Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Nov 23;4(6):e01322-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01322-16

Draft Genome Sequence of Salmonella enterica subsp. diarizonae Serovar 61:k:1,5,(7) Strain CRJJGF_00165 (Phylum Gammaproteobacteria)

Sushim K Gupta a, Elizabeth A McMillan a,b, Charlene R Jackson a, Prerak T Desai c, Steffen Porwollik c, Michael McClelland c, Lari M Hiott a, Shaheen B Humayoun a, John B Barrett a, Jonathan G Frye a,
PMCID: PMC5122689  PMID: 27881547

Abstract

Here, we report a 4.78-Mb draft genome sequence of the Salmonella enterica subsp. diarizonae serovar 61:k:1,5,(7) strain CRJJGF_00165 [also called S. enterica subsp. IIIb serovar 61:k:1,5,(7) strain CRJJGF_00165], isolated from ground beef in 2007.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The diphasic flagellar antigens of Salmonella enterica subsp. diarizonae serovar 61:k:1,5,(7) strain CRJJGF_00165 [or S. enterica subsp. IIIb serovar 61:k:1,5,(7) strain CRJJGF_00165] distinguishes it from the phylogenetically distinct monophasic S. enterica subsp. IIIa serovar 61:k:1,5,(7) (1). S. enterica subsp. IIIb serovar 61:k:1,5,(7) is mostly associated with reptiles (2); however, it has been reported in beef, domestic poultry, humans, sheep, and wild birds (37). S. enterica subsp. IIIb is considered to be of low pathogenicity to humans; however, it has been isolated from ill humans and has the potential to be pathogenic. Here, we announce the whole-genome shotgun data of an S. enterica subsp. IIIb strain isolated from ground beef in 2007.

S. enterica subsp. IIIb serovar 61:k:1,5,(7) strain CRJJGF_00165 was isolated from ground beef using standard microbiology techniques. SMART-PCR was used to serotype this isolate (8), and the isolate was serotyped with the antigenic formula 61:k:1,5,(7). Susceptibility testing for the strain was performed using broth microdilution plates for the Sensititre semiautomated antimicrobial susceptibility system (TREK Diagnostic Systems, Inc, Westlake, OH, USA), and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines were used to interpret the susceptibility results (9).

Genomic DNA from an overnight culture was isolated using the GenElute bacterial genomic DNA kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). DNA libraries were constructed using the Nextera XT DNA preparation kit, and paired-end sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using a 500-cycle MiSeq reagent kit. A total of 3,848,000 reads were generated. Reads were de novo assembled using Velvet (10) into 108 contigs ≥200 bp with 74-fold average coverage. The combined length of the contigs was 4,782,502 bp with a G+C content of 51.36% and an N50 value of 119.5 kb. The contigs were ordered with Mauve (11) using the Salmonella LT2 genome sequences as references, and coding sequences (CDSs) and tRNAs were predicted with Prodigal (12) and ARAGORN (13), respectively. A total of 4,456 coding sequences (≥50 amino acids) and 53 tRNAs were predicted within the genome. Signal peptides, CRISPR regions, and prophages were predicted using Signalp (14), CRISPRFinder (15), and PHAST (16), respectively. We identified signal peptides in 425 CDSs; one CRISPR locus and no phages were detected in the analyzed contigs. Although this strain was susceptible to all the tested antibiotics, a cryptic aminoglycoside resistance gene, aac6-Iy, was detected with ARG-ANNOT (17). The genome data generated for S. enterica subsp. IIIb can be helpful to understand why this subspecies does not circulate widely in warm-blooded vertebrate populations, even though it colonizes the intestinal tracks of warm-blooded vertebrates quite well.

Accession number(s).

The genome sequence of S. enterica subsp. IIIb serovar 61:k:1,5,(7) strain CRJJGF_00165 has been deposited in GenBank (NCBI) under the accession number JQYQ00000000. The version described here is the first version.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

J.G.F. and C.R.J. were supported by USDA project numbers 6040-32000-006-00 and 6040-32000-009-00 and by a grant from the American Meat Institute Foundation. M.M. was supported in part by NIH grants R01AI052237, AI039557, AI052237, AI073971, AI075093, AI077645, and AI083646; USDA grants 2009-03579 and 2011-67017-30127; the Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund; and by a grant from the Center for Produce Safety. We also thank Calvin Williams for all the technical support.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Footnotes

Citation Gupta SK, McMillan EA, Jackson CR, Desai PT, Porwollik S, McClelland M, Hiott LM, Humayoun SB, Barrett JB, Frye JG. 2016. Draft genome sequence of Salmonella enterica subsp. diarizonae serovar 61:k:1,5,(7) strain CRJJGF_00165 (phylum Gammaproteobacteria). Genome Announc 4(6):e01322-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01322-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Crosa JH, Brenner DJ, Ewing WH, Falkow S. 1973. Molecular relationships among the Salmonelleae. J Bacteriol 115:307–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schröter M, Roggentin P, Hofmann J, Speicher A, Laufs R, Mack D. 2004. Pet snakes as a reservoir for Salmonella enterica subsp. diarizonae (serogroup IIIb): a prospective study. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:613–615. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.1.613-615.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alvseike O, Skjerve E. 2002. Prevalence of a Salmonella subspecies diarizonae in Norwegian sheep herds. Prev Vet Med 52:277–285. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(01)00252-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alvseike O, Vardund T, Lindstedt B, Heir E, Eriksson E, Kapperud G. 2004. Molecular epidemiology and population genetics of Salmonella subspecies diarizonae in sheep in Norway and Sweden. Epidemiol Infect 132:253–261. doi: 10.1017/S0950268803001717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Crespo R, Jeffrey JS, Chin RP, Sentíes-Cué G, Shivaprasad HL. 2004. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Salmonella arizonae from an integrated turkey operation. Avian Dis 48:344–350. doi: 10.1637/7116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shivaprasad HL, Cortes P, Crespo R. 2006. Otitis interna (labyrinthitis) associated with Salmonella enterica arizonae in turkey poults. Avian Dis 50:135–138. doi: 10.1637/7379-051205R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arslan S, Eyi A. 2010. Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella species in retail meat products. J Food Prot 73:1613–1617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leader BT, Frye JG, Hu J, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Boyle DS. 2009. High-throughput molecular determination of Salmonella enterica serovars by use of multiplex PCR and capillary electrophoresis analysis. J Clin Microbiol 47:1290–1299. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02095-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2015. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 25th informational supplement (m100-s25). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rissman AI, Mau B, Biehl BS, Darling AE, Glasner JD, Perna NT. 2009. Reordering contigs of draft genomes using the Mauve Aligner. Bioinformatics 25:2071–2073. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2011. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 8:785–786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. 2007. CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W52–W57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. 2011. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W347–W352. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gupta SK, Padmanabhan BR, Diene SM, Lopez-Rojas R, Kempf M, Landraud L, Rolain JM. 2014. ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:212–220. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01310-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES