Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Dec 1;4(6):e00950-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00950-16

Draft Anaplasma phagocytophilum Genome Sequences from Five Cows, Two Horses, and One Roe Deer Collected in Europe

Thibaud Dugat a, Marie-Noëlle Rossignol b, Olivier Rué c, Valentin Loux c, Sylvain Marthey b, Marco Moroldo b, Cornelia Silaghi d,*, Dirk Höper e, Julia Fröhlich d, Martin Pfeffer e, Erich Zweygarth d,*, Anne-Claire Lagrée f, Henri-Jean Boulouis f, Nadia Haddad f,
PMCID: PMC5137398  PMID: 27908984

Abstract

Anaplasma phagocytophilum is a zoonotic tick-borne intracellular bacterium responsible for granulocytic anaplasmosis. As it is difficult to isolate and cultivate, only 20 A. phagocytophilum genomes have been sequenced to date. Here, we present eight A. phagocytophilum genome sequences obtained using alternative approaches based on sequence capture technology.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Anaplasma phagocytophilum is a zoonotic and obligate intracellular bacterium transmitted by hard ticks. It is the causative agent of tick-borne fever in ruminants, a disease which causes significant economic losses in Europe, and of equine granulocytic anaplasmosis (EGA) in horses, of canine granulocytic anaplasmosis (CGA) in dogs, and of human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) in both the United States and Europe (1). A. phagocytophilum is difficult to isolate and cultivate, and thus only 20 genomes have been sequenced to date, among which only four originate from European samples. In particular, there are no A. phagocytophilum genomes from horse or roe deer samples, even though EGA can have such important economic impact (2), and roe deer are suspected to play a crucial role as reservoir hosts in A. phagocytophilum epidemiology (1). Here, we present the draft genome sequences of European A. phagocytophilum from four cow and two horse samples, and two strains isolated from one cow and one roe deer which had been maintained in continuous cell cultures (3, 4).

To overcome limitations due to the lack of reliable, easy, and feasible protocols to isolate A. phagocytophilum, we decided to follow a different strategy in order to obtain these genome sequences. We used a whole-genome sequence capture approach, whose efficacy on A. phagocytophilum has already been demonstrated (5). For each sample, total genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood of the animal, or from bacterial culture in IDE8 tick cell lines, using the NucleoSpin Blood QuickPure kit (Macherey-Nagel, Bethlehem, USA). The six bacterial genomes from animal blood were then captured and sequenced as previously described (5), but in this case a liquid-phase protocol based on the SeqCap EZ library kit (NimbleGen, Madison, USA) was used instead of solid-phase. All eight samples were sequenced on a single flow cell lane of a HiSeq3000 (Illumina, San Diego, USA) sequencer as paired-end 150 bp reads (insert-size: 280 ± 50 bp).

First, overlapping paired-end reads were merged with Flash (6) and were trimmed with Sickle (https://github.com/najoshi/sickle) (−n −q 24 −l 100). Reads were digitally normalized using Khmer (7) with a k-mer size of 20 and a cutoff of 20. Then, the remaining reads were mapped to the host genomes [Bos taurus (UMD3.1), Equus caballus (EquCab2.0), and Capreolus capreolus (CCMK000000000)] and to A. phagocytophilum HZ (NC_007797.1), using the BWA algorithm (v0.6.1) with default parameters (8). Only those reads mapping to A. phagocytophilum or which remained unmapped were retained. Three sets of reads were used for assembly processing: paired-end reads mapped on A. phagocytophilum, paired-end unmapped reads, and singleton reads (unmapped or mapped to A. phagocytophilum). Those reads were then assembled using Spades (9), with a k-mer value from 81 to 125 with a step of 4, and default parameters. Genome annotation was performed using Prokka. Genome characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1 .

Genome sequence accession numbers

Sample Nucleotide sequence accession no. Host Geographical origin Genome size (bp) No. of contigs (scaffolds) G+C (%) No. of genes
Cow_1 FLLR01000001FLLR01000249 Cow France 1,682,137  249 41.93 1,519
Cow_2 FLMA01000001FLMA01000230 Cow France 1,641,350  230 42.23 1,463
Cow_3 FLMB01000001FLMB01000191 Cow France 1,561,654  191 42.00 1,417
Cow_4 FLLZ01000001FLLZ01000230 Cow France 1,604,419  230 42.12 1,448
Cow_5 FLMD02000001FLMD02000300 Cow Germany 2,196,284  300 43.70 1,979
Horse_1 FLMF02000001FLMF02000300 Horse France 1,784,294  300 41.90 1,657
Horse_2 FLMC02000001FLMC02000300 Horse France 2,191,611  300 41.58 1,997
Roe_deer_1 FLME02000001FLME02000300 Roe deer Germany 2,120,290  300 42.72 1,912

Accession number(s).

The eight draft genomes have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (Table 1).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was performed within the Laboratory of Excellence (Labex) of Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases (IBEID).

This work was supported by the Alfort National Veterinary School (ENVA), by the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), and by the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (Anses). Thibaud Dugat was funded by Anses.

Footnotes

Citation Dugat T, Rossignol M-N, Rué O, Loux V, Marthey S, Moroldo M, Silaghi C, Höper D, Fröhlich J, Pfeffer M, Zweygarth E, Lagrée A-C, Boulouis H-J, Haddad N. 2016. Draft Anaplasma phagocytophilum genome sequences from five cows, two horses, and one roe deer collected in Europe. Genome Announc 4(6):e00950-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00950-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Dugat T, Lagrée A-C, Maillard R, Boulouis H-J, Haddad N. 2015. Opening the black box of Anaplasma phagocytophilum diversity: current situation and future perspectives. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 5:61. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dzięgiel B, Adaszek Ł, Kalinowski M, Winiarczyk S. 2013. Equine granulocytic anaplasmosis. Res Vet Sci 95:316–320. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Silaghi C, Kauffmann M, Passos LM, Pfister K, Zweygarth E. 2011. Isolation, propagation and preliminary characterisation of Anaplasma phagocytophilum from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the tick cell line IDE8. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2:204–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2011.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wernike K, Silaghi C, Nieder M, Pfeffer M, Beer M. 2014. Dynamics of Schmallenberg virus infection within a cattle herd in Germany, 2011. Epidemiol Infect 142:1501–1504. doi: 10.1017/S0950268813002525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dugat T, Loux V, Marthey S, Moroldo M, Lagrée A-C, Boulouis H-J, Haddad N, Maillard R. 2014. Comparative genomics of first available bovine Anaplasma phagocytophilum genome obtained with targeted sequence capture. BMC Genomics 15:973. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Magoč T, Salzberg SL. 2011. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics Oxf Engl 27:2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Crusoe MR, Alameldin HF, Awad S, Boucher E, Caldwell A, Cartwright R, Charbonneau A, Constantinides B, Edvenson G, Fay S, Fenton J, Fenzl T, Fish J, Garcia-Gutierrez L, Garland P, Gluck J, González I, Guermond S, Guo J, Gupta A, Herr JR, Howe A, Hyer A, Härpfer A, Irber L, Kidd R, Lin D, Lippi J, Mansour T, McA’Nulty P, McDonald E, Mizzi J, Murray KD, Nahum JR, Nanlohy K, Nederbragt AJ, Ortiz-Zuazaga H, Ory J, Pell J, Pepe-Ranney C, Russ ZN, Schwarz E, Scott C, Seaman J, Sievert S, Simpson J, Skennerton CT, Spencer J, Srinivasan R, Standage D, Stapleton JA, Steinman SR, Stein J, Taylor B, Trimble W, Wiencko HL, Wright M, Wyss B, Zhang Q, Zyme E, Brown CT. 2015. The khmer software package: enabling efficient nucleotide sequence analysis. F1000Res 4:900. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6924.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics Oxf Engl 25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES