Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2016 Oct 28;119(10):1049–1051. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309926

The functional pluralism of fibroblasts in the infarcted myocardium

Nikolaos G Frangogiannis 1
PMCID: PMC5123771  NIHMSID: NIHMS820513  PMID: 27789580

The mammalian heart contains a large population of interstitial fibroblast-like cells; in the adult mouse myocardium 10%-30% of myocardial cells were identified as fibroblasts 1,2. These cells expand following injury, and play an important role in cardiac repair 3, but may also participate in the pathogenesis of adverse post-infarction remodeling 4. Traditional views consider cardiac fibroblasts as matrix-producing cells that simply serve to preserve the structural integrity of the ventricle following acute myocardial infarction by replacing dead cardiomyocytes with scar tissue, and contribute to cardiac fibrosis in pathophysiologic conditions associated with chronic pressure overload or metabolic dysfunction 5,6. However, this unidimensional view is not an accurate reflection of fibroblast function. A growing body of in vitro findings and in vivo observations suggests that fibroblasts exhibit a remarkable functional pluralism. In addition to their established role in matrix synthesis and metabolism, fibroblasts are also capable of secreting a wide range of immunoregulatory, cytoprotective, and angiogenic mediators in response to microenvironmental changes.

In adult mammals, sudden death of myocardial cells overwhelms the negligible regenerative reserve of the myocardium; as a result, the infarcted heart heals through formation of a collagen-based scar. Repair of the infarcted myocardium is dependent on timely activation and repression of an inflammatory reaction that serves to clear the infarct from dead cells and matrix debris. Inflammation following myocardial infarction is activated through the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from dying cells and degraded matrix 7. These “danger signals” have been reported to activate all cell types involved in cardiac injury and repair. Cardiac fibroblasts respond to DAMPs, and can produce large amounts of chemokines and cytokines that may play an important role in activation of the post-infarction inflammatory response 8. Moreover, it has been suggested that cardiac fibroblasts may modulate pro-survival signaling cascades in ischemic cardiomyocytes, affecting their susceptibility to apoptosis or necrosis. Unfortunately, these intriguing concepts on the role of fibroblasts in myocardial disease are currently supported almost exclusively by in vitro experiments and by associative evidence 9,7,10. Considering the wide range of cell types capable of responding to danger signals triggering the inflammatory reaction following myocardial infarction, the relative significance of fibroblasts remains unclear. Dissection and documentation of the role of fibroblasts as cellular effectors of myocardial inflammation has been hampered by the challenges in development of fibroblast-specific targeting approaches in vivo 11.

In the current issue of Circulation Research, Woodall and co-workers 12 provide the first direct in vivo evidence supporting a crucial role for cardiac fibroblasts in regulating cardiomyocyte survival and in triggering the inflammatory response following myocardial infarction. The authors generated mice with fibroblast-specific loss of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), a ubiquitous member of the GRK family with a central role in signal transduction. In a model of reperfused myocardial infarction, fibroblast-specific GRK-2 loss reduced the size of the infarct, decreasing secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and attenuating cardiomyocyte apoptosis. In vitro, GRK2 loss attenuated nuclear translocation of nuclear factor (NF)-kB and subsequent TNF-α synthesis in isolated fibroblasts. Moreover, conditioned media from fibroblasts lacking GRK2 potentiated Akt signaling in cardiomyocytes, suggesting activation of a cytoprotective pathway. Although the study provides the first direct documentation of a crucial role for cardiac fibroblasts in regulating cardiomyocyte injury and inflammation in the early stages following myocardial ischemia, the molecular mechanisms responsible for the observed effects remain unclear.

Do cardiac fibroblasts in the ischemic myocardium function as inflammatory cells?

Following myocardial infarction, release of DAMPs activates innate immune signaling pathways in several different cell types, triggering an intense inflammatory reaction. Endothelial cells, leukocytes, mast cells and surviving cardiomyocytes have been suggested as likely cellular targets of DAMPs released by necrotic cells, and may contribute to activation of the post-infarction inflammatory response by secreting cytokines and chemokines 13,14,15. Cardiac fibroblasts are also capable of secreting large amounts of pro-inflammatory mediators upon stimulation with danger signals. Interleukin (IL)-1 is rapidly released in the infarcted myocardium and promotes a pro-inflammatory and matrix-degrading fibroblast phenotype, while suppressing α-smooth muscle actin synthesis and inhibiting myofibroblast conversion 9. Thus, IL-1 stimulation may delay premature infiltration of the infarct with matrix-synthetic fibroblasts, until the wound is cleared from dead cells and matrix debris. Although the findings of the current study are consistent with an important role of cardiac fibroblasts in promoting inflammation following myocardial infarction, the protective effects of GRK2 loss may not be due to direct anti-inflammatory actions. Fibroblast-specific GRK2 loss decreased neutrophil infiltration in vivo and reduced TNF-α release in vitro. However, the in vivo attenuation of the inflammatory response may represent an epiphenomenon reflecting the significant reduction in infarct size, in the absence of a primary role of GRK2 in regulation of inflammation. The notion that GRK2 may be directly involved in activation of a pro-inflammatory program is not supported by studies in immune cells. In vivo and in vitro investigations in T cells 16 and in myeloid cells 17, suggested that GRK2 not only does not stimulate inflammatory gene synthesis, but may be involved in negative regulation of inflammation.

Fibroblasts may regulate cardiomyocyte survival

A growing body of evidence suggests that in injured and remodeling hearts, fibroblasts critically regulate cardiomyocyte responses. In the pressure-overloaded myocardium, activated fibroblasts transduce hypertrophic signals 18 mediated, at least in part, through secretion of miRNA-enriched exosomes 19. In myocardial ischemia, administration of the secretome of neonatal cardiac fibroblasts prior to reperfusion significantly reduced the size of the infarct 10. The current investigation suggests that endogenous fibroblast GRK2 signaling may extend ischemic injury, accentuating cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Several mechanisms may account for the pro-apoptotic effects of activated fibroblasts during the early post-ischemic phase (Figure 1). First, fibroblasts may secrete soluble pro-apoptotic mediators, such as pro-inflammatory cytokines, thus promoting cardiomyocyte death. Second, fibroblasts may indirectly reduce cardiomyocyte survival by modulating the composition of the extracellular matrix through secretion of proteases. Protease-mediated degradation of the pericellular extracellular matrix may deprive ischemic cardiomyocytes from essential pro-survival signals. Third, ischemic fibroblasts may secrete exosomes that activate pro-apoptotic pathways in cardiomyocytes. Finally, activation of GRK2 in ischemic fibroblasts may inhibit a yet unidentified pro-survival mechanism that may involve fibroblast-derived secretion of soluble mediators, or deposition of matricellular proteins. Unfortunately, the current study did not systematically pursue the mechanisms responsible for these intriguing interactions between fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cardiac fibroblasts are not unidimensional matrix-secreting cells, but exhibit remarkable functional pluralism. Following myocardial infarction, release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) by necrotic cardiomyocytes (CM) activates a pro-inflammatory phenotype in fibroblasts, inducing secretion of cytokines and chemokines, and stimulating leukocyte (L) infiltration. Moreover, during the early post-ischemic period, fibroblasts may modulate survival pathways in cardiomyocytes, affecting their susceptibility to ischemic death. These effects may be mediated through secretion of soluble pro- or anti-apoptotic mediators by fibroblasts, via release of exosomes containing miRNAs, or through modulation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) by fibroblast-derived matrix-metalloproteinases (MMPs). MMP-mediated degradation of the matrix may deprive fibroblasts from essential pro-survival signals. Fibroblast GRK2 signaling may extend ischemic injury following myocardial infarction through pro-inflammatory actions, or by activating a pro-apoptotic pathway in cardiomyocytes.

The role of activated fibroblasts during the proliferative phase of infarct healing: beyond matrix synthesis

Clearance of the infarcted heart from dead cells and matrix debris is associated with activation of anti-inflammatory pathways, leading to suppression and resolution of the inflammatory response 20. Although cardiac fibroblasts are capable of producing large amounts of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β 21, whether they actively participate in negative regulation of the inflammatory response remains unknown. Growth factor-mediated conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts is associated with activation of a matrix-synthetic program and secretion of collagens. Deposition of structural matrix proteins is the best-documented function of myofibroblasts in healing infarcts 3. In addition to their role in scar formation, infarct myofibroblasts may also serve as an important source of growth factors and matricellular proteins, regulating the angiogenic response following myocardial infarction 22. Whether the diverse functions of infarct fibroblasts in inflammation and repair reflect activation of specific subpopulations remains unknown. Although several different developmental sources of cardiac fibroblasts have been identified in normal and injured hearts2, the functional properties of these cells have not been systematically investigated. The inducible collagen1α2-Cre driver used in the current study should target all cardiac fibroblasts, thus precluding any conclusions on distinct effects of specific subsets.

Targeting the cardiac fibroblast in the infarcted and remodeling myocardium

The consistent association between cardiac fibrosis and adverse outcome in a wide range of cardiac conditions has suggested that the fibroblast may be a promising therapeutic target in patients with myocardial infarction or heart failure. However, unlike primary fibrotic disorders in other systems (such as systemic sclerosis or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis), in the myocardium, fibrotic remodeling often reflects a reparative process that is activated in response to cardiomyocyte injury. In conditions associated with replacement fibrosis, such as myocardial infarction, targeting the reparative functions of fibroblasts may have catastrophic consequences. Implementation of therapeutic strategies targeting fibroblasts is further complicated by the wide range of modulatory functions of fibroblasts on cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and survival, on inflammatory activation, and on angiogenesis. In vivo dissection of the diverse actions of cardiac fibroblasts following injury is crucial in order to design therapeutic strategies that target detrimental actions, without interfering with protective effects. Moreover, identification and characterization of fibroblast subsets with distinct phenotypic characteristics and functional profiles may explain the functional pluralism of fibroblasts in injured and remodeling tissues.

Acknowledgments

SOURCES OF FUNDING: Dr Frangogiannis’ laboratory is supported by NIH grants R01 HL76246 and R01 HL85440 and by grants from the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP).

Footnotes

DISCLOSURES: None

REFERENCES

  • 1.Pinto AR, Ilinykh A, Ivey MJ, Kuwabara JT, D'Antoni ML, Debuque R, Chandran A, Wang L, Arora K, Rosenthal NA, Tallquist MD. Revisiting Cardiac Cellular Composition. Circ Res. 2016;118:400–409. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ali SR, Ranjbarvaziri S, Talkhabi M, Zhao P, Subat A, Hojjat A, Kamran P, Muller AM, Volz KS, Tang Z, Red-Horse K, Ardehali R. Developmental heterogeneity of cardiac fibroblasts does not predict pathological proliferation and activation. Circ Res. 2014;115:625–635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.303794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shinde AV, Frangogiannis NG. Fibroblasts in myocardial infarction: A role in inflammation and repair. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;70C:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kaur H, Takefuji M, Ngai CY, Carvalho J, Bayer J, Wietelmann A, Poetsch A, Hoelper S, Conway SJ, Mollmann H, Looso M, Troidl C, Offermanns S, Wettschureck N. Targeted Ablation of Periostin-Expressing Activated Fibroblasts Prevents Adverse Cardiac Remodeling in Mice. Circ Res. 2016;118:1906–1917. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kong P, Christia P, Frangogiannis NG. The pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:549–574. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1349-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Travers JG, Kamal FA, Robbins J, Yutzey KE, Blaxall BC. Cardiac Fibrosis: The Fibroblast Awakens. Circ Res. 2016;118:1021–1040. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang W, Lavine KJ, Epelman S, Evans SA, Weinheimer CJ, Barger PM, Mann DL. Necrotic myocardial cells release damage-associated molecular patterns that provoke fibroblast activation in vitro and trigger myocardial inflammation and fibrosis in vivo. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smith RS, Smith TJ, Blieden TM, Phipps RP. Fibroblasts as sentinel cells. Synthesis of chemokines and regulation of inflammation. Am J Pathol. 1997;151:317–322. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saxena A, Chen W, Su Y, Rai V, Uche OU, Li N, Frangogiannis NG. IL-1 Induces Proinflammatory Leukocyte Infiltration and Regulates Fibroblast Phenotype in the Infarcted Myocardium. J Immunol. 2013;191:4838–4848. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abrial M, Da Silva CC, Pillot B, Augeul L, Ivanes F, Teixeira G, Cartier R, Angoulvant D, Ovize M, Ferrera R. Cardiac fibroblasts protect cardiomyocytes against lethal ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;68:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kong P, Christia P, Saxena A, Su Y, Frangogiannis NG. Lack of specificity of fibroblast-specific protein 1 in cardiac remodeling and fibrosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;305:H1363–H1372. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00395.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Woodall MC, Woodall BP, Ghao E, Yuan A, Koch WJ. Cardiac fibroblast GRK2 deletion enhances contractility and remodeling following ischemia/reperfusion injury. Circ Res. 2016 doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309538. (in press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Arslan F, Smeets MB, O'Neill LA, Keogh B, McGuirk P, Timmers L, Tersteeg C, Hoefer IE, Doevendans PA, Pasterkamp G, de Kleijn DP. Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury is mediated by leukocytic toll-like receptor-2 and reduced by systemic administration of a novel anti-toll-like receptor-2 antibody. Circulation. 2010;121:80–90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.880187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Frangogiannis NG, Lindsey ML, Michael LH, Youker KA, Bressler RB, Mendoza LH, Spengler RN, Smith CW, Entman ML. Resident cardiac mast cells degranulate and release preformed TNF-alpha, initiating the cytokine cascade in experimental canine myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. Circulation. 1998;98:699–710. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.7.699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu M, Goetsch SC, Wang Z, Luo R, Hill JA, Schneider J, Morris SM, Jr, Liu ZP. FoxO4 Promotes Early Inflammatory Response Upon Myocardial Infarction via Endothelial Arg1. Circ Res. 2015;117:967–977. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vroon A, Heijnen CJ, Lombardi MS, Cobelens PM, Mayor F, Jr, Caron MG, Kavelaars A. Reduced GRK2 level in T cells potentiates chemotaxis and signaling in response to CCL4. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;75:901–909. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0403136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Patial S, Saini Y, Parvataneni S, Appledorn DM, Dorn GW, 2nd, Lapres JJ, Amalfitano A, Senagore P, Parameswaran N. Myeloid-specific GPCR kinase-2 negatively regulates NF-kappaB1p105-ERK pathway and limits endotoxemic shock in mice. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226:627–637. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Takeda N, Manabe I, Uchino Y, Eguchi K, Matsumoto S, Nishimura S, Shindo T, Sano M, Otsu K, Snider P, Conway SJ, Nagai R. Cardiac fibroblasts are essential for the adaptive response of the murine heart to pressure overload. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:254–265. doi: 10.1172/JCI40295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bang C, Batkai S, Dangwal S, Gupta SK, Foinquinos A, Holzmann A, Just A, Remke J, Zimmer K, Zeug A, Ponimaskin E, Schmiedl A, Yin X, Mayr M, Halder R, Fischer A, Engelhardt S, Wei Y, Schober A, Fiedler J, Thum T. Cardiac fibroblast-derived microRNA passenger strand-enriched exosomes mediate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:2136–2146. doi: 10.1172/JCI70577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Prabhu SD, Frangogiannis NG. The Biological Basis for Cardiac Repair After Myocardial Infarction: From Inflammation to Fibrosis. Circ Res. 2016;119:91–112. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Driesen RB, Nagaraju CK, Abi-Char J, Coenen T, Lijnen PJ, Fagard RH, Sipido KR, Petrov VV. Reversible and irreversible differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiovasc Res. 2014;101:411–422. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvt338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dostal D, Glaser S, Baudino TA. Cardiac fibroblast physiology and pathology. Compr Physiol. 2015;5:887–909. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c140053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES