Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016 Sep 15;60(12):2642–2653. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201600170

Polymorphisms in stearoyl CoA desaturase and sterol regulatory element binding protein interact with N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake to modify associations with anthropometric variables and metabolic phenotypes in Yup'ik people

Dominick J Lemas 1,2, Yann C Klimentidis 3, Stella Aslibekyan 4, Howard W Wiener 4, Diane M O’Brien 1, Scarlett E Hopkins 1, Kimber L Stanhope 5,6, Peter J Havel 5,6, David B Allison 7,8,9, Jose R Fernandez 8,10, Hemant K Tiwari 7, Bert B Boyer 1,*
PMCID: PMC5148654  NIHMSID: NIHMS809450  PMID: 27467133

Abstract

Scope

n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) intake is associated with protection from obesity, however, the mechanisms of protection remain poorly characterized. The stearoyl CoA desaturase (SCD), insulin sensitive glucose transporter (SLC2A4), and sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBF1) genes are transcriptionally regulated by n-3 PUFA intake and harbor polymorphisms associated with obesity. The present study investigated how consumption of n-3 PUFA modifies associations between SCD, SLC2A4, and SREBF1 polymorphisms and anthropometric variables and metabolic phenotypes.

Materials and Methods

Anthropometric variables and metabolic phenotypes were measured in a cross-sectional sample of Yup’ik individuals (n=1135) and thirty-three polymorphisms were tested for main effects and interactions using linear models that account for familial correlations. n-3 PUFA intake was estimated using red blood cell nitrogen stable isotope ratios. SCD polymorphisms were associated with ApoA1 concentration and n-3 PUFA interactions with SCD polymorphisms were associated with reduced fasting cholesterol levels and waist-to-hip ratio. SLC2A4 polymorphisms were associated with hip circumference, high-density lipoprotein and ApoA1 concentrations. SREBF1 polymorphisms were associated with low-density lipoprotein and HOMA-IR and n-3 PUFA interactions were associated with reduced fasting insulin and HOMA-IR levels.

Conclusion

These results suggest that an individual’s genotype may interact with dietary n-3 PUFAs in ways that are associated with protection from obesity-related diseases in Yup’ik people.

Keywords: δ15N, BMI, Alaska Native, gene-by-environment interactions, rs11190480, rs2167444, rs5415, rs5435, CANHR, n-3 PUFA

1 INTRODUCTION

Accumulation of excess body fat increases the risk of developing type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [1]. However, there are subgroups of “healthy obese” individuals that appear to carry excess body fat without developing adverse sequelae [2, 3]. Current understanding of the interplay of genetic and environmental factors in the “healthy obese” phenotypes remains limited despite its potential to offer valuable mechanistic insights into obesity-related diseases.

Consumption of n-3 PUFAs, namely eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acids (DHA), is associated with phenotypes consistent with “healthy obesity,” including reduced incidence of diabetes [4], reduced adiposity [5], and improvement in fasting lipids [6]. Among Yup’ik people living in Southwest Alaska, we have previously reported that a traditional Yup’ik diet is enriched with EPA and DHA and associated with lower triglyceride levels [7, 8], reduced C-reactive protein levels [9], elevated HDL-cholesterol levels [7], reduced blood pressure, and elevated adiponectin levels, suggestive of increased insulin sensitivity [8]. Importantly, the average BMI (28.0 kg/m2) in this Yup’ik study population is similar to the average BMI (27.0 kg/m2) in the National Health and Nutritional Examination (NHANES) III survey [10]; however, the prevalence of T2DM in Yup’ik people is considerably lower (3-4%) [11, 12] than the general U.S. population (8.3%) [13]. Given the chronic high intake of n-3 PUFA observed among mostly older Yup’ik people (20 times greater than the current mean intake of the general US population [14, 15]) accumulating evidence suggests that n-3 PUFA intake may be a critical environmental exposure that contributes to the “healthy obesity” phenotype observed in Yup’ik people.

The mechanisms underlying the protective effects of n-3 PUFAs on obesity and cardiometabolic health include, among others, changes in expression of stearoyl CoA desaturase (SCD) [16, 17], transcription factor sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBF1) [18] , and insulin sensitive glucose transporter (SLC2A4, also commonly referenced as GLUT4 [19]. SCD is the rate-controlling enzyme catalyzing the biosynthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) from saturated fatty acid substrates [20]. In mice, Scd1 (mouse SCD homolog) deficiency was associated with increased energy expenditure [21], reduced adiposity [22], increased insulin sensitivity [23], protection against hypertriglyceridemia [24], and with elevated HDL-cholesterol levels [24]. On the other hand, the gene product of SLC2A4 is the rate-limiting step in skeletal muscle glucose uptake [25] and targeted disruption of Slc2a4 in mice- through selective knockout in muscle tissue- results in severe insulin resistance and glucose intolerance from an early age [26]. Finally, SREBF1 is a transcription factor that plays a critical role in energy homeostasis by promoting glycolysis, lipogenesis, and adipogenesis [27]. Srebf1 over-expression in animal models results in insulin resistance through over-accumulation of lipid/lipoprotein substrates [28].

Whole-genome linkage studies in humans have implicated SCD, SLC2A4, and SREBF1 as obesity candidate genes [2931] and genetic polymorphisms in these genes have been associated with metabolic syndrome [32], obesity [33, 34], T2DM [35, 36], and cholesterol metabolism [3739]. Moreover, a clinical trial demonstrated that the effects of dietary n-3 PUFA supplementation on cardiometabolic health may vary by SCD [40] as well as SREBF1 genotype [41]. Taken together, we hypothesize that genetic variation in SCD, SLC2A4, and SREBF1 may partially explain the association between n-3 PUFA intake and “healthy obesity” observed in Yup’ik people. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to test genetic polymorphisms in SCD, SLC2A4 and SREBF1 for association with anthropometric variables, T2DM, and fasting lipid phenotypes in a study population of Yup’ik people and evaluate whether these associations are modified by a traditional diet enriched with n-3 PUFAs.

2 MATERIALS ANDMETHODS

2.1 PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Recruitment of Yup’ik participants was initiated in 2003 and continues in 11 Southwest Alaska communities. Participants signed informed-consent documents before entering the study using protocols that were approved by the University of Alaska Institutional Review Board, the National and Alaska Area Indian Health Service Institutional Review Boards, and the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation Human Studies Committee. Data on familial relationships used in this study to generate pedigrees were obtained through self-report at the time participants were enrolled in the CANHR study. Summary statistics specific to characteristics of the Yup’ik pedigree were calculated using PEDINFO in the Statistical Analysis for Genetic Epidemiology (S.A.G.E., 2009) software.

2.2 ANTHROPOMETRIC AND BIOCHEMICAL MEASUREMENT

Trained staff obtained height, weight and 4 circumferences (waist, hip, triceps, and thigh) measurements using protocols from the NHANES III Anthropometric Procedures Manual [42] as previously described [43]. Percent body fat (PBF) was measured by electrical bioimpedance using a Tanita TBF-300A body fat analyzer (Tanita Corp, Arlington Heights, IL, U.S.A.). Blood samples were collected from participants after an overnight fast, and lipoproteins including total cholesterol, HDL-, LDL-, and VLDL- cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1, and plasma triglycerides concentrations were assayed as previously described [43]. From blood samples, we also measured fasting insulin (FI), blood glucose (FG), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and calculated HOMA-IR (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance) and HOMA-B (homeostatic model assessment of beta-cell function) as described previously [44]. Finally, we defined a continuous variable called ‘FG & HbA1c’ that is described in greater detail along with information on participant medications within the Supporting Information Methods S1.

2.3 BIOMARKER FOR MARINE n-3 PUFA INTAKE

n-3 PUFA intake was assessed using the nitrogen stable isotope ratio (δ15N) of red blood cells (RBC), which has been validated as a biomarker for EPA and DHA intake as previously described [45]. The time to 50% turnover of RBC is approximately 45 days [46], therefore, the mean RBC δ15N values reflect a mean n-3 PUFA intake over 1.5 months. Isotope ratios are analyzed relative to IAEA-certified reference materials calibrated to atmospheric nitrogen, for which 15N/14N = 0.0036765. By convention and for ease of interpretation, isotope ratios are presented as delta values in “permil” relative to atmospheric nitrogen: δ15N = [(15N/14Nsample – 15N/14Nstandard)/( 15N/14Nstandard)] · 1000‰. The range of isotopic variation in our dataset (9‰) was very large relative to analytical precision (within 0.2‰). We hereafter refer to the nitrogen stable isotope ratio of red blood cells (RBC) as δ15N.

2.4 SNP GENOTYPING

Our final genotyping list included 13 SNPs in SCD, 13 SNPs in SLC2A4, and 8 SNPs in SREBF1 that were genotyped using the Sequenom iPLEX platform at the Broad Institute [47]. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) among SNPs in each gene was calculated from haplotype frequencies estimated using the hapfreq command in the FBAT program [48]. We used pair-wise r-squared (r2) as the metric of LD and limited presentation of haplotypes to those with >5% frequency. Information on SNP selection is presented in Supporting Information Methods S2 and a description of the primers for SNP 12 and SNP 13 in SLC2A4 is presented in Supporting Information Table 1.

2.5 ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS

Each SNP was tested for association with anthropometric variables, lipid/lipoprotein, and T2DM-related phenotypes using the program ASSOC [49] in the S.A.G.E software package. Each SNP included in the analysis was coded as additive by default (defined as the number of minor alleles); however when fewer than 10% of the individuals genotyped for a given SNP were homozygous for the minor allele- we coded the SNPs as dominant (defined as two copies of the major allele compared to at least one copy of the minor allele). Likelihood ratio statistics were calculated to compare 3 nested models and test the null hypothesis of no association between SNPs and outcomes after adjusting for covariates.

Model 1 included baseline covariates (age, sex, community membership) and δ15N; Model 2 included baseline covariates, δ15N, and SNP to test for main genetic effect; Model 3 included baseline covariates, the genetic effect of SNPs, δ15N, and interactions between the genetic effect and δ15N. Note that model 3 is the only model to directly test gene-diet interactions under the null hypothesis between continuous δ15N and ordinal SNP genotypes. Additionally, lipid/lipoprotein and T2DM-related phenotypes included BMI and medication use as baseline covariates in Model 1, 2 and 3. We treated each phenotype being tested as representing a separate family of null hypotheses and correct for the number of tests within each family [50]. P-values were compared to the conventional significance threshold (p<0.05, 2-tailed), as well as significance thresholds adjusted for multiple test correction. Multiple test correction in this study was calculated according to the number of non-redundant SNPs with MAF ≥0.05 for SCD (7 tests; α≤0.007), SLC2A4 (6 tests; α≤0.008), and SREBF1 (4 tests; α≤0.013) using spectral decomposition of LD matrices [51].

Estimates of effect size (β) were extracted from linear models adjusted for demographic and environmental covariates. Statistical power that accounted for familial correlations [51] was assessed using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The general estimates of power in our sample using an additive genetic model at α = 0.005 for detecting the effect sizes (β) in transformed phenotypes (i.e. BMI) between 0.1 and 1.5 were >90% when the minor allele frequency was at least 5%. Additional information on data management, statistical analyses and multiple test correction can be found in Supporting Information Methods S3 and S4.

3 RESULTS

3.1 CHARACTERISTICS OF YUP’IK PARTICIPANTS

Our study population of 1135 non-pregnant Yup’ik participants represents 195 pedigrees with a mean pedigree size of 5.82 individuals (Table 1). In general, Yup’ik women had significantly greater levels of adiposity (BMI, PBF, and HC) and higher fasting total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and ApoA1 concentrations relative to Yup’ik men (p<0.0001). Additionally, Yup’ik women had significantly higher FI, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-B, and significantly lower waist-to-hip ratio and FG. Thirteen individuals reported taking T2DM-related medication and 55 individuals reported taking lipid/lipoprotein medications.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of Yup'ik participantsa,b

