Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2016 Nov 10;138(48):15690–15698. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b09853

A Trojan-Horse Peptide-Carboxymethyl-Cytidine Antibiotic from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens

Marina Serebryakova †,, Darya Tsibulskaya , Olga Mokina §,, Alexey Kulikovsky §,, Manesh Nautiyal , Arthur Van Aerschot , Konstantin Severinov §,†,#,*, Svetlana Dubiley §,
PMCID: PMC5152938  PMID: 27934031

Abstract

graphic file with name ja-2016-09853a_0007.jpg

Microcin C and related antibiotics are Trojan-horse peptide-adenylates. The peptide part is responsible for facilitated transport inside the sensitive cell, where it gets processed to release a toxic warhead—a nonhydrolyzable aspartyl-adenylate, which inhibits aspartyl-tRNA synthetase. Adenylation of peptide precursors is carried out by MccB THIF-type NAD/FAD adenylyltransferases. Here, we describe a novel microcin C-like compound from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. The B. amyloliquefaciens MccB demonstrates an unprecedented ability to attach a terminal cytidine monophosphate to cognate precursor peptide in cellular and cell free systems. The cytosine moiety undergoes an additional modification—carboxymethylation—that is carried out by the C-terminal domain of MccB and the MccS enzyme that produces carboxy-SAM, which serves as a donor of the carboxymethyl group. We show that microcin C-like compounds carrying terminal cytosines are biologically active and target aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, and that the carboxymethyl group prevents resistance that can occur due to modification of the warhead. The results expand the repertoire of known enzymatic modifications of peptides that can be used to obtain new biological activities while avoiding or limiting bacterial resistance.

Introduction

Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) with attached adenine residues form a family of Trojan-horse antibiotics encoded by gene clusters present in diverse bacteria.1 Here, we show that one such RiPP cluster actually directs biosynthesis of an unprecedented cytidylated peptide, which is biologically active and has modifications that allow it to overcome a resistance mechanism that effectively detoxifies related adenylated peptide antibiotics. The data underscore how limited is our knowledge about diversity of RiPP modifications performed by evolutionarily related enzymes. This information can be used for creation of new antibiotics while avoiding or limiting bacterial resistance.

Trojan-horse antibiotic microcin C (McC) is a peptide-adenylate produced by some strains of Escherichia coli. McC-producing cells carry a plasmid-borne six-gene mcc biosynthesis/self-immunity cluster (Figure 1A). The ribosomally synthesized McC precursor heptapeptide MRTGNAN, the product of mccAEco gene, is adenylated by MccBEco, a THIF-type NAD/FAD adenylyltransferase that attaches AMP to the C-terminal Asn residue of MccAEco via a phosphoramidate bond.2 The reaction proceeds through formation of a succinimide intermediate and requires two ATP molecules.3 As a result of modification the terminal asparagine residue of the peptide is converted to an aspartate-adenylate with phosphoramidate linkage. The products of the mccDEco and mccEEco genes jointly are responsible for an additional decoration of the phosphate of adenylated MccAEco with aminopropyl group,4 increasing the bioactivity.5 McC is exported from the producing cell by the MccCEco pump.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mcc-like operon from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DSM7 and its products. (A) The structure of mcc clusters from E. coli and B. amyloliquefaciens is schematically presented. Arrows represent genes and are colored according to validated (E. coli) or predicted (B. amyloliquefaciens) functions of their products. (B) MALDI MS analysis of B. subtilis cell lysates. Upper panel shows the background signals from B. subtilis cells bearing empty pHT01 plasmid. Lower panel shows the additional difference mass peaks detected in B. subtilis cells carrying plasmid-borne mccBam cluster. Series of peaks derived from N-terminally formylated MccABam are marked in red; peaks, corresponding to deformylated MccABam peptide and its post-translationally modified forms are marked in blue. m/z 2251.3 and 2279.3 correspond to peptide-succinimides, m/z 2269.3 and 2297.3 to unmodified MccABam, m/z 2574.4 and 2602.4 correspond to cytidylated peptide, m/z 2632.4 and 2660.5 correspond to MccABam modified with an unidentified nucleotide. (C) Fragments of MS/MS spectra of parent mass-ions 2574.4 and 2632.4 shown in (B) are presented. Both spectra contain m/z 2269 peaks corresponding to the peptide part of the compounds and additional peaks indicating nucleotide monophosphate modification on its C-end terminus. Mass shift of 111 Da on the upper pannel (m/z 2574 to m/z 2463) matches cytosine while mass shift of 169 Da on the lower panel (m/z 2632 to m/z 2463) does not correspond to any known nucleobase. “HPO3” and “Rib.” stand for phosphate and ribose loss, respectively.

The peptide part of McC is responsible for the import into sensitive E. coli cells through the YejABEF transporter.6 Inside the host cells McC undergoes proteolysis by cellular aminopeptidases, which causes the release of processed McC—a nonhydrolyzable aspartyl-adenylate that binds aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (Asp-RS) and inhibits it, leading to cessation of protein synthesis.7 The products of mccEEco and mccFEco contribute to self-immunity by acetylating processed McC and cleaving the amidate bond connecting the terminal aspartate and AMP, respectively.8,9 Stand-alone cellular homologues of MccE and MccF that are not part of mcc operon also contribute to basal levels of McC resistance.10,11

Bioinformatics searches revealed mcc-like operons in diverse Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.12,13 Some of predicted MccB-MccA pairs were subsequently validated in vitro by demonstrating that recombinant MccB proteins adenylate cognate precursor peptides and the resulting compounds inhibit bacterial growth by the same mechanism as E. coli McC.14 Many of the validated mcc clusters contain just three genes, mccABC. Such minimal arrangement is apparently sufficient to produce a toxic adenylated peptide without additional decorations and export it outside the producing cells.

The mccD, mccF, and mccE homologues are detected in only a few of non-E. coli mcc clusters. On the other hand, some mcc operons contain diverse additional genes that are absent from the prototypic E. coli operon. These genes may contribute to self-immunity or be responsible for additional modifications of the basic peptide-adenylate scaffold.

A group of microcin C-like RiPP clusters from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DSM7, Streptococcus bovis JB1, and various strains of Yersinia sp. and Serratia sp. is characterized by an extended mccB gene and the presence of an additional gene mccS. The simplest of these gene clusters mccBam, from B. amyloliquefaciens DSM7, consists of four genes, mccABam, mccBBam (BAMF_RS40475), mccSBam (BAMF_RS29790), and mccCBam (BAMF_RS29795) (Figure 1A). Here we show that MccBBam performs an unprecedented reaction of cytidylation of the terminal residue of cognate MccABam. We further show that MccSBam cooperates with the C-terminal methyltransferase domain of MccBBam to attach carboxymethyl to the base of the cytidine moiety. We finally show that peptide-cytidylates inhibit aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, leading to cessation of cell growth. The presence of carboxymethyl modifications inactivates the self-immunity/resistance mechanism mediated by MccE. Our results underscore the diversity of modifications carried out by RiPP biosynthesis machinery and may provide new tools for rational design of novel antibacterial compounds.

Results

Prediction and Validation of the mcc Gene Cluster from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DSM7

The MccBEco homologue from B. amyloliquefaciens DSM7 was identified earlier.13 Unlike most other MccB proteins, MccBBam contains, in addition to the N-terminal adenylyltransferase part, a ∼30 kDa C-terminal extension (MccBCTDBam) homologous to SAM-dependent methyltransferases. The mccBBam gene is followed by mccSBam, whose product is homologous to carboxy-S-adenosyl-l-methionine (cxSAM) synthetase CmoA of E. coli. A gene encoding the export pump of the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) mccCBam is located downstream of mccSBam. In most validated mcc clusters the precursor peptide-encoding mccA genes are located upstream of mccB to ensure an optimal ratio of production of the peptide and its cognate adenylyltranferase14 (Figure 1A). However, no mccA-like gene upstream to mccBBam was found. Visual inspection of the extended mccS-mccC intergenic region identified a short open reading frame encoding a 19-amino acid peptide MLKIRKVKIVRAQNGHYTN. This peptide contains a terminal asparagine and may be a putative MccABam.

To check if any McC-like compounds are produced by B. amyloliquefaciens DSM7 we performed mass-spectrometric analysis of cell lysates and conditioned media after growth under various conditions. A mass-ion of predicted MccABam peptide (m/z 2269.3) or its adenylated form (m/z 2598.4) along with mass-ions corresponding to species with N-formylated peptide and, possibly, forms carrying additional modifications were expected. However, no such peaks were observed. We therefore next cloned the entire mccBam cluster into multicopy pHT01 plasmid and introduced it into a surrogate host B. subtilis 168. Mass-spectrometric analysis of transformed cells revealed a series of peaks some of which could have been the products of the B. amyloliquefaciens mcc cluster (Figure 1B). There were [MH+] signals corresponding to predicted MccABam peptide in N-formylated (2297.3) and deformylated (2269.3) forms. There were also peaks of corresponding succinimide intermediates (2251.3 and 2279.3) that should be produced at the first step of MccB-catalyzed reaction.3 However, peaks corresponding to adenylated MccABam (329 Da shift from unmodified peptide peaks) were not observed. Instead, peaks with 305 and 363 Da shifts were present. MS/MS analysis of these compounds unambiguously showed that they contain terminally modified MccABam (Figure 1C). Fragmentation of the m/z 2574.4 compound resulted in major daughter ions corresponding to unmodified MccABam (m/z 2269) and its dehydrated form (m/z 2251). Signals matching MccABam-phosphate (m/z 2331) and MccABam-phosphate-ribose (m/z 2463) were also clearly seen. Therefore, the putative nucleobase of the m/z 2574.4 compound has a molecular weight of 111 Da. Analysis of fragmentation spectrum of the m/z 2602.4 compound, which produces a 2279 daughter ion matching N-formylated MccABam, led to the same conclusion. In contrast, fragmentation of the m/z 2632.4 compound suggested a 169 Da putative nucleobase mass. While neither calculated mass difference matched adenine (135 Da), the 111 Da mass shift matches cytosine. The 169 Da mass change might correspond to an unknown or modified known nucleobase.

MccBBam Exhibits Unusual Nucleotide Specificity

To check if MccBBam indeed modifies the precursor peptide with CMP, recombinant MccBBam protein was prepared and combined with chemically synthesized MccABam peptide in the presence of ATP, CTP, UTP, or GTP. Mass-spectrometric analysis revealed the presence of the peptide (m/z 2269.3) and succinimide intermediate (m/z 2251.3) peaks in all four reactions (Figure 2A). Peaks corresponding to peptide–nucleotides were also detected. The apparent efficiency of in vitro modification decreased in the order CTP ≫ ATP ∼ UTP ≫ GTP. If the reaction was carried out in the presence of all four nucleotide triphosphates, only the MccABam-CMP product was detected (Figure 2A, lower panel). The observed preference for CTP is consistent with detection of MccABam-CMP in the B. subtilis surrogate production host.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Nucleotide specificity of E. coli and B. amyloliquefaciens MccB nucleotidyltransferases in in vitro reactions. (A) MccBBam was combined with MccABam (m/z 2269.3) in the presence of indicated individual NTPs or an equimolar mixture of four NTPs (“+NTP”). The reaction products were analyzed by MALDI MS. On mass spectra shown, the differences between the parental peptide mass peak (m/z 2269.3) and peptidyl-nucleotide products are indicated. The m/z 2251.3 peak is the parental peptide carrying terminal succinimide. (B). As in (A) but MccBNTDBam, an MccBBam derivative lacking the C-terminal domain was used instead of MccBBam. (C) Reaction products formed in the presence of MccBEco and MccAEco (m/z 763.4). (D) As in (C) but using formylated MccAEco (m/z 791.5). The peaks of sodium salt of MccAEco and its peptydyl-adenilates are marked with asterisks.

