Abstract
Olive leaf, an agricultural by-product, was studied for the valorization of its biophenols using green extraction techniques; i.e. non-toxic and eco-friendly extraction solvents were used, involving water and glycerol. 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (CD), was also employed as an enhancer of the extraction, since cyclodextrins (CD’s) are known to improve the extractability of olive leaf polyphenols by forming water soluble inclusion complexes. The process was optimized by implementing a central composite (Box-Behnken) experimental design and response surface methodology, taking into consideration the following independent variables: glycerol concentration (C gl), CD concentration (C CD) and temperature (T). The evaluation of the extraction model was based on two responses: the total polyphenol yield (YTP) and the antiradical activity (AAR). Optimum values for the extraction process were obtained at 60% (w/v) glycerol content, T = 60 °C and 7% (w/v) CD content. LC–MS analysis was also applied in order to characterize the polyphenolic composition of extracts containing cyclodextrins. The main polyphenols present were oleuropein and oleuropein derivatives. Olive leaf aqueous extracts containing glycerol and cyclodextrins may be used as raw materials/ingredients for several end-users in the food, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13197-016-2381-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Cyclodextrins, Polyphenols, Inclusion complex formation, LC–MS analysis, Extraction
Introduction
Olive leaves (Olea europaea), by-products of olive farming, is a rich and cheap source of polyphenols that could be extracted and valorized for the development of products that promote health and wellbeing (Rahmanian et al. 2015). The most important class of phenolics in olive leaves are secoiridoids. Oleuropein, the main secoiridoid, is a complex phenol present in large quantities in olive tree leaves as well as in low concentrations in olive oil and is responsible for the bitter taste and pungent aroma of olive oil. Olive leaves also contain several flavonoids (apigenin, kaempferol, luteolin) as well as simple phenolic compounds such as caffeic acid, tyrosol, hydroxytytrosol (Talhaoui et al. 2014). Studies have shown that oleuropein is an important biophenol, as it acts as an antitumor compound and also exhibits anti-ischemic, antioxidative, hypolipidemic, antiviral, antimicrobial, antiatherogenic, cardioprotective, antihypertensive and anti-inflammatory properties (Visioli and Galli 1998; Singh et al. 2008).
The exploitation of plant by-products by the food industry is gaining ground and presents indisputable advantages, as it is not only a low-cost source of functional ingredients but also constitutes an environmentally friendly processing route, since it greatly simplifies waste disposal management strategies (Agourram et al. 2013; El-Baroty et al. 2014). Agro-wastes rich in phytochemicals have been already used as a natural source of antioxidants and antimicrobials in food products (Martins et al. 2014; Shah et al. 2014). Moreover, consumers tend to be rather skeptical lately towards chemical additives since consciousness has risen about toxicity and long-term detrimental health effects (Shah et al. 2014).
Phytochemicals from wastes and by-products generated during olive oil production processes have been obtained by conventional methods of extraction and also non-conventional methodologies involving the use of ultrasounds, microwaves, sub- and supercritical fluid extractions, pressurized liquid extraction, pulsed electric fields and high voltage electrical discharges, and targeting for high extraction yield, low cost and selectivity of extraction (Ahmad-Qasem et al. 2013; Rosello-Soto et al. 2015; Xynos et al. 2012).
Recently the principles of green engineering and green chemistry have been introduced in various extraction schemes with an aim to promote sustainable extraction processes, basically by using non-petroleum derived solvents and renewable plant residues as raw materials (Li et al. 2013). Glycerol a bio product of bio diesel industry could be considered as an ideal green non-conventional solvent for the extraction of polyphenols as it is non-toxic, non-flammable and has a high boiling point. Recent studies demonstrated that, aqueous glycerol mixtures might constitute a very suitable extraction medium for polyphenol recovery, since they possess a relatively low dielectric constant, which has been claimed to be a key characteristic regarding their solvency towards polyphenols that are otherwise sparingly soluble in pure water (Shehata et al. 2015). Cyclodextrins, a group of cyclic oligosaccharides (non-reducing molecules) which have the structure of a truncated cone (torus-like structures) and can act as host molecules in forming inclusion complexes with polyphenols (Đorđević et al. 2014; Pinho et al. 2014, 2015). Aqueous solutions of cyclodextrins can be considered as alternative, green solvents, since upon formation of complexes between the hydrophobic CD cavities and non-polar compounds (e.g. polyphenols), a reduction of the system’s energy can be achieved (Chemat et al. 2012; Đorđević et al. 2014).
The formation of inclusion complexes of olive leaf polyphenols with β-cyclodextrin has been already confirmed with differential scanning calorimetry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (Mourtzinos et al. 2007). Molecular encapsulation of olive leaf phenolic compounds into β-cyclodextrin could result in increased aqueous solubility due to changes in partitioning of the compounds in the oil/water binary system (Rodis et al. 2002), improved protection against oxidation during storage, and, possibly, a greater bioavailability of the extractants (guest compounds). Encapsulated forms of olive leaf extract, that retain the properties of bioactive ingredients have been already tested for the replacement of synthetic antioxidants (Mohammadi et al. 2016).
The aim of this study was to perform an optimization of an extraction process for efficient recovery of polyphenols from olive leaves, using water/glycerol/2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin ternary mixtures. The optimization was based on respond surface methodology that has been already used in order to optimize extraction of antioxidants (Singh et al. 2012); a Box-Behnken experimental design was adopted, and the responses measured were the total polyphenol yield (YTP) and the antiradical activity (AAR) of the extracts.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent was from Fluka (Sigma-Aldrich: Steinheim, Germany). 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (CD, average MW ~1460), gallic acid, trolox and the 2,2-diphenyl-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) stable radical were procured from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA.). Glycerol (>99%) was procured from Fisher Scientific (New Jersey, NJ, USA).
Plant material
Olive leaves (Olea europaea), without apparent damages and infections, were bought from a local supermarket (Thessaloniki, Greece). Leaves were dried at 65 °C for 48 h and grounded using a domestic blender (Bosch MMB 11R) and a cyclone sample mill (UDY, Fort Collins, USA), giving a powder with a particle size less than 0.3 mm. Dried and grounded olive leaves were stored at −20 °C until further use.
Extraction procedure
An amount of plant tissue fine powder was mixed with solvent (liquid-to-solid ratio 50 mL g−1), composed of varying concentrations of water (40–100% w/v), glycerol (0–60% w/v) and CD (1–13% w/v) in a stoppered glass bottle. The material was subjected to extraction under continuous stirring at 600 rpm for 180 min in a water bath at three different temperatures (40, 60, and 80 ± 1 °C). Following extraction, the dispersions were centrifuged in a table centrifuge (Hermle Z300 K, Wehingen, Germany) at 5000 rpm for 10 min. The clear supernatant was stored at −20 °C until used for further analysis.
Determination of total polyphenol yield (YTP) and antiradical activity (AAR)
The total polyphenol yield in the extracts (YTP) was determined according to a well-established protocol (Karakashov et al. 2015) using the Folin-Ciocalteu methodology; the results (YTP) were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g of dry olive leaf weight.
For AAR determination, a previously described protocol was essentially applied (Bassil et al. 2005). Briefly, an aliquot of 0.025 mL of the sample was added to 0.975 mL DPPH solution (100 μM in MeOH), and the absorbance was read at t = 0 and t = 30 min. Trolox™ equivalents (mM TRE) were determined from linear regression, after plotting %ΔA515 of known solutions of trolox™ against concentration, where
1 |
Results were expressed as μmol TRE per g of dry olive leaf weight.
Experimental design
A 23-full factorial, central composite design was used to identify the relationship between the response functions and process variables, as well as to determine those conditions that optimized extraction. The three independent variables or factors studied were 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin concentration (C CD), varying between 1 and 13% (w/v), glycerol concentration (C gl), varying between 0 and 60% (w/v) and temperature (T), varying between 40 and 80 °C. Value ranges were chosen on the basis of preliminary experimentation and previous studies (Kyriakidou et al. 2016). The independent variables were coded at three levels, −1, 0 and 1 (1, 7, 13 w/v for C CD, 0, 30, 60 w/v for C gl and 40, 60, 80 °C for T) according to the following equation:
2 |
where x i and X i are dimensionless, and the actual value of the independent variable i, X 0 is the actual value of the independent variable i at the central point, and ΔX i is the step change of X i corresponding to a unit variation of the dimensionless value. The extraction yield (YTP) and the antiradical activity (AAR) were chosen as the dependent variables or responses because of their well-known dependencies on the extraction process conditions.
The data obtained were subjected to regression analysis using least square methodology to obtain equations that described the response values as a function of the independent variables (mathematical models). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the statistical significance of the model. Insignificant dependent terms (p > 0.05) were omitted from the regression models derived, through a “backward elimination” process. Contour plots were subsequently obtained using the fitted model.
Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
A previously used method was employed for LC–MS (Apostolakis et al. 2014); a Finnigan MAT Spectra System P4000 pump was used coupled with a UV6000LP diode array detector and a Finnigan AQA mass spectrometer. Analyses were carried out on a Superspher RP-18, 125 × 2 mm, 4 μm, column (Macherey–Nagel, Germany), coupled with a guard column packed with the same material, and maintained at 40 °C. Analyses were carried out by employing electrospray ionisation (ESI) at the positive ion mode, with acquisition set at 12 and 50 eV, capillary voltage 4 kV, source voltage 4.9 kV, detector voltage 650 V and probe temperature 400 °C. Eluent (A) and eluent (B) were 2.5% acetic acid and methanol, respectively. The flow rate was 0.33 mL/min, the sample concentration was 5 mg GAE g−1 dw and the elution programme used was as follows: 0–5 min, 0% B; 5–30 min, 100% B; 30–35 min, 100% B.
Statistical analysis
Extractions were repeated twice and all analytical determinations were carried out at least in triplicate. The values obtained were averaged. The experiment design and response surface statistics were performed with JMP™ 10.
Results and discussion
Optimization of the extraction was carried out by evaluating the effect of the three selected independent variables; i.e. CD concentration (C CD), glycerol concentration (C gl) and temperature (T). Time of the extraction, is also a crucial parameter during a solid/liquid extraction and it has been optimized previously for olive leaf extracts (Apostolakis et al. 2014). The values of the responses (YTP and AAR) obtained experimentally were analyzed by multiple regression and after removal of the non-significant factors (p > 0.05). The significance of model fitting was assessed using the square coefficient of correlation (R 2), which was over than 0.93 (p < 0.05). This outcome clearly pointed to a statistically significant match between observed and predicted responses, and that the models can predict the optimal experimental conditions with high reliability. Τhe values of the independent process variables (X1:CD, X2:C gl and X3:T) considered, as well as measured and predicted values for all responses, are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Measured and predicted value of YTP and AAR, determined for individual design points, for the extractions performed with water/glycerol mixtures
Design point | Independent variables | Response (YTP, mg GAE g−1 dw) | Response (AAR, μmolTRE g−1 dw) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | Measured | Predicted | Measured | Predicted | |
1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 9.69 | 7.61 | 222.55 | 216.75 |
2 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 18.96 | 18.37 | 202.14 | 201.98 |
3 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 14.42 | 17.52 | 251.23 | 238.82 |
4 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 56.78 | 55.10 | 311.49 | 316.14 |
5 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 19.51 | 20.74 | 235.67 | 231.96 |
6 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 20.6 | 17.05 | 207 | 220.35 |
7 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 22.05 | 22.19 | 276.5 | 277.60 |
8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 43.69 | 45.317 | 351.35 | 358.09 |
9 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 22.24 | 23.49 | 183.18 | 196.90 |
10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 24.6 | 25.16 | 242.96 | 225.47 |
11 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 30.24 | 35.23 | 276.5 | 272.82 |
12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 57.51 | 54.32 | 352.81 | 352.72 |
13 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 23.15 | 20.76 | 249.28 | 270.09 |
14 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 33.51 | 37.70 | 327.53 | 302.95 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40.42 | 36.42 | 269.7 | 276.38 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36.05 | 36.42 | 275.53 | 276.38 |
Τhe polynomial equation of the YTP variable showed that there was a clear positive effect of C gl and T and also significant interaction effects between the two variables. The influence of C CD was clearly shown in the polynomial equation of AAR. On the contrary, the quadratic term of C CD had a negative impact in both cases of the dependent variables. In most plant extracts the values of YTP and AAR are directly proportional; however, different patterns have been reported and are attributed to synergism and/or antagonism among constituents present in the extracts (Makris et al. 2007; Karvela et al. 2012). The evolution of YTP and AAR as a function of simultaneous variation in the process variables are illustrated in the form of contour plots. As can be seen, maximization of YTP levels was observed when the glycerol content varied within 40–60%, whereas CD content and temperature showed optimum values for the extraction of olive leaf polyphenols at 7% (w/v) and 60 °C, respectively (Fig. 1a). A similar pattern was also noted with AAR (Fig. 1b), confirming optimum values for the extraction process at 60% (w/v) glycerol content, T = 60 °C and 7% (w/v) CD content. The reason that the polyphenolic content decreased above 70 °C may be attributed to the degradation or modification of polyphenols above this temperature (possible covalent interactions with other constituents in the plant cell matrices) (Volf et al. 2014). According to Attya et al. (2010), at temperature 80 °C the concentration of oleuropein was reduced to half after 6 h, whereas it was no longer present after 3 h heating at 230 °C. Regarding the glycerol content impact, a recent study showed similar results, where by increasing the amount of glycerol in the extraction solvent there was an increase in the poyphenolic content up to a maximum glycerol level of 90% (w/v) (Shehata et al. 2015). In the present study, due to the parallel usage of cyclodextrin, glycerol cannot be used in amounts higher that 60% as the extraction solvent mixture becomes very viscous and a certain amount of cyclodextrin becomes non-dissolvable. Overall, it appears that glycerol can be effective as an alternative green solvent for the extraction of polyphenols with improved efficiency than water when methanol or ethanol have to be avoided.
Fig. 1.
Contour plots illustrating the effect of the independent variables examined on the a YTP and b AAR. The upper left, upper right and lower plots show the effect of simultaneous variation of C gl and C CD, T and C CD and T and C gl, respectively
The optimization of CD content in the extraction medium is also crucial as the total amount of ingredients (of varying composition) that can form inclusion complexes with CD and thereby influence positively the extraction process cannot be estimated theoretically. Ligand inclusion in the CD cavity is a stoichiometric phenomenon and molecular inclusion between oleuropein and CD has a stoichiometry of 2:1 (Mourtzinos et al. 2007). On the other hand, other ingredients of the olive leaf extract may compete or promote inclusion complex formation between CD and the olive leaf main bioactives. In the present study, the HP-β-CD was selected in order to study the CD impact, as the β-CD, the most common cyclodextrin used in foods can be dissolved in water up to a limited concentration of 16 mM.
The mathematical models enable the determination of the optimal set of conditions and the maximum predicted YTP and AAR values. Such determination was based on the simultaneous maximization of the desirability function, which provided the optimal values for all process variables considered (Fig. 2). The maximum desirability (0.99) was thus achieved with C CD = 7% (w/v), C gl = 60% (w/v) and T = 60 °C. Under these conditions, the maximum values estimated were YTP = 54.33 mg GAE g−1 dw and AAR = 352.72 μmol TRE g−1 dw. The YTP value is significantly higher than those reported for olive leaf extracts obtained with water/glycerol mixtures without the inclusion of cyclodextrin as a co-solvent (Apostolakis et al. 2014). The addition of cylodextrin in the extraction solvent has a similar effect in the extraction efficiency to that noted by increasing the extraction time for 2 h (Apostolakis et al. 2014).
Fig. 2.
Prediction profiler displaying the overall desirability of the model, following adjustment of the independent variables at their optimal values
The proposed methodology could be described as simultaneous extraction and encapsulation of olive leaf polyphenols. The formation of inclusion complexes between polyphenols and cyclodextrins, known as molecular encapsulation, does provide certain advantages over other conventional solvent-extraction processes, such as increased water solubility, protection against oxidation and protection against decomposition caused by heat or light. The formation of inclusion complexes have been also applied to isolated and individual molecules (Mourtzinos et al. 2007). Overall, the addition of cyclodextrin in the extraction media can lead to increased extraction efficiency, possibly due to inclusion complex formation.
Phytochemical profiling
The polyphenolic composition of olive leaf is affected by many factors as seasoning age, climatic conditions, and genetic factors (Ranalli et al. 2006). Moreover, the extraction conditions (temperature, time, solvent, drying of the leaves, particle size of the material) also affect the polyphenolic content of the final extract. Recently, olive leaf extracts were used in order to study the effect of the polyphenols on human health and especially chronic diseases (Lockyer et al. 2016). A prerequisite to such investigations is the usage of well characterized extracts in terms of polyphenolic composition and may often require profiling the entire bioactive ingredient pool.
In general, cyclodextrins seem to modify the solubility of bioactive ingredients in aqueous solutions leading to increased extractability of biophenols. Moreover, less soluble or even non-polar ingredients can be solubilized in aqueous media. In order to examine the extraction selectivity of the mixed solvent system used, water/glycerol/2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, LC–MS analysis of the extract was also performed. In Fig. 3 the polyphenolic profile of olive leaf extract obtained with 7% w/v CD concentration is given. The LC–MS analysis revealed the existence of at least11 main constituents in the extracts. The compounds that were identified were typical of olive leaf phenolic constituents, including luteolin glucosides, luteolin derivatives, apigenin glucosides, apigenin, rutin and oleuropein (Table 2). Cyclodextrin inclusion into the solvent medium seems to enhance the solubility of the main polyphenols without altering the phenolic profile of a typical olive leaf extract in polar solvents (Apostolakis et al. 2014; Mylonaki et al. 2008).
Fig. 3.
Polyphenolic profile of the extract obtained with 7% w/v CD content, 60% (w/v) glycerol content and temperature at 60 °C. The eluted compounds were monitored at 260 nm
Table 2.
UV-vis and mass spectral characteristics of the main phytochemicals detected in the optimally obtained olive leaf extract
Peak | Rt (min) | λmax (nm) | [M + H]+ | Other ions (m/z) | Compound |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 19.83 | 244, 274, 336 | 611 | 287 [M − 2 glucosyl units + H]+ | Luteolin diglucoside |
2 | 21.10 | 252, 264, 348 | 449 | 287 [M − glucosyl unit + H]+ | Luteolin glucoside |
3 | 23.47 | 254, 356 | 611 | 303 [M − rutinosyl unit + H]+ | Rutin (quercetin 3-O-rutinoside) |
4 | 24.56 | 248, 280 | 541 | 563 [M + Na]+, 361 [M − glucosyl unit + H]+, 137 [hydroxytyrosyl unit]+ | Oleuropein isomer |
5 | 26.08 | 252, 350 | 579 | 433 [M − rhamnosyl unit + H]+, 271 [M − rutinosyl unit + H]+ | Apigenin rutinoside |
6 | 26.63 | 252, 350 | 433 | 271 | Apigenin rhamnoside |
7 | 27.29 | 268, 344 | 449 | 287 [M − glucosyl unit + H]+ | Luteolin glucoside |
8 | 29.94 | 248, 280 | 541 | 563 [M + Na]+, 361 [M − glucosyl unit + H]+, 137 [hydroxytyrosyl unit]+ | Oleuropein |
9 | 30.60 | 268, 344 | 449 | 287 [M − glucosyl unit + H]+ | Luteolin glucoside |
10 | 32.24 | 252, 264, 352 | 625 | 287 | Luteolin derivative |
11 | 36.92 | 254, 264, 352 | 617 | 287 | Luteolin derivative |
Conclusion
A novel approach for more efficient extraction of polyphenols from olive leaves, leading to eco-friendly extracts and processes, is presented in this study. The findings indicate that it is possible to develop convenient extraction techniques of bioactive plant polyphenols with the adoption of green-extraction techniques and thus minimize the use of petrochemicals. Liquid extracts of plant polyphenols, involving aqueous media fortified with eco-friendly compatible co-solvents (e.g. glycerol, cyclodextrins), to further enhance extractability of olive leaf phenolics could become attractive and safe alternative solvents of these compounds to fortify food products or to use as nutritional supplements for enhancement of the antioxidant and antimicrobial potency of a daily diet. However, all these materials (extractants) should be tested for their stability upon storage to maximize their effectiveness when incorporated in a real food matrix.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
References
- Agourram A, Ghirardello D, Rantsiou K, Zeppa G, Belviso S, Romane A, Giordano M. Phenolic content, antioxidant potential, and antimicrobial activities of fruit and vegetable by-product extracts. Int J Food Prop. 2013;16(5):1092–1104. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2011.576446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad-Qasem MH, Cánovas J, Barrajón-Catalán E, Micol V, Cárcel JA, García-Pérez V. Kinetic and compositional study of phenolic extraction from olive leaves (var. Serrana) by using power ultrasound. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2013;17:120–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2012.11.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Apostolakis Α, Grigorakis S, Makris DP. Optimisation and comparative kinetics study of polyphenol extraction from olive leaves (Olea europaea) using heated water/glycerol mixtures. Sep Purif Technol. 2014;128:89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.03.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Attya M, Benabdelkamel H, Perri E, Russo A, Sindona G. Effects of conventional heating on the stability of major olive oil phenolic compounds by tandem mass spectrometry and isotope dilution assay. Molecules. 2010;15:8734–8746. doi: 10.3390/molecules15128734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bassil D, Makris DP, Kefalas P. Oxidation of caffeic acid in the presence of l-cysteine: isolation of 2-S-cysteinylcaffeic acid and evaluation of its antioxidant properties. Food Res Int. 2005;38:395–402. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2004.10.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chemat F, Vian MA, Cravotto G. Green extraction of natural products: concept and principles. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(7):8615–8627. doi: 10.3390/ijms13078615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Đorđević V, Balanč B, Belščak-Cvitanović A, Lević S, Trifković K, Kalušević A, Nedović V. Trends in encapsulation technologies for delivery of food bioactive compounds. Food Eng Rev. 2014;7:452–490. [Google Scholar]
- El-Baroty GS, Khalil MF, Mostafa SHA. Natural antioxidant ingredients from by-products of fruits. Am J Agric Biol Scie. 2014;9(3):311–320. doi: 10.3844/ajabssp.2014.311.320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Karakashov B, Grigorakis S, Loupassaki S, Makris DP. Optimization of polyphenol extraction from Hypericum perforatum (St. John’s Wort) using aqueous glycerol and response surface methodology. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2015;2:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2014.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Karvela E, Makris DP, Karathanos VT. Implementation of response surface methodology to assess the antiradical behaviour in mixtures of ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol with grape (Vitis vinifera) stem extracts. Food Chem. 2012;132:351–359. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kyriakidou K, Mourtzinos I, Biliaderis CG, Makris DP. Optimization of a green extraction/inclusion complex formation process to recover antioxidant polyphenols from oak acorn husks (Quercus Robur) Using Aqueous 2-Hydroxypropyl-b-Cyclodextrin/Glycerol Mixtures. Environments. 2016;3:1–11. doi: 10.3390/environments3010003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Fabiano-Tixiera AS, Tomao V, Cravotto G, Chemat F. Green ultrasound-assisted extraction of carotenoids based on the bio-refinery concept using sunflower oil as an alternative solvent. Ultrason Sonochem. 2013;20:12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lockyer S, Rowland I, Edward Spencer JP, Yaqoob P, Stonehouse W. Impact of phenolic-rich olive leaf extract on blood pressure, plasma lipids and inflammatory markers: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Nutr. 2016 doi: 10.1007/s00394-016-1188-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Makris DP, Boskou G, Andrikopoulos NK. Polyphenolic content and in vitro antioxidant characteristics of wine industry and other agri-food solid waste extracts. J Food Comp Anal. 2007;20:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2006.04.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Martins A, Barros L, Carvalho AM, Santos-Buelga C, Fernandes IP, Barreiro F, Ferreira ICFR. Phenolic extracts of Rubus ulmifolius Schott flowers: characterization, microencapsulation and incorporation into yogurts as nutraceutical sources. Food Funct. 2014;5(6):1091–1100. doi: 10.1039/c3fo60721f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mohammadi A, Jafari SM, Esfanjani AF, Akhavan S. Application of nano-encapsulated olive leaf extract in controlling the oxidative stability of soybean oil. Food Chem. 2016;190:513–519. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mourtzinos I, Salta F, Yannakopoulou K, Chiou A, Karathanos VT. Encapsulation of olive leaf extract in beta-cyclodextrin. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(20):8088–8094. doi: 10.1021/jf0709698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mylonaki S, Kiassos E, Makris DP, Kefalas P. Optimisation of the extraction of olive (Olea europaea) leaf phenolics using water/ethanol-based solvent systems and response surface methodology. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;392:977–985. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-2353-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinho E, Grootveld M, Soares G, Henriques M. Cyclodextrins as encapsulation agents for plant bioactive compounds. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;101:121–135. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinho E, Soares G, Henriques M. Cyclodextrin modulation of gallic acid in vitro antibacterial activity. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem. 2015;81:205–214. doi: 10.1007/s10847-014-0449-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rahmanian N, Jafari SM, Wani TA. Bioactive profile, dehydration, extraction and application of the bioactive components of olive leaves. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2015;42:150–172. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ranalli A, Contento S, Lucera L, Di Febo M, Marchegiani D, Di Fonzo V. Factors affecting the contents of iridoid oleuropein in olive leaves (Olea europaea L.) J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:434–440. doi: 10.1021/jf051647b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodis PS, Karathanos VT, Mantzavinou A. Partitioning of olive leaf antioxidants between oil and water phases. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:596–601. doi: 10.1021/jf010864j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosello-Soto E, Koubaa M, Moubarik A, Lopes RP, Saraiva JA, Boussetta N, Grimi N, Barba FJ. Emerging opportunities for the effective valorization of wastes and by-products generated during olive oil production process: nonconventional methods for the recovery of high-added value compounds. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2015;45:296–310. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2015.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shah MA, Bosco SJD, Mir SA. Plant extracts as natural antioxidants in meat and meat products. Meat Sci. 2014;98(1):21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shehata E, Grigorakis S, Loupassaki S, Makris DP. Extraction optimization using water/glycerol for the efficient recovery of polyphenolic antioxidants from two Artemisia species. Sep Purif Technol. 2015;149:462–469. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.06.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Singh I, Mok M, Christensen AM, Turner AH, Hawley JA. The effects of polyphenols in olive leaves on platelet function. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;18:127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2006.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh B, Sharma HK, Sarkar BC. Optimization of extraction of antioxidants from wheat bran (Triticum spp.) using response surface methodology. J Food Sci Technol. 2012;49:294–308. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0276-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talhaoui N, Gómez-Caravaca AM, León L, De la Rosa R, Segura-Carretero A, Fernández-Gutiérrez A. Determination of phenolic compounds of ‘Sikitita’ olive leaves by HPLC-DAD-TOF-MS. Comparison with its parents ‘Arbequina’ and ‘Picual’ olive leaves. LWT: Food Sci Technol. 2014;58:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.03.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Visioli F, Galli C. The effect of minor constituents of olive oil on cardiovasculardisease: new findings. Nutr Rev. 1998;56:142–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01739.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Volf I, Ignat I, Neamtu M, Popa VI. Thermal stability, antioxidant activity, and photo-oxidation of natural polyphenols. Chem Pap. 2014;68:121–129. doi: 10.2478/s11696-013-0417-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xynos N, Papaefstathiou G, Psychis M, Argyropoulou A, Aligiannis N, Skaltsounis A-L. Development of a green extraction procedure with super/subcritical fluids to produce extracts enriched in oleuropein from olive leaves. J Supercrit Fluids. 2012;67:89–93. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2012.03.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.