Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2016 Nov 30;11(11):e0166368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166368

Antimicrobial Potential, Identification and Phylogenetic Affiliation of Wild Mushrooms from Two Sub-Tropical Semi-Evergreen Indian Forest Ecosystems

Lallawmsanga 1, Ajit Kumar Passari 1, Vineet Kumar Mishra 1, Vincent Vineeth Leo 1, Bhim Pratap Singh 1,*, Geetha Valliammai Meyyappan 3, Vijai Kumar Gupta 2, Sivakumar Uthandi 3, Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay 4
Editor: PC Abhilash5
PMCID: PMC5130189  PMID: 27902725

Abstract

The diversity of wild mushrooms was investigated from two protected forest areas in India and 231 mushroom specimens were morphologically identified. Among them, 76 isolates were screened for their antimicrobial potential against seven bacterial and fungal pathogens. Out of 76 isolates, 45 isolates which displayed significant antimicrobial activities were identified using ITS rRNA gene amplification and subsequently phylogenetically characterized using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Sequencing of the ITS rRNA region classified the isolates into 16 genera belonging to 11 families. In total, 11 RAPD and 10 ISSR primers were selected to evaluate genetic diversity based on their banding profile produced. In total 337 RAPD and 312 ISSR bands were detected, among which percentage of polymorphism ranges from 34.2% to 78.8% and 38.6% to 92.4% by using RAPD and ISSR primers respectively. Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) trees of selected two methods were structured similarly, grouping the 46 isolates into two clusters which clearly showed a significant genetic distance among the different strains of wild mushroom, with an similarity coefficient ranges from 0.58 to 1.00 and 0.59 to 1.00 with RAPD and ISSR analysis respectively. This reporthas highlighted both DTR and MNP forests provide a habitat for diverse macrofungal species, therefore having the potential to be used for the discovery of antimicrobials. The report has also demonstrated that both RAPD and ISSR could efficiently differentiate wild mushrooms and could thus be considered as efficient markers for surveying genetic diversity. Additionally, selected six wild edible mushroom strains (Schizophyllum commune BPSM01, Panusgiganteus BPSM27, Pleurotussp. BPSM34, Lentinussp. BPSM37, Pleurotusdjamor BPSM41 and Lentinula sp. BPSM45) were analysed for their nutritional (proteins, carbohydrates, fat and ash content), antioxidant potential. The present findings also suggested that the wild edible mushroom strains do not have only nutritional values but also can be used as an accessible source of natural antioxidants.

Introduction

Mushrooms are fleshy fungi and have become attractive as a source for the development of several extracellular enzymes with agricultural and biotechnological significance. Worldwide, they are well recognized as supplementary food due to their high nutritional values [1, 2] and medicinal importance, which includes their antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [3, 4], immune enhancer [57], and to be effective for the treatment of diabetic [8, 9] and few types of cancers as well [10,11].

Even today, most of the tribal people in rural areas use wild mushrooms as their mainstay which sometimes leads to fatality due to the lack of knowledge in differentiating between edible and non-edible/poisonous mushrooms [12]. Moreover, their ecological influence also varies from one to another depends on their lifestyle [13]. In this context, there is a need to scientifically characterize and document the wild fruiting bodies, especially from the tribal regions and also to explore their potential for sustainable development.

Currently, amplification of the Internal Transcribed Spacers region of ribosomal DNA (ITS rDNA) has been proven as a powerful tool for the identification and phylogenetic analysis of mushrooms [1418]. In this study, we selected two DNA based markers like randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR) to understand the genetic diversity among the wild mushrooms as these marker systems have been routinely employed to assess genetic diversity [19,20].

Northeastern India is well known for its rich biodiversity and for its un-tapped bioresources which fallsunder Indo-Burma Mega biodiversity Hot Spot [21]. Though, few studies have been carried out in respect to the nutritional values and industrial applications of wild and edible mushrooms fromNortheast India [2224]. However, there are no published reports on the collection and application of wild mushrooms from protected forest areas of Mizoram, Northeast, India. Moreover, urbanization, population growth, deforestation and shifting cultivation have led to loss of biodiversity in the state [25]. At the same time, wild mushroom collection based on their traditional knowledge is an alternative source of their income in the region studied. The tribes of this region collect the wild naturally growing mushrooms, commonly known as “Pa” and sold them at local market for the betterment of their family. Hence, the present work was focused on the collection of wild fruiting bodies from two protected forest areas of Mizoram, Northeast India and was morphologically and molecularly identified by the amplification of the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Mycelial cultures were raised and screened for their antimicrobial activities. Furthermore, the identified mushrooms were genetically characterized by using RAPD and ISSR molecular markers. All the collected specimens were deposited in the Directorate of Mushroom Research, Solan, India. We hypothesized that the present study in general will help the local mushroom hunters to differentiate between edible and poisonous fruiting bodies. Overall the selected potential isolates can be exploited for the development of effective antimicrobials.

Materials and Methods

Study areas

The following protected forest areas were investigated inthe present study:

  1. Dampa Tiger Reserve (DTR) (23° 23'N—23° 42’N; 92° 16'E—92° 25'E), which is one of the largest wildlife sanctuaries in Mizoram. It covers an area of ≈ 500 km2 (Fig 1) and the altitude of the reserve is from 800 to 1100 m above sea level with annual rainfall during the years of sampling ranges from 2000 mm to 2500. Maximum rainfall was observed mostly during June to August every year. The winter (October–January) is a cool dry season with few rainy days. Summer (February to May) is largely hot and dry, with occasional thundershowers and pre-monsoon rains in April-May.It has fine loam type of soil which covers over 48% of the total area of the state. The soil pH is ≈5.34 and is rich in Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K). Temperature ranges from 12°C to 25°C during winter and between 22°C to 35°C during summer. DTR is recognised as sub-tropical semi-evergreen.

  2. Murlen Nation Park (MNP) (23° 32'—23° 41'N; 92°13'—92°27'E) is located close to China Hills and covers an area of ≈ 100 km2 (Fig 1). Altitude ranges from 1,000–1,600 m and the average annual rainfall is about 2500 mm. MNP is classified as sub-tropical semi-evergreen and sub-montane forest. Winter is usually from October to mid-February and summer is from February/March to May. The pH of the soil is ≈5.92 and the soil type is mostly clayey fine soils which are usually deep and well drained.The temperature during winter ranges from 4°C to 20°C and 22°C to 32°C during summer.

Fig 1. Map revealed the locations of the Sub-tropical Semi-evergreen forest ecosystems sampling sites of Dampa TR and Murlen NP, Mizoram, India.

Fig 1

Collection of wild mushrooms

Selected forests were visited for three consecutive years (2013–15) during rainy and winter sessions (June to December). Permission to collect wild mushrooms from the protected forests was obtained from the Chief Wildlife Warden, Environment and Forest Department, Government of Mizoram, India issued by Mr. LiankimaLailung, Conservator of Forest (WL), Mizoram, India. The wild mushrooms were identified in situ if possible or else the specimens were retained for later identification. The samples were collected in sterile paper bags and brought into the laboratory. Morphological parameters (pileus, lamellae, stipe, spore print and color) were assessed from fresh samples as per Largent and Stuntz [26]. Digital pictures were taken at natural habitat as well as under laboratory conditions and characterized morphologically up to genus level.

Tissue culture of wild mushrooms

The collected fruiting bodies were used to raise mycelial culture as per the modified method of Bolla et al. [27]. Briefly, the collected fruiting bodies were cleaned thoroughly by using fabric paint brush. A small piece of tissue from the fruiting body was dipped in 0.05% sodium hypochloride (NaOCl) solution and washed three times with sterile distilled water. The samples were dried on sterilized tissue paper and transferred aseptically on to potato dextrose agar (Hi-Media, Cat No: MH096) media and incubated at 28°C for 5–7 days.

Test organisms for antimicrobial activities

Antimicrobial activities were tested using three bacterial pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus: MTCC-96; Escheridia coli: MTCC-739; Pseudomonas aeruginosa: MTCC-2453), three fungal pathogens (Fusarium oxysporum: MTCC-2946; Fusarium proliferatum: MTCC-286; Fusarium oxy f. sp. ciceri: MTCC-2791) and a yeast pathogen (Candida albicans: MTCC-3017). All the tested pathogens were obtained from the Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), Chandigarh, India and were maintained at Molecular Microbiology and Systematics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Mizoram University on specific media as per instructions.

Evaluation for antifungal potential

All the isolates were screened for their in vitro antagonistic activity by dual culture technique [28, 29]. Briefly, one 5 mm agar block of fully grown fungal pathogen was placed at the centre of the petridish containing PDA, and mushroom isolates were kept at the periphery of the plates. Petri dishes were incubated at 28°C for 7 days and diameter of the fungus growth was measured as compared to control. All the experiments were carried out in triplicate and the percentage of inhibition was calculated using the formula: C-T/C×100; Where, C is the fungal pathogen control and T is the distance of the tested pathogen with the sample.

Evaluation for antibacterial potential

Antibacterial activity was determined by modified agar well diffusion method [30]. Briefly, an aliquot of the tested bacterial pathogens (50 μl) were spread on the surface of the modified LB agar plates using sterile L spreader and well of 6 mm diameter was prepared by using sterile cork borer. The wells were filled with 100 μl (1×10−4 CFU/ml) of cell free extractof mushroom isolate and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. All experiments were carried out in triplicates and the zone of inhibition was measured in mm.

Molecular characterization of Mushrooms

DNA extraction and ITS-rRNA gene amplification

Total genomic DNA was extracted from the freshly grown mycelial mat as described by Cenis [31] with minor modification. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rDNA was amplified using universal primers ITS1 (5’-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3’) and ITS4 (5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’) [32]. PCR reaction mixture was carried out in a total volume of 25 μL containing, 1X PCR assay buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2, 2.5mm dNTPs, 10 pmols of each primer, 50 ng of template DNA and 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase. The PCR was carried out in the Applied Biosystems thermal cycler with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 57°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 2 min and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The amplified PCR product was separated on 1.5% agarose gel and visualized under Bio-Rad Gel Documentation System XR+ (Hercules, CA, USA). The products were purified by using the Pure-link PCR Purification Kit (In-vitrogen) and sequenced commercially at Sci-Genom Labs Pvt. Ltd, Cochin, India.

Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Inter Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) analysis

For RAPD profiling, eleven random decamer primers (Imperial Life Sciences (P) Ltd, (Table 1) were used to produce fingerprinting profiles. The reactions were assembled in a Veriti Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Singapore) in a total volume of 50 μl containing 5.0 μl of 10X reaction buffer, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mMdNTPs, 5 pmols of each primer, 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase and 50 ng template DNA. Negative control reaction without DNA was included in each set. The PCR amplification was carried out with the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 35s, annealing at 32°C for 45 s, extension at 72°C for 2 min and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The amplified PCR product was separated on 1.5% agarose gel using TAE buffer and examined under gel documentation system as described earlier. Ten ISSR primers were selected (Table 1) and amplification was done as per Du et al. [33].

Table 1. RAPD and ISSR primers and corresponding annealing temperatures used.
Marker Primer Code Primer Sequences (5’-3’) Annealing temperature (°C)
RAPD R1 ggacttacag 32.0
R2 ctgactcatg 34.0
R3 cttcattgcc 36.0
R4 tgccgagctg 30.0
R5 aatcgggctg 32.0
R6 gaaacgggtg 32.0
R7 gtgacgtagg 34.0
R8 agccagcgaa 36.0
R9 caaacgtcgg 36.0
R10 gtcgccgtca 34.0
R11 ccgcatctac 34.0
ISSR P1 tg(ca)6c 50.0
P2 gt(ca)6c 50.0
P3 gtgacga(ct)6 52.0
P10 (ga)8c 54.0
P11 (ag)8c 52.0
P12 (ga)8c 52.0
P13 (ca)8g 54.0
P14 (tc)8c 54.0
P15 (ac)8c 54.0
P16 (ag)8g 50.0

The PCR reaction mixture was performed in 25 μl total volume, containing 50 ng of genomic DNA, 2.5 μl of 10X Taq Buffer with 15mM MgCl2, 2.0 μl of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μl of 10 pmol ISSR primer,1 μl of DMSO (100%), 0.5 μl of BSA (10 mg/ml) and 2U Taq DNA Polymerase.The amplification conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 50 s, at 45°C for 50 s, and at 72°C for 2 min with a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. The amplified fragments were separated on 1.2% agarose gel using 1X TAE buffer and the banding patterns were examined under gel documentation system asmentioned above.

Phylogenetic analysis

The obtained ITS sequences were compared with type strains retrieved from GenBank/NCBI database using BlastN search program and were aligned using Clustal W [34]. Evolutionary models were selected according to BIC scores (Bayesian Information Criterion) and AICc values (Akaike Information Criterion, corrected) [35] using Mega 5.05 version [34]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by neighbor-joining method using the model Kimura 3-parameter K2 + I (I = 0.67, R = 1.67) [36] taking Solanumkurzii(KC535794) as an out group. The robustness of the phylogenetic tree was tested by bootstrap analysis using 1,000 replicates using p-distance model [37]. Trees were viewed and edited by using program FigTree 1.3.1.

Amplified fragments of RAPD and ISSR were scored as present (1), or absent (0), the fragments produced were numbered sequentially and entered into a binomial matrix [38]. Only fragments bigger than 100 bases were considered for analysis. The binary matrix was used to calculate the Simple Matching (SM) coefficient, and a cluster analysis was performed using Unweighted Pair Group with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) algorithm supported by Numerical Taxonomy SYStem (NTSYS version 2.2).

Determination of Nutritional values of selected wild edible mushrooms

Ash content

Samples (1 g each) were dried for overnight in the oven maintained at 105°C and weighed, then placed at 575°C for 5 h. Then, the samples were weighed for final mass and difference between the mass at 105°C and 575°C was taken as ash content [39].

Carbohydrate content

Carbohydrate content was estimated by phenol sulphuric acid method with glucose as standard [40].

Protein content

Protein content was estimated by Bradford method using BSA as standard [41].

Fat content

The fat was extracted by Chloroform-methanol extraction and estimation method [42].

Determination of antioxidant potential of selected wild edible mushrooms

Extract preparation

The lyophilized powder (1.5 g) was extracted by stirring with 40 mL of methanol (25°C at 150 rpm) for 2 h and subsequently filtered through Whatman No. 4 paper. The residue was then extracted with 20 mL of methanol (25°C at 150 rpm) for 2 h. The combined methanolic extracts were evaporated at 40°C (rotary evaporator BUCHI R-210, Switzerland) to dryness and stored at 4°C until analysis [43].

Determination of total phenolic content (TPC)

Total phenolic content was measured according to the method given by Singleton et al. [44]. Briefly, 0.5 mL of sample was added to 4.5 mL of distilled water and was mixed with 0.2 mL saturated solution of Na2CO3; finally 4.3 mL of distilled water was added to the solution. The reaction mixture was incubated for 60 min in the dark at room temperature and then the absorbance was measured at 725 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer UV-vis (Multiscan GO, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). Total phenolic content was expressed as mg of Gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per gram of dry sample (mg GAE/g). The measurements were done in triplicate.

Determination of total flavonoids content (TFC)

The flavonoids content was determined by the calorimetric method of aluminium chloride according to methodology previously described by Chang et al [45]. In this, 0.5 mL was mixed with 1.5 mL of 95% ethanol, 0.1 mL of 10% aluminium chloride, 0.1 mL of 1M potassium acetate and 2.8 mL of distilled water. Finally, absorbance was measure at 415 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer UV-vis (Multiscan GO, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) after incubation for 30 min in darkness at room temperature. The flavonoid content was calculated in mg Quercetin equivalents per g of dried sample (mg QAE/g).

Scavenging Activity of ABTS Radical

ABTS radical scavenging activity was determined according to Re et al [46] with some modifications. 2, 2-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) was dis- solved in water to a 7 mM concentration. ABTS radical cation (ABTSO+) was produced by reacting ABTS stock solution with 2.45 mM potassium persulfate (final concentration) and allowing the mixture to stand in the dark at room temperature for 12–16 h before use. The ABTSO+solution was diluted with water to an absorbance of 0.70 (±0.02) at 734 nm. The reaction mixture consisted of 0.07 mL of extract and 3 mL of the ABTS radical. After incubation for 6 min, absorbance was determined in spectrophotometer at 734 nm. The antioxidant activity was calculated by using the following equation.

% inhibition=[Acontrol AsampleAcontrol]×100

Acontrol = Absorbance of negative control at the moment of solution preparation

Asample = Absorbance of sample after 45 min

The IC50 values were calculated as the concentration of the sample (mg) required to scavenge 50% of the ABTS free radical. The IC50 is often used to express the amount of concentration of extracts need to scavenge 50%of the free radicals.

Fourier Transform infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis of selected wild edible mushrooms

The selected wild mushroom samples were dried and mixed with FT-IR grade potassium bromide (1:20; 0.02 of sample with KBr at a final weight of 0.4 g). The samples were grounded in agate pestle and mortar for obtaining pellets by hydraulic press. The absorbance Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the samples were recorded using JASCO FT-IR 6800 within the scanning range of 400–4000 cm-1 and 64 scans per second were recorded [47].

Data analysis

The data were calculated in mean ± SD of the values found in triplicates from antimicrobial screening and analysed by one way of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare statistical significant differences (P<0.05) between antimicrobial activities of all isolates using Duncan’s multiple range test of SPSS software version 6.0. All the experiments were done in triplicates and the mean was taken. Relative abundance of mushroom isolates was compared between the selected natural forests by using Sigma Plot 12.0 version. Venn diagram was prepared online by using Bioinformatics and evolutionary genomics site (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

All the ITS rRNA gene sequences were deposited in NCBI-GenBank with accession numbers (KJ865831- KJ865841, KJ865843, KM985651, KM985653- KM985664, and KM985666- KM985685).

Results

Assessing Mushroom diversity

The present study documented 231 wild mushrooms, distributed across 64 genera belonging to 36 families, 14 orders and 06 classes. Morphologically, all isolates were classified into two Phylum Basidiomycota (n = 221, 95.67%) and Ascomycota (n = 10, 4.32%). Anatomical characteristics were also recorded of all collected fruiting bodies (Fig 2). Some of the economically important genus found are Lactarius, Trametes, Calocybe, Agaricus, Pleurotus, Schizophyllum, Cantharellus, Russula, Boletus, Termitomyces, Pholiota and Lentinus. Relative abundance of the wild mushrooms was compared between the two selected forests at the genus level (Fig 3) and the result showed that Boletus was the most abundant genus at DTR and MNP with 20.16 and 12.1% respectively. Genus Russula(10.48%) and Amanita (6.45%) were the most dominant genus in DTR as compared to MNP with 9.34% and 3.73% respectively. At the same time, genus Mycena and Trametes were dominant in MNP with 2.8% and 5.6% respectively. However, 19 genera were found in common among both the studied locations (Fig 4). Moreover, some rare genus like Favolaschia and Cookeina were found only in DTR. These results indicated that diversity of wild macrofungi varies between these two places due to different climatic conditions. MNP is known for its dense forest where only 1% sunlight can directly penetrate the forest on a sunny day. It has clayey fine soil which is usually with severe erosion. On the other hand, DTR being on a lower elevation with fine loamy soil, which is richer in humus than the soil type found in MNP. It also has an ideal climatic condition like higher humidity and warmer temperature to support mycelial growth of fungi. All these factorscould be the cause that led the higher diversity of wild mushrooms in DTR than in MNP.

Fig 2. Lentinussp.: A. Basidiospores, B. Basidia, C. Generative hyphae, D. Sketetalhyphae, E. Binding hyphae, F. Hyphal pegs.

Fig 2

Fig 3. Relative abundance of wild mushrooms at the genus level in Dampa TR and Murlen NP.

Fig 3

Fig 4. Venn diagram showing the number of genera shared among the two forests (B), present in DTR (C) and MNP (A).

Fig 4

Antimicrobial activity

Out of 231, 76 isolates could be grown on artificial media and were screened for their antimicrobial potential. All isolates were tested for their in vitro antagonistic activity against the selected fungal plant pathogens by dual culture plate assay and showed diverse antagonistic effects. Out of 76, 45 isolates showed positive growth inhibitory activity against atleast three fungal pathogens, with the percentage of inhibition ranging from 25% to 85% (Table 2). All isolates showed positive activity against Fusarium oxy f. sp. ciceri and F. oxysporum whereas C. albicans was the most susceptible pathogen against all wild macrofungi with the exception of 15 isolates BPSM (01, 05, 14, 22, 29, 30, 31, 33, 37, 38, 43, 45, 46, 47 and 48). Five isolates BPSM (31, 33, 37, 38 and 45) exhibited positive antagonistic activity against all the tested pathogens. Among them, isolate BPSM30 indicated highest antifungal activity (78%) against F. proliferatum whereas isolate BPSM41 showed maximum antifungal activity (80%) against F. oxy f. sp. ciceri. The strongest antagonistic activity was found in BPSM33 isolate against F. oxysporum with 85.71% inhibition as compared to control.

Table 2. Antimicrobial activity of wild mushrooms against selected bacterial and fungal pathogens.

Sl. No. Antifungal activity (percentage of inhibition ± SD) Antibacterial activity (zone of inhibition in mm ± SD)
Gram positive Gram negative
F. proliferatum F. oxy f. sp. ciceri. F. oxysporum C. albicans P. aeruginosa E. coli S. aureus
BPSM01 30.23±0.14a 30.6±0.14a 29.05±0.21a 6.3±0.2a 9.63±0.15a - 9.6±0.1a
BPSM02 - 42.85±0.14b 35.56±0.07b - 5.5±0.26bc - 6.36±0.11bc
BPSM03 44.18±0.14b 55.1±0.14d 48.89±0.07c - 6.16±0.15bde 5.36±0.25a 4.36±0.2bde
BPSM04 32.55±0.07a 36.73±0.07b 26.67±0.07a - 5.46±0.2bc - -
BPSM05 51.16±0.07c 46.93±0.14c 40.00±0.07b 6.26±0.11a 9.3±0.2a - 9.26±0.2a
BPSM06 41.86±0.07b 40.81±0.07b 42.23±0.21b - 6.26±0.26bde - 6.26±0.15bc
BPSM07 53.48±0.07c 55.1±0.14d 44.45±0.07b - 5.46±0.2bc - 6.2±0.2bc
BPSM08 41.86±0.07b 42.85±0.14b 46.67±0.21c - 5.93±0.15bc - 6.63±0.2bc
BPSM09 - 48.33±0.21c 45.71±0.21c - 4.36±0.23bdfg - 4.66±0.2bde
BPSM10 30.93±0.21a 28.57±0.07a 26.23±0.07a - 9.33±0.2a - 8.26±0.15bdfg
BPSM11 30.23±0.07a 36.73±0.07b 42.23±0.07b - 4.3±0.26bdfg - 6.33±0.15bcfhi
BPSM13 28.05±0.14a 28.36±0.28a 25.56±0.14a - 6.3±0.2bde 5.23±0.12a 5.63±0.15bdfhjk
BPSM14 39.53±0.07b 30.2±0.28a - 7.9±0.05bc 5.26±0.15bc - 4.43±0.2bde
BPSM16 48.83±0.14c 53.06±0.07c 55.56±0.14d - 6.26±0.05bde - 4.36±0.2bde
BPSM17 33.95±0.07a 32.24±0.07a 34.45±0.07a - - - 5.63±0.11bdfhjk
BPSM18 - 32.24±0.07a 25.56±0.14a - 5.36±0.2bc - 5.7±0.26bdfhjk
BPSM19 34.88±0.14a 30.61±0.14a 33.34±0.14a - 6.26±0.2bde - 4.16±0.2bde
BPSM20 - 48.97±0.21c 44.45±0.07b - 6.96±0.15bdfhi - 4.26±0.15bde
BPSM21 - 30.4±0.07a 34.45±0.21a - 5.23±0.15bc - 5.66±0.11bdfhjk
BPSM22 29.3±0.07a 28.57±0.21a 26.67±0.07a 7.86±0.11bc 5.23±0.2bc - 6.33±0.2bc
BPSM23 - 34.28±0.14a 28.89±0.07a - 5.6±0.26bc - 5.33±0.11bdfjk
BPSM24 28.6±0.07a 26.48±0.07a 26.67±0.07a - 6.06±0.15bde - -
BPSM25 33.25±0.07a 51.02±0.14c 30.00±0.14a - 6.13±0.2bde - -
BPSM26 33.95±0.07a 30.61±0.07a 35.56±0.21b - 6.1±0.2bde - -
BPSM27 32.85±0.28a 33.8±0.14a 37.49±0.07b - 8.16±0.2bdfhj - 4.76±0.11bde
BPSM29 56.67±0.21d 52.38±0.21c 42.85±0.14b 4.66±0.15bde 5.43±0.15bc - -
BPSM30 78.33±0.21f 74.6±0.14e 71.42±0.28e 7.96±0.05bc 9.16±0.15a - 8.46±0.11bdfg
BPSM31 61.67±0.21d 61.9±0.07d 53.56±0.28c 7.86±0.05bc 5.63±0.15bc 5.16±0.11a 6.23±0.11bc
BPSM32 45.03±0.28c 41.44±0.07b 44.77±0.21b - - - 5.5±0.2bdfhjk
BPSM33 75.00±0.35f 73.01±0.07e 85.71±0.14g 7.83±0.05bc 9.16±0.2a 4.33±0.15b 8.6±0.26bdfg
BPSM34 68.33±0.07e 76.18±0.21f 69.63±0.07e - 9.16±0.2a - 7.5±0.1bdfhjl
BPSM35 55.00±0.07d 53.97±0.07c 49.99±0.14c - 8.26±0.15bdfhj 4.43±0.20b 7.06±0.15bdfhjl
BPSM36 63.33±0.14d 55.55±0.56d 66.06±0.07e - 9.43±0.2a - 7.73±0.2bdfhjl
BPSM37 55.00±0.07d 76.18±0.35f 51.78±0.07c 4.23±0.05bde 8.2±0.26bdfhj 4.23±0.11b 7.3±0.17bdfhjl
BPSM38 61.66±0.07d 44.44±0.07b 42.85±0.28b 7.96±0.05bc 6.63±0.2bde 5.13±0.15a 5.73±0.15bdfhjk
BPSM39 44.85±0.14b 45.04±0.14c 42.06±0.07b - 5.63±0.2bc - -
BPSM40 - 39.28±0.14a 37.49±0.07b - 7.06±0.15bdfhi - 4.5±0.26bde
BPSM41 76.66±0.14f 80.95±0.14f 62.49±0.21d - 9.43±0.05a - 7.6±0.1bdfhjl
BPSM42 26.67±0.07a 28.23±0.07a 25.44±0.14a - 6.23±0.15bde - -
BPSM43 56.66±0.14d 55.55±0.14d 66.06±0.07e 4.53±0.05bde 5.33±0.2bc - -
BPSM44 - 34.56±0.07a 37.28±0.14b - 5.73±0.15bc - 5.66±0.15bdfhjk
BPSM45 56.66±0.28d 55.56±0.14d 55.3±0.35d 4.36±0.05bde 7.26±0.2bdfhi 4.93±0.15a 7.56±0.2bdfhjl
BPSM46 56.67±0.07d 58.72±0.28d 49.99±0.14c 6.36±0.15a 9.46±0.2a - 9.33±0.11a
BPSM47 55.00±0.21d 49.2±0.14c 51.78±0.21c 6.36±0.11a 9.56±0.25a - 9.46±0.2a
BPSM48 48.33±0.07c 47.61±0.21c 49.99±0.14c 6.36±0.05a 9.6±0.26a - 9.26±0.15a

Mean (±SD) followed by the same letter(s) in each column are not significantly different at P <0.5 using Duncan’s new multiple range test.

All isolates were tested for their antibacterial activity against three bacterial pathogens viz. P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and E. coli. Out of 76 isolates, 37 isolates showed positive effects against two out of three pathogens and all isolates showed positive effect against P. aeruginosa except isolates BPSM17 and BPSM32. E.coliis the strongest pathogen against all the tested isolates except BPSM (03, 13, 31, 33, 37, 38, 45 and 55). The result showed that isolate BPSM01 displayed greatest inhibitory effect (9.63 mm) followed by BPSM48 (9.6 mm) and BPSM47 (9.56 mm) against P. aeruginosa. The result indicated that isolates BPSM01 and BPSM47 had the most significant effect against S. aureusgrowth with 9.6 mm and 9.46 mm respectively. Isolate BPSM03 exhibited broad spectrum antibacterial activity against E. coli(5.36 mm) and S. aureus (4.36 mm), therefore it can be considered as the most potent isolate for further studies (Table 2).

ITS rRNA gene amplification and phylogenetic analysis

Forty-five isolates which showed significant antimicrobial potential against tested bacterial and fungal pathogens were subjected for the amplification of ITS rRNA gene. The obtained sequences were analyzed using the BLAST analysis tool. All isolates showed 97–100% similarity with the sequence available in NCBI database (Table 3). Most of the isolates belongs to genus Trametes (n = 8, 17.77%) followed by Xylaria (n = 6, 13.33%), Schizophyllum (n = 5, 11.11%), Pleurotus (n = 4, 8.88%), Marasmiellus (n = 3, 6.66%), Microporus (n = 3, 6.66%), Auricularia (n = 3, 6.66%), Polyporus (n = 3, 6.66%), Lentinus (n = 2, 4.44%), Bjerkandera (n = 2, 4.44%), Panus (n = 1, 2.22%), Gymnopus (n = 1, 2.22%), Pholiota (n = 1, 2.22%), Fomitopsis (n = 1, 2.22%), Hymenopellis (n = 1, 2.22%) and Lentinula (n = 1, 2.22%). The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the neighbor-joining method with Kimura 2-parameter model in accordance with lowest BIC and highest AICc values using Mega 5.05. Transition/Transversion values were also estimated using Mega 5.05 (R = 1.75). ITS rRNA gene analysis classified the isolates into 16 genera and 11 families (Table 4). The phylogenetic tree showed that isolates were divided into two separate clades with bootstrap supported value of 65% and 75% respectively. Clade I was the largest cluster consisting 40 isolates and divided into two clusters as clade IA and clade IB. Most of the strain the genera Auricularia and Xylaria, falls in the clade IB group with bootstrap support of 88%. Clade II contains all five isolates identified as Schizophyllum commune strains BPSM (01, 05, 46, 47 and 48) with a bootstrap value of 75% (Fig 5).

Table 3. Identification of antagonistic wild mushrooms based on ITS rRNA gene sequences.

Isolate No. Accession number Closest species with accession number Similarity Identification
BPSM01 KJ865831 Schizophyllum sp. (KR155096) 99% Schizophyllum commune
BPSM02 KJ865832 Trametes hirsuta (KP216914) 99% Trametes hirsuta
BPSM03 KJ865833 Marasmiellus palmivorus (JQ653438) 99% Marasmiellus palmivorus
BPSM04 KJ865834 Trametes sp. (KP686448) 99% Trametes elegans
BPSM05 KJ865835 Schizophyllum commune (AB470852) 99% Schizophyllum commune
BPSM06 KJ865836 Trametes hirsuta(JN048768) 99% Trametes hirsuta
BPSM07 KJ865837 Trametes hirsuta(KC461301) 99% Trametes hirsuta
BPSM08 KJ865838 Trametes hirsuta (KP216887) 99% Trametes hirsuta
BPSM09 KJ865839 Pholiotalimonella(KM496470) 98% Pholiotaadiposa
BPSM10 KJ865840 Pleurotus sp.(KJ670292) 99% Pleurotus pulmonarius
BPSM11 KJ865841 Fomitopsissp. (KC595913) 99% Fomitopsissp.
BPSM13 KJ865843 Marasmiellus palmivorus (JQ653437) 99% Marasmiellus palmivorus
BPSM14 KM985651 Auriculariapolytricha (FJ617294) 100% Auriculariapolytricha
BPSM16 KM985653 Bjerkanderasp. (KM099498) 100% Bjerkanderaadusta
BPSM17 KM985654 Hymenopellischiangmaiae (GU980131) 100% Hymenopellischiangmaiae
BPSM18 KM985655 Xylariasp. (JQ862668) 100% Xylariasp.
BPSM19 KM985656 Bjerkanderaadusta (KJ831843) 100% Bjerkanderaadusta
BPSM20 KM985657 Polyporussp. (AJ542518) 100% Polyporussp.
BPSM21 KM985658 Xylariasp. (KP263113) 99% Xylariasp.
BPSM22 KM985659 Auriculariapolytricha (FJ617295) 99% Auriculariapolytricha
BPSM23 KM985660 Xylariasp. (KM066560) 97% Xylariasp.
BPSM24 KM985661 Trametes elegans (JN048766) 100% Trametes elegans
BPSM25 KM985662 Trametes sp. (FJ372692) 99% Trametes elegans
BPSM26 KM985663 Trametes elegans (JN164936) 99% Trametes elegans
BPSM27 KM985664 Pleurotus sp. (HQ668461) 99% Panusgiganteus
BPSM29 KM985666 Xylariafeejensis (KF619557) 100% Xylariafeejensis
BPSM30 KM985667 Microporusxanthopus (JX290074) 99% Microporusxanthopus
BPSM31 KM985668 Auriculariapolytricha (FJ617294) 100% Auriculariapolytricha
BPSM32 KM985669 Gymnopusmenehune (AY263426) 99% Gymnopusmenehune
BPSM33 KM985670 Microporusvernicipes (KP715551) 100% Microporus sp.
BPSM34 KM985671 Pleurotus pulmonarius (KF932728) 99% Pleurotus sp.
BPSM35 KM985672 Lentinussajor-caju (KP283493) 99% Lentinussajor-caju
BPSM36 KM985673 Pleurotus pulmonarius (FJ379269) 100% Pleurotus pulmonarius
BPSM37 KM985674 Lentinussp. (KC507237) 99% Lentinussp.
BPSM38 KM985675 Marasmiellus palmivorus(JQ653433) 99% Marasmiellus palmivorus
BPSM39 KM985676 Trameteselegans(KF573029) 99% Trametes elegans
BPSM40 KM985677 Polyporusarcularius (KP050637) 100% Polyporusarcularius
BPSM41 KM985678 Pleurotusdjamor (FJ040176) 100% Pleurotusdjamor
BPSM42 KM985679 Trametes elegans (JN164921) 99% Trametes elegans
BPSM43 KM985680 Xylariasp. (JN615250) 97% Xylariasp.
BPSM44 KM985681 Xylariasp. (JX082389) 97% Xylariasp.
BPSM45 KM985682 Lentinula sp. (KF757012) 99% Lentinula sp.
BPSM46 KM985683 Schizophyllum commune (AB369910) 100% Schizophyllum commune
BPSM47 KM985684 Schizophyllum commune (KP326577) 99% Schizophyllum commune
BPSM48 KM985685 Schizophyllum commune (JX848644) 99% Schizophyllum commune

Table 4. ITS rRNA gene analysis classified the isolates into 16 genera and 11 families.

Sl.No. Genus No. of individuals % Family
1 Auricularia 3 6.67 Auriculariaceae
2 Fomitopsis 1 2.22 Fomitopsidaceae
3 Schizophyllum 5 11.11 Schizophyllaceae
4 Gymnopus 1 2.22 MarasmiaceaeMarasmiaceaeMarasmiaceae
5 Marasmiellus 3 6.67
6 Lentinula 1 2.22
7 Bjerkandera 2 4.44 Meruliaceae
8 Hymenopellis 1 2.22 Physalacriaceae
9 Pleurotus 4 8.88 Pleurotaceae
10 Panus 1 2.22 PolyporaceaePolyporaceaePolyporaceaePolyporaceaePolyporaceae
11 Trametes 10 22.22
12 Microporus 2 4.44
13 Lentinus 2 4.44
14 Polyporus 2 4.44
15 Pholiota 1 2.22 Strophariaceae
16 Xylaria 6 13.33 Xylariaceae

Fig 5. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic treeusing Kimura 2-parameter model based on ITS gene sequence of wild edible mushrooms.

Fig 5

Numbers at branches indicate bootstrap values of neighborjoining analysis (>50%) from 1,000 replicates.

RAPD analysis

RAPD analysis was employed to detect genotypic variation among 45 selected strains using eleven random primers, which yielded 337 fragments. Amplified fragments in each strain were ranging from four to twelve bands which varied in size from 200 bp to 2500 bp. Of the 337 amplified bands, 272 were polymorphic with an average of 8.4 polymorphic fragments per primer. The percentage of minimum polymorphic ranging from 34.2% (R1) to maximum polymorphic of 78.8% (R5) was observed with an average of 56.8% polymorphism. Two primers showed more than 46% polymorphism. The dendrogram based on RAPD data was constructed by UPGMA analysis. The dendrogram grouped the 45 isolates into two clusters (A & B) with similarity coefficient ranges from 0.58 to 1.00. Cluster A was the largest cluster comprised 39 isolates and divided into two sub clusters A1 and A2. Cluster A1 consist of 25 isolates i.e. Xylariasp., Trametes sp., Microporus sp., Lentinussp., Pleurotus sp., Pholiotasp., Marasmiellus sp., Bjerkanderasp., Auriculariasp., Fomitopsissp. and Cluster A2 contain 14 isolates i.e. Pleurotus sp., Schizophyllum sp., Gymnopussp., Lentinula sp., Trametes sp., Lentinussp., Marasmiellus sp., Polyporussp. Six isolates of Trametes sp. were clustered together and formed cluster B. In clade B, Schizophyllum sp. was clustered with Pleurotus sp. and they were very closely similar (Fig 6A).

Fig 6. UPGMA dendrogram generated from (A) RAPD and (B) ISSR markers of 45 wild mushrooms using Ntsys 2.0.

Fig 6

ISSR analysis

All the potential isolates were further screened to generate ISSR polymorphic DNA banding pattern using ten primers which varied in size from 200 bp to 2500 bp. Of the 312 amplified bands, 259 were polymorphic with an average of 10.4 per primer. Maximum percentage of polymorphic was observed using primer P1 (92.4%) while the minimum percentage of polymorphic was observed using primer P2 (38.6%) with an average of 72.5%. Two primers showed more than 52% polymorphism. Dendrogram was constructed by UPGMA on the basis of the distance matrix by ISSR analysis. It divided the isolates into two clusters (A & B) with similarity coefficient ranges from 0.59 to 1.00. Cluster A was the largest cluster containing 42 isolates. Cluster A divided into two sub cluster A1 and A2. Cluster A1 consist of 34 isolates and Cluster A2 contain 8 isolates. Cluster B was composed of 3 isolates all belong to genus Trametes. Though, the dendrogram was similar with RAPD analysis, there was a slight difference from RAPD analysis. For example, Schizophyllum sp. BPSM (01, 05, 46, 47, 48) had the closest relationship with Pleurotus sp. BPSM (10, 34) in the RAPD analysis, while it had similarly found in ISSR analysis where Schizophyllum sp. had the closest relationship with Pleurotus sp. Cluster B showed all the isolates belongs to Trametes in the RAPD analysis, while cluster B showed highly similar result in ISSR analysis (Fig 6B).

Nutritional values of selected wild edible mushrooms

Nutritional value and energetic contribution of the selected six wild mushrooms is presented in Table 5. Pleurotusdjamor BPSM41 (21.4 g/100g dry weight, dw) showed the highest level of ash content among the mushrooms studied. Three out of six mushrooms (S. commune BPSM01, Pleurotus sp. BPSM34 and PanusgiganteusBPSM27) showed almost the same level of proteins 30.3, 34.3 and 35.59 g/100 dw respectively. Carbohydrates content is highest in PanusgiganteusBPSM27 (80 g/100g dw), on the other hand the level of carbohydrates is extremely lower in the other samples ranging from 20–80 g/100g dw. Regarding fat contents, Lentinula sp. BPSM45 showed the highest fat content (6.26 g/100g dw) and Pleurotussp. BPSM34 revealed the lowest fat content (2.32 g/100g dw).

Table 5. Determination of Ash, Protein, Carbohydrate and Fat content in selected wild mushrooms.

SN Mushroom Samples Ash (g/100g) Proteins (g/100g) Carbohydrate (g/100g) Fat content (g/100g)
1 Schizophyllum commune BPSM01 6.317 30.33 30.01 5.25
2 Pleurotus sp. BPSM34 8.866 34.30 40.05 2.32
3 Panusgiganteus BPSM27 7.749 35.59 80.61 2.59
4 Lentinussp. BPSM37 5.257 24.05 20.33 2.72
5 Lentinula sp. BPSM45 21.406 16.90 40.15 6.26
6 Pleurotusdjamor BPSM41 8.443 12.21 30.28 3.31

Antioxidant potential

Bioactive properties of the selected six edible mushrooms were assessed by three different assays measuring total phenolic contents, total flavonoids content and scavenging activity of ABTS radical (Table 6). As shown in the table, the total phenol content (TPC) of all the tested samples was ranging from 12.76 to 55.19 mg GAE/g (Gallic Acid Equivalents per gram of dried sample).

Table 6. Antioxidant activity of wild mushrooms.

SN Scientific name with Sample ID TPC (μg GAE/mg) TFC (μg QAE/mg) ABTS IC50 (mg/ml)
1 Schizophyllum commune BPSM01 55.19±1.42 0.410±0.005 3.25±0.97
2 Pleurotus sp. BPSM34 41.44±0.81 0.528±0.003 5.59±0.7
3 Panusgiganteus BPSM27 17.53±1.32 0.373±0.002 11.31±0.84
4 Lentinussp.BPSM37 12.76±0.6 0.382±0.001 11.43±0.82
5 Lentinula sp.BPSM45 18.09±0.71 0.652±0.002 5.52±0.6
6 Pleurotusdjamor BPSM41 52.27±0.44 0.744±0.003 3.73±1.08

S. commune BPSM01 exhibited the highest TPC value among the studied mushrooms (55.19 mg GAE/g) followed by Pleurotusdjamor(BPSM41) and Pleurotussp. (BPSM34) with 52.27 and 41.44 mg GAE/g, respectively. The lowest TPC value was recorded in Lentinussp. (BPSM37) with 12.76 mg GAE/g. Total flavonoid content (TFC) was quantified as milli-gram of Quercetin equivalent per gram of extract ranges from 0.373 to 0.744 mg of QAE/g. P. djamor BPSM41 showed the maximum TFC (0.744 mg QAE/g) which is followed by Lentinula sp. BPSM45 and Pleurotus sp. BPSM34 containing 0.652 mg QAE/g and 0.528 mg QAE/g, respectively. Panusgiganteus BPSM27 (0.373 mg QAE/g) and Lentinussp. BPSM37 (0.382 mg QAE/g) showed the lowest values of TFC among the mushrooms studied.

In this study for scavenging activity of ABTS radical, the IC50 values range from 3.25 to 11.43 mg/ml. The lower the IC50 value of mushroom extract, the higher was their free radical scavenging activity. Among the mushroom extracts we have studied, S. commune BPSM01 with an IC50 of 3.25 mg/ml and Pleurotusdjamor BPSM41 with an IC50 of 3.73 mg/ml indicates a significant antioxidant activity in the methanolic extract of these mushrooms.

FTIR Analysis

Mushroom samples were analysed in ATR-FT-IR (Jasco, Japan) and different wave numbers, functional groups and their corresponding polymer of mushroom sample were presented in Table 7. From the results it was evident that, mushroom samples showed perfect peaks for cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin at the corresponding wave numbers. Hemicellulose peak intensity of wave number 1740 cm-1 with functional group of ketone/aldehyde C = O stretch was greatly reduced in P. giganteus BPSM27 when compared to S. commune BPSM01, it shows that solubilization of the hemicellulose has taken place in P. giganteus BPSM27. The hemicellulose peak is totally absent in Pleurotus sp. BPSM34, Lentinussp. BPSM37 and Lentinula sp. BPSM45; it might be due to the complete solubilization of the hemicellulose part present in the samples. Reduction in lignin peak intensity of S. commune BPSM01 of wave number 2937 cm-1 with a functional group of C-H stretching was observed when compared to sample the rest of the studied mushrooms. Similarly reduction in peak intensity for lignin of wave number 1639 cm-1 and 1556 cm-1 was noticed in S. commune BPSM01 and Lentinussp. BPSM37 when compared to P. giganteus BPSM27, Pleurotussp. BPSM34, P. djamor BPSM41 and Lentinula sp. BPSM45. Functional groups representing cellulose and hemicellulose were observed at wave numbers 1200 cm-1 for P. djamor BPSM41 and Lentinula sp. BPSM45. Similarly for S. commune BPSM01, cellulose and hemicellulose peak with different functional group of glycosidic linkage was noticed at the wave number of 930 cm-1. Reduction in peak intensity for Lentinussp. BPSM37 and increase in P. djamor BPSM41 of wave number 1035 cm-1 with a functional group of C-O, C = C, and C-C-O stretching representing cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin was observed respectively, when compared to S. commune BPSM01, P. giganteus BPSM27, Pleurotussp. BPSM34 and Lentinussp. BPSM37.

Table 7. Assignment of functional group and their corresponding polymer in wild mushrooms.

Wave Number (cm-1) Assignment/Functional Group Polymer
930 Glycosidic linkage Cellulose, hemicellulose
1035 C-O, C = C, and C-C-O stretching Cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin
1200 O-H bending Cellulose, hemicellulose
1556 Aromatic ring vibration Lignin
1639 C = O stretching (unconjugated) Lignin
1740 Ketone/aldehyde C = O stretch Hemicellulose
2937 C-H stretching Lignin

Discussion

More than 200 different mushroom species have been identified from different parts of the world. Previous researchers have shown the importance of mushrooms for the production of novel secondary metabolites having antimicrobial potential [48, 49]. In India, several mushrooms had been reported for their medicinal properties like high antioxidant, antimicrobial and antitumor activities [49, 50]. Few of them are Agaricusbisporus[51], Volvariellabombycina [52], Pleurotussajor-caju [53], Pleurotuspulmonarius [54], Lycoperdonperlatum [55], Lentinus tuber-regium [56] and Lentinussquarrosulus [57]. Recently, Metuku et al. [58] reported the application of Schizophyllumradiatumin the extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles and showed antimicrobial activity against gram positive and gram negative bacteria with anti-oxidative properties under submerged fermentation. Moreover, Ramberg et al. [59] suggested that genus Trameteshas immunomodulatory and anticancer effects.

Among the studied locations, it was revealed that the diversity of wild macrofungi was higher in DTR than in MNP. It is likely that the variation of wild macrofungi in different ecosystems is governed by different climatic conditions such as temperature, pH of soil, physiognomy, succession and geography. This finding was similarly reported by Angelini et al. [60], where sampling methods, soil and microclimate conditions affects diversity of macrofungal species. In addition, level of effectiveness amongst biota and the level of human disturbances may have resulted in difference in species recorded in our study. In our study, we found that diversity of wild macrofungi was higher in the rainy season as compared to the dry season. This finding was similarly reported by Andrew et al. [61] who stated that species diversity was higher in the rainy seasons. Chang and Miles [62] suggested that temperature may be the major physical factor which may affect mycelial growth in mushroom production.

All the wild macrofungi tested were found to have various degrees of antimicrobial effects against gram positive and gram negative bacterial pathogens. Similarly, a previous study has also reported antimicrobial activity from the extract of mushrooms [7]. In our study, the maximum inhibition zone was shown by Pleurotus pulmonarius (BPSM36) showing antibacterial activities against P. aeruginosa (9.4 mm) and S. aureus (7.7 mm). These findings were similarly reported by Chowdhury et al. [7] who stated that P. ostreatus has broad spectrum antibacterial activity. Isolate BPSM45 identified as Lentinula sp. showed antibacterial activity against all tested bacterial pathogens which was in concordance with the findings of Ishikawa et al. [63] who showed that Lentinula edodes has antibacterial action against B. cereus, S. aureus and E. coli. We found that all isolates were highly resistant against E. coli and C. albicans. Previous researchers have similarly reported that both the pathogens were found to be strongly effective against mushrooms [7, 55]. Four strains showed significant antimicrobial activity against all the tested bacterial pathogens. Similar antibacterial results were reported by Barros et al. [64], Ramesh and Pattar [55], Chowdhury et al. [7] and Smolskaite et al., [11] who proved that mushrooms has strong antimicrobial activity and are potential candidates for the discovery of antimicrobial products.

All the isolates were screened for their in vitro antagonistic activity against three fungal pathogens and 45 isolates (19.48%) showed strong antimicrobial activity against at least two out of three tested pathogens. Interestingly, five isolates (BPSM 31, 33, 37, 38 and 45) found to inhibit all selected fungal pathogens, similar findings were reported by Jagadish et al. [51] and Udu-Ibiam et al. [65] who demonstrated that medicinal mushrooms had found to have antagonistic potential. Isolate BPSM45 identified as Lentinula sp.Exhibited the highest percentage of inhibition (55.3%) against F. oxysporum, which is significantly higher than the finding reported by Osman et al. [66] who showed 22% and 17% inhibition of F. oxysporumby Lentinula edodes LC202 and Lentinula edodes LC2141. Most of the selected isolates in the present study showed antagonistic potential against F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri, a potent pathogen causing diseases in several crops. The potential isolates (BPSM 31, 33, 37, 38 and 45) have shown strong antifungal activity which has the potential to develop as a biocontrol agent. Park et al. [67] has used ITS1 (5’-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3’) and ITS4 (5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATAGC-3’) primers to amplify the ITS region to identify isolates of medicinal mushroom Hericium erinaceum whereas Dentinger et al. [15] have used ITS sequences to compare with COI and they reported that the overall performances of ITS and COI as barcode markers are similar. However, the barcode locus that has been chosen for animals, COI, will not work for mushrooms, rusts [68], and probably most other fungi [69], primarily due to the variable and unpredictable presence of large introns in the barcode region. The widely used ITS regions works well for identifying species [70,71] and shows that there is no better single molecular for barcoding mushroom species till today, and its versatility makes it possible to survey and discover new fungi. Subsequently, the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) has been extensively used as the de facto standard ‘barcoding’ marker for many years [71]. In accordance with the previous reports, we have used ITS region for the identification of selected wild mushrooms.

The analysis of genetic diversity is important to understand the genetic variation among the closely related organisms based on their genetic makeup. In RAPD analysis, both Pleurotus sp. (BPSM10 and BPSM34) has been closely clustered together. This finding was similarly reported by Yin et al. [20] and Ro et al.[72] who reported that phenotypic characteristics of fruiting bodies of. P. eryngii clustered together based on RAPD grouping. It proved that effectiveness of the molecular marker in the genetic diversity analysis of mushrooms at the genus level. The results obtained in the present study provided information regarding the genetic diversity of the strains by combined RAPD/ISSR analysis. In the present study, both RAPD/ISSR fingerprinting analysis clearly showed closely related Schizophyllum sp. strains and formed a mono-subclade at the coefficient of 90% and 95% respectively. Similarly Auriculariapolytricha (Isolates BPSM14, 22 and 31) clustered together in both RAPD and ISSR technique, which further proved that the selected markers can be used to differentiate at the genus level. The RAPD technique has been successively used to differentiate among different strains of Agaricus bisporus [73], Ganoderma lucidum complex [74], Lentinula edodes[75]; Agaricusbisporus[76]. RAPD has the potential to survey the entire genomes, and often identifies multiple loci in a single reaction. RAPD can provide a practical tool for breeders and spawn companies to protect novel strains [77]. Trametes strains were clustered together and showed high levels of genetic diversity in ISSR markers, and been used in the identification and taxonomy for more than two decades [78]. It is a very systematic, perceptive and successful method to studygenetic diversity under species level which had been used in Lentinula edodes[79], Cordycepssinensis[80], Auriculariapolytricha[81] and Agaricus bisporus[82].

Among the nutritional contribution of the selected six mushrooms we have studied, Lentinula sp. BPSM45 showed the highest ash content 21.406 g/100g. On the other hand, our study revealed the highest energetic contribution of Panusgiganteus BPSM27 among the selected mushrooms, due to the highest content of carbohydrates and proteins with low fat content. The level of antioxidant activity in mushrooms is largely varied from one species to another and the solvent used for extraction. This could be due to their capability to extract bioactive substances [83]. Apart from these two factors, geographical locations may also affect the bioactive properties of wild mushrooms which could be due to their differences in relation with growth conditions, genetic factors, geographical variations and analytical procedures [84,85,86].

Phenolic group is the major antioxidant compound found in mushrooms, [87]. There are also reducing agents like ascorbic acid and flavonoids contributing in lower values [88, 89]. Phenolic components are potential antioxidants which can donate hydrogen to free radicals to terminate the chain reaction of lipid oxidation at the initial stage. This is due to the phenolic hydroxyl groups which help the phenolic compounds to scavenge radicals [83]. Wong et al [88] reported in methanolic extract of S. commune 25.03 mg GAE/g where as the TPC of S. commune BPSM01 was 55.19 mg GAE/g which is the highest TPC in this study. Flavonoids were not detected in P. Ostreatusin the findings of Matilla et al [90] and Chowdhury et al [91]. It is reported by USDA that mushrooms are considered as non-sources of flavonoids and our finding agrees with the abovementioned reports as the highest TFC observed is 0.744 mg QAE/g.

The DPPH and ABTS assays are known for their reproducibility; ease of application and low cost [92] The ABTS radical scavenging activity of is a more sensitive radical for assessment of antioxidant activity. The discoloration of ABTS radical cation shows the ability of the antioxidants to deactivate these radical species by donating either electrons or hydrogen atoms [93]. As shown in Table 5, the average scavenging activity of ABTS radical is 6.805 mg/ml which is slightly higher than S. commune BPSM01 with an IC50 of 3.25 mg/ml which is the most significant antioxidant activity in the methanolic extract of these mushrooms.

Conclusions

The macrofungal diversity from two protected forest areas in India was undertaken and their antimicrobial potential was investigated. For the first time 231 wild macrofungi were collected and documented from the selected locations. The significant antifungal and antibacterial activity was found in Microporus sp. and Schizophyllum commune respectively. Further testing of these strains for the discovery of novel and efficient antimicrobials should be considered. Microporus sp. strain BPSM 33 showed the highest antagonistic potential against the phytopathogen F. oxysporum with 85.71% of inhibition and could be used for the development of biocontrol agent against F. oxysporum. Furthermore, the genetic variation among the potential strains showing antimicrobial potential was considered by using RAPD and ISSR molecular markers. We reported that the selected markers can be used for assessing genetic diversity of wild mushrooms, considering both marker systems gave similar results in the present study. We also conclude that the wild edible mushroom strains does not have only nutritional values but also can be used as an accessible source of natural antioxidants.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants sanctioned to BPS from the DBT sponsored NER-Twinning project (No. BT/320/NE/TBP/2012), the Government of India, New Delhi.Authors are thankful to the Department of Biotechnology, for establishment of DBT-BIF centre and DBT-State Biotech Hub in the Department, which has been used for the present study. We also thank Dr Lauren Ryder, Biosciences, Molecular Plant Pathology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, UK for critical reading and language editing.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper. NCBI GenBank Accession numbers for the identified strains are KJ865831- KJ865841, KJ865843, KM985651, KM985653-KM985664, KM985666-KM985685.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants sanctioned to BPS from the DBT sponsored NER-Twinning project (No. BT/320/NE/TBP/2012), the Government of India, New Delhi. Authors are thankful to the Department of Biotechnology, for establishment of DBT-BIF centre and DBT-State Biotech Hub in the Department, which has been used for the present study.

References

  • 1.Kristensen HL, Rosenqvist E, Jakobsen J. Increase of vitamin D2 by UV-B exposure during the growth phase of white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus). Food Nutr Res. 2012; 56 10.3402/fnr.v56i0.7114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sliva D, Loganathan J, Jiang J, Jedinak A, Lamb JG, Terry C, et al. Mushroom Ganoderma lucidum prevents colitis-associated carcinogenesis in mice. PLoS ONE 2012; 7(10): e47873 10.1371/journal.pone.0047873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Acharya K, Samui K, Rai M, Dutta BB, Acharya R. Antioxidant and nitric oxide synthase activation properties of Auricularia auricula. Indian J Exp Biol. 2004; 42: 538–540 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cai M, Lin Y, Luo Y, Liang H, Sun P. Extraction, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities of crude polysaccharides from the wood ear medicinal mushroom Auricularia auricula-judae (Higher Basidiomycetes). Int J Med Mushrooms. 2015; 17(6): 591–600. 10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.v17.i6.90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Borchers AT, Krishnamurthy A, Keen CL, Meyers FJ, Gershwin ME. The immunobiology of mushrooms. ExpBiol Med (Maywood). 2008; 233: 259–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kanaya N, Kubo M, Liu Z, Chu P, Wang C, et al. Protective effects of white button mushroom (Agaricusbisporus) against hepatic steatosis in ovariectomized mice as a model of postmenopausal women. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(10): e26654 10.1371/journal.pone.0026654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chowdhury MMH, Kubra K, Ahmed SR. Screening of antimicrobial, antioxidant properties and bioactive compounds of some edible mushrooms cultivated in Bangladesh. Ann ClinMicrobiolAntimicrob. 2015; 14:8 10.1186/s12941-015-0067-3 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yuan ZM, He PM, Cui JH, Takeuchi H. Hypoglycemic effect of water-soluble polysaccharides from Woody Ear (Auricularia auricula-judaeQuel.) in genetically diabetic KK-Ay mice. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 1998; 44(6): 829–840. 10.1271/bbb.62.1898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nowacka N, Nowak R, Drozd M, Olech M, Los R, Malm A. Antibacterial, antiradical potential and phenolic compounds of thirty-one Polish mushrooms. PLoS ONE. 2015. 10(10): e0140355 10.1371/journal.pone.0140355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chang ST, Buswell JA. Medicinal Mushrooms—A Prominent Source of Nutraceuticals for the 21st century. Curr Top Nutraceutical Res. 2003; 1: 257–280. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Smolskaite L, Venskutonis PR, Talou T. Comprehensive evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of different mushroom species. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2015; 60:462–471. 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.08.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tibuhwa DD. Wild mushroom- an underutilized healthy food resource and income generator: experience from Tanzania rural areas. J EthnobiolEthnomed. 2013; 9:49 10.1186/1746-4269-9-49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ramírez L, Larraya LM, Pisabarro AG. Molecular tools for breeding basidiomycetes. InternatMicrobiol. 2000; 3:147–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee JS, Lim MO, Cho KY, Cho JH, Chang SY, Nam DH. Identification of medicinal mushroom species based on nuclear large subunit rDNA sequences. J Microbiol. 2006; 44(1):29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dentinger BTM, Didukh MY, Moncalvo JM. Comparing COI and ITS barcode markers for mushrooms and allies (Agaricomycotina). PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(9): e25081 10.1371/journal.pone.0025081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rajaratnam S, Thiagarajan T. Molecular characterization of wild mushroom. Euro J Exp Bio. 2012; 2(2):369–373. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Das SK, Mandal A, Datta AK, Das D, Paul R, Saha A, et al. Identification of wild edible mushrooms from Tropical Dry Deciduous Forest of Eastern Chota Nagpur Plateau, West Bengal, India. P Natl A Sci India B. 2015; 85(1):219–232. 10.1007/s40011-014-0330-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Paterson AH, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME. DNA markers in plant improvement. AdvAgron. 1991; 46:39–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tang LH, Xiao Y, Li L, Guo Q, Bian YB. Analysis of genetic diversity among Chinese Auricularia auricular cultivars using combined ISSR and SRAP markers. CurrMicrobiol. 2010; 61: 132–140. 10.1007/s00284-010-9587-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yin Y, Liu Y, Li H, Zhao S, Wang S, Liu Y, et al. Genetic Diversity of Pleurotus pulmonarius revealed by RAPD, ISSR, and SRAP Fingerprinting. CurrMicrobiol. 2014; 68:397–403. 10.1007/s00284-013-0489-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000; 853–858. 10.1038/35002501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Barua P, Adhikary RK, Kalita P, Bordoloi D, Gogol P, Singh RS, et al. Wild edible mushrooms of Meghalaya. Ancient Sci Life.1998; 3:190–3. PMCID: PMC3331107 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Agrahar-Murugkar D, Subbulakshmi G. Nutritional value of edible wild mushrooms collected from the Khasi hills of Meghalaya. Food Chem. 2005; 89:599–603. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.03.042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Khaund P, Joshi SR. Enzymatic Profiling of Wild Edible Mushrooms Consumed by the Ethnic Tribes of India. J Korean SocApplBiol Chem. 2014; 57(2):263–271. 10.1007/s13765-013-4225-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bisht NS. Wood decaying fungi of Mizoram. Environment and Forest Department, Mizoram: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Largent DL, Stuntz DE. How to identify mushrooms to genus I: macroscopic features. Revised edn Mad River Press, Eureka, 1986; 1–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bolla K, HimaBindu SVSSSLN, Burra S, SingaraCharya MA. Effect of plant oils, surfactants and organic acids on the production of mycelia biomass and exopolysaccharides of Trametesspp. J Agri Tech. 2011; 7: 957–965. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miles LA, Lopera CA, Gonzalez S, Cepero de Garcia MC, Franco AE, Restrepo S. Exploring the biocontrol potential of fungal endophytes from an Andean Colombian Paramo ecosystem. Bio Control. 2012; 57(5):697–710. 10.1007/s10526-012-9442-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kusari P, Kusari S, Spiteller M, Kayser O. Endophytic fungi harboured in Cannabis sativa L.: diversity and potential as biocontrol agents against host plant-specific phytopathogens. Fungal Diver. 2013; 60: 137–151. 10.1007/s13225-012-0216-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oyetayo VO, Dong CH, Yao YJ. Antimicrobial activity of the ethanol extract of the aerial parts of Sidaacutaburm.f. (Malvaceae). Trop J Pharm Res. 2009; 6:809–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cenis JL. Rapid extraction of fungal DNA for PCR amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992; 20(9):2380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Academic Press, New York: 1990; 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Du P, Cui B, Zhang C, Dai Y. Genetic diversity of wild Auricularia auricula-judae revealed by ISSR analysis. Bio ChemSyst Ecol. 2013; 48: 199–205. 10.1016/j.bse.2012.11.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25(24):4876–4882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Bio lEvol. 1987; 4:406–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. MolBiolEvol. 2011; 28(10):2731–2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Felsenstein J. Confidence limits of phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evol. 1985; 39:783–791. 10.2307/2408678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sneath PHA, Sokal PR. Numerical taxonomy. San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1973. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.NREL CAT Task Laboratory Analytical Procedure #005. Standard Method for Ash in Biomass.1994.
  • 40.Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 1956; 28: 350–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein- dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957; 226(1):497–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reis FS, Helena SA, Barros L, Sousa MJ, Martins A, Santos-Buelga C, Ferreira ICFR. Toward the antioxidant and chemical characterization of mycorrhizal mushrooms from Northeast Portugal. J Food Sci. 2011; 76:824–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999; 299: 152–179. 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chang CC, Yang MH, Wen HM, Chern JC. Estimation of flavonoid content in Propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal, 2002; 10(3):178–182. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolourisation assay. Free Rad Biol Med. 1999; 26: 1231–1237. 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Olukanni OD, Osuntoki AA, Gbenle GO. Textile effluent biodegradation potentials of textile effluent-adapted and non-adapted bacteria. African J Biotechnol. 2006; 5(20): 1980–1984 [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rai M, Tidke G, Wasser SP. Therapeutic potential of mushrooms. Nat Prod Rad.2005; 4:246–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Krishna G, Samatha B, HimaBindu SVSSSLN, Prasad MR, Rajitha B, Charaya MAS. Macrofungi in some forests of Telengana State, India. J Mycol. 2015. 10.1155/2015/382476 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Thatoi H, Singdevsachan SK. Diversity, nutritional composition and medicinal potential of Indian mushrooms: a review. Afr J Biotechnol.2014; 13(4):523–545. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jagadish LK, Krishnan VV, Shenbhagaraman R, Kaviyarasan V. Comparative study on the antioxidant, anticancer and antimicrobial property of Agaricus bisporus (J. E. Lange) Imbach before and after boiling. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009; 8:654–661. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jagadeesh R, Raaman N, Periyasamy K, Hariprasath L, Thangaraj R, Srikumar R, et al. Proximate analysis and antibacterial activity of edible mushroom Volvariellabombycina. Int J Microbiol Res. 2010; 1(3): 110–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tambekar DH, Sonar TP, Khodke MV, Khante BS. The novel antibacterials from two edible mushrooms: Agaricusbisporus and Pleurotussajor-caju. Int J Pharmacol. 2006; 2(5):582–585. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jose N, Ajith TA, Janardhanan KK. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antitumor activities of culinarymedicinal mushroom Pleurotuspulmonarius (Fr.) Quel. (Agaricomycetideae). Int J Med Mushrooms. 2002; 4:329–335. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ramesh C, Pattar MG. Antimicrobial properties, antioxidant activity and bioactive compounds from six wild edible mushrooms of Western Ghats of Karnataka, India. Pharmacogn Res. 2010; 2(2): 107–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Manjunathan J, Kaviyarasan. Solvent based effectiveness of antibacterial activity of edible mushroom Lentinustuberregium(Fr.). Int J PharmTech Res. 2010; 2(3): 1910–1912. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bhunia SK, Dey B, Maity KK, Patra S, Mandal S, Maity S, et al. Structural characterization of an immunoenhancingheteroglycan isolated from an aqueous extract of an edible mushroom, Lentinussquarrosulus (Mont.) Singer. Carbohyd Res. 2010; 345: 2542–2549. 10.1016/j.carres.2010.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Metuku RP, Pabba S, Burra S, Bindu SVSSSLNH, Gudikandula K, Charya MAS. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from SchizophyllumradiatumHE 863742.1: their characterization and antimicrobial activity. 3 Biotech. 2014; 4:227–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ramberg JE, Nelson ED, Sinnot RA. Immunomodulatory dietary polysaccharides: a systematic review of the literature. Nutr J. 2010; 9:54 10.1186/1475-2891-9-54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Angelini P, Compagno R, Arcangeli A, Bistocchi G, Gargano ML, Venanzoni R, et al. Macrofungal diversity and ecology in two Mediterranean forest ecosystems. Plant Biosystems- an International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology. 2014; 1–10. 10.1080/11263504.2014.987844 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Andrew EE, Kinge TR, Tabi N, Thoibal N, Mih AM. Diversity and distribution of macrofungi (mushrooms) in the Mount Cameroon Region. J EnvironMicrobiol. 2013; 3:318–334. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chang ST, Miles PG. Culture preservation In: Mushrooms cultivation, nutritional value, medicinal effect and environmental impact (eds Chang ST, Miles PG). CRC Press; Boca Raton. Florida: 2004; 189–201. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ishikawa NK, Kasuya MCM, Vanetti MCD. Antibacterial activity of Lentinula edodes. Braz J Microbiol. 2001; 32(3): 206–210. 10.1590/S1517-83822001000300008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Barros L, Calhelha RC, Vaz JA, Ferreira ICFR, Baptista P, Estevinho LM. Antimicrobial activity and bioactive compounds of Portuguese wild edible mushrooms methanolic extracts. Eur Food Res Technol. 2007; 225:151–156. 10.1007/s00217-006-0394-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Udu-Ibiam OE, Ogbu O, Nworie O, Ibiam UA, Agah MV, Nnachi AU, et al. Antimicrobial activities of some selected edible mushrooms and spices against clinical isolates from Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki (FETHA), Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Int J Sci Tech Res. 2014; 3(5). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Osman M, Hassan FRH, Ahmed WA, Nady S, El-sayed H. Growth and antimicrobial activity of different mushroom strains grown in submerged culture. J Chem Bio PhySci Sec B. 2014; 5(1): 545–564. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Park HG, Ko HG, Kim SH, Park WM. Molecular identification of Asian isolates of medicinal mushroom Hericiumerinaceum by phylogenetic analysis of nuclear ITS rDNA. J MicrobiolBiotechnol. 2004; 14(4): 816–821 [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Vialle A, Feau N, Allaire M, Didukh M, Martin M, et al. Evaluation of mitochondrial genes as DNA barcode for Basidiomycota. MolEcolResour. 2009; 9(s1): 99–113. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02637.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Seifert KA. Progress towards DNA barcoding of fungi. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009; 9(s1):83–89. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02635.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Hallenberg N, Larsson KH. Intraspecific ITS variability in the Kingdom Fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification. EvolBioinform Online. 2008; 4: 193–201. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Begerow D, Nilsson H, Unterseher M, Maier W. Current state and perspectives of fungal DNA barcoding and rapid identification procedures. ApplMicrobiolBiot. 2010; 87: 99–108. 10.1007/s00253-010-2585-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ro HS, Kim SS, Ryu JS, Jeon CO, Lee TS, Lee HS. Comparative studies on the diversity of the edible mushroom Pleurotuseryngii: ITS sequence analysis, RAPD fingerprinting, and physiological characteristics. Mycol Res. 2007; 111(6):710–715. 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Moore AJ, Challen MP, Warner PJ, Elliott TJ. RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars. Appl Environ Microb. 2001; 55: 742–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hseu RS, Wang HH, Wang HF, Moncalvo JM. Differentiation and grouping of isolates of the Ganoderma lucidum complex by random amplified polymorphic DNA-PCR compared with grouping on the basis of internal transcribed spacer sequences. Appl Environ Microb. 1996; 62: 1354–1363. PMCID: PMC167902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Chiu SW, Ma A, Lin F, Moore D. Genetic homogeneity of cultivated strains of shiitake (Lentinula edodes) used in China as revealed by the polymerase chain reaction. Mycol Res. 1996; 100:1393–1399. 10.1016/S0953-7562(96)80069-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Calvo-Bado L, Noble R, Challen M, Dobrovin-Pennington A, Elliott T. Sexuality and genetic identity in the Agaricussection Arvenses. Appl Environ Microb. 2000; 66: 728–734. PMCID: PMC91888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Yan PS, Luo XC, Zhou Q. RAPD molecular differentiation of the cultivated strains of the jelly mushrooms, Auriculariaauricula and A. polytricha. World J Microbial Biot. 2004; 20:795–799. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)—anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics. 1994; 20: 176–183. 10.1006/geno.1994.1151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zhang RY, Huang CY, Zheng SY, Zhang JX, Ng TB, Jiang RB, et al. Strain-typing of Lentinula edodesin China with inter-simple sequence repeat markers. ApplMicrobiol Biotech. 2007b; 74:140–145. 10.1007/s00253-006-0628-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Liang HH, Cheng Z, Yang XL, Li S, Ding ZQ, Zhou TS, et al. Genetic diversity and structure of Cordycepssinensispopulations from extensive geographical regions in China as revealedby inter-simple sequence repeat markers. J Microbiol. 2008; 46:549–556. 10.1007/s12275-008-0107-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yu MY, Ma B, Luo X, Zheng LY, Xu XY, Yang ZR. Molecular diversity of Auriculariapolytricharevealed by inter simple sequence repeat and sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers. CurrMicrobiol. 2008; 56:240–245. 10.1007/s00284-007-9067-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Guan XJ, Xu L, Shao YC, Wang ZR, Chen FS, Luo XC. Differentiation of commercial strains of Agaricus species in China with inter-simple sequence repeat marker. World J Microbial Biot. 2008; 24:1617–1622. 10.1007/s11274-007-9647-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kosanic M, Rankovic B, Rancic A, Stanojkovic T. Evaluation of metal concentration and antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer potentials of two edible mushrooms Lactariusdeliciosus and Macrolepiota procera. J Food Drug Anal. 2016; 24:477–484. 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.01.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Dursun N, Oscan MM, Kasik G, Ozturk C. Mineral contents of 34 species of edible mushrooms growing wild in Turkey. J Sci Food Agri. 2006; 86: 1087–1094. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Munkhgerell L, Erdenechimeg N, Tselmuungarav B, Amartuvshin B, Bolor T, Regdel D, et al. Chemical composition and biological activities of the Agaricus mushrooms. Mongolian J Chem. 2013; 14:41–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fernandes A, Petrovic J, Stojkovic D, Barros L, Glamoclija J, Sokovic M, Martins A, Ferreira ICFR. Polyporussquamosus(Huds.) Fr from different origins: Chemical characterization, screening of the bioactive properties and specific antimicrobial effects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2016; 69:91–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ferreira ICFR, Barros L, Abreu RMV. Antioxidants in wild mushrooms. CurrMedi Chem. 2009; 16: 1543–1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wong JY, Chye FY. Antioxidant properties of selected tropical wild edible mushrooms. J Food Compos Anal. 2009; 22:269–277. 10.1016/j.jfca.2008.11.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Tamrakar S, Tran HB, Nishida M, Kaifuchi S, Suhara H, Doi K. Antioxidative activities of 62 wild mushrooms from Nepal and the phenolic profile of some selected species. J Nat Med. 2016. 10.1007/s11418-016-1013-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Mattila P, Suopaa K, Piiron V. Functional properties of edible mushrooms. Nutrition. 2000; 16(7–8):694–696. 10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00341-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chowdhury MMH, Kubra K, Ahmed SR. Screening of antimicrobial, antioxidant properties and bioactive compounds of some edible mushrooms cultivated in Bangladesh. Ann ClinMicrobiolAntimicro. 2015; 14:8 10.1186/s12941-015-0067-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Moon JK, Shibamoto T. Antioxidant assays for plant and food components. J Agric Food Chem. 2009; 57(5): 1655–66. 10.1021/jf803537k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Islam T, Yu X, Xu B. Phenolic profiles, antioxidant capacities and metal chelating ability of edible mushrooms commonly consumed in China. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2016; 72: 423–431. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper. NCBI GenBank Accession numbers for the identified strains are KJ865831- KJ865841, KJ865843, KM985651, KM985653-KM985664, KM985666-KM985685.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES