Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry logoLink to Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
. 2016 Dec 1;8(5):e546–e549. doi: 10.4317/jced.53057

Evaluation of mineral content in healthy permanent human enamel by Raman spectroscopy

Anna Akkus 1,, Asya Akkus 2, Renato Roperto 3, Ozan Akkus 4, Thiago Porto 1,5, Sorin Teich 6, Lisa Lang 6
PMCID: PMC5149089  PMID: 27957268

Abstract

Background

An understanding of tooth enamel mineral content using a clinically viable method is essential since variations in mineralization may serve as an early precursor of a dental health issues, and may predict progression and architecture of decay in addition to assessing the success and effectiveness of the remineralization strategies.

Material and Methods

Twenty two human incisor teeth were obtained in compliance with the NIH guidelines and site specifically imaged with Raman microscope. The front portion of the teeth was divided into apical, medium and cervical regions and subsequently imaged with Raman microscope in these three locations.

Results

Measured mineralization levels have varied substantially depending on the regions. It was also observed that, the cervical enamel is the least mineralization as a populational average.

Conclusions

Enamel mineralization is affected by a many factors such as are poor oral hygiene, alcohol consumption and high intake of dietary carbohydrates, however the net effect manifests as overall mineral content of the enamel. Thus an early identification of the individual with overall low mineral content of the enamel may be a valuable screening tool in determining a group with much higher than average caries risk, allowing intervention before development of caries. Clinically applicable non-invasive techniques that can quantify mineral content, such as Raman analysis, would help answer whether or not mineralization is associated with caries risk.

Key words:Enamel, Raman spectroscopy, mineral content, dental caries.

Introduction

Enamel is the hardest and the stiffest tissue in the human body. It withstands chewing forces and protects the internal dentin and pulp. It is loaded in a complex fashion throughout the life cycle of an individual. Enamel mineralization is an important property that positively correlates with the mechanical behavior of other tissues such as bone (1) and teeth (2,3). Dental enamel is 95% mineral and 1% organic matter and 4-5% water by weight percentage (4). A reduction in mineral content has direct consequences as far as dental ailments are concerned. For example, molar-incisor hypo mineralization increases tooth sensitivity to food, drinks, and thermal changes as well as results in restoration failure (5). Since variation in mineralization may manifest through white lesion formation, high or lower levels of mineralization may impact the tooth esthetics. Moreover, previous studies suggest a possible relationship between enamel mineral concentration and caries susceptibility (6,7).

Several authors have investigated enamel mineral content (8-12) using various characterization methods in the context of decay (6,7), and demineralization/ remineralization processes (13,14), age (15,16) and disease (17,18). However, the methods cited above are limited to ex vivo laboratory conditions and they are destructive to the specimens.

Raman spectroscopy offers the opportunity to study enamel mineral content in vivo (19,20), non-destructively and site-specifically. While Raman spectroscopy has been applied in the literature to assess tooth mineralization, there are no studies in the literature that examine mineralization of the enamel systematically and provide an understanding of baseline variations that may be inherent in the healthy enamel from individual to individual. The current study employed Raman spectroscopy ex-vivo to identify the variations enamel mineral content between individuals and site to site variations within a given tooth.

Material and Methods

-Sample Preparation

Human teeth were obtained in compliance with the National Institute of Health guidelines. The Institutional Review Board exemption was filed and approved (Protocol#: EM-13-17). Eleven adult human incisors were extracted as a part of a normal treatment plan. The teeth were collected fresh within the date of the extraction and kept moist at all times without any additional disinfecting treatment. A dentist assessed the enamel of the specimens selected for Raman analysis in order to ensure that healthy intact enamel was evaluated. The samples were wrapped in wet tissue paper individually and stored in a -20 ºC freezer. Prior to Raman analysis the specimens were thawed at room temperature for 30 minutes while being wrapped in moist tissue paper. Consequently the specimens were securely positioned horizontally with resin putty in a plastic petri dish that was lined with aluminum foil to prevent stray Raman signal emerging from the plastic. A wet tissue paper was wrapped around the specimen to prevent dehydration during Raman scan, while exposing the region of interest for Raman analysis. Each tooth was measured with a ruler and the length of the crown was divided into 3 zones along the y axis: apical, medial and cervical as shown in figure 1. Three measurements were taken within each zone in order to obtain the average mineralization within each zone.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic of the regions included in the Raman analysis.

-Raman Spectroscopy

In Raman analysis, laser light is focused on a sample using a lens or objective. The reflected photons carry information on the type and the amount of chemical bonds. In the case of mineralized tissues, the phosphate group in the mineral of the enamel scatters Raman signals very strongly. Therefore, the amplitude of the phosphate peak in the Raman spectrum is proportional to the amount of mineral content. That is why, Raman spectroscopy has long been a powerful tool for assessing mineral content not only in the dentistry, but also other mineralized tissues such as bone. In the current study, an x10 objective was used to focus the laser light. The resulting excitation spot was about 10 µm in diameter and the penetration of the laser was within 100 µm.

A Raman microscope (Labram Xplora, Horiba Jobin Yvon, Edison, NJ) with laser source at 785 nm was employed. Measurements were performed using a 1200 lines/mm grating which provided a wavenumber resolution of 1.25 pixels/cm-1. Six acquisitions per point were taken. The Raman wavenumber shift measured by the system was calibrated using the known 520.7 cm-1 peak of a Si wafer. The mineralization was assessed based on the intensity of the 960 cm-1 peak of the phosphate (21,22) symmetric stretch band (23).

-Statistical Analysis

The general linear model, a multivariate analysis of variance test, was performed (Minitab, College Park, PA) to investigate the effects of position within a tooth on mineral content. When the zone-to-zone and tooth-to-tooth variations were significant Tukey’s post-hoc test was performed to check the significance of the differences between zones or individuals. The data distribution was normal as confirmed by Anderson-Darling normality test.

Results

The height of the 960 cm-1 phosphate peak was measured to compare the mineral content levels in 22 incisors. The highest Raman-based mineralization intensity was about 5-fold greater than the lowest measured mineral content, (Fig. 2). All the measurements for corresponding zone from 22 individuals with average number of measurements n=5 per tooth specimen were pooled to generate average populational value of enamel mineral content. Incisor mineral content varied dramatically depending on the regions,when the measurements were pooled within a zone, mineralization level of Zones I and II (apical, medial parts of the crown, respectively) did not differ significantly, (Fig. 3). However Zone III, the cervical region, exhibited lower mineralization (p < 0.05) than Zones I and II.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Raman spectra of incisors with the highest and lowest mineralization scores. The spectrum was shifted vertically for the sake of clarity.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Average incisor mineralization for each zone after pooling the data for twenty two individuals.

Discussion

The results demonstrated that mineralization varies substantially between individuals. It was also observed that, the cervical enamel is the least mineralization as a populational average. The lower mineralization scores for the cervical region may be associated with hygiene index. Dental plaque can be normally found on the cervical area of the tooth. Due to a high acidic nature, dental plaque can easily deactivate the enamel buffering capacity. This is a process when the enamel releases calcium to normalize the saliva pH again, decreasing its mineral content. This creates spaces in enamel which are more opaque and/or whiter. Thus, it is important to understand the differences in degrees of mineralization of different tooth areas when comparing the apical, the middle and cervical areas of the outer enamel. However, the studies in the literature (8-12) are focused on investigating the enamel region in cross-section that required tooth dissection. Raman based monitoring of the mineralization in cervical region may help detect emerging issues and mitigating them.

A range of values of mineral concentration has been reported (24-30) in the literature (EDS, XRD analysis, X-ray microtomography). However, the methods employed require destruction of the specimens, such as sectioning of the tooth in slices. Therefore they are not applicable clinically. While computed tomography is viable, the spatial resolution of clinically available cone-beam systems is insufficient to capture the enamel layer. Subjection of the patient to ionizing radiation is another limitation. The Raman spectroscopy based assessment of mineralization holds a substantial promise for clinical application since Raman spectroscopy is noninvasive and sample preparation free. It is particularly informative in evaluation of the mineral content of enamel since the structural contribution of non-mineral components in mature enamel is small. In the clinical setting, Raman spectroscopy is applied by fiber optic probes to discern the enamel organization employing Raman in the polarized mode. Similar Raman probe analysis can be used to measure mineralization scores.

It has been suggested that the lower mineral concentration may be translated into increased porosity and is possibly linked to higher caries susceptibility (6,7). In addition, some studies (7,8) hypothesized that mineral concentration may be a factor determining rate of demineralization/remineralization as well. Epidemiological studies demonstrate that children from lower social background have higher caries rate (7). It is unknown whether enamel mineralization also plays a role in the greater caries-risk in this population. Other effectors of enamel mineralization are poor oral hygiene, alcohol consumption and high intake of dietary carbohydrates. An early identification of the individual with overall low mineralization of the enamel may be a valuable screening tool in determining a group with much higher than average caries risk, allowing intervention before development of caries.

Conclusions

Non-invasive, sample preparation free Raman spectroscopy was successfully employed to measure mineral content of healthy enamel. It was demonstrated that cervical region of the healthy enamel in the pool of the incisor specimens exhibit the lowest mineralization content in the cervical region of the crown. The overall level of enamel mineral content may serve as a robust predictor of patients’ susceptibility to developing caries, thus granting the opportunity to prevent the caries via clinically available methods of remineralization, fluoride treatment as well as frequent cleaning.

References

  • 1.Leichter I, Margulies JY, Weinreb A, Mizrahi J, Robin GC, Conforty B. The relationship between bone density, mineral content, and mechanical strength in the femoral neck. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;163:272–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kinney JH, Balooch M, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr, Weihs TP. Hardness and Young's modulus of human peritubular and intertubular dentine. Arch Oral Biol. 1996;41:9–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(95)00109-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kodaka T, Debari K, Yamada M, Kuroiwa M. Correlation between microhardness and mineral content in sound human enamel (short communication) Caries Research. 1992;26:139–41. doi: 10.1159/000261498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baldassarri M, Margolis HC, Beniash E. Compositional determinants of mechanical properties of enamel. J Dent Res. 2008;87:645–9. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.William V, Burrow MF, Palamara JE, Messer LB. Microshear bond strength of resin composite to teeth affected by molar hypomineralization using 2 adhesive systems. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28:233–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shellis RP. Relationship between human enamel structure and the formation of caries-like lesions in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 1984;29:975–81. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(84)90144-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Targino AG, Rosenblatt A, Oliveira AF, Chaves AM, Santos VE. The relationship of enamel defects and caries: a cohort study. Oral Dis. 2011;17:420–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01770.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.He B, Huang S, Zhang C, Jing J, Hao Y, Xiao L. Mineral densities and elemental content in different layers of healthy human enamel with varying teeth age. Arch Oral Biol. 2011;56:997–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wong FS, Elliott JC, Davis GR, Anderson P. X-ray microtomographic study of mineral distribution in enamel of mandibular rat incisors. J Anat. 2000;196:405–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19630405.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wong FS, Anderson P, Fan H, Davis GR. X-ray microtomographic study of mineral concentration distribution in deciduous enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2004;49:937–44. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Farah RA, Swain MV, Drummond BK, Cook R, Atieh M. Mineral density of hypomineralised enamel. J Dent. 2010;38:50–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jeng YR, Lin TT, Wong TY, Chang HJ, Shieh DB. Nano-mechanical properties of fluoride-treated enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 2008;87:381–5. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Efeoglu N, Wood D, Efeoglu C. Microcomputerised tomography evaluation of 10% carbamide peroxide applied to enamel. J Dent. 2005;33:561–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Efeoglu N, Wood DJ, Efeoglu C. Thirty-five percent carbamide peroxide application causes in vitro demineralization of enamel. Dent Mater. 2007;23:900–4. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.He B, Huang S, Jing J, Hao Y. Measurement of hydroxyapatite density and Knoop hardness in sound human enamel and a correlational analysis between them. Arch Oral Biol. 2010;55:134–41. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zheng Q, Xu H, Song F, Zhang L, Zhou X, Shao Y. Spatial distribution of the human enamel fracture toughness with aging. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;26:148–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Atar M, Davis GR, Verry P, Wong FS. Enamel mineral concentration in diabetic rodents. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007;8:195–200. doi: 10.1007/BF03262596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koehne T, Marshall RP, Jeschke A, Kahl-Nieke B, Schinke T, Amling M. Osteopetrosis, osteopetrorickets and hypophosphatemic rickets differentially affect dentin and enamel mineralization. Bone. 2013;53:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ko AC, Hewko M, Sowa MG, Dong CC, Cleghorn B, Choo-Smith LP. Early dental caries detection using a fibre-optic coupled polarization-resolved Raman spectroscopic system. Opt Express. 2008;16:6274–84. doi: 10.1364/oe.16.006274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Okagbare PI, Esmonde-White FW, Goldstein SA, Morris MD. Development of non-invasive Raman spectroscopy for in vivo evaluation of bone graft osseointegration in a rat model. Analyst. 2010;135:3142–6. doi: 10.1039/c0an00566e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yeni YN, Yerramshetty J, Akkus O, Pechey C, Les CM. Effect of fixation and embedding on Raman spectroscopic analysis of bone tissue. Calcif Tissue Int. 2006;78:363–71. doi: 10.1007/s00223-005-0301-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leung Y, Morris MD. Characterization of the chemical interactions betwen 4-MET and enamel by Raman spectroscopy. Dent Mater. 1995;11:191–5. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80017-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Akkus O, Polyakova-Akkus A, Adar F, Schaffler MB. Aging of microstructural compartments in human compact bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1012–9. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.6.1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stack MV. Organic constituents of enamel. Biochem J. 1952;50:xxxix. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stack MV. Organic constituents of enamel. J Am Dent Assoc. 1954;48:297–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stack MV. Variation in the organic content of deciduous enamel and dentine. Biochem J. 1953;54:xv. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Weatherell JA, Weidmann SM, Eyre DR. Histological appearance and chemical composition of enamel proteins from mature human molars. Caries Res. 1968;2:281–93. doi: 10.1159/000259567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Weatherell JA, Weidmann SM, Hamm SM. Sampling of enamel particles by means of strong acids for density measurements. Arch Oral Biol. 1966;11:107–12. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(66)90121-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weatherell JA, Weidmann SM, Hamm SM. Density patterns in enamel. Caries Res. 1967;1:42–51. doi: 10.1159/000259498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Weidmann SM, Weatherell JA, Hamm SM. Variations of enamel density in sections of human teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 1967;12:85–97. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(67)90145-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry are provided here courtesy of Medicina Oral S.L

RESOURCES