Abstract
Chromosome condensation is essential for the faithful transmission of genetic information to daughter cells during cell division. The depletion of chromosome scaffold proteins does not prevent chromosome condensation despite structural defects. This suggests that other factors contribute to condensation. Here we investigated the contribution of divalent cations, particularly Ca2+, to chromosome condensation in vitro and in vivo. Ca2+ depletion caused defects in proper mitotic progression, particularly in chromosome condensation after the breakdown of the nuclear envelope. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy-Förster resonance energy transfer and electron microscopy demonstrated that chromosome condensation is influenced by Ca2+. Chromosomes had compact globular structures when exposed to Ca2+ and expanded fibrous structures without Ca2+. Therefore, we have clearly demonstrated a role for Ca2+ in the compaction of chromatin fibres.
The formation of a metaphase chromosome is a key process in gene organization. Since the discovery of chromosomes in the 19th century, scientists have been attempting to clarify how they transit from a decondensed structure during interphase to a condensed structure during mitosis. Chromosomes are composed of nucleosomes, which are composed of DNA strands wrapped around a histone octamer1,2. Nucleosomes are 11 nm in diameter appear as ‘beads’ in ‘beads-on-a-string’ structure in low-salt solutions3. However, the organization of metaphase chromosomes is still controversial. There are three major models describing the formation of metaphase chromosomes from chromatin fibres4: (1) a coiled coil model, which is a stepwise progression from nucleosome fibres to 30 nm chromatin fibres to thicker chromatin fibres5; (2) a radial loop model, where loops of chromatin fibres are formed around a chromosome scaffold6,7; and (3) a folded fibre model, where chromatin fibres folded irregularly into chromosomes8.
Three factors are known to be important for the formation and maintenance of chromosome structure: chromosomal scaffold proteins, histone post-translational modifications (PTMs), and cations9,10,11,12. Major scaffold proteins involved in chromosome organization include condensins, topoisomerase IIα (Topo IIα), and kinesin family 4 (KIF4)11,13. Although depletion of these proteins disrupts chromosome structure, X-shaped chromosomes are still formed13,14. This suggests that scaffold proteins are not the only factors contributing to chromosome condensation. Histone PTMs promote nucleosome–nucleosome interaction by modifying the surface charge of histones or by recruiting other proteins to bind to nucleosomes11,15,16. Cations may promote chromosome condensation by cancelling the negative charge of DNA17,18,19. The monovalent cations, divalent cations, and polyamines that promote nucleosome folding have been identified by nucleosome arrays18,20. However, unlike in vitro systems using reconstituted chromatins, chromatin fibres might behave differently in living cells because chromatin fibres exist as high density stages in a cell and they are surrounded by macromolecules and various electrolytes.
Divalent cations, particularly Mg2+ and Ca2+, are known to increase and shift from their storage organelles to chromatin during the mitotic phase of the cell cycle21,22, implicating them in mitosis. Unlike Mg2+, free intracellular Ca2+ is present in low concentrations (nanomolar level) and is tightly regulated. As a secondary messenger, Ca2+ plays an important role in activating or inhibiting many intracellular signalling cascades including those that control cell cycle23,24. However, the precise roles in mitotic chromosome condensation remain to be elucidated. Cations in cryofractured mitotic cells identified by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) revealed a higher concentration of Ca2+ (12–24 mM) on metaphase chromosomes compared with interphase nuclei (4–6 mM)22. Levels of chromatin-bound Ca2+ are much higher than levels of Mg2+ in the cytosol (2–3 mM) and on chromosomes (5–17 mM)22. This suggests that Ca2+ plays a more important role than Mg2+ in chromosome compaction. In this study, we investigated the role of divalent cations, particularly Ca2+, in chromosome condensation in vitro and in vivo. Using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy-Förster resonance energy transfer (FLIM-FRET), we demonstrated that chromosome compaction is influenced by changes in Ca2+ concentration. Detailed chromosome structures affected by changes in Ca2+ concentration were examined at high resolution using electron microscopy. Our findings demonstrated that Ca2+ is important for the organization of metaphase chromosomes.
Results
Effect of calcium ion depletion on mitotic progression
To examine the effect of Ca2+ depletion on mitotic progression, we treated HeLaH2B-2FP cells co-expressing EGFP- and mCherry-tagged histone H2B with the Ca2+-chelating agent BAPTA-AM. Cell observation started with the onset of nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB), which was set as t = 0 min and continued until anaphase when sister chromatids were separated. Prometaphase and metaphase were determined based on chromosome morphology by observing EGFP and mCherry signals, specifically bound to chromatin as previously described25. Depletion of intracellular Ca2+ prolonged the prometaphase stage of mitosis (Fig. 1a). Although the average metaphase duration was slightly longer following Ca2+ depletion, this was not statistically significant. More than one quarter of Ca2+-depleted cells took more than 90 min to proceed from NEB to anaphase (Supplementary Fig. 1). In addition, depletion of Ca2+ during mitosis led to a threefold increase in the number of cells with chromosome misalignment (Fig. 1b). In agreement with previous reports26,27, these results clearly indicated that Ca2+ is required for proper mitotic progression.
Previous reports have shown that chromosome condensation occurs before and during NEB and that compaction of chromosomes dramatically increased after NEB28,29. High amount of chromatin-bound Ca2+ was also detected on prometaphase and metaphase chromosome spreads30, implicating Ca2+ in global chromosome compaction. Defects in chromosome condensation might induce mitotic delay28. Therefore, we monitored chromosome compaction during the early phases of mitosis using FLIM-FRET following depletion of intracellular Ca2+ by BAPTA-AM. Chromatin compaction was quantified in HeLaH2B-2FP cells by FLIM-FRET using EGFP and mCherry as a FRET pair, with EGFP acting as the donor fluorophore31,32. Fluorescence lifetime of EGFP was acquired using time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC)-FLIM. Chromosome condensation brings EGFP and mCherry close enough for energy transfer from excited EGFP to mCherry, resulting in a shorter fluorescence lifetime (τ) of EGFP. With this approach, chromosome condensation could be properly monitored in HeLaH2B-2FP cells in vivo.
Chromosome condensation occurred before NEB in both control and Ca2+-depleted cells, decreasing fluorescence lifetime of EGFP (Fig. 1c). At t = 0 min (onset of NEB), Ca2+-depleted cells had longer fluorescence lifetime indicating that chromosomes were less compact compared with control cells. Chromosome condensation continued after NEB, and the dynamics were clearly distinguishable between control and Ca2+-depleted cells. From twelve minutes after NEB, mean fluorescence lifetime of EGFP in Ca2+-depleted cells was significantly longer than the control cells indicating that chromosomes were less compact.
The prolonged prometaphase stage in Ca2+-depleted cells might delay chromosome condensation (Fig. 1a). Therefore, we compared chromosome compaction at metaphase in control and Ca2+-depleted cells. Treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 arrested HeLaH2B-2FP cells at metaphase without disturbing spindle fibres. Interestingly, metaphase chromosomes in Ca2+-depleted cells were still less compact than control cells (Fig. 1d), having longer fluorescence lifetime of EGFP. As a control experiment, chromosome compaction in condensin-depleted cells was quantified by FLIM-FRET. Consistent with previous studies13,14,28, depletion of hCAP-E, a condensin subunit, significantly increased fluorescence lifetime of EGFP indicating chromosome decondensation (Supplementary Fig. 2). Taken together, these results suggest that Ca2+ plays an essential role in the condensation of chromosomes during mitosis.
Calcium/calmodulin-stimulated protein kinase II (CaMKII) is a Ca2+-sensing protein that regulates cell cycle progression. CaMKII activity is required for mitotic entry33,34 and metaphase-anaphase transition24. Depletion of Ca2+ might inhibit CaMKII activation, affecting its downstream effector proteins, leading to chromosome decompaction. Inhibition of CaMKII activity using KN93 prolonged the prometaphase stage and increased the number of cells with misaligned chromosomes, similar to Ca2+ depletion (Fig. 1a,b). However, in contrast to Ca2+ depletion, CaMKII inhibition reduced the fluorescence lifetime of H2B-EGFP, suggesting chromosome hypercompaction (Fig. 1e). These results indicate that chromosome decompaction is directly induced by Ca2+ depletion, and that CaMKII is unlikely to be involved in the process.
Alteration of chromosome compaction in vivo by manipulating intracellular calcium level
To further clarify the role of Ca2+ in chromosome compaction in living cells, we examined the compaction of chromosomes exposed to different Ca2+ concentrations using HeLaH2B-2FP cells arrested in the prometaphase stage by nocodazole treatment. Nocodazole treatment did not affect chromosome compaction (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Next, we treated nocodazole-treated cells with BAPTA and ionomycin to deplete intracellular Ca2+ and CaCl2 together with ionomycin, which restored the intracellular Ca2+ levels (Fig. 2a). Ca2+-depletion significantly increased mean fluorescence lifetime of EGFP from 2.509 ± 0.016 ns to 2.520 ± 0.013 ns, indicating chromosome decondensation. Re-addition of Ca2+ caused chromosome recompaction because mean fluorescence lifetime of EGFP was dropped to 2.505 ± 0.015 ns (Fig. 2b). The same treatment was also applied to HeLaH2B-EGFP cells expressing only H2B-EGFP, a donor fluorophore. No significant difference in fluorescence lifetime of EGFP in HeLaH2B-EGFP upon Ca2+ concentration (Fig. 2c) indicated that Ca2+ was solely responsible for the changing of EGFP fluorescence lifetime in HeLaH2B-2FP cells.
In substitution of Ca2+, re-addition of Mg2+, after Ca2+-depletion also shortened fluorescence lifetime of EGFP (Fig. 2b) indicating that Ca2+ contributes in chromosome condensation simply as a cation which possibly directly strengthens the neutralization of negatively charged DNA and promotes chromosome condensation as demonstrated by nucleosome arrays in previous studies18,19,20.
In addition to FLIM-FRET, the dynamics of chromosome condensation in living cells were measured using fluorescence intensity35. HeLaH1.2-EGFP cells, which express EGFP more intensely than HeLaH2B-2FP cells, received the same treatment. Three-dimensional chromosome images of HeLaH1.2-EGFP cells were acquired during Ca2+ depletion/addition and projected into two-dimensional images. Chromosome compaction was calculated by normalizing the mean fluorescence intensity of H1.2-EGFP with the first time point (t = 0 min). The normalized mean intensity of EGFP decreased when Ca2+ was reduced and increased again once Ca2+ was re-added (Supplementary Fig. 3b). These in vivo results confirmed that chromosome compaction/decompaction is influenced by the concentration of Ca2+ in living cells.
Structural contribution of calcium to chromosomes
The alteration of chromosome compaction by Ca2+ was further investigated using isolated chromosomes. Chromosomes isolated from HeLa S3 cells using the polyamine method (PA chromosomes) were treated with various concentrations of CaCl2, and morphological changes were observed using optical microscopy. In the absence of CaCl2, chromosomes expanded, increasing the chromosome areas. At the higher CaCl2 concentrations, chromosomes became compact (Fig. 3a). Chromosomes reached their most compact status at 7 mM CaCl2, and further increases in CaCl2 concentration did not affect the chromosome area (Supplementary Fig. 4).
A similar phenomenon was observed in chromosome spreads prepared from HeLa S3 cells; the average chromosome area of spreads prepared from BAPTA-AM-treated cells was larger than those prepared from DMSO-treated cells. Interestingly, when these expanded chromosomes were incubated with buffer containing CaCl2, the average chromosome area returned to control levels (Fig. 3b). This suggests that Ca2+ depletion leads to chromosome expansion and that chromosome compaction can be altered simply by adding Ca2+.
Alteration of chromosome higher-order structure by calcium
Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), chromosome structures were visualized at high resolution. At high CaCl2 concentrations (≥3 mM), chromosomes were compact, and chromosome surfaces were smooth. Globular structures were observed on chromosomes. At low CaCl2 concentrations (<3 mM), chromosomes expanded and became more fibrous (Fig. 4a). In DMSO-treated cells, chromosomes were compact, and chromosome surfaces contained globular structures. In Ca2+-depleted cells, chromosome spreads had fibrous structures on the surface. Chromosome compaction was reversed by incubating Ca2+-depleted chromosome spreads in CaCl2. This reconstructed the compact globular structure (Fig. 4b). Taken together with our optical microscopic observations, these results show that chromosome compaction/expansion induced by the presence/depletion of Ca2+ involves a transition of chromatin between fibrous compact globular structures within chromosomes.
Discussion
During cell division, chromosomes are duplicated by DNA replication, producing daughter cells with their own complete set of genetic information. Chromosome condensation and segregation during mitosis is regulated by several factors36. Here we found that Ca2+, a universal secondary messenger in cells, is important for mitotic progression and promoting chromosome condensation. Using high-resolution electron microscopy, we demonstrated that Ca2+ is required for mitotic chromosome compaction by influencing the transition of chromatin from a fibrous structure to a compact globular structure. In addition, FLIM-FRET experiments confirmed that Ca2+ controls the transition between decondensed and condensed chromatin structures in living cells (Fig. 5).
The packaging of nucleosome fibres into more compact chromatin structures can be demonstrated using reconstituted nucleosomes18,20 or chromatin isolated from cells37. However, these results cannot always be extrapolated to the in vivo situation and should be confirmed using suitable methods such as fluorescence intensity measurement and FLIM-FRET analysis. Incubation of prometaphase-arrested cells in Ca2+-depleted medium decreased chromosome compaction but did not completely decondense the chromosomes like the in vitro situation because other condensation factors in the cytosol would maintain chromosome organization. The fluorescence intensity method and FLIM-FRET analysis demonstrated that chromosome compaction was re-occurred by the re-addition of Ca2+. Because FRET requires two fluorophores to be within 10 nm apart, the FLIM-FRET method provides higher spatial resolution that is close to the dimensions of chromatin. In contrast, the fluorescent intensity method shows the density of fluorophores. Therefore, the FLIM-FRET analysis should be able to reflect the change in chromatin structure more sensitively than the ordinary fluorescence intensity measurement.
Ca2+ concentrations are critical for the progression of entire cell cycle, especially mitosis. Intracellular Ca2+ concentrations increase from mitotic entry in response to ionositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (InsP3), which releases Ca2+ from intracellular storage organelles38. Increasing Ca2+ concentrations during mitosis guide the cellular progression through mitosis, by mechanisms including NEB, chromosome condensation, spindle fibre formation and sister chromatid separation21,26,39. Ca2+ is a universal intracellular secondary messenger; therefore, the prolonged prometaphase stage caused by Ca2+ depletion might be explained by effects other than the compaction of chromosomes. Since Ca2+ works as a secondary messenger, several proteins including CaMKII can be activated or inhibited by changes in intracellular Ca2+ levels23. Ca2+ depletion and CaMKII inhibition prevent transition from metaphase to anaphase by preventing APC/C activation. Inactivation of APC/C perturbs the degradation of securin and cyclin B, arresting cells in metaphase40,41. Here we also showed that Ca2+ depletion and CaMKII inhibition delayed progression into prometaphase stages although this may involve two different mechanisms. Ca2+ depletion reduced the neutralization of negatively charged DNA, which interfered with chromosome condensation. Inhibition of CaMKII probably increased chromosome compaction by preventing its direct binding to chromatin42 or interacting with chromatin remodelling proteins43.
A chromosome is a polyelectrolyte complex; therefore, chromosome compaction should depend on how well the negative charges of DNA are neutralized to allow condensation. Sixty percent of negative charges of DNA are neutralized by histone binding while the remaining 40% interacts with other positively charged molecules19. The most abundant intracellular cations are Na+, K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+. Na+ and K+ levels are similar in interphase and mitotic nuclei, while Mg2+ and Ca2+ levels are changeable because they are released from storage organelles to chromatin during mitosis22. Ca2+ levels in chromosomes increase five times in mitosis compared with interphase22. This cell cycle-dependent change in the distribution of Ca2+ during mitosis strongly suggests that it contributes to chromosome condensation. Ca2+ depletion caused chromosome decompaction, which might prevent or delay the attachment of chromosomes to spindle fibres, resulting in prolonged chromosome alignment at the spindle equator and defective chromosome alignment. Reconstituted nucleosome arrays have demonstrated that compaction is induced by cations including mono/divalent cations, or polyamines such as sperimidine3+ and spermine4+ 18,20, In contrast to monovalent cations which only caused nonspecific shielding of the negative charges of DNA44, the shielding of DNA negative charge by a divalent cation, like Ca2+, is more effective because it forms a dense layer of counter ions not only around nucleosomal and linker DNA but also extended to unburied regions of histone tails and exposed chromatin surface, leading to more compact oligonucleosomes17. Ca2+ might also have specific binding sites in the histone core that confine the mobility of DNA on histones in tailless nucleosomes, stabilizing histone–DNA interactions45. Moreover, Ca2+ might boost chromosome compaction by inhibiting the catalytic activity of Topo IIα and promoting the structural contribution of Topo IIα as a chromosome scaffold protein22.
Even though higher amount of Ca2+ was found on metaphase chromosomes, Ca2+ and Mg2+ were detected throughout chromosome in all stages of mitosis with maximal concentration at metaphase30. In polytene chromosomes, both Ca2+ and Mg2+ colocalized with 81Br− bands which indicate AT-rich regions of DNA30. When tails of core histones were removed, stable histone-DNA interactions were achieved only by the addition of Ca2+ and Mg2+, but not monovalent cations or heavy metal ions44. All these reports suggest that Ca2+ and Mg2+ should play similar role in promoting chromosome compaction.
The distinct chromosome condensation dynamics in control and Ca2+-depleted cells suggests that Ca2+ promotes chromosome compaction after NEB. This is in contrast to other chromosome condensation factors, chromosome scaffold proteins and PMTs that bind to chromatin throughout cell cycle, except for condensin I, which binds to chromosome after NEB46,47. Chromosome condensation is mostly achieved before condensin I binds to chromosomes; therefore, this protein likely promotes lateral compaction and shortens the chromosome axis47. Ca2+ and condensin I bind to chromosomes later than other factors; therefore, Ca2+ might assist condensin I to promote chromosome compaction.
In conclusion, Ca2+ maintains the structural integrity of chromosomes. Ca2+ is important for mitotic chromosome condensation after NEB and might promote lateral compaction of chromatin fibres together with condensin I. Lack of Ca2+ during mitosis disrupts the organization of mitotic chromosomes, causing defects in the progression of cell cycle through mitosis.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
HeLa S3 cells, HeLa cells expressing EGFP-tagged histone H1.2 (HeLaH1.2-EGFP), HeLa cells expressing histone H2B tagged with EGFP at the C-terminus (HeLaH2B-EGFP)48 and HeLa cells expressing histone H2B tagged with EGFP at the C-terminus and mCherry at the N-terminus (HeLaH2B-2FP), were used. HeLa S3 cells were cultured in RMPI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum. HeLaH1.2-EGFP and HeLaH2B-2FP were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum.
HeLaH2B-2FP was established according to Llères et al.32. Briefly, pmCherry-C1-H2B vector was constructed by inserting a H2B sequence into the pmCherry-C1 vector. Then, pmCherry -C1-H2B was transfected into HeLaH2B-EGFP using X-tremeGene HP (Roche) for 48 h. Cells expressing mCherry-H2B were selected by 800 μg/ml G418 (Roche).
Live cell imaging and chromosome condensation analysis by analysing fluorescence intensity
HeLaH2B-2FP, HeLaH2B-EGFP and HeLaH1.2-EGFP cells cultured in 35-mm poly-l-lysine-coated glass bottom dishes were synchronized with double thymidine blocking. Cells were arrested at either prometaphase using nocodazole (Sigma, 80 ng/ml) or metaphase using MG132 (Calbiochem, 20 μM). Before performing time-lapse observation, the medium was discarded and replaced with phenol red-free DMEM containing 10% foetal bovine serum, 4 mM l-glutamine, and 10 mM HEPES for microscopic observation. Cells were monitored using a DeltaVision deconvolution microscope equipped with a CO2 chamber at 37 °C (IX71, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The system was fitted with a 60 × 1.35 UApo/340 Iris oil immersion objective lens (Olympus). Ca2+ was depleted by adding (acetoxymethyl)-l,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy) ethane N,N,N′,N,′-tetra-acetic acid, BAPTA-AM (Dojindo, 25 μM), a membrane permeable Ca2+ chelator, to the medium. CaMKII was inhibited by adding KN93 (Calbiochem, 10 μM) to the medium. To manipulate intracellular Ca2+, cells were incubated in culture medium containing either 10 mM BAPTA, 5 mM CaCl2 or 5 mM MgCl2 in the presence of the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin, for 1.5 h to decrease and increase intracellular Ca2+ levels, respectively.
Time-lapse three-dimensional images of whole HeLaH1.2-GFP chromosomes were collected with 2-μm spacing between stacks. Raw 3D images were deconvoluted using constrained iterative deconvolution and converted to 2D images with maximum projection using softWoRx (AppliedPrecision). All images were processed using ImageJ (National Institute of Health). The quantification of chromatin compaction by measuring the fluorescence intensity of EGFP-tagged histone H1.2, which binds to chromatin specifically, was previously described35. Chromosome areas were defined by scaling the grey value to a specific value that distinguished the whole chromosome areas from the background. Total fluorescence intensity and total number of pixels in the chromosome area were measured. Mean fluorescence intensities in the chromosome area of each image were calculated by dividing total fluorescence intensity with total number of pixels in chromosome area, and normalized with that of the first image to generate the normalized mean fluorescence intensity, representing degrees of chromatin compaction.
Measurement of intracellular Ca2+ levels
Calcium concentration was measured using the membrane permeable Ca2+-specific ratiometric dye, Fura-2 AM. HeLaH1.2 EGFP cells were cultured in a glass bottom dish and treated with nocodazole before treating with 1 μM Fura-2 AM (Dojindo) for 45 min at room temperature and incubating in nocodazole for a further 20 min to allow complete hydrolysis of AM esters inside the cells. Immediately after replacing with new phenol red-free medium, the cells were placed on the temperature-controlled stage of the inverted microscope equipped with a CO2-chamber at 37 °C (Olympus IX71) and a 40 × 1.35 UApo/340 Iris oil immersion objective lens. Fluorescence images were acquired over areas containing 10–15 mitotic cells by exciting internalized Fura-2 sequentially at 340 and 380 nm and measuring emission at 510 nm. Quantification of fluorescence at 510 nm after excitation at 340 and 380 nm (F340/F380 ratio) was used as an index for intracellular Ca2+ levels using ImageJ. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn around chromosome regions.
Fluorescence lifetime measurement using TCSPC
Quantification of chromatin compaction in living cells was done using two different systems of two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (2P-FLIM). Measuring of chromatin compaction of the first system was previously described31,32. FLIM was performed using a confocal laser scanning microscope system (TCS SP5, Leica, Germany) equipped with a TCSPC module SPC-830 (Becker & Hickl GmbH). EGFP was excited with an 880 nm MP laser (Mai Tai, Spectra-Physics, CA, USA) and captured through 63× HCX PL APO ibd.BL objective lens (Leica) with 491–550 nm bandpass in a 256 × 256 pixel format for fluorescence lifetime imaging (90-s scanning time for each image). Laser power, sensitivity of the detector, and pinhole size were adjusted to give a photon count rate between 5 × 104 − 1 × 105 photons/s.
For the second 2P-FLIM system, measuring of fluorescence lifetime was described previously in detailed49. EGFP was excited with 920 nm Ti-sapphire laser (Mai Tai) and acquired through 60 × 0.9 NA objective lens (Olympus) with a 256 × 256 pixel format.
The obtained fluorescence decay curve in each pixel was fitted with single (for HeLaH2B-EGFP) or double (for HeLaH2B-2FP) exponential function using SPCImage software (Becker & Hickl) and custom MATLAB software for the first (880 nm excitation) and the second (920 nm excitation) 2P-FLIM system, respectively. The mean fluorescence lifetime in the ROI was calculated to generate a fluorescence lifetime map. The variation in the fluorescence lifetime is represented by pseudocolours.
Preparation of metaphase chromosome spread
HeLa S3 cells were grown until 80% confluency. Cells were arrested in metaphase with 0.1 μg/ml colcemid for 3 h. To deplete intracellular calcium, cells were treated with 25 μM BAPTA-AM for 2 h. Cells were collected for metaphase-chromosome spread as follows: cells were treated with hypotonic solution (75 mM KCl) for 15 min at 37 °C and were cytospun onto coverslips. Then cells were permeabilized by 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min. Some cells were incubated with 5 mM CaCl2 for 30 min before observation using either a fluorescence microscope or SEM.
Fluorescence microscopy
Chromosome spreads and isolated PA chromosomes were stained with DAPI and observed using fluorescence microscopy with a 100 × 1.40 Plan-APOCHROMAT Iris oil immersion objective lens (Zeiss). The average chromosome areas were measured using ImageJ software. Lines were drawn around chromosomes. In chromosome spreads, the total pixels in the chromosome area were counted and divided by the number of chromosomes for calculating an average chromosome area.
Scanning electron microscopy
Chromosomes were fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde at 4 °C overnight, and 1% tannic acid for 10 min at room temperature, respectively. Then chromosomes were postfixed with 2% OsO4 for 15 min and washed using Milli-Q water. Sample dehydration was performed using an ethanol series (70%, 100%, and 100%) and subjected to critical point drying using 3-methylbutyl acetate, followed by osmium coating and observation by high vacuum SEM (HITACHI, S-5200) with a secondary electron voltage of 10 kV.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out in R using either the student t-test or the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test to compare the mean values. For the student t-test, the test of normality was done using the Shapiro-Wilk test. ‘*’, ‘**’, and ‘***’ indicated p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Phengchat, R. et al. Calcium ions function as a booster of chromosome condensation. Sci. Rep. 6, 38281; doi: 10.1038/srep38281 (2016).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by funding from JSPS KAKENHI Grants A21248040 and A25252064 to K.F., and JP16H06212 and JP25840073 to H.T. We thank Prof. M. Tasaka and Assoc. Prof. M. Furutani at Nara Institute of Science and Technology for the usage of MP-FLIM system. We also thank Prof. A. Lamond at University of Dundee and Prof. T. Kanda at Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute for providing cell lines and plasmids.
Footnotes
Author Contributions R.P. performed FLIM-FRET analysis under the guidance of N.I. and H.M., cell line establishment, live cell imaging and fluorescence intensity analysis under the guidance of H.T. and S.U. SEM observation was carried out by R.P., and K.M. under the guidance of H.T. and K.F., H.T. and K.F. supervised the experimental designs, procedures and interpretation. K.F. directed the project.
References
- Kornberg R. D. & Lorch Y. Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell 98, 285–294 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luger K., Mäder A. W., Richmond R. K., Sargent D. F. & Richmond T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 389, 251–260 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olins A. L. & Olins D. E. Spheroid Chromatin Units (ν Bodies). Science 183, 330–332 (1974). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukui K. & Uchiyama S. Chromosome protein framework from proteome analysis of isolated human metaphase chromosomes. Chem. Rec. 7, 230–237 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nokkala S. & Nokkala C. Coiled internal structure of chromonema within chromosomes suggesting hierarchical coil model for chromosome structure. Hereditas 104, 29–40 (1986). [Google Scholar]
- Earnshaw W. C. & Laemmli U. K. Architecture of metaphase chromosomes and chromosome scaffolds. J. Cell Biol. 96, 84–93 (1983). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marsden M. P. F. & Laemmli U. K. Metaphase chromosome structure: evidence for a radial loop model. Cell 17, 849–858 (1979). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maeshima K., Hihara S. & Takata H. New insight into the mitotic chromosome structure: irregular folding of nucleosome fibers without 30-nm chromatin structure. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 75, 439–444 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maeshima K. & Eltsov M. Packaging the genome: the structure of mitotic chromosomes. J. Biochem. 143, 145–153 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukui K., Takata H. & Uchiyama S. Preparation methods of human metaphase chromosomes for their proteome analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 432, 149–160 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkins B. J. et al. A cascade of histone modifications induces chromatin condensation in mitosis. Science 343, 77–80 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uchiyama S. The proteome of human metaphase chromosomes. Chromosome Science 12, 13–25 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- Poonperm R. et al. Chromosome scaffold is a double-stranded assembly of scaffold proteins. Sci. Rep. 5 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samejima K. et al. Mitotic chromosomes are compacted laterally by KIF4 and condensin and axially by topoisomerase IIα. J. Cell Biol. 199, 755–770 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Equilibrina I. et al. The role of phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 in chromatin condensation in vitro. Chromosome Science 18, 9–14 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- Hayashihara K. et al. The middle region of an HP1-binding protein, HP1-BP74, associates with linker DNA at the entry/exit site of nucleosomal DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 6498–6507 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gan H. H. & Schlick T. Chromatin ionic atmosphere analyzed by a mesoscale electrostatic approach. Biophys. J. 99, 2587–2596 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korolev N. et al. Electrostatic origin of salt-induced nucleosome array compaction. Biophys. J. 99, 1896–1905 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korolev N., Allahverdi A., Lyubartsev A. P. & Nordenskiöld L. The polyelectrolyte properties of chromatin. Soft Matter 8, 9322–9333 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- Grigoryev S. A., Arya G., Correll S., Woodcock C. L. & Schlick T. Evidence for heteromorphic chromatin fibers from analysis of nucleosome interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13317–13322 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tombes R. M. & Borisy G. G. Intracellular free calcium and mitosis in mammalian cells: anaphase onset is calcium modulated, but is not triggered by a brief transient. J. Cell Biol. 109, 627–636 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strick R., Strissel P. L., Gavrilov K. & Levi-Setti R. Cation–chromatin binding as shown by ion microscopy is essential for the structural integrity of chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 155, 899–910 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kahl C. R. & Means A. R. Regulation of cell cycle progression by calcium/calmodulin-dependent pathways. Endocr. Rev. 24, 719–736 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skelding K. A., Rostas J. A. P. & Verrills N. M. Controlling the cell cycle: the role of calcium/calmodulin-stimulated protein kinases I and II. Cell Cycle 10, 631–639 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meraldi P., Draviam V. M. & Sorger P. K. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 7, 45–60 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Izant J. G. The role of calcium ions during mitosis. Chromosoma 88, 1–10 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hepler P. K. The role of calcium in cell division. Cell Calcium 16, 322–330 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maddox P. S., Portier N., Desai A. & Oegema K. Molecular analysis of mitotic chromosome condensation using a quantitative time-resolved fluorescence microscopy assay. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15097–15102 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang Z. et al. Chromosomes progress to metaphase in multiple discrete steps via global compaction/expansion Cycles. Cell 161, 1124–1137 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levi-Setti R., Gavrilov K. L., Neilly M. E., Strick R. & Strissel P. L. High resolution SIMS imaging of cations in mammalian cell mitosis, and in Drosophila polytene chromosomes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 6907–6916 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- Llères D., Swift S. & Lamond A. I. Detecting protein-protein interactions in vivo with FRET using multiphoton fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). Curr. Protoc. Cytom. Chapter 12, Unit12.10 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Llères D., James J., Swift S., Norman D. G. & Lamond A. I. Quantitative analysis of chromatin compaction in living cells using FLIM–FRET. J. Cell Biol. 187, 481–496 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beauman S. R., Campos B., Kaetzel M. A. & Dedman J. R. CyclinB1 expression is elevated and mitosis is delayed in HeLa cells expressing autonomous CaMKII. Cellular Signalling 15, 1049–1057 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel R. et al. Calcium/Calmodulin-dependent Phosphorylation and Activation of Human Cdc25-C at the G2/M Phase Transition in HeLa Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7958–7968 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mora-Bermúdez F., Gerlich D. & Ellenberg J. Maximal chromosome compaction occurs by axial shortening in anaphase and depends on Aurora kinase. Nat Cell Biol 9, 822–831 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rhind N. & Russell P. Signaling pathways that regulate cell division. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a005942 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caño S., Caravaca J. M., Martín M. & Daban J.-R. Highly compact folding of chromatin induced by cellular cation concentrations. Evidence from atomic force microscopy studies in aqueous solution. Eur. Biophys. J. 35, 495–501 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ciapa B., Pesando D., Wilding M. & Whitaker M. Cell-cycle calcium transients driven by cyclic changes in inositol trisphosphate levels. Nature 368, 875–878 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keith C. H. Effect of microinjectecd calcium-calmodulin on mitosis in PtK2 cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 7, 1–9 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu N., Luo K. Q. & Chang D. C. Ca2+ signal blockers can inhibit M/A transition in mammalian cells by interfering with the spindle checkpoint. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 306, 737–745 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reimann J. D. R. & Jackson P. K. Emi1 is required for cytostatic factor arrest in vertebrate eggs. Nature 416, 850–854 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Awad S. et al. Nuclear CaMKII enhances histone H3 phosphorylation and remodels chromatin during cardiac hypertrophy. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 7656–7672 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- Backs J., Backs T., Bezprozvannaya S., McKinsey T. A. & Olson E. N. Histone deacetylase 5 acquires calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II responsiveness by oligomerization with histone deacetylase 4. Mol. Cell Biol. 28, 3437–3445 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brust R. Specific binding of calcium to soluble chromatin. Z. Naturforsch. C Bio. Sci. 41, 917–922 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Z. & Hayes J. J. The divalent cations Ca2+ and Mg2+ play specific roles in stabilizing histone–DNA interactions within nucleosomes that are partially redundant with the core histone tail domains. Biochemistry 50, 9973–9981 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirano T. Condensins: universal organizers of chromosomes with diverse functions. Genes Dev. 26, 1659–1678 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kschonsak M. & Haering C. H. Shaping mitotic chromosomes: from classical concepts to molecular mechanisms. BioEssays 37, 755–766 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanda T., Sullivan K. F. & Wahl G. M. Histone–GFP fusion protein enables sensitive analysis of chromosome dynamics in living mammalian cells. Curr. Biol. 8, 377–385 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murakoshi H., Shibata A. C. E., Nakahata Y. & Nabekura J. A dark green fluorescent protein as an acceptor for measurement of Förster resonance energy transfer. Scientific Reports 5, 15334 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.