The unexpected nucleotide preference of MccBBam could have been caused by the presence of an additional domain MccBCTDBam that is absent from the E. coli and most other homologues. The N-terminal fragment of MccBBam lacking the methyltransferase domain was prepared and its ability to modify cognate MccA peptide was investigated. The mutant, MccBNTDBam, variant exhibited the same promiscuity toward NTP substrates (Figure 2B), indicating that the C-terminal domain is not involved in substrate specificity modulation.

Intrigued by substrate promiscuity of the MccBBam we tested if MccBEco also can modify its cognate peptide MccAEco MRTGNAN with various nucleotides. Under our reaction conditions, only adenylated peptide was observed (Figure 2C). Yet, when we tested formylated MccAEco, which should be considered as a bona fide ribosomally synthesized MccBEco substrate, modification products by each of the four individual nucleotides were observed (Figure 2D). However, the preference to ATP was retained when the enzyme was combined with an equimolar mixture of all four nucleotides (Figure 2D, lower spectrum).

MccSBam and MccBCTDBam Are Responsible for Additional Modification of Peptidyl-Cytidylate

MccSBam is a homologue of the E. coli cxSAM-synthase CmoA. CmoA uses SAM and prephenate to produce cxSAM,15,16 which is then used by the second enzyme, CmoB, as a donor of carboxymethyl group in the reaction of carboxymethylation of 5-hydroxyuridine in wobble positions of various tRNAs.15,17 We hypothesized that MccSBam and MccBCTDBam can also act as a synthase-transferase pair and modify the peptide cytidylated by MccBNTDBam. Indeed, the observed mass difference of 58 Da between cytidylated MccABam peptide (m/z 2574.4) and another peptide–nucleotide (m/z 2632.4) detected in B. subtilis (Figure 1B) matches carboxymethylation. To test this hypothesis, we determined whether (i) MccSBam can produce cxSAM from SAM and prephenate and (ii) MccBCTDBam can use cxSAM to carboxymethylate MccABam-CMP.

Upon incubation of MccSBam or E. coli CmoA with SAM and prephenate, a new peak appeared during HPLC separation of reaction products that was absent from the mixture of SAM and prephenate incubated without added proteins (compare the trace shown in Figure 3A with those shown in Figures 3BC). The same peak was observed among the multiple products of a reference reaction of where cxSAM was chemcially synthesized from S-adenosylhomocysteine and iodoacetic acid15,18 (Figure 3D). In all cases, these HPLC peaks contained a substance with [MH+] of 443.2, which matches cxSAM. The main signals in fragmentation spectra of these mass-ions were those of adenine (m/z 136) and its complementary part (m/z 308); adenosine (m/z 250) and its complementary part (m/z 192); and the 3-amino-3-carboxypropyl tail of methionine (m/z 102) and its complementary part (m/z 342) (Figure 3E). Since the adenosine moiety of the [MH+] 443.2 compound was not modified, the methionine part must have been carboxylated. Since 3-amino-3-carboxypropyl tail was not modified, the carboxylic group must be attached to the S-methyl group of the methionine moiety. We therefore conclude that MccSBam indeed synthesizes carboxy-S-adenosyl-l-methionine from SAM and prephenate, and is therefore a functional analog of E. coli CmoA.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

MccSBam synthesizes cxSAM which is used as a donor of carboxymethyl group during modification of MccABam-CMP by MccBCTDBam. Left sides of panels (A–D) show HPLC traces of cxSAM synthesis reactions products. (A) A mixture of SAM and prephenate without enzyme addition. (B) SAM and prephenate incubated with MccSBam. (C) SAM and prephenate incubated with E. coli CmoA. (D) Chemical synthesis of cxSAM from SAH and iodoacetic acid. Collected HPLC fractions used for in vitro modification of MccABam-CMP with MccBBam are marked with dashed lines. On the right of each panel MALDI MS spectra of reactions products obtained after incubation of MccABam-CMP (m/z 2574.4) with recombinant MccBBam and material from the indicated HPLC fractions are shown. The newly appearing m/z 2632.4 mass peak matches that obtained in B. subtilis cells carrying plasmid-borne mccBam cluster (Figure 1B). (E) A representative fragmentation spectrum of m/z 443.2 parental ion from HPLC fractions indicated in (B–D). m/z peaks of complementing cxSAM fragments are shown in same colors. For details of peaks interpretation see text. (F) MALDI MS analysis of MccABam-CMP carboxymethylation reaction by recombinant MccBCTDBam in the presence of cxSAM.

We next tested if MccBBam can use cxSAM to modify the cytidine moiety of MccABam-CMP. When purified peptidyl-cytidylate and full-sized MccBBam were combined with enzymatically prepared or chemically synthesized cxSAM, an m/z = 2632.4 mass-ion appeared indicating that conversion of the MccABam-CMP to MccABam-carboxymetylated CMP (-cxCMP) had taken place (Figure 3B–D, right panels). Fragmentation patterns of the newly synthesized compounds matched that of m/z 2632.4 compound produced in B. subtilis (Figure 1C, lower panel), suggesting that carboxymethylation of peptidyl-cytidylate takes place both in vivo and in vitro.

We tested if MccBCTDBam alone is sufficient for transferring the carboxymethyl moiety from cxSAM to peptidyl-cytidylate. As can be seen from Figure 3F, MccBCTDBam successfully caboxymethylated the purified MccABam-CMP in the presence of cxSAM. When MccABam-AMP, MccABam-UMP, and MccABam-GMP were tested in reactions with MccBCTDBam and cxSAM, no modification was observed (data not shown), indicating that this modification is specific for cytidine.

The entire biosynthesis pathway of MccABam-cxCMP was reconstituted in vitro in the presence of MccABam, MccBBam, MccSBam, CTP, SAM, and prephenic acid (Figure S1). Omission of either component led to the disappearance of the MccABam-cxCMP product peak. The MccABam-cxCMP was, however, present, when E. coli cxSAM synthase CmoA was used instead of MccSBam in the coupled MccABam modification reaction (Figure S1). The peak corresponding to MccABam-cxCMP was absent when MccBNTDBam was used instead of full-sized MccBBam. Overall, the data clearly show that MccBCTDBam is carboxymethyl transferase that uses cxSAM produced by MccS to modify MccABam cytidylated by MccBNTDBam.

In Vivo and In Vitro Activity of Peptide-Cytidylates

Attempts to detect biological activity of in vitro synthesized McCBam, with or without the carboxymethyl modification, were unsuccessful. Neither B. subtilis 168 nor several E. coli strains appeared to be sensitive to these compounds. At least in the case of E. coli, the result could be due to poor intracellular transport, lack of processing, or the absence of appropriate target. The serendipitous observation about decreased nucleotide specificity of MccBEco when presented with formylated cognate peptide substrate allowed us to obtain, in addition to fMccAEco-AMP, the fMccAEco-CMP, fMccAEco-UMP, and fMccAEco-GMP compounds. An MccAEco-cxCMP variant was also prepared by in vitro carboxymethylation of fMccAEco-CMP with the MccBCTDBam-MccSBam pair (Figure S2). The resulting compounds contained the E. coli fMccA transport peptide that in the context of AMP modification is recognized by the YejABEF transporter6 and is efficiently processed by intracellular aminopeptidases.19 Each of the compounds was tested against a wild-type E. coli strain and isogenic yej mutant in the spot bioactivity test. An sbmA mutant lacking a transporter that is not involved in McCEco transport was included as a control. As can be seen in Figure 4A, MccAEco-AMP, MccAEco-CMP, and MccAEco-cxCMP inhibited the growth of wild-type and sbmA strains. The MIC values determined using spot bioactivity test were 1, 40, and 20 μM for MccAEco-AMP, MccAEco-CMP, and MccAEco-cxCMP, respectively. The growth of the yej mutant was unaffected.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Biological activity of peptidyl-cytidylates. (A) Five microliters of 50 μM solutions of HPLC-purified peptidyl-nucleotides were deposited onto lawns of E. coli B cells. Compounds tested are indicated on the top. Panels are arranged in rows showing results obtained with different tester strains: (1) wild type E. coli B; (2) E. coli B ΔyejB; (3) E. coli B ΔsbmA; (4) E. coli B overexpressing MccE; (5) E. coli B overexpressing MccF; (6) E. coli B overexpressing Asp-RS; and (7) E. coli B overexpressing Pro-RS. Growth inhibition zones are seen as clear circles on the turbid surface of cell lawn. (B) In vitro inhibition of aminoacylation of tRNAAsp by peptidyl-nucleotides. S30 extracts prepared from wild-type E. coli cells were supplied with HPLC-purified compounds and incorporation of radioactive aspartate was measured. Water was used as a blank control. Error bars show standard deviations calculated from three independent measurements.

E. coli cells that express MccE become resistant to McC due to acetylation of processed McC;8 cells that express MccF become resistant due to cleavage of intact or processed McC.9 Cells expressing MccF were resistant to both MccAEco-CMP and MccAEco-cxCMP. In contrast cells expressing MccE were resistant to MccAEco-CMP but remained sensitive to MccAEco-cxCMP (Figure 4A). Thus, carboxymethylation of cytidine moiety allows to overcome one of the two resistance mechanisms to McC-like peptide–nucleotide antibiotics.

Cells expressing Asp-RS but not Pro-RS became resistant to MccAEco-AMP, MccAEco-CMP, and MccAEco-cxCMP (Figure 4A). To directly demonstrate that peptidyl-cytidylates target Asp-RS, in vitro tRNAAsp aminoacylation reactions were carried out. An S30 E. coli extract was incubated with MccAEco-derived peptide–nucleotides to preprocess the peptide part of antibiotics and tRNAAsp aminoacylation reaction was next carried out. As can be seen from Figure 4B, MccAEco-AMP, MccAEco-CMP, and MccAEco-cxCMP inhibited incorporation of radioactive Asp in acid-insoluble fraction, while MccAEco-UMP and MccAEco-GMP were inactive. A mimic of processed MccAEco-AMP aspartyl sulfamoyl adenosine (DSA) and aspartyl sulfamoyl cytidine (DSC), a mimic of processed MccAEco-CMP, were also tested (Figure S3). Aminoacylation reactions were carried out immediately after DSA or DSC addition, since no processing is required. In both cases, inhibition of aminoacylation was observed. Both with peptidyl-nucleotides and with aminoacyl sulfamoyl nucleotides, adenylated compounds were better inhibitors than cytidylate ones.

Discussion

There are roughly a dozen of known natural cytosine-containing antibiotics,20 all of them being the products of nonribosomal synthesis. In this work we describe the first bioactive RiPP modified with cytidine. During the synthesis of E. coli microcin C the attachment of the nucleotide moiety to the peptide part is carried out by adenylyltransferase MccBEco via a two-step mechanism:3,21 first, carboxyl group of the C-terminal Asn residue of MccA is activated with ATP forming a liable peptidyl-AMP intermediate, which undergoes intramolecular cyclization resulting in the formation of peptidyl-succinimide; second, a new molecule of ATP is used for generation of stable peptidyl-nucleotide with nonhydrolyzable N–P bond. Our work reveals, surprisingly, that the MccB enzymes have relaxed specificity toward the nucleobase moiety of NTP substrate at both stages of the reaction. Thus, the nucleotide-binding site of MccB enzymes should be able to accommodate different nucleoside triphosphates substrates. It remains to be seen how such plasticity is accomplished structurally. MccBBam has a clear preference for CTP at both stages of the reaction. In contrast, MccBEco prefers ATP. Interestingly, the specificity of MccBEco is strongly modulated by the presence of the formyl group located at the other end of the peptide substrate. The mechanism of this modulation remains unknown but can be caused by more avid binding of formylated MccA to the enzyme, allowing the presumably slower reaction of modification with less preferred nucleotide to occur. MccB proteins are part of a very large family of THIF-type NAD/FAD adenylyltransferases. While many enzymes from the family were shown to function as adenylyltransferases, most have not been studied. Our work suggests that many enzymes of the family may be transferring nucleotides other than AMP, raising a possibility that there remains a very large class of post-translational modifications that remain to be discovered.

At the last stage of McCBam maturation, the C-terminal domain of MccBBam transfers the carboxymethyl group to the nucleobase of peptidyl-cytidylate using the cxSAM as a donor (Scheme 1). The cxSAM cofactor was discovered during analysis of the E. coli CmoA-CmoB enzyme pair. CmoAEco participates in modification of uridine to 5-oxyacetyl uridine (cmo5U) at the wobble position of anticodon loop of tRNAs by generating cxSAM used by the CmoB enzyme.15 CmoA-like enzyme MccSBam encoded in the mccBam cluster also synthesizes cxSAM. MccSBam can be substituted by CmoAEco during McCBam biosynthesis.

Scheme 1. Proposed McCBam Biosynthetic Pathway.

Scheme 1

N-terminal residues of MccA (MLKIRKVKIVRAQNGHYT) are denoted as R for clarity.

To the best of our knowledge, our study reveals only the second instance of the use of cxSAM in living cells. Linked genes encoding CmoA-CmoB homologues are characteristic for Proteobacteria and some Cyanobacteria,17 where they likely perform a function similar to that in E. coli, but are extremely rare in Gram-positive bacteria. The C-terminal domain of MccBBam does not show any significant similarity to CmoB from E. coli. Since it uses cxSAM for modification of cytosine instead of 5-hydroxy uridine it might employ a different mechanism for carboxymethyl transfer. In contrast to CmoBEco, MccBCTDBam has high specificity to cxSAM since no alkyl transfer was detected in the presence of SAM. Genes encoding CmoA homologues without neighboring cmoB homologues are common and our work suggests that such enzymes may produce cxSAM for nucleobase modification in bioactive compounds unrelated to tRNA.

MccBCTDBam appears to lack specificity toward the peptide part of peptide-cytidylates, which allowed us to produce carboxymethylated cytidylate of E. coli MccA. The exact position of carboxymethylation in the nucleobase remains to be determined. The modification is functionally important for while it has a marginal effect on target inhibition, it inactivates one of the mechanisms of resistance to McC-like compounds, clearly a beneficial trait for the producing organism.

Nonhydrolyzable aminoacyl-adenylates are potent inhibitors of tRNA aminoacylation reactions that proceed through an obligatory activated aminoacyl-adenylate intermediate. Thus, it was an expected result that the common product of proteolytic processing of various peptide-adenylates related to E. coli microcin C inhibits Asp-RS.7 Processed peptide-cytidylates studied in this work also inhibit Asp-RS. The result is not a consequence of general promiscuity of Asp-RS to the nucleotide moiety of aspartyl-nucleotides, since introduction of uridine or guanosine at the terminus of the MccA peptide had no inhibitory effect either in vivo or in vitro. The specificities of other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases may be different, since a study of chemically synthesized isoleucyl-sulfamoyl nucleoside analogues attributed the highest inhibitory activity toward Ile-RS to uridylated followed by adenylated- and cytidylated compounds.22 While the group of organisms naturally targeted by B. amyloliquefaciens DSM7 producing McCBam is presently unknown, one may hypothesize that the Asp-RS from these bacteria is inhibited more efficiently by aspartyl-cytidylates than by the adenylate.

Several other natural pyrimidine-containing compounds that bind to the catalytic center of aminoacyl tRNA synthetases are known. One is a natural Trojan-horse antibiotic, albomycin δ2, produced by Streptomyces sp. It comprises of the vehicle siderophore part and the inhibitor part, an N4-carbamoyl-3-methylcytosine attached to diseryl-thioxylofuranosyl moiety.23,24 Processed albomycin δ2 inhibits Ser-RS, though its structure is completely different from that of processed McCBam.

