Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 12.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2016 Aug 19;55(35):4873–4884. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00754

NITRIC OXIDE REGULATION OF H-NOX SIGNALING PATHWAYS IN BACTERIA

Lisa-Marie Nisbett #, Elizabeth M Boon §,#,‡,*
PMCID: PMC5152592  NIHMSID: NIHMS833006  PMID: 27479081

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) is a freely diffusible, radical gas that has now been established as an integral signaling molecule in eukaryotes and bacteria. It has been demonstrated that NO signaling is initiated upon ligation to the heme iron of an H-NOX domain in mammals and in some bacteria. Bacterial H-NOX proteins have been found to interact with enzymes that participate in signaling pathways and regulate bacterial processes such as quorum sensing, biofilm formation and symbiosis. Here, we review the biochemical characterization of these signaling pathways, and where available, describe how NO ligation to H-NOX specifically regulates the activity of these pathways and their associated bacterial phenotypes.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms833006f6.jpg

BACKGROUND

Nitric oxide (NO) is a highly diffusible gas molecule that is soluble in water and lipids. NO has been shown to interact with an array of biomolecules at physiological pH, and has consequently been shown to be involved in many biological processes in both bacteria and eukaryotes.1,2 The biological effects of NO are concentration-dependent. In mammals, at low concentrations (sub-micromolar), NO plays an integral role in regulating physiological processes such as smooth muscle relaxation, vasodilation and neurotransmission.3,4 In eukaryotes5 and some bacteria,6 NO is synthesized by the enzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS) via the oxidation of L-arginine to NO and L-citruline. Subsequently, in eukaryotes, NO binds to the H-NOX (heme-nitric oxide/oxygen binding) domain of the enzyme soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC). The cyclase domain of sGC then becomes active and catalytically converts GTP into cyclic GMP (c-GMP). The production of c-GMP regulates downstream signaling events, such as those mentioned above.7

At high concentrations, NO is a toxic gas produced by eukaryotes to fight tumors and bacterial infections.2,810 The concentrations of NO used to kill invading pathogens also damage host cells, thus eukaryotes are able to respond to NO present at concentrations above that needed to activate sGC.912 From the bacterial perspective, in addition to NO exposure during infection, bacteria are also exposed to high amounts of NO during denitrification, a process in which bacteria respire nitrate or nitrite under oxygen-limiting conditions.13 Because bacteria experience high concentrations of NO during detoxification and denitrification, many NO-responsive proteins have been characterized, including FNR-like transcription factors (fumarate and nitrate regulatory proteins),14 the NO-responsive transcriptional activator NorR (regulator of NO reductase),15 and the NO-sensitive repressor NsrR (repressor of nitrosative stress).16 Bacteria typically detoxify high concentrations of NO using NO-binding enzymes such as flavohemoglobins, flavorubredoxin nitric oxide reductases, respiratory nitric oxide reductases, and cytochrome c nitrite reductases, each of which converts NO into less toxic molecules such as ammonia, nitrate, and nitrous oxide.1721

Interestingly, recent data indicate that bacteria also respond to low concentrations of NO to elicit physiological responses other than those involved in NO elimination. The details of these signaling pathways are not fully elucidated, but one sensitive NO sensor has been described in bacteria. Namely, like eukaryotes, bacteria code for H-NOX domains.

The heme domain of the eukaryotic NO sensor sGC is a member of a family of hemoproteins termed H-NOX. H-NOX domains are encoded in many bacterial genomes, including some pathogens.2224 Bacterial H-NOX domains share 15–40% sequence identity with mammalian sGC H-NOX domains.25 H-NOX proteins encoded by facultative anaerobes, like mammalian sGCs, bind NO and carbon monoxide (CO),23,25 whereas H-NOX proteins from obligate anaerobes bind NO, CO, and also molecular oxygen.22,23 In fact, recent structural studies have suggested that H-NOX proteins from obligate anaerobes may function as oxygen sensing proteins.26 All H-NOX proteins, however, are histidine-ligated protoporphyrin IX hemoproteins that bind their gaseous ligands at a ferrous iron center, and all exhibit slow NO dissociation kinetics with an assumed diffusion-limited association rate constant of ~108 M−1s−1.27,28 Therefore, H-NOX proteins have approximately picomolar affinity for NO,29 which is consistent with their roles as selective NO sensors in both mammals (sGC) and bacteria (isolated H-NOX domains). For more information on the ligand binding properties of H-NOX proteins, several reviews are available.24,3032

Within bacterial genomes, hnoX genes code for stand-alone proteins found in the same putative operons as signaling proteins such as two-component signaling histidine kinases and diguanylate cyclases.33 The most common arrangement is for hnoX to be in the same putative operon as an orphan two-component signaling histidine kinase (without a cognate response regulator in the same operon).29 The histidine kinase and diguanylate cyclase proteins found adjacent to H-NOX domains typically do not contain a sensory domain. Consequently, it is hypothesized that H-NOX functions as a NO sensor and regulates the downstream signaling activities of these proteins in trans. The focus of this review will be to elaborate on how bacterial H-NOX proteins regulate their respective signaling pathways in a NO dependent manner, with a focus on the reported enzymology of H-NOX-regulated proteins (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

NO/H-NOX signaling pathways regulates bacterial processes such as biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and symbiosis.

NITRIC OXIDE REGULATION OF H-NOX/ HACE SIGNALING PATHWAYS

In some bacteria an hnoX gene is predicted to be encoded in the same operon with genes that code for diguanylate cyclase and/or phosphosphodiesterase proteins, recently collectively termed HaCEs (H-NOX-associated cyclic-di-GMP processing enzymes). These proteins are comprised of diguanylate cyclase and/or phosphodiesterase domains, which are identified from conserved GGDEF and EXL or HD-GYP amino acid motifs, respectively. Diguanylate cyclase domains synthesize cyclic-di-GMP (c-di-GMP) by cyclizing two molecules of GTP at a GGDEF-motif-containing active site. Phosphodiesterase domains have either an EXL or HD-GYP motif in their active site and degrade c-di-GMP into the linear molecule pGpG.34 HD-GYP domains typically further cleave pGpG into two molecules of GMP.35 Cyclic-di-GMP is of significance, as it is the major bacterial secondary messenger molecule that regulates the lifestyle switch between planktonic and biofilm phenotypes; it also regulates other important bacterial processes such as virulence and motility.36

Biofilms occur when bacteria accumulate (frequently attached to a surface) in moist environments within a self-secreted exopolymeric material.37 Biofilms are the leading cause of nosocomial infections38,39 and are extremely difficult to treat; cells in a biofilm exhibit up to 1,000-fold higher tolerance to immune defenses and antibiotics.40,41 Interestingly, in recent years, low non-toxic concentrations of NO have been shown to mediate biofilm dispersal.42

In some bacteria, the molecular mechanism for NO-regulated biofilm formation has been demonstrated to be dependent on H-NOX/HaCE signaling. Since the hnoX gene in certain bacteria is present in the same operon as genes for HaCE proteins, as expected, it has been shown that NO ligation to H-NOX can regulate HaCE activity, contributing to the regulation of intracellular concentrations of cyclic-di-GMP, and ultimately leading to regulation of biofilm formation. Currently, a few of these H-NOX/HaCE systems have been biochemically characterized, including those from the bacteria Legionella pneumophila, Shewanella woodyi and more recently, Agrobacterium vitis (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

NO regulates HaCE activity through ligation to H-NOX. (A) LpgHaCE is only functional as a diguanylate cyclase, and its activity remains unchanged in both the presence and absence of Fe(II) LpgH-NOX1, but in the presence of Fe(II)-NO bound LpgH-NOX1, LpgHaCE diguanylate cyclase activity decreases (B) SwHaCE has basal diguanylate cyclase and relatively efficient phosphodiesterase activity in the absence of SwH-NOX. In the presence of Fe(II) SwH-NOX, SwHaCE diguanylate cyclase activity becomes upregulated while the phosphodiesterase activity remains unchanged. In the presence of Fe(II)-NO bound SwH-NOX, however, SwHaCE phosphodiesterase activity becomes upregulated, while the diguanylate cyclase activity returns to basal levels.

Legionella pneumophila

In L. pneumophila, there are two H-NOX-encoding genes that are involved in regulating two different signaling pathways. One H-NOX gene (hnoX1) is adjacent to a di-domain GGDEF-EAL (LpgHaCE) protein, while the other H-NOX gene is adjacent to a histidine kinase and a CheY-like response regulator.43 In a recent study it was shown that the EAL domain of LpgHaCE is inactive; the protein has only diguanylate cyclase activity. Furthermore, in the absence of NO, the Fe(II) unligated form of LpgH-NOX1 does not affect the cyclase activity of LpgHaCE. When bound to NO, however, LpgH-NOX1 was shown to inhibit LpgHaCE activity. The LpgHaCE used in this study, however, was only ~50% pure and demonstrated very low diguanylate cyclase activity; the authors were not able to detect measurable production of c-di-GMP until 24 h post incubation with GTP.43 As a result, the kinetic parameters of LpgHaCE were not assessed. Therefore, it is unknown which kinetic parameters of LpgHaCE are regulated by Fe(II)-NO LpgH-NOX1. This would be interesting to determine as it would provide a more detailed understanding of how NO specifically regulates LpgHaCE activity and possibly biofilm formation in this bacterium.

Based on their biochemical results, the authors hypothesized that exposure to NO should decrease the intracellular c-di-GMP concentrations in this bacterium by regulating the activity of LpgHaCE via ligation to LpgH-NOX1, leading to a decrease in biofilm formation upon exposure to NO. Indeed, they found that genetic deletion of LpgH-NOX1 led to a hyperbiofilm phenotype, consistent with LpgH-NOX1 inhibition of LpgHaCE activity. The authors assumed that the media in this study contained low nanomolar concentrations of NO generated from the decomposition of nitrate. The NO concentration was not determined, however. Furthermore, no biofilm studies were conducted in the absence of nitrate, thus the effect of this presumed NO cannot be conclusively determined.

Shewanella woodyi

S. woodyi encode only one H-NOX gene adjacent to a di-domain GGDEF-EAL (SwHaCE) protein. Our laboratory has shown that SwHaCE has both diguanylate cyclase and phosphodiesterase activities.44 Using purified proteins we demonstrated that SwHaCE has basal diguanylate cyclase activity and relatively efficient phosphodiesterase activity in the absence of SwH-NOX. In the presence of the Fe(II) unligated form of the SwH-NOX, however, the diguanylate cyclase activity increases ~10 fold, while the phosphodiesterase activity remains unchanged, which therefore enables this protein to function primarily as a diguanylate cyclase when complexed to ferrous H-NOX. In the presence of the Fe(II)-NO ligated form of SwH-NOX, however, the diguanylate cyclase activity returns to basal levels but the phosphodiesterase domain hydrolizes c-di-GMP 1.5 times faster than it did in the presence of the Fe(II) unligated form of SwH-NOX or in the absence of H-NOX.44 Further analysis of the phosphodiesterase domain revealed that in the presence of Fe(II)-NO ligated SwH-NOX, the catalytic efficiency of this domain increased 13-fold as both the kcat and KM parameters were enhanced. Therefore, SwHaCE activity is regulated in an NO dependent manner via ligation to SwH-NOX, where Fe(II) SwH-NOX increases SwHaCE diguanylate cyclase activity, while leaving the phosphodiesterase activity unchanged, and the presence of Fe(II)-NO SwH-NOX does the opposite, it decreases SwHaCE diguanylate cyclase activity, and enhances SwHaCE phosphodiesterase activity.44

In a subsequent study, the interaction between SwH-NOX and SwHaCE was investigated using NMR Chemical Shift Pertubation assays. It was found that ~11 SwH-NOX amino acids undergo a chemical shift upon exposure to SwHaCE. Of these 11 residues, the 5 that yield the greatest shifts are co-located in the N-terminal helices of SwH-NOX, suggesting a potential binding surface on SwH-NOX for SwHaCE.45 To further investigate this hypothesis, three SwH-NOX point mutants E16K, E20K, and F17A were made and binding interactions with SwHaCE were assessed using fluorescence quenching assays. An increase in quenching of the intrinsic fluorescence of SwHaCE was observed upon titration with the Fe(II)-NO bound form of wild-type SwH-NOX, but not upon titration with any one of the mutants, suggesting a loss of binding between SwH-NOX and SwHaCE, and confirming that the N-terminal helical region of SwH-NOX is involved in binding to SwHaCE.45

Interestingly, this same region of the H-NOX domain of mammalian sGC has been implicated in regulation of its cyclase activity. Direct inter-domain interactions between the PAS domain/H-NOX domain heme-associated helix (αF) and the cyclase domain in sGC were mapped with Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry,46 and NO binding to sGC was shown to regulate these interactions and ultimately cyclase domain activity.47 This suggests an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for NO/H-NOX regulation of enzyme activity.

The biochemical results reported above predict that NO/H-NOX should down-regulate S. woodyi biofilm formation in the presence of NO. We found that exposure to nanomolar concentrations of NO indeed causes a decrease in S. woodyi biofilm formation. Further, we found decreased biofilm in a mutant strain in which the hnoX gene was deleted, as well as no NO phenotype. These biofilm results are consistent with SwH-NOX being the NO sensor responsible for regulating biofilm as well as the enzymology described above, as both the absence of SwH-NOX, as well as NO-bound SwH-NOX, result in low SwHaCE cyclase activity, which would lead to decreased intracellular c-di-GMP concentrations and a subsequent decrease in biofilm formation.

In addition, NO-bound SwH-NOX also leads to efficient c-di-GMP hydrolysis, which presumably could result in a dramatic decrease in intracellular cyclic-di-GMP and explain the decrease in S. woodyi biofilm upon exposure to NO.

Agrobacterium vitis

Recently, our lab has also worked on the characterization of an H-NOX signaling pathway in A. vitis. As previously seen in L. pneumophilia and S. woodyi, A.vitis H-NOX is encoded in the same operon as a gene that codes for a di-domain GGDEF-EAL (AviHaCE). Like SwHaCE, using purified proteins, we have shown that AviHaCE has both diguanylate cyclase and phosphodiesterase activities, but in the absence of AviH-NOX the phosphodiesterase domain is more catalytically active with a kcat/Km value that is ~12 times more efficient than the diguanylate cyclase domain (Nesbitt et al, unpublished data). Moreover, preliminary biofilm data also reveals that the genetic deletion of AviH-NOX or exposure to nanomolar concentrations of NO results in a decrease in biofilm formation (Nesbitt et al, unpublished data). These findings are consistent with our results in S. woodyi; since the AviH-NOX/HaCE is homologous to the SwH-NOX signaling pathway, we hypothesize that NO also regulates the AviH-NOX/HaCE signaling network in a similar manner.

NO/H-NOX-ASSOCIATED TWO-COMPONENT SIGNALING INVOLVED IN C-DI-GMP SIGNALING NETWORKS

Two-component signaling systems (also referred to as His-Asp phosphorelay signaling systems) are utilized by both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria to detect and respond to various environmental stimuli such as nutrient availability, pH, osmolarity and host factors.48 Simple two-component signaling systems are comprised of two proteins, a sensor histidine kinase and a response regulator protein. The sensor histidine kinase functions to detect (via its sensory domain) and respond to environmental stimuli using ATP as a phosphodonor for the autophosphorylation of a conserved histidine residue. Hereafter, the signal is transmitted downstream via phosphotransfer from the histidine residue to a conserved aspartic acid residue in the receiver domain of a cognate response regulator protein, a process that is catalyzed by the latter protein.29 Phosphorylation of the response regulator activates its output domain, which then elicits the appropriate cellular response.49

Many two-component signaling systems deviate from the simple architecture described above. These alternate systems include hybrid histidine kinases29 and the replacement of the histidine kinase sensory domain by an accessory protein, thus resulting in a three-component signaling system.5052 In the hybrid systems, typically, the histidine kinase has histidine phosphotransfer and catalytic domains, as well as a receiver domain present within the same polypeptide.49 In response to a stimulus, the hybrid kinase autophosphorylates its conserved histidine residue and subsequently transfers the phosphate intramolecularly to its receiver domain. Hereafter the phosphate is transferred to a histidine-containing phosphotransfer protein (Hpt) which then transfers the phosphate to the appropriate response regulators.49

In the three-component signaling systems, an accessory protein functions to directly detect the environmental stimuli and convey this information to a histidine kinase via a protein-protein interaction.50,51 H-NOX genes are most commonly encoded for in the same operon as two-component signaling histidine kinases that lack sensory domains. Consequently, H-NOX can function to detect NO and thus regulate these histidine kinase-signaling pathways in a NO dependent fashion. These histidine kinases are often called HaHKs (H-NOX-associated histidine kinases) and this portion of the review will focus on how NO has been shown to regulate H-NOX-associated three-component signaling systems in various bacteria (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

NO regulates HaHK autophosphorylation activity via ligation to H-NOX in Shewanella oneidensis (A) Vibrio cholerae (B) and Pseudoalteromonas atlantica (C). (A) SoHaHK autophosphorylation activity remains unchanged in the presence and absence of Fe(II) SoH-NOX. SoHaHK activity, however, is inhibited in the presence of Fe(III), Fe(II)-NO and Fe(II)-CO bound forms of SoH-NOX, with Fe(II)-NO and Fe(II)-CO yielding the greatest inhibition effect. (B) VcHaHK activity remains unchanged in the absence of VcH-NOX. In the presence of the Fe(III), Fe(II)-NO, and apo forms of VcH-NOX, VcHaHK activity is inhibited, with the Fe(III) and Fe(II)-NO bound forms yielding the highest degree of inhibition. (C) PaHaHK displays autophosphorylation activity in the absence of PaH-NOX. Inhibition of PaHaHK activity is observed in the presence of all forms of PaH-NOX. The greatest degree of inhibition occurs in the presence of Fe(II)-NO bound PaH-NOX. Only homologs of the EAL and “HD-GYP” domain containing response regulators are present in Vibrio cholerae, while all three response regulator proteins are present in Pseudoalteromonas atlantica, but only the “HD-GYP” domain containing response regulator protein, however, has been characterized.

Shewanella oneidensis

The first H-NOX-associated two-component signaling pathway characterized was from the bacterium S. oneidensis.53 In the first study, the authors found that in the absence of SoH-NOX, SoHaHK displays in vitro histidine kinase activity with ATP-dependent autophosphorylation in a time-dependent manner. In the presence of Fe(II) unligated SoH-NOX, SoHaHK activity is not affected. In the presence of Fe(III), Fe(II)-NO, and Fe(II)-CO SoH-NOX, however, SoHaHK activity decreases in a SoH-NOX concentration dependent manner.53 The authors found 50% inhibition of kinase activity in the presence of 5–10 µM of Fe(II)-NO SoH-NOX, and the highest degree of inhibition occurred with 100 µM (100-fold excess) of Fe(II)-NO or Fe(II)-CO SoH-NOX.53

Structural studies on SoH-NOX have revealed the molecular mechanism of NO-induced SoH-NOX activation.54 Using X-ray crystallography experiments, it was found that in the Fe(II) unligated state, the heme is highly distorted due to van der Waals interaction between proline 116 and pyrrole A which results in the displacement of pyrroles A and D from planarity. Additionally, the presence of an ordered water molecule in the proximal heme pocket facilitates a hydrogen bonding network with H103, H99, P116 and I118. This network not only maintains the conformation of the αF helix (which contains the P116 residue), but is essential for preserving the basal conformational state of the protein.54 In the Fe(II)-NO bound state, consistent with spectroscopic studies, NO was found to bind as a five-coordinate adduct. Hereafter, the iron-histidine bond is cleaved due to a conformational change in the αF helix which leads to the heme-ligating hisitidine (H103) moving ~8.5 Å away from the heme iron, and the P116 residue moving away from the heme, which subsequently results in the relaxation of the heme towards planarity. Further, a new backbone hydrogen bonding network between the residues D100 and L104 forms which stabilizes the new conformation and the out position of the αF helix and H103 residue respectively. These findings support the hypotheses that NO binding induces heme flattening and subsequent activation of H-NOX proteins.54

Additional support for the hypothesis of NO activation was also demonstrated when the authors mimicked the transient six coordinate Fe(II)-NO bound state using Manganese (II) protoporphyrin IX. As expected, no significant conformational changes were observed and the iron-histidine (H103) bond remained intact, revealing that conformational activation of NO bound SoH-NOX results from cleavage of the iron-histidine bond.54 Together, these findings not only collectively reveal the conformational changes that SoH-NOX endures upon NO binding, but also disclose the molecular mechanism of NO-H-NOX activation and subsequent regulation of the H-NOX associated signaling pathway in Shewanella oneidensis and possibly in other bacteria.

Events downstream of SoH-NOX/HaHK have also been determined. It has been demonstrated that SoHaHK engages in phosphotransfer with at least three cognate response regulators, an EAL-domain containing protein, a degenerate HD-GYP-domain containing protein, and an HTH-domain containing protein.55 Because NO-bound SoH-NOX inhibits SoHaHK autophosphorylation53 and phosphotransfer activity (vide supra),55 a model was generated predicting that phosphate flux through the whole pathway should be down regulated in the presence of NO, which would subsequently lead to an increase in cyclic-di-GMP levels inside the bacterium (due to inhibition of the EAL-response regulator in the absence of phosphorylation) and an increase in biofilm formation.55 Interestingly, the authors only tested their model under anaerobic conditions, but they did find that under these conditions, S. oneidensis exhibits increased biofilm formation in the presence of NO. It has been well-documented that S. oneidensis does not form robust biofilms in the absence of oxygen, however, instead S. oneidensis rapidly disperses from biofilm in response to decreasing oxygen levels.56 Therefore, it is difficult to interpret the biofilm data in this study, and it is possible that the apparent increase in biofilm formation in the presence of NO was a caveat of an extremely low cell density (due to biofilm dispersion). Indeed, in our laboratory, when grown under aerobic conditions, we find that NO causes a decrease in S. oneidensis biofilm formation. (Arora et al, manuscript in preparation) Nevertheless, the results indicate that NO signaling in this bacterium is very complex.

To further investigate this proposed model, the authors also assessed the role of the HTH-domain containing response regulator protein in the S. oneidensis NO signaling pathway. Gene expression profiling experiments using an S. oneidensis mutant containing a deletion of the HTH-domain containing response regulator revealed that 7 genes are upregulated, 6 of which are contained in the NO signaling pathway (the hno genes).57 These genes are present in 3 operons that are at two separate loci in the S. oneidensis chromosome. The hnoX and hahK are in an isolated operon under the control of one promoter termed hnoXp, and the other two operons share a bidirectional promoter and are termed hnoCp (includes the eal and hth domain containing response regulator genes) and hnoDp (includes the hd-gyp domain containing response regulator genes). Using GFP reporter assays, the authors found that the HTH-domain containing response regulator protein interacts with all three promoters, and that only in the HTH deletion mutant strain could measurable levels of GFP fluorescence be detected, whereas in the wild-type and hnoX and hahK deletion strains, no GFP fluorescence could be detected. Thus the authors conclude the HTH is a gene repressor for all three operons.57

In additional experiments, the gene transcription regulation mechanism by this response regulator was found to be direct interaction with the hnoX and hnoC/D promoters, as the HTH binding site overlaps with the transcription start site for all three promoters, and could interfere with transcription of the associated operons. Furthermore, from phosphorylation and size exclusion experiments, the HTH domain-containing response regulator was found to bind all three promoters in a tetrameric state (apparent size of ~175 kDa) when unphosphorylated. Upon phosphorylation, however, the subunits dissociate into monomers (apparent size of ~45 kDa) and enable promoter accessibility for gene transcription.57 These findings enabled the authors to generate a model predicting that unphosphorylated HTH domain-containing response regulator inhibits gene transcription and subsequently inhibits phosphate flux through the signaling pathway,55 while the phosphorylated HTH domain-containing response regulator, on the other hand, enables gene transcription and enhances phosphate flux through the signaling pathway.57 These changes in phosphate flux not only have implications for S. oneidensis biofilm formation, but further reveal the complexity that underlies the regulation of the NO/H-NOX signaling pathway in Shewanella oneidensis.

Vibrio cholerae

An H-NOX-associated two-component signaling network similar to that of S. oneidensis has been identified in V. cholerae.55 Biochemical characterization of this two-component signaling pathway indicates that, as observed in S. oneidensis, VcHaHK engages in phosphotransfer with homologous EAL-domain and degenerate HD-GYP-domain containing response regulator proteins, but V. cholerae does not encode the homologous HTH-domain containing response regulator.55

New evidence suggests that VcH-NOX may function as both an NO and a redox sensor.58 The effect of heme-free (apo VcH-NOX) and heme-bound VcH-NOX on VcHaHK autophosphorylation activity was assessed using purified proteins. It was found that VcHaHK activity is inhibited by heme-bound Fe(III), Fe(II)-NO and apo VcH-NOX, with the heme-bound forms being the most effective inhibitors in vitro58 Moreover, the authors investigated the mechanism of heme-independent (apo VcH-NOX) inhibition of VcHaHK autophosphorylation activity and observed that only the cysteine oxidized form of apo VcH-NOX could inhibit VcHaHK activity, and that this inhibition was due to a stable interaction with VcHaHK.58 Since VcH-NOX may have dual functionality, it would be interesting to determine if both functions can regulate biofilm formation and pathogenicity in Vibrio cholerae. Furthermore, this paper raises questions about whether H-NOX proteins in general can also function as redox sensors. Interestingly, it has also been proposed that Nostoc punctiforme H-NOX may function as a redox sensor, although through oxidation of the heme, not cysteine amino acids.59

Pseudoalteromonas atlantica

NO has also been shown to regulate an H-NOX-associated two-component signaling pathway in the bacterium P. atlantica.29 In the absence of PaH-NOX, purified PaHaHK displays autophosphorylation activity in an ATP- and time-dependent manner. Further, PaHaHK activity is inhibited by all forms of PaH-NOX [Fe(III), Fe(II), Fe(II)-NO and Fe(II)-CO]. The greatest degree of PaHaHK inhibition, however, occurs with the Fe(II)-NO bound form of PaH-NOX (present in only a two-fold excess of PaHaHK). Furthermore, the inhibition of PaHahK activity by NO bound PaH-NOX was shown to be dose-dependent.29 Additionally, a cognate response regulator (homologous to the HD-GYP domain in the S. oneidensis H-NOX/HaHK pathway) was identified via a bioinformatics screen. By homology, the P. atlantica H-NOX signaling pathway also contains the EAL and HTH-domain containing response regulators,55 but only the HD-GYP protein has been biochemically characterized in this system. It was further shown that the HD-GYP response regulator exhibits autophosphatase activity towards the generic substrate 3-O-methylfluorescein phosphate (OMFP), which is essential in understanding how response regulator proteins can mediate the duration of a stimulus response.60 Whether this autophosphatase activity is explicitly regulated in an NO dependent manner is currently unknown. But based on the biochemical data, we can hypothesize that inhibition of PaHaHK via NO bound PaH-NOX would decrease phosphate flux to the response regulator and subsequently regulate its autophosphatase activity.

NO/H-NOX-ASSOCIATED TWO-COMPONENT SIGNALING INVOLVED IN QUORUM SENSING NETWORKS

In addition to regulating canonical histidine kinases, H-NOX proteins have also been shown to regulate the activity of hybrid histidine kinases, and therefore the phosphorelay of associated signaling pathways. In particular, H-NOX-associated hybrid histidine kinase signaling pathways have been implicated in quorum sensing networks (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

NO regulates HqsK autophosphorylation activity and subsequently influences quorum sensing activity in Vibrio harveyi (A) and Vibrio parahemolyticus (B). (A) In the absence and presence of Fe(II) VhH-NOX, VhHqsK autophosphorylation, and therefore kinase activity, remains unchanged enabling phosphate flux to LuxU/LuxO to occur. In the presence of Fe(III), Fe(II)-NO and Fe(II)-CO bound forms of VhH-NOX, VhHqsK autophosphorylation activity decreases. VhHqsK phosphatase activity increases causing phosphate flux to occur in the reverse. The greatest degree of VhHqsK autophosphorylation inhibition occurs in the presence of Fe(II)-NO VhH-NOX. (B) VpHqsK functions as a kinase in the absence of VpH-NOX. In the presence of VpH-NOX, VpHqsK kinase activity decreases while its phosphatase activity increases. The highest degree of inhibition of VpHqsK activity was observed in the presence of Fe(II)-NO VpH-NOX.

Vibrio harveyi

The first biochemical characterization of an H-NOX-associated hybrid histidine kinase two-component signaling system is from the bacterium V. harveyi.61 V. harveyi is known to participate in quorum sensing (QS), a phenomenon in which gene expression is regulated in bacterial communities, and affects behaviors such as virulence, biofilm formation, bioluminescence and antibiotic resistance in response to the detection of secreted molecules called autoinducers.61 Autoinducers are small molecules that accumulate in the environment as a function of bacterial cell density. At a critical population size, the autoinducer threshold limit is attained, and a signal transduction cascade is initiated that leads to community-wide changes in gene expression and group behaviors.62 V. harveyi has been used as a model organism for studying QS because at high cell density (high autoinducer concentration), bioluminescence in promoted.62

Interestingly, low concentrations of NO have been shown to mediate bacterial community behaviors.34 The hnoX gene in V. harveyi is coded for in the same operon as a hybrid histidine kinase with high similarity to the kinase domain of LuxQ, a kinase involved in the V. harveyi QS network. Therefore, our laboratory hypothesized that NO/H-NOX may affect community behaviors by directly participating in QS through this hybrid kinase. Our lab investigated this hypothesis in V. harveyi and found that nanomolar concentrations of NO induce bioluminescence, thus suggesting an autoinducer-like role for NO.

The molecular mechanism of this phenomenon was determined by biochemical and genetic characterization of the H-NOX-associated two-component signaling pathway. The H-NOX-associated quorum sensing kinase (HqsK) was shown to exhibit time-dependent, stable autophosphorylation activity in the absence and presence of Fe(II) VhH-NOX. In the presence of Fe(III) and Fe(II)-CO bound VhH-NOX, HqsK activity was inhibited. The greatest degree of inhibition, however, was seen in the presence of Fe(II)-NO VhH-NOX in a concentration-dependent manner.61 These findings suggest that NO participates in QS by regulating the activity of VhHqsK and influencing phosphate flux through LuxU/LuxO, leading to LuxR regulation, which results in regulation of bioluminescence, among other QS-regulated phenotypes. Indeed, transfer of phosphate from VhHqsK to LuxU was demonstrated in vitro and occurred in a time dependent manner.61

To further test the outlined hypothesis above, an hnoX gene deletion mutant was produced and it was found that in the absence of NO, this mutant displayed delayed bioluminescence in comparison to wild-type V. harveyi. In the presence of NO, no change in bioluminescence was observed in the hnoX gene deletion mutant. Plasmid complementation of the hnoX gene, however, restored bioluminescence comparable to that of wild-type V. harveyi. These findings further substantiate the role of NO as an autoinducer-like molecule, that acts through the VhH-NOX/HqsK signaling network.61

In a follow up study, the effect of NO signaling on flagella production and biofilm formation in Vibrio harveyi was assessed.63 Biofilm experiments revealed that low NO concentrations (50 nM) enhance V. harveyi biofilm formation, but higher concentrations of NO (100 nM and 200 nM) decrease biofilm formation. Deletion of the hnoX gene yielded an overall decrease in biofilm formation, and further addition of cell free media containing the other autoinducers did not induce the observed 50 nM NO biofilm phenotype. Only plasmid complementation of the hnoX gene restored the observed increased biofilm phenotype and is suggestive of NO/H-NOX regulation of biofilm formation in V. harveyi.63

iTRAQ proteomics experiments were used to further substantiate the biofilm analysis, and it was found that the proteome pattern at 50 nM NO was different from the observed patterns at 100 nM and 200 nM, as many proteins, including all 5 of the flagellin proteins, displayed decreased expression at 50 nM NO, but normal expression at 100 nM and 200 nM NO. Moreover, another protein, CheY, displayed a similar NO-dependent pattern in the proteome,63 and was of interest as this protein is known to interact with flagellar motor proteins, modify flagellar behavior,64 and when overexpressed in E. coli, mediate clockwise flagellar rotation6567 and reduce bacteria motility. Taken together, these experimental findings reveal that NO/H-NOX not only regulates bioluminescence, but influences flagellar protein expression and biofilm formation, and is therefore suggestive of all three processes being NO-QS-regulated phenotypes in V. harveyi.

Vibrio parahaemolyticus

To determine if NO participation in QS is a general phenomenon, a homologous H-NOX-associated two-component signaling system was identified in, and characterized from, the bacterial species V. parahaemolyticus. VpHqsK, like VhHqsk, displays ATP-dependent autophosphorylation activity in a time-dependent manner in the absence of VpH-NOX. (Ueno et al, manuscript in preparation) VpHqsK was also shown to transfer phosphate to the VpLuxU protein, thus revealing how this pathway participates in QS. To ensure that the phosphotransfer between VpHqsK and LuxU was due to kinetic preference, the VpHqsk kinase domain and internal receiver domain were separately cloned, expressed and simultaneously incubated with LuxU as well as two other VpHpt proteins. From this experiment it was shown that only LuxU was able to engage in phosphotransfer with VpHqsK domains within fifteen minutes of incubation. These data indicate that the VpHqsK/LuxU interaction is not due to crosstalk but rather is a consequence of LuxU and HqsK being a cognate pair. (Ueno et al, manuscript in preparation)

VpHqsK activity was also assessed in the presence of VpH-NOX. VpHqsK autophosphorylation activity was inhibited in the presence of Fe(III), Fe(II), Fe(II)-NO and Fe(II)-CO forms of VpH-NOX. The greatest degree of inhibition, however, was seen in the presence of Fe(II)-NO bound VpH-NOX, where the autophosphosphorylation also decreased in a VpH-NOX concentration dependent manner. (Ueno et al, manuscript in preparation) Finally, the expression of the master QS regulators OpaR and AphA were investigated in the presence of NO, and it was found that OpaR gene expression increased as a function of increasing NO concentrations. AphA gene expression, however, remained relatively constant, but did increase at 200 µM concentration of NO donor. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that NO can participate in and influence QS, and thus reveal that both VpH-NOX/HqsK (Ueno et al, manuscript in preparation) and VhH-NOX/HqsK61 are NO-responsive quorum sensing signaling pathways that are likely regulated in a similar manner.

NO/H-NOX-ASSOCIATED TWO-COMPONENT SIGNALING TO REGULATE SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIPS

In addition to being involved in regulating various two-component signaling systems and c-di-GMP signaling networks, NO has also been shown to be involved in many microbial symbiotic relationships with various hosts including insects, nematodes and marine invertebrates (Figure 5).1

Figure 5.

Figure 5

NO regulates VfHaHK and SiliHaHK autophosphorylation activity and may ultimately influence their symbiotic relationships with their respective eukaryotic hosts. (A) In V. fischeri, Fe(II)-NO bound H-NOX may inhibit VfHaHK autophosphorylation activity which not only leads to a change in phosphate flow in the predicted signaling network but also influences its symbiosis with Euprymna scolopes, the Hawaiian bobtail squid. (B) In Silicibacter sp. TrichCH4B, SiliHaHK autophosphorylation activity and phosphate flow within the pathway remain unchanged in the absence and presence of Fe(II) and Fe(II)-CO bound SiliH-NOX. NO bound SiliH-NOX has been shown to decrease SiliHaHK autophosphorylation activity while increasing SiliHaHK phosphatase activity. This causes a decrease in phosphate flow within the SiliHaHK signaling pathway leading to increased biofilm formation, and influences Silicibacter sp. TrichCH4B symbiosis with Trichodesmium erythraeum, an algal symbiont.

Vibrio fischeri

One such example is the symbiotic relationship between the bacterium V. fischeri and the Hawaiian bobtail squid Euprymna scolopes.68 Using transcriptional profiling with wild-type and an hnoX-insertion mutant V. fischeri strain, it was found that iron-uptake genes of V. fischeri are regulated in an NO-dependent manner via ligation to VfH-NOX. In particular, of 20 genes that were down-regulated in the presence of NO (exposed for 30 minutes), 10 of these genes were found to have promoter sequences similar to the Fur (ferric iron uptake regulator) binding site in E. coli.69 Further investigation revealed that 8 of the 10 genes are involved in iron acquisition or use, and their expression is dependent on the Fur regulon in the presence of NO, as no changes in gene expression were observed in the hnoX-insertion mutant strain.

The effect of NO on V. fischeri grown in iron depleted minimal media supplemented with hemin was then assessed and it was concluded that NO suppresses V. fischeri hemin uptake, as both wild-type and hnoX-deletion mutant strains demonstrated delayed initial growth in the presence of NO. Hereafter, the wild-type strain grew at a slower rate than the mutant. Genetic in trans complementation of the hnoX gene, however, restored the observed wild-type growth phenotype, and in the absence of NO, both wild-type and the mutant strains utilize hemin as an iron source.

Based on the previous experimental findings, the authors hypothesized that VfH-NOX functions as a sensor for host-derived NO and its absence may lead to defects in symbiosis. Consequently, the role of VfhnoX gene in symbiotic colonization was investigated, and it was found that the VfhnoX gene deletion mutant strain displayed faster initiation of colonization than wild-type Vibrio fischeri, as juveniles colonized with the mutants achieved bioluminescence sooner.68 This observed competitive advantage was reversed by genetic complementation of the VfhnoX gene, and further experiments revealed that the mutant is better able to acquire iron during colonization, but in the presence of seawater supplemented with excess hemin (0.2 µM) or free iron (10 µM), the mutant becomes outcompeted by the wild-type strain. This observed phenotype was also seen in experiments conducted with the addition of S-methyl-L-thiocitrulline (SMTC), a general NOS inhibitor. 68

Taken together, these experimental findings collectively suggest that NO/ VfH-NOX mediates V. fischeri and Euprymna scolopes symbiosis by suppressing rapid growth and hemin uptake of the bacterium, which may be necessary to exert temporal control of bioluminescence and subsequent counter-illumination of the Hawaiian bobtail squid Euprymna scolopes. At the molecular level, however, this regulation is still presently unclear, as no published biochemical data on how NO explicitly regulates the VfH-NOX/HaHK pathway is currently available. Since, however, the VfH-NOX/HaHK is similar in architecture to other H-NOX/HaHK systems, we predict that it is regulated in a similar NO-dependent manner.24

Silicibacter sp. strain Trich4B

NO has also been shown to regulate an H-NOX/HahK signaling network in the bacterium Silicibacter sp. strain Trich4B.5 Interestingly, this bacterium most closely resembles the mammalian sGC signaling pathway, as both NOS and H-NOX proteins are encoded in the genome of this bacterium.5 Full length SiliNOS expression in an active form was unsuccessful so the oxygenase domain (SiliNOSox) was expressed and it was found to produce NO in the presence of oxygen.

The S. Trich4B H-NOX/HaHK network is comprised of SiliH-NOX, SiliHaHK (a hybrid histidine kinase), SiliHpt, and a response regulator diguanylate cyclase protein, SiliDGC. Using purified proteins the authors demonstrated that in the absence of SiliH-NOX, SiliHaHK displays autophosphorylation activity in a time-dependent manner. Additionally, SiliHaHK engages in phosphorelay with SiliHpt. Phosphotransfer profiling experiments were independently conducted with different orphan response regulators and only the incubation of SiliHaHK and SiliHpt with the SiliDGC response regulator resulted in a loss of phosphorylation from both SiliHaHK and SiliHpt proteins within 1 minute, while all other response regulators yielded a slow loss of phosphorylation from SiliHaHK and SiliHpt (within 15 to 30 minutes). These findings indicate that SiliHaHK, SiliHpt, and the SiliDGC response regulator are cognate pairs. Further biochemical investigation revealed that SiliDGC activity decreases by approximately 40% in the presence of SiliHaHK/SiliHpt and ATP. This change in SiliDGC activity, however, was not observed when either the SiliHaHK D386A mutant (unable to transfer phosphate to SiliHpt) was present in, or SiliHpt or ATP was absent from, the reaction mixture.5 To understand how NO regulates this signaling pathway, SiliHaHK autophosphorylation activity was assessed in the presence of SiliH-NOX. Fe(II) and Fe(II)-CO SiliH-NOX do not affect SiliHaHK activity. SiliHaHK autophosphorylation activity, however, is inhibited in the presence of Fe(II)-NO SiliH-NOX, thus indicating that the SiliH-NOX/HaHK pathway may be regulated in a NO dependent manner.5

Hereafter, the authors investigated the effect of NO on biofilm formation in S. Trich4B under anaerobic conditions, and found that exogenous NO increases biofilm formation in a concentration dependent manner.5 This result is consistent with the observed biochemical data as NO/SiliH-NOX inhibits SiliHaHK, which decreases phosphate flow to SiliHpt and SiliDGC, and therefore enables c-di-GMP production and biofilm formation to occur in this bacterium.5

Silicibacter sp. strain Trich4B is typically found in association with the alga Trichodesmium erythraeum. Consequently, the effect of T. erythraeum on Silicibacter sp. strain Trich4B NO formation was assessed, and it was found that only T. erythraeum spent medium (TSM) increased Silicibacter sp. strain Trich4B NO production (by ~7-fold). Neither a small molecule fraction of the spent medium nor proteinase K treated spent medium increased NO production, as they yielded similar NO production phenotypes as the no spent medium fraction condition. 5 Finally, upon investigating if T. erythraeum, via TSM, could regulate SiliNOS gene expression and biofilm formation in Silicibacter sp. strain Trich4B, the authors found that TSM increases both SiliNOS mRNA levels and Silicibacter sp. strain Trich4B biofilm formation in a concentration-dependent manner.5

Collectively, these experimental findings suggest that Silicibacter sp. strain Trich4B symbiosis with T. erythraeum mediates biofilm formation in this bacterium, as T. erythraeum upregulates SiliNOS gene expression, which ultimately leads to NO-induced biofilm formation in Silicibacter sp. strain Trich4B and symbiotic colonization with T. erythraeum. It should be noted, however, that TSM treated biofilms were grown under aerobic conditions while exogenous NO treated biofilms were grown anaerobically; and although a biofilm phenotype was observed for the latter biofilm conditions, it would still be interesting to demonstrate whether exogenous NO has the same predicted biofilm effect as SiliNOS produced NO under aerobic conditions. Furthermore, it would be interesting to assess the biofilm formation capabilities and symbiotic competence of a SilihnoX gene deletion mutant as these findings could provide more insight as to how NO explicitly regulates these two processes in Silicibacter sp. strain Trich4B.

PERSPECTIVES AND CONCLUSIONS

In this review, we have presented a summary of the documented roles for NO in bacterial signaling networks through ligation to an H-NOX domain. From the studies reviewed in this paper, it has been shown that the H-NOX proteins are predicted to have approximately picomolar affinity for NO and H-NOX-associated signaling pathways are governed at nanomolar concentrations of NO.24 Biochemically, the various H-NOX signaling pathways have been shown to be involved in the regulation of processes including biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and regulation of symbiosis, in an NO dependent manner; the overall biological significance of NO signaling in bacteria is still currently being addressed, however.

In the instance of V. harveyi, for example, NO has been shown to participate in QS and regulate bioluminescence, biofilm formation, and flagellar motility.61,63 As NO functions analogously to an autoinducer, it follows that V. harveyi might be the source of NO, as QS bacteria typically synthesize and release autoinducers to their external environment.70 V. harveyi, however, does not encode for a NOS protein and is thus not expected to produce NO. This raises the question of the source of the NO. Nitrate respiration under anaerobic conditions (via nitrate reductase) is a possible source of NO.71 V. harveyi is predominantly found at the surface in marine environments where oxygen content is high72 and nitrate reductase expression levels are low.71 Nonetheless, it is certainly possible that NO signaling is triggered upon a drop in local oxygen concentration. Interestingly, V. harveyi has been found to be pathogenic to various marine organisms such as shrimp,73 pearl oysters, fish, seahorses and lobsters,74 and has also been shown to be involved in a mutualistic symbiotic relationship with the hydrozoan Aglaophenia octodonta.75 Consequently, as observed with V. fischeri and its eukaryotic host Euprymna scolopes, it is possible that the aforementioned eukaryotes could function as a source of NO, which could then ligate to VhH-NOX and enable these host-V. harveyi relationships, as QS has been shown to be implicated in mediating V. harveyi pathogenicity.76 Additionally, since V. harveyi also displays bioluminescence during these host-bacteria relationships, it is very likely, especially in the case of symbiosis, that bioluminescence may serve as a useful light source for the V. harveyi symbiont Aglaophenia octodonta.75 Further studies, however, need to be conducted to determine if this is a physiological function of V. harveyi bioluminescence, after which, the effect of NO on regulating this bioluminescence and subsequent symbiotic relationship (as was observed in Silicibacter Trich4B and T. erythraeum) between V. harveyi and Aglaophenia octodonta should be further assessed.

NO has been shown to mediate biofilm formation in many bacteria.77 Interestingly, however, in some bacteria, the NO/H-NOX pathway appears to induce biofilm formation, while in other bacteria it reduces biofilm formation. This could easily be due to differences in the lifestyle and environmental niche of the various bacteria. It is interesting to note, however, that in many of the cases where NO/H-NOX was shown to increase biofilm formation, the biofilm experiments were carried out under anaerobic conditions. It is yet be determined if NO/H-NOX truly differentially regulates biofilm formation in various bacteria or if differences in oxygen concentrations are skewing the data. Nonetheless, the role of NO/H-NOX in biofilm formation is of clinical relevance because pathogenic bacteria such as L. pneumophilia78 and V. cholerae79,80 utilize biofilms to either enhance their infectivity or facilitate their persistence and they code for NO/H-NOX signaling pathways. In future studies it would be interesting to determine if these NO/H-NOX signaling pathways play a role a mediating bacterial infectivity.

Furthermore, although H-NOX has been shown to the primary NO sensor in some bacteria, there are many bacteria, including most pathogens, that lack an H-NOX domain but are still NO responsive. Multiple NO responsive regulatory proteins have been identified and characterized, but their responsive pathways are primarily involved in NO detoxification,81,82 rather than regulating various bacterial processes in an NO dependent manner. As a result, the identity of the putative primary NO sensor and its subsequent responsive signaling pathways are all still unknown in these bacteria, and the molecular mechanisms by which NO regulates these signaling pathways are poorly understood. This area of research, however, is currently expanding as further studies are being conducted in the hope of elucidating the primary NO sensor and the NO responsive pathways in these bacteria. These studies will be of significance as identifying the putative NO sensor protein will not only reveal how NO signaling may function in these bacteria, but will also identify responsive pathways which could then be utilized as novel drug targets for those bacteria that are pathogenic to humans in the future.

Finally, although this review has focused on H-NOX detection of low (sub-micromolar) NO concentrations, it is important to note that bacteria respond to a wide range of NO concentrations. Generally speaking, from the current data, it seems that bacteria detect higher concentrations of NO to initiate NO elimination pathways1721 and lower concentrations to regulate motility and group behaviors.43,44,55,61 Recent studies have shown, however, that in some bacteria (as is the case in Paracoccus denitrificans) NO detoxification proteins have nanomolar affinities for NO, enabling NO detoxification systems to be active at sub-micromolar concentrations of NO.83 Conversely, higher concentrations of NO have been shown to affect biofilm formation.32,77 It is possible that the activation of NO detoxification pathways at low concentrations is not exclusively for NO elimination, and/or that biofilm regulation at high NO levels is a defense mechanism. Most likely there is a continuum between detoxification and non-toxic signaling responses that depend on the bacteria or environment. These findings hint at the complexity of NO signaling in bacteria, and how much remains to be discovered.

Footnotes

1

The abbreviations used are: NO, nitric oxide; CO, carbon monoxide; H-NOX, heme-nitric oxide/oxygen-binding protein; HaCE, H-NOX-associated cyclic-di-GMP processing enzyme; HaHK, H-NOX-associated histidine kinase; HqsK, H-NOX-associated quorum sensing kinase; ATP, adenosine-5’-triphosphate; GTP, guanosine-5’-triphosphate; GMP, guanosine-5’-monophosphate; c-GMP or cyclic GMP, guanosine-3’,5’-cyclic monophosphate; c-di-GMP or cyclic-di-GMP, bis-(3’-5’)-cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate; pGpG, 5’-phosphoguanylyl-(3’-5’)-guanosine; GGDEF, conserved amino acids in the catalytic sites of diguanylate cyclases (the domain containing these conserved residues is often termed a GGDEF domain); EAL, conserved amino acids in the catalytic site of some phosphodiesterases (the domain containing these conserved residues is often termed an EAL domain); HD-GYP, conserved amino acids in the catalytic site of some phosphodiesterases (the domain containing these conserved residues is often termed an HD-GYP domain); HTH, helix-turn-helix domain, common in transcription factors; NOS, nitric oxide synthase; Hpt, Histidine-containing phosphotransfer protein; sGC, soluble guanylate cyclase; PAS, PER-ARNT-SIM domain containing protein; Fur, ferric iron uptake regulator; OMFP, 3-O-methylfluorescein phosphate; QS, quorum sensing; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy; iTRAQ, isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification; TSM, Trichodesmium erythraeum spent medium.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wang Y, Ruby EG. The roles of NO in microbial symbioses. Cell. Microbiol. 2011;13:518–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01576.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fang FC. Antimicrobial reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: concepts and controversies. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004;2:820–832. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ignarro LJ, Cirino G, Casini A, Napoli C. Nitric Oxide as a Signaling Molecule in the Vascular System: An Overview. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1999;34:879–886. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199912000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bredt DS, Snyder SH. Nitric oxide, a novel neuronal messenger. Neuron. 1992;8:3–11. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90104-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rao M, Smith BC, Marletta A. Nitric Oxide Mediates Biofilm Formation and Symbiosis in Silicibacter. MBio. 2015;6:1–10. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00206-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Crane BR, Sudhamsu J, Patel Ba. Bacterial nitric oxide synthases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010;79:445–470. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062608-103436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Derbyshire ER. Biochemistry of Soluble Guanylate Cyclase. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2009;191:17–31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-68964-5_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Davidson SK, Koropatnick TA, Kossmehl R, Sycuro L, McFall-Ngai MJ. NO means “yes” in the squid-vibrio symbiosis: Nitric oxide (NO) during the initial stages of a beneficial association. Cell. Microbiol. 2004;6:1139–1151. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00429.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.MacMicking J, Xie Q, Nathan C. Nitric oxide and macrophage function. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997;15:323–350. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bogdan C. Nitric oxide and the immune response. Nat. Immunol. 2001;2:907–916. doi: 10.1038/ni1001-907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Connelly L, Palacios-Callender M, Ameixa C, Moncada S, Hobbs AJ. Biphasic Regulation of NF-B Activity Underlies the Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Actions of Nitric Oxide. J. Immunol. 2001;166:3873–3881. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.6.3873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L. Central control of breathing in mammals: neuronal circuitry, membrane properties, and neurotransmitters. Physiol. Rev. 1995;75:1–45. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1995.75.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Poole RK. Nitric oxide and nitrosative stress tolerance in bacteria. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005;33:176–180. doi: 10.1042/BST0330176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cruz-ramos H, Crack J, Wu G, Hughes MN, Scott C, Thomson AJ, Green J, Poole RK. NO sensing by FNR: regulation of the Escherichia coli NO-detoxifying flavohaemoglobin, Hmp. EMBO J. 2002;21:3235–3244. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.D’Autréaux B, Tucker NP, Dixon R, Spiro S. A non-haem iron centre in the transcription factor NorR senses nitric oxide. Nature. 2005;437:769–772. doi: 10.1038/nature03953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bodenmiller DM, Spiro S. The yjeB (nsrR) Gene of Escherichia coli Encodes a Nitric Oxide-Sensitive Transcriptional Regulator The yjeB (nsrR) Gene of Escherichia coli Encodes a Nitric Oxide-Sensitive Transcriptional Regulator. J. Bacteriol. 2006;188:874–881. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.3.874-881.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stevanin TM, Poole RK, Demoncheaux EAG, Read RC. Flavohemoglobin Hmp protects Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium from nitric oxide-related killing by human macrophages. Infect. Immun. 2002;70:4399–4405. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.8.4399-4405.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Poole RK, Hughes MN. New functions for the ancient globin family: Bacterial responses to nitric oxide and nitrosative stress. Mol. Microbiol. 2000;36:775–783. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01889.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gardner AM, Helmick RA, Gardner PR. Flavorubredoxin, an inducible catalyst for nitric oxide reduction and detoxification in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:8172–8177. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110471200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mills PC, Rowley G, Spiro S, Hinton JC, Richardson DJ. A combination of cytochrome c nitrite reductase (NrfA) and flavorubredoxin (NorV) protects Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium against killing by NO in anoxic environments. Microbiology. 2008;154:1218–1228. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/014290-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stevanin TM, Moir JWB, Read RC. Nitric oxide detoxification systems enhance survival of Neisseria meningitidis in human macrophages and in nasopharyngeal mucosa. Infect. Immun. 2005;73:3322–3329. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3322-3329.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pellicena P, Karow DS, Boon EM, Marletta Ma, Kuriyan J. Crystal structure of an oxygen-binding heme domain related to soluble guanylate cyclases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004;101:12854–12859. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405188101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Karow DS, Pan D, Tran R, Pellicena P, Presley A, Mathies RA, Marletta MA. Spectroscopic Characterization of the Soluble Guanylate Cyclase-like Heme Domains from Vibrio cholerae and Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis. Biochemistry. 2004;43:10203–10211. doi: 10.1021/bi049374l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Plate L, Marletta MA. Nitric oxide-sensing H-NOX proteins govern bacterial communal behavior. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2013;38:566–575. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boon EM, Davis JH, Tran R, Karow DS, Huang SH, Pan D, Miazgowicz MM, Mathies RA, Marletta MA. Nitric oxide binding to prokaryotic homologs of the soluble guanylate cyclase beta1 H-NOX domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:21892–21902. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600557200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hespen CW, Bruegger JJ, Phillips-Piro CM, Marletta MA. Structural and Functional Evidence Indicates Selective Oxygen Signaling in Caldanaerobacter subterraneus H-NOX. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016 doi: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00431. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stone JR, Marletta MA. Spectral and kinetic studies on the activation of soluble guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide. Biochemistry. 1996;35:1093–1099. doi: 10.1021/bi9519718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhao Y, Brandish P, Ballou D, Marletta MA. A Molecular Basis for Nitric Oxide Sensing by Soluble Guanylate Cyclase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999;96:14753–14758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.14753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Arora DP, Boon EM. Nitric oxide regulated two-component signaling in Pseudoalteromonas atlantica. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012;421:521–526. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boon EM, Marletta Ma. Ligand specificity of H-NOX domains: from sGC to bacterial NO sensors. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2005;99:892–902. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Boon EM, Marletta MA. Ligand discrimination in soluble guanylate cyclase and the H-NOX family of heme sensor proteins. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005;9:441–446. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Arora DP, Hossain S, Xu Y, Boon EM. Nitric Oxide Regulation of Bacterial Biofilms. Biochemistry. 2015;54:3717–3728. doi: 10.1021/bi501476n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Iyer LM, Anantharaman V, Aravind L. Ancient conserved domains shared by animal soluble guanylyl cyclases and bacterial signaling proteins. BMC Genomics. 2003;4:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-4-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McDougald D, Rice Sa, Barraud N, Steinberg PD, Kjelleberg S. Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012;10:39–50. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ryan RP, Fouhy Y, Lucey JF, Crossman LC, Spiro S, He Y-W, Zhang L-H, Heeb S, Cámara M, Williams P, Dow JM. Cell-cell signaling in Xanthomonas campestris involves an HD-GYP domain protein that functions in cyclic di-GMP turnover. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103:6712–6717. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600345103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 36.Romling U, Galperin MY, Gomelsky M. Cyclic di-GMP: the First 25 Years of a Universal Bacterial. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013;77:1–52. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00043-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bhinu VS. Insight into Biofi lm-Associated. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005;10:15–21. doi: 10.1159/000090344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lindsay D, Von Holy A. Bacterial biofilms within the clinical setting: what healthcare professionals should know. J. Hosp. Infect. 2006;64:313–325. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wenzel RP. Health Care – Associated Infections: Major Issues in the Early Years of the 21st Century. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007;45:85–88. doi: 10.1086/518136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001;358:135–138. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hoiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Givskov M, Molin S, Ciofu O. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2010;35:322–332. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Barraud N, Hassett DJ, Hwang S-H, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S, Webb JS. Involvement of nitric oxide in biofilm dispersal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2006;188:7344–7353. doi: 10.1128/JB.00779-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Carlson HK, Vance RE, Marletta MA. H-NOX regulation of c-di-GMP metabolism and biofilm formation in Legionella pneumophila. Mol. Microbiol. 2010;77:930–942. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07259.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Niu L, Xu Y, Hossain S, Huang N, Coursolle D, Gralnick JA, Boon EM. Nitric Oxide Regulation of Cyclic di-GMP Synthesis and Hydrolysis in Shewanella woodyi. Biochemistry. 2012;51:2087–2099. doi: 10.1021/bi201753f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lahiri T, Luan B, Raleigh DP, Boon EM. A structural basis for the regulation of an H-NOX-associated cyclic-di-GMP synthase/phosphodiesterase enzyme by nitric oxide-bound H-NOX. Biochemistry. 2014;53:2126–2135. doi: 10.1021/bi401597m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Underbakke ES, Iavarone AT, Marletta MA. Higher-order interactions bridge the nitric oxide receptor and catalytic domains of soluble guanylate cyclase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110:6777–6782. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301934110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Underbakke ES, Iavarone AT, Chalmers MJ, Pascal BD, Novick S, Griffin PR, Marletta Ma. Nitric Oxide-Induced Conformational Changes in Soluble Guanylate Cyclase. Struct. Des. 2014;22:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2014.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Beier D, Gross R. Regulation of bacterial virulence by two-component systems. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2006;9:143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Laub MT, Biondi EG, Skerker JM. Phosphotransfer profiling: systematic mapping of two-component signal transduction pathways and phosphorelays. Methods Enzymol. 2007;423:531–548. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)23026-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Elsen S, Colbeau A. Interaction between the H 2 Sensor HupUV and the Histidine Kinase HupT Controls HupSL Hydrogenase Synthesis in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Bacteriol. 2003;185:7111–7119. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.24.7111-7119.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Szurmant H, Bu L, III CLB, Hoch JA. An essential sensor histidine kinase controlled by transmembrane helix interactions with its auxiliary proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008;105:5891–5896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800247105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ortiz de Orue Lucana D, Groves MR. The three-component signalling system HbpS--SenS--SenR as an example of a redox sensing pathway in bacteria. Amin. Acids. 2009;37:479–486. doi: 10.1007/s00726-009-0260-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Price MS, Chao L, Marletta MA. Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 H-NOX Regulation of a Histidine Kinase by Nitric Oxide. Biochemistry. 2007;46:13677–13683. doi: 10.1021/bi7019035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Herzik MA, Jonnalagadda R, Kuriyan J, Marletta MA. Structural insights into the role of iron-histidine bond cleavage in nitric oxide-induced activation of H-NOX gas sensor proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014;111:E4156–E4164. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416936111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Plate L, Marletta MA. Nitric oxide modulates bacterial biofilm formation through a multicomponent cyclic-di-GMP signaling network. Mol. Cell. 2012;46:449–460. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Thormann KM, Saville RM, Shukla S, Spormann AM. Induction of rapid detachment in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 2005;187:1014–1021. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.3.1014-1021.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Plate L, Marletta MA. Phosphorylation-dependent derepression by the response regulator HnoC in the Shewanella oneidensis nitric oxide signaling network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110:E4648–E4657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318128110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mukhopadhyay R, Sudasinghe N, Schaub T, Yukl ET. Heme-Independent Redox Sensing by the Heme-Nitric Oxide/Oxygen Binding Protein (H-NOX) from Vibrio cholerae. J. Biol. Chem. 2016 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.733337. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tsai AL, Berka V, Martin F, Ma X, Van Den Akker F, Fabian M, Olson JS. Is nostoc H-NOX a no sensor or redox switch? Biochemistry. 2010;49:6587–6599. doi: 10.1021/bi1002234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gao R, Mack TR, Stock AM. Bacterial response regulators: versatile regulatory strategies from common domains. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2007;32:225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Henares BM, Higgins KE, Boon EM. Discovery of a Nitric Oxide Responsive Quorum Sensing Circuit in Vibrio harveyi. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012;7:1331–1336. doi: 10.1021/cb300215t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ng W-L, Bassler B. Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Network Architectures. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009;43:197–222. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Henares BM, Xu Y, Boon EM. A nitric oxide-responsive quorum sensing circuit in Vibrio harveyi regulates flagella production and biofilm formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013;14:16473–16484. doi: 10.3390/ijms140816473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Barak R, Eisenbach M. Correlation between phosphorylation of the chemotaxis protein CheY and its activity at the flagellar motor. Biochemistry. 1992;31:1821–1826. doi: 10.1021/bi00121a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Clegg DO, Koshland DE. The role of a signaling protein in bacterial sensing: behavioral effects of increased gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1984;81:5056–5060. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.16.5056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ravid S, Matsumura P, Eisenbach M. Restoration of flagellar clockwise rotation in bacterial envelopes by insertion of the chemotaxis protein CheY. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1986;83:7157–7161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.19.7157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wolfe AJ, Conley MP, Kramer TJ, Bergt HC. of Signaling in Bacterial Chemotaxis. Strain. 1987;169:1878–1885. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.5.1878-1885.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wang Y, Dufour YS, Carlson HK, Donohue TJ, Marletta Ma, Ruby EG. H-NOX-mediated nitric oxide sensing modulates symbiotic colonization by Vibrio fischeri. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010;107:8375–8380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003571107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chen Z, Lewis KA, Shultzaberger RK, Lyakhov IG, Zheng M, Doan B, Storz G, Schneider TD. Discovery of Fur binding site clusters in Escherichia coli by information theory models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:6762–6777. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Waters CM, Bassler BL. Quorum Sensing: Communication in Bacteria. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005;21:319–346. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Proctor LM, Gunsalus RP. Anaerobic respiratory growth of Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio fischeri and Photobacterium leiognathi with trimethylamine N-oxide, nitrate and fumarate: Ecological implications. Environ. Microbiol. 2000;2:399–406. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00121.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Nealson K, Hastings J. Bacterial Bioluminescence: Its Control and Ecological Significance. Microbiol. Rev. 1979;43:496–518. doi: 10.1128/mr.43.4.496-518.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Owens L, Busico-Salcedo N. Vibrio harveyi: pretty problems in paradise. Indian J. Virol. an Off. organ Indian Virol. Soc. 2006;24:180–187. doi: 10.1007/s13337-013-0136-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Vidgen M, Carson J, Higgins M, Owens L. Changes to the phenotypic profile of Vibrio harveyi when infected with the Vibrio harveyi myovirus-like (VHML) bacteriophage. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006;100:481–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02829.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Stabili L, Gravili C, Piraino S, Boero F, Alifano P. Vibrio harveyi associated with Aglaophenia octodonta (Hydrozoa, Cnidaria) Microb. Ecol. 2006;52:603–608. doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Defoirdt T, Sorgeloos P. Monitoring of Vibrio harveyi quorum sensing activity in real time during infection of brine shrimp larvae. ISME J. 2012;6:2314–2319. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Barraud N, Kelso MJ, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S. Nitric Oxide: A Key Mediator of Biofilm Dispersal with Applications in Infectious Diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015;21:31–42. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140905112822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Abu Khweek A, Fernández Dávila NS, Caution K, Akhter A, Abdulrahman BA, Tazi M, Hassan H, Novotny La, Bakaletz LO, Amer AO. Biofilm-derived Legionella pneumophila evades the innate immune response in macrophages. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013;3:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Davies BW, Bogard RW, Dupes NM, Gerstenfeld TAI, Simmons LA, Mekalanos JJ. DNA damage and reactive nitrogen species are barriers to Vibrio cholerae colonization of the infant mouse intestine. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Stern AM, Hay AJ, Liu Z, Desland FA, Zhang J, Zhong Z, Zhu J. The NorR regulon is critical for Vibrio cholerae resistance to nitric oxide and sustained colonization of the intestines. MBio. 2012;3:1–8. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00013-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Spiro S. Regulators of bacterial responses to nitric oxide. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2007;31:193–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Rodionov DA, Dubchak IL, Arkin AP, Alm EJ, Gelfand MS. Dissimilatory metabolism of nitrogen oxides in bacteria: Comparative reconstruction of transcriptional networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2005;1:0415–0431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hassan J, Bergaust LL, Molstad L, de Vries S, Bakken LR. Homeostatic control of NO at nanomolar concentrations in denitrifying bacteria - modelling and experimental determination of nitric oxide reductase kinetics in vivo in Paracoccus denitrificans. Environ. Microbiol. 2015:1–38. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES