 439–445. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Meneses A. (2013). 5-HT systems: emergent targets for memory formation and memory alterations. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 629–664. 10.1515/revneuro-2013-0026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Meneses A., Gasbarri A. (2016). Editorial: serotonin and memory. Front. Pharmacol. 7:8. 10.3389/fphar.2016.00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Meneses A., Perez-Garcia G., Ponce-Lopez T., Tellez R., Castillo C. (2011). Serotonin transporter and memory. Neuropharmacology 61, 355–363. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.01.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Mlinar B., Stocca G., Corradetti R. (2015). Endogenous serotonin facilitates hippocampal long-term potentiation at CA3/CA1 synapses. J. Neural Transm. 122, 177–185. 10.1007/s00702-014-1246-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Mohr H. M., Zimmermann J., Röder C., Lenz C., Overbeck G., Grabhorn R. (2010). Separating two components of body image in anorexia nervosa using fMRI. Psychol. Med. 40, 1519–1529. 10.1017/S0033291709991826 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Morici J. F., Ciccia L., Malleret G., Gingrich J. A., Bekinschtein P., Weisstaub N. V. (2015). Serotonin 2a receptor and serotonin la receptor interact within the medial prefrontal cortex during recognition memory in mice. Front. Pharmacol. 6:298. 10.3389/fphar.2015.00298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Mustelin L., Silén Y., Raevuori A., Hoek H. W., Kaprio J., Keski-Rahkonen A. (2016). The DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa may change its population prevalence and prognostic value. J. Psychiatry Res. 77, 85–91. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Nakamura M., Ueno S., Sano A., Tanabe H. (2000). The human serotonin transporter gene linked polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) shows ten novel allelic variants. Mol. Psychiatry 5, 32–38. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Nikitin V. P., Solntseva S. V., Kozyrev S. A. (2016). Dynamics of the development of amnesia caused by disruption of memory reconsolidation by neurotransmitter receptors antagonists. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 160, 596–600. 10.1007/s10517-016-3226-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. O'Hara C. B., Campbell I. C., Schmidt U. (2015). A reward-centred model of anorexia nervosa: a focussed narrative review of the neurological and psychophysiological literature. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 52, 131–152. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ohmura Y., Yoshida T., Konno K., Minami M., Watanabe M., Yoshioka M. (2015). Serotonin 5-HT7 receptor in the ventral hippocampus modulates the retrieval of fear memory and stress-induced defecation. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1093/ijnp/pyv131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Olivier J. D., Jans L. A., Blokland A., Broers N. J., Homberg J. R., Ellenbroek B. A., et al. (2009). Serotonin transporter deficiency in rats contributes to impaired object memory. Genes Brain Behav. 8, 829–834. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00530.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Pazzaglia M., Zantedeschi M. (2016). Plasticity and awareness of bodily distortion. Neural Plast. 2016:9834340. 10.1155/2016/9834340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Peng S., Yu S., Wang Q., Kang Q., Zhang Y., Zhang R., et al. (2016). Dopamine receptor D2 and catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphisms associated with anorexia nervosa in Chinese Han population DRD2 and COMT gene polymorphisms were associated with AN. Neurosci. Lett. 616, 147–151. 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.01.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Price J. S., Strong J., Eliassen J., McQueeny T., Miller M., Padula C. B., et al. (2013). Serotonin transporter gene moderates associations between mood, memory and hippocampal volume. Behav. Brain Res. 242, 158–165. 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.11.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Restivo L., Roman F., Dumuis A., Bockaert J., Marchetti E., Ammassari-Teule M. (2008). The promnesic effect of G-protein-coupled 5-HT(4) receptors activation is mediated by a potentiation of learning-induced spine growth in the mouse hippocampus. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 2427–2434. 10.1038/sj.npp.1301644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Richter-Levin G., Segal M. (1990). Effects of serotonin releasers on dentate granule cell excitability in the rat. Exp. Brain Res. 82, 199–207. 10.1007/BF00230852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Riva G. (2007). Virtual body, real pain: the allocentric lock hypothesis, in Body Representation Workshop, eds Zampini M., Pavani F. (Rovereto: Università degli Studi di Trento; ). Available online at: http://www.cimec.unitn.it/events/brw/Poster/107_abs_GIUSEPPE_RIVA.pdf [Google Scholar]
  83. Riva G. (2011). The key to unlocking the virtual body: virtual reality in the treatment of obesity and eating disorders. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 5, 283–292. 10.1177/193229681100500213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Riva G. (2012). Neuroscience and eating disorders: the allocentric lock hypothesis. Med. Hypotheses 78, 254–257. 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.10.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Riva G. (2014). Out of my real body: cognitive neuroscience meets eating disorders. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:236. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Riva G., Gaudio S. (2012). Allocentric lock in anorexia nervosa: New evidences from neuroimaging studies. Med. Hypotheses 79, 113–117. 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.03.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Riva G., Gaudio S., Dakanalis A. (2015). The neuropsychology of self objectification. Eur. Psychol. 20, 34–43. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000190 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Roberts A. J., Hedlund P. B. (2012). The 5-HT(7) receptor in learning and memory. Hippocampus 22, 762–771. 10.1002/hipo.20938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Sachdev P., Mondraty N., Wen W., Gulliford K. (2008). Brains of anorexia nervosa patients process self-images differently from non-self-images: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 46, 2161–2168. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Sarkisyan G., Hedlund P. B. (2009). The 5-HT7 receptor is involved in allocentric spatial memory information processing. Behav. Brain Res. 202, 26–31. 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Sato Y., Saito N., Utsumi A., Aizawa E., Shoji T., Izumiyama M., et al. (2013). Neural basis of impaired cognitive flexibility in patients with anorexia nervosa. PLoS ONE 8:e61108. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Segal J., Schenkel L. C., Oliveira M. H., Salum G. A., Bau C. H., Manfro G. G., et al. (2009). Novel allelic variants in the human serotonin transporter gene linked polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) among depressed patients with suicide attempt. Neurosci. Lett. 451, 79–82. 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Serino S., Dakanalis A., Santino G., Carrà G., Cipresso P., Clerici M., et al. (2016). Out of body, out of space: impaired reference frame processing in eating disorders. Psychiatr. Res. 230, 732–734. 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.10.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Seth A. K., Suzuki K., Critchley H. D. (2012). An interoceptive predictive coding model of conscious presence. Front. Psychol. 2:395. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Sigmund J. C., Vogler C., Huynh K. D., de Quervain D. J., Papassotiropoulos A. (2008). Fine-mapping at the HTR2A locus reveals multiple episodic memory-related variants. Biol. Psychol. 79, 239–242. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Sivamaruthi B. S., Madhumita R., Balamurugan K., Rajan K. E. (2015). Cronobacter sakazakii infection alters serotonin transporter and improved fear memory retention in the rat. Front. Pharmacol. 6:188. 10.3389/fphar.2015.00188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Smets J., Wessel I., Raes F. (2014). Reduced autobiographical memory specificity relates to weak resistance to proactive interference. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 45, 234–241. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Södersten P., Bergh C., Leon M., Zandian M. (2016). Dopamine and anorexia nervosa. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 60, 26–30. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Su X., Liang H., Yuan W., Olsen J., Cnattingius S., Li J. (2016). Prenatal and early life stress and risk of eating disorders in adolescent girls and young women. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 25, 1245–1253. 10.1007/s00787-016-0848-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Suchan B., Bauser D. S., Busch M., Schulte D., Grönemeyer D., Herpertz S., et al. (2013). Reduced connectivity between the left fusiform body area and the extrastriate body area in anorexia nervosa is associated with body image distortion. Behav. Brain Res. 241, 80–85. 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Suchan B., Vocks S., Waldorf M. (2015). Alterations in activity, volume, and connectivity of body-processing brain areas in anorexia nervosa. Eur. Psychol. 20, 27–33. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000213 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Swami V. (2015). Cultural influences on body size ideals unpacking the impact of westernization and modernization. Eur. Psychol. 20, 44–51. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000150 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Tylka T. L. (2011). Refinement of the tripartite influence model for men: dual body image pathways to body change behaviors. Body Image 8, 199–207. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Uher R., Murphy T., Friederich H. C., Dalgleish T., Brammer M. J., Giampietro V., et al. (2005). Functional neuroanatomy of body shape perception in healthy and eating-disordered women. Biol. Psychiatry 58, 990–997. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. van den Berg P., Thompson J. K., Obremski-Brandon K., Coovert M. (2002). The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance: a covariance structure modeling investigation testing the mediational role of appearance comparison. J. Psychosom. Res. 53, 1007–1020. 10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00499-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Vann S. D., Aggleton J. P., Maguire E. A. (2009). What does the retrosplenial cortex do? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 792–802. 10.1038/nrn2733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Vann S. D., Aggleton J. P. (2005). Selective dysgranular retrosplenial cortex lesions in rats disrupt allocentric performance of the radial-arm maze task. Behav. Neurosci. 119, 1682–1686. 10.1037/0735-7044.119.6.1682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Vocks S., Schulte D., Busch M., Grönemeyer D., Herpertz S., Suchan B. (2011). Changes in neuronal correlates of body image processing by means of cognitive-behavioural body image therapy for eating disorders: a randomized controlled fMRI study. Psychol. Med. 41, 1651–1663. 10.1017/S0033291710002382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Wu Z. M., Zheng C. H., Zhu Z. H., Wu F. T., Ni G. L., Liang Y. (2016). SiRNA-mediated serotonin transporter knockdown in the dorsal raphe nucleus rescues single prolonged stress-induced hippocampal autophagy in rats. J. Neurol. Sci. 360, 133–140. 10.1016/j.jns.2015.11.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Zhang G. L., Ásgeirsdóttir H. N., Cohen S. J., Munchow A. H., Barrera M. P., Stackman R. W. (2013). Stimulation of serotonin 2A receptors facilitates consolidation and extinction of fear memory in C57BL/6J mice. Neuropharmacology 64, 403–413. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Zhang G., Cinalli D., Cohen S. J., Knapp K. D., Rios L. M., Martínez-Hernández J., et al. (2016). Examination of the hippocampal contribution to serotonin 5-HT2A receptor-mediated facilitation of object memory in C57BL/6J mice. Neuropharmacology 109, 332–340. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.04.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES