Abstract
Marinobacter sp. strain X15-166BT was cultivated from sediment in Honolulu Harbor, Hawai‘i. The X15-166BT draft genome of 3,490,661 bp encodes 3,115 protein-coding open reading frames. We anticipate that the genome will provide insights into the strain’s lifestyle and the evolution of Marinobacter.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
During an investigation of the effects of a molasses spill on the taxonomic diversity of culturable bacteria in Honolulu Harbor sediment, strain X15-166BT was cultivated from sediment spread on ZoBell’s 2216E Marine Agar (MA) and incubated at 30°C. A BLAST comparison of 1,528 nucleotides of the strain’s 16S rRNA gene showed the nearest validly published neighbors (97% sequence identity) are Marinobacter maritimus CK47T from seawater off the Subantarctic Kerguelen Islands and Marinobacter psychrophilus 20041T from sea ice in the Canadian Basin (1, 2). M. maritimus grows at 4 to 37°C, while M. psychrophilus grows at 4 to 22°C. The mean annual seawater temperature at Honolulu is ~26°C (NOAA). Preliminary data suggest that X15-166BT grows on MA up to ~37°C.
The genus Marinobacter hosts 40 species cultivated from marine and other saline habitats and is considered ubiquitous in the ocean (2–5). Marinobacter species have also been described as “opportunitrophs” able to survive under a range of conditions (6, 7). Since strain X15-166BT appears on the basis of 16S rRNA gene nucleotide identity to be a novel Marinobacter species, we chose to sequence the strain’s genome to determine if it also has features that would enable survival in diverse habitats, e.g., phosphonate metabolism, acquisition of iron, or utilization of different terminal electron acceptors, such as one would find at different depths in marine sediments (5, 8).
Genomic DNA was isolated using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, USA) with additional cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). Roche 454 GS FLX+ pyrosequencing generated 54.5 Mb of shotgun sequences and 55.3 Mb 8-kb paired-end sequences. Newbler 2.8 assembled the reads into 4 scaffolds containing 3,490,661 bp (scaffold N50, 3,483,170 bp), comprising 27 contigs (contig N50, 269.4 kb). Of the assembled bases, 99.82% have a base accuracy quality value above the Phred quality score of Q40. The genome’s G+C content is 59.7%.
The genome was annotated in the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP), the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) server, and Prokka 1.11 (9–12). PGAP identified 3,115 protein-coding genes, 43 tRNA-coding regions, and 110 pseudogenes. RAST identified 3,343 protein-coding open reading frames, 42 tRNA-coding regions, and 456 subsystems. RAST predicted that 20 proteins are phage components. RAST and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) identified the flagellar assembly system and chemotaxis system, and KEGG further predicted a two-component system involved in twitching motility, suggesting that Marinobacter sp. X15-166BT can switch between flagellum-mediated swimming and pili-mediated twitching. Unlike in the genome of Marinobacter aquaeolei VT8 (a heterotypic synonym for Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus SP17) (13, 14), in which 18 proteins were predicted to be involved in the siderophore subsystem, no such biosynthesis subsystem was identified in the genome of X15-166BT. However, siderophore-dependent iron acquisition ABC transporters, including FhuB, FhuC, and FhuX, and the siderophore-independent ferric uptake system, FbpABC (15), were predicted in X15-166BT by BLASTP (E < 1e−10), suggesting that X15-166BT may have lost the siderophore biosynthesis pathway and be a “cheater” that takes up others’ siderophores (16). The genome of this putative new species will provide insights into the lifestyle of X15-166BT and the evolution of Marinobacter.
Accession number(s).
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession number MEIY00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, MEIY01000000. The 16S rRNA gene nucleotide sequence has been deposited at GenBank under accession number KX808654.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by Advanced Studies in Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics at the University of Hawai‘I at Mānoa.
Footnotes
Citation Wan X, Hou S, Burns SL, Saito JA, Donachie SP. 2016. Draft genome sequence of a novel Marinobacter sp. strain from Honolulu Harbor, Hawai’i. Genome Announc 4(6):e01354-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01354-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Shivaji S, Gupta P, Chaturvedi P, Suresh K, Delille D. 2005. Marinobacter maritimus sp. nov., a psychrotolerant strain isolated from seawater off the subantarctic Kerguelen Islands. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1453–1456. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63478-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang DC, Li HR, Xin YH, Chi ZM, Zhou PJ, Yu Y. 2008. Marinobacter psychrophilus sp. nov., a psychrophilic bacterium isolated from the Arctic. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:1463–1466 doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65690-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gauthier MJ, Lafay B, Christen R, Fernandez L, Acquaviva M, Bonin P, Bertrand JC. 1992. Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new, extremely halotolerant, hydrocarbon-degrading marine bacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol 42:568–576. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-4-568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bagheri M, Amoozegar MA, Didari M, Makhdoumi-Kakhki A, Schumann P, Spröer C, Sánchez-Porro C, Ventosa A. 2013. Marinobacter persicus sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium from a saline lake in Iran. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 104:47–54. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-9923-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Singer E, Webb EA, Nelson WC, Heidelberg JF, Ivanova N, Pati A, Edwards KJ. 2011. Genomic potential of Marinobacter aquaeolei, a biogeochemical “opportunitroph.” Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2763–2771. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01866-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Polz MF, Hunt DE, Preheim SP, Weinreich DM. 2006. Patterns and mechanisms of genetic and phenotypic differentiation in marine microbes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361:2009–2021. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kaye JZ, Sylvan JB, Edwards KJ, Baross JA. 2011. Halomonas and Marinobacter ecotypes from hydrothermal vent, subseafloor, and deep-sea environments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 75:123–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00984.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Villarreal-Chiu JF, Quinn JP, McGrath JW. 2012. The genes and enzymes of phosphonate metabolism by bacteria, and their distribution in the marine environment. Front Microbiol 3:19. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Angiuoli SV, Gussman A, Klimke W, Cochrane G, Field D, Garrity G, Kodira CD, Kyrpides N, Madupu R, Markowitz V, Tatusova T, Thomson N, White O. 2008. Toward an online repository of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for (meta) genomic annotation. OMICS 12:137–141. doi: 10.1089/omi.2008.0017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Grimaud R, Ghiglione JF, Cagnon C, Lauga B, Vaysse PJ, Rodriguez-Blanco A, Mangenot S, Cruveiller S, Barbe V, Duran R, Wu LF, Talla E, Bonin P, Michotey V. 2012. Genome sequence of the marine bacterium Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus SP17, which forms biofilms on hydrophobic organic compounds. J Bacteriol 194:3539–3540. doi: 10.1128/JB.00500-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Márquez MC, Ventosa A. 2005. Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus Gauthier et al. 1992 and Marinobacter aquaeolei Nguyen et al. 1999 are heterotypic synonyms. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1349–1351. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63591-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Amin SA, Green DH, Al Waheeb D, Gärdes A, Carrano CJ. 2012. Iron transport in the genus Marinobacter. Biometals 25:135–147. doi: 10.1007/s10534-011-9491-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cordero OX, Ventouras L-A, DeLong EF, Polz MF. 2012. Public good dynamics drive evolution of iron acquisition strategies in natural bacterioplankton populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:20059–20064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213344109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]