Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2004 Sep;48(9):3556–3558. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.9.3556-3558.2004

SRI-286, a Thiosemicarbazole, in Combination with Mefloquine and Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Murine Mycobacterium avium Complex Disease

Luiz E Bermudez 1,2,3,*, Peter Kolonoski 1, Lianne E Seitz 4, Mary Petrofsky 1, Robert Reynolds 4, Martin Wu 1,2, Lowell S Young 1
PMCID: PMC514788  PMID: 15328125

Abstract

Treatment of Mycobacterium avium disease remains challenging when macrolide resistance develops. We infected C57 beige mice and treated them with mefloquine, SRI-286, and moxifloxacin. SRI-286 (80 mg/kg) was bactericidal in the liver. Mefloquine plus moxifloxacin or mefloquine plus SRI-286 were better than mefloquine alone.


Organisms of the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) are a common cause of bacteremia and disseminated disease in patients in advanced stages of AIDS (9, 13). Currently, only a limited number of compounds, such as macrolides (azithromycin and clarithromycin), amikacin, and ethambutol, have demonstrated therapeutic activity against M. avium in humans. The emergence of macrolide resistance and drug interactions between rifamycins and protease inhibitors emphasizes the need for additional compounds with anti-M. avium activity.

Mefloquine (MFQ; a derivative of 4-quinoline-methanol) is an antimicrobial agent widely used for prophylaxis of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria (7). It has been demonstrated to have anti-M. avium activity in an experimental mouse model (MIC of 16 μg/ml) (2, 3). Moxifloxacin (MXF) is a fluoroquinolone with activity against a wide range of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis (11). Recently, we have shown that MXF is active against M. avium in the beige mouse model (MIC of 4 μg/ml) (1). Thiacetazone is a thiosemicarbazole antimicrobial agent that has been widely used for therapy of tuberculosis. SRI-286, a thiosemicarbazole analog, also has good activity against M. avium both in vitro and in vivo (MIC of 2 μg/ml) (4). In vivo, SRI-286 has been shown to be bacteriostatic against M. avium (4). In contrast, thiacetazone, the parent compound, has no effect on M. avium in mice (4). Although thiacetazone has a synergistic effect with isoniazid against M. tuberculosis, neither of the single compounds is active against M. avium (2, 4, 9). We now extend our previous observation to evaluate the effect of SRI-286 in combination with MFQ and MXF, two compounds with activity in vivo against M. avium (1, 3).

Mycobacteria.

MAC 101 is a well-characterized human isolate that is susceptible to macrolides and has been used in many previous in vivo studies (1, 4). M. avium organisms were cultured on Middlebrook 7H11 agar (BBL) supplemented with oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (Hardy Diagnostics) for 10 days at 37°C. Transparent colony morphotypes were harvested and suspended in Hanks' buffered salt solution to a concentration of 3 × 108 CFU/ml for murine challenge. The inoculum was confirmed by colony plating onto 7H11 agar.

Antibiotics.

Antimicrobial preparations for therapy were made by suspending the agent with 2.5% gum arabic (Sigma) in 0.2% Tween 80 (Sigma). MFQ was purchased from the hospital pharmacy with a prescription. SRI-286 was provided by the Southern Research Institute (Birmingham, Ala.). MXF was provided by Bayer AG.

Experimental design.

C57BL/6J-bgj/bgj female mice, aged 8 to 10 weeks, were obtained from Jackson Laboratories for challenge studies. Mice were infected through the caudal vein with 3 × 107 CFU of MAC 101. After 7 days, all mice were bled for quantitative blood culture to ensure an adequate baseline level of infection. Treatment was then initiated with MFQ at 40 mg/kg, SRI-286 at 40 or 80 mg/kg, or MXF at 100 mg/kg daily as oral monotherapy; all permutations of two-drug therapy; or all three drugs in combination. Each treatment group contained at least 12 evaluable animals. In addition, an experimental group of 10 mice was harvested after 7 days of infection in order to establish a baseline level of infection in tissues. Animals were then treated daily for an additional 4 weeks and then euthanized after allowing 2 days without therapy to reduce carryover. In the original work (3), it was determined that there was no carryover effect. The livers and spleens of all of the mice were aseptically dissected, weighed, and homogenized in 5 ml of 7H9 broth containing 20% glycerol. Tissue suspensions were serially diluted and plated onto 7H11 agar plates to quantitate viable organisms. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 10 days.

We defined bactericidal activity as a reduction in the number of bacteria in the liver and spleen after 4 weeks of treatment (5 weeks) to a number smaller than the number of bacteria in those organs prior to treatment (control at 1 week). One also needs to consider that once a drug decreases the number of viable bacteria, the host immune system would participate in the control of the infection.

Statistical analysis.

The statistical significance of the difference between tissue bacterial loads was assessed by analyses of variance. Differences between experimental groups were considered significant at the P < 0.05 level.

Treatment of mice with MFQ alone resulted in bactericidal activity in 5 weeks. These results agree with previously published information demonstrating that MFQ is bactericidal for M. avium in both the liver and the spleen (3, 7). MXF at 100 mg/kg had bacteriostatic activity against M. avium, which has been observed previously (1). SRI-286 at 40 mg/kg, a dose comparable to the dose of thiacetazone in mice, was bacteriostatic, with activity comparable to that of MXF. When administered at 80 mg/kg/day, it had bactericidal activity in the liver and bacteriostatic activity in the spleen (Table 1). No toxicity was revealed by visual observation of the mice.

TABLE 1.

Activities of MFQ, MXF, and SRI-286 alone or in combination against M. avium

Regimen (dose [mg/kg]) n Mean no. of CFU/g ± SEM
Liver Spleen
MFQ (40) 19 (5.2 ± 1.6) × 107ab (1.2 ± 0.4) × 108ab
MXF (100) 13 (1.5 ± 0.2) × 108b (7.0 ± 1.0) × 108b
SRI-286 (40) 18 (1.1 ± 0.2) × 108b (5.1 ± 0.8) × 108b
SRI-286 (80) 16 (5.1 ± 1.1) × 107b (2.1 ± 0.2) × 108b
MFQ (40) + SRI-286 (40) 14 (2.5 ± 0.9) × 107abc (5.6 ± 2.1) × 107abc
MFQ (40) + SRI-286 (80) 12 (8.8 ± 2.4) × 106abc (1.6 ± 0.4) × 107abc
MFQ (40) + MXF (100) 14 (9.2 ± 2.8) × 106ab (1.4 ± 0.8) × 107ab
MXF (100) + SRI-286 (40) 12 (5.6 ± 1.2) × 107b (1.1 ± 0.2) × 108b
MXF (100) + SRI-286 (80) 13 (3.8 ± 0.9) × 107ab (6.0 ± 1.9) × 107ab
MFQ (40) + MXF (100) + SRI-286 (40) 15 (1.2 ± 0.4) × 107abc (2.4 ± 0.9) × 107abc
MFQ (40) + MXF (100) + SRI-286 (80) 12 (9.5 ± 3.4) × 106abc (2.9 ± 1.3) × 107abc
5-week control 14 (9.8 ± 1.6) × 108 (4.7 ± 0.8) × 109
1-week control 10 (8.5 ± 1.0) × 107 (2.4 ± 0.3) × 108
a

P < 0.05 compared to 1-week control.

b

P < 0.05 compared to 5-week control.

c

P < 0.05 compared to both drugs alone.

Combination of MFQ with SRI-286 significantly improved the anti-M. avium activity of MFQ and SRI-286 alone. Combination with SRI-286 at 80 mg/kg was superior to treatment with the combination with SRI-286 at 40 mg/kg and resulted in a 1-log reduction in the liver and spleen compared with the control prior to treatment. Combination of MFQ with MXF was associated with results similar to those of the combination of MFQ and SRI-286 at 80 mg/kg. MXF and SRI-286 at either 40 or 80 mg/kg/day resulted in a significant decrease in the load of bacteria in the liver and spleen, compared with MXF or SRI-286 alone (Table 1). The combination of the three drugs was not more active than the combination of MFQ and MXF or MFQ and SRI-286 (Table 1). Our results confirm previous observations that MFQ is bactericidal alone and when combined with other compounds.

Infections caused by the MAC are difficult to treat, and only regimens containing macrolides or azalides have been shown to be effective (6, 12, 15). More recently, we have shown that in mice the combination of MFQ, MXF, and ethambutol was as effective as the macrolide- and azalide-containing regimens (2). In fact, it was the first time that an alternative to a macrolide-containing regimen was proposed.

Now, we have shown that a regimen consisting of MFQ, MXF, and SRI-286 is also as active as macrolide-containing regimens against M. avium (8, 10). Although no side-by-side comparison was performed, we have experience of more than 70 experiments using macrolide therapy. SRI-286 is bacteriostatic against M. avium, while thiacetazone has no activity (4). Thiacetazone, however, is bacteriostatic against M. tuberculosis but is synergistic with isoniazid (5). It appears that SRI-286, when combined with MFQ, had an increasing effect on M. avium.

The triple regimen may be superior to the combination of two compounds because of the smaller chance that antibiotic resistance will develop. It can also be an alternative to treat infections resistant to a macrolide-containing regimen or for patients who cannot tolerate macrolide therapy.

One of the unknown aspects of the MFQ regimen is whether the drug would be well tolerated. When MFQ is used for prophylaxis of P. falciparum malaria, it is administered once a week. Almost certainly, for the treatment of M. avium infection, more frequent doses will be required. Recently, a report of a case of M. avium infection successfully treated with MFQ has been published (14). No side effects were observed (14). The definitive answer to this question awaits future studies with humans.

MFQ may also have another advantage in the treatment of M. avium infection. Thus far, despite trying several strategies, no resistant clone has been identified by attempting induction in vitro, by treating mice for 12 weeks, and by chemical mutagenesis (unpublished data), which suggests that the drug target in M. avium might be a lethal target or may indicate that killing does not occur by a simple mode of action. Future studies will attempt to address this possibility.

Acknowledgments

We thank Karen Allen and Denny Weber for preparing the manuscript. We are also indebted to Chris Lambros for helpful discussions during this work.

This research was supported by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases contract NO1-AI-25104.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bermudez, L. E., C. B. Inderlied, P. Kolonoski, M. Petrofsky, P. Aralar, M. Wu, and L. S. Young. 2001. Activity of moxifloxacin by itself and in combination with ethambutol, rifabutin, and azithromycin in vitro and in vivo against Mycobacterium avium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:217-222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bermudez, L. E., P. Kolonoski, M. Petrofsky, M. Wu, C. B. Inderlied, and L. S. Young. 2003. Mefloquine, moxifloxacin, and ethambutol are a triple-drug alternative to macrolide-containing regimens for treatment of Mycobacterium avium disease. J. Infect. Dis. 187:1977-1980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bermudez, L. E., P. Kolonoski, M. Wu, P. A. Aralar, C. B. Inderlied, and L. S. Young. 1999. Mefloquine is active in vitro and in vivo against Mycobacterium avium complex. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1870-1874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bermudez, L. E., R. Reynolds, P. Kolonoski, P. Aralar, C. B. Inderlied, and L. S. Young. 2003. Thiosemicarbazole (thiacetazone-like) compound with activity against Mycobacterium avium in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:2685-2687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chaisson, R. E., C. A. Benson, M. P. Dube, L. B. Heifets, J. A. Korvick, S. Elkin, T. Smith, J. C. Craft, and F. R. Sattler. 1994. Clarithromycin therapy for bacteremic Mycobacterium avium complex disease. A randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study in patients with AIDS. Ann. Intern. Med. 121:905-911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Council, E. A. B. 1963. Thiacetazone investigation: isoniazid with thiacetazone in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in East Africa. Tubercle 44:301-333. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Croft, A. M., T. C. Clayton, and M. J. World. 1997. Side effects of mefloquine prophylaxis for malaria: an independent randomized controlled trial. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 91:199-203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fernandes, P. B., D. J. Hardy, D. McDaniel, C. W. Hanson, and R. N. Swanson. 1989. In vitro and in vivo activities of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33:1531-1534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Inderlied, C. B., C. A. Kemper, and L. E. Bermudez. 1993. The Mycobacterium avium complex. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 6:266-310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Inderlied, C. B., P. T. Kolonoski, M. Wu, and L. S. Young. 1989. In vitro and in vivo activity of azithromycin (CP 62,993) against the Mycobacterium avium complex. J. Infect. Dis. 159:994-997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ji, B., N. Lounis, C. Maslo, C. Truffot-Pernot, P. Bonnafous, and J. Grosset. 1998. In vitro and in vivo activities of moxifloxacin and clinafloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2066-2069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jones, D., and D. V. Havlir. 2002. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in the HIV infected patient. Clin. Chest Med. 23:665-674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McGarvey, J., and L. E. Bermudez. 2002. Pathogenesis of nontuberculous mycobacteria infections. Clin. Chest Med. 23:569-583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nannini, E. C., M. Keating, P. Binstock, G. Samonis, and D. P. Kontoyiannis. 2002. Successful treatment of refractory disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection with the addition of linezolid and mefloquine. J. Infect. 44:201-203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Young, L. S., L. Wiviott, M. Wu, P. Kolonoski, R. Bolan, and C. B. Inderlied. 1991. Azithromycin for treatment of Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex infection in patients with AIDS. Lancet 338:1107-1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES