Skip to main content
Journal of Physical Therapy Science logoLink to Journal of Physical Therapy Science
. 2016 Nov 29;28(11):3264–3266. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.3264

Effects of community-based rehabilitation program on activities of daily living and cognition in elderly chronic stroke survivors

Young-Ju Park 1, Chun-Yeop Lee 2,*
PMCID: PMC5140844  PMID: 27942164

Abstract

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to examine the effects of community-based rehabilitation program in chronic stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] Eleven subjects received community-based rehabilitation program ten times for ten months. The main outcome measures were the Modified Barthel Index score for activities of daily living and the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination score for cognition. [Results] The results of the study demonstrated that the community-based rehabilitation program improved activities of daily living performance and cognition significantly. [Conclusion] Based on the study results, the community-based rehabilitation program is an effective method for improving activities of daily living performance and cognitive function in elderly patients with chronic stroke.

Keywords: Community-based rehabilitation, Elderly, Stroke

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is one of the main causes of mortality and disability among the elderly1). Stroke results in serious complex functional problems in many areas, especially cognitive and physical impairments that significantly limit their activities of daily living (ADLs)2). Eventually, stroke survivors after returning to living in the community after discharge would need to attend alternative rehabilitation program3). Most stroke survivors experience several limitations to participate their community4), particularly ADL performance and cognition5).

Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) is an effective method for individuals with stroke and utilizes therapeutic resources from community. Therapists are important resources because they can conduct effective CBR programs and counsel those with stroke6). In South Korea, CBR programs have been conducted gradually for stroke patients7). Furthermore, most CBR programs were focused on motor recovery8) or cognition for stroke9). Further evidence regarding the effectiveness of CBR programs in various areas of rehabilitation of the elderly are needed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the CBR program on ADL performance and cognition, and to provide evidence for implementing the CBR program for elderly patients with chronic stroke.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study was carried out from April 2015 to January 2016, and the community-dwelling, elderly chronic stroke survivors were recruited at the J City Health Center. Every participant was required to meet the following inclusion criteria: (a) stroke identifiable by a medical doctor, (b) age ≥65 years, (c) 5 years post stroke, and (d) intact cognitive function for understanding program instructions. Participants were excluded if they (a) had any other neurological diseases except stroke, or (b) did not provide consent. This study was approved by the Inje University’s Institutional Review Board.

The CBR program comprised ADL (exercise) and cognition (crafts), and that was conducted in an auditorium of the J Health Center with group setting. The CBR program was summarized in Table 1. The CBR program performed for 2 hours in every session, once per month for ten months by two occupational therapists and four well-trained exercise assistants. The Modified Barthel Index (MBI) score10) was used to assess ADL performance. The Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K) score11) was used to assess cognitive function. The statistical analyses in this study were performed using SPSS 22.0. Demographics and clinical characteristics of the subjects were analyzed by using descriptive statistics. The mean differences between pre-and post-intervention scores were analyzed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and the significance level was at p<0.05.

Table 1. General characteristics of subjects.

Characteristics N (%)
Gender Male 4 (36.4)
Female 7 (63.6)
Age (years) 65–74 8 (72.8)
75–84 2 (18.2)
85 and above 1 (9.1)
Lesion type Hemorrhagic 4 (36.4)
Infarction 7 (63.6)
Paretic side Right 6 (54.5)
Left 5 (45.5)
Disease duration (years) 7.4 ± 0.9*

*Mean ± SD

RESULTS

Demographics and clinical characteristics of the subjects are summarized in Table 2. After applying the CBR program, as shown in Table 3, the MBI score significantly improved from 42.8 ± 25.6 to 63.2 ± 22.2 (p<0.05). Further, the MMSE-K score showed a significant improvement from 19.3 ± 5.1 to 21.5 ± 4.7 (p<0.05).

Table 2. CBR program.

Session ADL (Exercise) Cognition (Craft)
1 ROM exercise with towel Soap
2 ROM exercise with theraband Gardening
3 Static balance training Painting
4 Dynamic balance training with ball Paper
5 Fall prevention (OEP) collage
6 Locomotion training Wire
7 Fall prevention (OEP) Rubber band
8 Transfer training Beads
9 Fall prevention (OEP) Mosaic
10 Dressing training Setting plans

ADL: Activities of Daily Living, CBR: Community-Based Rehabilitation, OEP: Otago Exercise Program

Table 3. Comparison of pre and post-intervention scores of MBI and MMSE-K.

Pre-intervention Post-intervention
MBI 42.8 ± 25.6 63.2 ± 22.2*
MMSE-K 19.3 ± 5.1 21.5 ± 4.7*

MMSE-K: Korean Mini-Mental State Examination, MBI: Modified Barthel Index, Mean ± SD, *p<0.05

DISCUSSION

This research aimed to identify the effect of CBR on ADL performance and cognition in elderly patients with chronic stroke. We recruited patients treated at J City Health Center. It needs to be considered the possibility of any biased factor between interventions since the interventions were done once a month. Therefore we exclude subjects if they have attended any other treatment above this program. Fifteen subjects started on CBR program and 11 subjects finished for this reason.

The stroke survivors have dysfunction mentally as well as physically12). Therefore, we consisted of motor and cognition program in every session for ten months. This study was the first trial in application of motor and cognition for CBR program at the same time for elderly patients in South Korean. For this reason, this study would have more novelty than other studies for CBR. The MBI score was used to evaluate ADL performance and the MMSE-K score was used to assess cognition. The results of this study showed that the CBR program significantly improved ADLs and cognition. There are similar findings in previous studies about the effects of CBR program with stroke survivors on ADLs13) and cognition14). Comprehensive rehabilitations are needed for stroke to adapt their community. The CBR program has been centered around Health Centers and shown positive effects by various approach in South Korea15). There are several limitations of this study. The sample size was small, therefore its results may not be generalizable to the entire population of elderly with chronic stroke. Further, various intervention programs should be considered along with exercise and crafts.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the Sehan University Research Fund in 2016.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. : Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Body Functions. Disabil Rehabil, 2005, 27: 191–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dam M, Tonin P, Casson S, et al. : The effects of long-term rehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients. Stroke, 1993, 24: 1186–1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Song JY: Effect of a group self-exercise program on quality of life and motor functions after stroke. PTK, 2008, 15: 20–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mudzi W, Stewart A, Musenge E: Community participation of patients 12 months post-stroke in Johannesburg, South Africa. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med, 2013, 5: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim K, Kim YM, Kim EK: Correlation between the activities of daily living of stroke patients in a community setting and their quality of life. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 417–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee HS: A plan of activation of health care center in community based rehabilitation. J Spec Edu Rehabil Sci, 2008, 47: 47–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee HS, Ann CS, Kim MC, et al. : Patient preference for community-based rehabilitation programs after stroke. J Phys Ther Sci, 2011, 23: 137–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pang MY, Harris JE, Eng JJ: A community-based upper-extremity group exercise program improves motor function and performance of functional activities in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006, 87: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jeong WM, Lee DY, Ryu SH, et al. : Focused effects of a group cognitive rehabilitation therapy on mild dementia patients in a community-focused occupational therapy intervention process model. J Korean Soc Occup Ther, 2008, 16: 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B: Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol, 1989, 42: 703–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kwon YC, Park JH: Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K). Part I: Development of the test for the Elderly. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 1989, 28: 125–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wolfe CD, Crichton SL, Heuschmann PU, et al. : Estimates of outcomes up to ten years after stroke: analysis from the prospective South London Stroke Register. PLoS Med, 2011, 8: e1001033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Choi HS: Effects of a community-based rehabilitation program on cognitive status, ADL, and occupational performance/satisfaction of old patients. Bull Dongman Health Coll, 2002, 20: 185–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kwon JS, Yuk J, Byun EM: The effect of home based cognitive rehabilitation program on stroke patients. J Korean Soc Occup Ther, 2009, 17: 39–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lee HY, Sagong B: The effect of home based rehabilitation program on activities of daily living, self-efficacy, quality of life among chronic stroke patients. J Spec Edu Rehabil Sci, 2015, 54: 275–290. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Physical Therapy Science are provided here courtesy of Society of Physical Therapy Science

RESOURCES