Abstract
We report the design of a phosphorescence/fluorescence dual-emissive nanoscale metal–organic framework (NMOF), R-UiO, as an intracellular oxygen (O2) sensor. R-UiO contains a Pt(II)-porphyrin ligand as an O2-sensitive probe and a Rhodamine-B isothiocyanate ligand as an O2-insensitive reference probe. It exhibits good crystallinity, high stability, and excellent ratiometric luminescence response to O2 partial pressure. In vitro experiments confirmed the applicability of R-UiO as an intracellular O2 biosensor. This work is the first report of a NMOF-based intracellular oxygen sensor and should inspire the design of ratiometric NMOF sensors for other important analytes in biological systems.
Oxygen (O2) is a vital component in aerobic respiration that provides metabolic energy to cells. Hypoxia—a reduction in normal levels of O2—is related to various diseases,1 including vascular disease, pulmonary disease, and cancer.2 For instance, sustained hypoxia in a growing tumor can result in a more aggressive phenotype.3 Monitoring and quantifying O2 levels in living cells are thus of great importance for cancer diagnosis, tumor pathophysiology assessment, and evaluation of the therapeutic effects of anticancer treatments. O2 tension can be detected and measured by several methods, including polarographic O2 needle electrodes,4 immunohistochemical staining,5 positron emission tomography imaging,6 magnetic resonance imaging,7 and photoluminescence imaging.8 Because of their high sensitivity and outstanding spatial resolution, photoluminescence-based techniques provide particularly powerful tools for sensing O2 in living cells. Ratiometric sensing, which uses an O2-insensitive reference and an O2-sensitive probe to measure emission ratios at two different wavelengths, can compensate for signal changes caused by disturbances from the external environment, such as light scattering and fluctuations in the excitation source,9 allowing for accurate measurements of O2 concentrations. Since Kopelman and co-workers first developed PEEBLEs (probes encapsulated by biologically localized embedding) containing a cyanine dye standard and a Pt-porphyrin phosphor for ratiometric O2 sensing,10 a number of polymeric nanoparticles,8c,e silica gels,11 and quantum dots12 have emerged as promising ratiometric O2 sensors.
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are an emerging class of porous materials built from metal ions or clusters bridged by organic linkers that have been explored as chemical sensors.13 Nanoscale MOFs (NMOFs) have also been used for small molecule sensing14 and biomedical imaging.15 NMOFs exhibit several characteristics that make them ideal nanomaterials for biological and biomedical applications. First, NMOFs have good crystallinity and structural tunability, which allow synthetic elaborations for specific applications. Second, NMOFs are highly porous, which allows them to accommodate high loadings of imaging/therapeutic agents, quickly diffuse small molecules (i.e., drugs, analytes), and prevent dye self-quenching. Third, NMOFs do not suffer from agent leaching due to covalent bonding. Fourth, NMOFs are intrinsically biodegradable in the long term due to their relatively labile metal–ligand bonds.16 For example, we have recently used a fluorescent NMOF for real-time intracellular pH sensing15a and a porphyrin-based NMOF in photodynamic therapy.17 Herein, we report the first NMOF probe for ratiometric O2 sensing in live cells.
We hypothesized that an NMOF with both O2-independent and -sensitive ligands would serve as an excellent ratiometric O2 sensor by taking advantage of the aforementioned features of NMOFs. Pt-5,15-di(p-benzoato)porphyrin (DBP-Pt) was chosen as an O2-sensitive bridging ligand, whereas Rhodamine-B isothiocyanate (RITC)-conjugated quaterphenyldicarboxylate (QPDC) was used as an O2-independent ligand to construct a ratiometric NMOF, R-UiO (Scheme 1). Pt-porphyrin shows bright phosphorescence with a long-lived triplet state at ambient temperature, and its phosphorescence intensity is highly dependent on O2 concentration, making it an ideal choice as an O2-sensitive probe in ratiometric O2 sensing.8c–e,10 We selected Rhodamine-B as a reference dye for the following reasons: (1) Absorption of Rhodamine-B and H2DBP-Pt at 500–540 nm allows for the simultaneous excitation of both dyes (Figure S5). (2) The non-overlap of Rhodamine-B fluorescence (570 nm) and H2DBP-Pt phosphorescence (630 nm) (Figure S5) facilitates ratiometric luminescence quantifications. (3) The pH-independent fluorescence of Rhodamine-B at pH >6 prevents disturbance due to cellular pH changes.18 (4) Emissions of both dyes at relatively long wavelengths (>570 nm) minimize background autofluorescence from live cells.
We further hypothesized that a mixed-ligand NMOF with both DBP-Pt and amino-quaterphenyldicarboxylate (QPDC-NH2) could be built due to the similar lengths of these ligands. We observed that the unit cell parameter of Zn-DPDBP-UiO17 (38.76 Å, DPDBP = 10,20-diphenyl-5,15-di(p-benzoato)-porphyrin), whose ligand is similar in structure to DBP-Pt, is only 0.2% larger than that of TPHN-UiO19 (38.68 Å, TPHN = 4,4′-bis(carboxyphenyl)-2-nitro-1,1′-biphenyl). The QPDC-NH2 ligands in the mixed-ligand NMOF could be readily conjugated with RITC to afford the dual-emissive R-UiO NMOF. Furthermore, the relative intensities of RITC fluorescence and DBP-Pt phosphorescence can be tuned by adjusting the feed ratio of the two dyes during MOF synthesis and post-synthesis modification, respectively.
H2QPDC-NH2 was obtained by Suzuki coupling between 4,4′-dibromo-2-amino-1,1′-biphenyl and 4-methoxycarbonylphenylboronic acid, followed by hydrolysis. H2DBP-Pt was synthesized by metalation of 5,15-di(4-methoxycarbonyl)-porphyrin (Me2DBP) with K2PtCl4 in benzonitrile under reflux, followed by hydrolysis in basic conditions, and characterized by NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (Scheme S2). A solvothermal reaction between H2DBP-Pt, H2QPDC-NH2, and HfCl4 in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at 80 °C afforded the mixed-ligand NMOF, M-UiO, as an orange powder (Scheme 1). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed hexagonal plate morphology with a diameter of ~200 nm and a thickness of ~30 nm (Figure 1b). Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), high-resolution TEM, and fast Fourier transform patterns showed that M-UiO displayed good crystallinity (Figures 1). The distance between adjacent secondary building units was measured to be ~2.26 nm by TEM, consistent with the distance of 2.18 nm calculated from the PXRD data. UV–vis spectrum of M-UiO showed only two Q-band peaks, suggesting no Pt leaching during NMOF synthesis (Figure S4).19 Inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) gave a DBP-Pt:QPDC-NH2 molar ratio of 6.2:93.8 in M-UiO.
Rhodamine-B was covalently attached to M-UiO by forming the thiourea linkage between QPDC-NH2 and RITC in R-UiO, which was confirmed by mass spectrometry (Figure S6). TEM images and PXRD patterns showed that R-UiO retained the plate-like morphology and the crystallinity of M-UiO (Figure 1a,f). Dynamic light scattering measurements gave an average diameter of 177.8 (PDI = 0.064) and 181.1 (PDI = 0.079) for M-UiO and R-UiO, respectively. The loadings of Rhodamine-B could be adjusted by controlling the feed amount of RITC, leading to R-UiO-1 and R-UiO-2 that contain 0.6 and 1.6 mol% Rhodamine-B, respectively (Figures S12 and S13).
R-UiO was incubated in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) buffer for 24 h to evaluate its stability in physiological conditions. After incubation, the d111 peak in the PXRD pattern was split into two peaks (Figure 1a), likely due to minor lattice distortion in the buffer solution. Nevertheless, TEM image clearly indicated the preservation of lattice fringes (Figures 2f, S9, and S10). Moreover, there is no Rhodamine-B or DBP-Pt leaching after incubation (Figure S8), suggesting adequate stability for oxygen sensing in the media.
To achieve ratiometric quantification using a single excitation and simultaneous detection of RITC fluorescence and DBP-Pt phosphorescence, there cannot be energy transfer from DBP-Pt to Rhodamine-B. This lack of energy transfer was confirmed by (1) a negligible overlap between H2DBP-Pt emission and Rhodamine-B absorption (Figure S5), (2) the presence of only characteristic DBP-Pt phosphorescence, but not RITC fluorescence upon exciting R-UiO at 391 nm (corresponding to H2DBP-Pt soret band, Figure S11), and (3) similar phosphorescence lifetimes of R-UiO and H2DBP-Pt (Figure S16). Ratiometric sensing was first carried out by fluorimetry with a 514 nm excitation light source in order to match the laser in confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Under a nitrogen-saturated atmosphere (pO2 = 0 mmHg), R-UiO-1 showed a strong emission at 630 nm from DBP-Pt and a weak emission at 570 nm attributed to RITC (Figure 2a). As pO2 gradually increased to aerated atmosphere (pO2 = 160 mmHg), the RITC fluorescence remained unchanged, while the DBP-Pt phosphorescence decreased significantly as expected. We quantitatively analyzed oxygen quenching by fitting the data to the Stern–Volmer equation,20
(1) |
where KSV is the Stern–Volmer constant, and and RI = IP/IF are the ratios of phosphorescence intensity to fluorescence intensity in the absence and presence of oxygen, respectively. showed a good linear relationship with respect to pO2 up to 80 mmHg (Figure 2b). Beyond this point, the ratio deviated from the Stern–Volmer plot (Figure S14). Such a deviation was also observed in previous reports7,21 and is probably related to the complicated dynamics involved in the MOF structure. Fortunately, pO2 in biological tissues is typically below 70 mmHg (except in arterial blood).22 Within this range, the intensity ratio fitted well to the Stern–Volmer equation with KSV = 0.015 mmHg−1. The O2 quenching experiment proved that R-UiO is a good O2 sensor by providing pO2-specific IP/IF ratios.
To further confirm the validity of ratiometric measurements using R-UiO, the phosphorescence lifetime of R-UiO-1 in HBSS buffer was measured under different pO2 (Figure 2c). The data were fitted by bi-exponential decay. The amplitude weighted lifetime τ (28.1 µs) in a deoxygenated (0 mmHg) atmosphere steadily decreased as pO2 increased and reached 7.54 µs in an aerated atmosphere (160 mmHg). The lifetime was fitted according to eq 2 (Figure 2d):
(2) |
where τ0 and τ are weighted lifetimes in the absence and presence of oxygen, respectively. The obtained KSV = 0.017 mmHg−1 is similar to the ratiometric measurement result, which indicates negligible static quenching of R-UiO-1.
Next we tested the validity of the ratiometric sensors by CLSM. R-UiO-2 was dispersed in HBSS buffer and subjected to CLSM imaging under different pO2. Upon excitation with a 514 nm agon laser, signals in the ranges of 620–660 and 540–580 nm were collected in two separate channels (Figure S17) and analyzed by ImageJ to quantify the intensity ratios, IP/IF. Notably, the IP/IF−pO2 curve deviates from that obtained by fluorimetry (Figure 2a), which is reasonable, given that the process of collecting photoluminescence on a CLSM is much more complicated than using a fluorimeter. Many factors besides pO2 such as laser power and dwell time can influence the absolute and relative intensities of phosphorescence/fluorescence.23 We also noticed that the phosphorescence component was more prominent under CLSM with our instrument settings, so we used R-UiO-2 with a higher RITC loading for CLSM experiments. The IP/IF−pO2 curves obtained by CLSM are highly reproducible with the IP/IF ratio gradually decreasing as pO2 increases, and are fitted with a rational function (fomula S2, SI) which serves as a standard curve for intracellular pO2 measurements.
We chose mouse colon carcinoma CT26 cells with a low background autofluorescence for in vitro imaging. The cellular uptake of R-UiO-2 in CT26 cells was first investigated by incubating CT26 cells with 30 µg/mL R-UiO-2 for different times. Cytotoxicity assay indicates that R-UiO is biocompatible (Figure S18). Time-dependent endocytosis was quantified by ICP-MS and shown in Figure 3b. Efficient cellular uptake (~2.5 pg/cell) was observed after a 2 h incubation, which indicates feasibility for intracellular pO2 measurements.
Finally, we used R-UiO-2 to examine cellular O2 levels. CT26 cells were incubated with R-UiO-2 for 2 h. The culturing media were then exchanged to HBSS buffer with different pO2 in a sealed chamber, and cells were incubated for another 15 min to ensure efficient oxygen exchange across cell plasma membranes. CLSM settings were identical to those used for the calibration curve. We tested three different pO2 conditions: 4, 32, and 160 mmHg, which represent hypoxia, normoxia and aerated conditions, respectively. Different channels of cellular uptake of R-UiO-2 captured by CLSM are shown in Figure S19. The IP/IF ratios of R-UiO-2 are shown by pseudocolor images in Figure 3c. The IP/IF values of internalized R-UiO-2 analyzed by ImageJ were 5.29 ± 0.12, 4.45 ± 0.09, and 2.80 ± 0.06, corresponding to 5.1 ± 2.5, 27.3 ± 3.1, and 158 ± 11 mmHg (see SI for error analysis), respectively, according to the calibration curve in Figure 3a. The results matched well with the preset pO2 in each chamber. These data suggest the broad range and good accuracy of R-UiO as intracellular oxygen sensor.
In conclusion, we have for the first time reported the rational design and synthesis of stable, crystalline, porous, and dual-emissive R-UiO NMOFs for ratiometric sensing of intracellular oxygen in live cells. This study should inspire the design of NMOF sensors for other biologically important analytes by taking advantage of the synthetic tunability, structural versatility, and other unique attributes of NMOFs.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the NIH (UO1-CA198989 and P30 CA014599) for funding support and Dr. Vytas Bindokas for help with confocal microscopy imaging. Additional support was provided by the Chicago MRSEC, which is funded by NSF through grant DMR-1420709.
Footnotes
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information
- Experimental details for the synthesis and characterization of M-UiO and R-UiO NMOFs, oxygen calibration and fitting, cellular uptake, and live cell imaging, including Figures S1–S20 (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ikeda Pathol. Int. 2005;55:603–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2005.01877.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harris AL. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2:38–47. doi: 10.1038/nrc704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Höckel M, Schlenger K, Aral B, Mitze M, Schäffer U, Vaupel P. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4509–4515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gatenby RA, Kessler HB, Rosenblum JS, Coia LR, Moldofsky PJ, Hartz WH, Broder G. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1988;14:831–838. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(88)90002-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hoogsteen IJ, Lok J, Marres HA, Takes RP, Rijken PF, van der Kogel AJ, Kaanders JH. Eur. J. Cancer. 2009;45:2906–2914. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mees G, Dierckx R, Vangestel C, Van de Wiele C. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2009;36:1674–1686. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1195-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Cooper RA, Carrington BM, Loncaster JA, Todd SM, Davidson SE, Logue JP, Luthra AD, Jones AP, Stratford I, Hunter RD. Radiother. Oncol. 2000;57:53–59. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00259-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Padhani AR, Krohn KA, Lewis JS, Alber M. Eur. Radiol. 2007;17:861–872. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0431-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Zhang G, Palmer GM, Dewhirst MW, Fraser CL. Nat. Mater. 2009;8:747–751. doi: 10.1038/nmat2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Spencer JA, Ferraro F, Roussakis E, Klein A, Wu J, Runnels JM, Zaher W, Mortensen LJ, Alt C, Turcotte R, et al. Nature. 2014;508:269–273. doi: 10.1038/nature13034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wu C, Bull B, Christensen K, McNeill J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:2741–2745. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wang X-d, Stolwijk JA, Lang T, Sperber M, Meier RJ, Wegener J, Wolfbeis OS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:17011–17014. doi: 10.1021/ja308830e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Zhao Q, Zhou X, Cao T, Zhang KY, Yang L, Liu S, Liang H, Yang H, Li F, Huang W. Chem. Sci. 2015;6:1825–1831. doi: 10.1039/c4sc03062a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Yoshihara T, Yamaguchi Y, Hosaka M, Takeuchi T, Tobita S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:4148–4151. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Feng Y, Cheng J, Zhou L, Zhou X, Xiang H. Analyst. 2012;137:4885–4901. doi: 10.1039/c2an35907c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Koo Y-EL, Cao Y, Kopelman R, Koo SM, Brasuel M, Philbert MA. Anal. Chem. 2004;76:2498–2505. doi: 10.1021/ac035493f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chojnacki P, Mistlberger G, Klimant I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:8850–8853. doi: 10.1002/anie.200702068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Amelia M, Lavie-Cambot A, McClenaghan ND, Credi A. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:325–327. doi: 10.1039/c0cc02163f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Kreno LE, Leong K, Farha OK, Allendorf M, Van Duyne RP, Hupp JT. Chem. Rev. 2012;112:1105–1125. doi: 10.1021/cr200324t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Liu D, Lu K, Poon C, Lin W. Inorg. Chem. 2014;53:1916–1924. doi: 10.1021/ic402194c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hu Z, Deibert BJ, Li J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:5815–5840. doi: 10.1039/c4cs00010b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Guo Z, Song X, Lei H, Wang H, Su S, Xu H, Qian G, Zhang H, Chen B. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:376–379. doi: 10.1039/c4cc06729k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) Yang W, Feng J, Song S, Zhang H. ChemPhysChem. 2012;13:2734–2738. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201200265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Suresh VM, Chatterjee S, Modak R, Tiwari V, Patel AB, Kundu TK, Maji TK. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014;118:12241–12249. [Google Scholar]; (c) Wu P, Wang J, He C, Zhang X, Wang Y, Liu T, Duan C. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012;22:1698–1703. [Google Scholar]
- 15.(a) He C, Lu K, Lin W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:12253–12256. doi: 10.1021/ja507333c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Taylor KM, Rieter WJ, Lin W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:14358–14359. doi: 10.1021/ja803777x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) deKrafft KE, Xie Z, Cao G, Tran S, Ma L, Zhou OZ, Lin W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:9901–9904. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Hatakeyama W, Sanchez TJ, Rowe MD, Serkova NJ, Liberatore MW, Boyes SG. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2011;3:1502–1510. doi: 10.1021/am200075q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Foucault-Collet A, Gogick KA, White KA, Villette S, Pallier A, Collet G, Kieda C, Li T, Geib SJ, Rosi NL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110:17199–17204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305910110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McKinlay AC, Morris RE, Horcajada P, Férey G, Gref R, Couvreur P, Serre C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010;49:6260–6266. doi: 10.1002/anie.201000048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lu K, He C, Lin W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:16712–16715. doi: 10.1021/ja508679h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Coppeta J, Rogers C. Exp. Fluids. 1998;25:1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Manna K, Zhang T, Greene FX, Lin W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:2665–2673. doi: 10.1021/ja512478y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.(a) Valeur B, Berberan-Santos MN. Molecular fluorescence: principles and applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2012. [Google Scholar]; (b) Turro NJ, Ramamurthy V, Scaiano JC. Modern molecular photochemistry of organic molecules. New York: Wiley Online Library; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang G, Chen J, Payne SJ, Kooi SE, Demas J, Fraser CL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:8942–8943. doi: 10.1021/ja0720255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Carreau A, Hafny-Rahbi BE, Matejuk A, Grillon C, Kieda C. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011;15:1239–1253. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01258.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Finikova OS, Lebedev AY, Aprelev A, Troxler T, Gao F, Garnacho C, Muro S, Hochstrasser RM, Vinogradov SA. ChemPhysChem. 2008;9:1673–1679. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200800296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.