Abstract
Lessons Learned
The safety and activity findings of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment in black men with mCRPC were similar to results from previously conducted studies with largely white populations.
Poor trial accrual continues to be a challenge in black men with mCRPC and further efforts are needed to address such underrepresentation.
Background.
Self-identified black men have higher incidence and mortality from prostate cancer in the United States compared with white men but are dramatically underrepresented in clinical trials exploring novel therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Methods.
Black men with mCRPC were treated with abiraterone acetate (AA), 1,000 mg daily, and prednisone (P), 5 mg twice daily. The primary objective was to determine antitumor activity (defined by a ≥30% decline in prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level) and to correlate germline polymorphisms in androgen metabolism genes with antitumor activity. Secondary objectives included determining safety, post-treatment changes in measurable disease, and time to disease progression.
Results.
From April 2013 to March 2016, a total of 11 black men were enrolled and received AA plus P (AA+P); 7 of 10 evaluable patients were docetaxel naive. Post-treatment declines in PSA level of ≥30% were achieved in 90% of patients. The side effect profile was consistent with prior clinical trials exploring AA+P in mCRPC. Due to poor accrual, the study was closed prematurely with insufficient sample size for the planned pharmacogenetic analyses.
Conclusion.
In this small prospective study terminated for poor accrual, the safety and activity of AA+P in black men with mCRPC was similar to that reported in prior studies exploring AA in largely white populations. Further efforts are needed to address underrepresentation of black men in mCRPC trials.
Abstract
作者总结
经验
• 醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌 (mCRPC) 黑人男性患者的安全性和有效性与既往主要在白人群体中开展的研究结果相似。
• mCRPC 临床试验中黑人男性患者入组不理想仍然是该人群研究的一大难题, 有必要进一步努力解决这一人群代表性不足的问题。
摘要
背景. 美国黑人男性前列腺癌的发病率和死亡率均高于白人男性, 但在转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌 (mCRPC) 新治疗研发的临床试验中, 黑人男性的代表性却明显不足。
方法. 患有mCRPC的黑人男性接受醋酸阿比特龙 (AA) 1 000 mg每日1次和泼尼松 (P) 5 mg每日2次治疗。主要目的为确定该治疗方案的抗肿瘤活性[定义为前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 水平下降≥30%], 以及雄激素代谢基因生殖系多态性与抗肿瘤活性之间的相关性。次要目的包括确定安全性、可测量病灶在治疗后的改变, 以及至疾病进展时间。
结果. 从2013年4月至2016年3月, 研究共入组11例黑人男性接受AA+P治疗, 7/10例可评价患者未接受过多西他赛治疗。90%的患者治疗后PSA水平下降≥30%。副作用特征与既往研究AA+P治疗mCRPC的临床试验情况一致。研究因招募入组极不理想而提前关闭, 计划的药物遗传学分析样本量不足。
结论. 本项小型前瞻性研究因招募入组过慢而终止, AA+P在mCRPC黑人男性患者中的安全性和有效性与既往主要在白人男性中开展的AA研究相似。有必要进一步努力解决黑人男性在mCRPC临床试验中代表性不足的问题。The Oncologist 2016;21:1414–1415
Discussion
AA is a steroidal inhibitor of 17α hydroxylase/C17,20-lyase (CYP17), which, in combination with prednisone, is approved for the treatment of mCRPC, based on the results of two randomized phase III trials demonstrating improvements in survival [1, 2]; but black men were largely underrepresented in both. Although poor access to health care is related to inferior outcomes in black men with prostate cancer, at least in part, differences in disease biology may also impact treatment response and survival. Indeed, germline polymorphisms in androgen metabolism genes (AMGs) have been correlated with response to androgen deprivation therapy [3, 4], and several AMG polymorphisms have been demonstrated to be more common in black patients, including polymorphisms in CYP17 [5].
This investigation was designed as a pilot study with a primary objective of determining whether there is a correlation between inherited genetic polymorphisms and antitumor activity (as defined by a decline in PSA level of ≥30%) in black patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate. Specifically, germline polymorphisms (as determined from baseline peripheral blood samples) in CYP17 and other genes involved in androgen metabolism were to be evaluated. Because this was the first prospective study, to our knowledge, to explore the relationship of germline polymorphisms in androgen pathway genes with response to hormonal therapy in a prospective cohort of black patients with CRPC, the study was designed to be exploratory, hypothesis generating, and to inform the design of larger, more definitive studies.
The primary endpoint of the study was to correlate germline polymorphisms in AMGs to a post-treatment decline in PSA level of ≥30%. Unfortunately, the study was prematurely terminated due to poor accrual, precluding the planned pharmacogenetic analyses. Of 10 evaluable patients treated, 9 had a ≥30% decline in PSA level. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with no subjects discontinuing treatment because of adverse effects. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with no subjects discontinuing treatment because of adverse effects, although incidence of some common adverse effects may have been higher than expected due to small sample size (e.g., fatigue).
To our knowledge, this is the first prospective interventional study exploring a treatment for mCRPC specifically enrolling black men; the study highlights several important lessons. Poor enrollment of black men in prostate cancer clinical trials is likely multifactorial: Black men are more often deemed ineligible for cancer clinical trials and are more likely to refuse participation when eligible [6, 7]. Despite opening our study at two centers with catchment areas made up of a large black population, these factors likely contributed to the poor accrual. Although it did not impact our study, increased use of multinational sites with very small black populations in phase III trials has further exacerbated disparities. Potential solutions include large multicenter postmarketing registries, patient navigation and community education, and dedicated clinical trials enrolling black patients [6, 8]. Although funding for multicenter investigator-initiated studies is often prohibitive, the National Cancer Institute cooperative group system may be an appropriate venue for such studies.
Trial Information
- Disease
Prostate cancer
- Stage of disease/treatment
Metastatic/advanced
- Prior therapy
No designated number of regimens
- Type of study - 1
Phase II
- Type of study - 2
Single Arm
- Primary Endpoint
Overall response rate
- Secondary Endpoint
Efficacy
- Secondary Endpoint
Correlative endpoint
- Secondary Endpoint
Safety
- Additional Details of Endpoints or Study Design
-
The primary objective of this study was to determine a correlation between inherited genetic polymorphisms and antitumor activity (as defined by a decline in PSA of ≥30%) in black patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate. Specifically, germline polymorphisms (as determined from baseline peripheral blood samples) in CYP17 and other genes involved in androgen metabolism will be evaluated—a total of approximately 120 polymorphisms tagging all known, common variations across 20 genes of interest.
Unfortunately, the study was prematurely terminated due to poor accrual, precluding the planned pharmacogenetic analyses. Of 10 evaluable patients treated, 9 had a ≥30% PSA decline.
- Investigator's Analysis
Active but results overtaken by other developments
Drug Information
- Drug 1
- Generic/Working name
Abiraterone acetate
- Trade name
Zytiga
- Company name
Janssen Biotech
- Drug type
Biological
- Drug class
Androgen receptor
- Dose
1,000 mg per flat dose
- Route
Oral
- Schedule of Administration
Take 1,000 mg every morning on an empty stomach
- Drug 2
- Generic/Working name
Prednisone
- Drug class
Corticosteroid
- Dose
5 mg, twice daily, per flat dose
- Route
Oral
Patient Characteristics
- Number of patients, male
11
- Number of patients, female
0
- Stage
Stage IV, castration-resistant prostate cancer
- Age
Median (range): 66 (54–78)
- Number of prior systemic therapies
Median (range): 3 (1–4)
- Performance Status: ECOG
-
0 — 8
1 — 3
2 —
3 —
Unknown —
- Cancer Types or Histologic Subtypes
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate 11
Primary Assessment Method
- Control Arm: Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate
- Number of patients screened
11
- Number of patients enrolled
11
- Number of patients evaluable for toxicity
10
- Number of patients evaluated for efficacy
10
- Response assessment PR
n = 9 (90)
- Response assessment SD
n = 1 (10)
- Control Arm: Total Patient Population
- Number of patients screened
11
- Number of patients enrolled
11
- Number of patients evaluable for toxicity
10
- Number of patients evaluated for efficacy
10
- Response assessment PR
n = 9 (90)
- Response assessment SD
n = 1 (10)
Adverse Events
Assessment, Analysis, and Discussion
- Completion
Study terminated before completion
- Terminated reason
Did not fully accrue
- Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics
Not collected
- Investigator's Assessment
Endpoint not met because study closed early due to poor accrual.
Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a steroidal inhibitor of 17α hydroxylase/C17,20-lyase (CYP17), which, in combination with prednisone, is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), based on the results of 2 randomized phase III trials demonstrating improvements in survival [1, 2]; but black men were largely underrepresented in both. Although poor access to health care is related to inferior outcomes in black men with prostate cancer, at least in part, differences in disease biology may also impact treatment response and survival. Indeed, germline polymorphisms in androgen metabolism genes (AMGs) have been correlated with response to androgen deprivation therapy [3, 4], and several AMG polymorphisms have been demonstrated to be more common in black patients, including polymorphisms in CYP17 [5].
This investigation was designed as a pilot study with a primary objective of determining whether there is a correlation between inherited genetic polymorphisms and antitumor activity (as defined by a ≥30% decline in prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level) in black patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate. Specifically, germline polymorphisms (as determined from baseline peripheral blood samples) in CYP17 and other genes involved in androgen metabolism were to be evaluated. Because this was the first prospective study, to our knowledge, to explore the relationship of germline polymorphisms in androgen pathway genes with response to hormonal therapy in a prospective cohort of black patients with CRPC, the study was designed to be exploratory, hypothesis generating, and to inform the design of larger more definitive studies.
The primary endpoint of the study was to correlate germline polymorphisms in AMGs to a post-treatment decline in PSA level of ≥30%. Unfortunately, the study was prematurely terminated due to poor accrual, precluding the planned pharmacogenetic analyses. Of 10 evaluable patients treated, 9 had a ≥30% decline in PSA level (Fig. 1). Treatment was generally well tolerated, with no subjects discontinuing treatment because of adverse effects, although incidence of some common adverse effects may have been higher than expected due to small sample size (e.g., fatigue).
Figure 1.
Waterfall plot of maximum post-treatment declines in prostate-specific antigen levels.
To our knowledge, this was the first prospective interventional study exploring a treatment for mCRPC specifically enrolling black men and it highlights several important lessons. Poor enrollment of black men in prostate cancer clinical trials is likely multifactorial: Black men are more often deemed ineligible for cancer clinical trials and are more likely to refuse participation when eligible [6, 7]. Despite opening our study at two centers with catchment areas made up of a large black population, these factors likely contributed to the poor accrual. Although it did not impact our study, increased use of multinational sites with very small black populations in phase III trials has further exacerbated disparities. Potential solutions include large multicenter postmarketing registries, patient navigation and community education, and dedicated clinical trials enrolling black patients [6, 8]. Although funding for multicenter investigator-initiated studies is often prohibitive, the National Cancer Institute cooperative group system may be an appropriate venue for such studies.
Footnotes
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01735396
Sponsor: Janssen Biotech
Principal Investigator: Matthew David Galsky
IRB Approved: Yes
Click here to access other published clinical trials.
EDITOR'S NOTE: See the related commentary, “The Elimination of Cancer Health Disparities: Are We Ready to Do the Heavy Lifting?,” by Jonathan D. Jackson, Beverly Moy, and Michele K. Evans, on page 1411 of this issue.
Disclosures
Che-Kai Tsao: Dendreon (C/A, RF); Bobby Liaw: Bayer (C/A); William Kyu Oh: Janssen (C/A); Matthew David Galsky: Genentech, AstraZeneca, Astellas (C/A), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Dendreon (RF), Dual Therapeutics (OI). The other authors indicated no financial relationships.
(C/A) Consulting/advisory relationship; (RF) Research funding; (E) Employment; (ET) Expert testimony; (H) Honoraria received; (OI) Ownership interests; (IP) Intellectual property rights/inventor/patent holder; (SAB) Scientific advisory board
References
- 1.de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1995–2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ryan CJ, Smith MR, de Bono JS, et al. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:138–148. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ross RW, Oh WK, Xie W, et al. Inherited variation in the androgen pathway is associated with the efficacy of androgen-deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:842–847. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang M, Xie W, Mostaghel E, et al. SLCO2B1 and SLCO1B3 may determine time to progression for patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2565–2573. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sarma AV, Dunn RL, Lange LA, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in CYP17, CYP3A4, CYP19A1, SRD5A2, IGF-1, and IGFBP-3 and prostate cancer risk in African-American men: The Flint Men’s Health Study. Prostate. 2008;68:296–305. doi: 10.1002/pros.20696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rivers D, August EM, Sehovic I, et al. A systematic review of the factors influencing African Americans’ participation in cancer clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;35:13–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Adams-Campbell LL, Ahaghotu C, Gaskins M, et al. Enrollment of African Americans onto clinical treatment trials: Study design barriers. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:730–734. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Spratt DE, Osborne JR. Disparities in castration-resistant prostate cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1101–1103. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.1751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]