Skip to main content
The Oncologist logoLink to The Oncologist
. 2016 Oct 14;21(12):1414–e9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0026

Phase II Trial of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Black Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Che-Kai Tsao a,, John Sfakianos b, Bobby Liaw a, Kiev Gimpel-Tetra a, Margaret Kemeny c, Linda Bulone c, Mohammad Shahin a, William Kyu Oh a, Matthew David Galsky a
PMCID: PMC5153336  PMID: 27742908

Abstract

Lessons Learned

  • The safety and activity findings of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment in black men with mCRPC were similar to results from previously conducted studies with largely white populations.

  • Poor trial accrual continues to be a challenge in black men with mCRPC and further efforts are needed to address such underrepresentation.

Background.

Self-identified black men have higher incidence and mortality from prostate cancer in the United States compared with white men but are dramatically underrepresented in clinical trials exploring novel therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Methods.

Black men with mCRPC were treated with abiraterone acetate (AA), 1,000 mg daily, and prednisone (P), 5 mg twice daily. The primary objective was to determine antitumor activity (defined by a ≥30% decline in prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level) and to correlate germline polymorphisms in androgen metabolism genes with antitumor activity. Secondary objectives included determining safety, post-treatment changes in measurable disease, and time to disease progression.

Results.

From April 2013 to March 2016, a total of 11 black men were enrolled and received AA plus P (AA+P); 7 of 10 evaluable patients were docetaxel naive. Post-treatment declines in PSA level of ≥30% were achieved in 90% of patients. The side effect profile was consistent with prior clinical trials exploring AA+P in mCRPC. Due to poor accrual, the study was closed prematurely with insufficient sample size for the planned pharmacogenetic analyses.

Conclusion.

In this small prospective study terminated for poor accrual, the safety and activity of AA+P in black men with mCRPC was similar to that reported in prior studies exploring AA in largely white populations. Further efforts are needed to address underrepresentation of black men in mCRPC trials.

Discussion

AA is a steroidal inhibitor of 17α hydroxylase/C17,20-lyase (CYP17), which, in combination with prednisone, is approved for the treatment of mCRPC, based on the results of two randomized phase III trials demonstrating improvements in survival [1, 2]; but black men were largely underrepresented in both. Although poor access to health care is related to inferior outcomes in black men with prostate cancer, at least in part, differences in disease biology may also impact treatment response and survival. Indeed, germline polymorphisms in androgen metabolism genes (AMGs) have been correlated with response to androgen deprivation therapy [3, 4], and several AMG polymorphisms have been demonstrated to be more common in black patients, including polymorphisms in CYP17 [5].

This investigation was designed as a pilot study with a primary objective of determining whether there is a correlation between inherited genetic polymorphisms and antitumor activity (as defined by a decline in PSA level of ≥30%) in black patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate. Specifically, germline polymorphisms (as determined from baseline peripheral blood samples) in CYP17 and other genes involved in androgen metabolism were to be evaluated. Because this was the first prospective study, to our knowledge, to explore the relationship of germline polymorphisms in androgen pathway genes with response to hormonal therapy in a prospective cohort of black patients with CRPC, the study was designed to be exploratory, hypothesis generating, and to inform the design of larger, more definitive studies.

The primary endpoint of the study was to correlate germline polymorphisms in AMGs to a post-treatment decline in PSA level of ≥30%. Unfortunately, the study was prematurely terminated due to poor accrual, precluding the planned pharmacogenetic analyses. Of 10 evaluable patients treated, 9 had a ≥30% decline in PSA level. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with no subjects discontinuing treatment because of adverse effects. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with no subjects discontinuing treatment because of adverse effects, although incidence of some common adverse effects may have been higher than expected due to small sample size (e.g., fatigue).

To our knowledge, this is the first prospective interventional study exploring a treatment for mCRPC specifically enrolling black men; the study highlights several important lessons. Poor enrollment of black men in prostate cancer clinical trials is likely multifactorial: Black men are more often deemed ineligible for cancer clinical trials and are more likely to refuse participation when eligible [6, 7]. Despite opening our study at two centers with catchment areas made up of a large black population, these factors likely contributed to the poor accrual. Although it did not impact our study, increased use of multinational sites with very small black populations in phase III trials has further exacerbated disparities. Potential solutions include large multicenter postmarketing registries, patient navigation and community education, and dedicated clinical trials enrolling black patients [6, 8]. Although funding for multicenter investigator-initiated studies is often prohibitive, the National Cancer Institute cooperative group system may be an appropriate venue for such studies.

Trial Information

Disease

Prostate cancer

Stage of disease/treatment

Metastatic/advanced

Prior therapy

No designated number of regimens

Type of study - 1

Phase II

Type of study - 2

Single Arm

Primary Endpoint

Overall response rate

Secondary Endpoint

Efficacy

Secondary Endpoint

Correlative endpoint

Secondary Endpoint

Safety

Additional Details of Endpoints or Study Design

The primary objective of this study was to determine a correlation between inherited genetic polymorphisms and antitumor activity (as defined by a decline in PSA of ≥30%) in black patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate. Specifically, germline polymorphisms (as determined from baseline peripheral blood samples) in CYP17 and other genes involved in androgen metabolism will be evaluated—a total of approximately 120 polymorphisms tagging all known, common variations across 20 genes of interest.

Unfortunately, the study was prematurely terminated due to poor accrual, precluding the planned pharmacogenetic analyses. Of 10 evaluable patients treated, 9 had a ≥30% PSA decline.

Investigator's Analysis

Active but results overtaken by other developments

Drug Information

Drug 1
Generic/Working name

Abiraterone acetate

Trade name

Zytiga

Company name

Janssen Biotech

Drug type

Biological

Drug class

Androgen receptor

Dose

1,000 mg per flat dose

Route

Oral

Schedule of Administration

Take 1,000 mg every morning on an empty stomach

Drug 2
Generic/Working name

Prednisone

Drug class

Corticosteroid

Dose

5 mg, twice daily, per flat dose

Route

Oral

Patient Characteristics

Number of patients, male

11

Number of patients, female

0

Stage

Stage IV, castration-resistant prostate cancer

Age

Median (range): 66 (54–78)

Number of prior systemic therapies

Median (range): 3 (1–4)

Performance Status: ECOG

0 — 8

1 — 3

2 —

3 —

Unknown —

Cancer Types or Histologic Subtypes

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate 11

Primary Assessment Method

Control Arm: Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate
Number of patients screened

11

Number of patients enrolled

11

Number of patients evaluable for toxicity

10

Number of patients evaluated for efficacy

10

Response assessment PR

n = 9 (90)

Response assessment SD

n = 1 (10)

Control Arm: Total Patient Population
Number of patients screened

11

Number of patients enrolled

11

Number of patients evaluable for toxicity

10

Number of patients evaluated for efficacy

10

Response assessment PR

n = 9 (90)

Response assessment SD

n = 1 (10)

Adverse Events

graphic file with name theoncologist_16026CTR_t1.jpg

Assessment, Analysis, and Discussion

Completion

Study terminated before completion

Terminated reason

Did not fully accrue

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics

Not collected

Investigator's Assessment

Endpoint not met because study closed early due to poor accrual.

Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a steroidal inhibitor of 17α hydroxylase/C17,20-lyase (CYP17), which, in combination with prednisone, is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), based on the results of 2 randomized phase III trials demonstrating improvements in survival [1, 2]; but black men were largely underrepresented in both. Although poor access to health care is related to inferior outcomes in black men with prostate cancer, at least in part, differences in disease biology may also impact treatment response and survival. Indeed, germline polymorphisms in androgen metabolism genes (AMGs) have been correlated with response to androgen deprivation therapy [3, 4], and several AMG polymorphisms have been demonstrated to be more common in black patients, including polymorphisms in CYP17 [5].

This investigation was designed as a pilot study with a primary objective of determining whether there is a correlation between inherited genetic polymorphisms and antitumor activity (as defined by a ≥30% decline in prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level) in black patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate. Specifically, germline polymorphisms (as determined from baseline peripheral blood samples) in CYP17 and other genes involved in androgen metabolism were to be evaluated. Because this was the first prospective study, to our knowledge, to explore the relationship of germline polymorphisms in androgen pathway genes with response to hormonal therapy in a prospective cohort of black patients with CRPC, the study was designed to be exploratory, hypothesis generating, and to inform the design of larger more definitive studies.

The primary endpoint of the study was to correlate germline polymorphisms in AMGs to a post-treatment decline in PSA level of ≥30%. Unfortunately, the study was prematurely terminated due to poor accrual, precluding the planned pharmacogenetic analyses. Of 10 evaluable patients treated, 9 had a ≥30% decline in PSA level (Fig. 1). Treatment was generally well tolerated, with no subjects discontinuing treatment because of adverse effects, although incidence of some common adverse effects may have been higher than expected due to small sample size (e.g., fatigue).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Waterfall plot of maximum post-treatment declines in prostate-specific antigen levels.

To our knowledge, this was the first prospective interventional study exploring a treatment for mCRPC specifically enrolling black men and it highlights several important lessons. Poor enrollment of black men in prostate cancer clinical trials is likely multifactorial: Black men are more often deemed ineligible for cancer clinical trials and are more likely to refuse participation when eligible [6, 7]. Despite opening our study at two centers with catchment areas made up of a large black population, these factors likely contributed to the poor accrual. Although it did not impact our study, increased use of multinational sites with very small black populations in phase III trials has further exacerbated disparities. Potential solutions include large multicenter postmarketing registries, patient navigation and community education, and dedicated clinical trials enrolling black patients [6, 8]. Although funding for multicenter investigator-initiated studies is often prohibitive, the National Cancer Institute cooperative group system may be an appropriate venue for such studies.

Footnotes

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01735396

Sponsor: Janssen Biotech

Principal Investigator: Matthew David Galsky

IRB Approved: Yes

Click here to access other published clinical trials.

EDITOR'S NOTE: See the related commentary, “The Elimination of Cancer Health Disparities: Are We Ready to Do the Heavy Lifting?,” by Jonathan D. Jackson, Beverly Moy, and Michele K. Evans, on page 1411 of this issue.

Disclosures

Che-Kai Tsao: Dendreon (C/A, RF); Bobby Liaw: Bayer (C/A); William Kyu Oh: Janssen (C/A); Matthew David Galsky: Genentech, AstraZeneca, Astellas (C/A), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Dendreon (RF), Dual Therapeutics (OI). The other authors indicated no financial relationships.

(C/A) Consulting/advisory relationship; (RF) Research funding; (E) Employment; (ET) Expert testimony; (H) Honoraria received; (OI) Ownership interests; (IP) Intellectual property rights/inventor/patent holder; (SAB) Scientific advisory board

References

  • 1.de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1995–2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ryan CJ, Smith MR, de Bono JS, et al. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:138–148. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ross RW, Oh WK, Xie W, et al. Inherited variation in the androgen pathway is associated with the efficacy of androgen-deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:842–847. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yang M, Xie W, Mostaghel E, et al. SLCO2B1 and SLCO1B3 may determine time to progression for patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2565–2573. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sarma AV, Dunn RL, Lange LA, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in CYP17, CYP3A4, CYP19A1, SRD5A2, IGF-1, and IGFBP-3 and prostate cancer risk in African-American men: The Flint Men’s Health Study. Prostate. 2008;68:296–305. doi: 10.1002/pros.20696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rivers D, August EM, Sehovic I, et al. A systematic review of the factors influencing African Americans’ participation in cancer clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;35:13–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Adams-Campbell LL, Ahaghotu C, Gaskins M, et al. Enrollment of African Americans onto clinical treatment trials: Study design barriers. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:730–734. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Spratt DE, Osborne JR. Disparities in castration-resistant prostate cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1101–1103. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.1751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Oncologist are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES