Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 11.
Published in final edited form as: Langmuir. 2016 Sep 26;32(40):10394–10401. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02538

Plasmon-Enhanced Photocleaving Dynamics in Colloidal MicroRNA-Functionalized Silver Nanoparticles Monitored with Second Harmonic Generation

Raju R Kumal , Mohammad Abu-Laban , Corey R Landry , Blake Kruger , Zhenyu Zhang , Daniel J Hayes §, Louis H Haber †,*
PMCID: PMC5124014  NIHMSID: NIHMS829912  PMID: 27605308

Abstract

The photocleaving dynamics of colloidal micro-RNA-functionalized nanoparticles are studied using time-dependent second harmonic generation (SHG) measurements. Model drug-delivery systems composed of oligonucleotides attached to either silver nanoparticles or polystyrene nanoparticles using a nitrobenzyl photocleavable linker are prepared and characterized. The photoactivated controlled release is observed to be most efficient on resonance at 365 nm irradiation, with pseudo-first-order rate constants that are linearly proportional to irradiation powers. Additionally, silver nanoparticles show a 6-fold plasmon enhancement in photocleaving efficiency over corresponding polystyrene nanoparticle rates, while our previous measurements on gold nanoparticles show a 2-fold plasmon enhancement compared to polystyrene nanoparticles. Characterizations including extinction spectroscopy, electrophoretic mobility, and fluorimetry measurements confirm the analysis from the SHG results. The real-time SHG measurements are shown to be a highly sensitive method for investigating plasmon-enhanced photocleaving dynamics in model drug delivery systems.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms829912f11.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Short nucleic acids such as microRNA (miRNA) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) play a significant role in posttranscriptional gene regulation, silencing, and profiling.13 These short RNA molecules are important in classifying and controlling tumor growth and cell differentiation, as well as other biological processes.46 In order to use miRNA or siRNA as a therapeutic, it is important that the oligonucleotides are protected before entering the bloodstream to avoid degradation.79 One approach for oligonucleotide protection involves modification with a bifunctional photolinker that connects to a colloidal metallic nanoparticle through a thiol bond.10,11 Photocleaving of the photolinker then releases the active oligonucleotide from the nanoparticle surface, leading to the corresponding regulation of gene expression.12 Although similar systems have been developed for programmed release, light activation is especially desirable because it provides a high degree of spatial and temporal control of miRNA delivery.10,13

Metallic nanoparticles such as gold nanoparticles (GNPs) and silver nanoparticles (SNPs) are promising for biological applications due to their biocompatibility, ease of synthesis, and convenient chemical functionalization with drug, oligonucleotide, and protein molecules.1416 Gold and silver nanoparticles have surface plasmon resonances characterized by the coherent oscillation of free electrons upon interaction with incident light leading to the enhancement of optical scattering and absorption processes.1721 These nanoparticles are also ideally suited for contrasting agents, cellular imaging, and exothermic reactors.22,23 Additionally, silver nanoparticles have wound healing antimicrobial activities,24 demonstrate negligible cytotoxicities in small doses,25,26 and can be utilized for drug-delivery applications in photoactivated gene silencing.27,28 Plasmonic release of oligonucleotides has been studied from the surface of colloidal gold nanoparticles.2932 Previously, we have investigated the kinetics of photoactivated controlled-release of miRNA from the surface of colloidal gold nanoparticles using time-resolved second harmonic generation (SHG).33

Nonlinear optical spectroscopy is a powerful surface-sensitive method for probing phenomena in biology and nanotechnology.3440 Second harmonic generation is a nonlinear spectroscopy that is especially useful for probing the surface of colloidal nanoparticles.4149 In SHG, two incident photons of frequency ω combine to produce a photon of frequency 2ω. Second harmonic generation is dipole forbidden in centrosymmetric bulk media, but it can be generated from the colloidal nanoparticle surface where the inversion symmetry is broken. The SHG signal from a charged interface has contributions from the second-order and third-order nonlinear susceptibilities, χ(2) and χ(3), respectively. The χ(2) term originates from the surface-specific two-photon spectroscopy of the nanoparticle, while the χ(3) term depends upon the polarization of the bulk solvent molecules induced by the electric field of the nanoparticle surface. The SHG electric field, ESHG, is proportional to the square root of the intensity of the SHG signal, with5058

ESHG=χ(2)EωEω+χ(3)EωEωϕ0

where Eω is the electric field of the incident laser beam with frequency ω and ϕ0 is the electrostatic surface potential of the nanoparticle.

In this paper, the efficiency of light-activated release of oligonucleotides from the surface of silver, gold, and polystyrene nanoparticles are compared by using SHG spectroscopy. The size of the nanoparticles are all roughly 65 nm diameter, and they are functionalized with miRNA-148b and a nitrobenzyl photocleaveable (PC) linker. Additional information on the miRNA functionalization of the colloidal nanoparticles is described in the Supporting Information. The functionalized nanoparticles are irradiated with varying laser powers and wavelengths and are simultaneously probed by SHG from 800 nm laser pulses to study the kinetics of the photocleaving process. The probe laser itself shows no photoreleasing effect on the sample. Careful analysis of the power and wavelength dependent data shows that the photolysis is a one-photon process. By comparing the releasing rates of oligonucleotides from three different nanoparticles, it is found that the photolysis is enhanced by the plasmon of the silver nanoparticle. The SHG studies at different laser powers and wavelengths are directly compared to corresponding fluorescence quantification measurements and extinction spectra for each sample and experimental condition.

SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF NANOPARTICLES

The colloidal silver nanoparticles are prepared in water by reduction of silver nitrate using citrate and ascorbic acid in the presence of potassium iodide,59 followed by miRNA functionalization. Briefly, an aqueous solution of 2.54 mL containing 5.91 mM silver nitrate, 13.4 mM sodium citrate, and 1.54 µM potassium iodide is added to 47.5 mL of 210 µM ascorbic acid in nanopure water under boiling and vigorous stirring conditions. The solution is boiled for an hour during which the color changes from colorless to light yellow resulting in relatively monodisperse, spherical, colloidal silver nanoparticles. miRNA is functionalized to the surface of nanoparticles via a “salt-aging” technique as described previously,10,33 where 2.5 µL of 0.8 µg/µL miRNA (PC-miR-148b) labeled with a 6-TAMRA fluorophore group and modified with a thiolized photocleaveable spacer is added to 1 mL of the silver nanoparticle solution. The samples are then left to incubate under gentle agitation conditions for a 24 h period. After incubation, 10 µL of 0.035 M sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution and 20 µL of 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution are added to each sample of colloidal nanoparticles, followed by an additional 3 h of incubation. Afterward, three rounds of the addition of 10 µL of 2 M Tris–sodium chloride solution with 4 h of incubation between each salting step is applied. The miRNA-functionalized nanoparticles are purified via centrifugation and finally resuspended in nanopure water.

For the polystyrene sulfate nanoparticles (PSNPs), a thiol–amine cross-linker succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC) is used to functionalize the thiolated oligo to the nanoparticle surface.60 Here, 70 µL of 1 mg/mL SMCC in dimethyl sulfoxide solvent is added to 1 mL of the 1% amine-functionalized 60 ± 5 nm PSNP aqueous solution. The SMCC–PSNP mixture is allowed to rock overnight at room temperature, then is centrifuged and resuspended in nanopure water before adding the miRNA. The same procedure for the miRNA functionalization as described above is then followed for the PSNP sample.

The nanoparticles are characterized using dynamic light scattering (DLS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), ζ-potential, fluorimetry, and extinction spectroscopy measurements. Representative TEM images of the silver nanoparticles before and after miRNA functionalization are shown in Figure 1a,b, respectively. From a survey of nanoparticle images, the average nanoparticle diameter is determined to be 65 ± 7.5 nm. Using dynamic light scattering, the hydrodynamic diameter of the SNPs before miRNA functionalization is measured to be 66 ± 18 nm, and the hydrodynamic diameter increases to 127 ± 25 nm after miRNA functionalization. Figure 2 shows the experimental extinction spectrum of the colloidal silver nanoparticles (red solid line) when compared with a Mie theory fit (black dotted line) using a concentration of 9.55 × 109 nanoparticles/mL. The localized surface plasmon peak for silver nanoparticles is observed at 424 nm. Figure 3 displays the electrophoretic mobility of nanoparticles before and after miRNA functionalization. The electrophoretic mobility of the SNPs is measured to be (−2.60 ± 0.53) × 10−8 m2/(V s) with a corresponding ζ potential of −49.80 ± 10.17 mV using Huckel’s approximation.33,61 The electrophoretic mobility of the miRNA-functionalized SNPs is measured to be (−3.86 ± 0.60) × 10−8 m2/(V s) with a corresponding ζ-potential of −74.80 ± 11.40 mV. Additional characterizations are shown in the Supporting Information.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative TEM images of (a) silver nanoparticles having size 65 ± 7.5 nm and (b) miRNA-functionalized silver nanoparticles.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Extinction spectra of 65 ± 7.5 nm colloidal silver nanoparticles in water (red line) compared with Mie theory (dotted black line).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Electrophoretic mobility plot of silver nanoparticles before and after miRNA functionalization showing the measured averages (solid and dotted black lines, respectively) and corresponding standard deviations (red and green areas, respectively).

EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

The controlled release of miRNA from the surface of colloidal nanoparticles is performed using an experimental setup, which has been previously described.39 Briefly, the experimental setup consists of an ultrafast laser system, an optical setup, and a high sensitive charged-coupled device (CCD) detector connected to a monochromator. A titanium:sapphire oscillator laser with 70 fs pulses centered at 800 nm at an 80 MHz repetition rate and an average power of 2.6 W is used. A portion of the oscillator beam passes through a beam splitter to seed the amplifier laser, and the remaining portion is used for the SHG measurements. An amplified laser (75 fs, 800 nm, 10 kHz, 7 W) pumps an optical parametric amplifier (OPA) to generate the wavelength-tunable photocleaving irradiation beam with 100 fs pulses at a 10 kHz repetition rate. For SHG measurements, the 800 nm probe laser from the oscillator is attenuated to an average power of 790 mW before being focused to a 1 cm × 1 cm quartz cuvette containing the sample at a concentration of 8.3 × 109 nanoparticles/mL. The photocleaving irradiation beam at the desired wavelength and power is directed to the sample at 90° with respect to the SHG probe laser. The SHG from the nanoparticle sample is measured as a function of time using different photocleaving irradiation wavelengths and average powers. An integrated Labview program controls a magnetic stir bar and a beam block to open and shut every 30 s in synchronization with automated data acquisition for background-subtracted time-dependent SHG measurements.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The photocleaving controlled release of miRNA from the surface of silver nanoparticles and polystyrene nanoparticles is measured in real time using second harmonic generation. The obtained results are compared with our previous studies on miRNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles.33 Representative SHG spectra of SNPs and miRNA-functionalized SNPs are shown in Figure 4a. The SHG peak from the 800 nm probe laser is located at 400 nm, as expected, with full width half-maximum of 4.5 nm. The small signal at longer wavelengths is due to the two-photon fluorescence from the SNPs. The SHG signal intensity from miRNA-functionalized SNPs is approximately four times higher than the corresponding SHG signal from the SNPs using the same laser conditions and nanoparticle concentrations. The higher SHG signal in the miRNA-functionalized SNPs is mainly attributed to the negatively charged phosphate groups of the oligonucleotides, which increase the surface charge density magnitude and the corresponding surface potential, resulting in a larger χ(3) term. This interpretation is consistent with previous work and with our earlier results on miRNA-functionalized GNPs.10,33,58,62 The 6-TAMRA fluorophore has negligible contribution to the SHG signal because it has negligible absorption near the 800 nm probe and 400 nm SHG wavelengths. Figure 4b shows representative SHG spectra from the miRNA-functionalized SNPs at different UV-irradiation times of 0, 90, and 800 s using 365 nm irradiation with a 20 mW average power. The decrease in SHG intensity under increasing UV-irradiation time is due to the photocleaving of miRNA from the colloidal SNP surface, resulting in a decrease of the nanoparticle surface charge density magnitude and a smaller χ(3) term.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) SHG spectra of the colloidal silver nanoparticles and the miRNA-functionalized silver nanoparticles. (b) SHG spectra of miRNA-functionalized colloidal silver nanoparticle sample after different UV irradiation times using 365 nm with 20 mW average power. The probe laser is fixed at 800 nm.

The results from control experiments are shown in Figure 5a where the variation of the SHG intensity as a function of the UV-irradiation time is displayed for the SNPs and the miRNA-functionalized SNPs. The SHG signal from the miRNA-functionalized SNP sample remains constant over time using the 800 nm probe laser, indicating that no photocleaving occurs from the probe laser alone. Similarly, the SHG signal from the SNP sample remains constant over time when both the 800 nm probe laser and the UV laser at 365 nm with an average power of 20 mW are used. However, the SHG intensity from the miRNA-functionalized SNP sample decreases and asymptotically reaches a minimum value when using both the probe laser and the UV laser. The minimum of the time-dependent SHG signal from the miRNA-functionalized under UV irradiation is equal to the corresponding signal of the SNPs, indicating complete photocleaving of oligonucleotides from the surface of nanoparticles.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) For control experiments, the time-dependent SHG signal remains constant for both the miRNA-functionalized SNPs using the 800 nm probe laser only (blue data) and the SNPs using the 800 nm probe and the UV laser at 365 nm (black data). The SHG of the miRNA-functionalized SNPs decreases as a function of time under irradiation with the UV laser at 365 nm (red data). (b) Time-dependent SHG measurements of the miRNA-functionalized SNPs using different UV and visible laser wavelengths at 20 mW average power to determine the photocleaving dynamics.

A wavelength-dependent study on the photocleaving process is shown in Figure 5b. The error bars are included in Figure 5a,b but are mostly smaller than the data points. The irradiation laser wavelength is varied from 300 to 500 nm, and time-dependence of the SHG signal is measured to determine the photocleaving rate under a constant average irradiation laser power of 20 mW. The fastest decay of the SHG signal is observed at 365 nm irradiation, in agreement with previous measurements on miRNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles,33 indicating the photocleaving peak resonance. Relatively rapid photocleaving kinetics are also observed at irradiation wavelengths between 345 and 460 nm. Much slower photocleaving is observed using irradiation at 330 nm, while almost no photocleaving is observed with irradiation at 300, 320, and 500 nm, which are far from the photocleaving resonance.

The wavelength-dependent photocleaving rates in the plasmonic miRNA-functionalized SNPs are compared with corresponding measurements in the nonplasmonic miRNA-functionalized polystyrene nanoparticles in order to determine the role of plasmonic enhancement of the photocleaving process. The time-dependent SHG signals from the miRNA-functionalized PSNPs are shown in Figure 6 under varying irradiation wavelengths from 300 to 500 nm at 20 mW. The photocleaving rates from the miRNA-functionalized PSNPs are lower than the corresponding photocleaving rates from the SNP sample.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Time-dependent SHG signals showing the photocleaving of miRNA-functionalized polystyrene nanoparticles using different irradiation wavelengths.

The photocleaving rate constants at different irradiation wavelengths are determined for the miRNA-functionalized SNPs and PSNPs by fitting the SHG data using a pseudo-first-order exponential rate equation, as described previously.33 The SHG electric field can be described by the equation ESHG = A + B[C], where A is an offset, B is a proportionality constant, and [C] is the cumulative concentration of miRNA attached to the surface of nanoparticles. As noted earlier, the change in ESHG as a function of attached miRNA at the nanoparticle surface is attributed mainly to the surface charge density and the resulting χ(3) term.33,58,62 Under the UV irradiation-induced photocleaving, the attached miRNA concentration should exponentially decay in time t according to the equation, [C](t) = [C]0 ekt, where [C]0 is the initial concentration of miRNA attached to the nanoparticle surface and the pseudo-first-order rate constant k′ is linearly proportional to the UV laser intensity, assuming that the photocleaving is a single-photon process.

The resulting rate constants for the miRNA-functionalized SNP and PSNP samples determined from the pseudo-first-order fits are plotted as a function of the irradiation wavelength in Figure 7. Both miRNA-functionalized nanoparticles show a maximum rate of photocleaving at 365 nm due to the characteristic resonance peak of the photocleaving process. The miRNA-functionalized SNPs show greatly enhanced photocleaving rate constants compared to the PSNPs over the irradiation wavelengths from 350 to 450 nm due to plasmon enhancement. The plasmon resonance of the SNPs cause enhanced optical fields near the nanoparticle surface leading to plasmon-enhanced photocleaving over the wavelength range of the SNP plasmon resonance, which directly overlaps with the photocleaving resonance of the nitrobenzyl linker. The PSNP sample has no associated plasmon resonance, so its rate constants are attributed to the nitrobenzyl linker alone.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Photocleaving rate constants of the miRNA-functionalized SNPs and PSNPs at different irradiation wavelengths using 20 mW average power.

The power-dependent photocleaving of the miRNA-functionalized SNPs and PSNPs is also studied for additional insight. Figure 8a shows the SHG electric field from miRNA-functionalized SNPs as a function of UV irradiation time using 365 nm at different UV laser powers. The rate constants from the miRNA-functionalized SNPs obtained at the laser powers of 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, and 75 mW are (4.9 ± 0.1) × 10−3, (8.6 ± 0.2) × 10−3, (12.4 ± 0.6) × 10−3, (16.1 ± 0.3) × 10−3, (18.0 ± 0.2) × 10−3, and (26.3 ± 0.6) × 10−3 s−1, respectively. Corresponding results from the miRNA-functionalized PSNPs are shown in the Supporting Information. The photocleaving rate constants for the miRNA-functionalized SNPs and PSNPs are plotted as a function of the UV laser average powers in Figure 8b. The error bars are included in Figure 8a,b but are mostly smaller than the data points. The previously obtained GNP data33 are included for direct comparison. The linear variation of the rate constants as a function of the UV laser power is consistent with a pseudo-first-order kinetics model, indicating that the photocleaving is a one-photon process for all nanoparticle samples investigated. The slopes obtained for miRNA-functionalized SNPs and PSNPs are (3.48 ± 0.12) × 10−4 s−1 mW−1 and (5.45 ± 0.28) × 10−5 s−1 mW−1, respectively, with corresponding y-intercepts of (1.3 ± 6.0) × 10−4 s−1 and (0.2 ± 1.4) × 10−4 s−1, respectively. Here, the y-intercepts are equal to zero to within experimental uncertainty, in agreement with the observation that no photocleaving occurs without UV irradiation. The ratios of the slopes of the change in the rate constants under changing UV laser powers for the SNPs and GNPs compared to the PSNPs provide a direct method for determining the plasmon enhancement factors. Using this method, the plasmon enhancement factors for photocleaving in the SNPs and GNPs are 6.4 ± 0.4 and 2.3 ± 0.2, respectively. The SNP enhancement is much higher because its plasmon resonance directly overlaps with the photocleaving resonance wavelength of the nitrobenzyl linker. The GNP plasmon is centered near 540 nm, and its extinction near 365 nm is dominated by the electronic interband transition,45,63 causing a decrease in the relative optical field enhancement.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

(a) Measured SHG electric field from miRNA-functionalized SNPs as a function of irradiation time with 365 nm at different UV laser average powers with corresponding exponential fits. (b) The photocleaving rate constants for the miRNA-functionalized SNPs and PSNPs under varying UV laser powers. The linear variation with laser power indicates a one-photon photocleaving process for all nanoparticle samples. Previous results from GNPs are included for comparison.

Additional characterization measurements are performed to confirm the analysis obtained from the SHG results. Figure 9 shows the extinction spectra of the SNPs, the miRNA-functionalized SNPs, and the miRNA-functionalized SNPs after laser irradiation with 330, 365, and 435 nm at an average power of 20 mW for 14 min. The plasmon peak of the SNP sample shifts from 424 to 435 nm after functionalization with miRNA due to the change in the dielectric constant at the nanoparticle surface. The plasmon peak of the miRNA-functionalized SNPs blue shifts back toward the SNP spectrum under UV laser irradiation. After 365 nm irradiation, the miRNA-functionalized SNPs plasmon spectrum closely matches the SNP spectrum, indicating complete photocleaving. The miRNA-functionalized SNP spectra deviate from the SNP after 330 and 435 nm irradiation, indicating incomplete photocleaving.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Extinction spectra of the SNPs, the miRNA-functionalized SNPs, and the miRNA-functionalized SNPs after laser irradiation with different wavelengths.

Quantification of the miRNA released from the nanoparticle surface is obtained from fluorescence measurements of the 6-TAMRA labeling fluorophore in the centrifuged supernatants following laser irradiation or chemical reduction according to the procedure described previously.33 Figure 10 shows the fluorescent signal from the miRNA-functionalized SNPs after 14 min irradiation with 20 mW average power for wavelengths ranging from 300 to 800 nm. These measurements are compared to the supernatants after the addition of dithiothreitol (DTT) for compete reduction and chemical detachment of the miRNA. Irradiation with 365 nm shows maximum photocleaving corresponding to complete release, to within experimental uncertainty. Irradiation at other wavelengths show partial photocleaving, with negligible photocleaving at 300 and 800 nm, in agreement with the SHG measurements. The concentration of the SNPs is determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). When combined with the fluorimetry measurements, the average oligonucleotide surface densities are determined to be (5.92 ± 0.76) × 10−3 and (6.18 ± 0.45) × 10−3 oligo/nm2 for the SNPs and PSNPs, respectively, corresponding to coverages of 79 ± 10 oligo/nanoparticle and 70 ± 5 oligo/nanoparticle, respectively.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Fluorescence measurements of miRNA-functionalized SNPs after DTT reduction and after using laser irradiation at different wavelengths varying from 300 to 800 nm.

CONCLUSION

The photocleaving dynamics from model oligonucleotide therapeutic delivery systems are studied using time-dependent second harmonic generation measurements. The photocleaving rates from the surface of colloidal miRNA-functionalized silver nanoparticles and polystyrene nanoparticles in water are obtained using different laser irradiation wavelengths and powers. The photocleaving rate is maximized using the irradiation wavelength of 365 nm, which is on resonance with the nitrobenzyl linker. A linear variation of the photocleaving rate constant under varying irradiation laser powers is observed, demonstrating that the associated kinetics are described by a one-photon process. The miRNA-functionalized silver nanoparticles show a plasmon enhancement factor of 6.4 ± 0.4 when compared to the photocleaving rates from corresponding measurements in the polystyrene nanoparticles. Electrophoretic mobility, extinction spectroscopy, and fluorimetry measurements are used to verify the analysis of the SHG results, which are compared to previous investigations on gold nanoparticles. Second harmonic generation is shown to be a very sensitive nonlinear optical technique for investigating real-time plasmonenhanced photocleaving for potential drug-delivery systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and Reagents

For silver nanoparticle synthesis, silver nitrate (≥99%), sodium citrate dihydrate (≥99%), potassium iodide (≥99%), phosphate buffer saline solution (PBS), sodium chloride (≥98%), anhydrous ethanol, and dithiothreitol (1 M) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and ascorbic acid (≥99%) was purchased from Sigma Life Science. Custom modified miRNA-148b was received from Trilink Bio Technologies. Diethylpyrocarbonate water was purchased from Ambion, sodium dodecyl sulfate (≥99%) from VWR, and tris(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (≥99.9%) solid from Amresco. The 1% polystyrene nanoparticle solution with amine functionalization was purchased from Nanocs, and succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (≥99%) was received from Thermo Fisher. Nanopure water with resistivity greater than 18.2 MΩ was used as a solvent during the synthesis of the miRNA-functionalized nanoparticles, as well as for spectroscopic measurements.

Characterization of Nanoparticles

ζ-Potential and dynamic light scattering measurements were taken by Zetasizer Nano ZS from Malvern Instruments Inc., UK. Fluorescence measurements were performed using a Wallac VICTOR2 V1420-040 Multilabel Counter fluorimeter and extinction measurements were done using UV/vis spectrometer from PerkinElmer, Boston, USA. The TEM images were obtained using a high resolution JEOL JEM-2011 with a Gatan SC1000 CCD camera and an EDAX EDS. The ICP-OES measurement was performed to quantify the nanoparticles using a Varian Vista-MPX, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Louisiana State University, the National Science Foundation (CBET-1254281), and the National Institute Dental and Craniofacial Research of the National Institutes of Health (RDE024790A) for generous financial support. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Caroline Copeland helped with the TOC graphic. The authors also acknowledge to Dr. Rafael Cueto for helping in dynamic light scattering and zeta potential measurements and LSU Material Characterization Center (LSUMCC) for transmission electron microscopy images.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02538.
  • Details of the sequences and the photocleaving process, fluorescence signal of the SNPs before and after miRNA functionalization, measured SHG electric fields from miRNA-functionalized PSNPs as a function of irradiation time with 365 nm at different UV laser average powers, electrophoretic mobility of the miRNA-functionalized SNPs under different UV irradiation times, and ζ potential of the miRNA-functionalized SNPs under varying UV irradiation times (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: Genomics, Biogenesis, Mechanism, and Function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA, et al. MicroRNA Expression Profiles Classify Human Cancers. Nature. 2005;435:834–838. doi: 10.1038/nature03702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Macha MA, Seshacharyulu P, Krishn SR, Pai P, Rachagani S, Jain M, Batra SK. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) as Biomarker (s) for Prognosis and Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancers. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014;20:5287–5297. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140128213117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Greene SB, Herschkowitz JI, Rosen JM. Small Players With Big Roles: MicroRNAs as Targets to Inhibit Breast Cancer Progression. Curr. Drug Targets. 2010;11:1059–1073. doi: 10.2174/138945010792006762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Reynolds A, Leake D, Boese Q, Scaringe S, Marshall WS, Khvorova A. Rational siRNA Design for RNA Interference. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004;22:326–330. doi: 10.1038/nbt936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang B, Pan X, Cobb GP, Anderson TA. MicroRNAs as Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors. Dev. Biol. 2007;302:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Muro S. Challenges in Design and Characterization of Ligand-Targeted Drug Delivery Systems. J. Controlled Release. 2012;164:125–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.05.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Verma A, Uzun O, Hu Y, Hu Y, Han H-S, Watson N, Chen S, Irvine DJ, Stellacci F. Surface-Structure-Regulated Cell-Membrane Penetration by Monolayer-Protected Nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 2013;12:376–376. doi: 10.1038/nmat2202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou J, Wu J, Hafdi N, Behr J-P, Erbacher P, Peng L. PAMAM Dendrimers for Efficient siRNA Delivery and Potent Gene Silencing. Chem. Commun. 2006;22:2362–2364. doi: 10.1039/b601381c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Qureshi AT, Monroe WT, Dasa V, Gimble JM, Hayes DJ. miR-148b–Nanoparticle Conjugates for Light Mediated Osteogenesis of Human Adipose Stromal/Stem Cells. Biomaterials. 2013;34:7799–7810. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang J, Malicka J, Gryczynski I, Lakowicz JR. Surface-Enhanced Fluorescence of Fluorescein-Labeled Oligonucleotides Capped on Silver Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005;109:7643–7648. doi: 10.1021/jp0490103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vivero-Escoto JL, Slowing II, Wu C-W, Lin VS-Y. Photoinduced Intracellular Controlled Release Drug Delivery in Human Cells by Gold-Capped Mesoporous Silica Nanosphere. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:3462–3463. doi: 10.1021/ja900025f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brown PK, Qureshi AT, Moll AN, Hayes DJ, Monroe WT. Silver Nanoscale Antisense Drug Delivery System for Photoactivated Gene Silencing. ACS Nano. 2013;7:2948–2959. doi: 10.1021/nn304868y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Thakor AS, Gambhir SS. Nanooncology: the Future of Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 2013;63:395–418. doi: 10.3322/caac.21199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Couvreur P. Nanoparticles in drug delivery: past, present and future. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2013;65:21–23. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dreaden EC, Alkilany AM, Huang X, Murphy CJ, El-Sayed MA. The Golden Age: Gold Nanoparticles for Biomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:2740–2779. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15237h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Thomas KG, Kamat PV. Chromophore-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003;36:888–898. doi: 10.1021/ar030030h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jain PK, Lee KS, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA. Calculated Absorption and Scattering Properties of Gold Nanoparticles of Different Size, Shape, and Composition: Applications in Biological Imaging and Biomedicine. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:7238–7248. doi: 10.1021/jp057170o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kelly KL, Coronado E, Zhao LL, Schatz GC. The Optical Properties of Metal Nanoparticles: the Influence of Size, Shape, and Dielectric Environment. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2003;107:668–677. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yang X, Yang M, Pang B, Vara M, Xia Y. Gold Nanomaterials at Work in Biomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:10410–10488. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yguerabide J, Yguerabide EE. Light-Scattering Submicroscopic Particles as Highly Fluorescent Analogs and Their Use as Tracer Labels in Clinical and Biological Applications: I. Theory. Anal. Biochem. 1998;262:137–156. doi: 10.1006/abio.1998.2759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hong R, Han G, Fernández JM, Kim B-j, Forbes NS, Rotello VM. Glutathione-Mediated Delivery and Release Using Monolayer Protected Nanoparticle Carriers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:1078–1079. doi: 10.1021/ja056726i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.You J, Zhang G, Li C. Exceptionally High Payload of Doxorubicin in Hollow Gold Nanospheres for Near-Infrared Light-Triggered Drug Release. ACS Nano. 2010;4:1033–1041. doi: 10.1021/nn901181c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, Kim J-H, Park SJ, Lee HJ, Kim SH, Park YK, Park YH, Hwang C-Y, et al. Antimicrobial Effects of Silver Nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2007;3:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2006.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kim YS, Kim JS, Cho HS, Rha DS, Kim JM, Park JD, Choi BS, Lim R, Chang HK, Chung YH, et al. Twenty-Eight-Day Oral Toxicity, Genotoxicity, and Gender-Related Tissue Distribution of Silver Nanoparticles in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Inhalation Toxicol. 2008;20:575–583. doi: 10.1080/08958370701874663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tiwari DK, Jin T, Behari J. Dose-Dependent In-Vivo Toxicity Assessment of Silver Nanoparticle in Wistar Rats. Toxicol. Mech. Methods. 2011;21:13–24. doi: 10.3109/15376516.2010.529184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Qureshi AT, Monroe WT, Lopez MJ, Janes ME, Dasa V, Park S, Amirsadeghi A, Hayes DJ. Biocompatible/Bioabsorbable Silver Nanocomposite Coatings. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011;120:3042–3053. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qureshi AT, Terrell L, Monroe WT, Dasa V, Janes ME, Gimble JM, Hayes DJ. Antimicrobial Biocompatible Bioscaffolds for Orthopaedic Implants. J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. 2014;8:386–395. doi: 10.1002/term.1532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Simoncelli S, de Alwis Weerasekera H, Fasciani C, Boddy CN, Aramendia PF, Alarcon EI, Scaiano JC. Thermoplasmonic ssDNA Dynamic Release from Gold Nanoparticles Examined with Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015;6:1499–1503. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Poon L, Zandberg W, Hsiao D, Erno Z, Sen D, Gates BD, Branda NR. Photothermal Release of Single-Stranded DNA From the Surface of Gold Nanoparticles Through Controlled Denaturating and Au–S Bond Breaking. ACS Nano. 2010;4:6395–6403. doi: 10.1021/nn1016346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huschka R, Neumann O, Barhoumi A, Halas NJ. Visualizing Light-Triggered Release of Molecules Inside Living Cells. Nano Lett. 2010;10:4117–4122. doi: 10.1021/nl102293b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Thibaudau F. Ultrafast Photothermal Release of DNA From Gold Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:902–907. doi: 10.1021/jz3001213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kumal RR, Landry CR, Abu-Laban M, Hayes DJ, Haber LH. Monitoring the Photocleaving Dynamics of Colloidal MicroRNA-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles Using Second Harmonic Generation. Langmuir. 2015;31:9983–9990. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chase HM, Psciuk BT, Strick BL, Thomson RJ, Batista VS, Geiger FM. Beyond Local Group Modes in Vibrational Sum Frequency Generation. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2015;119:3407–3414. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b02208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu X, Biswas S, Jarrett JW, Poutrina E, Urbas A, Knappenberger KL, Vaia RA, Nealey PF. Deterministic Construction of Plasmonic Heterostructures in Well-Organized Arrays for Nanophotonic Materials. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:7314–7319. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Czaplicki R, Mäkitalo J, Siikanen R, Husu H, Lehtolahti J, Kuittinen M, Kauranen M. Second-Harmonic Generation from Metal Nanoparticles: Resonance Enhancement versus Particle Geometry. Nano Lett. 2015;15:530–534. doi: 10.1021/nl503901e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Capretti A, Pecora EF, Forestiere C, Dal Negro L, Miano G. Size-Dependent Second-Harmonic Generation From Gold Nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2014;89:125414. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dadap JI, Eisenthal KB. Probing the Relative Orientation of Molecules Bound to DNA by Second-Harmonic Generation. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2014;118:14366–14372. doi: 10.1021/jp507834s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kumal RR, Karam TE, Haber LH. Determination of the Surface Charge Density of Colloidal Gold Nanoparticles Using Second Harmonic Generation. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:16200–16207. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Leone SR, Voth GA, Dai H-L. Experimental and Theoretical Probing of Molecular Dynamics at Catalytic and Ionic Liquid Interfaces. DTIC Document. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Daniel J, Bondu F, Adamietz F, Blanchard-Desce M, Rodriguez V. Interfacial Organization in Dipolar Dye-Based Organic Nanoparticles Probed by Second-Harmonic Scattering. ACS Photonics. 2015;2:1209–1216. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Doughty B, Ma Y-Z, Shaw RW. Probing Interfacial Electronic States in CdSe Quantum Dots Using Second Harmonic Generation Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:2752–2760. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Svechkarev D, Kolodezny D, Mosquera-Vázquez S, Vauthey E. Complementary Surface Second Harmonic Generation and Molecular Dynamics Investigation of the Orientation of Organic Dyes at a Liquid/Liquid Interface. Langmuir. 2014;30:13869–13876. doi: 10.1021/la503121g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Karam TE, Haber LH. Molecular Adsorption and Resonance Coupling at the Colloidal Gold Nanoparticle Interface. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014;118:642–649. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Karam TE, Smith HT, Haber LH. Enhanced Photothermal Effects and Excited-State Dynamics of Plasmonic Size-Controlled Gold–Silver–Gold Core–Shell–Shell Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:18573–18580. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Haber LH, Kwok SJJ, Semeraro M, Eisenthal KB. Probing the Colloidal Gold Nanoparticle/Aqueous Interface With Second Harmonic Generation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2011;507:11–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Haber LH, Eisenthal KB. Molecular Excited-State Relaxation Dynamics at the Colloidal Microparticle Interface Monitored with Pump–Probe Second Harmonic Generation. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2013;117:4249–4253. doi: 10.1021/jp304242c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xu B, Gonella G, DeLacy BG, Dai H-L. Adsorption of Anionic Thiols on Silver Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:5454–5461. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gan W, Gonella G, Zhang M, Dai H-L. Communication: Reactions and Adsorption at the Surface of Silver Nanoparticles Probed by Second Harmonic Generation. J. Chem. Phys. 2011;134:041104. doi: 10.1063/1.3548668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shen YR. The Principles of Nonlinear Optics. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Valev V. Characterization of Nanostructured Plasmonic Surfaces With Second Harmonic Generation. Langmuir. 2012;28:15454–15471. doi: 10.1021/la302485c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Smirnova DA, Shadrivov IV, Miroshnichenko AE, Smirnov AI, Kivshar YS. Second-Harmonic Generation by a Graphene Nanoparticle. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2014;90:035412. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Roke S, Gonella G. Nonlinear Light Scattering and Spectroscopy of Particles and Droplets in Liquids. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2012;63:353–378. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yan ECY, Liu Y, Eisenthal KB. New Method for Determination of Surface Potential of Microscopic Particles by Second Harmonic Generation. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102:6331–6336. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Darlington AM, Gibbs-Davis JM. Bimodal or Trimodal? The Influence of Starting pH on Site Identity and Distribution at the Low Salt Aqueous/Silica Interface. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:16560–16567. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Campen RK, Pymer AK, Nihonyanagi S, Borguet E. Linking Surface Potential and Deprotonation in Nanoporous Silica: Second Harmonic Generation and Acid/Base Titration. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010;114:18465–18473. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Schneider L, Peukert W. Second Harmonic Generation Spectroscopy as a Method for in Situ and Online Characterization of Particle Surface Properties. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2006;23:351–359. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Walter SR, Geiger FM. DNA on Stage: Showcasing Oligonucleotides at Surfaces and Interfaces with Second Harmonic and Vibrational Sum Frequency Generation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010;1:9–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li H, Xia H, Wang D, Tao X. Simple Synthesis of Monodisperse, Quasi-Spherical, Citrate-Stabilized Silver Nanocrystals in Water. Langmuir. 2013;29:5074–5079. doi: 10.1021/la400214x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pereira M, Lai EP. Capillary Electrophoresis for the Characterization of Quantum Dots After Non-Selective or Selective Bioconjugation With Antibodies for Immunoassay. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2008;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-6-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Evans DF, Wennerström H. The Colloidal Domain: Where Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Technology Meet. New York: WILEY-VCH; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Doughty B, Kazer SW, Eisenthal KB. Binding and Cleavage of DNA With the Restriction Enzyme EcoR1 Using Time-Resolved Second Harmonic Generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011;108:19979–19984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115498108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Karam TE, Khoury RA, Haber LH. Excited-State Dynamics of Size-Dependent Colloidal TiO2-Au Nanocomposites. J. Chem. Phys. 2016;144:124704. doi: 10.1063/1.4944385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental

RESOURCES