Scientific Reports 6: Article number: 32403; 10.1038/srep32403 published online: September 13 2016; updated: December 13 2016
This Article contains typographical errors. In the Results section under subheading ‘T. absoluta development’,
“The average pupal weight of the individual feeding on plants treated with OW, OW S+, LW and LW S+ was 3.91 g, 3.58 g, 3.15 g and 3.27 g, respectively”.
should read:
“The average pupal weight of the individual feeding on plants treated with OW, OW S+, LW and LW S+ was 3.91 mg, 3.58 mg, 3.15 mg and 3.27 mg, respectively”.
In Figure 4, the y-axis ‘Pupal weight (mg)’ is incorrectly given as ‘Pupal weight (g)’. The correct Figure 4 appears below as Figure 1.
Figure 1.