Variables Women Men p-values
No. of participants 597 538

Age (yrs) 40.5 (38.1 - 42.6) 38.8 (37.8 - 39.8) 0.1271


Anthropometric Variables

BMI (kg/m2) 28.9 (28.1 - 29.8) 26.4 (26.0 - 26.8) <0.0001

Percentage Body Fat (%) 43.1 (41.8 - 44.4) 28.0 (27.4 - 28.6) <0.0001

Waist Circumference (cm) 88.4 (86.5 - 90.4) 87.8 (86.8 - 88.8) 0.4456

Hip Circumference (cm) 105.8 (104.3 - 107.4) 98.9 (98.2 - 98.7) <0.0001

Thigh Circumference (cm) 51.2 (50.5 - 51.9) 50.4 (50.0 - 50.8) 0.0101

Waist-to-Hip Ratio 0.86 (0.86 – 0.87) 0.92 (0.91 – 0.92) <0.0001


Lipid/lipoprotein Measures

Cholesterol (mg/dL) 215.4 (209.1 - 221.9) 205.8 (202.6 - 209.1) <0.0001

HDL (mg/dL) 66.2 (63.8 - 68.8) 56.8 (55.7 - 58.0) <0.0001

Apolipoprotein A-I (mg/dL) 175.9 (172.1 - 179.9) 162.9 (168.0 - 165.0) <0.0001

LDL (mg/dL) 130.2 (125.2 - 135.3) 130 (127.2 - 132.8) 0.9090

VLDL (mg/dL) 15.2 (14.3 - 16.1) 15.2 (14.7 - 15.7) 0.9720

Triglyceride (mg/dL) 75.6 (71.4 - 80.1) 74.3 (71.9 - 76.9) 0.5029


Diabetes-Related Measures

Fasting glucose (mg/dL) 90.2 (88.9 -91.6) 92.2 (91.5 - 93.0) 0.0007

HbA1c (%) 5.36 (5.31 - 5.41) 5.42 (5.40 - 5.45) 0.0049

HOMA-B 232.6 (215.5 - 249.6) 189.2 (180.9 - 197.5) <0.0001

HOMA-IR 3.9 (3.5 - 4.2) 3.4 (3.3 - 3.6) 0.0049

Fasting insulin (μU/ml) 15.3 (14.3 - 16.3) 13.4 (13.0 - 14.0) <0.0001
a

Values are reported as mean (95% CI) predicted from linear model accounting for familial correlations among 195 pedigrees with a mean pedigree size of 5.82 individuals (range, 1-893).

b

p-values for differences by gender are derived using student t-test.

3.2 DISTRIBUTION OF δ15N IN STUDY POPULATION

Summary statistics for δ15N, our biomarker of n-3 PUFA intake, are grouped by gender and reported in Table 2. The overall mean δ15N value in this study was 9.0‰, and ranged from 6.2‰ to 15.2‰. According to the linear relationship between RBC δ15N and RBC EPA described elsewhere for this cohort [45], the corresponding mean EPA (%RBC fatty acids) was 2.6%. The standard deviation of δ15N in this sample did not differ according to gender (1.5‰ for both females and males).

Table 2.

Distribution of the RBC nitrogen stable isotope ratio (δ15N) in Yup'ik peoplea,b Total Women Men

Total Women Men
No. of participants 1135 597 538

Mean ± SD (‰) 9.0 ± 1.5 9.1 ± 1.5 8.8 ± 1.5

Maximum 15.2 15.2 13.5

Minimum 6.2 6.4 6.2

Range (‰) 9 8.8 7.3
a

Isotope ratios are presented as delta values in “permil” relative to atmospheric nitrogen: δ15N = [(15N/14Nsample - 15N/14Nstandard)/( 15N/14Nstandard)] · 1000‰.

b

The relationship between δ15N and EPA follows the linear model: EPA (%RBC fatty acid) =1.04 · δ15N - 6.7‰, as previously described for this population [45].

3.3 GENETIC VARIATION IN SCD, SLC2A4, AND SREBF1

A comprehensive list of thirty-four SNPs in SCD, SLC2A4 and SREBF1 were genotyped in 1135 Yup’ik participants with a mean genotyping success rate of 93.2% (range 81.2-99.4%). The rs41290540 SNP in SCD (MAF=0.12) was the only polymorphism with MAF ≥0.05 that deviated significantly from HWE proportions (p=0.0002) and was therefore excluded from the analysis. The genetic analyses in this study included the 23 SNPs with MAF ≥ 0.05 that did not deviate from HWE proportions (Table 3). Two SNPs (rs11557927 and 2282180) in the analysis were coded as dominant. We have limited the presentation and discussion of the results below to those tests that were statistically significant; however, all tabular results for SNP association, gene-diet interactions, and pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) results are presented in Supporting Information Tables 2-8.

Table 3.

SCD, SLC2A4, and SREBF1 polymorphisms with MAF ≥0.05

Gene Chra Position
(bp)
SNP #b SNPc Alleled MAFe Genotypeg
N Genotyped HWE p-
valuef
Homozygous Major Heterozygous Homozygous Minor
SCD 10 102099192 1 rs1502593 G>A 0.21 747 266 26 1039 0.725
SCD 10 102100891 2 rs522951 C>G 0.34 482 470 113 1065 0.926
SCD 10 102102065 3 rs11190480 A>G 0.12 871 241 16 1128 0.897
SCD 10 102104453 4 rs3071 A>C 0.19 764 271 17 1052 0.256
SCD 10 102104997 5 rs3829160 G>A 0.34 487 473 110 1070 0.781
SCD 10 102106301 6 rs2234970 A>C 0.34 487 461 111 1059 0.917
SCD 10 102107197 7 rs599961 T>G 0.32 394 512 166 1072 0.983
SCD 10 102111552 8 rs41290540 A>C 0.12 820 255 1 1076 0.000
SCD 10 102111569 9 rs3978768 A>G 0.33 496 433 113 1042 0.263
SCD 10 102111806 10 rs11557927* T>G 0.09 769 146 7 922 0.923
SCD 10 102112593 11 rs7849 T>C 0.44 279 557 238 1074 0.257
SCD 10 102114734 12 rs2167444 T>A 0.13 799 232 17 1048 0.976

SLC2A4 17 7124086 13 rs2654185 A>C 0.31 615 386 71 1072 0.384
SLC2A4 17 7125205 14 rs5415 T>C 0.50 309 479 215 1003 0.305
SLC2A4 17 7125786 15 rs5417 C>A 0.31 616 382 69 1067 0.407
SLC2A4 17 7126746 16 rs16956647 C>T 0.15 702 326 44 1072 0.487
SLC2A4 17 7127847 17 rs5435 T>C 0.48 310 555 209 1074 0.211
SLC2A4 17 7133979 18 rs3744405 G>A 0.30 621 389 72 1082 0.356

SREBF1 17 17651995 19 rs4925114 G>A 0.37 432 497 148 1077 0.816
SREBF1 17 17656042 20 rs2297508 G>C 0.46 294 498 212 1004 0.817
SREBF1 17 17661563 21 rs2282180* G>A 0.05 963 107 2 1072 0.975
SREBF1 17 17668668 22 rs9899634 T>A 0.49 266 554 245 1065 0.629
SREBF1 17 17668768 23 rs8066560 C>A 0.44 320 554 197 1071 0.234
SREBF1 17 17674485 24 rs9902941 C>T 0.49 265 561 246 1072 0.157
a

Chromosome;

b

SNP# as displayed in linkage disequilibrium plot (Suppl. Figure 1);

c

Seattle SNPs Genome Variation Server on March 2008 (dbSNP build 126) Version 5.01;

d

Major > Minor;

e

MAF computed using FREQ in S.A.G.E.;

f

HWE p-values computed using GCC HW test that accounts for relationships among individuals [62];

g

Genotype.

*

denotes SNPs that were analyzed using a dominant model of inheritance.

3.4 ANALYSIS OF LIPID/LIPOPROTEIN PHENOTYPES

Figure 1 presents associations between SNPs in SCD, SLC2A4, and SREBF1 with MAF ≥0.05 and lipid/lipoprotein phenotypes. The solid red line represents statistical significance according to multiple test correction for each gene. Notably, rs2167444 and rs7849 in SCD were in weak LD (r2=0.11) and significantly associated with fasting plasma ApoA1 concentrations. The rs5415 and rs5435 polymorphisms in SLC2A4 were in moderate LD (r2=0.48) and significantly associated with both fasting plasma ApoA1 concentrations and HDL-cholesterol. An SREBF1 SNP (rs8066560) was significantly associated with fasting LDL-cholesterol.

Figure 1. SCD, SLC2A4 and SREBF1 polymorphisms that are associated with lipid/lipoprotein phenotypes.

Figure 1

Association of SNPs in a linear model adjusted for age, sex, lipid/lipoprotein medications, community membership, BMI, and n-3 PUFA intake. The solid red line represents statistical significance according to multiple test correction for each gene, estimated using the spectral decomposition of LD matrix [51]. The dotted red line represents nominal significance (p−640.05). Total cholesterol (Chol), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), very-low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and triglycerides (TG).

Figure 2 illustrates how n-3 PUFA intake modifies the association between rs11190480 in SCD and fasting cholesterol. Specifically, n-3 PUFA intake is positively associated with fasting cholesterol levels among all rs11190480 genotypes and this association is significantly attenuated among participants carrying both copies of the rs11190480 major allele (A/A). The mean δ15N by rs11190480 genotype are as follows: A/A—9.0‰ (95% CI: 9.0, 9.1), A/G—9.0‰ (95% CI: 8.9, 9.2), G/G—9.1‰ (95% CI: 8.6, 9.7). We did not detect any significant interactions between SNPs in SLC2A4 and SREBF1 and n-3 PUFA intake with lipid/lipoprotein phenotypes.

Figure 2. n-3 PUFA intake (δ1515N) modifies a SCD SNP associated with fasting cholesterol levels (rs11190480: p=0.007).

Figure 2

n-3 PUFA intake was positively associated (p=0.007) with fasting cholesterol levels among all rs11190480 genotypes and this association was significantly attenuated among participants carrying both copies of the rs11190480 major allele (A/A). Gene-diet interaction between continuous n-3 PUFA intake (δ15N) and categorical rs11190480 genotypes were adjusted for participant age, sex, lipid medications, community membership, BMI, and n-3 PUFA intake. The figure legend notes the SNP [major>minor] allele, the sample size, beta and p-value for each genotype stratification.

3.5 ANALYSIS OF ANTHROPOMETRIC VARIABLES

We did not detect significant associations between SCD or SREBF1 polymorphisms and anthropometric variables upon adjusting for multiple testing (Figure 3). However, three polymorphisms (rs2654185, rs5415 and rs5417) in SLC2A4 were positively correlated with hip circumference and the rs2654185 locus was also positively associated with thigh circumference. Figure 4a shows that n-3 PUFA intake is positively correlated with waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) among all rs599961 genotypes and this association is attenuated among individuals carrying at least one copy of the minor rs599961 allele (T/G and G/G). Similarly, Figure 4b shows that n-3 PUFA intake was positively correlated with WHR ratio among all rs7849 genotypes and this association was significantly attenuated among heterozygous individuals (T/C). We did not detect significant interactions between SNPs in SLC2A4 or SREBF1 and n-3 PUFA intake on anthropometric variables.

Figure 3. SCD, SLC2A4 and SREBF1 polymorphisms that are associated with anthropometric variables.

Figure 3

Association of SNPs in a linear model adjusted for age, sex, community membership, and n-3 PUFA intake. The solid red line represents statistical significance according to multiple test correction for each gene, estimated using the spectral decomposition of LD matrix [51]. The dotted red line represents nominal significance (p≤0.05). Body mass index (BMI), percent body fat (PBF), hip circumference (HC), thigh circumference (ThC), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR).

Figure 4. n-3 PUFA intake (δ15N) modifies SCD SNPs associated with waist-to-hip ratio (rs599961:p=0.006 and rs7849:p=0.007).

Figure 4

(A) n-3 PUFA intake is positively correlated with waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) among all rs599961 genotypes and this association is attenuated among individuals carrying at least one copy of the minor rs599961 allele (T/G and G/G). (B) n-3 PUFA intake was positively correlated with WHR ratio among all rs7849 genotypes and this association was significantly attenuated among heterozygous individuals (T/C). Gene-diet interaction between continuous n-3 PUFA intake (δ15N) and categorical SCD SNP (rs599961 and rs7849) genotypes were adjusted for participant age, sex, lipid medications, community membership, BMI, and n-3 PUFA intake. The figure legend notes the SNP [major>minor] allele, the sample size, beta and p-value for each genotype stratification.

3.6 ANALYSIS OF TYPE-2 DIABETES-RELATED PHENOTYPES

We did not detect SCD or SLCA24 polymorphisms significantly associated with T2D-related phenotypes upon adjustment for multiple testing (Figure 5). Importantly, we observed a SREBF1 SNP (rs2297508) that was significantly associated with HOMA-IR and detected a significant interaction between n-3 PUFA intake and rs2282180 in SREBF1 on HOMA-IR. Figure 6 shows the positive correlation between n-3 PUFA intake and HOMA-IR is notably stronger in those with at least one copy of the rs2282180 minor allele (G/A and A/A). We did not detect significant interactions between SNPs in SCD and SLC2A4 and n-3 PUFA intake on T2DM-related phenotypes.

Figure 5. SCD, SLC2A4 and SREBF1 polymorphisms that are associated with type-2 diabetes mellitus related phenotypes.

Figure 5

Association of SNPs in a linear model adjusted for age, sex, diabetes medications, community membership, BMI and n-3 PUFA intake. The solid red line represents statistical significance according to multiple test correction for each gene, estimated using the spectral decomposition of LD matrix [51]. The dotted red line represents nominal significance (p≤0.05). Fasting blood glucose (FG), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostatic model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-B), homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), fasting insulin (FI), and fasting blood glucose & glycosylated hemoglobin (FG & HbA1c). (*) denotes SNPs that were analyzed using a dominant model of inheritance.

Figure 6. n-3 PUFA intake (δ15N) modifies SREBF1 SNP association with HOMA-IR (rs2282180*: p=0.002).

Figure 6

The positive association between n-3 PUFA intake and HOMA-IR is attenuated among individuals carrying two copies of the rs2282180 major allele (G/G). Gene-diet interaction between continuous n-3 PUFA intake (δ15N) and categorical rs2282180 genotypes were adjusted for participant age, sex, community membership, BMI, and n-3 PUFA intake. The figure legend notes the SNP [major>minor] allele, the sample size, beta and p-value for each genotype stratification. (*) denotes that SNP was analyzed using dominant model of inheritance.

4 DISCUSSIONS

Our primary findings in a cross-sectional sample of Yup’ik people demonstrate genetic variations in SCD, SLC2A4, and SREBF1 were associated with fasting lipid/lipoprotein phenotypes and a traditional dietary pattern rich in n-3 PUFA intake modified the association between SCD and SREBF1 polymorphisms with anthropometric variables, circulating lipid/lipoprotein and T2DM-related phenotypes. People adhering to a traditional Yup’ik dietary pattern rich in marine mammals and fish have consume n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) at levels up to 20 times higher than in the general US population [8, 52]. Using the nitrogen stable isotope ratio (d15N) as a validated, objective measure of the traditional dietary pattern, we have shown that high levels of traditional food intake are associated with high adiponectin and a low leptin:adiponectin ratio, suggestive of increased insulin sensitivity [8]. Published findings have shown that the transition away from the Yup'ik diet is associated with an increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity, and that the prevalence of overweight and obesity in the population now mirrors that of the general U.S. population [11, 53]. At the same time, however, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (15%)[43] and T2D (3%) among Yup’ik people remains lower than in the U.S. general population [14, 15], suggesting that consumption of a traditional diet enriched with n-3 PUFAs may contribute to “healthy obesity”. The results of this study extend what is known the traditional diet enriched inn-3 PUFA and the “healthy obese” phenotype observed in Yup’ik people by demonstrating that the traditional diet rich in n-3 PUFAs is associated with anthropometric variables, circulating lipid/lipoprotein and T2DM-related phenotypes in Yup’ik people through gene-diet interactions with SCD, SLC2A4, and SREBF1 genotypes.

Previous studies that have examined SCD polymorphisms associated with obesity-related phenotypes have produced conflicting results [32, 36, 54]. Liew et al. failed to detect SCD polymorphisms associated with T2DM-related traits, BMI, or waist-hip-ratio in a large European case-control study [54]. Gong et al. reported that SCD genetic variation was positively associated with metabolic syndrome (MetS) in a Costa Rican cohort [32] and Rudkowska et al. reported that SCD genotypes in a Canadian cohort were associated with cardiometabolic risk factors alone or in combination with n-3 PUFA supplementation [40]. In contrast, Warensjö et al. reported SCD polymorphisms were associated with increased insulin sensitivity, reduced BMI and smaller waist circumference in Swedish men [33]. Our analyses did not evaluate the contribution of SCD polymorphisms to T2DM status and MetS status directly, given the historically low prevalence of both T2DM (<3%) [11] and MetS (8.6 % in men and 19.8% in women) [43] observed among Yup’ik people. Nevertheless, we investigated the association between SCD polymorphisms with four of the five traits associated with MetS (FG, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and WC) as well as additional T2DM-related phenotypes and observed the minor allele of several SCD polymorphisms were nominally associated with a modest increase in FG (rs599961) and FG & HbA1c (rs599961 and rs7849). Collectively, our results are consistent with Warensjö et al., demonstrating that SCD genetic variation was associated with reduced adiposity and suggest that SCD activity may be an important mechanism that contributes to “healthy obesity” in this population.

More recently, the rs5435 minor allele in SLC2A4 was positively associated with T2DM and fasting insulin levels in a South Indian cohort [35] and the rs2654185 minor allele was positively associated with fasting HbA1c levels in a cohort of Japanese men [36]. Our results demonstrate the SLC2A4 rs2654185 polymorphism was significantly and positively associated with hip circumference (p=0.005) and thigh circumference (p=0.008). Additionally, we found the rs5435 minor allele, previously linked to risk of T2DM [35], was significantly associated with lower fasting HDL-cholesterol (p=0.006) and ApoA1 concentrations (p=0.005). The rs5415 polymorphism in SLC2A4 was also inversely associated with fasting HDL-cholesterol (p=0.001) and ApoA1 levels (p=0.004) and positively associated with hip circumference (p=0.004). Taken together, we extend the findings of Bodhini et al. [35] and Xi et al. [36] by demonstrating SLC2A4 polymorphisms are associated with reduced fasting HDL-cholesterol levels and provide novel evidence that SLC2A4 is associated with anthropometric variables by increasing hip and thigh circumference.

In our study, we found the SREBF1 non-synonymous G952G (rs2297508) variant was significantly associated with elevated HOMA-IR levels (p=0.009) and nominally associated with elevated LDL-cholesterol levels (p=0.028) and fasting insulin levels (p=0.014). Consistent with these results, SREBF1 polymorphisms that were correlated with G952G (rs2297508) were associated with increased LDL-cholesterol (rs2282180: p=0.024 and rs8066560: p=0.012), elevated total cholesterol (rs8066560: p=0.031) and variation in fasting insulin levels (rs9899634: p=0.046, rs8066560: p=0.024 and rs9902941: p=0.027). Collectively, our results are consistent with the findings of Bouchard-Mercier et al. [41] by demonstrating that SREBF1 polymorphisms are associated with phenotypes that may impact insulin sensitivity, potentially through mechanisms that alter insulin secretion and increase lipid/lipoprotein synthesis.

Our previous work demonstrates that a traditional Yup’ik diet rich in n-3 PUFA intake is positively associated with total cholesterol, LDL, HDL and ApoA1 and inversely associated with TG in this study population having a 50-fold variation in consumption of EPA [8, 45]. Although n-3 PUFA supplementation is not always linked to a change in total plasma cholesterol levels [55], previous reports have demonstrated a significant decrease in total cholesterol and a significant increase in HDL cholesterol after fish oil supplementation [56]. In this study, we found that SCD polymorphisms were positively associated with ApoA1 and that SCD genotypes attenuated the positive associations between the traditional dietary pattern and fasting cholesterol levels (Figure 2). Furthermore, the observed positive correlation between intake of the traditional diet and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was attenuated among individuals carrying the most common rs599961 (Figure 4a) and rs7849 (Figure 4b) genotypes in SCD. An important observation made by our study demonstrates the positive correlation between intake of the traditional diet and HOMA-IR was attenuated among individuals carrying the dominant SREBF1 rs2282180 (G/G) (Figure 6). This result is supported by previous observations in a Canadian cohort that reported SREBF1 genetic variation mediates associations between fish oil supplementation and insulin sensitivity [41]. Collectively, our results suggest that relatively common genetic variants in SCD and SREBF1 (≥0.05 MAF) attenuated the positive associations between intake of a traditional diet rich in n-3 PUFAs and increases in fasting cholesterol and HbA1c levels, as well as the WHR among Yup’ik participants.

The strengths of this study include a Yup‘ik study population was ideally suited for investigations of the impact of n-3 PUFA [7, 9] and genetic factors [57, 58] on anthropometric variables, lipid/lipoprotein, and T2DM-related phenotypes given the 50-fold range of EPA consumption in this study population [45]. Our analyses also included a precise and objective measure of n-3 PUFA intake using nitrogen stable isotope ratios from red blood cells [59] and a sample size large enough to detect SNP associations and a statistical approach that accounts for familial relationships among participants [49]. Differences in results reported in the present study in comparison to other investigations may include, but are not limited to, small sample size, population stratification and differences in statistical analysis [60, 61]. The main limitation of this study was a cross-sectional experimental design that prevents the temporal order of exposures and outcomes to be determined and thus it is important to point out we are reporting only associations and causality is unclear. Additional limitations include potentially confounding factors (e.g. alcohol intake, exercise, nutrients enriched in the traditional diet in additional to n-3 PUFAs, and smoking status) that were not measured. Some of these factors have been shown to influence lipid, insulin and glucose metabolism.

In summary, the primary findings of this study demonstrate that polymorphisms within or near SCD, SLC2A4, SREBF1 are associated with anthropometric variables, lipid/lipoprotein, and T2DM-related phenotypes in a study population with widely varying n-3 PUFA intake. Moreover, our analyses revealed beneficial gene-diet interactions with SCD polymorphisms that attenuated the positive n-3 PUFA associations with fasting cholesterol levels and waist-to-hip ratio among individuals carrying the most common genotypes at those loci. Consistent with these results, we also found that n-3 PUFA intake attenuated the positive associations between SREBF1 polymorphisms with fasting HOMA-IR among individuals carrying the dominant rs2282180 genotype. Taken together, these results support our hypothesis that interactions between common SCD, SLC2A4, and SREBF1 genotypes and n-3 PUFA intake are associated with cardiometabolic phenotypes consistent with “healthy obesity”. Additional comprehensive genomic studies in longitudinal cohorts of diverse populations having variable intake of n-3 PUFAs will be necessary to replicate these findings and determine the generalizability and public health implications of our findings.

Supplementary Material

Methods
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This study was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Award R01-DK074842 (PI: B.B.B), and R01-DKO74842-02S1 (PI: B.B.B); and by National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Awards P20-RR016430 and P30-GM103325 (PI: B.B.B) and P30-DK056336 (PI: D.B.A). Y.C.K. was supported by NIH grant K01-DK095032. Some of the results presented in this paper were obtained by using the program package S.A.G.E., which is supported by a U.S. Public Health Service Resource Grant RR-03655 (PI: Robert C. Elston) from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Finally, the CANHR team would like to express our sincere appreciation to all of our study participants and their communities for welcoming us and teaching us so much about the Yup’ik way of life. Quyana!

Footnotes

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

DJL, HWW, SA, and HKT had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Conception and design of the study: H.K.T, SHE and B.B.B. Provision of study materials or participants: S.E.H., D.M.O. and B.B.B. Collection and assembly of data: SEH, and BBB. Analysis and interpretation of the data: D.J.L, Y.C.K, S.A, H.W.W, D.M.O, S.E.H, K.L.S, P.J.H, D.B.A, J.R.F, H.K.T, and B.B.B. Statistical expertise: D.J.L, Y.C.K, S.A, H.W.W, D.M.O, D.B.A, J.R.F, and H.K.T. Drafting of the manuscript: D.J.L, Y.C.K, S.A, H.K.T, and B.B.B. Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: D.J.L, Y.C.K, S.A, H.W.W, D.M.O, S.E.H, K.L.S, P.J.H, D.B.A, J.R.F, H.K.T, and B.B.B. All authors were involved in writing the paper and had final approval of the submitted and published versions.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Dr. Allison has received, anticipates, or has had financial interests with the Frontiers Foundation; University of Wisconsin; University of Arizona; Paul Weiss, Wharton & Garrison LLP; and Sage Publications. No other co-authors on this manuscript declare conflict of interest.

5 REFERENCES

  • [1].Ogden CL, Yanovski SZ, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. The Epidemiology of Obesity. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2087–2102. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Blüher M, Blu M. The distinction of metabolically “healthy” from “unhealthy” obese individuals. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2010;21:38–43. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283346ccc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Health P, Avenue MP, Wildman RP. Healthy obesity. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2009;12:438–443. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32832c6db7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Virtanen JK, Mursu J, Voutilainen S, Uusitupa M, et al. Serum omega-3 polyunsaturated Fatty acids and risk of incident type 2 diabetes in men: the kuopio ischemic heart disease risk factor study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:189–196. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Buckley JD, Howe PRC. Long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may be beneficial for reducing obesity—a review. Nutrients. 2010;2:1212–1230. doi: 10.3390/nu2121212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Eslick GD, Howe PRC, Smith C, Priest R, et al. Benefits of fish oil supplementation in hyperlipidemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2009;136:4–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Makhoul Z, Kristal AR, Gulati R, Luick B, et al. Associations of very high intakes of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids with biomarkers of chronic disease risk among Yup’ik Eskimos. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010;91:777–785. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].O’Brien DM, Kristal AR, Nash SH, Hopkins SE, et al. A Stable Isotope Biomarker of Marine Food Intake Captures Associations between n-3 Fatty Acid Intake and Chronic Disease Risk in a Yup’ik Study Population , and Detects New Associations with Blood Pressure and. J. Nutr. 2014;144:706–713. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.189381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Makhoul Z, Kristal AR, Gulati R, Luick B, et al. Associations of obesity with triglycerides and C-reactive protein are attenuated in adults with high red blood cell eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011;65:808–817. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey National Health and Nutrition Examination III (NHANES-III), 1988–1994: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Dep. Heal. Hum. Serv. Centers Dis. Control Prev. 1998 [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Mohatt GV, Plaetke R, Klejka J, Luick B, et al. The Center for Alaska Native Health Research Study: a community-based participatory research study of obesity and chronic disease-related protective and risk factors. Int. J. Circumpolar Health. 2007;66:8–18. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v66i1.18219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Klimentidis YC, Lemas DJ, Wiener HH, O’Brien DM, et al. CDKAL1 and HHEX are associated with type-2 diabetes-related traits among Yup’ik people. J. Diabetes. 2014;6:251–259. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. U.S. Dep. Heal. Hum. Serv. Centers Dis. Control Prev. 2011 [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Bersamin A, Luick BRBR, King IBIB, Stern JSJS, et al. Westernizing diets influence fat intake, red blood cell fatty acid composition, and health in remote Alaskan Native communities in the center for Alaska Native health study. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2008;108:266–273. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.10.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Johnson JS, Nobmann ED, Asay E, Lanier AP. Dietary intake of Alaska Native people in two regions and implications for health: the Alaska Native Dietary and Subsistence Food Assessment Project. Int. J. Circumpolar Health. 2009;68:99–108. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v68i2.18320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Jacometo CB, Schmitt E, Pfeifer LFM, Schneider A, et al. Linoleic and α-linolenic fatty acid consumption over three generations exert cumulative regulation of hepatic expression of genes related to lipid metabolism. Genes Nutr. 2014;9:405. doi: 10.1007/s12263-014-0405-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Ebrahimi M, Rajion MA, Meng GY, Farjam AS, et al. Diet high in α-linolenic acid up-regulate PPAR-α gene expression in the liver of goats. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2015;18:210–214. [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Xu J, Teran-Garcia M, Park JHY, Nakamura MT, et al. Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Suppress Hepatic Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Protein-1 Expression by Accelerating Transcript Decay. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:9800–9807. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008973200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Wójcik C, Lohe K, Kuang C, Xiao Y, et al. Modulation of adipocyte differentiation by omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids involves the ubiquitin-proteasome system. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2014;18:590–599. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Ntambi JM, Miyazaki M. Regulation of stearoyl-CoA desaturases and role in metabolism. Prog. Lipid Res. 2004;43:91–104. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7827(03)00039-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Dobrzyn P, Dobrzyn A, Miyazaki M, Cohen P, et al. Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 deficiency increases fatty acid oxidation by activating AMP-activated protein kinase in liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004;101:6409–6414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401627101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Ntambi JM, Miyazaki M, Stoehr JP, Lan H, et al. Loss of stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 function protects mice against adiposity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002;99:11482–11486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.132384699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Flowers JB, Rabaglia ME, Schueler KL, Flowers MT, et al. Loss of Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase-1 Improves Insulin Sensitivity in Lean Mice but Worsens Diabetes in Leptin-Deficient Obese Mice. Diabetes. 2007;56:1228–1239. doi: 10.2337/db06-1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Chu K, Miyazaki M, Man WC, Ntambi JM. Stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase 1 deficiency protects against hypertriglyceridemia and increases plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol induced by liver X receptor activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006;26:6786–6798. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00077-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Huang S, Czech MP. The GLUT4 glucose transporter. Cell Metab. 2007;5:237–252. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Zisman A, Peroni OD, Abel ED, Michael MD, et al. Targeted disruption of the glucose transporter 4 selectively in muscle causes insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. Nat. Med. 2000;6:924–8. doi: 10.1038/78693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Eberlé D, Hegarty B, Bossard P, Ferré P, et al. SREBP transcription factors: master regulators of lipid homeostasis. Biochimie. 2004;86:839–848. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2004.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Shimomura I, Bashmakov Y, Horton JD. Increased levels of nuclear SREBP-1c associated with fatty livers in two mouse models of diabetes mellitus. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:30028–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.42.30028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Bell CG, Benzinou M, Siddiq A, Dina C, et al. Genome-wide linkage analysis for severe obesity in french caucasians finds significant susceptibility locus on chromosome 19q. Diabetes. 2004;53:1857–1865. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.7.1857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Dong C, Wang S, Li W-D, Li D, et al. Interacting genetic loci on chromosomes 20 and 10 influence extreme human obesity. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003;72:115–124. doi: 10.1086/345648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Hager J, Dina C, Francke S, Dubois S, et al. A genome-wide scan for human obesity genes reveals a major susceptibility locus on chromosome 10. Nat. Genet. 1998;20:304–308. doi: 10.1038/3123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Gong J, Campos H, McGarvey S, Wu Z, et al. Genetic Variation in Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase 1 Is Associated with Metabolic Syndrome Prevalence in Costa Rican Adults. J. Nutr. 2011;141:2211–2218. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.143503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Warensjö E, Ingelsson E, Lundmark P, Lannfelt L, et al. Polymorphisms in the SCD1 gene: associations with body fat distribution and insulin sensitivity. Obesity. 2007;15:1732–1740. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Eberlé D, Clément K, Meyre D, Sahbatou M, et al. SREBF-1 gene polymorphisms are associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes in French obese and diabetic cohorts. Diabetes. 2004;53:2153–2157. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.8.2153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Bodhini D, Radha V, Ghosh S, Majumder PP, et al. GLUT4 gene polymorphisms and their association with type 2 diabetes in south Indians. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2011;13:913–920. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Xi C, Miyaki K, Ikeda S, Song Y, et al. Association of GLUT4 gene variants with HbA1c level in Japanese men. Endocr. J. 2012;59:677–684. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.ej11-0409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Grarup N, Stender-petersen KL, Andersson EA, Jørgensen T, et al. Association of Variants in the Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Factor 1 (SREBF1) Gene With Type 2 Diabetes, Glycemia, and Insulin Resistance. Diabetes. 2008;57:1136–1142. doi: 10.2337/db07-1534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Berthold HK, Laaksonen R, Lehtimäki T, Gylling H, et al. SREBP-1c gene polymorphism is associated with increased inhibition of cholesterol-absorption in response to ezetimibe treatment. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes. 2008;116:262–267. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Zhang Z, Gong RR, Du J, Xiao LY, et al. Associations of the SREBP-1c gene polymorphism with gender-specific changes in serum lipids induced by a high-carbohydrate diet in healthy Chinese youth. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2011;36:226–232. doi: 10.1139/h11-005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Rudkowska I, Julien P, Couture P, Lemieux S, et al. Cardiometabolic risk factors are influenced by Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase (SCD) − 1 gene polymorphisms and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2014;58:1079–1086. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201300426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Bouchard-Mercier A, Rudkowska I, Lemieux S, Couture P, et al. SREBF1 gene variations modulate insulin sensitivity in response to a fish oil supplementation. Lipids Health Dis. 2014;13:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-13-152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Human Kinetics Books; Champaign IL: 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Boyer BB, Mohatt GV, Plaetke R, Herron J, et al. Metabolic syndrome in Yup’ik Eskimos: The Center for Alaska Native Health Research (CANHR) Study. Obesity. 2007;15:2535–2540. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–419. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].O’Brien DM, Kristal AR, Jeannet MA, Wilkinson MJ, et al. Red blood cell delta15N: a novel biomarker of dietary eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009;89:913–919. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Cohen RM, Franco RS, Khera PK, Smith EP, et al. Red cell life span heterogeneity in hematologically normal people is sufficient to alter HbA1c. Blood. 2008;112:4284–4291. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-154112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Diego S, Tang K, Fu D-J, Julien D, et al. Chip-based genotyping by mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1999;96:10016–10020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Horvath S, Xu X, Lake SL, Silverman EK, et al. Family-based tests for associating haplotypes with general phenotype data: application to asthma genetics. Genet. Epidemiol. 2004;26:61–69. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].George VT, Elston RC. Testing the association between polymorphic markers and quantitative traits in pedigrees. Genet. Epidemiol. 1987;4:193–201. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370040304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Grove WM, Andreasen NC. Simultaneous tests of many hypotheses in exploratory research. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1982;170:3–8. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198201000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Nyholt DR. A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004;74:765–769. doi: 10.1086/383251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Bersamin A, Zidenberg-Cherr S, Stern JS, Luick BR. Nutrient intakes are associated with adherence to a traditional diet among Yup’ik Eskimos living in remote Alaska Native communities: the CANHR Study. Int. J. Circumpolar Health. 2007;66:62–70. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v66i1.18228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Hopkins SE, Austin MA, Metzger JS, Koller KR, et al. Sex differences in obesity prevalence and cardiometabolic factors among Western Alaska Native people. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2015;25:312–318. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.10.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Liew CF, Groves CJ, Wiltshire S, Zeggini E, et al. Analysis of the contribution to type 2 diabetes susceptibility of sequence variation in the gene encoding stearoyl-CoA desaturase, a key regulator of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Diabetologia. 2004;47:2168–2175. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1575-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Chan DC, Watts GF, Mori TA, Barrett PHR, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of n-3 fatty acid supplementation on the metabolism of apolipoprotein B-100 and chylomicron remnants in men with visceral obesity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003;77:300–307. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.2.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Nilsen DWT, Albrektsen G, Landmark K, Moen S, et al. Effects of a high-dose concentrate of n-3 fatty acids or corn oil introduced early after an acute myocardial infarction on serum triacylglycerol and HDL cholesterol. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001;74:50–56. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/74.1.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Lemas DJ, Wiener HW, O’Brien DM, Hopkins S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A gene are associated with variation in body composition and fasting lipid traits in Yup’ik Eskimos. J. Lipid Res. 2012;53:175–184. doi: 10.1194/jlr.P018952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Lemas DJ, Klimentidis YC, Wiener HH, O’Brien DM, et al. Obesity polymorphisms identified in genome-wide association studies interact with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake and modify the genetic association with adiposity phenotypes in Yup’ik people. Genes Nutr. 2013;8:495–505. doi: 10.1007/s12263-013-0340-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].O’Brien DM. Stable Isotope Ratios as Biomarkers of Diet for Health Research. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2015;35:565–594. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Redden DT, Allison DB. Nonreplication in genetic association studies of obesity and diabetes research. J. Nutr. 2003;133:3323–3326. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.11.3323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-kranenburg MJ, Belsky J, Beach S, et al. Gene-by-environment experiments: a new approach to finding the missing heritability. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011;12:881. doi: 10.1038/nrg2764-c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Bourgain C, Abney M, Schneider D, Ober C, et al. Testing for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium in Samples With Related Individuals. Genetics. 2004;168:2349–2361. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.031617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Methods
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8

RESOURCES