Abstract
Prion diseases are fatal, progressive, neurodegenerative diseases caused by prion accumulation in the brain and lymphoreticular system. Here we report that a single subcutaneous injection of cellulose ethers (CEs), which are commonly used as inactive ingredients in foods and pharmaceuticals, markedly prolonged the lives of mice and hamsters intracerebrally or intraperitoneally infected with the 263K hamster prion. CEs provided sustained protection even when a single injection was given as long as one year before infection. These effects were linked with persistent residues of CEs in various tissues. More effective CEs had less macrophage uptake ratios and hydrophobic modification of CEs abolished the effectiveness. CEs were significantly effective in other prion disease animal models; however, the effects were less remarkable than those observed in the 263K prion-infected animals. The genetic background of the animal model was suggested to influence the effects of CEs. CEs did not modify prion protein expression but inhibited abnormal prion protein formation in vitro and in prion-infected cells. Although the mechanism of CEs in vivo remains to be solved, these findings suggest that they aid in elucidating disease susceptibility and preventing prion diseases.
Author Summary
Prion diseases are progressive, fatal, neurodegenerative transmissible illnesses in humans and animals caused by prion accumulation in the brain and lymphoreticular system. Because they are prevalent in nature, with atypical forms continuing to emerge, prion diseases are potential threats to both public health and the economy. However, there are no effective methods to prevent these diseases. Here we report that cellulose ethers (CEs), which are non-digestible water-soluble polysaccharides that are commonly used as inactive ingredients in foods and pharmaceuticals, show prophylactic efficacy in prion-infected animals. CEs persist in various tissues and confer sustained preventive efficacy for years, suggesting that they help to prevent prion diseases. Although the enteral absorption of CEs is limited, we found that a portion of the absorbed CEs influences disease progression. Therefore, CEs may be useful to assess disease susceptibility and prevent disease occurrence.
Introduction
Prion diseases or transmissible spongiform encephalopathies are fatal neurodegenerative conditions caused by prion accumulation in the brain and lymphoreticular system [1]. Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease is the most common human prion disease that sporadically occurs mostly in the elderly. The number of cases of human prion disease is very small at a few cases per million persons, but the prevalence has been gradually increasing in accordance with the aging of society [2]. Despite recent tremendous therapeutic developments [3–6], remedies or preventive measures to inhibit disease progression or achieve significantly beneficial improvements have not yet been established.
In animal prion diseases such as scrapie in sheep and bovine spongiform encephalopathy in cattle, not only classical but also atypical, cases are known to sporadically occur [7]. In addition, cervine prion diseases such as chronic wasting disease are prevalent in domesticated as well as wild animals [8]. These animal prion diseases have become potential threats to public health and the economy. In particular, the issue of chronic wasting disease in wild animals is serious because affected animals or prion-carriers are difficult to eliminate, prions of chronic wasting disease are shed into excreta, and prions resist decomposition in soil and cadavers [8]. No means for preventing these animal diseases have been established, and development of prophylactic measures such as vaccines has long been awaited. However, prions are not efficiently eliminated by the immune system, which has stalled efforts to develop safe effective vaccines [9–11].
In our early study on the development of a certain anti-prion compound, we noticed that not only anti-prion compound-containing tablets but also placebo tablets prolonged the lifespan of peripherally prion-infected animals. Subsequent analysis of the tablet ingredients revealed that cellulose ethers (CEs) modified disease progression of the prion-infected animals. Here we report the anti-prion prophylactic efficacy of CEs, which have remarkable post- and pre-infection protective effects of a single injection into prion-infected animals. These compounds are non-digestible, non-ionic, water-soluble, polysaccharide derivatives commonly used as inactive ingredients in foods, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. We also examined the effectiveness of CEs when administered at various times post- or pre-infection in prion-infected animals. In addition, we examined the pharmacokinetics, biological features, structure-activity relationships, and effectiveness of CEs in other prion disease models, and mechanism of action. Finally the significance of the findings is discussed.
Results
Post-infection prophylactic effects
Hydroxypropyl methylcelluloses (HPMCs) were mainly used in this study because these compounds are the most popularly utilized CEs. First, we analyzed the post-infection effectiveness of HPMCs, which had similar contents of methyl modification [ca. 1.91 mol/anhydrous glucose unit (AGU)] and hydroxypropyl modification (0.24 mol/AGU), but different viscosities. Chemical summaries and cumulative molar masses of molecular weight distribution of HPMCs are shown in Fig 1a. It is obvious that depending on the viscosity, each HPMC had a distinct molecular weight distribution of polymers with certain ranges of molecular sizes.
Because it is expected that macromolecules are not delivered from the blood to the brain parenchyma through the blood–brain barrier, HPMCs were continuously infused into the cerebral ventricle to bypass the blood–brain barrier, as described in a previous study on pentosan polysulfate [12]. A 4-week continuous intracerebroventricular infusion (150 μg/day) of HPMC samples when given 3 days post-infection (dpi) demonstrated remarkable extension of survival times in Tg7 mice expressing hamster prion protein (PrP) [13–15] intracerebrally infected with the hamster-adapted 263K prion [16]. Although two of the most viscous HPMC samples could not be tested because of difficulty in handling the solution, the most effective was 60SH-50, which extended the median survival time by about 4-fold (62 days → 238 days), as compared to the vehicle control (Fig 1b).
On the other hand, unlike the case of previously reported macromolecules, such as pentosan polysulfate [12], it was interesting that a single subcutaneous injection (4 g/kg body weight) of HPMCs when given immediately after infection, demonstrated remarkable extension of survival times in Tg7 mice intracerebrally infected with the 263K prion. The most effective was also 60SH-50, which extended the median survival time by about 3-fold (48 days → 155.5 days), as compared to the vehicle control (Fig 1c).
When the median survival time (% of vehicle control) of HPMC-treated animals was plotted against HPMC viscosity, efficacy was obviously related to viscosity. The efficacy–viscosity relationships were bell-shaped, and an HPMC with a viscosity of approximately 100 mPa•s in a 2% solution at 20°C (equivalent to a 140-glucose-unit size) was most effective (Fig 1d). Meanwhile, CEs as short as hexamers were still effective when administered into the cerebral ventricle, although the effectiveness was not as remarkable as with large-sized CEs (S1 Fig).
The relationship between dosage and effectiveness revealed that efficacy was dependent on dosage by either single subcutaneous injection or 4-week continuous intracerebroventricular infusion (S2 Fig). Next, we determined whether variations in methyl or hydroxypropyl modification had any effect on the efficacy of CEs with similar viscosities and found that efficacy was not associated with the variations conferred by methyl or hydroxypropyl modifications (S3 Fig). In addition, we investigated whether contaminated materials had any effect on the efficacy of CEs and found that efficacy was not associated with contaminant removal by activated carbon treatment (S4 Fig). Although age [17] and sex [18,19] are known to affect the incubation times of prion-infected rodents at some instances, but the observed CE efficacy was similar in animals irrespective of these variables (S5 Fig).
Post-infection prophylactic effects in peripheral infection
A single injection of a representative HPMC, TC-5RW, into either the peritoneal cavity or the tail vein demonstrated considerable efficacy in intracerebrally infected animals (S6a Fig). However, daily oral administration of TC-5RW to intracerebrally infected animals was not effective, even if it was started before they contracted the infection (S6b Fig). This result may be due to the poor intestinal absorption of CEs [20].
On the other hand, in the case of peripheral infection such as intraperitoneal infection, CE efficacy was enhanced, as compared to that of intracerebral infection. For instance, daily oral administration of TC-5RW, which was ineffective against intracerebral infection, was remarkably effective, as continuous treatment with a diet containing 15% TC-5RW from 7 dpi extended the median survival times of animals by about 3-fold (98 days → 296 days) (Fig 2a). A single subcutaneous injection of TC-5RW (4 g/kg body weight) at 3 dpi extended the median survival times of animals by about 6.7-fold (97 days → 651.5 days) (Fig 2b). The results suggest that even a small amount of CE absorbed through the intestinal tract is effective over a long period of time in case of peripheral infection, although absorption of CEs in the intestinal tract is reportedly very limited when orally administered [20].
Post-symptomatic therapeutic effects
Because symptom onset in Tg7 mice was not clearly determined, Syrian hamsters were used. Syrian hamsters infected with the 263K prion showed ataxia or unstable gait as an initial obvious disease sign at approximately 60 dpi. Thus, we examined the effectiveness of TC-5RW given in pre-symptomatic or post-symptomatic disease stages. Similar to that of previously reported anti-prion materials [12,21], the efficacy of CEs decreased with the delay of post-infection timing of injection (Fig 3). A single administration of TC-5RW at an early symptomatic stage (65 dpi) although significantly effective, had a very limited effect on extending the survival.
Pre-infection prophylactic effects
Because the effectiveness of a single post-infection CE administration continued over a long period, we examined the effectiveness of a single CE administration given months before infection and found that HPMCs given in a single subcutaneous injection prior to infection were still clearly effective. HPMCs given 6 or 12 months prior to infection were slightly less effective than, or as effective as, those given immediately after infection; even HPMCs given 19 months before infection were still markedly effective (Fig 4a).
When the median survival time (% of vehicle control) of HPMC-treated animals was plotted against the administration timing, efficacy tended to gradually decrease according to the pre-infection interval (Fig 4b). However, there was no significant difference in median survival times between the immediate post-infection intervention group and the 12-month pre-infection intervention group injected with 60SH-50 or 60SH-400. The most potent HPMC in the 12-month pre-infection intervention was slightly more viscous than the most potent HPMC in the post-infection intervention (Figs 1d and 4c).
Pre-infection prophylactic effects of CEs were also observed in Syrian hamsters (S7 Fig). By intraperitoneal infection, 60SH-50 or 60SH-400 extended the survival times of animals treated at the 0-month pre-infection by about 3.8-fold (233 days → about 890 days) and that of animals treated at the 13-month pre-infection by about 2.0- to 2.3-fold (195 days → 398 ~ 449 days). Therefore, it is obvious that even a single administration of CEs not only around the time of infection, but also as long as one year prior to infection, effectively extended the survival times of prion-infected animals.
Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously injected CE
To elucidate the mechanism of action of CEs, pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously injected radiolabeled TC-5RW were investigated in Tg7 mice. Immediately after injection, radiolabeled TC-5RW was taken up into the blood (S8a Fig) and excreted in the urine and feces at a rate of 70% of the initial dose within 3 days. Thereafter, it was excreted considerably more slowly, with 20% of the initial dose remaining in the body 2 weeks post-injection (S8b Fig). GPC analysis indicated that smaller-sized molecules of TC-5RW were preferentially excreted in the urine and feces, and larger-sized molecules remained in the plasma (S8c Fig).
Next, long-term pharmacokinetics and distribution were investigated in Tg7 mice given a single subcutaneous dose of radiolabeled TC-5RW. Radiolabeled TC-5RW was distributed in various tissues for long periods, but a little was found in the brain parenchyma, where prions accumulate and cause neurodegeneration (Fig 5a and 5b). Even after 6 months, amounts up to a few percent of the injected dose per gram of tissue or fluid were observed in various body parts, such as the adrenal cortex, choroid plexus, mandibular gland, thyroid gland, lymph, spleen, and skin, whereas less than 0.02 percent of the injected dose per gram of tissue (equivalent to ~10 μg/g tissue) was observed in the brain parenchyma. The elimination half-life of TC-5RW in these tissues was 50–350 days (Fig 5c) and longest elimination half-life periods were observed in the skeletal muscle, adrenal cortex, brain, and testis. GPC analysis revealed that larger portions of administered TC-5RW remained in tissues (Fig 5d). Consequently, a persistent residue of CE in the body is linked to long-lasting effects.
Macrophage uptake analysis
Because CEs have been recognized to be biologically inactive macromolecules, we speculated that macrophages might be involved in the degradation and excretion of CEs administered in the body. Thus, we investigated macrophage uptake of CEs using fluorescein–labeled HPMCs and peritoneal macrophages of Tg7 mice and found that macrophage uptake ratios of HPMCs differed from each other and were independent of viscosity (Fig 6a). When compared with the data of the median survival times (% of vehicle control) of Tg7 mice treated with a single subcutaneous dose of HPMCs, the macrophage uptake ratio was inversely correlated, particularly with the survival time of 12-month pre-infection intervention, rather than that of the immediate post-infection intervention (Fig 6b). Therefore, more effective HPMCs in pre-infection protection were phagocytized to a lesser extent by macrophages.
Structure–activity study
As a representative CE compound, methyl cellulose SM-4 was used for structure–activity studies. The chemical properties of tested compounds are shown in Fig 7a. The results of survival analysis of Tg7 mice treated with each compound are shown in Fig 7b. Comparison of SMR vs. SM-4 and SMR-HP vs. SMOx-HP indicated that a reduced modification of the reducing end produced better effects. Diethylaminoethyl modification (SMR-DEAE) produced the most excellent effects; carboxymethyl modification (SMR-CM) produced similar effects as hydroxypropyl modification (SMR-HP). In contrast to these hydrophilic modifications, hydrophobic modifications with a propyl group (SMR-PR and SMR-PR-HB) were much less effective than unmodified SMR. Further propyl group modification (SMR-PR-HB) was less effective than less modification (SMR-PR). These results suggest that the hydrophilicity of the CEs contributes to the effectiveness.
Hydroxypropyl and methyl ether compounds with sugar backbones other than cellulose were also analyzed in intracerebrally prion-infected Tg7 mice by a similar manner as performed with CEs. Tested sugar structures included dextran, dextrin, pullulan, starch, chitin, chitosan, and cyclodextrin. These polysaccharide ethers were ineffective (S1 Table), suggesting that the cellulose backbone is essential for effective protection against prion diseases.
CE efficacies in other prion disease animal models
The effects of CEs were also investigated in C57BL/6 mice intracerebrally infected with mouse-adapted prion strains (RML scrapie prion and Fukuoka-1 human prion disease prion in Fig 8, and 22L scrapie prion in S9a Fig). The effects of CEs were significantly observed in all of the disease animal models, but were less remarkable than those observed in the 263K prion-infected Tg7 mice. Because it is inferable that animals with shorter incubation periods, such as Tg7 mice and Syrian hamsters, might show more remarkable CE effects than animals with longer incubation periods, we examined the effects of CEs in Tga20 mice, which have substantially shorter incubation periods to mouse-adapted prion strains [22]. The effects of CEs in Tga20 mice were significant but less remarkable (S9b Fig).
Therefore, prion disease animal models influenced the effects of CEs, and prion strain-associated factors or animal genetic backgrounds might contribute to the variation in CE efficacy. One example of the influence of the animal genetic background was demonstrated in the comparison between ddY and ICR mice. Both mice are outbred strains similarly used in drug toxicity and pharmacokinetic studies, but obvious differences in CE efficacy were observed between these mice (S10 Fig).
Effects on PrP expression and conversion
In prion diseases, normal PrP (PrPC) is conformationally converted to an abnormal protease-resistant PrP (PrPSc) as the main component of the prion [1]. However, administration of CEs did not modify the protein or gene expression level of PrP in the brain or spleen (Fig 9a and 9b). On the other hand, administration of CEs inhibited 263K prion amplification in the protein misfolding cyclic amplification reaction, which is a method to amplify PrPSc in vitro [23], whereas a control compound, hydroxypropyl methyl dextran (70 kDa), did not inhibit amplification (Fig 9c). Similarly, in persistently RML prion-infected cells [24], CEs inhibited PrPSc formation in accordance with their in-vivo potencies, although higher concentrations of CEs were needed (Fig 9d). CE administration did not affect the expression levels of total PrPC or cell surface PrPC of the cells (Fig 9e and 9f). These results suggest that CEs inhibit PrPC–PrPSc conversion without affecting PrPC metabolism.
Discussion
CEs as new anti-prion compounds
The results of the present study revealed that CEs, as new types of anti-prion compounds, can effectively extend the life span of animals infected with prion not only peripherally but also intracerebrally, even though CEs are macromolecules that are hardly capable of reaching the brain parenchyma. CEs share no similarities in their structures or chemical properties with previously reported anti-prion polymers, such as sulfated glycans [25,26], polyamines [27–31], and cationic dendrimers [32–35]. Unlike these anionic and cationic polymers, CEs are non-ionic but hydrophilic.
The long-lasting efficacy of CEs is an astonishing, distinct feature from any other compounds previously reported [3–6,36–38]; a single post-infection subcutaneous injection of CEs extended the life spans of peripherally infected mice nearly to natural life spans and extended the life spans of intracerebrally infected mice by 2–3 fold. More astonishing is the pre-exposure prophylactic effects of CEs, as no significant difference in efficacy was observed in the most effective CE administered at an immediate post-infection or at one year pre-infection. No other compounds or biological materials exogenously administered have been reported to achieve these levels of post-infection and pre-infection prophylactic effects in peripherally or intracerebrally prion-infected animals.
Biological and chemical properties of effective CEs
CE molecules were distributed throughout the body within days after a single subcutaneous injection, and larger-sized portions of the molecules were retained in the body for months. The ability of CE residues to remain in the body is associated with the long-lasting protective effects of CEs. Chemically, the long-lasting protective efficacies of CEs were associated with the molecular size, but not the degree of modification to the methyl or hydroxypropyl group. Biologically, long-lasting protective efficacies were significantly associated with macrophage uptake ratios: CEs less phagocytized by macrophages were more effective. These data appear to be consistent with the structure-activity data, which shown that the efficacies of CEs were abolished by hydrophobic, but not hydrophilic, modifications. This can be explained by the findings of Tabata and Ikada who reported that microspheres with hydrophobic surfaces are more readily phagocytized than those with hydrophilic surfaces [39]. Therefore, it is presumable that macrophages play a crucial role in the efficacies of CEs and that phagocytosis facilitates the decomposition or excretion of CEs.
Mechanism of action of CEs
CEs are unlikely to affect the metabolism or turnover of PrPC because the expression levels of PrPC were not modified in tissues of TC-5RW-treated mice or TC-5RW-treated culture cells. However, CEs might directly inhibit the conversion of PrPC to PrPSc (namely prion formation) in prion-infected animals because of the following findings: TC-5RW inhibited prion formation in the protein misfolding cyclic amplification reaction; CEs were remarkably effective when infused into the cerebroventricular system; and radioactivity of TC-5RW was observed in the brain parenchyma at an amount of less than 10 μg/g tissue equivalent and was eliminated very slowly in the brain parenchyma at a half-life of about one year.
On the other hand, there was a gap in the CE concentration required for inhibition of prion formation among the assay systems. CE concentration of less than 10 μg/g tissue equivalent was needed in the mouse brain, and this concentration appeared to be similar to that of the protein misfolding cyclic amplification reaction (~10 μg/mL), whereas it was different from that of the prion-infected cells (~1 mg/mL). Because the prion strain differed among these assay systems, the CE concentration gap might reflect the prion strain dependency of CE action: significantly effective against the 263K prion, but much less effective against the RML prion. However, it is possible that the mechanism of action of CEs differs among the assay systems, and the possibility cannot be ruled out that other factors, such as CE-metabolites or CE-induced host factors, are responsible for the anti-prion activities of CEs in animals.
CE efficacy is influenced by prion disease animal models
Although CE effects were significantly observed in all prion disease animal models tested in the present study (except for the ICR mouse model), CE effects in animals infected with mouse-adapted prions were not as remarkable as those of animals infected with the 263K hamster-adapted prion. In addition, CE effects were not necessarily remarkable in animal models with shorter incubation periods. Thus, these findings imply that CE effects may be influenced by the prion strain or animal genetic background.
Because no animals with an identical genetic background are available for comparison of CE efficacies against hamster-adapted prions vs. mouse-adapted prions, it is not possible at the present time to verify the influence associated with prion strains. Regarding the animal genetic background, Tg7 mice have a mixed background with 129/Ola and C57BL/10 [13–15]. Thus, the genetic background of Tg7 mice is very different from that of C57BL/6, whereas Tga20 mice have a genetic background close to C57BL/6 [22]. Accordingly, the animal genetic background might influence the effects of CEs. Although this inference remains to be elucidated, the data of the comparison between ddY and ICR mice are suggestive of inference.
CEs as a preventive drug model
Tremendous efforts have been made to conduct clinical trials or experimental treatments of several compounds [40–45]. However, there have been no meaningful outcomes in regard to patient benefit. One of the reasons clinical trials commonly fail in terms of survival is supposed to be delayed intervention. In prion-infected animals, the larger delay in intervention, the less effective anti-prion compounds are at prolonging survival [12,21]. The most opportune time for therapeutic intervention of prion diseases is very early in the preclinical stage because exponentially accumulated amounts of the prion almost reach a plateau in the brain around the stage of symptomatic disease [46,47].
Because the effectiveness of CEs administered after disease onset were also very limited, despite being statistically significant, therapeutic effects are hardly expected for intervention after disease onset. However, significantly beneficial effectiveness of CEs might be expected by immediate post-infection or pre-exposure prophylactic intervention. Especially at peripheral infection, a few or several injections of CEs might be sufficiently preventive to keep infected individuals healthy for the expected lifetime. However, the safety properties of CEs remain to be evaluated and drug availability to target tissues must be improved before the dosing regimen can be optimized.
In conclusion, it is not yet clear how polymers, such as CEs, peripherally administered suppress the disease process in the brain and extend survival. It is also unclear how CE efficacy is influenced by prion strains or host genetic factors. These enigmas await further elucidation. However, the findings of this study suggest that CEs may be something in daily life that modify disease onset and could be useful for the development of preventive measures against prion diseases.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
All animal experiments were performed in accordance with protocols reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tohoku University (approval numbers 20MdA-54, 21MdA-192, 22MdA-247, 2011MdA-347, 2012MdA-272, 2013MdA-194, and 2016MdA-139). The animal care and use protocols adhered to the Fundamental Guidelines for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiment and Related Activities in Academic Research Institutions by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Notice No. 71 issued on June 1, 2006), the Standards Relating to the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals and Relief of Pain by the Ministry of the Environment (Notice No. 84 issued on August 30, 2013), and the Act on Welfare and Management of Animals (revised on September 5, 2012) in Japan.
CEs
All HPMC compounds were kindly provided by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Compound properties are listed in Fig 1a. Methyl cellulose (SM-4) was also provided by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. All SM-4 derivatives were synthesized from SM-4 by Meito Sangyo Co., Ltd. (Nagoya, Japan). A chemical summary of SM-4 and its derivatives is presented in Fig 7a.
Animal study
Tg7 mice, kindly provided by Dr. Bruce Chesebro of the Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases of NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories (Hamilton, MT, USA), were mainly used in the study because they have substantially shorter incubation times than Syrian hamsters when intracerebrally infected with the hamster-adapted 263K scrapie prion [13–15]. Tg7 mice are derived from transgenic Tg10 mice [13] and are crossed onto a mouse PrP-null background [48]. Thus, Tg7 mice lack endogenous mouse PrPC expression but express hamster PrPC at about 4 times the level of that expressed by wild-type mice in the brain and at a level similar to that expressed by wild-type mice in the spleen (S11 Fig). Six- to 10-week-old male mice were used for all experiments, unless otherwise stated. Intracerebral or intraperitoneal infection was performed by inoculation with 20 or 100 μL, respectively, of a 1% (w/v) brain homogenate obtained from a terminally ill 263K prion-infected hamster. In case of continuous intracerebroventricular infusion, continuous infusion into the cerebral third ventricle was performed using an osmotic minipump and brain infusion kit, as previously described [49]. Mice were monitored every day until the time of terminal disease, at which time the mice were akinetic (with a lack of grooming behavior, coordination, and parachute reaction) or exhibited a rigid tail, an arched back, and weight loss of approximately 10% within one week. The mice were killed at this stage and disease was confirmed by immunoblotting and immunohistochemical analyses of abnormal PrP deposition in the brain, as previously described [12,49]. Because it was difficult to determine the time of symptom onset in the animal model used in this study, survival time was defined as the time from prion infection to terminal disease.
Experiments with Syrian hamsters and other mice were performed in a similar manner, as described above. Syrian hamsters and C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Japan SLC, Inc. (Hamamatsu, Japan). In the case of post-infection CE administration into intraperitoneally prion-infected hamsters, hamsters in all experimental groups were given a single subcutaneous injection of CEs in such a manner that all intraperitoneal prion infections were performed with animals of the same age.
Pharmacokinetics of 14C-TC-5RW
14C-TC-5RW was synthesized by the condensation of NaOH-treated TC-5RW with 14C-methyl iodide, and a pharmacokinetic study of 14C-TC-5RW in Tg7 mice was performed at Sekisui Medical Co., Ltd. (Tsukuba, Japan) as follows. A designated amount of 14C-TC-5RW in saline was subcutaneously injected into the backs of mice. After a designated interval, mice under deep anesthesia were frozen and embedded in 4% carboxymethyl cellulose-Na. Whole-body 30-μm-thick sections were cut with a cryomicrotome and dried. Sections accompanied by radioactive standards were exposed to imaging plates and radioluminograms were analyzed with a BAS2500 bio-imaging analyzer (Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan). Considering both the standard calibration curve data and the 14C-TC-5RW specific radioactivity, radioactivity levels in each tissue or fluid sample were calculated from the radioluminograms. Elimination half-life was calculated using the following formula: elimination half-life (days) = –ln2/β, where β is the slope obtained from the simple linear regression of the natural logarithm of radioactivity levels on post-injection days. To measure the molecular sizes of 14C-TC-5RW residues in tissues, tissue samples were homogenized with five volumes of 0.1 N NaOH on ice, and the supernatants after centrifugation at 12,000×g were subjected to GPC analysis. Samples were separated on an OHpak SB-804 HQ column (Showa Denko, Tokyo, Japan) and eluted with 0.1 M NaCl at 1 mL/min and 35°C. Each 0.5-min fraction was mixed with the scintillation cocktail and radioactivity was assayed by liquid scintillation counting.
Macrophage uptake analysis
Fluorescein-labeled HPMCs were produced as follows. HPMC in dimethylformamide (0.3 g/30 mL) was mixed with fluorescein-5-carbonyl azide diacetate (1.5 mg). The mixture was purged with N2 gas and agitated at 90°C for 3 h. Labeled HPMC was recovered and then purified using repeated precipitation–solubilization steps. Residual solids were dissolved in NaHCO3 solution (100 mM, pH 8.0) at room temperature for 8 h to remove the acetyl-protecting groups and subsequently dialyzed against deionized water. The solution was filtered through a 0.45-μm pore size filter (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and then lyophilized. Fluorescein-labeled HPMCs showed no fluorescence signals in the low-molecular-weight fractions on a GPC instrument equipped with a fluorescence detector (column, OHpak SB-804 HQ; detection, excitation at 494 nm and recording at 520 nm). Peritoneal macrophages were obtained from Tg7 mice by conventional thioglycollate induction. Cells (3 × 105) were incubated with fluorescein-labeled HPMC (1 mg/mL) in culture medium for 1 day and then rinsed twice and lysed in a lysis buffer (0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4). The amount of fluorescein-labeled HPMC in the cell lysate was determined by GPC analysis.
PrP expression analysis
Brains were homogenized in two volumes of TN buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7.5) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail. Spleens were homogenized and sonicated in 13 volumes of TN buffer supplemented with 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, and the protease inhibitor cocktail. After low-speed centrifugation, aliquots of supernatant containing the same protein amount were analyzed for PrPC protein levels by immunoblotting with the anti-PrP monoclonal antibody 3F4 (BioLegend, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), as previously described [19]. To analyze PrP mRNA expression, the brains and spleens of Tg7 mice were lysed using an RNA extraction reagent. Total RNA was extracted and cDNA was synthesized using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Takara Bio, Inc., Kyoto, Japan). The PrP mRNA level was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction, as previously described [49].
Protein misfolding cyclic amplification
According to a previously described method [50], a reaction mixture containing 0.1% 263K prion-infected hamster brain homogenate and 10% normal hamster brain homogenate underwent 96 cycles of sonication and incubation with an automatic cross-ultrasonic apparatus (ELESTEIN 070-GOTW; Elekon Science Corp., Chiba, Japan). TC-5RW or hydroxypropyl methyl dextran (70 kDa) was added to the reaction mixture before starting the reactions at concentrations ranging 10 μg/mL to 1 mg/mL. After the reactions, the samples were digested with 100 μg/mL of proteinase K at 37°C for 1 h and levels of protease-resistant PrPSc were detected by immunoblotting with 3F4.
Analysis in prion-infected cells
Mouse neuroblastoma cells either uninfected (N2a cells) or persistently infected with the RML prion (ScN2a cells [24]) were kindly provided by Dr. Byron Caughey of the Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases of NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories (Hamilton, MT, USA) and used as previously described [21,51,52]. Briefly, cells were cultured in the presence of test compounds for 3 days. Cells grown to confluency were washed with PBS and lysed with lysis buffer (0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, PBS, pH 7.4). For the detection of PrPSc, cell lysate was treated with 10 μg/mL of proteinase K at 37°C for 30 min and subsequently with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Then, PrPSc were precipitated by centrifugation at 10,000 × g and suspended in a sample loading buffer. To detect PrPC and β-actin, cell lysate was used without further treatments and mixed with a concentrated loading buffer. Immunoblotting analysis was performed using the anti-PrP monoclonal antibody SAF83 (SPI-Bio, Massy, France) and anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody, as described previously [49]
The cell surface of PrPC was analyzed by flow cytometry, as described in previous reports [21,49,52]. Briefly, N2a cells incubated in the presence of test compounds for 3 days were dispersed using 0.1% collagenase and washed with ice-cold 0.5% fetal calf serum in PBS. Then, the cells were immunoreacted with SAF83 or isotype control IgG1 for 30 min on ice, and subsequently with goat F(ab’)2 fragment anti-mouse IgG (H+L)-FITC (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) for 30 min on ice. Then, the cells were analyzed using an EPICS XL-ADC flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.).
Statistical analysis
Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and significance was evaluated using the log-rank method. Statistical linear correlations were evaluated by the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. All analyses were performed using Excel Toukei, a statistical analysis software (SSRI Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Y. Fujiwara and T. Yokoyama for technical assistance, and T. Kitamoto and S. Mohri for discussion.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by grants from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (http://www.amed.go.jp/en/) (15ek0109012h0002, 16ek0109012h0003), National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (http://www.nibiohn.go.jp/nibio/english/index.html) (06-43), Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/index.html) (nanchi-ippan-H19-006/-H22-009/-H26-017), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/index.html) (22390172), and Itoham Foods Inc. (http://www.itoham.co.jp/english/index.html), Japan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Prusiner SB. Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95: 13363–13383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nozaki I, Hamaguchi T, Sanjo N, Noguchi-Shinohara M, Sakai K, Nakamura Y, et al. Prospective 10-year surveillance of human prion diseases in Japan. Brain 2010;133: 3043–3057. 10.1093/brain/awq216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Trevitt CR, Collinge J. A systematic review of prion therapeutics in experimental models. Brain 2006;129: 2241–2265. 10.1093/brain/awl150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sim VL, Caughey B. Recent advances in prion chemotherapeutics. Infect Disord Drug Targets 2009;9: 81–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Teruya K, Kawagoe K, Kimura T, Chen CJ, Sakasegawa Y, Doh-ura K. Amyloidophilic compounds for prion diseases. Infect Disord Drug Targets 2009;9: 15–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bolognesi ML, Legname G. Approaches for discovering anti-prion compounds: lessons learned and challenges ahead. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015;10: 389–397. 10.1517/17460441.2015.1016498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baron T, Biacabe AG, Arsac JN, Benestad S, Groschup MH. Atypical transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) in ruminants. Vaccine 2007;25: 5625–5630. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.10.058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Haley NJ, Hoover EA. Chronic wasting disease of cervids: current knowledge and future perspectives. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2015;3: 305–325. 10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-111001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mabbott NA. Prospects for safe and effective vaccines against prion diseases. Expert Rev Vaccines 2015;14: 1–4. 10.1586/14760584.2015.965691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goni F, Mathiason CK, Yim L, Wong K, Hayes-Klug J, Nalls A, et al. Mucosal immunization with an attenuated Salmonella vaccine partially protects white-tailed deer from chronic wasting disease. Vaccine 2015;33: 726–733. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aguzzi A, Nuvolone M, Zhu C. The immunobiology of prion diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13: 888–902. 10.1038/nri3553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Doh-ura K, Ishikawa K, Murakami-Kubo I, Sasaki K, Mohri S, Race R, et al. Treatment of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy by intraventricular drug infusion in animal models. J Virol. 2004;78: 4999–5006. 10.1128/JVI.78.10.4999-5006.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Race RE, Priola SA, Bessen RA, Ernst D, Dockter J, Rall GF, et al. Neuron-specific expression of a hamster prion protein minigene in transgenic mice induces susceptibility to hamster scrapie agent. Neuron 1995;15: 1183–1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Race R, Oldstone M, Chesebro B. Entry versus blockade of brain infection following oral or intraperitoneal scrapie administration: role of prion protein expression in peripheral nerves and spleen. J Virol. 2000;74: 828–833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Priola SA, Raines A, Caughey WS. Porphyrin and phthalocyanine antiscrapie compounds. Science 2000;287: 1503–1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kimberlin RH, Walker CA. Evidence that the transmission of one source of scrapie agent to hamsters involves separation of agent strains from a mixture. J Gen Virol. 1978;39: 487–496. 10.1099/0022-1317-39-3-487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brown KL, Wathne GJ, Sales J, Bruce ME, Mabbott NA. The effects of host age on follicular dendritic cell status dramatically impair scrapie agent neuroinvasion in aged mice. J Immunol. 2009;183: 5199–5207. 10.4049/jimmunol.0802695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Akhtar S, Wenborn A, Brandner S, Collinge J, Lloyd SE. Sex effects in mouse prion disease incubation time. PLoS One 2011;6: e28741 10.1371/journal.pone.0028741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kimura T, Nishizawa K, Oguma A, Nishimura Y, Sakasegawa Y, Teruya K, et al. Secretin receptor involvement in prion-infected cells and animals. FEBS Lett. 2015;589: 2011–2018. 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.05.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gorzinski SJ, Takahashi IT, Hurst GH. The fate of ultra-low viscosity 14C-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in rats following gavage administration. Drug Chem Toxicol. 1986;9: 83–100. 10.3109/01480548608998268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kawasaki Y, Kawagoe K, Chen CJ, Teruya K, Sakasegawa Y, Doh-ura K. Orally administered amyloidophilic compound is effective in prolonging the incubation periods of animals cerebrally infected with prion diseases in a prion strain-dependent manner. J Virol. 2007;81: 12889–12898. 10.1128/JVI.01563-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fischer M, Rulicke T, Raeber A, Sailer A, Moser M, Oesch B, et al. Prion protein (PrP) with amino-proximal deletions restoring susceptibility of PrP knockout mice to scrapie. EMBO J. 1996;15: 1255–1264. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Saborio GP, Permanne B, Soto C. Sensitive detection of pathological prion protein by cyclic amplification of protein misfolding. Nature 2001;411: 810–813. 10.1038/35081095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Race RE, Caughey B, Graham K, Ernst D, Chesebro B. Analyses of frequency of infection, specific infectivity, and prion protein biosynthesis in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma cell clones. J Virol. 1988;62: 2845–2849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Farquhar C, Dickinson A, Bruce M. Prophylactic potential of pentosan polysulphate in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Lancet 1999;353: 117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Caughey B, Raymond GJ. Sulfated polyanion inhibition of scrapie-associated PrP accumulation in cultured cells. J Virol. 1993;67: 643–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Supattapone S, Nguyen HO, Cohen FE, Prusiner SB, Scott MR. Elimination of prions by branched polyamines and implications for therapeutics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96: 14529–14534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Supattapone S, Wille H, Uyechi L, Safar J, Tremblay P, Szoka FC, et al. Branched polyamines cure prion-infected neuroblastoma cells. J Virol. 2001;75: 3453–3461. 10.1128/JVI.75.7.3453-3461.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lim YB, Mays CE, Kim Y, Titlow WB, Ryou C. The inhibition of prions through blocking prion conversion by permanently charged branched polyamines of low cytotoxicity. Biomaterials 2010;31: 2025–2033. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ryou C, Titlow WB, Mays CE, Bae Y, Kim S. The suppression of prion propagation using poly-L-lysine by targeting plasminogen that stimulates prion protein conversion. Biomaterials 2011;32: 3141–3149. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jackson KS, Yeom J, Han Y, Bae Y, Ryou C. Preference toward a polylysine enantiomer in inhibiting prions. Amino Acids 2013;44: 993–1000. 10.1007/s00726-012-1430-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Solassol J, Crozet C, Perrier V, Leclaire J, Beranger F, Caminade AM, et al. Cationic phosphorus-containing dendrimers reduce prion replication both in cell culture and in mice infected with scrapie. J Gen Virol. 2004;85: 1791–1799. 10.1099/vir.0.19726-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cordes H, Boas U, Olsen P, Heegaard PM. Guanidino- and urea-modified dendrimers as potent solubilizers of misfolded prion protein aggregates under non-cytotoxic conditions. dependence on dendrimer generation and surface charge. Biomacromolecules 2007;8: 3578–3583. 10.1021/bm7006168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McCarthy JM, Rasines Moreno B, Filippini D, Komber H, Maly M, Cernescu M, et al. Influence of surface groups on poly(propylene imine) dendrimers antiprion activity. Biomacromolecules 2013;14: 27–37. 10.1021/bm301165u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fischer M, Appelhans D, Schwarz S, Klajnert B, Bryszewska M, Voit B, et al. Influence of surface functionality of poly(propylene imine) dendrimers on protease resistance and propagation of the scrapie prion protein. Biomacromolecules 2010;11: 1314–1325. 10.1021/bm100101s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wagner J, Ryazanov S, Leonov A, Levin J, Shi S, Schmidt F, et al. Anle138b: a novel oligomer modulator for disease-modifying therapy of neurodegenerative diseases such as prion and Parkinson's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125: 795–813. 10.1007/s00401-013-1114-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ghaemmaghami S, Russo M, Renslo AR. Successes and challenges in phenotype-based lead discovery for prion diseases. J Med Chem. 2014;57: 6919–6929. 10.1021/jm5001425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kuwata K. Logical design of medical chaperone for prion diseases. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13: 2432–2440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tabata Y, Ikada Y. Effect of the size and surface charge of polymer microspheres on their phagocytosis by macrophage. Biomaterials 1988;9: 356–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Otto M, Cepek L, Ratzka P, Doehlinger S, Boekhoff I, Wiltfang J, et al. Efficacy of flupirtine on cognitive function in patients with CJD: A double-blind study. Neurology 2004;62: 714–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Collinge J, Gorham M, Hudson F, Kennedy A, Keogh G, Pal S, et al. Safety and efficacy of quinacrine in human prion disease (PRION-1 study): a patient-preference trial. Lancet Neurol 2009;8: 334–344. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70049-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Geschwind MD, Kuo AL, Wong KS, Haman A, Devereux G, Raudabaugh BJ, et al. Quinacrine treatment trial for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology 2013;81: 2015–2023. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a9f3b4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Haïk S, Marcon G, Mallet A, Tettamanti M, Welaratne A, Giaccone G, et al. Doxycycline in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13: 150–158. 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70307-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tsuboi Y, Doh-ura K, Yamada T Continuous intraventricular infusion of pentosan polysulfate: clinical trial against prion diseases. Neuropathology 2009;29: 632–636. 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2009.01058.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Newman PK, Todd NV, Scoones D, Mead S, Knight RS, Will RG, et al. Postmortem findings in a case of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease treated with intraventricular pentosan polysulfate. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85: 921–924. 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Prusiner SB. Prions and neurodegenerative diseases. N Engl J Med 1987;317: 1571–1581. 10.1056/NEJM198712173172505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sandberg MK, Al-Doujaily H, Sharps B, Clarke AR, Collinge J. Prion propagation and toxicity in vivo occur in two distinct mechanistic phases. Nature 2011;470: 540–542. 10.1038/nature09768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Manson JC, Clarke AR, Hooper ML, Aitchison L, McConnell I, Hope J. 129/Ola mice carrying a null mutation in PrP that abolishes mRNA production are developmentally normal. Mol Neurobiol. 1994;8: 121–127. 10.1007/BF02780662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nishizawa K, Oguma A, Kawata M, Sakasegawa Y, Teruya K, Doh-ura K. Efficacy and mechanism of a glycoside compound inhibiting abnormal prion protein formation in prion-infected cells: implications of interferon and phosphodiesterase 4D-interacting protein. J Virol. 2014;88: 4083–4099. 10.1128/JVI.03775-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yokoyama T, Takeuchi A, Yamamoto M, Kitamoto T, Ironside JW, Morita M. Heparin enhances the cell-protein misfolding cyclic amplification efficiency of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurosci Lett 2011;498: 119–123. 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ishikawa K, Kudo Y, Nishida N, Suemoto T, Sawada T, Iwaki T, et al. Styrylbenzoazole derivatives for imaging of prion plaques and treatment of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. J Neurochem. 2006;99: 198–205. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04035.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hamanaka T, Sakasegawa Y, Ohmoto A, Kimura T, Ando T, Doh-ura K. Anti-prion activity of protein-bound polysaccharide K in prion-infected cells and animals. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011:405: 285–290. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.01.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.