Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Dec 15;4(6):e01406-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01406-16

Complete Genome Sequence of Rhodococcus sp. Strain WMMA185, a Marine Sponge-Associated Bacterium

Navid Adnani a, Doug R Braun a, Bradon R McDonald b, Marc G Chevrette b,c, Cameron R Currie b, Tim S Bugni a,
PMCID: PMC5159585  PMID: 27979952

Abstract

The Rhodococcus strain WMMA185 was isolated from the marine sponge Chondrilla nucula as part of ongoing drug discovery efforts. Analysis of the 4.44-Mb genome provides information regarding interspecies interactions as pertains to regulation of secondary metabolism and natural product biosynthetic potentials.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Drug resistance is now commonplace for microbial human pathogens and approaches to discovering new antibiotics, indeed, completely new antibacterial chemotypes, continue to be developed to counter this problem (1). Accordingly, the number of natural products (as possible drug leads) available for screening, their producers and their production conditions must necessarily increase. In support of this tenet, the production of natural products by one producing organism in the presence of another organism has garnered tremendous interest (26). Such co-culturing of microorganisms has proven extremely effective for coaxing microbes into making natural products that would not otherwise be produced. This approach to new natural product generation underscores the importance of having genomic information available for co-cultured organisms (6). Importantly, the structural diversity of natural products enabled by co-culturing stems, in large part, from the diversity of co-cultured organisms.

The genus Rhodococcus is a Gram-positive bacterium within the subgroup actinobacteria whose members are commonly associated with bioremediation and biocatalytic processes (79); steroids, nitriles, lignins, and organosulfur agents are but a few compound classes degraded by rhodococci (10). Additionally, although rare, select Rhodococcus spp. are human pathogens; pathogenicity has been associated with similarities to Mycobacterium spp. (11, 12).

Genome analyses of the few reported Rhodococcus spp. highlight tremendous biosynthetic potential despite a scarcity of isolated secondary metabolites (13). Recently, cocultures of Rhodococcus spp. with other actinobacteria, including Streptomyces spp. (14, 15) and Micromonosporaceae (2) have been shown to produce otherwise undetectable secondary metabolites. In particular, marine invertebrate-associated Rhodococcus sp. WMMA185 induced biosynthesis in other marine actinobacteria via interspecies interactions; the precise nature of these interactions awaits further investigation. Using genomic data from WMMA185, mechanisms of biosynthetic regulation and interspecies communication may be deciphered in an effort to access unexploited (or cryptic) biosynthetic potentials from actinobacteria or, for that matter, WMMA185 itself.

Rhodococcus sp. strain WMMA185 was isolated in 2011 from a marine sponge Chondrilla nucula collected off the coast of the Florida Keys. WMMA185 was isolated from a plate prepared using R2A medium supplemented with 50% artificial seawater (ASW).

The complete genome of Rhodococcus sp. WMMA185 was sequenced at the Duke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology (GCB) using PacBio RS II (Pacific Biosciences) technology. Reads were assembled using the HGAP assembler (16) into a single contig. Open reading frames were predicted by Prodigal (17) and annotated using HMMer models for the TIGRfam (18), KEGG (19, 20), and PFAM (21, 22) databases. The genome was found to be 4.44 Mb in length and has 64.08% G+C, and 90.39% coding density. The organism’s secondary metabolic content/potential was assessed using anti-SMASH (23, 24), PRISM (25), and custom pipelines. Among other cluster types, a total of two type I polyketide (PKS), eight nonribosomal peptide (NRPS), and two terpene biosynthetic gene clusters were identified within the WMMA185 genome.

Accession number(s).

The complete genome sequence of Rhodococcus sp. strain WMMA185 has been deposited at the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the sequence GenBank accession no. CP017014.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01-GM104192 and U19 A1109673.

Footnotes

Citation Adnani N, Braun DR, McDonald BR, Chevrette MG, Currie CR, Bugni TS. 2016. Complete genome sequence of Rhodococcus sp. strain WMMA185, a marine sponge-associated bacterium. Genome Announc 4(6):e01406-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01406-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adnani N, Vazquez-Rivera E, Adibhatla SN, Ellis GA, Braun DR, Bugni TS. 2015. Investigation of interspecies interactions within marine Micromonosporaceae using an improved co-culture approach. Mar Drugs 13:6082–6098. doi: 10.3390/md13106082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bertrand S, Bohni N, Schnee S, Schumpp O, Gindro K, Wolfender JL. 2014. Metabolite induction via microorganism co-culture: A potential way to enhance chemical diversity for drug discovery. Biotechnol Adv 32:1180–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Netzker T, Fischer J, Weber J, Mattern DJ, König CC, Valiante V, Schroeckh V, Brakhage AA. 2015. Microbial communication leading to the activation of silent fungal secondary metabolite gene clusters. Front Microbiol 6:299. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Demain AL. 2014. Importance of microbial natural products and the need to revitalize their discovery. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 41:185–201. doi: 10.1007/s10295-013-1325-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pettit RK. 2009. Mixed fermentation for natural product drug discovery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 83:19–25. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-1916-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Larkin MJ, Kulakov LA, Allen CCR. 2005. Biodegradation and Rhodococcus—masters of catabolic versatility. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16:282–290. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Larkin MJ, Kulakov LA, Allen CCR. 2006. Biodegradation by members of the genus Rhodococcus: biochemistry, physiology, and genetic adaptation. Adv Appl Microbiol 59:1–29. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2164(06)59001-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Carvalho CCCR, Costa SS, Fernandes P, Couto I, Viveiros M. 2014. Membrane transport systems and the biodegradation potential and pathogenicity of genus Rhodococcus. Front Physiol 5:133. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yam KC, Okamoto S, Roberts JN, Eltis LD. 2011. Adventures in Rhodococcus—from steroids to explosives. Can J Microbiol 57:155–168. doi: 10.1139/W10-115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang X, Coulson GB, Miranda-CasoLuengo AA, Miranda-CasoLuengo R, Hondalus MK, Meijer WG. 2014. IcgA is a virulence factor of Rhodococcus equi That modulates intracellular growth. Infect Immun 82:1793–1800. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01670-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Letek M, González P, MacArthur I, Rodríguez H, Freeman TC, Valero-Rello A, Blanco M, Buckley T, Cherevach I, Fahey R, Hapeshi A, Holdstock J, Leadon D, Navas J, Ocampo A, Quail MA, Sanders M, Scortti MM, Prescott JF, Fogarty U, Meijer WG, Parkhill J, Bentley SD, Vázquez-Boland JA. 2010. The genome of a pathogenic Rhodococcus: cooptive virulence underpinned by key gene acquisitions. PLoS Genet 6:e1001145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kulakov LA, Larkin MJ. 2002. Genomic organization of rhodococcus in genomics of GC-rich Gram-positive bacteria, pp 15–46. Danchin A. (ed), Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kurosawa K, Ghiviriga I, Sambandan TG, Lessard PA, Barbara JE, Rha C, Sinskey AJ. 2008. Rhodostreptomycins, antibiotics biosynthesized following horizontal gene transfer from Streptomyces padanus to Rhodococcus fascians. J Am Chem Soc 130:1126–1127. doi: 10.1021/ja077821p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Onaka H, Mori Y, Igarashi Y, Furumai T. 2011. Mycolic acid-containing bacteria induce natural-product biosynthesis in streptomyces species. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:400–406. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01337-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ge F, Wang LS, Kim J. 2005. The cobweb of life revealed by genome-scale estimates of horizontal gene transfer. PLoS Biol 3:e316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Haft DH, Selengut JD, Richter RA, Harkins D, Basu MK, Beck E. 2013. TIGRFAMs and genome properties in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D387–D395. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. 2014. Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D199–D205. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. 2016. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D457–D462. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Heger A, Hetherington K, Holm L, Mistry J, Sonnhammer ELL, Tate J, Punta M. 2014. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D222–D230. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL, Potter SC, Punta M, Qureshi M, Sangrador-Vegas A, Salazar GA, Tate J, Bateman A. 2016. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D279–D285. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Medema MH, Blin K, Cimermancic P, de Jager V, Zakrzewski P, Fischbach MA, Weber T, Takano E, Breitling R. 2011. antiSMASH: rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W339–W346. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Weber T, Blin K, Duddela S, Krug D, Kim HU, Bruccoleri R, Lee SY, Fischbach MA, Müller R, Wohlleben W, Breitling R, Takano E, Medema MH. 2015. antiSMASH 3.0-a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W237–W243. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Skinnider MA, Dejong CA, Rees PN, Johnston CW, Li H, Webster ALH, Wyatt MA, Magarvey NA. 2015. Genomes to natural products PRediction informatics for secondary metabolomes (PRISM). Nucleic Acids Res 43:9645–9662. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES