Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Radiat Isot. 2016 Nov 4;119:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.10.015

A Radium-223 Microgenerator from Cyclotron-Produced Trace Actinium-227

Diane S Abou a, Juile Pickett a, John E Mattson b, Daniel L J Thorek a,c,*
PMCID: PMC5136344  NIHMSID: NIHMS828961  PMID: 27835737

Abstract

The alpha particle emitter Radium-223 dichloride (223RaCl2) has recently been approved for treatment of late-stage bone metastatic prostate cancer. There is considerable interest in studying this new agent outside of the clinical setting, however the supply of 223Ra is limited and expensive. We have engineered a 223Ra microgenerator using traces of 227Ac previously generated from cyclotron-produced 225Ac. Radiochemically pure 223RaCl2 was made, characterized, evaluated in vivo, and the source was recovered in high yield for regeneration of the microgenerator.

Keywords: 227Ac, 227Th, 223Ra, microgenerator, purification

Introduction

Carcinoma of the prostate is diagnosed in one in seven men (Siegel et al., 2014). When detected early, treatment options including surgery and external beam radiotherapy are highly effective. However, when the disease recurs or if diagnosed after metastasis, there is no definitive treatment. Prostate cancer has a strong tropism for colonizing the skeleton, and bone metastases occur in up to 90% of patients with castrate resistant disease (Ottewell et al., 2014). Recently, advances have led to the approval of alpha-particle radiopharmaceutical therapy Radium-223 Dichloride (223RaCl2) for treatment of osseous prostate cancer metastases. This bone-seeking radionuclide delivers potent cytotoxic alpha-particles to bone metastasis sites (Bruland et al., 2006; Henriksen et al., 2002) improving overall median survival of patients by nearly 4 months (Parker et al., 2013).

There are several routes of 223Ra procurement. Historically, first described by Pierre and Marie Curie in the 1900’s, radium purification from pitchblende ore containing fissile uranium yielded several milligrams per ton of material (Adloff, 1999). Currently, clinical and commercial production of 223RaCl2 (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals) involves 227Ac and 227Th isolation from a 231Pa source (half-life of 3.28×104 y) (Larsen et al., 2003). Access to this material is limited, costly and the long half-life of the parent makes use prohibitive. Alternatively, legacy sources of 227Ac exist, and innovative approaches have been leveraged to convert this material to medical and research grade 223Ra and 227Th (Soderquist et al., 2012).

Radiochemical separation of GBqs of 223Ra starting from sources of ultra-pure 227Ac and 227Th has previously been described (Mokhodoeva et al., 2015; Soderquist et al., 2012). Briefly, this purification utilized ionic exchange resins to separate 227Ac and 227Th from 223Ra-nitrate complexes based on charge discrepancies (Boll et al., 2005). Following 223Ra elution, the parent 227Ac and 227Th radionuclides may be resorbed on a new column for repeated purification. The decay chain for 227Ac isotopes is shown in Figure 1A as well as that for 225Ac.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

A) Decay chains of 227Ac and 225Ac: 227Ac is predominantly a beta-emitter decaying to 227Th. 227Th produces a total of 5 alpha particles to the stable 207Pb. 223Ra is the first daughter of 227Th, and the desired product of the purification. The initial source contains residual amounts of 225Ac decaying into 4 alpha-emitting daughters including 213Bi detected in the recovered acid wash; B) Anion-exchange column (Dowex 1×8 resin) was utilized to purify the source of 227Ac and 227Th using a mix of HNO3 and methanol. 223Ra was purified as nitrates, 223Ra solution was evaporated until dryness and resuspended in sodium citrate (0.03 M) – saline (150 mM) solution for in vivo experiments. Ultimately, the residual of column radioactivity was washed off using 0.5 M HNO3 to recover 227Ac and 227Th.

More recently, research efforts have been undertaken by the US Department of Energy to achieve cyclotron-production of 225Ac using high-energy proton irradiation of natural thorium targets (Radchenko et al., 2015a; Radchenko et al., 2015b; Weidner et al., 2012). However, 227Ac contamination is a side-product of this irradiation (approximately ≈0.3%). In this work, we have recycled the 227Ac by-product from the decayed source of 225Ac to generate 223Ra in high purity. Creation of a miniaturized production scale 223Ra generator has been accomplished utilizing traces of 227Ac (kBq). This source of 227Ac has generated an indefinite supply of 223Ra in amounts needed for preclinical studies, while recovering parent radionuclides 227Ac and 227Th in high yield.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals, radioisotope supplies, generator assembling and recollection

All reagents and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used directly, unless otherwise noted. Cyclotron-produced 225Ac-nitrate was supplied by the Department of Energy. The radioactive material was received dry, containing 296 MBq of 225Ac-nitrates and approximately 888 kBq of 227Ac-nitrates. This material was set-aside for over 10 half-lives of 225Ac, allowing for 225Ac to decay away. Following 225Ac decay, the remaining radioactive material is composed mostly of 227Ac and its daughters. This material was then dissolved in 0.5–1 mL of CH3OH (80%) and 0.4 M HNO3 (20%). All aqueous-based solutions were made from ultra-pure metal-free water purified with Chelex 100 resin (BioRad).

For purification, a conditioned strong base, type 1, anion exchange resin, Dowex 1×8 (100–200 mesh) was used. Briefly, 25 g of resin was hydrated and decanted at least 3 times to eliminate fine particulates. The gel was then conditioned with basic (1 M NaOH) and acid (0.05 M HCl/1 M NaCl) washes. Finally, the stock of processed resin was stored at 4 °C in 50 mL 20% aqueous ethanol until used.

The microgenerator column was formed using 2 mL of the anion exchange resin solution that was settled in an empty poly-prep chromatographic column equipped with a frit disk (porous 30 µm polyethylene support, BioRad). The column was then washed with at least 3 column volumes of water and 3 column volumes of CH3OH (80%), 0.4 M HNO3.

For 223Ra purification, (Figure 1B) the radioactive source was adsorbed onto the column resin. 223Ra was eluted with CH3OH (80%)/0.4 M HNO3 in 0.5 mL increments. The elution was conducted up to complete exhaustion of radioactivity (determined by measuring each of the eluted fractions using a dose calibrator). Each fraction was later analyzed using well-counter and gamma spectroscopy (shown in Figure 2A).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

A) Radioactive elution profile of 223Ra-microgenerator fractions was assessed using a NaI well-counter acquiring within the spectral region 240–300 keV. B) The time-dependence γ-counts for 223Ra sample eluted at 8.5 mL (black dots) is plotted with the fit of the complete decay chain (blue) and the expected behavior for pure 223Ra (red). C) The 223Ra eluted fractions (8–14.5 mL) were γ-counted over a period of 28 days, the plots were fit to a decay model of the decay chain and detector response to determine the isotopic content for each fraction (Table 1).

Following 223Ra purification, 227Ac and 227Th parents were washed off the column with 3–6 column volumes of 0.5 M HNO3. (Figure 1B). To limit 227Th and 227Ac breakthrough, a new column was prepared for each 223Ra production.

For in vivo administration, 223Ra was evaporated at 90°C, using a hot plate, twice till dryness to eliminate nitric acid. The dry vial was suspended in saline/0.03 M sodium citrate for conversion to 223RaCl2. The pH was verified to be 7.

Radioisotopic evaluation of microgenerator and products

Dose Calibration

The source, eluted fractions and column were measured using a NaI dose calibrator (CRC-127R; Capintec Inc) for radioactive recovery determination. An empirically derived calibrator setting of #277 was used to measure 223Ra, as described previously (Abou et al., 2016). Briefly, the calibrator parameter was determined by selecting a value confirming the decay-corrected National Institute of Standards and Technology standard calibrated dose of a commercial 223RaCl2 source (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals) (Bergeron et al., 2010).

Well-Counting

An automated NaI gamma counter (Wizard2, Perkin Elmer) was used to determine fraction radioactivity. The γ-counting energy window was set between 240 and 300 keV for a duration of 600 seconds. The main photopeak detected at 270 keV was provided by the emissions of 223Ra (269 keV; 13.7%) and 219Rn (271 keV; 10.8%). The time dependence of the count-rate for this specific region of interest has been modeled and fit to determine the fraction of 227Ac and 227Th relative to 223Ra in the purified fractions.

Multi Channel Analyzer (MCA)

Source and fraction samples were analyzed using Ace-2K (EG&G Ortec) connected to a detector Bicron 2 inch by 2 in well-counter acquired for 4 minutes. Spectra were read using Maestro 32 software.

Gamma Spectroscopy

Spectroscopic analysis of eluted fractions was carried out using a calibrated battery powered Stirling-cycle cooled portable high purity germanium (HPGe) spectrometer (Detective-EX-100, Ortec). Column fractions in eppendorf tubes were placed on a platform at distances of between 2 and 16 cm from the detector and counted for approximately 300 seconds. Spectra were initially analyzed in the Maestro software package (Ortec). A background spectra (in the absence of a radioactive sample) was also acquired for 360 sec. Using the collected data, the known detector efficiency values and the γ-ray emission probabilities (from the National Nuclear Data Center) we determined the isotopic content of purified fractions, acidic washes and the column residual. The relative efficiency of our HPGe detector was previously determined at a number of fixed energies using the γ-rays of 152Eu and 133Ba measured at fixed distances. The detector efficiencies were determined using a linear interpolation from the previously determined efficiencies.

Animal Experimentation

All mouse experimentation was in accordance with institutional animal welfare protocols at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and conformed with National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (2011). Skeletally mature male C57Bl/6 mice (>14 weeks) (n=5 per group) received a 150 µL retro-orbital dose of 223RaCl2 (10 kBq) diluted in saline with 0.03 M sodium citrate from either remnant activity from a clinical dose (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals) or as purified from the microgenerator. After 24 h, animals were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation and cervical dislocation followed by prompt dissection. Excised tissues were weighed, and radioactivity was assessed by γ-counting (Wizard2, as above). Count data were background and decay-corrected to determine the tissue uptake as a percentage injected activity (%IA) to the time of injection.

Statistical Analysis and data modeling

Figures were prepared in Illustrator (Adobe) and Prism (Graphpad). Statistical significance was defined using the unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-test. Differences at the 95% confidence level (P<0.05) were considered to be statistically significant.

The fitting of half-life decay was conducted using Wavemetrics Igor Pro. We used a weighted non-linear Levenberg-Marquadt fitting procedure to fit the measured count-rate data to the coupled differential equations listed in Equations 1S (representing the decay chain in Figure 1A), and the detector response shown in Equation 1. In this process the unknown variables were limited to the amounts of 227Ac, 227Th, 223Fr and 223Ra present at time t=0.

CR(t)=jk=γROIεk(E)Ij,kλjNj(t) Equation 1:

Here the N’s are the number of atoms of each isotope at time, t, and the λ’s are the decay coefficients of each of the isotopes with half-life Tj1/2 where λj= Ln(2)/Tj1/2, Ij,k is the fraction of decays that emit gamma-rays with energy E and ε(E) is the detection efficiency at energy E. The set of differential equations (Equations 1S) may be simplified by considering that 223Ra and its daughters are all in equilibrium at the time of the measurement (>10 h post elution). Using this information, we can reduce the Equations 1S to the solution of only the top 4 coupled differential equations (with 227Ac, 227Th, 223Fr, 223Ra). The starting amount of each isotope was integrated using the differential equations (Equation 1S) from t=0 until the measurement time.

This allowed us to determine the number of atoms of each isotope at a given time, Nj(t). These values are then combined with Equation 1 to calculate the number of gamma-rays detected by the well counter and then used to fit this to the data of sample decay over 28 days (Figure 2B and 2C). We note that the measured data at t=0 and t=15 days was not included in this fit. At t=0, the equilibrium was not yet reached with the daughters (of 223Ra). At t=15 days, the data are consistently low for all measured samples. The plot and fit to the data for the eluted fraction 8.5 mL is shown in Figure 2B, and has been repeated for all other fractions with the results summarized in Table1 and plotted in Figure 2C. We point out that because the purified elutions are mostly 223Ra and the gamma-rays emitted by the samples are mostly from 223Ra (and its daughter 219Rn) one can simplify Equation 1 further and the detector efficiency is not needed in order to determine the relative activities of 227Ac, 227Th and 223Ra (plus daughters). Since the absolute detector efficiency was not determined in this study we confine our analysis of this time series data to determine the relative ratios of activities (at time t=0). Fortunately because of the narrow energy region of the counting and the fact that counts are dominated by the emissions from the gamma-rays of 223Ra and 219Rn at 269 and 271 keV respectively, that are very close in energy we can assume the detector efficiency is the same for these emissions (to within a few percent error). With these assumptions we can model the decay data to determine the relative isotopic content of the eluted fractions to within at best a few percent (consistent with our lack of detailed information on the detector efficiency).

Table 1.

Isotopic ratios at time t=0 extracted from the time dependent γ-count measurements for each purified 223Ra fraction.

Eluted Volume
(mL)
Ratio
(227Th/223Ra)%
Ratio
(227Ac/223Ra)%
8 1.8±0.7 0±0.6
8.5 1.6±0.7 0±0.6
9 1.5±0.6 0.7±0.4
9.5 1.5±0.7 0±0.6
10 2.0±0.2 0±0.5
10.5 1.1±0.7 0±0.7
12.5 0.98±0.2 0±1.0
13.5 1.2±0.8 0±0.7
14.5 0.95±0.6 0±0.6

HPGe measurements were conducted on the purified 223Ra fraction (8.5mL), the column wash off, the column residual 23 days post-elution and a background with no sources present. These measured spectra, and example spectra of 227Ac, 227Th, 223Fr, and 223Ra (with its daughters) are displayed in Figure 3A–3F, where example spectra were generated calculated using GADRAS (Mitchell, 1992) and previously determined detector response models. In these Figures the live-time corrected background has been subtracted from the measurement.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

A) Full view γ-ray spectra HPGe of purified 223Ra material produced from the microgenerator (fraction eluted at 8.5 mL) (black triangles). The relative components of the spectrum are 223Ra and daughters (blue), 227Th (plain black), 225Ac (dotted blue), 223Fr (green) and 227Ac (red). B) Fit of γ-ray 223Ra samples in the region from 220 to 280 keV. Measurement fit (red) and radioisotopes models (223Ra, 227Th, 223Fr/227Ac) are presented. The components, detector and emission efficiency, used to fit the isotopic models are shown Table 2. C) Full view γ-ray spectrum of the acid wash (black triangles). The relative components of the spectrum are 223Ra and daughters (blue), 227Th (black), 225Ac (dotted), 223Fr (green) and of 227Ac (red). The sample presents traces of 213Bi, daughter of 225Ac. This is a strong indication of the parent radioisotopes elution and recovery of 227Ac and 227Th. D) Fit of γ-ray acid wash (red) in the region from 220 to 280 keV, 227Th and 223Ra models are matching the γ-ray measurements of the column effluent (round plots). E) Full view γ-ray spectrum of the column residual (black triangles). The relative components of the spectrum are 223Ra and daughters (blue), 227Th (black plain), 225Ac (dotted blue), 223Fr (green) and 227Ac (red). The column shows an apparent reduction of 225Ac. This is a strong indication that the 225Ac was removed by acid wash, however 227Th remains partially adsorbed on the resin. F) Fit of γ-ray column residual (red) in the region from 220 to 280 keV, 227Th (dash) and 223Ra (blue) models are matching the γ-ray measurements of the column effluent (round plots). It shows that both 223Ra and 227Th residual remains on the column after purification and wash off.

A detailed estimation of the isotopic contents were calculated based on fitting the peaks using a Gaussian model of the γ-ray peaks in the narrow region 220–280 KeV of the HPGe spectra. The equation used to fit this region is shown in Equation 2. The efficiencies, emission intensity and γ-ray energies used in the model are listed in Table 2. For Equation 2 below, r is the distance from the source to the detector; A is the cross-sectional area of the detector; ε(E) is the intrinsic efficiency of the detector at the energy of the emitted γ-ray; 227Th, 223Fr, and 223Ra are respective activities, I is the relative intensity of the emitted γ-ray for that decay and the sums of i, j and k are over the γ-rays emitted by the isotopes in the region (250–400 keV), finally σ is the Gaussian width of the peak (1.82keV). Also included are the terms for a linear background, where S is the slope and Y0 the y offset. It should be noted that the peaks widths are in principle dependent upon the gamma-ray energy as well. However over this narrow spectral region these peaks are well represented by a constant width, thereby simplifying the equations.

CR=(Aσ2π4πr2){Ra223iεiIie((EiE)2σ2)+Th227jεjIje((EjE)2σ2)+Fr223kεkIke((EkE)2σ2)}+ES+Y0 Equation 2:

Table 2.

Photon emissions associated with HPGe detector efficiency and emission intensity ranging between 220–280 keV.

Energy (keV) Detector Efficiency Emission Intensity (%)
223Ra+ daughters
269.46 49.73 13.7
271.23 49.5 10.8
227Th
235.96 54.26 12.9
250.27 52.2 0.45
252.5 51.92 0.11
254.63 51.64 0.7
256.23 51.43 7
262.87 50.4 0.11
272.91 49.0 0.5
223Fr
234.74 54.4 3.0

In this region of interest only γ-rays from 227Th, 223Ra and 223Fr have significant emission probabilities, and are included in Equation 2.

Results

Actinium and thorium belong to the actinide metals group, while radium is an alkaline earth metal. As such, they are characterized by different ionic charges: +3; +4 and +2 respectively. These charge discrepancies are beneficial to the separation and purification of each element. When associated to nitrates, 227Ac, 227Th and 223Ra form various negatively charged species. Utilizing charge affinity chromatography, each metal can be separated. When dissolved in a mixture of HNO3 <0.5 M/Methanol >70% and adsorbed on strong anion exchange resin, the following radioisotopic retention affinity has been reported: 227Th-nitrates > 227Ac-nitrates > 223Ra-nitrates (Faris et al., 1964; Guseva et al., 2004). Here we performed chemical separation of 223Ra on the kBq scale from cyclotron-produced 227Ac (Figure 1B). Previous 223Ra purifications utilize this strategy to produce GBq of 223Ra starting from pure 227Ac source material (Mokhodoeva et al., 2015; Soderquist et al., 2012).

Sample quality control was assessed by physical and radiochemical evaluation, utilizing a dose calibrator, a well counter and a HPGe detector. The material was then compared with clinical grade 223RaCl2 supplied by the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine radiopharmacy to conduct an evaluation of the biological distribution in healthy living mice to confirm the high quality of the produced 223Ra.

The source, a mixture of 225Ac/227Ac/227Th/223Ra (740–925 kBq), was adsorbed onto the resin. The purification and acid wash off were conducted and checked for radioactive recovery immediately after collection using the dose calibrator. The radioactive recovery of all purified 223Ra fractions was estimated to be 71.3±5.7% (n=5) of the initial source deposited onto the column. We note this is roughly what is expected based on the dose-rates ratio of 223Ra (+daughters) to the original column activity. This is estimated to be 68.5% based on the data from the NNDC for these isotopes. The acidic wash HNO3 (0.5 M) was later conducted to recover 227Ac, 225Ac and 227Th (Figure 1B).

The purified 223Ra fractions (8–15 mL elution, Figure 2A) were measured using the well counter over a period of 28 days (Figure 2B). This data was then fit to the time dependent decay (Equation 1S) and the detector response (Equation 2). The results of this fitting are shown as the blue line in Figure 2C. For comparison, we show as the red line in Figure 2 the expected decay if the sample were pure 223Ra. This comparison clearly indicates that the observed decay data is more accurately described by the more complete decay model. The results of the fitting of the time series data to the more complete decay model for all the elutions are shown in Table 1. The isotopic content of purified fractions at time t=0 indicates that all eluted fractions (8–15 mL) show less than 1% of 227Ac and 227Th contaminant, by activity, demonstrating limited breakthrough of the parent isotopes.

In addition to half-life determination, γ-energy spectra were compared between purified samples, acid wash and column residual (Figures 3A–F). In the purified 223Ra fractions (Figure 3A, and 3B), primarily 223Ra was detected without any significant contaminant. In Figure 3B we show the result of fitting the Gaussian peaks to the narrow spectral region and determine that this sample is primarily 223Ra with less than 1% by activity of 227Th. This is consistent with the time dependence analysis.

In contrast, the acid wash presented a mix of isotopic content (as identified by their characteristic γ-ray lines) including 223Ra, 227Th, 223Fr and 225Ac (through its daughter 213Bi) (Figure 3C). Fitting the spectrum in the narrow region 220–280 keV to the Gaussian peak (Figure 3D) we estimated the isotopic ratio of 227Th/223Ra to be 41.6±2.5%. Additionally, the large 213Bi signal in Figure 3C, is indicative of 225Ac, strongly suggests 227Ac washed off from the column.

Similarly, the column residual presented a mix of isotopic content (as identified by their characteristic γ-ray lines) including 223Ra, 227Th and 223Fr as seen shown in Figure 3E. However, unlike Figure 3C, there is little evidence of 225Ac (through it daughter 213Bi), indicating that little 225Ac or 227Ac remains on the column. Fitting the spectrum in the narrow region 220–280 keV to the Gaussian peaks, as seen in Figure 3F, we estimated the isotopic ratio of 227Th/223Ra to be 702±8 %.

In order to verify the quality of the microgenerated material, we undertook biodistribution studies using the in-laboratory produced 223Ra and clinical grade 223RaCl2. We compared uptake in mice of the same age and same breed. For both groups, mice were sacrificed and organs harvested 24 h post-injection. No statistical difference of organ distribution was noted. As expected, the bulk of 223Ra was absorbed into bones and mineral elements, 2.5–5% of the initially administered activity as shown in Figure 4. Significant accumulation in cecum and spleen were observed as well with 2.5% and 0.5% respectively. These values correlate with previously reported small-animal studies using 223Ra (Abou et al., 2016).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Biodistribution: 223Ra localization in organs comparing clinically supplied and in laboratory generated material using C57Bl/6 mice (>14 weeks). The mice were sacrificed 24 h post-injection (p.i.). Following organs harvesting, tissue specimen were weighed and gamma counted to define percentage of injected activity.

Discussion

There are several advantages to alpha-particle radiotherapy. Radium-223 produces a total of 4 alpha-particles through its decay. When administered, the high linear-energy-transfer of these emissions results in the deposition of alpha particles within a vicinity of only several cell diameters. The short-range spares distant non-diseased surrounding tissue (Hobbs et al., 2012). The irradiation is also highly potent, causing irreversible DNA damage, fatal to the targeted cells (Wideroe, 1979). 223Ra is a mimetic of calcium, and as a result is a bone-seeker. The recently approved radiopharmaceutical 223RaCl2 (tradename Xofigo) is of considerable research interest due to its noted survival benefit and palliative effect provided to patients with bone-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (Parker et al., 2013). However, 223Ra and associated source materials such as 227Ac or 227Th are difficult to access for the sole purpose of preclinical research. For these reasons alternate 223Ra production approaches are needed to make this material widely available for laboratory investigation. In this work we describe a process to produce laboratory-scale quantities of 223Ra (kBqs) with high separation capacity of the radiometal mixture for repeatable use of the parent radionuclides 227Th and 227Ac.

Previously, methods for 223Ra production have been conducted at industrial scale (GBqs) using parent radionuclide sources that are not widely available. A recent advance in the cyclotron production of 225Ac includes a small amount of 227Ac side-product. To that end, we undertook the recycling of this perceived contaminant for 223Ra production. Using this radioisotopic waste, may reroute unwanted 227Ac from a long-term storage-hazard towards high radiopurity 223RaCl2 for research use. This approach is attractive to permanently supply the currently pursued radiopharmaceutical drug 223RaCl2.

Using a miniaturized purification system, our method resulted in the reliable production of high quality grade carrier-free 223Ra, with attractive yield and recovery of the parent isotopes. Five complete elution and column recovery cycles were conducted during the course of this study. We did not observe any signs of resin oxidation or damage and no noticeable microgenerator radiolysis was seen. This is likely due to the low radioactive content of our samples associated with a large chromatographic resin surface (<1000 kBq for 1 g of resin). Column conditioning was performed prior to each purification to limit particle desorption, yet the presence of 227Th or 227Ac-labeled mesh may not be excluded. Fortunately, negligible radioactive contaminants were detected in 223Ra samples, limiting the likelihood of this phenomenon.

Purity of in-laboratory produced 223Ra was confirmed by both physical and biological evaluations. In vivo examination of the produced 223Ra showed no significant difference in organ distribution as compared to the clinical grade sample. The radioactive decay fitting provided an overview of the sample quality. We estimate that no more than 1% (by activity) of either 227Th or 227Ac impurities at time t=0 is present in the purified 223Ra elutions. In addition the HPGe results indicate that 227Th and 227Ac were both retained by the column while purifying 223Ra. As a result, no apparent breakthrough occurred during the purification.

The HPGe results indicate that the column wash off was successfully conducted and contained 223Fr, 213Bi, 227Th and 223Ra. Detection of 213Bi revealed undecayed 225Ac, present in the wash off. Additionally, 225Ac detected in the column wash-off shows that actinium is desorbed upon acid wash of the column. The apparent concentration of 213Bi appears to be significantly reduced in the column residual. This is additional evidence of 227Ac desorption when washing off. In contrast, 227Th was identified and quantified in both wash off and column residual. However given the time between the acid wash and the HPGE measurements (~2 days), and the time between the 223Ra elutions and the acid wash (23 days); the 223Ra measured in the acid wash is consistent with the in-growth of 223Ra from the parents 227Th and 227Ac. The 227Th content in the acid wash appears greater than expected from the 227Ac in-growth and is suggestive of at least partial desorption of 227Th from the column. 227Th and 223Ra detected in the column residual are consistent with 227Th remaining on the column after acid rinse and consequently the 223Ra in growth. In summary, the HPGe measurements show that significant amount of 227Ac is recovered ensuring a long-term supply of 223Ra for research studies.

The utility of this work has been demonstrated through several convenient aspects: (1) 227Ac originally perceived as a waste from cyclotron-produced 225Ac source, has been converted into a pure alpha particle emitting radiopharmaceutical drug; (2) With the complete recovery of 227Ac, 223Ra microscale production is repeatable; (3) 227Th was separated from 227Ac, opening another perspective for alpha-particle emitter production.

Conclusion

We have constructed a 223Ra microgenerator using recycled 227Ac from a 225Ac cyclotron-produced source. kBqs of pure 223Ra-nitrate were consistently generated and further converted into a readily injectable 223RaCl2 for laboratory in vivo experiments. The parent radioisotopic source was recovered enabling repeated production. This opens the path for expanded pre-clinical investigation to better understand the distribution and radiobiological effects of 223RaCl2 therapy in the context of prostate and breast cancer.

Supplementary Material

Table 3.

The ratio of 227Th to 223Ra activities extracted from HPGe fit (t=15 days post-elution) for purified 223Ra purified elutions (500 µL), acid wash (1 mL) and column residual (full column).

Sample 227Th/223Ra(%)
223Ra (8.5ml fraction) 0.0 ±1
Acid wash 41.6± 2.5
Column residual 702±8

Highlights.

  • A 223Ra microgenerator was built using residual 227Ac from cyclotron-produced 225Ac.

  • Following 225Ac decay, the residual 227Ac was processed into pure 223Ra.

  • 227Ac and 227Th were recovered in high yield for a permanent supply of 223Ra.

  • Clinically supplied and generator-produced 223Ra have equivalent in vivo distribution.

  • Microdose column provides sufficient material for research use.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Mirzadeh, and the DOE isotope program for supplying the cyclotron-produced 225/227Ac source. We are grateful to Dr. Granlund (JHU) for his introduction to multichannel analysis. We thank Dr. Soderquist (DOE) and Dr. McDevitt (MSKCC) for their recommendations. This work was supported Steve Wynn Young Investigator Award from the Prostate Cancer Foundation; the Patrick C. Walsh Fund; the National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute R01-CA201035 (DLJT); Prostate Cancer SPORE P50CA058236 (DLJT); the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Junior Faculty Fund (DSA); and T32AR067708 (JP).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th. Washington (DC): 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abou DS, Ulmert D, Doucet M, Hobbs RF, Riddle RC, Thorek DL. Whole-Body and Microenvironmental Localization of Radium-223 in Naive and Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer Metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108 doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adloff JP. The laboratory notebooks of Pierre and Marie Curie and the discovery of polonium and radium. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics. 1999;49:15–28. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergeron DE, Zimmerman BE, Cessna JT. Development of secondary standards for 223Ra. Appl Radiat Isot. 2010;68:1367–1370. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.11.005. discussion 1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boll RA, Malkemus D, Mirzadeh S. Production of actinium-225 for alpha particle mediated radioimmunotherapy. Appl Radiat Isotopes. 2005;62:667–679. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruland OS, Nilsson S, Fisher DR, Larsen RH. High-linear energy transfer irradiation targeted to skeletal metastases by the alpha-emitter 223Ra: adjuvant or alternative to conventional modalities? Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6250s–6257s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Henriksen G, Breistol K, Bruland OS, Fodstad O, Larsen RH. Significant antitumor effect from bone-seeking, alpha-particle-emitting (223)Ra demonstrated in an experimental skeletal metastases model. Cancer Res. 2002;62:3120–3125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hobbs RF, Song H, Watchman CJ, Bolch WE, Aksnes AK, Ramdahl T, Flux GD, Sgouros G. A bone marrow toxicity model for (2)(2)(3)Ra alpha-emitter radiopharmaceutical therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:3207–3222. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/10/3207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Larsen R, Henriksen G, Bruland O. Preparation and use of radium-223 to target calcified tissues for pain palliation, bone cancer therapy, and bone surface conditioning. Google Patents. 2003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Mitchell DJ. GADRAS-PC1, Gamma Detector Response and Analysis Software, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND92-0285 UC-702. 1992 [Google Scholar]
  11. Mokhodoeva O, Guseva L, Dogadkin N. Isolation of generator-produced Ra-223 in 0.9-% NaCl solutions containing EDTA for direct radiotherapeutic studies. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2015;304:449–453. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ottewell PD, Wang N, Meek J, Fowles CA, Croucher PI, Eaton CL, Holen I. Castration-induced bone loss triggers growth of disseminated prostate cancer cells in bone. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2014;21:769–781. doi: 10.1530/ERC-14-0199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parker C, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, Helle SI, O'Sullivan JM, Fossa SD, Chodacki A, Wiechno P, Logue J, Seke M, Widmark A, Johannessen DC, Hoskin P, Bottomley D, James ND, Solberg A, Syndikus I, Kliment J, Wedel S, Boehmer S, Dall'Oglio M, Franzen L, Coleman R, Vogelzang NJ, O'Bryan-Tear CG, Staudacher K, Garcia-Vargas J, Shan M, Bruland OS, Sartor O Investigators A. Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:213–223. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1213755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Radchenko V, Engle J, Wilson JJ, Maassen J, Nortier M, Taylor W, Birnbaum E, Hudston L, John K, Fassbender M. A new strategy for isolation of Ac from proton-irradiated thorium. J Labelled Compd Rad. 2015a;58:S27–S27. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.12.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Radchenko V, Engle JW, Wilson JJ, Maassen JR, Nortier FM, Taylor WA, Birnbaum ER, Hudston LA, John KD, Fassbender ME. Application of ion exchange and extraction chromatography to the separation of actinium from proton-irradiated thorium metal for analytical purposes. J Chromatogr A. 2015b;1380:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.12.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Soderquist CZ, McNamara BK, Fisher DR. Production of high-purity radium-223 from legacy actinium-beryllium neutron sources. Curr Radiopharm. 2012;5:244–252. doi: 10.2174/1874471011205030244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weidner JW, Mashnik SG, John KD, Ballard B, Birnbaum ER, Bitteker LJ, Couture A, Fassbender ME, Goff GS, Gritzo R, Hemez FM, Runde W, Ullmann JL, Wolfsberg LE, Nortier FM. Ac-225 and Ra-223 production via 800 MeV proton irradiation of natural thorium targets. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2012;70:2590–2595. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wideroe R. Radiobiological effects and dose-LET spectra. Radiat Environ Biophys. 1979;16:245–250. doi: 10.1007/BF01358285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES