Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Macro Lett. 2016 Sep 20;5(10):1128–1131. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00560

Poly(isoprenecarboxylates) from Glucose via Anhydromevalonolactone

Nicolas R Ball-Jones 1, Grant W Fahnhorst 1, Thomas R Hoye 1,*
PMCID: PMC5137944  NIHMSID: NIHMS823559  PMID: 27933217

Abstract

A short and efficient synthesis of a series of isoprenecarboxylic acid esters (ICAEs) and their corresponding polymers is presented. The base-catalyzed eliminative ring-opening of anhydromevalonolactone (3) provides isoprenecarboxylic acid (6-H), which was further transformed to the ICAEs. Reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization was used to synthesize high molecular weight (>100 kg mol−1) poly(isoprenecarboxylates) with dispersities (Đ) of ca. 1.5. The glass transition temperatures (Tg) and entanglement molecular weights (Me) of the poly(isoprenecarboxylates) were determined and showed similar trends to the Tg and Me values for analogous poly(acrylate esters). These new glucose-derived materials could provide a sustainable alternative to poly(acrylates).

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-823559-f0001.jpg


The synthesis of polymers from renewable feedstocks is of growing importance to a sustainable society. We sought to capitalize on the ready availability of mevalonate (1), for which an efficient bioengineered preparation via fermentation of glucose has recently been developed in the Zhang laboratory.1 The carboxylate 1 can be readily converted (Scheme 1) through acidification to mevalonolactone (2) and, in turn, anhydromevalonolactone (3). Simple hydrogenation then gives β-methyl-δ-valerolactone (βMδVL, 4). This saturated lactone has been demonstrated by investigators in the Hillmyer, Bates, and Macosko laboratories to be an effective monomer for ring-opening transesterification polymerization (ROTEP) enroute to valuable polyesters containing PβMδVL.1,2

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

The facile chemical conversion of mevalonate (1) to β-methyl-δ-valerolactone (βMδVL, 4) via mevalonolactone (2) and anhydromevalonolactone (3)

We have been exploring various alternative strategies that capitalize on the ready availability of 2-4 in ways that might lead to additional novel monomers and/or polymers. (Z)-3-Methylpenta-2,4-dienoic acid (or isoprenecarboxylic acid, 6-H, Figure 1) has been prepared from anhydromevalonolactone (3).3,4 However, we can find no reports of the polymerization of 6-H or any of its esters (6-R). In contrast, 4-methylpenta-2,4-dienoate (7),5 sorbic acid esters (8),6 pentadienoates (9),7 and 3-methylene-4-pentenoates 8 have all been polymerized under one or more of radical, anionic, or cationic conditions. Light-induced topochemical polymerizations of the related dienoate salts 11a-d have also been described.9 All of these unsymmetrical dienic monomers can, in principle, give rise to a variety of regioisomeric relationships in the derived polymeric backbones. For example, methyl penta-2,4-dienoate (9 or β-vinylacrylate) has been radically polymerized to give a homopolymer comprising an 85:15 mixture of backbone repeat units arising from competitive 1,4- vs. 1,2-addition.7 Finally, we also note the recent work of Boday and coworkers, who polymerized “methylidenelactide”10 and pointed out that this compound was one of only a few examples of acrylate-like monomers in which all atoms are bio-derived (the others arising from itaconic or levulinic acid or via bioengineered routes to acrylic acid from sugars).11

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Isoprenecarboxylic acid (6-H) and its esters (6-R) described here and related dienoates (7–11) whose polymerizations have been previously described.

We report here the preparation of a series of esters derived from 6-H and their radical polymerization to poly(isoprenecarboxylates). Cornforth first demonstrated3 the eliminative opening of lactone 3, most likely via 5 and an E1cB mechanism, under the action of potassium tert-butoxide (Scheme 2). Acidification gives the acid 6-H. We have routinely prepared and isolated the potassium salt 6-K on multi-ten-gram scales. The non-nucleophilic bases NaOiPr or 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) also effect this transformation, although not as cleanly as KOtBu. Other known methods for accessing this penta-2,4-dienoic acid are less attractive from a preparative point of view: e.g. cross-coupling of alkenylstannanes,12 multi-step sequences,13 or generation as a mixture of 3- and 4-methylpentadienoic acids from isoprene.14 Fischer esterification of 6-H with any of the alcohols MeOH, EtOH, or n-BuOH gave, following distillation, each of the esters 6-Me, 6-Et, and 6-nBu, respectively, in the yield indicated in Scheme 2. Alternatively, the tert-butyl ester 6-tBu was prepared by suspension of 6-H in isobutylene and treatment with H2SO4 as a Brønsted acid catalyst.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Elimination reaction to form the dienoate potassium salt 6-K and subsequent Fischer esterification of the conjugate acid 6-H to provide isoprenecarboxylate esters 6-R

We first used azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) to initiate a polymerization of methyl isoprenecarboxylate (6-Me) (Scheme 3) to provide poly(methyl isoprenecarboxylate) (PMIC). This reaction was examined both in the bulk and in methanol at varying initial monomer concentrations. This demonstrated that 6-Me behaves in a similar fashion to other conjugated dienoates (Figure 1). 1H and 13C NMR analysis of the PMIC suggested that the polymerization occurs via competing 1,4- and 1,2-addition modes in a ratio of ca. 1.5:1. Additionally, the broad nature of nearly all resonances were indicative of the likely formation of multiple diastereomeric relationships among the new stereogenic alkene (E/Z) and sp3 carbon atoms (R/S) that arise from the addition of each monomer.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Free radical polymerization of 6-Me, initiated by AIBN as both a neat sample and in MeOH solution

We carried out a competition experiment in which the two diene monomers 6-Me and ethyl sorbate (ethyl hexa-2,4-dienoate) were copolymerized to partial (ca. 50%) conversion under AIBN initiation in order to gain some insight about the relative reactivity of the two. Although overlap of resonances from each of the unreactive monomers and the copolymer product made it difficult to obtain precise quantitative assessment, we conclude that the 6-Me was consumed ca. 4 times faster than the ethyl sorbate. This is consistent with an expected easier approach of any propagating radical to the unsubstituted methylene carbon (C5) of the monomer 6-Me compared to attack at C5 of ethyl sorbate.

To gain additional control over Mn and lower the dispersities of the polymer products, especially when made via bulk polymerization,15 we explored several reversible deactivation radical polymerization strategies.16 Nitroxide mediated radical polymerization of 6-Me in the bulk initiated by TIPNO-St17 behaved in a manner characteristic of a living polymerization; the Mn increased linearly with conversion (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). This product showed a substantially lower dispersity (Đ = 1.45) than that of the polymer prepared from the AIBN bulk polymerization (cf. Scheme 3).

Because of the somewhat exotic nature of the TIPNO-St initiator, we also explored reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization of the esters 6-R (Figure 2a). When 6-Me (1 equiv) was polymerized in the presence of AIBN (8×10−5 equiv) and the trithiocarbonate 12 (DDMAT18, 1×10−3 equiv) as the RAFT agent, the resulting PMIC showed an Mn of 150 kg•mol−1 and a dispersity of 1.5 (SEC vs. PS). The Tg of the sample was 34 °C and its entanglement molecular weight (Me = 4ρRT/5Gn°) was 17 kg•mol−1. The RAFT polymerization of 6-Me again appeared to be living (Figure 2b). As has been reported with, for example, methyl methacrylate, this RAFT polymerization also proceeded in the absence of a radical initiator.19,20 It is also worth noting that neither of these controlled polymerization methods altered the ratio of 1,4- vs. 1,2-addition modes of polymerization (i.e., the ratio remained ca. 1.5:1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

RAFT polymerization of isoprenecarboxylates 6-R. (a) Conditions used for the polymerization of bulk samples of each of 6-Me, 6-Et, 6-nBu, and 6-tBu. (b) SEC of aliquots vs. time for polymerization of 6-Me (in the presence of 0.01 equiv of 12) showing linear increase in molecular weight with % conversion.

With the goal of establishing the effect of the ester alkyl moiety on Tg and Me, we also prepared high molecular weight polymer samples from the series of esters 6-Et, 6-nBu, and 6-tBu. Samples of each of PEIC, PnBIC, and PtBIC having Mn >100 kg•mol−1 were prepared using AIBN and 12. The Tgs and Mes of these poly(isoprenecarboxylates) are given in Table 1a. The Tgs decrease as the ester alkyl moiety grows in size until the t-butyl analogue is reached, in which case there is a substantial increase in the Tg. This is quite analogous to the trend seen for simple poly(acrylate) esters (cf. Table 1b). Similarly, the Mes for the poly(isoprenecarboxylates) parallel those for the analogous poly(acrylates). The former tend to be higher than the latter for most of the same ester alkyl groups, perhaps reflecting the contribution from the larger side chain moieties arising from the 1,2-mode of polymerization of the isoprenecarboxylate monomers 6.

Table 1. Glass transition temperature (Tg) and Me of poly(isoprenecarboxylates) vs. poly(acrylates).

(a) Comparison of glass transition temperatures (Tg) and entanglement molecular weights (Me) for the four PICA esters; all five samples had Mn >100 kg·mol−1. (b) Tg and Me for poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA), poly(ethyl acrylate) (PEA), poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PnBA), and poly(t-butyl acrylate) (PtBA).

a Poly(isoprenecarboxylates)
PMIC PEIC PnBIC PtBIC
Tg (°C) 34 10 −19 55
Me (kg/mol) 17 22 41 39
b Poly(acrylates)
PMA PEA PnBA PtBA
Tg (°C) 22a −8a −43a 55a
Me (kg/mol) 9b 12c 29d NA
a

Ref. 21a-d.

b

Ref. 21a-d.

c

Ref. 21a-d.

d

Ref. 21a-d.

In summary, we have prepared a series of four esters of isoprenecarboxylic acid (6-H) that differ in the size of the ester alkyl moiety. This parent acid was made by an eliminative opening of anhydromevalonolactone (3), a commodity efficiently available in large quantities from glucose.1 Each ester was polymerized under RAFT conditions to provide a series of high molecular weight polymers. The glass transition temperature and entanglement molecular weight of each was determined. The ester alkyl group in these polymers affected the Tg and Me in a very similar fashion as is known for simple poly(acrylates). This work establishes the feasibility of using glucose as a source of polymers with acrylate-like properties.

Supplementary Material

SI PDF

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank David W. Giles and Christopher W. Macosko for assistance with rheology studies, and Kechun Zhang for providing the mevalonate fermentation broth. Financial support for this research was provided by the Center for Sustainable Polymers at the University of Minnesota, an NSF-supported Center for Chemical Innovation (CHE-1413862). Some of the NMR data were recorded on an instrument purchased with support of the NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant program (S10OD011952).

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website a DOI: ###.

Experimental procedures for preparation and structural characterization and copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra of monomers 6 and the derived poly(isoprenecarboxylate esters).

The authors are inventors on a provisional patent application.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Xiong M, Schneiderman DK, Bates FS, Hillmyer MA, Zhang K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014;111:8357–8362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404596111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a Zhang J, Li T, Mannion AM, Schneiderman DK, Hillmyer MA, Bates FS. ACS Macro Lett. 2016;5:407–412. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Schneiderman DK, Vanderlaan ME, Mannion AM, Panthani TR, Batiste DC, Wang JZ, Bates FS, Macosko CW, Hillmyer MA. ACS Macro Lett. 2016;5:515–518. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cornforth JW, Cornforth RH, Popjak G, Gore IY. Biochem. J. 1958;69:146–155. doi: 10.1042/bj0690146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moriconi EJ, Meyer WC. J. Org. Chem. 1971;36:2841–2849. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Arbuzova IA, Efremova VN, Eliseeva AG, Mikhailova NV, Nikitin VN, Sidorovich AV, Klushin NA, Kuvshinskii EV. Vysokomolekulyarnye Soedineniya, Seriya A. 1970;12:697–704. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.For example, Takasu A, Ishii M, Inai Y, Hirabayashi T. Macromolecules. 2001;34:6548–6550.
  • 7.Ueda M, Shimada S, Ogata T, Oikawa K, Ito H, Yamada B. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 1995;33:1059–1067. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sheares VV. 2002 Feb 5; US Patent 6,344,538 B1.
  • 9.Matsumoto A, Sada K, Tashiro K, Miyata M, Tsubouchi T, Tanaka T, Odani T, Nagahama S, Tanaka T, Inoue K, Saragai S, Nakamoto S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2002;41:2502–2505. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020715)41:14<2502::AID-ANIE2502>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Methylidenelactide: Inline graphic
  • 11.Mauldin TC, Wertz JT, Boday DJ. ACS Macro Lett. 2016;5:544–546. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abarbri M, Parrain J-L, Duchêne A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995;36:2469–2472. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nakai T, Mikami K, Taya S, Kimura Y, Mimura T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981;22:69–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huguet N, Jevtovikj I, Gordillo A, Lejkowski ML, Lindner R, Bru M, Khalimon AY, Rominger F, Schunk SA, Hofmann P, Limbach M. Chem. Eur. J. 2014;20:16858–16862. doi: 10.1002/chem.201405528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dvornić PR, Jaćović MS. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1981;21:792–796. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jenkins AD, Jones RG, Moad G. Pure Appl. Chem. 2009;82:483–491. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.TIPNO-St: N-(tert-butyl)-N-(2-methyl-1-phenylpropyl)-O-(1-phenylethyl)hydroxylamine: Benoit D, Chaplinski V, Braslau R, Hawker CJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:3904–3920.
  • 18.DDMAT: 2-{[(dodecylthio)carbonothioyl]thio}-2-methylpropanoic acid.
  • 19.Stickler M, Meyerhoff G. Makromol. Chem. 1978;179:2729–2745. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Paulus RM, Becer CR, Hoogenboom R, Schubert US. Aust. J. Chem. 2009;62:254–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.a Penzel E. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Vol. 28. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; Weinheim, Germany: 2000. Polyacrylates. pp. 515–536. [Google Scholar]; b Fetters LJ, Lohse DJ, Richter D, Witten TA, Zirkelt A. Macromolecules. 1994;27:4639–4647. [Google Scholar]; c Andreozzi L, Castelvetro V, Faetti M, Giordano M, Zulli F. Macromolecules. 2006;39:1880–1889. [Google Scholar]; d Yamazaki H, Takeda M, Kohno Y, Ando H, Urayama K, Takigawa T. Macromolecules. 2011;44:8829–8834. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI PDF

RESOURCES