Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2016 Aug 3;98:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.034

Table 1.

Patient and tumor characteristics of the study cohort (n = 9)

Patient
No.
Age
(Years)
Kidney
Anomaly
Sex Symptoms Tumor Location Tumor
Size (cm)
Tumor
R.E.N.A.L.
Score
Tumor Histology Tumor
Stage
Surgical
Margins
1 53 HK Male Hematuria Upper pole   4.8 NA UC TaN0M0 Negative
2 47 HK Female Abdominal mass Renal hilum and adjacent kidney 30 NA Well-differentiated liposarcoma NA Positive
3 52 HK Male Incidental Lower pole   3.6 Unclassified RCC T1aNxM0 Negative
4 58 HK Male Incidental Lower pole abutting isthmus   4.5   10a Clear cell RCC T1bNxM0 Negative
5 75 HK Female Hematuria Upper pole   2 NA UC T2NxM0 Negative
6 75 CFE Male Incidental Lower pole   8.5   10p Papillary type 1 RCC T2aNxM0 Negative
7 41 HK Male Incidental Upper pole   3   NA* Clear cell RCC T1aNxM0 Negative
8 55 HK Male Incidental Lower pole   8   10a Clear cell RCC T2aN0M0 Negative
9 56 CFE Male Incidental Upper pole   6.9 9a Oncocytoma T1bNxM0 Negative

CFE, crossed fused ectopia; HK, horseshoe kidney; NA, not available; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; UC, urothelial carcinoma.

*

Preoperative axial imaging was not available for nephrometry score calculation.