Skip to main content
Microbes and Environments logoLink to Microbes and Environments
. 2016 Sep 17;31(4):369–377. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME16087

Diversity of Methane-Oxidizing Bacteria in Soils from “Hot Lands of Medolla” (Italy) Featured by Anomalous High-Temperatures and Biogenic CO2 Emission

Martina Cappelletti 1,*, Daniele Ghezzi 1, Davide Zannoni 1, Bruno Capaccioni 2, Stefano Fedi 1
PMCID: PMC5158108  PMID: 27645100

Abstract

Terre Calde di Medolla” (TCM) (literally, “Hot Lands of Medolla”) refers to a farming area in Italy with anomalously high temperatures and diffuse emissions of biogenic CO2, which has been linked to CH4 oxidation processes from a depth of 0.7 m to the surface. We herein assessed the composition of the total bacterial community and diversity of methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB) in soil samples collected at a depth at which the peak temperature was detected (0.6 m). Cultivation-independent methods were used, such as: i) a clone library analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and pmoA (coding for the α-subunit of the particulate methane monooxygenase) gene, and ii) Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP) fingerprinting. The 16S rRNA gene analysis assessed the predominance of Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Bacillus in TCM samples collected at a depth of 0.6 m along with the presence of methanotrophs (Methylocaldum and Methylobacter) and methylotrophs (Methylobacillus). The phylogenetic analysis of pmoA sequences showed the presence of MOB affiliated with Methylomonas, Methylocystis, Methylococcus, and Methylocaldum in addition to as yet uncultivated and uncharacterized methanotrophs. Jaccard’s analysis of T-RFLP profiles at different ground depths revealed a similar MOB composition in soil samples at depths of 0.6 m and 0.7 m, while this similarity was weaker between these samples and those taken at a depth of 2.5 m, in which the genus Methylocaldum was absent. These results correlate the anomalously high temperatures of the farming area of “Terre Calde di Medolla” with the presence of microbial methane-oxidizing bacteria.

Keywords: methanotrophs, methane-oxidizing bacteria, pmoA gene, Terre Calde di Medolla (“Hot Lands of Medolla”), soil high temperature


Methane (CH4) is the most abundant organic gas in the atmosphere; it represents the second most important green-house after carbon dioxide (CO2) (11, 35) and is strictly involved in carbon cycle processes. Therefore, processes with the ability to consume atmospheric CH4 may play important roles in preventing climate change (21, 28). The origin of CH4 in the atmosphere is related to different anthropogenic (e.g., rice paddies, livestock farms, biomass burning, oil and gas mining, and waste disposal) and natural (e.g., wetlands, termites, oceans, freshwaters, and seepage from deep reservoirs in both sedimentary and volcanic environments) sources (6, 37). The total amount of atmospheric CH4 is 520 Tg year−1, 90% of which is oxidized by photochemical reactions in the troposphere while 10% is removed by microbiological activities (15).

Methanotrophs (also named Methane-Oxidizing Bacteria, MOB) are responsible for most of the biological processes of CH4 oxidation. MOB are a unique group of Gram-negative aerobic bacteria that metabolize CH4 as the only source of carbon and energy (15). They are ubiquitous microorganisms in nature that are able to adapt to different environmental conditions (10). Methane consumption by MOB occurs through an oxidation reaction led by the methane monooxygenase enzyme (MMO), which catalyzes the conversion of methane in methanol (26). This is the first step in the metabolic pathway of methanotrophs, which ends with the production of CO2 (24). Methanotrophs have been classified into two distinct taxonomic groups based on phenotypic and genotypic properties. Type I methanotrophs belong to the γ-subdivision of Proteobacteria, whereas type II methanotrophs belong to the α-subdivision of Proteobacteria (15). Two types of MMO systems have been identified: a soluble cytoplasmic complex (sMMO) and membrane-bound particulate system (pMMO) (18). pMMO genes are universal in MOB, with the possible exception of Methylocella palustris (11). In contrast, sMMO genes are restricted to type II methanotrophs with the exception of certain representatives of two type I genera (27).

The application of molecular biological tools has greatly facilitated the study of methanotroph communities in natural environments. The pmoA gene, which encodes the α-subunit of pMMO, has been widely used as a phylogenetic marker for the identification of methanotrophs through cultivationin-dependent approaches. The pmoA sequence has provided information on the diversity of these organisms in different environments (19, 25).

Terre Calde di Medolla” (TCM) (literally, “Hot Lands of Medolla”) is an ancient toponym that dates back to 1893 (6, 33) and describes a heating surface phenomenon affecting agricultural soils located in the area of Medolla, a small town in the province of Modena (Italy) (Fig. 1A). This phenomenon has a patchy distribution, with a sub-circular shaped area (a few meters in diameter) in which temperatures up to ≅50°C were measured (Fig. 1C and B). The anomalously warm areas are easily recognizable during winter because snow melts within them and during summer when soil heating leads to the death of corn plants (6). Previous studies conducted in 2012 reported a clear correlation between soil heating and gas seepage (CH4 and CO2) (29). As shown in Fig. 2B, the maximum temperature (42.2°C) is reached at a depth of 0.6 m, where horizons with high permeability are present (loamy sandy layer and sandy layer). The CO2/CH4 flux ratio (φCO2/ φCH4) increases from this level to the surface by three orders of magnitude, from values <1 to >1,000 (Fig. 2D). The chemical composition of soil gases together with the gradual increase of 12C in CO2 and decrease in CH4 at shallower depths (from 0.7 m to 0.25 m, Fig. 2A) indicate that the marked increase in the CO2/CH4 flux ratio is due to the biological oxidation of rising CH4, suggesting the occurrence of biological methane oxidation processes in the most aerated layers. Conceptual modeling and numerical simulations have indicated that the exothermic nature of the CH4→CO2 conversion (800 KJ mol−1 of CH4) represents a heat source with the ability to produce the soil thermal anomalies observed in TCM soil (29). This previous finding and thermodynamic prediction prompted us to verify the hypothesized correlation between methanotrophs and soil hot temperatures by examining microbial methanotrophic diversity in TMC soil samples using a cultivation-independent approach. Three soil samples were collected at different ground depths (0.6, 0.7, and 2.5 m). A clone library analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and pmoA gene was performed on 0.6-TCM soil in order to characterize the total bacterial community and define the MOB fraction, respectively. The methanotrophic community composition identified in 0.6-TCM soil was compared to those detected in 0.7- and 2.5-TCM soil by Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP) fingerprinting of the pmoA gene. The results presented here strongly support earlier geophysical models implicating the presence of microbial methane-oxidizing activity in the farming area of “Terre Calde di Medolla” in the anomalous heating of soil.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A) A map of Italy showing the location of Terre Calde di Medolla (“Hot Lands of Medolla”); B) Aerial photo showing the temperature distribution at Terre Calde di Medolla reported as isothermal curves. The location of the sampling site with soil temperatures of 42°C is also indicated; C) Extreme values of soil temperature ≅55°C measured within the area of Terre Calde di Medolla a few months after the seismic sequence that occurred in May–June 2012 in the Emilia region; D) Picture of a thermally anomalous area with clear signs of affected vegetation.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Vertical profiles of temperature and chemical and isotopic compositions of soil gases collected from the surface downwards to a depth of 2.5 m [modified from Capaccioni et al. (6)]. A) Vertical profile of the isotopic composition of CH4 and CO2; 13C/12C-CO2 and 13C/12C-CH4 values are expressed as δ13C-CO2 VPDB (Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite) ‰ and δ13C-CO2 PDB ‰, respectively. B) Vertical profile of temperatures measured with depth using a digital thermometer, C) and D) Vertical profiles of O2/N2 and CO2/CH4 flux ratios measured during piezometer drilling.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

During a field campaign conducted in July 2013, a 2.5-m-deep piezometer was drilled within an area selected on the basis of the presence of an anomalously high surface soil temperature (36.4°C) and significant CO2 fluxes (up to 103.4 g m−2 d−1) (Fig. 2B and D). During drilling, three different soil samples were collected within the sediment corer at depths of 0.6, 0.7, and 2.5 m (hereafter referred to as 0.6-TCM, 0.7-TCM, and 2.5-TCM) and stored within small polystyrene tubes kept at −20°C for later use. During drilling, CO2 and CH4 fluxes were also measured at 0.1-m intervals to a depth of 0.80 m and then at intervals of 0.5 m thereafter.

Extraction of DNA

Genomic DNA was extracted from 0.35 g of 0.6-TCM, 0.7-TCM, and 2.5-TCM soils in duplicate using the Power Soil DNA isolation kit (MOBIO Laboratories, Solana Beach, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with some modifications. Briefly, 0.35 g of each soil sample was incubated in IRS solution supplied with 5 mg mL−1 proteinase K and 8 mg mL−1 lysozyme at 37°C for 30 min. After the addition of 0.1% of SDS, cells were further disrupted by bead beating for three cycles of 1 min each. DNA was eluted in a final volume of 50 μL and stored at −20°C in milli-Q water.

Construction of gene clone libraries and RFLP screening

Isolated genomic DNA was used for PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and/or functional genes (pmoA and mmoX) using the primers listed in Table 1. Bacterial DNA (1 μL of 10× diluted genomic DNA) was added to a 50-μL (final volume) mixture containing 1.25% (v/v) DMSO and 1.25 U Taq polymerase (Thermo Scientific). The following conditions were used to amplify the 16S rRNA gene: at 94°C for 4 min for initial denaturation, 30 cycles (at 94°C for 40 s and 55°C for 40 s for alignment and at 72°C for 40 s for elongation), and at 72°C for 15 min for the final extension step. The pmoA gene was amplified using the following PCR program: at 94°C for 4 min, 30 cycles (at 94°C for 1 min, 56°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min), and a final elongation at 72°C for 20 min. The PCR reactions and cycling conditions used for the amplification of mmoX were as described for pmoA, except for an annealing temperature of 60°C.

Table 1.

Primers used in the present study for PCR amplification and sequencing.

Target gene or scope Primer set Sequence (5′ to 3′) Fragment length Reference
16S rRNA gene 27f
1492r
AGAGTTTGATCHTGGCTCAG 1465 bp (12)
TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT
pmoA A189f
A682r
GGNGACTGGGACTTCTGG 525 bp (18)
GAASGCNGAGAAGAASGC
A189f
mb661r
GGNGACTGGGACTTCTGG 510 bp (9)
CCGGMGCAACGTCYTTACC
mmoX mmoXA
mmoXD
ACCAAGGARCARTTCAAG 790 bp (2)
CCGATCCAGATDCCRCCCCA
mmoX206F
mmoX866R
ATCGCBAARGAATAYGCSCG 719 bp (22)
ACCCANGGCTCGACYTTGAA
Sequencing T7 TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG variable Invitrogen
Sequencing T3 ATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGGA variable Invitrogen

PCR amplification products were confirmed by electrophoresis with a 1% (w/v) agarose gel, purified with the Qiagen PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). PCR products were ligated into the pCRII vector supplied with the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and cloned into Escherichia coli DH5α for clone library construction.

A Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was performed on at least 100 clones from each library. Individual colonies containing inserts of the appropriate size were suspended in 20 μL of TE pH 8 and boiled for 5 min. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and 1-μL portions of the supernatant were used as templates in PCR mixtures to re-amplify the gene inserts that were further used in restriction digestion with tetrameric restriction enzymes. The genes were digested with 5 U of each enzyme at 37°C for 3 h. Restriction profiles were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis with high-resolution agarose (Metaphor, Tebu-bio). Clones were grouped manually based on restriction patterns.

Regarding sequence identification, plasmids (for the 16S rRNA gene) or PCR products (for pmoA) were purified from one representative clone of each group with a Qiagen plasmid purification kit or QIAquick PCR Purification kit (Qiagen). Sequencing was performed by the BMR Genomics Service (Padova, Italy) using T7 and T3 primers (Table 1). Sequences were checked for chimeras using the CHECK_CHIMERA program at the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) (https://rdp.cme.msu.edu/).

Sequence analysis

An analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and pmoA gene sequences obtained from the libraries was performed using the Ribosomal Database Project (8) as well as BLASTn (1) hits against GenBank to generate the best hits. A phylogenetic tree of the derived pmoA gene nucleotide sequences was created using Geneious Tree Builder with the Juke-Cantor genetic distance model and using the neighbor-joining method. One thousand parametric bootstrap replications were simultaneously computed to statistically consolidate the branching topology of the inferred tree.

T-RFLP analysis

A T-RFLP analysis was performed for each sample in triplicate as described previously (7). The same PCR primers and conditions as those described above were used, although the forward primer A189f was labeled at the 5′ end with hexachlorofluorescein dye (Hex).

After purification with Qiaquick spin columns (Qiagen), approximately 200 ng of fluorescently labeled PCR amplification products were digested with 10 U of the restriction enzymes (Roche) MspI and HaeIII. Digestion was performed in a total volume of 20 μL at 37°C for 3 h. The digests obtained were sent to BMR Padova for automated DNA sequencing.

T-RF profile and statistical analyses

The lengths of the labeled fragments were assessed by comparison with an internal standard (ROX-labeled GS500) using Peak Scanner version 1.0 software (Applied Biosystems). A tolerance limit of +/− 2 bp was used for peak assignment on the sizing accuracy of T-RFs ranging from 35/50 to 500 bp. In order to avoid the detection of primers and uncertainties of size determination, terminal fragments smaller than 50 bp were typically excluded from the analysis. In the digestion of HaeIII only, T-RFs ranging from 35 to 50 bp were taken in the analysis because the HaeIII restriction sites included in this size range were expected in pmoA amplicons. A 1% threshold was used to define the baseline. A peak height threshold of 50 fluorescence units was used in the initial analysis of the electropherogram. In order to compare the T-RFLP data obtained from the different soil samples being analyzed, T-RFLP profiles were normalized as previously described by Stralis-Pavese et al. (36).

T-RF peaks were regarded as binary characters and analyzed using NTSYS software as described previously (13) to calculate the distance between soil samples analyzed in terms of T-RFs detected.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The pmoA gene sequences identified in this study have been deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases under accession numbers from KX035110 to KX035129.

Results

Microbial community characterization of soils sampled at a depth of 60 cm by clone library screening

16S rRNA gene sequences

A total of 100 randomly selected non-chimeric rDNA clones containing inserts from the 16S rRNA gene clone library were subjected to RFLP analyses (with the tetrameric restriction enzymes HaeIII, AluI, and RsaI) and placed into groups based on their RFLP patterns. One representative clone for each group was sequenced. A total of 22 bacterial phylotypes were found to be affiliated with 7 distinct phyla through a RDP analysis (Table 2).

Table 2.

Total eubacterial community composition in 0.6-TCM soil on the basis of a 16S rRNA gene clone library analysis.

Phylum Class Order Family Genus Clone librarya Best RDP hitb % IDc
Acidobacteria Acidobacteria unspecified unspecified Gp3 3% JQ712939 96
Gp4 2% AY094624 99
Gp6 6% HQ597776 99
Gp10 6% JQ408035 98

Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Acidimicrobiales Acidimicrobineae Aciditerrimonas 7% LN573416 99

Actinomycetales Intrasporangiaceae Phycicoccus 8% HQ132449 99
Micrococcaceae Arthrobacter 5% KF923442 99
Streptosporangiaceae Microbispora 1% KF886293 96

Gaiellales Gaiellaceae Gaiella 2% KC554071 99

unclassified unclassified unclassified 1% FJ478842 99

Armatimonadetes Chthonomonadetes Chthonomonadales Chthonomonadaceae Chthonomonas 2% GU454980 95

Bacteroidetes Sphingobacteria Sphingobacteriales Chitinophagaceae unclassified 5% GQ487995 99

Chloroflexi Thermomicrobia Sphaerobacterales Sphaerobacteraceae Sphaerobacter 3% KC432559 95

Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus 16% EU221338 99

Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Rhodospirillales Rhodospirillaceae Dongia 3% FJ478641 97
Skermanella 1% KF010774 99
Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas 6% JN178270 99

Betaproteobacteria Burkholderiales Alcaligenaceae Derxia 1% GQ009540 99
Comamonadaceae unclassified 2% EF516785 99

Methylophilales Methylophilaceae Methylobacillus 2% FJ444763 99

Gammaproteobacteria Methylococcales Methylococcaceae Methylobacter 7% AY921679 98
Methylocaldum 3% HM362553 94

unclassified Unclassified unclassified unclassified unclassified 4% JQ088371 87
a

The amount of clones representing each bacterial phylotype within the clone library out of 100 screened clones.

b

The best hit resulting from a comparison of each 16S rRNA gene partial sequence with sequences in the small-subunit rRNA database of the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP).

c

The % of nucleotide identity revealed by a BLAST analysis of the RDP best hit.

Most clones in the clone library and T-RFLP analyses belonged to the phyla Proteobacteria (25%) and Actinobacteria (24%) followed by Acidobacteria (17%) and the genus Bacillus in the phylum Firmicutes (16%) (Table 2). 16S rRNA gene phylotypes associated with the oxidation of CH4 and methanol represented 12% of all clones screened from the library and were all detected within the phylum Proteobacteria. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of two methanotrophs belonged to the genera Methylobacter and Methylocaldum, both of the Gammaproteobacteria class, while one methylotroph belonged to the genus Methylobacillum of the Betaproteobacteria class.

pmoA sequences

A molecular analysis of the pmoA gene was used to characterize the methane-oxidizing microbial community, thereby identifying the most representative strains involved in CH4 consumption.

The genes coding for the α-subunit of both types of methane monooxygenases (particulate and soluble MMO) were targeted in the present study. The pmoA gene encoding the α subunit of the pMMO was successfully amplified with the primer sets, A189f/mb661r and A189f/A682r, while no PCR product was obtained using the primers for the α subunit of the soluble isoform of the methane monooxygenase (mmoXA/mmoXD and mmoX206f/mmoX866r, Table 1) (data not shown). Corresponding to each primer set (amplicon lengths of 510 bp and 525 bp with A189f/mb661r and for A189f/A682r, respectively), two clone libraries were constructed. A total of 200 clones were screened from the two clone libraries through the RFLP analysis using HaeIII and MspI restriction enzymes. Similar to 16S rRNA gene screening, the representative clone of each RFLP group was detected and sequenced in both strands. The pmoA sequences were aligned, analyzed through a BLAST search and grouped (group A–H), if possible, using a threshold of 90% sequence identity (Table S1). Sequences that did not show any affiliation with pmoA sequences were excluded from further analyses.

A distance-based neighbor-joining tree was constructed with the pmoA sequences obtained from the two libraries and their closely related reference sequences obtained from the GenBank database (Fig. 3, Table 3). The phylogenetic analysis of the pmoA sequences revealed the presence of MOB in soil related to the genera Methylocystis (group A), Methylococcus (groups F, D, and E), Methylocaldum (group G), and Methylomonas (group H) (Fig. 3), indicating wide biodiversity in terms of bacteria associated with CH4 consumption. Moreover, two groups of clones (groups B and C in Fig. 3 and Table 3) clustered with the pmoA clones of uncultured or uncharacterized methanotrophs without a defined taxonomic affiliation (uncultured pmoA groups I and II, Fig. 3). In the clone library with A189f/A682r, one clone corresponded to a partial amoA gene that clustered in the phylogenetic analysis with the amoA gene of Nitrosospira sp. (Fig. 3, Table 3). The clone groups C and D, belonging to uncultured methanotrophs and the genus Methylococcus, respectively, were the most dominant in both libraries; however, the percentage of clones belonging to each clone group was different (Table 3). In the A189f/mb661r library, 49% and 18% of clones belonged to groups C and D, respectively, while in the A189f/A682r library, 57% and 23% of clones belonged to groups D and C, respectively. The clones of group B represented 10% of all the clones characterized in the A189f/ A682r library, while the clones of group A as well as those of groups F, G, and H were detected in the A189f/mb661r library only. The latter represented 1%, 17%, and 2%, respectively, of all clones characterized in the A189f/mb661r library. Notably, group G was the third most represented phylotype in the library and was closely related to the genus Methylocaldum. The different results obtained from the screening of the two libraries may be related to the different abilities of the two primer sets (A189f/A682r and A189f/ mb661r) to assess methanotroph diversity in soil (4). In the present study, the A189f/mb661r primer set retrieved the largest diversity of methanotroph pmoA sequences. Therefore, this primer set was used in T-RFLP analyses. As shown in Table 3 and Fig. 4 (0.6-m HaeIII and 0.6-m MspI), the pmoA-based T-RFLP profiles obtained from 0.6-TCM soil correlated with the results of clone library screening. Additionally, the minor T-RFs that were not affiliated with any pmoA sequence from the libraries may represent new methanotrophic species. Among these, the T-RFs not corresponding to any expected digestion fragments with a relative area greater than 1% were 65, 78, 93, 144, and 210 bp in the HaeIII digestion, and 63 and 75 bp in the MspI digestion (0.6-m HaeIII and 0.6-m MspI in Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree of partial pmoA and amoA nucleotide sequences retrieved from an analysis of A189f/A682r and A189f/mb661r clone libraries from 0.6-TCM soil. pmoA clones are grouped into eight groups (A–H) based on at least 90% nucleotide sequence identity. GenBank accession numbers are shown for sequences of cultured methanotrophs and clones from other studies. The bar indicates 10% sequence divergence. Bootstrap values are given and based on 500 data resampling. Boxes marked by dashed lines show the phylogenetic affiliations of the pmoA clones from 0.6-TCM soil.

Table 3.

Analysis of representative pmoA clones obtained from the amplification of a 0.6-TCM soil extract with two primer sets (A189f/mb661r and A189f/A682r).

Group Clone Library with A189f/mb661ra Library with A189f/A682ra Best Blast hit % ID T-RFLP expected T-RFLP observed
A MD-51 1% Uncultured methanotrophic bacterium clone 16 (pmoA) 100% M244, H45 M242, H45
MD-92 1% Uncultured bacterium clone ZW200 (pmoA) 98%

B MD-53b 6% Uncultured bacterium clone CH_118 (pmoA) 93% M279, H225 M279, H226
MD-58b 4% Uncultured bacterium clone CH_118 (pmoA) 93%

C MD-2 6% Uncultured bacterium clone JXL48 (pmoA) 94% M208, H225 M208, H226
MD-5 32% Uncultured bacterium clone JXL48 (pmoA) 94%
MD-32 10% Uncultured bacterium clone JXL48 (pmoA) 95%
MD-42 1% Uncultured bacterium clone JXL48 (pmoA) 94%
MD-8b 15% Uncultured bacterium clone JXL48 (pmoA) 94%
MD-105b 8% Uncultured bacterium clone JXL48 (pmoA) 95%

D MD-1 17% Uncultured methanotroph pmoA-61 (pmoA) 91% M33, (H19)b M35, (H19)b, H82c
MD-9 1% Uncultured bacterium RB18 (pmoA) 90%
MD-103b 57% Uncultured methanotroph pmoA-61 (pmoA) 91%

E MD-14 10% Uncultured Methylococcus sp. clone Xh_pmoA_CA51 (pmoA) 93% M36, (H19)b M37, (H19)b, H82c
MD-57b 5% Uncultured Methylococcus sp. clone Xh_pmoA_CA51 (pmoA) 93%
MD-5b 3% Uncultured Methylococcus sp. clone Xh_pmoA_CA51 (pmoA) 93%

F MD-47 1% Uncultured methanotrophic bacterium clone 37 (pmoA) 94% M79, H85 M76, H82

G MD-3 17% Uncultured bacterium clone JXL16 (pmoA) 99% M79, H100 M76, H99

H MD-11 2% Uncultured Methylomonas sp. clone 13RH2Omb16 (pmoA) 99% (M505)b, H348 H350

- MD-41 1% Uncultured bacterium clone AOB-A0-21 (amoA) 97% M46, H45 H45
a

The % of clones representing each clone group within the 100 clones screened.

b

Expected T-RFLP peaks outside of the valid T-RF range are between brackets (on the basis of the DNA fragment length standard [Rox 500]).

c

Second cut.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparison of representative T-RFLP patterns of pmoA products amplified from DNA extracted from different ground depths of TCM (0.6-, 0.7- and 2.5-TCM soil). The lengths of significant T-RFs (signal intensity greater than the threshold of 1%) are reported. See Table 3 for the assignment of T-RFs to methanotrophic species/clones revealed from clone library screening. Putative peaks representing partial digestion are depicted by asterisks.

T-RFLP analysis to compare MOB at different ground depths (soils sampled at 0.6, 0.7, and 2.5 m)

A T-RFLP analysis of the amplified pmoA gene was used to elucidate differences and similarities between sediments sampled at different ground depths (0.6, 0.7, and 2.5 m) in TCM.

On the basis of the presence or absence of terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs) in the profiles shown in Fig. 4, an analysis of Jaccard’s distance (JD) was performed in order to compare the MOB communities present in soil collected at different depths (Table S1). A similarity index of 1.0 indicated that communities have strong similarities. Jaccard’s index (Sj) between 0.6- and 0.7-TCM soil was 0.905, demonstrating stability in the microbial composition of the two soil samples. A lower degree of similarity in the MOB community composition was revealed between 0.6-TCM/0.7-TCM soil and 2.5-TCM soil (JD of 0.6–0.7) (Table S1).

T-RFs corresponding to the clone group G (99 bp T-RF with HaeIII, 76 bp T-RF with MspI) were present in the T-RFLP profiles generated from 0.6-TCM and 0.7-TCM soil, while their abundance was below the detection limit in 2.5-TCM soil. The presence of the group G pmoA clone in 0.6-TCM and 0.7-TCM soil that correlated to the genus Methylocaldum may be associated with the higher temperatures at these ground depths (Fig. 1 and 5). Further differences were observed in the presence of unaffiliated T-RFs. The 2.5-m T-RFLP analysis did not show HaeIII T-RFs 78 and 93 bp or MspI T-RF 76 bp, which were present in the 0.6-TCM and 0.7-TCM profiles. The differences between 0.6-TCM and 0.7-TCM included HaeIII T-RF 210 bp and T-RFs associated with the secondary restriction sites of the pmoA sequences (MspI T-RF 373 and HaeIII T-RF 351).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Visual representation of the vertical variability of sedimentological features (from the surface downwards to a depth of 2.5 m) associated with the corresponding profiles of temperature, the CO2/CH4 flux ratio, and T-RFLP patterns (HaeIII-based digestion) representing methanotrophic diversity in soil collected at depths of 0.6, 0.7, and 2.5 m. The T-RF corresponding to the genus Methylocaldum is highlighted in samples from depths of 0.6 and 0.7 m.

Discussion

The area known as TCM in the Po river valley (Italy) has been attracting interest since 1893 (6, 29, 33) due to its unusual ground temperatures that reach up to 50°C at a depth of 0.6 m, which exceed local average values. This phenomenon is associated with diffuse CH4 and biogenic CO2 seepage (6), and conceptual modeling linked to numerical simulations have suggested that the exothermic nature of the CH4→CO2 conversion (800 KJ mol−1 of CH4) represents a heat source with the ability to produce the thermal anomalies observed in TCM soil (29). Indirect support for this hypothesis is provided by an early study on permafrost, which quantified the specific heat released by methanotrophy to be in the order of 50 MJ (kgCH4)−1 (23).

The 16S rRNA gene clone library analysis of 0.6-TCM soil (this work) indicates the predominance of bacteria belonging to the phyla Proteobacteria (with representatives of the three classes Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria), Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria (17). Among Proteobacteria, two methanotrophic genera belonged to Gammaproteobacteria, while one methylotrophic genus in the library belonged to Betaproteobacteria. A total of 12% of the clones of the 16S rRNA gene library, constructed with the universal 27f/1492r primer set, are representative of methanotrophs and/or methylotrophs, suggesting the occurrence of methane-oxidizing activities in high-temperature soil, i.e. 0.6-TCM soil.

An examination of the pmoA clone libraries of 0.6-TCM soil revealed the large biodiversity of methanotrophs including various MOB affiliated to Methylomonas, Methylococcus, Methylocystis, and Methylocaldum. In the A189f/mb661r pmoA library, most clones (≅50%) were found within group C, which represents uncultivated methanotrophic bacteria related to methanotrophs isolated from upland grassland soil consuming atmospheric CH4 and a saline alkaline environment (21, 34). In the A189f/A682r library of 0.6-TCM soil, most clones (57%) were found within group D, which shared a maximum of 90% nucleotide similarity with the uncultivated methanotrophic bacteria identified in paddy fields cultivated with rice over a long period of time (16). The relative abundance of the two groups in the two clone libraries may be associated with the different specificities of the two primer sets used to amplify the molecular marker gene pmoA. In particular, the primer pair (A189f/mb661r) was able to detect a larger set of pmoA sequences and did not amplify any amoA from the 0.6-TCM extract. This is in line with previous findings showing the superior ability of A189f/mb661r over A189f/A689r to detect a larger part of methanotrophic bacteria and its higher specificity to amplify pmoA (4, 9, 31). Therefore, this primer set was used in the T-RFLP analysis of pmoA in 0.6-TCM soil. T-RFs corresponding to all the groups detected in the clone libraries were found in T-RFLP fingerprinting. Although the genus Methylobacter was detected in the 16S rRNA gene clone library, but not in the pmoA clone library, MspI and HaeIII T-RFs (505 and 350 bp, respectively) were found in T-RFLPs, which may correspond to Methylobacter pmoA digestion fragments on the basis of the MspI T-RFLP analysis reported by Horz et al. (20) and also the in silico HaeIII digestion of representatives of this gene present in the database (e.g. the pmoA gene with GenBank ID EU124862 and JQ038155).

It is important to note that the T-RFLP analysis of the pmoA gene demonstrated that the vertical distribution of MOB (at depths of 0.6, 0.7, and 2.5 m) is relatively stable in TMC soil, independently of differences in oxygen availability, as has been reported in studies on sediments from Lake Constance (CH) (30, 32). In TCM soil, CO2 production linked to CH4 consumption was detected at a depth of 0.7 m to the surface, indicating that methanotrophic activity occurs at shallow depths at which O2 is present, whereas MOB activity is absent at a depth of 2.5 m at which CH4 is present and O2 is absent. The main difference observed with depth was the presence of MOB belonging to group G (Fig. 3, 4 and 5). T-RFLP comparisons highlighted the presence of T-RFs (in the HaeIII- and MspI-based profiles) corresponding to Methylocaldum-affiliated bacteria in soil collected at depths of 0.6 and 0.7 m. These T-RFs were below the detectable limit in 2.5-TCM soil (Fig. 4 and 5). In 0.6-TCM soil, the presence of the genus Methylocaldum was detected by analyzing both the gene markers, the pmoA and 16S rRNA genes. In particular, the pmoA sequence of the clone group G was phylogenetically correlated with Methylocaldum gracile (nt identity 99%). Bacteria belonging to the genus Methylocaldum are widely distributed in nature (3). Their habitats are thermal springs, activated sludge, arable soils, silage waste, and manure (14, 38). Methylocaldum gracile grows at 20°C and Methylocaldum tepidum at 30°C, with both growing optimally at 42°C and at a maximal temperature of 47°C (5). The presence of detectable Methylocaldum-related T-RFs at ground depths of 0.6 and 0.7 m may be related to an optimal growth temperature (42°C) present in this soil layer along with advantageous oxygen concentrations and other undefined favorable environmental conditions occurring at depths of 0.7 and 0.6 m, but not at 2.5 m. Additional T-RFs, not related to any clones in the pmoA library, distinguished 0.6-TCM soil from 2.5-TCM soil; however, the contribution of these putative MOB species has not yet been elucidated. The optimal conditions for the CH4 conversion are present at depths of approximately about 0.7–0.6 m, at which a significant increase in temperature was detected and bacteria affiliated with the genus Methylocaldum were identified. Chemical and isotopic data together with the presence of MOB appear to indicate that this process may even occur at depths >0.6 m. However, at deeper levels, the lack of free oxygen does not appear to allow efficient and complete CH4→CO2 conversion. This is also spatially associated to the absence of significant warming phenomena and not detectability of Methylocaldum-affiliated bacteria.

In conclusion, the results of the present study support and emphasize previous findings by Capaccioni et al. (6) and Nespoli et al. (29) in which strong biological methane-oxidizing activity in TMC soil was proposed to be related to the anomalous temperatures detected at a depth of 0.6 m. Accordingly, the spatial associations between the anomalously high temperatures in TCM soil, the consumption of CH4 and O2, the production of biogenic CO2 at shallow levels, and the detection of MOB all agree with the occurrence of microbial CH4→CO2 conversion and soil heating. Although the phenomenon described here occurs in a local farming area in Italy, the importance of our work lies in the relationship we found between methanotrophy and soil heating, a topic that deserves public interest for its implications in climate warming and methane release.

Supplementary Information

31_369_s1.pdf (332.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by “Vasco e GC Rossi—Microbial Biofilm” grant (2012–2015) and by the University of Bologna (RFO grant). The authors thank Dr Stefano Cremonini for his practical support in sample collection from the area of Terre Calde di Medolla, Modena Italy. This paper is in memory of the deceased Prof. Bruno Capaccioni, a dedicated and determined scientist, a clever and passionate man. We feel privileged to have worked with him.

References

  • 1.Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schaeffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Auman A.J., Stolyar S., Costello A.M., Lidstrom M.E. Molecular characterization of methanotrophic isolates from freshwater lake sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:5259–5266. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.12.5259-5266.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bodrossy L., Holmes E.M., Holmes A.J., Kovács K.L., Murrell J.C. Analysis of 16S rRNA and methane monooxygenase gene sequences reveals a novel group of thermotolerant and thermophilic methanotrophs, Methylocaldum gen. nov. Arch Microbiol. 1997;168:493–503. doi: 10.1007/s002030050527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bourne D.G., McDonald I.R., Murrell J.C. Comparison of pmoA PCR primer sets as tools for investigating methanotroph diversity in three Danish soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:3802–3809. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.9.3802-3809.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bowman J.P. The methanotrophs—the families Methylococcaceae and Methylocystaceae. In: Dworkin M., Falkow S., Rosenberg E., Schleifer K.H., Stackebrandt E., editors. The Prokaryotes. Vol. 5. Springer; New York: 2006. pp. 266–289. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Capaccioni B., Tassi F., Cremonini S. Ground heating and methane oxidation processes at shallow depth in Terre Calde di Medolla (Italy): Observations and conceptual model. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2015;120:3048–3064. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Capodicasa S., Fedi S., Porcelli A.M., Zannoni D. The microbial community dwelling on a biodeteriorated 16th century painting. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2010;64:727–733. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cole J.R., Wang Q., Cardenas E., et al. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D141–D145. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Costello A.M., Lidstrom M.E. Molecular characterization of functional and phylogenetic genes from natural populations of methanotrophs in lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:5066–5074. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.11.5066-5074.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dalton H. The Leeuwenhoek Lecture 2000: The natural and unnatural history of methane-oxidizing bacteria. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2005;360:1207–1222. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dedysh S.N., Liesack W., Khmelenina V.N., Suzina N.E., Trotsenko Y.A., Semrau J.D., Bares A.M., Panikov N.S., Tiedje J.M. Methylocella palustris gen. nov., sp. nov., a new methane-oxidizing acidophilic bacterium from peat bogs, representing a novel subtype of serine-pathway methanotrophs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:955–969. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-3-955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.DeLong E.F. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5685–5689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Frascari D., Cappelletti M., Fedi S., Zannoni D., Nocentini M., Pinelli D. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane aerobic cometabolic biodegradation in slurry and soil-free bioreactors: A kinetic study. Biochem Eng J. 2010;52:55–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gagliano A.L., Tagliavia M., D’Alessandro W., Franzetti A., Parello F., Quatrini P. So close, so different: geothermal flux shapes divergent soil microbial communities at neighbouring sites. Geobiol. 2016;14:150–162. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hanson R.S., Hanson T.E. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:439–471. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.2.439-471.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ho A., Lüke C., Cao Z., Frenzel P. Ageing well: methane oxidation and methane oxidizing bacteria along a chronosequence of 2000 years. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2011;3:738–743. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00292.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ho A., De Roy K., Thas O., De Neve J., Hoefman S., Vandamme P., Heylen K., Boon N. The more, the merrier: heterotroph richness stimulates methanotrophic activity. ISME J. 2014;8:1945–1948. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Holmes A.J., Costello A., Lidstrom M.E., Murrell J.C. Evidence that particulate methane monooxygenase and ammonia monooxygenase may be evolutionary related. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;132:203–208. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(95)00311-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Holmes A.J., Roslev P., McDonald I.R., Iverson N., Hendriksen K., Murrell J.C. Characterization of methanotrophic bacterial populations in soils showing atmospheric methane uptake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:3312–3318. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.8.3312-3318.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Horz H.P., Yimga M.T., Liesack W. Detection of methanotroph diversity on roots of submerged rice plants by molecular retrieval of pmoA, mmoX, mxaF, and 16S rRNA and ribosomal DNA, including pmoA-based terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:4177–4185. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4177-4185.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Horz H.P., Rich V., Avrahami S., Bohannan B.J.M. Methane-oxidizing bacteria in a California upland grassland soil: diversity and response to simulated global change. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:2642–2652. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2642-2652.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hutchens E., Radajewski S., Dumont M.G., McDonald I.R., Murrell J.C. Analysis of methanotrophic bacteria in Movile Cave by stable isotope probing. Environ Microbiol. 2004;6:111–120. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00543.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Khvorostyanov D.V., Krinner G., Ciais P., Heimann M., Zimov S.A. Vulnerability of permafrost carbon to global warming. Part I: model description and role of heat generated by organic matter decomposition. Tellus B. 2008;60:250–264. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lieberman R.L., Rosenzweig A.C. Biological methane oxidation: regulation, biochemistry, and active site structure of particulate methane monooxygenase. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;39:147–164. doi: 10.1080/10409230490475507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McDonald I.R., Murrell J.C. The particulate methane monooxygenase gene pmoA and its use as a functional gene probe for methanotrophs. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;156:205–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb12728.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McDonald I.R., Bodrossy L., Chen Y., Murrell J.C. Molecular ecology techniques for the study of aerobic methanotrophs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:1305–1315. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02233-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Murrell J.C., McDonald I.R., Gilbert B. Regulation of expression of methane monooxygenases by copper ions. Trends Microbiol. 2000;8:221–225. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01739-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nazaries L., Murrell J.C., Millard P., Baggs L., Singh B.K. Methane, microbes and models: fundamental understanding of the soil methane cycle for future predictions. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:2395–2417. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nespoli M., Todesco M., Capaccioni B., Cremonini S. Ground heating and methane oxidation processes at shallow depth in Terre Calde di Medolla (Italy): Numerical modeling. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2015;120:3065–3076. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pester M., Friedrich M.W., Schink B., Brune A. pmoA- based analysis of methanotrophs in littoral lake sediment reveals a diverse and stable community in a dynamic environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:3138–3142. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.5.3138-3142.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rahalkar M., Schink B. Comparison of aerobic methanotrophic communities in littoral and profundal sediments of Lake Constance by a molecular approach. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:4389–4394. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02602-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rothfuss F., Bender M., Conrad T. Survival and activity of bacteria in deep, aged lake sediments (Lake Constance) Microbiol Ecol. 1997;33:69–77. doi: 10.1007/s002489900009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sciarra A., Cantucci B., Buttinelli M., Galli G., Nazzari M., Pizzino L., Quatrocchi F. Soil-gas survey of liquefaction and collapsed caves during the Emilia seismic sequence. Ann Geophys. 2012;55:803–809. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Serrano-Silva N., Valenzuela-Encinas C., Marsch R., Dendooven L., Alcántara-Hernández R.J. Changes in methane oxidation activity and methanotrophic community composition in saline alkaline soils. Extremophiles. 2014;18:561–571. doi: 10.1007/s00792-014-0641-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Solomon S., Daniel J.S., Sanford T.J., Murphy D.M., Plattner G.-K., Knutti R., Friedlingstein P. Persistence of climate changes due to a range of greenhouse gases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:18354–18359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006282107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stralis-Pavese N., Bodrossy L., Reichenauer T.G. 16S rRNA based T-RFLP analysis of methane oxidising bacteria—Assessment, critical evaluation of methodology performance and application for landfill site cover soils. Appl Soil Ecol. 2006;31:251–266. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tassi F., Bonini M., Montegrossi G., Capecchiacci F., Capaccioni B., Vaselli O. Origin of light hydrocarbons in gases from mud volcanoes and CH4-rich emissions. Chem Geol. 2012;294–295:113–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Trotsenko Y.A., Medvedkova K.A., Khmelenina V.N., Eshinimayev B.T. Thermophilic and thermotolerant aerobic methanotrophs. Microbiol. 2009;78:387–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

31_369_s1.pdf (332.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Microbes and Environments are provided here courtesy of Nakanishi Printing

RESOURCES