Abstract
Introduction
Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa), a plant native to Southeast Asia, has been used for centuries for its stimulant and opium-like effects. Mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, exclusive to M. speciosa, are the alkaloids primary responsible for Kratom's biologic and psychoactive profile, and likely contribute to its problematic use. We purchased several commercially available Kratom analogs for analysis and through our results, present evidence of probable adulteration with the highly potent and addictive plant alkaloid, 7-hydroxymitragynine.
Methods
A simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed for simultaneous quantification of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine in methanol extract of marketed Kratom supplements.
Results
We found multiple commercial Kratom products to have concentrations of 7-hydroxymitragynine that are substantially higher than those found in raw M. speciosa leaves.
Conclusions
We have found multiple packaged commercial Kratom products likely to contain artificially elevated concentrations of 7-hydroxymitragynine, the alkaloid responsible for M. speciosa's concerning mechanistic and side effect profile. This study describes a unique form of product adulteration, which stresses the importance of increased dietary supplement oversight of Kratom-containing supplements.
Keywords: Kratom, 7-Hydroxymitragynine, Mitragynine, Mitragyna speciosa, Drugs of abuse
Background
Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa), a member of the coffee family, is indigenous to Southeast Asia. Kratom has been utilized for thousands of years to enhance work productivity, cultural ceremonies, for medicinal purposes, and as a substitute for ethanol or opium [1–4]. Kratom contains a multitude of alkaloids, many of which are responsible for the biological effects of the plant [5]. Despite being criminalized in foreign countries with punishments of up to 70 years or more [1, 6], Kratom use has become increasingly popular in the USA, where it is still legal to possess and consume in most states [7–11].
M. speciosa contains over 40 different alkaloids which comprise 0.5–1.5 % of the plant matter [12, 13]. Of these, the most clinically consequential are mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, compounds which are found exclusively in M. speciosa [6, 14, 15]. Mitragynine, a major indole-containing constituent similar in structure to yohimbine [13], accounts for up to 66 % of the plant’s alkaloid content [15, 16]. It produces opioid-like effects predominantly via mu- and delta-opioid receptor agonism [5, 13, 17] in addition to modulation of the descending serotonergic and noradrenergic pathways [18]. In vitro characterization of mitragynine receptor binding in the central nervous system reveals the complexity with which Kratom acts (see Table 1) [10]. In regard to its antinociceptive actions, mitragynine is one third as potent as morphine and three times as potent as codeine [18, 19].
Table 1.
Central nervous system receptor binding data for mitragynine [10]
| Percentage inhibition of radioligand binding by mitragynine at selected receptor systems |
| Adenosine A2A 65.66 |
| Adrenergic (alpha 2) 61.92 |
| Dopamine D2s 54.22 |
| Opioid, mu 89.52 |
| Opioid, kappa 90.21 |
| Opioid, delta 7.00 |
| Serotonin, 5HT2C 58.77 |
| Serotonin, 5HT7 64.41 |
| Dissociation constants for opioid receptor binding |
| Mu receptor 204 ± 26 nM |
| Delta receptor 2250 ± 120 nM |
| Kappa receptor 455 ± 47 nM |
A minor alkaloid constituent of Kratom, 7-hydroxymitragynine, was first described in 1994 and is structurally identical to mitragynine except the addition of a hydroxyl group at the C7 position (see Fig. 1) [16]. Because auto-oxidation of mitragynine into 7-hydroxymitragynine occurs [16], this minor constituent may be an innate natural product or arise from mitragynine metabolism within the M. speciosa plant. Accounting for roughly 2 % of the plant’s alkaloid content [16], 7-hydroxymitragynine is an opioid receptor agonist (like mitragynine) but demonstrates potent mu and kappa receptor selectivity [12]. This alkaloid is the major contributing factor for Kratom’s analgesic properties, demonstrating opioid receptor affinity up to 17 times that of morphine [20–22]. It may also contribute to problematic Kratom use, which has been reported numerous times in the literature [10, 23–26]. 7-Hydroxymitragynine’s role in Kratom abuse is supported by Matsumoto et al.’s findings (2005), which demonstrate development of tolerance, cross-tolerance to morphine, and physical dependence in 7-hydroxymitragynine treated mice [27]. Well established is the knowledge that morphine tolerance and physical dependence are secondary to mu-opioid receptor agonism [28, 29]. Therefore, 7-hydroxymitragynine, a potent mu-opioid receptor agonist, is likely to be a major contributing factor to the addictive potential of Kratom.
Fig. 1.
Structures of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine
We purchased several commercially available Kratom analogs for analysis and, through our results, present evidence of adulteration with the highly potent and addictive plant alkaloid, 7-hydroxymitragynine.
Methods
Materials and Reagents
Mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine (purity ≥98 %; IP grade) as free base (purity >98 %) were synthesized in-house. Mitragynine was isolated from dried leaves of M. speciosa as described by Ponglux et al. [16]. Synthesis of 7-hydroxymitragynine was performed in-house as reported earlier by Takayama et al. and Ponglux et al. [16, 21]. Purities of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine were determined by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), 13C NMR, high performance liquid chromatography, elemental analysis, and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Ondansetron (internal standard [IS]) as ondansetron hydrochloride dihydrate was procured from AChemTek Inc. (Worcester, MA, USA). LC-MS grade acetonitrile, methanol, water, and ammonium acetate were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA). Kratom supplements as Phoriatm (Miami, FL, USA) red, Phoriatm green, Phoriatm regular, Phoriatm Borneo white vein, Phoriatm Borneo red vein, Phoriatm Borneo green vein, Phoriatm maeng da blue lotus, Phoriatm maeng da kava, Green vein extra strength Kratom shot (Orbit distributors, Houston, TX, USA), and Viva Zen (Vivazen distribution, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) were purchased from a local market.
Preparation of Standards and Quality Control Samples
The primary stock solutions (1 mg/mL) of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine were separately prepared by dissolving the requisite amount in acetonitrile. The primary stock solutions were further diluted with acetonitrile for the preparation of working stock solutions (WS) (100 μg/mL). Combined spiking stock solutions (CSSs) containing 10, 7.5, 4.5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.05 μg/mL for calibration standards (CS) and 9, 5, 0.1 and 0.05 μg/mL for quality control (QC) standards of each analyte were prepared by appropriately diluting the WS in acetonitrile. The CS containing 1, 2.5, 5, 25, 50, 90, 150, and 200 ng/mL of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine were prepared by diluting 2 μL of the individual CSS to 100 μL with methanol. The QC standards (N = 6, each) were also prepared in replicates containing 1 ng/mL (lower limit of quantification [LLOQ]), 2 ng/mL (low quality control [LQC]), 100 ng/mL (medium quality control [MQC]), and 180 ng/mL (high quality control [HQC]) by the same dilution scheme. WS containing 100 μg/mL of the IS was prepared by appropriate dilution in acetonitrile. All the stocks (MS, WS, and CSS solutions) were stored at 4 °C and vortex mixed. The stability of stock solutions of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine was assessed by comparing analytical standards prepared in acetonitrile form stored stock solutions (6 months at 4 °C) with freshly prepared stock solutions. Both mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine were found chemically stable in stock solutions and the variance between the two less than 10 %.
Equipment and Conditions
The analysis of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine was performed using acquity ultra-performance liquid chromatography (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with triple quadrupole Micromass Quattro Micro™ (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) detector. The standard electrospray ionization (ESI) in the positive mode using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) using parent ion to daughter ion transitions from m/z 399.39 → 174.37, 415.34 → 190.4, and 294.37 → 170.40 with collision energy 32, 30, and 28 eV was employed for the analysis of mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine, and IS, respectively. The cone voltage was set to 34, 30, and 28 V for mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine, and IS, respectively. The source parameters, viz. capillary voltage, extractor voltage, RF lens, source temperature, desolvation temperature, cone gas flow, and desolvation gas, were 4 kV, 4 V, 0.2 V, 120 °C, 400 °C, 20 psi, and 800 psi, respectively. Dwell time for both analytes was set for 200 ms. Nitrogen was used as the nebulizer and cone gas, while argon was employed as collision gas.
A BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 50 mm; Milford, MA, USA) was used. Optimum separation of the analytes was achieved by gradient elution started with pump A (0.1 % acetic acid in water) and pump B (0.1 % acetic acid in acetonitrile) supplying 90 and 10 % of the mobile phase components, respectively. The concentration of the mobile phase component in pump A decreased linearly to 60 % up to 5 min and kept constant up to 6 min followed by a linear increase to 90 % by 6.5 min and maintained up to 8.5 min. The flow rate of mobile phase was 0.2 mL/min. The temperature of peltier-tray was 10 °C, while column oven temperature was set to 30 °C. MassLynx software version 4.1 (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used for control of the equipment, data acquisition, and analysis.
Sample Preparation
The requisite amount of capsule formulations (Phoriatm red, Phoriatm green, Phoriatm regular, Phoriatm Borneo white vein, Phoriatm Borneo red vein, Phoriatm Borneo green vein, Phoriatm maeng da blue lotus, and Phoriatm maeng da kava) was weighted and soaked in methanol (IS; 10 ng/mL) for a concentration of 1 mg/mL. For liquid drinks, a 100 μL of formulation (Green vein extra strength Kratom shot and Viva Zen) was mixed up to 1 mL of methanol (IS; 10 ng/mL). The methanol extract was vortexed for exactly 10 min on BenchMixer (Benchmark, USA) at 2500 rpm. After vortex mixing, methanol extract was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants (10 μL) were further diluted up to 1 mL with methanol (IS; 10 ng/mL). The methanol extracts were vortex mixed followed by centrifugation. The supernatants were injected onto the column for analysis.
Results
Product ion spectra and MRM chromatograms of mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine, and IS are depicted in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. As shown in Table 2, mitragynine was quantified as 9.7–19.0 μg/mg in capsule formulations; however, it was 190.7–396.4 ng/μL in liquid drinks. The 7-hydroxymitragynine was also present in all the methanol extracts of tested formulations for the concentration range of 93.0–593.2 ng/mg and 1.96–2.51 ng/μL in capsule and drink, respectively.
Fig. 2.
Product ion spectra of a mitragynine (m/z 399.39), b 7-hydroxymitragynine (415.34), and c internal standard (m/z 294.37)
Fig. 3.
Representative MRM chromatogram of a mitragynine (1.0 ng/mL; LLOQ), b 7-hydroxymitragynine (1.0 ng/mL; LLOQ), and c IS (10 ng/mL)
Table 2.
Concentration of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine in naturally occurring Kratom leaf and marketed Kratom supplements
| Brand name | Concentration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitragynine | 7-Hydroxymitragynine | |||
| Natural Kratom leaf [30] | 23.8 μg/mg (range 23.6–24.0) | 124.0 ng/mg (114.0–134.0) | ||
| Phoriatm Borneo white vein | 18.3 μg/mg | 593.2 ng/mg | ||
| Phoriatm red | 18.5 μg/mg | 410.8 ng/mg | ||
| Phoriatm green | 11.7 μg/mg | 378 ng/mg | ||
| Phoriatm Borneo red vein | 14.9 μg/mg | 346.2 ng/mg | ||
| Phoriatm maeng da kava | 10.9 μg/mg | 300.8 ng/mg | ||
| Phoriatm maeng da blue lotus | 9.7 μg/mg | 146.7 ng/mg | ||
| Phoriatm Borneo green vein | 17.5 μg/mg | 146.7 ng/mg | ||
| Phoriatm regular | 19.0 μg/mg | 93.0 ng/mg | ||
| Kratom shot (liquid formulation) | 190.7 ng/μL | 2.51 ng/μL | ||
| Green vein extra strength (liquid formulation) | 396.4 ng/μL | 1.96 ng/μL | ||
Discussion
We found multiple commercial Kratom products to have concentrations of 7-hydroxymitragynine that are substantially higher than those found in raw M. speciosa leaves [16, 27, 30]. Our findings strongly suggest adulteration of commercial Kratom products with 7-hydroxymitragynine, a plant alkaloid with potent mu-opioid receptor activity, a practice that increases the abuse liability and addictive potential of Kratom products. For example, concentrations of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine in raw M. speciosa leaves range between 23.6–24.0 μg/mg and 114–134 ng/mg, respectively [30]. Comparison of naturally occurring 7-hydroxymitragynine concentrations with the Phoria products listed in Table 2 demonstrates striking deviation from what would be expected. The historically “minor” alkaloid constituent 7-hydroxymitragynine was found to be 109–520 % more concentrated in 7/8 capsule formulations studied. This research also highlights the need for regulations to prevent boosting the concentration of addictive chemicals naturally occurring in Kratom, a unique form of supplement adulteration.
Kratom is sold on the internet and in specialty stores (i.e., head shops) as capsules, tablets, powder, concentrated extract, gum, or raw leaves for chewing or brewing tea [6, 13, 31]. Reported benefits include anticancer and antioxidant effects [32, 33], antiinflammatory properties [34], appetite reduction, glycemic control, treatment of chronic pain [35, 36], antidepressant actions [37], antidiarrheal and antimalarial properties [1, 38], treatment of ethanol [36, 39] or opioid withdrawal [1, 40, 41], and antibacterial activity [33]. Due to its stimulant and opioid-like properties, Kratom is also consumed for analgesic and recreational purposes [26].
Kratom produces dose-dependent clinical effects [3, 26, 42]. Historically, low doses of 1–5 g dried leaves produced stimulant effects which have been likened to those of cocaine [31]. At higher doses, opioid-like effects predominate [26]. In the past, low dose has been generally defined by users as 1–5 g of raw dried leaves and high dose as 5–15 g [11, 43]. As of 2014, however, the appearance of “super grade” strains of Kratom has redefined the amount of product needed to produce clinical effects. Low and high dosing are now considered by users to be 1–4 g and 4–8 g of dried leaf, respectively [43].
Adverse effects experienced by Kratom users are associated with chronicity of use. Short-term effects mimic those of standard opioid medications and include nausea, dizziness, constipation, itching, or sexual dysfunction [14, 44]. Chronic use results in insomnia, anorexia, weight loss, facial hyperpigmentation, dry mouth, polyuria, psychosis, or addiction [1, 45, 46]. Infrequent findings associated with chronic Kratom use include seizure or coma [10, 24, 47, 48], acute respiratory distress syndrome [49], hypothyroidism [50], intrahepatic cholestasis or toxic hepatitis [38, 48, 51], cardiotoxicity or dysrhythmia [52], and hypertension or nephrotoxicity [38]. Fatalities have been reported in the setting of therapeutic or supratherapeutic levels of coingestants such as sympathomimetics [53, 54], benzodiazepines and over the counter cold medications [55], antidepressants [56], muscle relaxers, and opioids [57, 58].
Supplement Regulation
Kratom is classified as a dietary supplement by the Federal Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 and is defined as “a product intended for ingestion that contains a ‘dietary ingredient’ intended to add further nutritional value to (supplement) the diet” [59]. These dietary ingredients may include vitamins, minerals, amino acids, herbs or other botanicals or their concentrates, metabolites, constituents, or extracts [59]. Unlike FDA-approved drugs, laws surrounding dietary supplement regulation are lax. Adulteration is an exemplary repercussion of such laxity. Well documented are instances of diuretics, stimulants, anorectics, or oxidative uncouplers contained in weight loss supplements [60–74], steroids in performance enhancers [75–80], and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors contained within male enhancement products [72, 74, 81–93]. At least nine people died in Sweden following exposure to Kratom adulterated with O-desmethyltramadol, a potent opioid analgesic. All nine patients had pulmonary congestion and/or edema on autopsy, suggestive of respiratory depression [57]. Because pure Kratom does not appear to produce respiratory failure, these fatalities were likely due to O-desmethyltramadol alone and/or synergism with mitragynine or 7-hydroxymitragynine.
Legal Status
Thailand was the first country to criminalize Kratom under the Kratom Act of 1943 [6]. Today, Kratom is listed as a category V substance under the Thai Narcotics Act, similar to cannabis and psychotropic mushrooms, with penalties of up to 1- or 2-year imprisonment for possession and production or disbursement of the substance, respectively [94, 95]. Since the Kratom Act, M. speciosa has been federally regulated in countries such as Denmark, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Sweden, Myanmar, Malaysia, Australia, and New Zealand [6]. In the USA, some cities and states have banned or are in the process of banning Kratom alkaloids due to health risks [96–102].
While Kratom is not yet regulated under the Controlled Substances Act in the USA, the federal government has steps to limit its use. The FDA, while classifying Kratom as a dietary supplement, also recognizes it as a “new dietary ingredient” as there is no evidence that it was sold as a supplement in the USA prior to October 15, 1994 [103]. A new dietary ingredient is only approved for marketing after a history of safe use or other evidence suggesting reasonable safety of the ingredient is documented [104]. Because Kratom has no evidence of reasonable safety, the FDA considers it adulterated and as a result has placed import bans on Kratom-containing supplements as of February 2014 [103, 105]. The FDA, with the help of US Marshals, has continued to seize Kratom-containing supplements on the grounds of product adulteration with an unapproved new dietary ingredient [106]. Additionally, the DEA has classified Kratom as a “drug and chemical of concern,” given the lack of identified legitimate medical use and the potential risk to those who abuse it [107].
Limitations
Because 7-hydroxymitragynine is a product of mitragynine auto-oxidation, we considered whether the alkaloid is simply an artifact of testing procedures or of plant metabolism. As noted in our methods, stock solutions of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine are chemically stable over a period of 6 months. Likewise, no conversion of mitragynine into 7-hydroxymitragynine occurs in chloroform or passing through silica gel column chromatography; these findings suggest that 7-hydroxymitragynine is not an artifact of isolation [16]. The presence of normal mitragynine concentrations argues strongly that the observed supranormal 7-hydroxymitragynine concentrations arise from adulteration of the commercial products we analyzed, not variation in plant metabolism. We also recognize that it is possible, though unlikely, that the analyzed commercial Kratom strains are derived from M. speciosa plants with above average 7-hydroxymitragynine levels. While the alkaloid content of M. speciosa has been shown to vary based on geographic location and month of the year, the main indole alkaloid contents (i.e., mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine) remain relatively stable compared to its oxindole counterparts, which show much greater variability [15]. To our knowledge, 7-hydroxymitragynine content has never been reported to exceed 2 %.
Conclusion
We have found multiple packaged commercial Kratom products to contain artificially elevated concentrations of 7-hydroxymitragynine, the alkaloid responsible for M. speciosa’s concerning mechanistic and side effect profile [20–22]. The amount of 7-hydroxymitragynine exceeded that found in naturally occurring material by up to 500 %. The recognition that 7-hydroxymitragynine is itself a metabolite further supports the notion of excessive concentrations being due to artificial addition of this psychoactive substance. Although the FDA already considers Kratom-containing supplements to be adulterated [103], federal regulations surrounding possession and use of Kratom are lacking. This study describes a unique form of product adulteration, which stresses the importance of increased dietary supplement oversight of Kratom-containing supplements.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Authors AL, AS, CM, and BA declare that they have no conflict of interest. Authors KB and EB provide medico-legal consultation and receive royalties from UpToDate. Author EB also participates in an NIH-funded research on drugs of abuse.
Sources of Funding
This study was funded by the Center of Research Excellence in Natural Products Neuroscience (CORE-NPN), Grant Number P20GM104932, which is funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as one of its Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE).
References
- 1.Suwanlert S. A study of Kratom eaters in Thailand. Bull Narc. 1975;27(3):21–7. [PubMed]
- 2.Warner ML, Kaufman NC, Grundmann O. The pharmacology and toxicology of Kratom: from traditional herb to drug of abuse. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130(1):127–38. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.Jansen K, Prast CJ. Ethnopharmacology of Kratom and the Mitragyna alkaloids. J Ethnopharmacol. 1988;23(1):115–119. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 4.Grewal KS. The effect of mitragynine on man. Br J Med Psychol. 2011;12(1):41–58. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1932.tb01062.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Matsumoto K, Mizowaki M, Suchitra T, Takayama H, Sakai S-I, Aimi N, et al. Antinociceptive action of mitragynine in mice: evidence for the involvement of supraspinal opioid receptors. Life Sci. 1996;59(14):1149–1155. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(96)00432-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) Drug Profile. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). 2015. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/drug-profiles/kratom. Accessed 16 Jan 2016.
- 7.Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa Korth). Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Drug & Chemical Evaluation Section. 2013. http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/drug_chem_info/kratom.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2016.
- 8.Special Report: Opiates and Related Drugs Reported in NFLIS, 2009–2014. U.S. Department Of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control. 2016. https://www.nflis.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/DesktopModules/ReportDownloads/Reports/NFLIS-SR-Opioids-Rev.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2016.
- 9.Huus K. Asian leaf “kratom” making presence felt in US emergency rooms. NBC News. 2012. http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/03/19/10760892-asian-leaf-kratom-making-presence-felt-in-us-emergency-rooms. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 10.Boyer EW, Babu KM, Adkins JE, McCurdy CR, Halpern JH. Self-treatment of opioid withdrawal using Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa korth) Addiction. 2008;103(6):1048–1050. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02209.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Prozialeck WC, Jivan JK, Andurkar SV. Pharmacology of Kratom: an emerging botanical agent with stimulant, analgesic and opioid-like effects. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012;112(12):792–799. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dargan P, Wood D. Novel Psychoactive Substances. Boston: Academic; 2013.
- 13.Hassan Z, Muzaimi M, Navaratnam V, Yusoff NHM, Suhaimi FW, Vadivelu R, et al. From Kratom to mitragynine and its derivatives: physiological and behavioural effects related to use, abuse, and addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(2):138–151. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cinosi E, Martinotti G, Simonato P, Singh D, Demetrovics Z, Roman-Urrestarazu A, et al. Following “the roots” of Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa): the evolution of an enhancer from a traditional use to increase work and productivity in Southeast Asia to a recreational psychoactive drug in western countries. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Shellard EJ. The alkaloids of Mitragyna with special reference to those of Mitragyna speciosa, Korth. Bull Narc. 1974;26(2):41–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ponglux D, Wongseripipatana S, Takayama H, Kikuchi M, Kurihara M, Kitajima M, et al. A new indole alkaloid, 7 alpha-hydroxy-7H-mitragynine, from Mitragyna speciosa in Thailand. Planta Med. 1994;60(06):580–581. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-959578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thongpradichote S, Matsumoto K, Tohda M, Takayama H, Aimi N, Sakai S, et al. Identification of opioid receptor subtypes in antinociceptive actions of supraspinally-administered mitragynine in mice. Life Sci. 1998;62(16):1371–1378. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(98)00075-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Matsumoto K, Mizowaki M, Suchitra T, Murakami Y, Takayama H, Sakai S-I, et al. Central antinociceptive effects of mitragynine in mice: contribution of descending noradrenergic and serotonergic systems. Eur J Pharmacol. 1996;317(1):75–81. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(96)00714-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gregory TB. Hydromorphone: evolving to meet the challenges of today’s health care environment. Clin Ther. 2013;35(12):2007–2027. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Matsumoto K, Horie S, Ishikawa H, Takayama H, Aimi N, Ponglux D, et al. Antinociceptive effect of 7-hydroxymitragynine in mice: discovery of an orally active opioid analgesic from the Thai medicinal herb Mitragyna speciosa. Life Sci. 2004;74(17):2143–2155. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Takayama H, Ishikawa H, Kurihara M, Kitajima M, Aimi N, Ponglux D, et al. Studies on the synthesis and opioid agonistic activities of mitragynine-related indole alkaloids: discovery of opioid agonists structurally different from other opioid ligands. J Med Chem. 2002;45(9):1949–1956. doi: 10.1021/jm010576e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Horie S, Koyama F, Takayama H, Ishikawa H, Aimi N, Ponglux D, et al. Indole alkaloids of a Thai medicinal herb, Mitragyna speciosa, that has opioid agonistic effect in guinea-pig ileum. Planta Med. 2005;71(3):231–236. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-837822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Adkins JE, Boyer EW, McCurdy CR. Mitragyna speciosa, a psychoactive tree from Southeast Asia with opioid activity. Curr Top Med Chem. 2011;11(9):1165–1175. doi: 10.2174/156802611795371305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Roche KM, Hart K, Sangalli B. Kratom: a case of a legal high. Clin Toxicol. 2008;46(7):598. [Google Scholar]
- 25.McWhirter L, Morris S. A case report of inpatient detoxification after Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) dependence. Eur Addict Res. 2010;16(4):229–231. doi: 10.1159/000320288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Babu KM, McCurdy CR, Boyer EW. Opioid receptors and legal highs: Salvia divinorum and Kratom. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008;46(2):146–152. doi: 10.1080/15563650701241795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Matsumoto K, Horie S, Takayama H, Ishikawa H, Aimi N, Ponglux D, et al. Antinociception, tolerance and withdrawal symptoms induced by 7-hydroxymitragynine, an alkaloid from the Thai medicinal herb Mitragyna speciosa. Life Sci. 2005;78(1):2–7. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.10.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Narita M, Funada M, Suzuki T. Regulations of opioid dependence by opioid receptor types. Pharmacol Ther. 2001;89(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(00)00099-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Matthes HW, Maldonado R, Simonin F, Valverde O, Slowe S, Kitchen I, et al. Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the mu-opioid-receptor gene. Nature. 1996;383(6603):819–823. doi: 10.1038/383819a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kikura-Hanajiri R, Kawamura M, Maruyama T, Kitajima M, Takayama H, Goda Y. Simultaneous analysis of mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine, and other alkaloids in the psychotropic plant “Kratom” (Mitragyna speciosa) by LC-ESI-MS. Forensic Toxicol. 2009;27(2):67–74. doi: 10.1007/s11419-009-0070-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Grewal KS. Observations on the pharmacology of mitragynine. American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1932;46(3):251–271. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Goh TB, Koh RY, Mordi MN, Mansor SM. Antioxidant value and antiproliferative efficacy of mitragynine and a silane reduced analogue. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(14):5659–5665. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.14.5659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Parthasarathy S, Bin Azizi J, Ramanathan S, Ismail S, Sasidharan S, Said MI, et al. Evaluation of antioxidant and antibacterial activities of aqueous, methanolic and alkaloid extracts from Mitragyna speciosa (Rubiaceae Family) leaves. Molecules. Mol Divers Preserv Int. 2009;14(10):3964–3974. doi: 10.3390/molecules14103964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Utar Z, Majid MIA, Adenan MI, Jamil MFA, Lan TM. Mitragynine inhibits the COX-2 mRNA expression and prostaglandin E2 production induced by lipopolysaccharide in RAW264.7 macrophage cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;136(1):75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Burkill IH, Haniff M. Malay village medicine, prescriptions collected. Gard Bull. 1930;6:165–321. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tanguay P. Kratom in Thailand. Legis Reform Drug Policies. 2011;13:1–16. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Idayu NF, Hidayat MT, Moklas MAM, Sharida F, Raudzah ARN, Shamima AR, et al. Antidepressant-like effect of mitragynine isolated from Mitragyna speciosa Korth in mice model of depression. Phytomedicine. 2011;18(5):402–407. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2010.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Harizal SN, Mansor SM, Hasnan J, Tharakan JKJ, Abdullah J. Acute toxicity study of the standardized methanolic extract of Mitragyna speciosa Korth in rodent. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010;131(2):404–409. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kumarnsit E, Keawpradub N, Nuankaew W. Effect of Mitragyna speciosa aqueous extract on ethanol withdrawal symptoms in mice. Fitoterapia. 2007;78(3):182–185. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2006.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vicknasingam B, Narayanan S, Beng GT, Mansor SM. The informal use of ketum (Mitragyna speciosa) for opioid withdrawal in the northern states of peninsular Malaysia and implications for drug substitution therapy. Int J Drug Policy. 2010;21(4):283–288. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ahmad K, Aziz Z. Mitragyna speciosa use in the northern states of Malaysia: a cross-sectional study. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;141(1):446–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shellard EJ. Ethnopharmacology of Kratom and the Mitragyna alkaloids. J Ethnopharmacol. 1989;25(1):123–124. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(89)90053-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Erowid. Kratom Dosage. The Vaults of Erowid. 2015. https://www.erowid.org/plants/kratom/kratom_dose.shtml. Accessed 23 Jan 2016.
- 44.Erowid. Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) Effects. The Vaults of Erowid. 2016. https://www.erowid.org/plants/kratom/kratom_effects.shtml. Accessed 23 Jan 2016.
- 45.Thuan LC. Addiction to Mitragyna speciosa. Proc Alumni Assoc. 1957;10:322–324. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yusoff NHM, Suhaimi FW, Vadivelu RK, Hassan Z, Rümler A, Rotter A, et al. Abuse potential and adverse cognitive effects of mitragynine (Kratom. Addict Biol. 2014;21:98–110. doi: 10.1111/adb.12185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nelsen JL, Lapoint J, Hodgman MJ, Aldous KM. Seizure and coma following Kratom (Mitragynina speciosa Korth) exposure. J Med Toxicol. 2010;6(4):424–426. doi: 10.1007/s13181-010-0079-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lu J, Wei H, Wu J, Jamil MFA, Tan ML, Adenan MI, et al. Evaluation of the cardiotoxicity of mitragynine and its analogues using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Clin Toxicol. 2014;9(12):e115648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cabellon M, Aris R, Pathak V. Adult respiratory distress syndrome secondary to the use of herbal drug kratom. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:A6492. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sheleg SV, Collins GB. A coincidence of addiction to “Kratom” and severe primary hypothyroidism. J Addict Med. 2011;5(4):300–301. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e318221fbfa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kapp FG, Maurer HH, Auwärter V, Winkelmann M, Hermanns-Clausen M. Intrahepatic cholestasis following abuse of powdered Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) J Med Toxicol. 2011;7(3):227–231. doi: 10.1007/s13181-011-0155-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lu J, Wei H, Wu J, Jamil M, Tan ML, Adenan MI. Evaluation of the cardiotoxicity of mitragynine and its analogues using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Holler JM, Vorce SP, McDonough-Bender PC, Joseph Magluilo J, Solomon CJ, Levine B. A drug toxicity death involving propylhexedrine and mitragynine. J Anal Toxicol. 2011;35(1):54–59. doi: 10.1093/anatox/35.1.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tungtananuwat W, Lawanprasert S. Fatal 4×100: homemade Kratom juice cocktail. J Health Res. 2010;24(1):43–47. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Neerman MF, Frost RE, Deking J. A drug fatality involving Kratom. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58(s1):S278–S279. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.McIntyre IM, Trochta A, Stolberg S, Campman SC. Mitragynine “Kratom” related fatality: a case report with postmortem concentrations. J Anal Toxicol. 2015;39(2):152–155. doi: 10.1093/jat/bku137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kronstrand R, Roman M, Thelander G, Eriksson A. Unintentional fatal intoxications with mitragynine and O-desmethyltramadol from the herbal blend krypton. J Anal Toxicol. 2011;35(4):242–247. doi: 10.1093/anatox/35.4.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Scott TM, Yeakel JK, Logan BK. Identification of mitragynine and O-desmethyltramadol in Kratom and legal high products sold online. Drug Test Anal. 2014;6(9):959–963. doi: 10.1002/dta.1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements. 1994. https://ods.od.nih.gov/About/DSHEA_Wording.aspx. Accessed 31 Jan 2016.
- 60.Petróczi A, Ocampo JAV, Shah I, Jenkinson C, New R, James RA, et al. Russian roulette with unlicensed fat-burner drug 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP): evidence from a multidisciplinary study of the internet, bodybuilding supplements and DNP users. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015;10(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 61.Rebiere H, Guinot P, Civade C, Bonnet P-A, Nicolas A. Detection of hazardous weight-loss substances in adulterated slimming formulations using ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography with diode-array detection. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2012;29(2):161–171. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2011.638676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Venhuis BJ, Zwaagstra ME, Van den Berg J. Trends in drug substances detected in illegal weight-loss medicines and dietary supplements. RIVM Report. 2009;370030002:1–37.
- 63.Jung J, Hermanns-Clausen M, Weinmann W. Anorectic sibutramine detected in a Chinese herbal drug for weight loss. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;161(2–3):221–222. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wang J, Chen B, Yao S. Analysis of six synthetic adulterants in herbal weight-reducing dietary supplements by LC electrospray ionization-MS. Food Addit Contam. 2008;25(7):822–830. doi: 10.1080/02652030801946553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Vaysse J, Balayssac S, Gilard V, Desoubdzanne D, Malet-Martino M, Martino R. Analysis of adulterated herbal medicines and dietary supplements marketed for weight loss by DOSY 1H-NMR. Food Addit Contam. 2010;27(7):903–916. doi: 10.1080/19440041003705821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shi Y, Sun C, Gao B, Sun A. Development of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous determination of eight adulterants in slimming functional foods. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218(42):7655–7662. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.De Carvalho LM, Cohen PA, Silva CV, Moreira APL, Falcão TM, Molin TRD, et al. A new approach to determining pharmacologic adulteration of herbal weight loss products. Food Addit Contam: Part A. 2012;29(11):1661–1667. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2012.706834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Park S-R, Lee JG, Roh SH, Kim G, Kwon CH, Park HR, et al. Determination of PDE-5 inhibitors and appetite suppressants in adulterated dietary supplements using LC/PDA and LC/MS. Food Addit Contam: Part B. 2012;5(1):29–32. doi: 10.1080/19393210.2012.656706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Song F, Monroe D, El-Demerdash A, Palmer C. Screening for multiple weight loss and related drugs in dietary supplement materials by flow injection tandem mass spectrometry and their confirmation by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014;88:136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kim HJ, Lee JH, Park HJ, Cho S-H, Cho S, Kim WS. Monitoring of 29 weight loss compounds in foods and dietary supplements by LC-MS/MS. Food Addit Contam: Part A. 2014;31(5):777–783. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2014.888497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hachem R, Malet-Martino M, Gilard V. First identification and quantification of lorcaserin in an herbal slimming dietary supplement. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014;98:94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Reeuwijk NM, Venhuis BJ, de Kaste D, Hoogenboom RLAP, Rietjens IMCM, Martena MJ. Active pharmaceutical ingredients detected in herbal food supplements for weight loss sampled on the Dutch market. Food Addit Contam: Part A. 2014;31(11):1783–1793. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2014.958574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mathon C, Ankli A, Reich E, Bieri S, Christen P. Screening and determination of sibutramine in adulterated herbal slimming supplements by HPTLC-UV densitometry. Food Addit Contam: Part A. 2013;31(1):15–20. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2013.861934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Strano-Rossi S, Odoardi S, Castrignanò E, Serpelloni G, Chiarotti M. Liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS) determination of stimulants, anorectic drugs and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5I) in food supplements. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015;106:144–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Maughan RJ. Contamination of dietary supplements and positive drug tests in sport. J Sports Sci. 2005;23(9):883–889. doi: 10.1080/02640410400023258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Maughan RJ, Greenhaff PL, Hespel P. Dietary supplements for athletes: emerging trends and recurring themes. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(suppl 1):S57–S66. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.587446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Geyer H, Parr MK, Mareck U, Reinhart U, Schrader Y, Schänzer W. Analysis of non-hormonal nutritional supplements for anabolic-androgenic steroids—results of an international study. Int J Sports Med. 2004;25(2):124–129. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-819955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Geyer H, Parr MK, Koehler K, Mareck U, Schänzer W, Thevis M. Nutritional supplements cross-contaminated and faked with doping substances. J Mass Spectrom. 2008;43(7):892–902. doi: 10.1002/jms.1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.van der Merwe PJ, Grobbelaar E. Unintentional doping through the use of contaminated nutritional supplements. S Afr Med J. 2005;95(7):510–511. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Pipe A, Ayotte C. Nutritional supplements and doping. Clin J Sport Med. 2002;12(4):245–249. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200207000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Campbell N, Clark JP, Stecher VJ, Thomas JW, Callanan AC, Donnelly BF, et al. Adulteration of purported herbal and natural sexual performance enhancement dietary supplements with synthetic phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. J Sex Med. 2013;10(7):1842–1849. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gratz SR, Flurer CL, Wolnik KA. Analysis of undeclared synthetic phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in dietary supplements and herbal matrices by LC–ESI–MS and LC–UV. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2004;36(3):525–533. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ng CS, Law TY, Cheung YK, Ng PC, Choi KK. Development of a screening method for the detection of analogues of sildenafil and vardenafil by the use of liquid chromatograph coupled with triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer. analytical methods. Royal Soc Chem. 2010;2(7):890–896. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Savaliya AA, Shah RP, Prasad B, Singh S. Screening of Indian aphrodisiac ayurvedic/herbal healthcare products for adulteration with sildenafil, tadalafil and/or vardenafil using LC/PDA and extracted ion LC–MS/TOF. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;52(3):406–409. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zhang Y, Huang Z, Ding L, Yan H, Wang M, Zhu S. Simultaneous determination of yohimbine, sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil in dietary supplements using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci. 2010;33(14):2109–14. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200900841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Toomey VM, Litzau JJ, Flurer CL. Isolation and structural characterization of two tadalafil analogs found in dietary supplements. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012;59:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ren Y, Wu C, Zhang J. Simultaneous screening and determination of 18 illegal adulterants in herbal medicines and health foods for male sexual potency by ultra-fast liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci. 2012;35(21):2847–2857. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201200280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Vaysse J, Gilard V, Balayssac S, Zedde C, Martino R, Malet-Martino M. Identification of a novel sildenafil analogue in an adulterated herbal supplement. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012;59:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Jankovics P, Lohner S, Darcsi A, Németh-Palotás J, Béni S. Detection and structure elucidation of hydroxythiovardenafil as an adulterant in a herbal dietary supplement. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2013;74:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2012.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Lee E-S, Kim JW, Lee JH, Han KM, Cho S, Hwang I, et al. Identification of a new tadalafil analogue found in a dietary supplement. Food Addit Contam: Part A. 2013;30(4):621–626. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2013.766766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lee E-S, Lee JH, Han KM, Kim JW, Hwang IS, Cho S, et al. Simultaneous determination of 38 phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in illicit erectile dysfunction products by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2013;83:171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Lebel P, Gagnon J, Furtos A, Waldron KC. A rapid, quantitative liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry screening method for 71 active and 11 natural erectile dysfunction ingredients present in potentially adulterated or counterfeit products. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1343:143–151. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.03.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Damiano F, Silva C, Gregori A, Vacondio F, Mor M, Menozzi M, et al. Analysis of illicit dietary supplements sold in the Italian market: identification of a sildenafil thioderivative as adulterant using UPLC–TOF/MS and GC/MS. Sci Justice. 2014;54(3):228–237. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Thailand Narcotics Control Division. Table of controlled narcotic drugs in Thailand. 2015. http://narcotic.fda.moph.go.th/welcome/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/NARCO-list-update-05.10.2015.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 95.Adulyadej B. Narcotics Act. Thailand Narcotics Control Division. 1979. http://narcotic.fda.moph.go.th/english/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Narcotics-Act-B.E.2522.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 96.House Enrolled Act No. 1196. In: Second Regular Session 117th General Assembly. 2012. http://www.in.gov/legislative/bills/2012/HE/HE1196.1.html. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 97.Beavers M. Senate Bill 48. General Assembly of the State of Tennessee. 2013. http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/108/Bill/SB0048.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 98.Vermont Department of Health. Regulated Drug Rule. 2016. http://healthvermont.gov/regs/documents/regulated_drugs_rule.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 99.Louisiana State Legislature. RS 40:989.3. 2012. https://legis.la.gov/legis/Law.aspx?d=814206. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 100.Uniform Controlled Substances Act. Wisconsin State Legislature. 2016. http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/961/II/14. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 101.House File 2355 [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 10]. Available from: http://coolice.legis.iowa.gov/linc/85/external/HF2355_Introduced.html.
- 102.Kratom Control Act. Illinois General Assembly. 2015. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=3573&ChapterID=53. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 103.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Import Alert 54–15. 2016. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cms_ia/importalert_1137.html. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 104.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. New Dietary Ingredients Notification Process. 2016. http://www.fda.gov/Food/DietarySupplements/NewDietaryIngredientsNotificationProcess/default.htm. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 105.United States Government Publishing Office. 21- Food and Drugs §§ 342. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2010-title21/pdf/USCODE-2010-title21-chap9-subchapIV-sec342.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2016.
- 106.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. US Marshals Seize Dietary Supplements Containing Kratom. 2016. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm480344.htm. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 107.U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration. Drugs of Abuse. 2015. http://www.dea.gov/pr/multimedia-library/publications/drug_of_abuse.pdf#page=84. Accessed 10 May 2016.
- 108.Yoburn BC, Shah S, Chan K, Duttaroy A, Davis T. Supersensitivity to opioid analgesics following chronic opioid antagonist treatment: relationship to receptor selectivity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1995;51(2–3):535–539. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)00375-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



