Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2004 Sep;42(9):4332–4334. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.9.4332-4334.2004

Multicenter Validation of the cppB Gene as a PCR Target for Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

S M Bruisten 1,*, G T Noordhoek 2, A J C van den Brule 3, B Duim 4, C H E Boel 3, K El-Faouzi 1, R du Maine 4, S Mulder 2, D Luijt 5, J Schirm 5
PMCID: PMC516305  PMID: 15365038

Abstract

The cppB gene is often used as a target for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by PCR. Using a coded panel of 500 DNA samples, we determined that the cppB gene is missing in 5.8% of N. gonorrhoeae strains, and therefore we consider the cppB gene to be an unsuitable target.


The laboratory diagnosis of gonorrhea depends on identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urogenital samples. Amplification using the Roche COBAS AMPLICOR (CA) assay has been found highly suitable for screening asymptomatic subjects as well as diagnosing gonorrhea in populations with a high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) (4, 6). Specimens containing other species of the Neisseriaceae, probably members of the normal pharyngeal flora, but also non-Neisseria bacterial strains, were reported to produce false-positive results in the CA PCR test, which targets the cytosine DNA methyltransferase gene (4, 8, 12).

Confirmatory tests using the 16S rRNA genes and the cppB gene have been reported (2, 5, 13, 14); however, the cryptic plasmid on which the cppB gene is located is suspected to be missing in some clinical isolates (11). Therefore, we determined the frequency of the cppB gene in well-characterized N. gonorrhoeae strains cultured from STI patients by using real-time PCR technologies as developed in different diagnostic laboratories in The Netherlands (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Real-time PCR systems used for analysis

Laboratory Target gene Chemistry of probes Primers and probes (reference)a Hardware (company)
GG&GD cppB TaqMan HO1, HO2, CppBNB (4) RotorGene (Corbett Research)
SLGD cppB TaqMan cppB2-1, B2-2, cppB-pr ABI 7700 (Applied Biosystems)
SLGD 16S rRNA TaqMan 16S-f1, 16S-r2, GO-207T ABI 7700 (Applied Biosystems)
PAMM 16S rRNA FRET SL67, 16S-Rev, FL+LC LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics)
LVF cppB FRET Ngon3, -4, -5FL, -6LC LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics)
AMC cppB FRET Ngon3, -4, -5FL, -6LC LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics)
a

Sequences and PCR conditions are as published and available on request from each laboratory.

From September 2002 to April 2003, patients with complaints indicative of gonorrhea visited the STI clinic in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, where clinical and epidemiological data were registered and samples were taken. Urethral, cervical, rectal, or tonsil specimens were used to inoculate GC-Lect agar plates (Becton Dickinson) at the Gemeentelijke Geneeskundige en Gezondheidsdienst (GG&GD). Culture conditions and biochemical determination of N. gonorrhoeae were as described previously (1), including Gram staining, positive catalase reaction, cytochrome c oxidase, and sugar metabolism tests. DNA was isolated from a few colonies by isopropanol precipitation, and the pellet was dissolved in 50 μl of T10 buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) (9). In the context of a communal epidemiology study, we typed these N. gonorrhoeae strains by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the opa and por genes, confirming further that true N. gonorrhoeae strains were used for DNA isolation (7, 10). A coded panel of 500 samples was composed by distributing 50 negative samples randomly among 450 DNA preparations of confirmed N. gonorrhoeae strains. The N. gonorrhoeae-positive samples were prepared by dilution of the original DNA solution to ensure an easily detectable target load. The 50 negative controls consisted of 26 samples containing different buffers, namely, 10× T10 buffer, 5× H2O, 5× phosphate-buffered saline, and 6× AMPLICOR resuspension buffer; 20 samples containing bacterial DNAs derived from non-Neisseria species; and 4 DNA samples from the nongonococcal species N. meningitidis, N. mucosa, N. lactamica, and N. subflava. For each diluted DNA and control sample, five aliquots of 200 μl were prepared and distributed to the participating laboratories by regular mail at room temperature. The samples were analyzed by real-time PCR tests targeting the cppB or the 16S rRNA genes by use of an input of 5 μl of the DNA solution, along with primers, probes, and hardware as outlined in Table 1. The Academisch Medisch Centrum (AMC) performed discrepancy analysis (see below).

After submission of all test results that were obtained in a blinded fashion to the GG&GD, the codes were broken and reported back to the participating laboratories. Each laboratory reset the values for cycle threshold (CT) (for the ABI and RotorGene hardware) and crossing point (Cp) (for the LightCycler), with the results of the negative control samples taken into account. Initially, 459 of 500 (91.8%) results were fully concordant and consisted of 48 negative and 411 N. gonorrhoeae-positive samples. The 41 samples with discordant test results plus 7 negative controls were tested by the AMC to establish whether a sample was truly lacking the cppB gene. If both 16S rRNA tests were positive for a sample but at least three of the four cppB tests were negative, this was taken as proof that the cppB target was lacking.

Two N. gonorrhoeae DNA samples proved to be negative in all tests, probably because they were diluted excessively and were counted as negatives in addition to the 50 negative samples. The SLGD reported two false-positive 16S rRNA test results for the N. meningitidis and N. lactamica samples, yielding 96% specificity. However, when the two samples were retested in the CA test at the Streeklaboratorium voor de Volksgezondheid in Groningen en Drenthe (SLGD), they proved to be negative. Laboratorium voor Pathologie en Medische Microbiologie (PAMM) also reported low Cp values (less than 30) in the 16S rRNA test for these strains, suggesting positivity, but melting-curve analysis with fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) probes showed that these samples were not N. gonorrhoeae. The specificity was 100% for all other tests. The number of discrepant N. gonorrhoeae samples was thus reduced from 41 to 37 (41 minus 2 minus 2) for the six tests (Table 2). For 11 of these 37 samples, a negative result was reported by the 16S rRNA assays and/or by one or two cppB assays, suggesting either a low DNA load or a false-negative result. Thus, for these 11 samples, two to four cppB tests were positive, indicating the presence of a cppB gene. In contrast, in the other 26 N. gonorrhoeae samples, the 16S rRNA assays were positive at both laboratories. In 3 of these 26, only one positive cppB gene result was reported with CT values just below the cutoff, and in the other 23, all four cppB gene tests were negative. These 26 samples were thus discovered to be cppB-lacking N. gonorrhoeae strains, resulting in a proportion of 5.8% (26 of 448) of the N. gonorrhoeae strains tested.

TABLE 2.

Samples with discrepant test results (n = 37)

No. of strains in panel No. of tests positive
cppB gene interpretationc
16S rRNA targeta cppB gene targetb
3 2 3 Yes
1 2 2 Yes
3 1 4 Yes
3 1 3 Yes
1 1 2 Yes
23 2 0 No
3 2 1 No
a

The PAMM and SLGD laboratories produced 16S rRNA test results (n = 2).

b

The SLGD, GG&GD, LVF, and AMC laboratories produced cppB gene test results (n = 4).

c

The cutoff Cp or Ct values were as follows: for the PAMM laboratory, 38; for SLGD, 35 (both tests); for GG&GD, 37; for LVF, 33; for AMC, 40. In case of FRET technologies (see Table 1), a melting curve was also used for specificity. Yes, positive for cppB gene; No, negative for cppB gene. There were totals of 11 results positive and 26 results negative for the cppB gene.

The clinical sensitivities were 98.9 and 99.6% for the 16S rRNA targets at the SLGD and PAMM laboratories, respectively. For the cppB assays, the sensitivities without correction for identifying strains lacking the cppB gene were 92.4, 93.7, and 93.9% at the GG&GD, Laboratorium voor de Volksgezondheid in Friesland (LVF), and SLGD laboratories, respectively, and are thus obviously affected by the lack of a cppB gene in 5.8% of the strains. In a recent CA PCR study in The Netherlands performed directly with clinical samples, a similar proportion of 6% of N. gonorrhoeae strains lacking cppB was found (D. S. Luijt, P. A. J. Bos, A. A. van Zwet, P. C. van Voorst Vader, and J. Schirm, submitted for publication). The present study quantified for the first time the frequency of the cppB gene in a well-defined group of N. gonorrhoeae strains. This gene was found on the cryptic plasmid but may also be present chromosomally in the N. gonorrhoeae genome in cases where the plasmid is integrated. The cryptic plasmid was found to be missing in 4% of N. gonorrhoeae strains collected 25 years ago in the United States and Europe (11) and appeared to be correlated to the PA°U auxotype (3, 8).

Since the sensitivity of a PCR test targeting the cppB gene can never surpass 94%, we conclude that either assays targeting 16S rRNA or alternative PCR assays for detection of N. gonorrhoeae that targets, for example, the highly specific opa genes need to be evaluated in future studies.

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Koek and M. Dierdorp for preparation and characterization of all N. gonorrhoeae DNA samples and M. Kolader and colleagues for including the STI patients.

Partial financial support was supplied by Roche Diagnostics, Almere, The Netherlands.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Buimer, M., G. J. J. van Doornum, S. Ching, P. G. H. Peerbooms, P. K. Plier, D. Ram, and H. H. Lee. 1996. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction-based assays with clinical specimens from various sites: implications for diagnostic testing and screening. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2395-2400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Diemert, D. J., M. D. Libman, and P. Lebel. 2002. Confirmation by 16S rRNA PCR of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in a low-prevalence population. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4056-4059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dillon, J. R., and M. Pauzé. 1981. Relationship between plasmid content and auxotype in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates. Infect. Immun. 33:625-628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Farrell, D. J. 1999. Evaluation of AMPLICOR Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR using cppB nested PCR and 16S rRNA PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:386-390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ho, B. S., W. G. Feng, B. K. Wong, and S. I. Egglestone. 1992. Polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in clinical samples. J. Clin. Pathol. 45:439-442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Martin, D. H., C. Cammarata, B. Van Der Pol, R. B. Jones, T. C. Quinn, C. A. Gaydos, K. Crotchfelt, J. Schachter, J. Moncada, D. Jungkind, B. Turner, and C. Peyton. 2000. Multicenter evaluation of AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3544-3549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.O'Rourke, M., C. A. Ison, A. M. Renton, and B. G. Spratt. 1995. Opa-typing: a high-resolution tool for studying the epidemiology of gonorrhoea. Mol. Microbiol. 17:865-875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Palmer, H. M., H. Mallinson, R. L. Wood, and A. J. Herring. 2003. Evaluation of the specificities of five DNA amplification methods for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:835-837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peerbooms, P. G. H., M. N. Engelen, D. A. J. Stokman, B. H. B. van Benthem, M.-L. van Weert, S. M. Bruisten, A. van Belkum, and R. A. Coutinho. 2002. Nasopharyngeal carriage of potential bacterial pathogens related to day care attendance, with special reference to the molecular epidemiology of Haemophilus influenzae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2832-2836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rahman, M., A. Alam, K. Nessa, S. Nahar, D. K. Dutta, L. Yasmin, S. Monira, Z. Sultan, S. A. Khan, and M. J. Albert. 2001. Treatment failure with the use of ciprofloxacin for gonorrhea correlates with the prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains in Bangladesh. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15. 32:884-889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roberts, M., P. Piot, and S. Falkow. 1979. The ecology of gonococcal plasmids. J. Gen. Microbiol. 114:491-494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.van Doornum, G. J. J., L. M. Schouls, A. Pijl, I. Cairo, M. Buimer, and S. Bruisten. 2001. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:829-835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Van Dyck, E., H. Smet, L. Van Damme, and M. Laga. 2001. Evaluation of the Roche Neisseria gonorrhoeae 16S rRNA PCR for confirmation of AMPLICOR PCR-positive samples and comparison of its diagnostic performance according to storage conditions and preparation of endocervical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2280-2282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Whiley, D. M., M. E. Crisante, M. W. Syrmis, I. M. Mackay, and T. P. Sloots. 2003. Detection of Neisseria meningitidis by LightCycler PCR. Pathology 35:347-349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES