Vincent and colleagues discussed some of the key issues related to antibiotic management in the critically ill, including problems associated with timing, duration, and dosing of antibiotics [1]. In particular, the authors highlighted the importance of early diagnosis of infection and controversies about the use of combination or monotherapy and the duration of therapy [1]. We agree that decisions regarding the use of antibiotics should be made on an individual basis, e.g., according to the severity of the disease and local microbiological patterns [1]. However, some issues should be taken into account in determining an antibiotic therapy.
Vincent et al.’s review covered all infections in the critically ill but, with regard to the duration of antibiotic treatment, the authors referred to a guideline for the management of sepsis and septic shock only [2]. Dichotomy according to nosocomial or community-acquired infection seems necessary to make better decisions. Moreover, severe nosocomial infections like sepsis due to resistant Gram-negative bacteria and mild infections like community-acquired pneumonia caused by a susceptible microorganism may need different guidelines. Non-intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia has recently been proposed as a new clinical entity, as epidemiological data seem to be different between patients acquiring hospital-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit versus general wards [3].
Among others, the consciousness state of the critically ill seems important for the initiation or discontinuation of antibiotic treatment. Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the most frequent intensive care unit-related infection in patients requiring mechanical ventilation, and comatose patients present a high risk of early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia [4]. For comatose patients who required mechanical ventilation, antibiotic prophylaxis at intubation lowers the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia [4]. In patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia due to non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, there appears to be a higher risk of recurrence following short-course therapy, i.e., a 7–8-day course [5].
Doctors in Western countries may say that it takes seven days to cure a common cold with medication but it will take a week to get better without it, but this advice does not apply to developing countries like China. Subsequent bacterial infections may prolong a common cold to as long as one month. The use of antibiotics varies substantially, even among developed countries. This discrepancy is particularly important for pediatric patients and the elderly with poor health. In conclusion, for antibiotic medication, general recommendations should be tempered by awareness of many local and specific factors in order to get the best effect from medicines.
Acknowledgements
Thanks for the suggestion from Dr. Hong-Liang Zhang and Ms Jingyan Yang, which helped us to revise the letter and have better understanding of antibiotics.
Authors’ contributions
RJ wrote this letter and the idea for it was from LJ. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
All the authors agree with the publication of this letter in Critical Care.
Footnotes
See related research by Vincent et al., http://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-016-1285-6
Contributor Information
Rufu Jia, Email: zxyy5688@126.com.
Linpei Jia, Phone: 0086-18210483301, Email: anny_069@163.com.
References
- 1.Vincent JL, Bassetti M, François B, Karam G, Chastre J, Torres A, et al. Advances in antibiotic therapy in the critically ill. Crit Care. 2016;20:133. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1285-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165–228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Di Pasquale M, Aliberti S, Mantero M, Bianchini S, Blasi F. Non-intensive care unit acquired pneumonia: a new clinical entity? Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(3):287. doi: 10.3390/ijms17030287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vallés J, Peredo R, Burgueño MJ, de Freitas AP R, Millán S, Espasa M, et al. Efficacy of single-dose antibiotic against early-onset pneumonia in comatose patients who are ventilated. Chest. 2013;143:1219–25. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pugh R, Grant C, Cooke RP, Dempsey G. Short-course versus prolonged-course antibiotic therapy for hospital-acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;8:CD007577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007577.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grimaldi D, Llitjos JF, Pène F. Post-infectious immune suppression: a new paradigm of severe infections. Med Mal Infect. 2014;44:455–63. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2014.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]