Iodine Uptake Patterns on Post-ablation Whole Body Scans are Related to Elevated Serum Thyroglobulin Levels After Radioactive Iodine Therapy in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Abstract

Purpose

Serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level is frequently elevated shortly after radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation therapy. The authors studied the relationship between the elevation of serum Tg after RAI therapy and iodine uptake pattern on post-ablation whole body scans (RxWBSs) in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).

Materials and Methods

The study subjects were patients with PTC that had undergone first RAI therapy with thyroid hormone withdrawal after total thyroidectomy. Patients with a high level of serum anti-Tg antibody (TgAb, ≥ 60 U/mL), possible regional or distant metastasis as determined by pre-ablation or post-ablation studies, and negative iodine uptake of the anterior neck on RxWBS were excluded. Serum Tg was checked twice, that is, 7 days after (post-ablation Tg) and on the day of RAI therapy (pre-ablation Tg). Ratio of pre-ablation Tg to post-ablation Tg (Tg ratio) was used to assess changes in serum Tg levels after RAI therapy. Patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of midline uptake above the thyroidectomy bed on RxWBS (negative (group 1) or positive (group 2) midline uptake). Variables were subjected to analysis to identify differences between the two groups.

Results

Two hundred and fifty patients were enrolled in this study; 101 in group 1 and 149 in group 2. Based on univariate analysis, post-ablation Tg (8.12 ± 11.05 vs. 34.12 ± 54.31; P < 0.001) and Tg ratio (7.81 ± 8.98 vs. 20.01 ± 19.84; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in group 2. On the other hand, gender, tumor (T) stage, lymph node (N) stage, size, multiplicity or bilaterality of primary tumor, dose of ¹³¹I, serum TgAb and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level (before or after RAI therapy) were not significantly different in the two groups. Variables with P values of < 0.25 by univariate analysis were subjected to multivariate analysis, which showed post-ablation Tg (OR 1.060, 95 % CI = 1.028–1.092; P < 0.001) and Tg ratio (OR 1.059, 95 % CI = 1.028–1.092; P = 0.001) were significantly higher in group 2.

Conclusion

Serum Tg level after RAI therapy was significantly higher in patients with midline uptake on RxWBS, compared with patients without midline uptake on RxWBS. Further investigations are needed to reveal the correlation between serum Tg elevation and clinical outcome according to the presence of midline uptake.

Introduction

An elevated serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level before radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy is a well-known prognostic factor for the prediction of early therapeutic failure in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) [1–6]. However, pre-ablation Tg level does not actually reflect therapeutic responsiveness to RAI.

In previous studies, the effectiveness of RAI therapy on remnant thyroid tissue was evaluated by measuring changes in serum Tg levels in patients with DTC [7–9]. In those studies, serum Tg was measured twice, that is, just before the administration of RAI and at 3 or 5 days after RAI therapy. The results showed that serum Tg was generally elevated after RAI therapy and the amounts of Tg elevation yielded better or equal predictions of ablation failure than pre-ablation Tg levels.

Iodine uptake patterns on post-ablation whole body scans (RxWBS) are considered as an important prognostic factor in DTC, especially with respect to the detection of remaining locoregional metastatic disease or unexpected distant metastases [10–13]. Some previous reports have been issued on the relationship between pre-ablation serum Tg level and RxWBS patterns [10, 11].

However, few studies have been conducted to determine how remnant thyroid tissues, visualized by RxWBS, affect serum Tg changes by RAI therapy. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between iodine uptake patterns and serum Tg changes after RAI therapy.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Initially, we investigated all patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) treated with high dose (> 1.11 GBq) ¹³¹I at our institution between April 2013 and August 2015. Patients that underwent total thyroidectomy (TT) with dissection of cervical lymph nodes and had received initial RAI therapy were included. Patients that met any of the following criteria were excluded: (a) high probability of the remaining regional or distant metastasis based on pre-ablation or post-ablation studies, (b) serum anti-Tg antibody (TgAb) ≥ 60 IU/mL, (c) negative iodine uptake of the anterior neck on RxWBS, or (d) undetectable serum Tg before and after RAI therapy. Finally, 250 patients were enrolled in this study. This retrospective study has been approved by our institutional review board and the need for written informed consent was waived.

Radioactive Iodine Ablation Therapy and Serum Tg Measurement

For RAI therapy, all patients were prepared by thyroid hormone withdrawal for 4 weeks: levothyroxine was withdrawn for 4 weeks, with supplementary tri-io­dothyronine for the first 2 weeks of this preparation period. Patients received a low iodine diet (LID) for 2 weeks prior to RAI therapy in accord with institutional practice. On the first day of admission, serum Tg, TgAb, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels were measured before ¹³¹I administration. Serum TSH level was 30 μIU/mL or higher prior to ¹³¹I administration in all subjects. Dosages of ¹³¹I were determined in accord with institutional guidelines and ranged from 3.70 to 6.66 GBq. RxWBS was performed 7 days after RAI therapy and on the same day, serum Tg, TgAb, and TSH levels were remeasured to assess changes after RAI therapy.

Serum Tg levels were measured using a radioimmunoassay kit (Tg-pluS RIA, BRAHMS GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany) with a lower detection limit of 0.15 ng/mL. Serum TgAb levels were also measured using a radioimmunoassay kit (anti-Tgn RIA, BRAHMS GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany) with a lower detection limit of 20 U/mL. Serum TSH levels were measured using TSH-CTK-3 immunoradiometric assay (DiaSorin SpA, Saluggia, Italy) with a lower detection limit of 0.07 mIU/L.

Study Design

Patients were allocated to one of two groups according to the presence of midline uptake above the thyroidectomy bed on RxWBS, that is, patients without midline uptake above the thyroidectomy bed were allocated to group 1, and those with midline uptake above the thyroidectomy bed were allocated to group 2 (Fig. 1). Patients with ambiguous RxWBS findings that could not be assigned to a group, such as patients with a prominent star artifact on RxWBS, were excluded. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians reviewed RxWBS images and classified uptake patterns and excluded inappropriate scans. Clinical and pathological variables, including age, gender, tumor and lymph node stages, ¹³¹I dosage, and pre- and post-ablation level of serum Tg, TgAb, and TSH, were compared. In addition, Tg ratios (defined as ratio of pre-ablation Tg to post-ablation Tg) were also compared to assess degrees of serum Tg change. Tumors and lymph node metastases were classified using the classification system of the International Union Against Cancer and the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging manual.

Fig. 1.

Classification of the 250 study subjects by uptake pattern on post-ablation whole body scan. a If iodine uptake was observed only in the thyroidectomy bed, patients were assigned to group 1 (negative midline uptake). b On the other hand, if localized iodine uptake was observed in the central area above the thyroidectomy bed (arrowed), patients were assigned to group 2 (positive midline uptake)

Statistical Analysis

Univariate analysis was performed prior to multivariate analysis using chi-square for categorical variables and Student’s t-test for continuous variables, and this was followed by multivariate analysis. Initially multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify multiple collinearity among clinical variables and this was followed by multiple logistic regression analysis to identify variables that showed significant intergroup differences. Multiple logistic regression analysis included all variables with a P value less than 0.25 by univariate analysis. Results are presented as means ± standard deviations. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and the analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0 for Windows® (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Patient Characteristics

A total of 250 patients were enrolled; patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The frequency of the micropapillary carcinoma was more than 50 %. Solitary tumors were more common than multifocal tumors (53.2 vs. 46.8 %), and unilateral tumors were more common than bilateral tumors (67.2 vs. 32.8 %). Fewer patients had extrathyroidal extension (43.2 vs. 56.8 %). Regarding tumor (T) and lymph node (N) staging, T1 and N1a diseases were the most common (55.6 and 74.8 %, respectively). The mean time from surgery to RAI therapy was 101.97 days. Doses of 3.70 GBq ¹³¹I were administered to 138 patients, 5.55 GBq to 18 patients, and 6.66 GBq to 94 patients. Patients with midline uptake on RxWBS were more common than patients without midline uptake (59.6 vs. 40.4 %).

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Parameters	No. of patients
Age (years)
Mean (range)	47.83 ± 11.93 (21–79)
Male/female	71 (28.4 %)/179 (71.6 %)
Diameter of the largest tumor (mm)
Mean (range)	11.1 (2.0–70.0)
< 10/ ≥10	127 (50.8 %)/123 (49.2 %)
Presence of ETE
No ETE/microscopic ETE/gross ETE	142 (56.8 %)/50 (20.0 %)/58 (23.2 %)
Multiplicity
Solitary/multiple	133 (53.2 %)/117 (46.8 %)
Number of tumors (range)	1.86 ± 1.38 (1–12)
Bilaterality
Unilateral/bilateral	168 (67.2 %)/82 (32.8 %)
T stage
T1	139 (55.6 %)
T2	4 (1.6 %)
T3	81 (32.4 %)
T4	26 (10.4 %)
N stage
N0	29 (11.6 %)
N1a	187 (74.8 %)
N1b	34 (13.6 %)
Interval between operation and RAI therapy (days)
Mean (range)	101.97 ± 17.34 (59–175)
Dose of administered 131I (GBq)
3.70	138 (55.2 %)
5.55	18 (7.2 %)
6.66	94 (37.6 %)
Presence of midline uptake on RxWBS negative/positive	101 (40.4 %)/149 (59.6 %)

ETE extrathyroidal extension, RxWBS post-ablation ¹³¹I whole body scan

Comparison of Pre-ablation Characteristics in the Two Groups

Table 2 shows the results of univariate and multivariate analysis of clinical factors according to RxWBS pattern. One hundred and one patients were included in group 1 (negative midline uptake), and 149 patients in group 2 (positive midline uptake). No significant difference was found between the two groups, with respect to age, gender, T, N staging, tumor multiplicity or bilaterality, tumor size, time from operation to RAI therapy or dose of ¹³¹I. Pre-ablation laboratory values on the day of RAI therapy, including Tg, TgAb, and TSH, were not significantly different.

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the factors between groups by the pattern of postablation whole body scan

Variables	Negative midline uptake (n = 101)	Positive midline uptake (n = 149)	Univariate	Multivariate
			P value	P value	OR (95 % CI)
Age (years)	47.02 ± 12.55	48.38 ± 11.51	0.377
Gender
Female	78 (77.2 %)	101 (67.8 %)
Male	23 (22.8 %)	32.2 (32.2 %)	0.117	0.166
T stage
T1	58 (57.4 %)	81 (54.4 %)
T2	2 (2.0 %)	2 (1.3 %)
T3	30 (29.7 %)	51 (34.2 %)
T4	11 (10.9 %)	15 (10.1 %)	0.879
Multiplicity
Solitary	54 (53.5 %)	79 (53.0 %)
Multiple	47 (46.5 %)	70 (47.0 %)	1.000
Bilaterality
Unilateral	71 (70.3 %)	97 (65.1 %)
Bilateral	30 (29.7 %)	52 (34.9 %)	0.413
N stage
N0	7 (6.9 %)	22 (14.8 %)
N1a	76 (75.2 %)	111 (74.5 %)
N1b	18 (17.8 %)	16 (10.7 %)	0.067	0.165
Tumor size (mm)
< 10	47 (46.5 %)	80 (53.7 %)
≥ 10	54 (53.5 %)	69 (46.3 %)	0.303
Dose of administered 131I (GBq)
3.70	60 (59.4 %)	78 (52.3 %)
5.55	4 (4.0 %)	14 (9.4 %)
6.66	37 (36.6 %)	57 (38.3 %)	0.217	0.804
Interval between operation and RAI therapy (days)	102.63 ± 18.02	101.52 ± 16.91	0.620
Pre-ablation Tg (ng/mL)*	1.71 ± 2.38	1.98 ± 2.20	0.363
Pre-ablation TgAb (U/ml)*	26.24 ± 10.65	25.61 ± 10.33	0.642
Pre-ablation TSH (μIU/ml)*	81.00 ± 30.12	78.86 ± 29.88	0.581
Post-ablation Tg (ng/mL)†	8.12 ± 11.05	34.12 ± 54.31	< 0.001	< 0.001	1.060 (1.028–1.092)
Post-ablation TgAb (U/ml)†	27.06 ± 12.21	25.05 ± 10.95	0.175	0.107
Post-ablation TSH (μIU/ml)†	38.08 ± 30.84	38.06 ± 31.07	0.996
Tg ratio‡	7.81 ± 8.98	20.01 ± 19.84	< 0.001	0.001	1.059 (1.023–1.096)

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, Tg thyroglobulin, TgAb anti-thyroglobulin antibody, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone

*Pre-ablation Tg, TgAb, and TSH were measured just before I-131 ablation therapy

†Post-ablation Tg, TgAb, and TSH were measured 7 days after oral administration of I-131

‡Tg ratio was defined as ‘post-ablation Tg devided by pre-ablation Tg’

Comparison of Post-ablation Characteristics

In all 250 study subjects, no significant pre- to post-ablation change was observed in serum TgAb (25.86 ± 10.44 U/mL vs. 25.86 ± 11.49 U/mL), while serum TSH decreased from 79.73 ± 29.94 μIU/mL to 38.07 ± 30.92 μIU/mL. And no significant difference was found in the serum level of post-ablation TgAb and TSH between the two groups, in common with the serum level of the pre-ablation TgAb and TSH (Table 2).

Serum Tg increased from 1.86 ± 2.28 ng/mL to 23.62 ± 44.34 ng/mL after RAI therapy, in all 250 study subjects. In group 1, serum Tg level increased about 5-fold after RAI therapy (1.71 ± 2.38 ng/mL to 8.12 ± 11.05 ng/mL), whereas in group 2, it increased by more than 17-fold after RAI therapy (1.98 ± 2.20 ng/mL to 34.12 ± 54.31 ng/mL) (Fig. 2). Although pre-ablation serum Tg level was not significantly different between the two groups, post-ablation serum Tg level was significantly higher in group 2 (8.12 ± 11.05 ng/mL vs. 34.12 ± 54.31 ng/mL, P < 0.001). In addition, Tg ratios were significantly different between the two groups (7.81 ± 8.98 vs. 20.01 ± 19.84 (group 1 vs. group 2, respectively; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3). To exclude the effect of administered RAI on the serum Tg assay, we randomly selected 50 post-ablation serum samples for Tg assay and rechecked Tg values 1 to 2 months after initial assays, and found no significant difference (5.50 ± 13.74 ng/mL vs. 5.74 ± 14.47 ng/mL, P = 0.172 by paired T-test). This result is consistent with that of a recent study [14].

Fig. 2.

Change of pre- and post-ablation serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level in each group. a In group 1, serum Tg level increased about 5-fold after RAI therapy (1.71 ± 2.38 ng/mL to 8.12 ± 11.05 ng/mL). b On the other hand, it increased by more than 17-fold after RAI therapy in group 2 (1.98 ± 2.20 ng/mL to 34.12 ± 54.31 ng/mL)

Fig. 3.

Comparison of post-ablation serum thyroglobulin (Tg) levels and Tg ratios according to iodine uptake pattern. (a–b). Both post-ablation serum thyroglobulin level and Tg ratio were significantly higher in group 2 (positive midline uptake) than those in group 1 (negative midline uptake)

No significant collinearity was found among clinical variables by multiple linear regression analysis, even among pre-ablation Tg, post-ablation Tg, and Tg ratio (variance inflation factors were 1.397, 1.849, and 1.588, respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using all variables with a P value less than 0.25 by univariate analysis. Post-ablation Tg (OR = 1.060, 95 % CI = 1.028–1.092, P < 0.001) and Tg ratio (OR = 1.059, 95 % CI = 1.023–1.096, P = 0.001) continued to maintain significance and no other variable was found to be significantly different in the two study groups.

Figure 4 shows representative cases. In the patient without midline uptake, no change in serum Tg was observed after RAI therapy (both 0.3 ng/mL). However, in the patient with midline uptake, post-ablation serum Tg (18.1 ng/ml) and Tg ratio (45.25) were considerably higher than those of the patient without midline uptake, although pre-ablation serum Tg level was almost the same (0.4 ng/ml).

Fig. 4.

Post-ablation whole body scans of one patient from each group. No significant difference was evident with respect to pathologic staging (T1 N1a Mx) or administered ¹³¹I dose (3.70 GBq). a In the patient without midline uptake, no significant pre- to post-ablation change in serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level was observed (0.3 ng/mL and Tg ratio 1.00). b However, in the patient with midline uptake, although pre-ablation Tg was almost the same (0.4 ng/mL) as in the patient without midline uptake, post-ablation serum Tg was significantly elevated to 18.1 ng/mL and Tg ratio was 45.25

Discussion

Several studies have addressed alterations in biochemical markers after external irradiation of the thyroid [15–18]. Nishiyama et al. [15] reported that serum Tg and thyroid hormone levels were elevated due to cellular damage after incidental external irradiation to the thyroid. Increased cellular membrane permeability and apoptosis after radiation exposure have been suggested to be the most important mechanisms responsible for those phenomena [16, 17]. In view of those reports, it appears that serum Tg elevation is related to cellular damage after RAI therapy, and that post-ablation serum Tg level reflects the magnitude of the cellular damage caused by RAI therapy. Notably, the stimulating effect of TSH could be ruled out as a cause of serum Tg elevation because post-ablation serum TSH levels were significantly lower than pre-ablation serum TSH levels (79.73 ± 29.94 μIU/ml vs. 38.07 ± 30.92 μIU/ml, P < 0.001).

Bernier et al. [8] investigated the prognostic value of an increase in serum Tg in patients with DTC. Tg ratios were calculated by dividing post-ablation Tg (measured 5 days after RAI therapy) by pre-ablation Tg and compared with pre-ablation serum Tg levels. A higher Tg ratio (>20) was related to ablation success despite a higher pre-ablation Tg level (≥5 ng/ml). Kim et al. [7] also compared pre-ablation stimulated Tg levels with Tg ratios and the result was similar with that of Bernier et al. [8].

Presumably, post-ablation Tg level and Tg ratio were found to be potential prognostic factors because they conceptually reflect therapeutic responsiveness to RAI, whereas pre-ablation Tg does not. However, previous studies failed to demonstrate that Tg ratio had a greater clinical impact than pre-ablation stimulated Tg. There could be several reasons why the prognostic ability of Tg ratio is limited and it is crucial to evaluate which factors affect post-ablation Tg level or Tg ratio, other than cellular damage.

Jung et al. [19] reported that ablation failure was related to a high pre-ablation serum Tg level and positive neck uptake on a Tc-99m pertechnetate salivary scan, which suggests a large amount of remaining thyroid tissue after surgery. Interestingly, all cases showing positive uptake on a salivary scan were localized in the central area above the thyroidectomy bed. Lee et al. [20] concluded midline uptake above the thyroidectomy bed (visualized by RxWBS) should be considered as a thyroglossal duct remnant (TGDR); furthermore, midline uptakes were still observed on follow-up diagnostic iodine scan in 15 % of patients with midline uptake on RxWBS.

Taken together, positive midline uptake on RxWBS could suggest a large amount of remnant thyroid tissues, such as TGDR [20, 21], and post-ablation serum Tg might be affected by midline uptake regarded as TGDR. However, remnant burden alone is not sufficient to explain serum Tg elevation in patients with midline uptake. First of all, there was no significant difference of baseline serum Tg between the two groups. Some studies suggest that pre-ablation Tg is related with remnant burden [22], although serum Tg is not actively released into blood stream in proportion to cellular burden and has limitation in estimation of small remnant burden. In addition, there is no known relationship between iodine uptake and remnant burden, although similar iodine uptake intensity suggested similar iodine accumulation [23]. According to Fig. 4, both of the patients have uptake of ¹³¹I on RxWBS with similar intensity but the location of uptake is different: patients on the left side with uptake in the thyroidectomy bed and patients on the right side with uptakes in the thyroidectomy bed and midline above thyroidectomy bed. Although intensity of ¹³¹I uptake on RxWBS and baseline serum Tg were similar, patients with midline uptake demonstrated higher Tg ratio. Lastly, our study showed wide ranges of post-ablation serum Tg levels (0.2–378.00 ng/mL) and of Tg ratios (1.00–155.00) even in patients with midline uptake on RxWBS. This wide range of distribution might be a result of individual differences in the amount of remnant thyroid tissue or an unknown characteristic of TGDR. However, at least, it is presumable that serum Tg elevation after RAI therapy might be affected not only by remnant burden but also by other factors such as RAI sensitivities of remnant tissues or TGDR. Accordingly, this study provides new insight for the meaning of Tg elevation after RAI therapy, because serum Tg levels could be elevated differentially according to RxWBS uptake patterns. Further investigations are needed to elucidate other possible mechanisms.

It could be somewhat controversial to regard all midline uptakes in group 2 as TGDR, because pathologic and radiologic investigations were not performed in all patients. Actually, midline uptake pattern is a somewhat unique imaging finding, compared with other remnant uptake in thyroidectomy bed and that might be the reason why previous studies have considered those uptakes as TGDR without pathological diagnosis. On the other hand, prevalence of midline uptake regarded as TGDR in our study is much higher than that in other studies [24–28]. Average prevalence is approximately 7 % [24–26] but reported prevalence has quite a wide range; up to 41.3 % [27]. And TGDR indicates quite a wide range of pathologic entities, from scanty ectopic thyroid tissue along the suspected route of the thyroglossal tract, to ectopic thyroid tissue with complete thyroglossal tract [28]. Iodine scan is usually very sensitive to detect small remnant tissues or TGDR, which could affect the prevalence of midline uptake regarded as TGDR. In addition, cases included in this study may not reflect all of the population because we excluded some cases based on exclusion criteria.

This study has several limitations. First, we could not explore the clinical implications of the relationship between midline uptake and an elevated serum Tg level, due to insufficient follow-up duration. Instead, we tried to focus on the meaning of a serum Tg level change after RAI therapy by considering RxWBS uptake patterns. Second, RxWBS uptake patterns were determined mainly by using planar images because single photon emission computerized tomography/computerized tomography was performed in some of the patients. Moreover, pathologic investigations on the nature of midline uptake were not performed in those patients. Although two experienced nuclear medicine physicians reviewed RxWBS images and classified uptake patterns, further investigations are necessary to characterize midline uptake.

Conclusion

Serum Tg levels after RAI therapy were found to be significantly elevated in patients with midline uptake on RxWBS. Therefore, midline uptake is believed to be a major cause of serum Tg elevation after RAI therapy. Our results may offer a means to further understand how RAI affects remnant thyroid tissue, and suggests serum Tg elevation might be a precise surrogate marker of early therapeutic responsiveness to RAI by considering uptake patterns on RxWBS. Further investigations are needed to elucidate the implications (e.g., ablation success) of the relationship between midline uptake and an elevated serum Tg level.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Geum-Cheol Jeong, Minchul Song, Hee Jeong Park, Jung-Joon Min, Hee-Seung Bom, Ki Seong Park, Sang-Geon Cho, Sae-Ryung Kang, Jahae Kim, Ho-Chun Song and Seong Young Kwon have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethics Statement

The protocol of this study was approved by the ethics committee in our hospital, and the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Ethics committee waived the need to obtain informed consent.

The manuscript has not been published before or is not under consideration for publication anywhere else and has been approved by all co-authors.