Abstract
Glaucomatous axon injury occurs at the level of the optic nerve head (ONH) in response to uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP). The temporal response of ONH astrocytes (glial cells responsible for axonal support) to elevated IOP remains unknown. Here, we evaluate the response of actin-based astrocyte extensions and integrin-based signaling within the ONH to 8 hours of IOP elevation in a rat model. IOP elevation of 60 mm Hg was achieved under isoflurane anesthesia using anterior chamber cannulation connected to a saline reservoir. ONH astrocytic extension orientation was significantly and regionally rearranged immediately after IOP elevation (inferior ONH, 43.2° ± 13.3° with respect to the anterior-posterior axis versus 84.1° ± 1.3° in controls, p<0.05), and re-orientated back to baseline orientation 1 day post IOP normalization. ONH axonal microtubule filament label intensity was significantly reduced 1 and 3 days post IOP normalization, and returned to control levels on day 5. Phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (FAK) levels steadily decreased after IOP normalization, while levels of phosphorylated paxillin (a downstream target of FAK involved in focal adhesion dynamics) were significantly elevated 5 days post IOP normalization. The levels of phosphorylated cortactin (a downstream target of Src kinase involved in actin polymerization) were significantly elevated 1 and 3 days post IOP normalization and returned to control levels by day 5. No significant axon degeneration was noted by morphologic assessment up to 5 days post IOP normalization. Actin-based astrocyte structure and signaling within the ONH are significantly altered within hours after IOP elevation and prior to axonal cytoskeletal rearrangement, producing some responses that recover rapidly and others that persist for days despite IOP normalization.
Introduction
Glaucoma is a chronic optic neuropathy involving axon degeneration that begins at the level of the optic nerve head (ONH) [1, 2], and is the leading cause of permanent blindness worldwide [3]. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only known modifiable risk factor for glaucoma [4, 5]. The question of what events link elevated IOP to eventual axon injury remains unanswered. Understanding early cellular and molecular responses to elevated IOP within the ONH will be critical to providing insights into possible neuroprotective strategies.
Astrocytes are glial cells that provide structural and physiologic support for ONH axons, and may serve as a link between elevated IOP and eventual axon degeneration [6]. The highly ordered and unique arrangement of ONH astrocyte extensions perpendicular to the axonal axis [7, 8], as well as their intimate contact with the extracellular matrix (ECM) [9], make them prime candidates for sensing and responding to mechanical strain from IOP fluctuations. Astrocytes are positioned along the connective tissues of the ONH, including the laminar beams in the primate ONH [10]. Astrocytes exhibit multiple extensions that enter and unsheathe axon bundles [7, 11, 12]. These astrocyte extensions further couple the meningeal vasculature to axons [13, 14], and are involved in neural development and synapse formation [15], metabolic and ionic support of ONH axons [16–18], facilitate mitochondrial transcellular degradation from retinal ganglion cell axons [19], and phagocytosis of myelin segments within the optic nerve [20, 21]. ONH astrocytes are also mechanosensitive [22–24] and dynamically respond to elevated IOP by retracting or reorienting their extensions [8, 12]. The reaction of ONH astrocytes to elevated IOP may lead to loss of structural and biochemical support of axons and eventual axon degeneration [25–28].
Structural and mechanical astrocytic response to elevated IOP likely involves integrin signaling and actin cytoskeletal dynamics [29, 30]. Integrins are transmembrane receptors that link the extracellular matrix (ECM) environment to the intracellular actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesion dynamics [31]. A large variety of integrin receptor subtypes have been identified within the human and primate ONH and are implicated in glaucomatous optic neuropathy [10]. Integrin receptor activity leads to direct activation of a number of intracellular kinases, including the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and Src kinase family members [32]. Active FAK and Src kinase family members have been shown to be important regulators of cellular responses to injury in cultured astrocytes [33, 34].
The astrocytic actin cytoskeleton is important for astrocyte morphology [35], extension formation [35], migration [36, 37], communication and interaction with the ECM [9], and axonal neuroprotection [38]. In addition, nearly 100 ONH actin cytoskeletal and integrin-related gene expression patterns are altered with early glaucomatous injury in rodent models of glaucoma [39, 40]. Therefore, astrocyte integrin-based signaling and downstream actin cytoskeletal responses may provide a link between elevated IOP, astrocyte reactivity, and eventual axonal injury and degeneration. We hypothesize that actin-based astrocyte extension dynamics within the ONH are a sensitive indicator of astrocyte reactivity to elevated IOP, and that structural changes of astrocyte extensions are downstream of integrin signaling. If so, one would expect modulation in the activity of various downstream mediators of integrin receptors within the ONH upon IOP elevation, including FAK and Src kinases and their downstream targets, paxillin and cortactin, respectively. Here, we determine the astrocytic actin-based structural response, as well as major molecular responses downstream of integrin signaling, within the ONH after 8 hours of IOP elevation in a rat model.
Materials and Methods
All animals were treated in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology statement for the use of animals in ophthalmic and vision research and all experimental methods were approved by the Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All surgeries were performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. Animals were housed and monitored according to OHSU’s Department of Comparative Medicine (DCM) guidelines, which included monitoring animals for illness, injury, or distress by a member of DCM on a daily basis.
Animals and IOP Elevation
Thirty-one male Brown Norway rats (8–9 months old, 350-400g) were housed under alternating 12-hour cycles of light and dark. For IOP elevation, animals were maintained under general anesthesia using 2% isoflurane mixed with 100% oxygen, and kept at a temperature of 37°C using a water bath-controlled blanket. After topical 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution application (Akorn, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA), the anterior chamber of one eye per animal was cannulated using a 31 gauge needle with care to avoid iris or lens trauma. The needle was linked to a reservoir filled with pH-balanced saline solution (BSS Plus, Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) that was raised to produce a pressure of 60 mm Hg, as confirmed by a pressure sensor coupled with the infusion line (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, Massachusetts, USA). Both eyes underwent external IOP measurements every 30 minutes during the period of IOP elevation (8 hours total) using a handheld tonometer (TonoLab; Icare Finland Oy, Espoo, Finland). Both eyes received topical proparacaine and topical BSS, alternating every 15 minutes to keep the ocular surface anesthetized and moist, respectively. Animals received a 1 mL subcutaneous injection of 0.9% saline every hour to maintain systemic hydration while under general anesthesia. After 8 hours of exposure to an IOP of 60 mm Hg, the saline reservoir was lowered to achieve an IOP of 20 for 5 minutes. Following this, the anterior chamber cannula was removed and animals were sacrificed either immediately (day 0), or allowed to survive for 1, 3, or 5 days after IOP normalization (7–8 animals in each of the following survival groups: day 0, 1, 3, and 5). During development of this model, IOP was monitored for up to a week after removal of the intraocular cannula in several additional animals, with no evidence of sustained IOP elevation at any point after the initial IOP elevation (data not shown). To assess axon injury, an additional group of animals underwent unilateral IOP elevation as above (4+ animals in each of the following survival groups: day 0, 1, 3, and 5). Controls included fellow un-injected eyes.
Tissue Preparation, Actin Labeling, and Immuno-labeling, and Primary Antibody Validation
Prior to euthanasia, all animals were anesthetized under deep sedation with isoflurane and sacrificed by transcardial perfusion fixation with freshly prepared buffered 4% formaldehyde solution. In the group of animals used for axon injury assessment, the retrobulbar optic nerves were removed, post-fixed in 5% glutaraldehyde, embedded in plastic, sectioned and stained with toluidine blue (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, Pennsylvania, USA), followed by light microscopy grading of morphologic axonal degeneration on a scale of 1 (no axonal injury) to 5 (axonal degeneration involving the entire nerve area). Section identities were masked and injury was graded by five observers and the grades were averaged as previously described [41, 42].
Perfusion-fixed eyes (including the ONH) were cryopreserved in 15% sucrose/phosphate buffered saline (PBS), followed by 30% sucrose/PBS, positioned for vertical longitudinal sectioning in Optimal Cutting Temperature support medium (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, California, USA), frozen in liquid isopentane cooled by liquid nitrogen, and kept on dry ice until ready for storage in a -80°C freezer. Frozen globes were cryo-sectioned at -20°C (5 μm thickness) onto gelatin-coated microscope slides (LabScientific, Inc., Highlands, New Jersey, USA). Sections closest to the sagittal (vertical midline) plane of the ONH were preferentially used for this study. The superior and inferior orientation of the ONH was determined based on the anatomic location of the central retinal vein and artery, located just inferior to the ONH [43].
Tissue sections were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 1 hour. Tissue sections were co-labeled with primary antibodies in 1% BSA/PBS at 4°C overnight, using antibodies against axonal tubulin (Tuj1; mouse monoclonal against βIII tubulin, 1:500 dilution, Covance, Seattle, Washington, USA), phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (p-FAK; rabbit monoclonal against phosphorylated Tyr 397, 1:500 dilution, Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York, USA), active Src kinase (mouse monoclonal, raised against amino acid residues 519–536 of c-Src, 1:500 dilution, Life Technologies), phosphorylated paxillin (p-paxillin; rabbit polyclonal against phosphorylated Tyr 118, 1:100 dilution, Abcam, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA), phosphorylated cortactin (p-cortactin; rabbit polyclonal against phosphorylated Tyr 421, 1:500 dilution, EMD Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA), or glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, rabbit polyclonal; Dako, Carpentaria, CA, USA). Non-specific mouse or rabbit IgG antibodies (Sigma, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA) were used at similar concentrations to the respective antibodies above for negative control sections. Sections were washed with PBS at room temperature using three 5-minute cycles, followed by incubation with secondary fluorescent-labeled goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit monoclonal antibodies (Alexa 488-labeled, Life Technologies) and actin filament marker tetramethylrhodamine (TRITC)-labeled phalloidin (Sigma) at a concentration of 1 μg/ml in 1% BSA/PBS at room temperature for 1 hour.[8, 44] After washing as above, cell nuclei were stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) contained within the mounting media (Prolong Gold with DAPI, Life Technologies).
In order to validate the primary antibodies used for integrin-based immunofluorescence labeling, we used commercially synthesized blocking peptides (NeoBiolab, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA) to test for the specificity of the primary antibody. The blocking peptides used were the same sequence as the immunogenic peptide used for raising the primary antibody (per the commercial antibody supplier). The blocking peptide sequences were SSETDD[pY]AEII (p-FAK blocking peptide, corresponding to amino acids 390–401 of phosphorylated human FAK), HV[pY]SF (p-paxillin blocking peptide, corresponding to amino acids around the phosphorylation site of tyrosine 118 of human paxillin), LEDYFTSTEPQYQPGENL (active Src blocking peptide, corresponding to amino acid residues 519–536 of human c-Src), and PPSSPI[pY]EDAAPF (p-cortactin blocking peptide, corresponding to residues surrounding phosphorylated tyrosine 421 of mouse cortactin). The blocking peptides were dissolved in PBS at a stock concentration of 1 mg/ml. For primary antibody validation in our immunofluorescence labeling protocol, the primary antibodies (1:500 dilution) were incubated with the specific blocking peptide (1:500 dilution) in 1% BSA/PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. This mixture was then substituted as the primary antibody solution for labeling ONH tissue sections, with no other changes to the immunofluorescent labeling protocol described above.
Microscopy and Image Analysis
Confocal images of the inferior and superior ONH (defined as a 75 x 75 μm area of the ONH just posterior to the termination of Bruch’s membrane, at either the ONH region adjacent to the central retinal vein [inferior] or opposite from the central retinal vein [superior]) were obtained using an FV1000 microscope (Olympus, Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA), an UplanFLN 40x/NA1.30 oil objective, and 3.8x optical zoom. Images were captured using FV10-ASW version 4.0 software (Olympus) with laser wavelength settings of 405nm, 488nm, and 559nm at 1 μm/slice, using the same laser intensity and exposure time for all samples. FIJI image analysis software [45] was used to project a Z-stack of all acquired images per tissue section to visualize the maximum pixel intensity across the sample. The Directionality plugin feature of FIJI [46] was used to determine the mean orientation of actin bundles within the superior and inferior ONH, relative to anterior-posterior (A-P) axis (as defined by the longitudinal axis of axonal tubulin βIII labeling) [8]. To determine label intensity, mean fluorescence pixel intensity within images was calculated using FIJI software. In order to see if the brightest (i.e. most discernible) actin bundles within the ONH were altered after IOP elevation, we measured actin bundle lengths. For actin bundle length measurements, each Z-stack image was segmented into a grid with nine 25 x 25 μm sections, followed by identification of the 5 brightest actin bundles in each grid (a total of approximately 45 actin bundles per image). The identified actin bundles were measured using the ruler tool in the FV10-ASW software. In addition, for the purpose of normalization of actin filament measurements to a known cellular structure, additional length measurements of only actin filament in contact with nuclei were performed using the same grid methodology described above. Measured actin filaments that crossed between the designated grid margins were only counted once.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for 5 independent groups and Dunnett’s multiple comparison testing was used to compare each experimental group to the control group (GraphPad Prism software, La Jolla, California, USA). Linear regression was performed using Prism software to assess for the presence of statistically significant deviation from a zero slope. All analyses were conducted using an alpha level setting of 0.05. Sample sizes (n) reflect the number of eyes used in each of the experimental (day 0, 1, 3, or 5) and control groups.
Results
Optic Nerve Injury After 8 hours of IOP Elevation is Minimal at Five Days Post Exposure
We first determined the level of morphologic optic nerve injury within the posterior, myelinated optic nerve from our model. IOP elevation during the 8 hour exposure was stable and comparable in all experimental groups (Table 1). The IOP of control eyes remained within a physiologic range during 8 hours of anesthesia. No significant morphologic injury was noted in control or experimental myelinated optic nerves, as assessed by light microscopy using a previously validated grading system [41, 42]. The longest surviving group after 8 hours of IOP elevation exhibited minimal morphologic optic nerve axon injury (day 5 injury grade of 1.1 ± 0.1 [n = 4] versus control injury grade of 1.0 ± 0.2 [n = 16]).
Table 1. Mean IOP Measurements During 8 Hours of IOP Elevation.
Group | n | IOPMean ± SD (mm Hg) | Injury Grade (n, p value relative to control) |
---|---|---|---|
Control | 30 | 10.2 ± 1.6 | 1.0 ± 0.1 (16) |
Day 0 | 8 | 58.7 ± 1.3 | 1.0 ± 0.0 (4, >0.05) |
Day 1 | 8 | 58.7 ± 1.8 | 1.0 ± 0.0 (6, >0.05) |
Day 3 | 8 | 57.2 ± 1.5 | 1.0 ± 0.0 (5, >0.05) |
Day 5 | 7 | 57.1 ± 1.5 | 1.1 ± 0.1 (4, <0.01) |
IOP = intraocular pressure (measured with a tonometer); n = number of eyes; SD = standard deviation
ONH Astrocyte Extensions Change Orientation within Hours after IOP Elevation
Given the dynamic nature of astrocytes in vivo [8, 12] and in culture [35–37], we determined the actin-based structural response of the ONH astrocytes to 8 hours of IOP elevation in our rat model, using ONH actin bundles as a highly sensitive marker for astrocyte extensions [8]. We further differentiated the actin-based astrocyte responses of the superior and inferior ONH to elevated IOP, as the superior region of the ONH is more susceptible to axonal injury in models with chronic IOP elevation [6, 47–51], and is more susceptible to mechanical effects in models of acute IOP elevation [52].
Control superior and inferior ONH regions demonstrated highly ordered astrocytic actin bundles (Fig 1A–1C), which were nearly perpendicular to the A-P (axonal) axis of the optic nerve (70.3 ± 10.5° and 84.1° ± 1.3° in the superior and inferior ONH, respectively). There was minimal (if any) actin filament label along the A-P (axonal) axis, indicating limited contribution of actin filament signal from axons with the ONH, consistent with previous findings [8]. Immediately after exposure to 8 hours of IOP elevation (day 0), ONH astrocyte actin bundle orientation shifted to a more oblique and less-organized pattern relative to controls (Fig 1D and 1E). The reorientation of astrocyte actin bundles on day 0 was statistically significant for the inferior ONH relative to controls and to the superior ONH (Fig 2A). The structural organization of astrocyte extensions re-oriented back to baseline orientation within 1 day post IOP normalization in both the superior and inferior ONH, and remained at baseline orientation through day 5 post IOP normalization (Figs 1D, 1E and 2A).
Given the changes we observed in astrocyte bundle orientation with IOP elevation and the previously reported shortening of astrocyte processes in response to elevated IOP [12], we asked if astrocyte actin bundles underwent a change in length within the ONH in response to elevated IOP. Using a grid system to reduce selection bias (Fig 2B), we assessed actin bundle length throughout the superior and inferior ONH. In addition, in order to normalize actin bundle measurements to the cell body, we further assessed the length of only those actin bundles that were in contact with a nucleus. When assessing all actin bundles, control ONHs exhibited mean actin bundle lengths of 7.2 ± 0.3 μm and 7.9 ± 0.7 μm in the superior and inferior ONH, respectively (Fig 2C). In the experimental groups, ONH astrocytes exhibited an increase in mean actin bundle length within 1 day post IOP normalization relative to controls (10.5 ± 0.7 μm and 9.8 ± 0.9 μm in the superior and inferior ONH, respectively), which was also observed up to 5 days post IOP normalization (Fig 2C). This increase in mean actin bundle length in response to elevated IOP was statistically significant within the superior ONH on day 1 and day 5 post IOP normalization, relative to controls. When measuring only actin bundles that were in contact with a nucleus, control ONHs exhibited mean nuclear-adjacent actin bundle lengths of 5.7 ± 0.2 μm and 6.3 ± 0.3 μm in the superior and inferior ONH, respectively (Fig 2D). In the experimental groups, ONH astrocytes exhibited an increase in mean nuclear-adjacent actin bundle length within 1 day post IOP normalization relative to controls (8.4 ± 0.4 μm and 7.5 ± 0.4 μm in the superior and inferior ONH, respectively), which were statistically significant within the superior ONH relative to controls.
Axonal Microtubule Filament Intensity within the ONH is Reversibly Altered after 8 hours of IOP Elevation
While no significant morphologic optic nerve axonal injury was noted in our model 5 days post IOP elevation, we asked if the axonal microtubule architecture within the ONH was altered after IOP elevation, given the intimate relationship between astrocyte extensions and axon bundles [8, 11]. Immediately after IOP elevation, axon-specific βIII tubulin label intensity (indicative of microtubule filaments) remained at levels comparable to controls (Fig 2E). However, 1 day post IOP normalization, the level of ONH axonal microtubule filament intensity was reduced, reaching statistically significant difference within the superior ONH region relative to controls (Fig 2E). This reduction in ONH axonal microtubule filament intensity was sustained 3 days post IOP normalization (reaching statistical significance in both the superior and inferior ONH) and returned to baseline levels within 5 days post IOP normalization (Fig 2E). Of note, this reversible reduction in ONH axonal microtubule filament intensity in response to IOP elevation was temporally preceded by astrocyte actin-based extension re-arrangement, which occurred immediately after IOP elevation (Fig 2A).
IOP Elevation for 8 Hours Alters FAK Activity and Enhances Paxillin Phosphorylation within the ONH
Integrins facilitate mechanosensory cellular responses [53], and their activation [54–56] leads to phosphorylation of FAK (p-FAK; a kinase upstream of actin cytoskeletal remodeling) [57]. Given the significant and rapid actin-based astrocyte structural changes within the ONH in response to elevated IOP in our model, we asked if p-FAK levels were altered in response to elevated IOP. Baseline p-FAK levels were noted in control superior and inferior ONH sections (Fig 3A and 3B). Levels of p-FAK trended toward a reduction immediately post IOP elevation (day 0) and post IOP normalization on days 1–5 (Fig 3A–3C). While p-FAK levels for individual experimental groups post IOP elevation (day 0–5) were not statistically different from control levels, we did note a linear trend toward reduced levels of p-FAK post IOP normalization within the superior and inferior ONH (Fig 3C), which was statistically significant for the superior ONH (as defined by a best fit linear regression compared to a line with a zero slope, R2 = 0.77, p <0.05).
Next, we asked if the level of phosphorylated paxillin (p-paxillin), a downstream target of p-FAK important for focal adhesion and actin cytoskeletal remodeling [58, 59], was altered in response to 8 hours of IOP elevation. Relatively low baseline levels of p-paxillin were noted in control ONHs (Fig 4A and 4B). Immediately after IOP normalization (day 0), p-paxillin levels appeared to be reduced (but did not a reach statistically significant change relative to controls). However, 1 day post IOP normalization, p-paxillin levels increased and reached significantly elevated levels 5 days post IOP normalization relative to controls (Fig 4A–4C).
Src Kinase Target Cortactin is Phosphorylated within the ONH in Response to 8 Hours of IOP Elevation
We next asked if Src kinase, an upstream regulator of actin polymerization [44, 60] and FAK phosphorylation [61], was active within the ONH. Active Src was abundantly found throughout control and experimental ONH sections (Fig 5A and 5B). Active Src levels were slightly reduced immediately after IOP elevation on day 0, reaching statistical significance within the inferior ONH relative to controls (Fig 5C). The level of active Src returned to control levels 1 day post IOP normalization, and remained unchanged 3 and 5 days post IOP normalization relative to controls (Fig 5C).
Given the abundant levels of active Src within the ONH, we asked if cortactin, a downstream target of Src kinase important for actin polymerization [44, 60, 62, 63], was phosphorylated in response to IOP elevation. Levels of phosphorylated cortactin (p-cortactin) were minimal in control ONHs, and remained statistically unchanged immediately after IOP elevation on day 0 (Fig 6A–6C). However, p-cortactin levels significantly increased and peaked 1 day post IOP normalization, and began to trend down 3 days post IOP elevation while remaining significantly elevated relative to controls (Fig 6A–6C). Levels of p-cortactin trended down further to control levels 5 days post IOP normalization (Fig 6A–6C).
Discussion
Here, we present the first evidence of temporal and regional actin-based responses of ONH astrocytes to 8 hours of elevated IOP, which occur within hours of IOP elevation and prior to any significant morphologic evidence of axonal degeneration. In addition, while some of the structural and molecular responses of ONH astrocytes to elevated IOP are largely reversible within days after IOP normalization, we provide evidence of sustained changes in some molecular responses up to 5 days after IOP normalization. Our results also suggest a temporal separation of actin-based astrocyte structural re-orientation prior to tubulin-based axonal cytoskeletal reorganization.
Astrocytes are exquisitely sensitive to external mechanical stimuli [64], likely through sampling and interaction of integrin receptors with the ECM [29]. In culture, astrocytes exposed to external stretch respond by releasing adenosine 5’-triphosphate [22, 65] and endothelin [66]. IOP elevation in vivo induces rapid architectural changes of the ONH and ECM [67]. Given that astrocytes are in intimate contact with the ONH ECM, astrocytic extensions respond to IOP elevation by reorienting and retracting their extensions [8, 12, 68]. Here, we show the first evidence of rapid ONH astrocyte extension rearrangement immediately after 8 hours of IOP elevation, followed by re-orientation back to control levels within 1 day after IOP normalization. In addition, we noted an overall quantitative increase in the average length of actin-based astrocytic extensions 1 day after IOP normalization. The observed reversible changes in astrocyte extension orientation immediately after IOP elevation may imply acute shifts in the biomechanical forces present within the ONH tissue. Indeed, cells rich in actin (such as fibroblasts) are exquisitely sensitive to tissue strain and readily change orientation to counter stretch [69]. In addition, the observed reversible increase in astrocyte actin bundle length 1 day after IOP elevation, may imply that astrocyte response to local ONH mechanical tissue stress involves lengthening of extensions, which is consistent with observed reports of cultured astrocyte processes lengthening under mechanical stress [70].
Interestingly, ONH astrocyte architectural changes in response to short-term IOP elevation (30 mm Hg for 1 hour) in a murine model using glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) as an astrocyte marker [12], suggest astrocytic structural changes and recovery on the time scale of days to weeks after IOP elevation. Our results suggest a more rapid astrocyte rearrangement after IOP elevation, followed by a more rapid reorientation back to baseline levels after IOP normalization (both within hours). This difference may be explained by the level of IOP elevation and the time of exposure achieved in each model, and by the different astrocyte labeling techniques employed in the two models. Here, we use filamentous actin labeling, which is a highly sensitive, real-time indicator of astrocyte extensions [8]. In contrast, GFAP may not be present throughout all astrocyte extensions [71] and GFAP expression patterns have been shown to change with varying levels of tissue stress [72, 73].
The structural and molecular astrocytic changes we observed within the ONH occur prior to any significant morphologic axonal degeneration in the optic nerve. Indeed, other studies have demonstrated that a single short-term exposure to elevated IOP in rodent models does not cause long term effects on axon transport [74, 75]. However, our results indicate a reversible reduction in total axonal microtubule filament intensity within the ONH in response to 8 hours of IOP elevation, potentially due to a reversible depolymerization of microtubule filaments. This reduction in axonal microtubule filament intensity levels is delayed until 1 day post IOP normalization, sustained through 3 days post IOP normalization, and then recovers by 5 days post IOP normalization. This response of axonal microtubule filament rearrangement occurs later than the actin-based astrocyte extension re-arrangement that we observed immediately after IOP elevation. The temporal relationship between these two findings support the possibility that astrocyte architectural re-arrangement in response to IOP elevation may precede axonal injury [8, 76], and may possibly have a causal role in axon degeneration. It is conceivable that repeated or chronic astrocyte architectural changes in response to elevated IOP result in the loss of optimal astrocyte structure and function, which further lead to permanent and irreversible structural changes of axonal microtubule cytoskeleton. Axonal microtubule cytoskeletal disruption would impede axonal transport of cellular cargo and mitochondria [77, 78], and may accelerate eventual axonal degeneration. Indeed, astrocyte morphology alterations have been shown to correlate with axon loss in rodent models of glaucoma [68]. Thus, astrocyte response to elevated IOP within the ONH may be the earliest event in IOP-mediated cellular responses, which result in subsequent chronic changes to astrocyte structure and function that are incompatible with axonal support. This hypothesis remains to be tested in future studies.
Our results indicate a subtle, but significant differential structural rearrangement of actin-based astrocyte extensions within the superior and inferior region of the ONH. In our study, the structural rearrangement of astrocyte extensions in response to elevated IOP are most significant in the inferior ONH immediately after IOP elevation (Fig 2A, day 0). Differential susceptibility to axonal damage between the superior and inferior ONH regions in rodent glaucoma models has been described, and indicates a predilection for superior ONH axon injury [6, 47–51]. The preferential rearrangement of inferior ONH astrocyte extensions in our model may still be consistent with reports of superior ONH susceptibility to axonal injury. As reported by Sun et al [12], rodent astrocyte extensions span the entire transverse diameter of the ONH. As IOP-induced biomechanical strain within the ONH [79] may preferentially be transmitted to astrocytes in the superior ONH, one would expect these astrocytes to be more reactive. Rodent astrocytes cell bodies located within the superior ONH have relatively long, distal extensions spanning to the inferior ONH [12]. These longer, distal extensions are the first to retract and rearrange upon astrocyte reactivity after elevated IOP [12], likely leading to the inferior ONH structural changes observed here. Further investigations into this hypothesis will require detailed finite element modeling of the ONH in response to mechanical strain [80–82], including the contribution of highly ordered actin-based astrocyte extensions to these models.
We hypothesize that the rapid structural changes we observed in ONH astrocyte extension orientation in response to IOP elevation are downstream of integrin signaling (Fig 7). Integrins are cell membrane receptors that interact with the ECM and link extracellular signaling with the intracellular actin cytoskeleton [31]. In addition, integrins are distributed throughout the ONH along the margins of ECM beams and within the glial column [10]. Our results support a rapid intracellular cascade of signaling downstream of integrin receptors involving FAK and Src kinase, and more importantly their respective targets paxillin and cortactin, which have a direct role in actin cytoskeletal remodeling.
First, in control eyes under normal IOP fluctuations, active p-FAK and p-paxillin are present within the ONH. This likely indicates a dynamic and homeostatic interaction between the ECM and the intracellular actin cytoskeleton (through basal integrin activity) to optimize astrocytic extensions in their baseline structural steady state. In this scenario, cortactin remains inactive, potentially through sequestration by the unphosphorylated/inactive portion of the FAK population, which renders cortactin inaccessible for phosphorylation by both FAK and Src kinase [63, 83].
Immediately after 8 hours of IOP elevation (day 0), p-paxillin levels remain unchanged relative to controls. As p-paxillin is necessary for focal contact formation [58], this likely indicates no additional focal contacts formation by astrocyte extensions on day 0 relative to baseline. Un-elevated levels of p-paxillin immediately after IOP elevation may allow for astrocyte extension rearrangement, as observed in this study.
Within 1 day after normalization of IOP, p-paxillin and p-cortactin levels increase within the ONH relative to controls. Phosphorylation of paxillin and cortactin have been shown to enhance focal adhesion formation [32] and actin polymerization [60], respectively, while p-cortactin is necessary for optimal actin dynamics [44]. Taken together, the above changes after IOP normalization may allow for astrocyte extension reformation through enhanced actin polymerization and establishment of new focal contacts. Interestingly, the levels of two of the upstream kinases responsible for p-paxillin and p-cortactin phosphorylation (namely, FAK and Src kinase, respectively), do not significantly increase within the ONH in response to IOP elevation. Indeed, ONH p-FAK levels trend toward lower levels post IOP normalization in our model. This may highlight the importance of other mediators of paxillin and cortactin phosphorylation in response to elevated IOP within the ONH, including the role of other kinases [84–86], phosphatases [87, 88], adaptor proteins [89, 90], and the cellular localization of paxillin and cortactin [91, 92].
Several days after IOP normalization, some of the molecular markers of integrin signaling and actin dynamics have returned to baseline levels within the ONH in our model. However, p-paxillin levels within the ONH continue to remain significantly elevated 5 days post IOP normalization relative to control levels, while ONH p-FAK levels steadily decline post IOP normalization. These results are particularly significant as sustained molecular changes within astrocytes after IOP elevation may play a role in axonal injury in repeat or chronically-sustained IOP elevation models. In such a scenario, repeated IOP elevations may result in additional or synergistic astrocytic structural and molecular changes, which may render astrocytes more reactive to future IOP elevations and therefore less supportive of axons. Indeed, human eyes with greater glaucomatous injury appear to have increased susceptibility to IOP elevation [93], while some patients with glaucomatous injury continue to lose vision despite reduction of their intraocular pressure [94].
In conclusion, 8 hours of IOP elevation in a rat model leads to rapid structural and molecular changes within ONH astrocytes prior to morphologic axon degeneration. These changes are likely mediated through integrin receptors, which act as a link between the ECM and intracellular actin cytoskeleton. While some of the structural and molecular astrocyte changes in response to 8 hours of IOP elevation return to baseline after IOP normalization, evidence of sustained molecular changes within the ONH offers a possible clue into the pathogenesis of axon injury in chronic and repeated IOP elevation, as characterized in primary open angle glaucoma.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Ted Acott (OHSU) for helpful discussion of the results.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
Supported by the American Glaucoma Society Young Clinician Scientist Award (ST), the Glaucoma Research Foundation Shaffer Grant (ST), the Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB) Career Development Award (ST), an unrestricted grant from RPB (CEI/OHSU), and the National Institute of Health (K08EY024025 to ST, R01EY010145 to JCM, P30EY010572 to OHSU). The funders agove had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Kwon YH, Fingert JH, Kuehn MH, Alward WL. Primary open-angle glaucoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(11):1113–24. 10.1056/NEJMra0804630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Burgoyne CF. A biomechanical paradigm for axonal insult within the optic nerve head in aging and glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2010;93(2):120–32. Epub 2010/09/21. 10.1016/j.exer.2010.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–90. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feuer WJ, Parrish RK 2nd, Schiffman JC, Anderson DR, Budenz DL, Wells MC, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: reproducibility of cup/disk ratio measurements over time at an optic disc reading center. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133(1):19–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tamm ER, Fuchshofer R. What increases outflow resistance in primary open-angle glaucoma? Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52 Suppl 2:S101–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dai C, Khaw PT, Yin ZQ, Li D, Raisman G, Li Y. Structural basis of glaucoma: the fortified astrocytes of the optic nerve head are the target of raised intraocular pressure. Glia. 2012;60(1):13–28. Epub 2011/09/29. 10.1002/glia.21242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sun D, Lye-Barthel M, Masland RH, Jakobs TC. The morphology and spatial arrangement of astrocytes in the optic nerve head of the mouse. J Comp Neurol. 2009;516(1):1–19. 10.1002/cne.22058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tehrani S, Johnson EC, Cepurna WO, Morrison JC. Astrocyte processes label for filamentous actin and reorient early within the optic nerve head in a rat glaucoma model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(10):6945–52. 10.1167/iovs.14-14969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Konopka A, Zeug A, Skupien A, Kaza B, Mueller F, Chwedorowicz A, et al. Cleavage of Hyaluronan and CD44 Adhesion Molecule Regulate Astrocyte Morphology via Rac1 Signalling. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155053 10.1371/journal.pone.0155053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Morrison JC. Integrins in the optic nerve head: potential roles in glaucomatous optic neuropathy (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;104:453–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Morrison JC, Cepurna Ying Guo WO, Johnson EC. Pathophysiology of human glaucomatous optic nerve damage: insights from rodent models of glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2011;93(2):156–64. 10.1016/j.exer.2010.08.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sun D, Qu J, Jakobs TC. Reversible reactivity by optic nerve astrocytes. Glia. 2013;61(8):1218–35. 10.1002/glia.22507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Abnet K, Fawcett JW, Dunnett SB. Interactions between meningeal cells and astrocytes in vivo and in vitro. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1991;59(2):187–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Camassa LM, Lunde LK, Hoddevik EH, Stensland M, Boldt HB, De Souza GA, et al. Mechanisms underlying AQP4 accumulation in astrocyte endfeet. Glia. 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sloan SA, Barres BA. Mechanisms of astrocyte development and their contributions to neurodevelopmental disorders. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;27:75–81. 10.1016/j.conb.2014.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Simard M, Nedergaard M. The neurobiology of glia in the context of water and ion homeostasis. Neuroscience. 2004;129(4):877–96. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.09.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pellerin L, Bouzier-Sore AK, Aubert A, Serres S, Merle M, Costalat R, et al. Activity-dependent regulation of energy metabolism by astrocytes: an update. Glia. 2007;55(12):1251–62. 10.1002/glia.20528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Loov C, Hillered L, Ebendal T, Erlandsson A. Engulfing astrocytes protect neurons from contact-induced apoptosis following injury. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33090 10.1371/journal.pone.0033090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Davis CH, Kim KY, Bushong EA, Mills EA, Boassa D, Shih T, et al. Transcellular degradation of axonal mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(26):9633–8. 10.1073/pnas.1404651111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nguyen JV, Soto I, Kim KY, Bushong EA, Oglesby E, Valiente-Soriano FJ, et al. Myelination transition zone astrocytes are constitutively phagocytic and have synuclein dependent reactivity in glaucoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(3):1176–81. Epub 2011/01/05. 10.1073/pnas.1013965108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mills EA, Davis CO, Bushong EA, Boassa D, Kim KY, Ellisman MH, et al. Astrocytes phagocytose focal dystrophies from shortening myelin segments in the optic nerve of Xenopus laevis at metamorphosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Beckel JM, Argall AJ, Lim JC, Xia J, Lu W, Coffey EE, et al. Mechanosensitive release of adenosine 5'-triphosphate through pannexin channels and mechanosensitive upregulation of pannexin channels in optic nerve head astrocytes: A mechanism for purinergic involvement in chronic strain. Glia. 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Choi HJ, Sun D, Jakobs TC. Astrocytes in the optic nerve head express putative mechanosensitive channels. Mol Vis. 2015;21:749–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Levine J, Kwon E, Paez P, Yan W, Czerwieniec G, Loo JA, et al. Traumatically injured astrocytes release a proteomic signature modulated by STAT3-dependent cell survival. Glia. 2016;64(5):668–94. 10.1002/glia.22953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Johnson EC, Deppmeier LM, Wentzien SK, Hsu I, Morrison JC. Chronology of optic nerve head and retinal responses to elevated intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(2):431–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Inman DM, Horner PJ. Reactive nonproliferative gliosis predominates in a chronic mouse model of glaucoma. Glia. 2007;55(9):942–53. 10.1002/glia.20516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Neufeld AH, Liu B. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy: when glia misbehave. Neuroscientist. 2003;9(6):485–95. 10.1177/1073858403253460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ridet JL, Malhotra SK, Privat A, Gage FH. Reactive astrocytes: cellular and molecular cues to biological function. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20(12):570–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gnanaguru G, Bachay G, Biswas S, Pinzon-Duarte G, Hunter DD, Brunken WJ. Laminins containing the beta2 and gamma3 chains regulate astrocyte migration and angiogenesis in the retina. Development. 2013;140(9):2050–60. 10.1242/dev.087817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mierke CT. The role of focal adhesion kinase in the regulation of cellular mechanical properties. Phys Biol. 2013;10(6):065005 10.1088/1478-3975/10/6/065005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Juliano RL, Reddig P, Alahari S, Edin M, Howe A, Aplin A. Integrin regulation of cell signalling and motility. Biochem Soc Trans. 2004;32(Pt3):443–6. 10.1042/BST0320443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Webb DJ, Donais K, Whitmore LA, Thomas SM, Turner CE, Parsons JT, et al. FAK-Src signalling through paxillin, ERK and MLCK regulates adhesion disassembly. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6(2):154–61. 10.1038/ncb1094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Giralt A, Coura R, Girault JA. Pyk2 is essential for astrocytes mobility following brain lesion. Glia. 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jo A, Park H, Lee SH, Ahn SH, Kim HJ, Park EM, et al. SHP-2 binds to caveolin-1 and regulates Src activity via competitive inhibition of CSK in response to H2O2 in astrocytes. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91582 10.1371/journal.pone.0091582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ho KW, Lambert WS, Calkins DJ. Activation of the TRPV1 cation channel contributes to stress-induced astrocyte migration. Glia. 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Murk K, Blanco Suarez EM, Cockbill LM, Banks P, Hanley JG. The antagonistic modulation of Arp2/3 activity by N-WASP, WAVE2 and PICK1 defines dynamic changes in astrocyte morphology. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(Pt 17):3873–83. 10.1242/jcs.125146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Feng J, Hu Z, Chen H, Huan J, Wu R, Dong Z, et al. Depletion of kinesin-12, a myosin-IIB interacting protein, promotes migration of cortical astrocytes. J Cell Sci. 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Posada-Duque RA, Palacio-Castaneda V, Cardona-Gomez GP. CDK5 knockdown in Astrocytes provide neuroprotection as a trophic source via Rac1. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Howell GR, Macalinao DG, Sousa GL, Walden M, Soto I, Kneeland SC, et al. Molecular clustering identifies complement and endothelin induction as early events in a mouse model of glaucoma. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(4):1429–44. Epub 2011/03/09. 10.1172/JCI44646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Johnson EC, Doser TA, Cepurna WO, Dyck JA, Jia L, Guo Y, et al. Cell proliferation and interleukin-6-type cytokine signaling are implicated by gene expression responses in early optic nerve head injury in rat glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(1):504–18. Epub 2010/09/18. 10.1167/iovs.10-5317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jia L, Cepurna WO, Johnson EC, Morrison JC. Patterns of intraocular pressure elevation after aqueous humor outflow obstruction in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(6):1380–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Morrison JC, Johnson EC, Cepurna W, Jia L. Understanding mechanisms of pressure-induced optic nerve damage. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24(2):217–40. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pazos M, Yang H, Gardiner SK, Cepurna WO, Johnson EC, Morrison JC, et al. Rat optic nerve head anatomy within 3D histomorphometric reconstructions of normal control eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2015;139:1–12. 10.1016/j.exer.2015.05.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tehrani S, Faccio R, Chandrasekar I, Ross FP, Cooper JA. Cortactin has an essential and specific role in osteoclast actin assembly. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17(7):2882–95. 10.1091/mbc.E06-03-0187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Woolley AJ, Desai HA, Steckbeck MA, Patel NK, Otto KJ. In situ characterization of the brain-microdevice interface using device-capture histology. J Neurosci Methods. 2011;201(1):67–77. Epub 2011 Jul 23. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.07.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Morrison JC, Cepurna WO, Jia L, Aubert J, Johnson EC. Mechanism of Focal Optic Nerve Injury from Elevated Intraocular Pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(12):2885-. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Morrison JC, Moore CG, Deppmeier LM, Gold BG, Meshul CK, Johnson EC. A rat model of chronic pressure-induced optic nerve damage. Exp Eye Res. 1997;64(1):85–96. 10.1006/exer.1996.0184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Huang XR, Knighton RW. Altered F-actin distribution in retinal nerve fiber layer of a rat model of glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88(6):1107–14. Epub 2009/05/20. 10.1016/j.exer.2009.01.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kwong JM, Vo N, Quan A, Nam M, Kyung H, Yu F, et al. The dark phase intraocular pressure elevation and retinal ganglion cell degeneration in a rat model of experimental glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2013;112:21–8. 10.1016/j.exer.2013.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.WoldeMussie E, Ruiz G, Wijono M, Wheeler LA. Neuroprotection of retinal ganglion cells by brimonidine in rats with laser-induced chronic ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(12):2849–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fortune B, Choe TE, Reynaud J, Hardin C, Cull GA, Burgoyne CF, et al. Deformation of the rodent optic nerve head and peripapillary structures during acute intraocular pressure elevation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(9):6651–61. 10.1167/iovs.11-7578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Thi MM, Suadicani SO, Schaffler MB, Weinbaum S, Spray DC. Mechanosensory responses of osteocytes to physiological forces occur along processes and not cell body and require alphaVbeta3 integrin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(52):21012–7. 10.1073/pnas.1321210110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Milner R, Crocker SJ, Hung S, Wang X, Frausto RF, del Zoppo GJ. Fibronectin- and vitronectin-induced microglial activation and matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression is mediated by integrins alpha5beta1 and alphavbeta5. J Immunol. 2007;178(12):8158–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nasu-Tada K, Koizumi S, Inoue K. Involvement of beta1 integrin in microglial chemotaxis and proliferation on fibronectin: different regulations by ADP through PKA. Glia. 2005;52(2):98–107. 10.1002/glia.20224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cambier S, Gline S, Mu D, Collins R, Araya J, Dolganov G, et al. Integrin alpha(v)beta8-mediated activation of transforming growth factor-beta by perivascular astrocytes: an angiogenic control switch. Am J Pathol. 2005;166(6):1883–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tomar A, Schlaepfer DD. Focal adhesion kinase: switching between GAPs and GEFs in the regulation of cell motility. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21(5):676–83. 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Smith MA, Blankman E, Deakin NO, Hoffman LM, Jensen CC, Turner CE, et al. LIM domains target actin regulators paxillin and zyxin to sites of stress fiber strain. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e69378 10.1371/journal.pone.0069378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fang X, Liu X, Yao L, Chen C, Lin J, Ni P, et al. New insights into FAK phosphorylation based on a FAT domain-defective mutation. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107134 10.1371/journal.pone.0107134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tehrani S, Tomasevic N, Weed S, Sakowicz R, Cooper JA. Src phosphorylation of cortactin enhances actin assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(29):11933–8. 10.1073/pnas.0701077104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wang JT, Song LZ, Li LL, Zhang W, Chai XJ, An L, et al. Src controls neuronal migration by regulating the activity of FAK and cofilin. Neuroscience. 2015;292:90–100. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.02.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Cao H, Chen J, Krueger EW, McNiven MA. SRC-mediated phosphorylation of dynamin and cortactin regulates the "constitutive" endocytosis of transferrin. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30(3):781–92. 10.1128/MCB.00330-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang W, Liu Y, Liao K. Tyrosine phosphorylation of cortactin by the FAK-Src complex at focal adhesions regulates cell motility. BMC Cell Biol. 2011;12:49 10.1186/1471-2121-12-49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Johnson E, Jia L, Cepurna W, Morrison J. Microarray analysis implicates a mechanical stretch response contribution to pressure-induced optic nerve head (ONH) injury. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;ARVO Abstract:1827. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Neary JT, Kang Y, Willoughby KA, Ellis EF. Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase by stretch-induced injury in astrocytes involves extracellular ATP and P2 purinergic receptors. J Neurosci. 2003;23(6):2348–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ostrow LW, Sachs F. Mechanosensation and endothelin in astrocytes—hypothetical roles in CNS pathophysiology. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005;48(3):488–508. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yang H, Downs JC, Sigal IA, Roberts MD, Thompson H, Burgoyne CF. Deformation of the Normal Monkey Optic Nerve Head Connective Tissue Following Acute IOP Elevation Within 3-D Histomorphometric Reconstructions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009. Epub 2009/07/25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lye-Barthel M, Sun D, Jakobs TC. Morphology of astrocytes in a glaucomatous optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(2):909–17. 10.1167/iovs.12-10109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Neidlinger-Wilke C, Grood ES, Wang J-C, Brand RA, Claes L. Cell alignment is induced by cyclic changes in cell length: studies of cells grown in cyclically stretched substrates. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(2):286–93. 10.1016/S0736-0266(00)00029-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Katiyar KS, Winter CC, Struzyna LA, Harris JP, Cullen DK. Mechanical elongation of astrocyte processes to create living scaffolds for nervous system regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Koke JR, Mosier AL, Garcia DM. Intermediate filaments of zebrafish retinal and optic nerve astrocytes and Muller glia: differential distribution of cytokeratin and GFAP. BMC research notes. 2010;3:50 10.1186/1756-0500-3-50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chen H, Weber AJ. Expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and glutamine synthetase by Muller cells after optic nerve damage and intravitreal application of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Glia. 2002;38(2):115–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Gallego BI, Salazar JJ, de Hoz R, Rojas B, Ramirez AI, Salinas-Navarro M, et al. IOP induces upregulation of GFAP and MHC-II and microglia reactivity in mice retina contralateral to experimental glaucoma. Journal of neuroinflammation. 2012;9:92 10.1186/1742-2094-9-92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Fahy ET, Chrysostomou V, Abbott CJ, van Wijngaarden P, Crowston JG. Axonal transport along retinal ganglion cells is grossly intact during reduced function post-injury. Exp Eye Res. 2016;146:289–92. 10.1016/j.exer.2016.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Abbott CJ, Choe TE, Lusardi TA, Burgoyne CF, Wang L, Fortune B. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and axonal transport 1 and 2 weeks after 8 hours of acute intraocular pressure elevation in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(2):674–87. 10.1167/iovs.13-12811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Son JL, Soto I, Oglesby E, Lopez-Roca T, Pease ME, Quigley HA, et al. Glaucomatous optic nerve injury involves early astrocyte reactivity and late oligodendrocyte loss. Glia. 2010;58(7):780–9. 10.1002/glia.20962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Morris RL, Hollenbeck PJ. Axonal transport of mitochondria along microtubules and F-actin in living vertebrate neurons. J Cell Biol. 1995;131(5):1315–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Saxton WM, Hollenbeck PJ. The axonal transport of mitochondria. J Cell Sci. 2012;125(Pt 9):2095–104. 10.1242/jcs.053850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I, Ethier CR. Predicted extension, compression and shearing of optic nerve head tissues. Exp Eye Res. 2007;85(3):312–22. 10.1016/j.exer.2007.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sigal IA, Ethier CR. Biomechanics of the optic nerve head. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88(4):799–807. 10.1016/j.exer.2009.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Nguyen TD, Ethier CR. Biomechanical assessment in models of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Exp Eye Res. 2015;141:125–38. 10.1016/j.exer.2015.05.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Feola AJ, Myers JG, Raykin J, Mulugeta L, Nelson ES, Samuels BC, et al. Finite Element Modeling of Factors Influencing Optic Nerve Head Deformation Due to Intracranial Pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(4):1901–11. 10.1167/iovs.15-17573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tomar A, Lawson C, Ghassemian M, Schlaepfer DD. Cortactin as a target for FAK in the regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44041 10.1371/journal.pone.0044041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Romanova LY, Mushinski JF. Central role of paxillin phosphorylation in regulation of LFA-1 integrins activity and lymphocyte migration. Cell Adh Migr. 2011;5(6):457–62. 10.4161/cam.5.6.18219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sangrar W, Gao Y, Scott M, Truesdell P, Greer PA. Fer-mediated cortactin phosphorylation is associated with efficient fibroblast migration and is dependent on reactive oxygen species generation during integrin-mediated cell adhesion. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(17):6140–52. 10.1128/MCB.01744-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Maruyama S, Kurosaki T, Sada K, Yamanashi Y, Yamamoto T, Yamamura H. Physical and functional association of cortactin with Syk in human leukemic cell line K562. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(12):6631–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zhao Y, Zhang X, Guda K, Lawrence E, Sun Q, Watanabe T, et al. Identification and functional characterization of paxillin as a target of protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor T. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(6):2592–7. 10.1073/pnas.0914884107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.St-Pierre J, Ostergaard HL. A role for the protein tyrosine phosphatase CD45 in macrophage adhesion through the regulation of paxillin degradation. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e71531 10.1371/journal.pone.0071531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Fujikawa A, Matsumoto M, Kuboyama K, Suzuki R, Noda M. Specific dephosphorylation at tyr-554 of git1 by ptprz promotes its association with paxillin and hic-5. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119361 10.1371/journal.pone.0119361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Oser M, Mader CC, Gil-Henn H, Magalhaes M, Bravo-Cordero JJ, Koleske AJ, et al. Specific tyrosine phosphorylation sites on cortactin regulate Nck1-dependent actin polymerization in invadopodia. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 21):3662–73. 10.1242/jcs.068163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Ito A, Shimazu T, Maeda S, Shah AA, Tsunoda T, Iemura S, et al. The subcellular localization and activity of cortactin is regulated by acetylation and interaction with Keap1. Science signaling. 2015;8(404):ra120 10.1126/scisignal.aad0667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Dong JM, Lau LS, Ng YW, Lim L, Manser E. Paxillin nuclear-cytoplasmic localization is regulated by phosphorylation of the LD4 motif: evidence that nuclear paxillin promotes cell proliferation. Biochem J. 2009;418(1):173–84. 10.1042/BJ20080170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Grant WM, Burke JF Jr. Why do some people go blind from glaucoma? Ophthalmology. 1982;89(9):991–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Brubaker RF. Delayed functional loss in glaucoma. LII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121(5):473–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.