Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 15;41(2):568–577. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.184

Table 1. Summary of Details from RM ANOVAs on List-DMS Performance.

  % Correct, dose–response function
 
  Difficulty Treatment Interaction Response latency % Task completion
Ketamine F2,16=42.3; p<0.0001 F4,32=12.4; p<0.0001 F8,64=1.4; p>0.05 F4,32=5.9; p=0.001 F4,32=6.2; p=0.0008
AZD6765 F2,14=35.9; p<0.0001 F3,21=12.4; p<0.0001 F6,42=12.5; p<0.0001 F3,21=0.2; p>0.05 F3,21=4.9; p=0.01
CP101,606 F2,16=219.3; p<0.0001 F5,40=32.6; p<0.0001 F10,80=5.1; p<0.0001 F5,40=2.1; p=0.09 F5,40=3.2; p=0.02
BMT-108908 F2,16=211.6; p<0.0001 F4,32=39.5; p<0.0001 F8.64=12.8; p<0.0001 F4,32=4.4; p=0.006 F4,32=0.9; p>0.05

% correct after 30 min PT data were analyzed with a two-way RM ANOVA. Response latency, % task completion, and pretreatment time were analyzed with one-way RM ANOVAs.