Bioinformatics analysis predicts that mcc operons from evolutionary distant bacteria likely produce cytidylated, rather than adenylated RiPPs. Some of these operons also contain additional genes, distinct from functionally characterized mcc genes of E. coli and the B. amyloliquefaciens genes characterized in this work.13 The products of these genes may be carrying out additional decorations that increase the activity of basic peptidyl-nucleotides and/or decrease resistance of targeted bacteria. The reasons why a particular operon evolves to produce a particular kind of peptide–nucleotide and additional decoration sets presents an interesting evolutionary and functional problem that remains to be solved. In the interim, the ability to attach various modified nucleotides to peptides capable of facilitated transport into cells presents an attractive strategy for design of novel antibacterial compounds.

Experimental Section

Bacterial Strains and Media

B. amyloiquefaciens DSM7 was purchased from German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ). All cloning was performed in E. coli DH5a. B. subtilis 168 was used as a heterologous host for B. amyloliquefaciens mcc cluster expression. Protein expression and in vivo McC activity tests were done in E. coli B strain. E. coli BW25113 ΔrimI ΔrimL ΔrimJ11 was used for in vitro Asp-RS inhibition assay. Bacteria were grown on LB medium supplemented with antibiotics as required. M9 minimal medium complemented with 0.1% casamino acids, 0.5% glycerol, and either 0.01% yeast extract (for E. coli) or 5 mg/L of l-tryptophan (for B. subtilis) was used where indicated.

Cloning, Protein Expression, and Purification

Sequences of all primers are listed in Table S1. B. amyloliquefaciens mcc gene cluster including its 5′ intergenic region was amplified with Phusion DNA polymerase and primers Bam_F and Bam_R. PCR product was cloned into pHT01 shuttle vector between KpnI and BamHI to create pHT-mcc. This removes plasmid-borne pGrac promoter and introduces the mcc natural promoter. pHT-mcc plasmid was transformed into B. subtilis 168 by electroporation and clones were selected on LB agar plates with 10 μg/mL chloramphenicol. McCBam production by the heterologous B. subtilis host was tested by MALDI MS of cells grown for 8 h (OD600 = 1) in LB broth supplemented with 10 μg/mL chloramphenicol.

Full length MccBBam from B. amyloliquefaciens and MccBEco from E. coli were expressed as fusion proteins with N-terminal leaderless MalE. For this, the corresponding PCR products were introduced between BamHI and XhoI restriction sites of pET22MBP.13 DNA fragments spanning 1–348 codons and 348–612 codons of B. amyloliquefaciens mccB were cloned into BamHI and XhoI restriction sites of pET22MBP to obtain MBP-fused MccBNTDBam and MccBCTDBam correspondingly. Coding sequences of E. coli cmoA and B. amyloliquefaciens mccS were cloned into pET28 between BamHI and XhoI sites to create N-terminally fused His tag. E. coli aspS and proS were cloned into pBAD-His between NcoI and XhoI sites to create pBAD-AspRS and pBAD-ProRS plasmids.

For protein expression E. coli BL21(DE3) were transformed with the proper plasmids, grown on LB medium supplemented with either kanamycin or ampicillin at 37 °C until OD600 reached 0.6 and induced with 1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside. Cells were allowed to grow for an additional 11–16 h at 20 °C before harvesting. Pelleted cells were washed with loading buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT) and resuspended in the same buffer supplemented with 0.2 mM phenylmethane sulfonyl fluoride and 1 mg/mL lysozyme. After sonication the lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 15 000 rcf for 30 min. At this stage for His-tagged proteins purification imidazole was added up to 10 mM. His-tagged proteins were loaded to HiTrap Chelating HP column (GE Healthcare) precharged with Co2+ and equilibrated with the loading buffer. Proteins were eluted with the 10 to 500 mM linear gradient of imidazole. MBP-fused proteins were purified on MBPTrap HP (GE Healthcare) and eluted with 10 mM maltose in the loading buffer. Purity of proteins was checked on Coomassie-stained SDS gels.

In Vitro Nucleotidyl Transferase Assay

Synthetic peptides MccABam (MLKIRKVKIVRAQNGHYTN) and MccAEco (MRTGNAN) with and without N-terminal formyl group were purchased from GenScript (USA). Reactions contained 100 μM peptide, 2 μM of the corresponding enzyme, and 5 mM of one of the NTPs in 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT. For the nucleotide selection test all four NTPs were added to the reaction at the 2 mM final concentration. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 1 to 16 h at 32 °C depending on the required yield of the peptide–nucleotide. When necessary, reaction was quenched with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), precipitated protein was removed by centrifugation and soluble peptide–nucleotides were purified using Eclipse Plus C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, particle size 5 μm) (Agilent Technologies) at flow rate of 1 mL/min. A 10 min (approximately 2.5 column volumes) linear gradient from 5 to 15% acetonitrile in 0.1% TFA was applied. Elution of substances was monitored by absorption at 260 nm. Fractions corresponding to the peptide–nucleotides were dried in a rotary evaporator and redissolved in water. Published extinction coefficients for nucleotide monophosphates were used to calculate peptidyl nucleotide concentrations.

cxSAM Synthesis

For enzymatic cxSAM production 1 mM SAM and 1 mM prephenate were incubated with either 10 μM CmoA or 10 μM MccSBam in 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT for 2 h at 32 °C. Chemical synthesis of cxSAM was performed as described in Kim et al., 2013.15 In brief, 30 mg of 2-iodoacetic acid was added to 1 mL of the 5 mg/mL suspension of S-Adenosyl-l-homocysteine in 300 mM ammonium bicarbonate and incubated at 37 °C for 20 h with constant agitation. Both enzymatically and chemically synthesized cxSAM was partially purified using RP-HPLC. Analytical chromatography was performed on ProntoSil-120–5-C18 AQ column (particle size 5 μm, 2.0 × 75 mm column dimensions) (Econova, Russia) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min with UV detection at 260 nm. The column was equilibrated with 10 mM Na2HPO4, pH 5.9. cxSAM was eluted in a linear gradient from 0 to 25% acetonitrile in the presence of 10 mM Na2HPO4 in 8 min. Preparative purification was performed using C18 Eclipse Plus (4.6 × 100 mm, 5 μm particle size) (Agilent Technologies) column and eluted using the same buffer system. Neutral pH and low acetonitrile content in the eluted cxSAM samples allowed their direct use in the carboxymethylation reactions.

In Vitro Carboxymethylation

Reaction mixture contained 100 μM purified MccAEco-CMP or MccABam-CMP peptidyl-cytidylates, ∼0.5 mM cxSAM, and 2 μM MccBCTD in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT. Reaction was carried out for 6 h at 32 °C then quenched with 0.1% TFA, and centrifuged to remove protein precipitate. Compounds were purified the same way as peptidyl-nucleotides. Fractions containing carboxymethylated peptide-cytidylates were dried in a rotary evaporator and redissolved in water.

MALDI MS and MS/MS Analysis

1-μL aliquot of in vitro reaction mixture or ∼0.2 μL of cells were diluted in 10 μL of 0.5% TFA. One μL of the diluted sample was mixed with 0.5 μL of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid solution (20 mg/mL in 30% acetonitrile, 0.5% TFA) and left to dry on the stainless steel target plate at room temperature. MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed on UltrafleXetreme MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik, Germany) equipped with Nd laser. The MH+ molecular ions were measured in reflector mode; the accuracy of monoisotopic mass peak measurement was within 30 ppm. Spectra were acquired by averaging of a minimum 1000 laser shots from “sweet spots” of matrix crystals. Spectra of fragmentation were obtained in LIFT mode, the accuracy of daughter ions measurement was within 1 Da range. Mass-spectra were processed with the use of FlexAnalysis 3.2 software (Bruker Daltonik, Germany) and analyzed manually.

In Vivo Sensitivity Test

Wild type E. coli B strain and its isogenic deletion mutants ΔyejB and ΔsbmA transformed with vector plasmid pBAD-His were used as tester strains. For protein target and immunity mechanism verification tests, E. coli B strain transformed with expression plasmids pBAD-AspRS, pBAD-ProRS, pBAD-MccF, and pBAD-MccE were used. Cells were grown in LB medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 10 mM arabinose. The overnight culture was diluted 1000-fold with soft agar containing M9 medium supplemented with 1% glycerol, 0.01% yeast extract, 10 mM arabinose and 100 μg/mL ampicillin. 5-μL drops of 20 μM peptide–nucleotides solutions were deposited on the surface of the solidified agar and allowed to dry. Kanamycin (1 mg/mL) was used as a control growth inhibitor. Plates were incubated for 16 h at 30 °C to form a lawn.

tRNA Aminoacylation

E. coli BW25113 ΔrimI ΔrimJ ΔrimL were grown in 50 mL of LB medium at 37 °C until OD600 reached 0.8. Cells were collected by centrifugation, washed with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, resuspended in 1 mL of the same buffer supplemented with 1 mM DTT, and disrupted by sonication. The S30 cell lysate was prepared as described earlier.11 To process the peptide part, 25 μM peptidyl-nucleotides were preincubated with S30 cell lysate (3 mg/mL final protein concentration) for 2 h at 25 °C. Sixteen μL of the aminoacylation mixture (30 mM Tris-HCl, pH8.0, 30 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 3 mM ATP, 5 mg/mL bulk E. coli tRNA, 23 μM 14C-Asp) were combined with 4 μL of processed peptidyl-nucleotide samples and incubated for 5 min at 25 °C. The reaction mixture was dried on Whatman 3MM paper filters. After washing with ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid, filters were washed with acetone and dried. The incorporation of radioactivity into insoluble fraction was determined in a scintillation counter.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Vera Doroshenko and Prof. Sergei Borukhov from Rowan University for their invaluable help. This work was supported by Russian Foundation of Basic Research grant RFBR 15-04-05672 to SD and an NIH grant R01 AI117210 (NIAID) to Satish A. Nair and KS. In vivo and in vitro testing as well as synthesis of chimeric microcins was supported by Russian Science Foundation RSF 16-14-10356 to SD. MALDI MS facility became available to us in the framework of the Moscow State University Development Program PNG 5.13. Chemical work was supported by a grant from the FWO (G.0778.14N; Flemish Government) and from the Research Fund KU Leuven (OT/14/105).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b09853.

  • Figures S1–S3 and Table S1 (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ja6b09853_si_001.pdf (524.3KB, pdf)

References

  1. Arnison P. G.; Bibb M. J.; Bierbaum G.; Bowers A. A.; Bugni T. S.; Bulaj G.; Camarero J. A.; Campopiano D. J.; Challis G. L.; Clardy J.; Cotter P. D.; Craik D. J.; Dawson M.; Dittmann E.; Donadio S.; Dorrestein P. C.; Entian K. D.; Fischbach M. A.; Garavelli J. S.; Göransson U.; Gruber C. W.; Haft D. H.; Hemscheidt T. K.; Hertweck C.; Hill C.; Horswill A. R.; Jaspars M.; Kelly W. L.; Klinman J. P.; Kuipers O. P.; Link A. J.; Liu W.; Marahiel M. A.; Mitchell D. A.; Moll G. N.; Moore B. S.; Müller R.; Nair S. K.; Nes I. F.; Norris G. E.; Olivera B. M.; Onaka H.; Patchett M. L.; Piel J.; Reaney M. J.; Rebuffat S.; Ross R. P.; Sahl H. G.; Schmidt E. W.; Selsted M. E.; Severinov K.; Shen B.; Sivonen K.; Smith L.; Stein T.; Süssmuth R. D.; Tagg J. R.; Tang G. L.; Truman A. W.; Vederas J. C.; Walsh C. T.; Walton J. D.; Wenzel S. C.; Willey J. M.; van der Donk W. A. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013, 30, 108–160. 10.1039/C2NP20085F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Guijarro J. I.; González-Pastor J. E.; Baleux F.; San Millán J. L.; Castilla M. A.; Rico M.; Moreno F.; Delepierre M. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 23520–23532. 10.1074/jbc.270.40.23520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Roush R. F.; Nolan E. M.; Löhr F.; Walsh C. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3603–3609. 10.1021/ja7101949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kulikovsky A.; Serebryakova M.; Bantysh O.; Metlitskaya A.; Borukhov S.; Severinov K.; Dubiley S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11168–11175. 10.1021/ja505982c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Metlitskaya A.; Kazakov T.; Vondenhoff G. H.; Novikova M.; Shashkov A.; Zatsepin T.; Semenova E.; Zaitseva N.; Ramensky V.; Van Aerschot A.; Severinov K. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 2380–2387. 10.1128/JB.00999-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Novikova M.; Metlitskaya A.; Datsenko K.; Kazakov T.; Kazakov A.; Wanner B.; Severinov K. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 8361–8365. 10.1128/JB.01028-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Metlitskaya A.; Kazakov T.; Kommer A.; Pavlova O.; Praetorius-Ibba M.; Ibba M.; Krasheninnikov I.; Kolb V.; Khmel I.; Severinov K. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 18033–18042. 10.1074/jbc.M513174200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Novikova M.; Kazakov T.; Vondenhoff G. H.; Semenova E.; Rozenski J.; Metlytskaya A.; Zukher I.; Tikhonov A.; Van Aerschot A.; Severinov K. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 12662–12669. 10.1074/jbc.M109.080192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tikhonov A.; Kazakov T.; Semenova E.; Serebryakova M.; Vondenhoff G.; Van Aerschot A.; Reader J. S.; Govorun V. M.; Severinov K. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 37944–37952. 10.1074/jbc.M110.179135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nocek B.; Tikhonov A.; Babnigg G.; Gu M.; Zhou M.; Makarova K. S.; Vondenhoff G.; Van Aerschot A.; Kwon K.; Anderson W. F.; Severinov K.; Joachimiak A. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 420, 366–383. 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kazakov T.; Kuznedelov K.; Semenova E.; Mukhamedyarov D.; Datsenko K. A.; Metlitskaya A.; Vondenhoff G. H.; Tikhonov A.; Agarwal V.; Nair S.; Van Aerschot A.; Severinov K. J. Bacteriol. 2014, 196, 3377–3385. 10.1128/JB.01584-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Severinov K.; Semenova E.; Kazakov A.; Kazakov T.; Gelfand M. S. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 65, 1380–1394. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bantysh O.; Serebryakova M.; Makarova K. S.; Dubiley S.; Datsenko K. A.; Severinov K. mBio 2014, 5, e01059–14. 10.1128/mBio.01059-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zukher I.; Novikova M.; Tikhonov A.; Nesterchuk M. V.; Osterman I. A.; Djordjevic M.; Sergiev P. V.; Sharma C. M.; Severinov K. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 11891–11902. 10.1093/nar/gku880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim J.; Xiao H.; Bonanno J. B.; Kalyanaraman C.; Brown S.; Tang X.; Al-Obaidi N. F.; Patskovsky Y.; Babbitt P. C.; Jacobson M. P.; Lee Y. S.; Almo S. C. Nature 2013, 498, 123–126. 10.1038/nature12180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Byrne R. T.; Whelan F.; Aller P.; Bird L. E.; Dowle A.; Lobley C. M.; Reddivari Y.; Nettleship J. E.; Owens R. J.; Antson A. A.; Waterman D. G. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 2013, 69, 1090–1098. 10.1107/S0907444913004939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim J.; Xiao H.; Koh J.; Wang Y.; Bonanno J. B.; Thomas K.; Babbitt P. C.; Brown S.; Lee Y. S.; Almo S. C. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 4602–4613. 10.1093/nar/gkv206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gundlach H. G.; Moore S.; Stein W. H. J. Biol. Chem. 1959, 234, 1761–1764. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kazakov T.; Vondenhoff G. H.; Datsenko K. A.; Novikova M.; Metlitskaya A.; Wanner B. L.; Severinov K. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 2607–2610. 10.1128/JB.01956-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Niu G.; Tan H. Trends Microbiol. 2015, 23, 110–119. 10.1016/j.tim.2014.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Regni C. A.; Roush R. F.; Miller D. J.; Nourse A.; Walsh C. T.; Schulman B. A. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 1953–1964. 10.1038/emboj.2009.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gadakh B.; Vondenhoff G.; Lescrinier E.; Rozenski J.; Froeyen M.; Van Aerschot A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 2875–2886. 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zeng Y.; Kulkarni A.; Yang Z.; Patil P. B.; Zhou W.; Chi X.; Van Lanen S.; Chen S. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7, 1565–1575. 10.1021/cb300173x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stefanska A. L.; Fulston M.; Houge-Frydrych C. S.; Jones J. J.; Warr S. R. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 1346–1353. 10.7164/antibiotics.53.1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja6b09853_si_001.pdf (524.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES