ABSTRACT
Nonenzymatic roles for HIV-1 integrase (IN) at steps prior to the enzymatic integration step have been reported. To obtain structural and functional insights into the nonenzymatic roles of IN, we performed genetic analyses of HIV-1 IN, focusing on a highly conserved Tyr15 in the N-terminal domain (NTD), which has previously been shown to regulate an equilibrium state between two NTD dimer conformations. Replacement of Tyr15 with alanine, histidine, or tryptophan prevented HIV-1 infection and caused severe impairment of reverse transcription without apparent defects in reverse transcriptase (RT) or in capsid disassembly kinetics after entry into cells. Cross-link analyses of recombinant IN proteins demonstrated that lethal mutations of Tyr15 severely impaired IN structure for assembly. Notably, replacement of Tyr15 with phenylalanine was tolerated for all IN functions, demonstrating that a benzene ring of the aromatic side chain is a key moiety for IN assembly and functions. Additional mutagenic analyses based on previously proposed tetramer models for IN assembly suggested a key role of Tyr15 in facilitating the hydrophobic interaction among IN subunits, together with other proximal residues within the subunit interface. A rescue experiment with a mutated HIV-1 with RT and IN deleted (ΔRT ΔIN) and IN and RT supplied in trans revealed that the nonenzymatic IN function might be exerted through the IN precursor conjugated with RT (RT-IN). Importantly, the lethal mutations of Tyr15 significantly reduced the RT-IN function and assembly. Taken together, Tyr15 seems to play a key role in facilitating the proper assembly of IN and RT on viral RNA through the RT-IN precursor form.
IMPORTANCE Inhibitors of the IN enzymatic strand transfer function (INSTI) have been applied in combination antiretroviral therapies to treat HIV-1-infected patients. Recently, allosteric IN inhibitors (ALLINIs) that interact with HIV-1 IN residues, the locations of which are distinct from the catalytic sites targeted by INSTI, have been discovered. Importantly, ALLINIs affect the nonenzymatic role(s) of HIV-1 IN, providing a rationale for the development of next-generation IN inhibitors with a mechanism that is distinct from that of INSTI. Here, we demonstrate that Tyr15 in the HIV-1 IN NTD plays a critical role during IN assembly by facilitating the hydrophobic interaction of the NTD with the other domains of IN. Importantly, we found that the functional assembly of IN through its fusion form with RT is critical for IN to exert its nonenzymatic function. Our results provide a novel mechanistic insight into the nonenzymatic function of HIV-1 IN and its prevention.
KEYWORDS: HIV-1, integrase, reverse transcriptase, viral ribonucleoprotein complex
INTRODUCTION
Integrase (IN) is a retroviral enzyme, the main catalytic function of which is to integrate double-stranded viral DNA (vDNA) copies into host chromosomes (1). The inhibitors that interact with the IN catalytic site and inhibit the IN enzymatic function of vDNA strand transfer (INSTI) have been developed and approved for use in treating HIV-1-infected patients (2). Although the potential anti-HIV-1 efficacy of INSTIs has been demonstrated, INSTI-resistant mutants have emerged in patients treated with these drugs (3), reinforcing the importance of developing novel inhibitors that act on IN or other viral constituents through different mechanisms.
In addition to its main enzymatic function, accumulating evidence has suggested that HIV-1 IN might have additional nonenzymatic roles at steps prior to viral integration (4–6). Previous studies from our group and others have demonstrated that amino acid substitutions of the conserved residues within IN result in a lethal effect on HIV-1 that is accompanied with a severe reduction in vDNA synthesis (7–9). Further genetic analyses of HIV-1 IN have revealed possible roles for IN in uncoating (10), reverse transcription (11–16), and nuclear import of the viral genome (17–19).
To distinguish them from the mutations that specifically affect the IN catalytic activity, which are known as class I IN mutations, the mutations that affect other steps during HIV-1 infection are called class II IN mutations (20). Because the class II IN mutations are lethal to HIV-1 and have a more profound inhibitory impact than the class I mutations (7), the nonenzymatic functions of IN might serve as an attractive target for the development of novel IN inhibitors (4–6). Compounds that interact with IN and inhibit HIV-1 replication at steps other than integration, known as allosteric IN inhibitors (ALLINIs), have been reported (21, 22). Subsequent studies have demonstrated that ALLINIs induce an abnormal virus particle maturation accompanied with an eccentric condensation of the virus contents and abortive vDNA synthesis (23–25) and nuclear import of HIV-1 (24). More recently, cryo-electron tomography analysis elegantly demonstrated that ALLINIs impair the proper packaging of the viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) complex outside the capsid core and the subsequent virus particle maturation (26). These studies suggest a critical role for IN during vRNP assembly, which might be essential for initiating early replication events, including reverse transcription, providing a rationale for the development of a next-generation IN inhibitor that targets the nonenzymatic role(s) of HIV-1 IN with a mechanism distinct from that of INSTI.
HIV-1 IN consists of three functional domains: the N-terminal domain (NTD), which has a highly conserved HHCC motif; the catalytic core domain (CCD), which has a DDE catalytic motif; and the C-terminal domain (CTD), which possesses a nonspecific DNA binding activity (27). Structure analyses have revealed that each HIV-1 IN domain (28–30) and the two domains composing the NTD-CCD (31) or the CCD-CTD (32) assemble into either a dimer or a tetramer form. Recently, the entire structures of other retroviral INs in a complex with their cognate viral DNA ends, referred to as intasomes, have been successfully resolved (33–35). These structure analyses of intasomes revealed the unprecedented assembly of INs into a tetramer form for the prototype foamy virus (33) and octamer forms for the Rous sarcoma virus (34) and mouse mammary tumor virus (35), providing new insights into the enzymatic role for IN during retroviral DNA integration and the inhibitory results of INSTI (36).
In contrast to its enzymatic function, the structural basis for the nonenzymatic role of IN remains largely unknown. Lead ALLINI compounds have been identified by designing small compounds to inhibit the interaction between IN and the cellular factor, lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF)/p75 (37). The ALLINIs interact with residues within the CCD of HIV-1 IN, which is located at a site distinct from the DDE catalytic sites (5). Similar to the impact of the ALLINIs, amino acid substitutions introduced at conserved residues in the NTD (7, 38, 39) and CTD (40) of HIV-1 IN disrupt the nonenzymatic functions of IN, providing rationales for using the NTD and CTD of HIV-1 IN as alternative targets to develop a novel class of ALLINI.
A nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis of an isolated fragment consisting of HIV-1 IN residues 1 to 55 showed that the NTD dimer exists in two conformational states, E and D forms (30). The two dimer forms differ in the coordination of the zinc ion by two histidines and two cysteines in the HHCC motif. Our previous NMR study demonstrated that the NTD fragment with a replacement of the highly conserved tyrosine at position of 15 (Tyr15) to an alanine (Y15A) folds correctly but takes only the E form (41). The side chain containing Tyr15 in the D form is exposed to the solvent more than that in the E form (30), and in the crystal structure of the NTD-CCD, Tyr15 is located at the dimer-dimer interface to assemble the IN subunits into a tetramer form (31). A subsequent study revealed that the Y15A mutation abolished IN enzymatic activities (42). These structural and functional aspects suggest a critical role for Tyr15 in forming the high-ordered assembly of HIV-1 IN required not only for its enzymatic functions but also for its nonenzymatic roles. These results promoted us to further analyze Tyr15 to delineate its contribution to the nonenzymatic roles of HIV-1 IN in the context of a virus replication cycle.
Here, we performed genetic analyses of HIV-1 IN, focusing on the Tyr15 conserved in the NTD, by introducing amino acid substitutions with several different residues. Our results demonstrate that a benzene ring in the side chain containing Tyr15 is a critical moiety for the nonenzymatic role of HIV-1 IN, providing a structural role in IN assembly through its hydrophobic interactions with residues in other domains. Additionally, we found that this critical role for Tyr15 might be exerted through a precursor form in which IN is conjugated with reverse transcriptase. These findings provide a novel insight into the nonenzymatic function of HIV-1 IN.
RESULTS
Nonenzymatic role of Tyr15 at the NTD of HIV-1 IN.
The Tyr15 residue is located within the NTD of IN (Fig. 1A). Using a total of 3,920 HIV-1/SIVcpz (simian immunodeficiency virus of chimpanzees) sequences from the HIV Sequence Database (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/HIV/mainpage.html), Shannon entropy scores (43, 44) representing variations at individual amino acid positions from 1 to 50 of the NTD were calculated. The Shannon entropy score for the Tyr15 residue is 0.018, which is as low as the scores (0.014 to 0.024) for the HHCC residues (Fig. 1B). This analysis demonstrated that the Tyr15 is highly conserved among HIV-1 subtypes and related SIVcpz strains. Similarly, the residue corresponding to the Tyr15 in HIV-2/SIVsmm (SIV of sooty mangabeys) strains was also highly conserved (Shannon entropy score of 0.14). In the NTD dimer, the Tyr15 side chain is exposed to the solvent (30) (Fig. 1C), and it was previously shown to be critical for maintaining an equilibrium state between two NTD dimer conformations (41). To investigate an NTD functional role through Tyr15, we generated HIV-1 IN mutant clones by introducing several amino acid substitutions at Tyr15, and we evaluated the impacts of these substitutions in the context of virus replication. An HIV-1 mutant lacking IN expression was previously shown to produce viral particles with abnormal morphology and reduced viral DNA (vDNA) synthesis after infection (8, 26). We generated a similar HIV-1 mutant lacking IN expression (ΔIN) by introducing two ochre stop codons at the IN initiation site in the pol gene. Additionally, to serve as a class I IN mutation control, the D116G mutant, in which one of the DDE catalytic sites was mutated to specifically abolish IN enzymatic activity (7), was also examined in parallel.
The infectivity of each HIV-1 mutant was determined in single-round infection assays by monitoring the levels of the luciferase marker gene expression after infection (7). Replacement of Tyr15 with alanine (Y15A) severely reduced virus infectivity to less than 0.1% of the parental HIV-1 clone (Fig. 2A). Importantly, as observed for the ΔIN mutation, the Y15A mutation reduced both the early and late vDNA products to 2 to 10% of the parental HIV-1 pseudotype virus (wild-type [WT]) levels (Fig. 2B and C), demonstrating its major impairment at or prior to reverse transcription. Meanwhile, the D116G mutant generated both early and late vDNA products at comparable levels to the WT (Fig. 2B and C) but had a significantly lower level of the integrated form, at less than 1% of the WT level (Fig. 2D). The substitutions of Tyr15 with histidine (Y15H) or tryptophan (Y15W) also impaired HIV-1 infectivity (Fig. 2A) and was accompanied by a severe reduction in vDNA synthesis (Fig. 2B and C). Notably, the HIV-1 mutant with the Try15-to-phenylalanine substitution (Y15F) retained virus infectivity (Fig. 2A) with efficient vDNA synthesis and integration (Fig. 2B to E). Interestingly, the Y15W mutant showed significantly higher infectivity than the Y15A mutant (P < 0.001). In addition, the Y15W mutant showed significantly higher integration activity than other lethal mutants (Fig. 2D), suggesting that the Y15W mutant might retain the IN enzymatic function. To support this notion, an in vitro integration assay showed that the Y15A and Y15H mutations severely abrogated integration activity, while the Y15F and Y15W mutations retained the enzymatic activity (Fig. 2E). Taken together with the previous in vitro study findings, which clearly demonstrated that the Y15A mutation abolished IN enzymatic activities in vitro (42), our results demonstrate that a benzene ring in the aromatic side chain, such as Tyr15 and Phe15, is a prerequisite moiety for both the nonenzymatic and enzymatic functions of HIV-1 IN.
Impact of the Tyr15 mutations on viral particle constituents and morphology.
To delineate the underlying mechanism for the disruption of the nonenzymatic IN role(s) by Tyr15 mutations, we examined the viral particle constituents produced by each mutant clone. The results of Western blot analyses of viral particle fractions demonstrated that all of the Tyr15 mutants, as well as the ΔIN mutant, produced viruses containing the fully processed capsid protein (p24) with traces of its precursor products, p41 and p51, all of which were indistinguishable from those produced by the WT and D116G clones (Fig. 3A, left). None of the Tyr15 mutations affected the level of reverse transcriptase (RT) subunits p66 and p51 (Fig. 3A, middle). However, the ΔIN mutant clone produced a smaller amount of the p51 subunit than the WT clone, suggesting that the presence of IN in the Pol precursor might be critical for its proper processing to generate a mature RT heterodimer (p66/p51). The anti-RT antibody also detected a slower-migrating band with an apparent molecular mass of ∼98 kDa (p98), the size of which is compatible with the expected sum of RT (p66) and IN (p32). Furthermore, p98 (Fig. 3A, RT-IN) was detected by an anti-IN antibody (Fig. 3A, right) and completely absent in the ΔIN mutant particle, suggesting that p98 might correspond to an uncleaved precursor protein of RT and IN (RT-IN). Notably, RT-IN was detected in all of the Tyr15 mutants at the same level as in both WT and D116G. Taken together, none of the Tyr15 mutations affected the proper processing of the Gag and Pol precursor proteins within virus particles, at least from a quantitative aspect. We detected similar levels of vRNA in all of the mutant virus particle fractions containing equivalent amounts of capsid protein, which were comparable with the level in the WT particle fraction (data not shown). Thus, none of the IN mutations significantly affected the vRNA incorporation into virus particles. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis revealed that the Y15A and ΔIN mutants predominantly produced immature virions characterized by doughnut-shaped ring-form particles (Fig. 3B). The mature particle characterized by a spherical core was hardly detected in either of the IN mutants. These results suggested that lethal mutation on Tyr15, similar to the ΔIN mutation, might affect proper virus particle generation. However, due to the low frequency of the mature particle in our pseudotype preparation of the IN intact control (Fig. 3B, WT), the impact of IN mutations on matured particle formation can hardly be evaluated statistically.
Impact of the Tyr15 mutations on the functional aspects of viral constituents.
Our assessment of viral constituents failed to detect any apparent defect caused by the Tyr15 mutations. In addition, all of the IN mutants possessed endogenous RT activities (7, 45) in the virion-disrupted fractions, comparable with those in the WT (Fig. 4A). Thus, all of the Tyr15 mutants produced virus particles that possessed the essential constituents, enzymatically active RT and genomic vRNA, to initiate reverse transcription.
Together with our other results, the experiment described above shows that the impact of Tyr15 on vDNA synthesis is only detected through a cell-based infection assay. Therefore, we reasoned that the step(s) prior to reverse transcription, such as the uncoating step (10) through the proper disassembly of the capsid core complex, might be affected by Tyr15 mutations. We next addressed the fate of the virus capsid protein (CA) complex shortly after entry into cells by performing in situ capsid uncoating assays (46, 47). Briefly, HeLa cells were spinoculated with fluorescently labeled WT and mutant viruses containing Vpr fused with green fluorescent protein (GFP-Vpr) and S15-dTomato for 2 h. At various times after spinoculation, the total number of complexes that entered and fused into the cytoplasm (Vpr-GFP-positive spots lacking S15-dTomato) was counted (representative images are shown in Fig. 4B, upper images). The number of the complexes that contained CA (coated) was compared with the number of complexes lacking CA staining (uncoated). The data are graphed at each time point as the percentage of the coated particles in the total fused GFP+ particles. Both the Y15A and D116G mutants showed similar CA disassembly kinetics compared with those of the WT control (Fig. 4B, lower graph). In our assay, a slight acceleration of capsid disassembly was noticed for the Y15A mutant at 4 h postinoculation, but this acceleration did not reach statistical significance. Although a possible contribution of IN for proper uncoating (10) cannot be ruled out, we failed to detect a significant impact of these IN mutations on the kinetics of HIV-1 CA disassembly, at least under our assay conditions. The possible contribution of IN to efficient vDNA synthesis in vivo, therefore, might be independent from the proper disassembly of the CA complex shortly after viral entry into cells.
Biochemical properties of the Tyr15 mutant IN.
The assembly of IN subunits into functional multimers plays a key role for the enzymatic function of IN (6). A crystal structure analysis of the NTD-CCD of HIV-1 IN led to a proposed model for an IN tetramer through the association of two IN dimers (31). Based on the tetramer model, Tyr15 is located in the dimer-dimer interface that is formed through the interaction of the NTD in one subunit with the CCD in the other subunit (Fig. 5A and 6A). The intersubunit NTD-CCD interactions are maintained in the final energy-minimized structure model on the basis of the recent prototype foamy virus (PFV) IN X-ray crystal structure analyses (36). A previous report clearly demonstrated that the Y15A mutation abolished the IN enzymatic activities in vitro accompanied by severe reductions of IN dimer and multimer formations (42). We next examined the effect of the Tyr15 mutations on the IN multimer formation. Recombinant proteins of full-length HIV-1 IN (rIN) containing the Tyr15 mutations were prepared and subjected to cross-linking analyses. The IN dimer and other high-order forms likely corresponding to IN trimer and tetramer forms were detected for rIN with the wild-type control (Fig. 5B and C). The Y15F mutation slightly reduced but retained the multimer formation. In contrast, rINs carrying the lethal mutations at Tyr15 (Y15A, Y15H, and Y15W) produced much lower levels of the IN dimer form (Fig. 5B and D). For other high-ordered forms of IN, reduction was also evident in the Y15A and Y15H mutants (Fig. 5D). These results suggest that a benzene ring of the aromatic side chain, like Tyr15 or Phe15, is a key moiety for IN assembly through the functional dimer formation to exert the nonenzymatic and enzymatic functions. The in vitro integration assay showed that the Y15W mutant retained the enzymatic activity (Fig. 2E), suggesting that the aromatic side chain of Tyr15 might have a role in maintaining the IN high-ordered structure required for the enzymatic function.
Based on the tetramer models proposed for HIV-1 IN (31, 36, 42), we generated additional IN mutants by introducing alanine substitutions at the residues located around the Tyr15 within the NTD-CTD interface among the IN subunits (Fig. 6A). The importance of these residues for virus infectivity has been previously reported for Lys14 (48) in the NTD and Trp131 (49, 50), Trp132 (50), Phe185 (51, 52), and Lys186 (11, 53) in the CCD. Here, in addition to these previously evaluated residues, Glu11, Asp25, Phe181, Ile182, Arg187, and Lys188 were analyzed. Severe reductions in virus infectivities (Fig. 6B) and vDNA levels (Fig. 6C) were observed for all of these IN mutants, to various degrees. Among these IN mutations, W131A and W132A had the most prominent impact on vDNA synthesis after infection. Within the NTD-CTD interface, the hydrophobic interactions through Trp131/Trp132 might contribute to the assembly of functional IN subunits. As reported in the previous model of the HIV-1 intasome (36, 42), the intersubunit NTD-CCD interactions might involve salt bridges of Glu11-Lys186 and Asp25-Lys188 and hydrogen bonds between the side chains of CCD residues Gln164 and Arg187 with the backbones of NTD residues Lys14 and Tyr15. In addition to these salt bridges and hydrogen bonds, our results support the importance of Tyr15, along with the proximal residues within the NTD and CCD, in the nonenzymatic role of HIV-1 IN. Importantly, the intersubunit NTD-CCD interaction proposed for the enzymatic role of HIV-1 IN (42) may overlap, at least in part, with the structure required for its nonenzymatic function.
Rescue of HIV-1 IN functions by supplying RT and IN in trans.
Retrovirus IN is originally expressed as a Gag-Pol fusion precursor protein, after which it is processed into a mature form by viral protease within virus particles (54). We noticed that, in addition to the fully processed form, a certain level of IN exists in the RT-IN conjugated precursor form in the virus particle (Fig. 3A). We next addressed the possible contribution of each IN form to the nonenzymatic role of IN by conducting a trans-complementation analysis using RT and IN-defective HIV-1 through the vpr-mediated protein delivery system (51, 55). For this experiment, an HIV-1 mutant lacking RT-IN expression (ΔRT ΔIN) was generated by the combined transfection of three different expression vectors, each of which supplied the Vpr, Vpr-RT, Vpr-IN, or Vpr-RT-IN proteins (Fig. 7A). To estimate the rescue efficacy of the HIV-1 ΔRT ΔIN mutant, the levels of vDNA synthesis (Fig. 7B) and viral gene (luc) expression (Fig. 7C) were determined after infection. The levels of vDNA and viral gene expression following the expression of the Vpr-RT-IN were over 10-fold higher than that following the expression of Vpr-RT and Vpr-IN separately (P < 0.001). Moreover, the vDNA synthesis and viral gene expression of the ΔRT ΔIN mutant were hardly recovered by the Vpr-RT-IN carrying a Y15A, Y15H, or Y15W mutation. The rescue of vDNA by the Y15F mutant was less efficient than with D116G or the WT control. Since the Y15F mutation was tolerable when evaluated in the HIV-1 infection assay (Fig. 2), in which IN was originally expressed in a gag-pol form, this reduction might be due to an unknown artificial effect of the Y15F mutation when IN was expressed in fusion form with vpr-RT. Nonetheless, statistical analysis showed that Vpr-RT-IN-Y15F possesses a significant rescue activity compared with Vpr-RT-IN-Y15A in both cDNA synthesis and viral gene expression (P < 0.001). In addition, viral gene expression following the expression of Vpr-RT-IN-Y15F was significantly higher than that following the expression of Vpr-RT-IN-D116G (Fig. 7C) (P < 0.001). Thus, the Vpr-RT-IN carrying the tolerant mutation of Y15F efficiently recovered the vDNA synthesis and viral gene expression of the ΔRT ΔIN mutant. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the nonenzymatic roles of HIV-1 IN might be exerted through the RT-IN fusion form.
Impact of Tyr15 mutations on the assembly of RT-IN.
Finally, we examined the impact of the Tyr15 lethal mutations on IN assembly in the RT-IN fusion form. To address this point, the Vpr-RT-IN fusion protein was expressed in HEK293T cells, and the cellular fraction was subjected to a cross-link analysis in the presence of synthetic HIV RNA (56). After cross-linking, we detected slow-migrating bands corresponding to dimers and higher-order assemblages of Vpr-RT-IN (Fig. 8). The assembly of RT-IN was reproduced for the Vpr-RT-IN carrying the D116G or Y15F mutation. In contrast, the Vpr-RT-IN carrying the lethal mutations of Tyr15 (Y15A, Y15H, and Y15W) resulted predominantly in dimers, with minimal levels of higher-ordered assembly forms. These results suggest that Tyr15 might be involved in forming the higher-ordered assemblages of RT-IN and that RT might be responsible for the dimer formation of RT-IN. Although the specific contribution of vRNA to form the higher-ordered assembly of Vpr-RT-IN remains to be determined, the Tyr15 in the HIV-1 IN NTD might play a critical structural role during the assembly of RT and IN with vRNA through the RT-IN fusion form.
DISCUSSION
Here, we have provided novel insights into the structural and functional roles of the Tyr15 in the HIV-1 IN NTD for exertion of the nonenzymatic IN function through the precursor RT-IN form. Importantly, a benzene ring in the side chain of Tyr15 was shown to be a key moiety for the correct assembly of IN and RT-IN that might be prerequisite for the proper course of vRNP complex formation within virus particles and the subsequent vDNA synthesis after entry into cells.
Structural insight into the nonenzymatic function of IN.
Several mutations at conserved amino acids within the NTD of HIV-1 IN are lethal to HIV-1 infectivity and result in virus particle abnormalities and defects in vDNA synthesis (7, 38, 39). In previous NMR analyses of these lethal mutations, we found that the NTD fragment with a Y15A mutation folds correctly but only forms a single conformation (41). Here, in the context of the HIV-1 infection cycle, we showed that the Y15A mutation abrogated virus infectivity with severe impairment of vDNA synthesis. Thus, a subtle conformational effect on the NTD by the Y15A mutation had a great impact on HIV-1 infection at the steps before reverse transcription. Importantly, the side chain containing Tyr15 is exposed to the solvent in an NTD dimer (30) (Fig. 1C). Together with previous circumstantial evidence, our current results suggest that the NTD plays a structural role in the nonenzymatic function of HIV-1 IN that might be exerted through the intersubunit interaction of the Tyr15 with other domains of IN. Indeed, the results of our in vitro cross-linking experiments of full-length rIN proteins demonstrated that the lethal mutations Y15A, Y15H, and Y15W significantly reduced IN dimer formation, while the Y15F mutation had less impact. These results suggest that the hydrophobic nature with a benzene ring in the side chain at the Tyr15 position is necessary for functional IN multimer conformations to exert the nonenzymatic function of HIV-1 IN.
Based on the tetramer models proposed for the NTD-CCD of HIV-1 IN (31, 36, 42), the Tyr15 is located at the dimer-dimer interface formed by two subunits of the dimer. In addition to Tyr15, our genetic analyses revealed that other residues located at the dimer-dimer interface are also critical for the nonenzymatic function of HIV-1 IN (Fig. 6). Judging from their hydrophobic nature and expected positions, Trp131, Trp132, and Phe181 might be critical for forming a hydrophobic interaction with Tyr15, although the correct positions of the Trp131 and Phe185 in the tetramer model were not clear, because these were replaced with Lys and Asp to increase the solubility the NTD-CCD fragment for its crystallization. Meanwhile, previous genetic analyses of HIV-I IN have shown that there are several critical residues within the CTD (40), mutations of which result in the class II phenotype. Based on these combined findings, we believe that the CTD, which is missing in the NTD-CCD model, might contribute to stabilizing the IN dimer and subsequent higher-ordered assembly.
Implication for vRNP assembly.
vDNAs play a key role in intasome assembly, which is required for HIV-1 IN to exert its enzymatic function (33–35). In line with this finding, vRNA might play a critical role in vRNP complex assembly. A recent report demonstrated that IN is an essential component for forming functional HIV-1 vRNP complexes (26). In agreement with this idea, our genetic analysis of Tyr15 suggests that HIV-1 IN plays a critical role in the proper assembly of the vRNP complex, which might be a prerequisite for reverse transcription in vivo. The physiological interaction of HIV-1 IN with RT through the IN CTD has been reported (15), and a subsequent study demonstrated that IN has a direct impact on RT processivity in vitro (13). Recently, a genetic study of HIV-1 IN found that altering the RT-binding surface on the IN CTD disrupted both reverse transcription and viral replication (16), demonstrating the biological significance of the HIV-1 RT and IN interaction in vivo. The possible role of HIV-1 IN NTD, through interaction with the CTD, therefore might also contribute the nonenzymatic function of HIV-1 IN. Although the exact structure required for the IN nonenzymatic function is largely unknown, our trans-complement experiments revealed that IN might exert a structural role through its precursor form with RT. Importantly, the uncleaved form of RT-IN was detected in all of the Tyr15 mutants at the same levels as in the WT, indicating that the Y15A mutation might hinder the subsequent steps toward the appropriate vRNP formation through the RT-IN. Within virus particles, fully processed IN exists as a major form. Previous studies have shown a significant rescue of particle morphology defects of ΔIN HIV-1 (26), vDNA synthesis and infectivity of ΔRT ΔIN HIV-1 (51) by supplying IN protein separately from RT. We failed to clearly show that Vpr-RT-IN fusion rescued the particle maturation in our TEM analysis (data not shown), probably due to the low frequency of the mature particle in our pseudotype preparation even in HIV-1 with the RT-IN intact control (Fig. 3B). It is, therefore, difficult to conclude that RT-IN rescues reverse transcription via fixing particle morphology under our assay conditions. Nonetheless, our results clearly demonstrated that the level of vDNA synthesis (Fig. 7C) and infectivity (Fig. 7B) of ΔRT ΔIN HIV-1 following the expression of the Vpr-RT-IN was over 10-fold higher than that following the expression of Vpr-RT and Vpr-IN separately. During the submission process of our present report, Kessl et al. reported evidence suggesting the biological role of HIV-1 IN binding to the viral RNA genome during virion morphogenesis (57). Therefore, it would be interesting to evaluate the IN binding ability to viral RNA in the context of the RT-IN precursor form. Meanwhile, we noticed that coexpression of Vpr-IN had a negative effect on the vDNA synthesis of HIV-1 (data not shown). We reasoned that excess amounts of the fully processed form of IN might hinder appropriate vRNP complex formation. As demonstrated in previous reports (55), we also noticed that the rescue efficacy by the Vpr-RT-IN was significantly higher for the ΔRT ΔIN HIV-1 mutant than that for the ΔIN HIV-1 lacking only IN expression (data not shown). These data support the idea that the nonenzymatic function of IN might be exerted through the RT-IN precursor form.
A previous study showed that certain IN mutations (ΔIN and C130S) accelerated uncoating (10), in which the CA level within cells was measured at a single time point of 6 h postinfection. In our assay, we monitored the CA disassembly kinetics at earlier time points (1 h to 4 h postinfection). A slight acceleration of capsid disassembly was noticed for the Y15A mutant at 4 h postinfection, although we failed to show its impact with statistical significance. Our results do not deny the notion that certain IN mutations, including Y15A, affect stability of the capsid. Importantly, neither of these studies directly measured a loss of CA from around the vRNP complex. The impact of IN mutations on bona fide uncoating, therefore, remains to be determined.
Implication for a novel inhibitor targeting IN functions.
Tyr15 is also involved in the enzymatic role of HIV-1 IN (42). Although it was difficult to evaluate their impact on the IN enzymatic roles within cells due to the low levels of vDNA generated by the Tyr15 mutants, the Y15W mutant had a higher level of in vivo integration activity than the other lethal mutants of Tyr15 (Fig. 2D). We directly addressed the impact of these mutations on the IN enzymatic function by performing in vitro integration assays. The results of these assays demonstrated that the Y15A and Y15H mutations severely abrogated integration activity, while the Y15F and Y15W mutations retained this activity (Fig. 2E). Thus, Tyr15 might have a structural role in both the enzymatic and nonenzymatic functions of HIV-1 IN, most probably through a benzene ring of the aromatic side chain. Given the proximity of Tyr15 to His16, one of the metal-coordinating HHCC residues, it is possible that the defects caused by the substitutions at Tyr15 might involve effects of these mutations on the helix-turn-helix structure of the IN NTD. In addition, the NTD-CCD interface formed by IN subunits through Tyr15 and the surrounding residues could serve as possible targets for development of novel inhibitors that disrupt the nonenzymatic, as well as the enzymatic, functions of HIV-1 IN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plasmid DNAs.
The pNL4-3lucΔenv plasmid, in which the env gene has been deleted and the nef gene replaced with a firefly luciferase gene, was used to generate HIV-1 pseudotype virus for single-round infection assays (7). We introduced IN mutations into the fragment spanning from the AgeI site (3487) to the SalI site (5786) of pNL4-3lucΔenv through PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis. The mutant fragments (AgeI to SalI) were replaced with the corresponding region of pNL4-3lucΔenv. To generate pNL4-3lucΔenv that lacks IN expression (pNL4-3lucΔINΔenv), two ochre stop codons were introduced 6 nucleotides downstream of the IN initiation site in the pol region. To generate pNL4-3lucΔenv that lacks RT and IN expression (pNL4-3lucΔRTΔINΔenv), two ochre stop codons were introduced 6 nucleotides downstream of the RT initiation site in the pol region of the vpr-defective version of pNL4-3lucΔenv (11). To prepare the bacterial expression vector for His-tagged HIV-1 IN (pET47b-NL43IN), DNA fragments containing the entire IN region were amplified with the primer pair 5′-GGA CCC GGG TTT TTA GAT GGA ATA GAT AAG-3′ and 5′-AGC CTC GAG TTA ATC CTC ATC CTG TCT ACT-3′. The resulting PCR fragments were digested with XmaI and XhoI and ligated into a pET47b(+) vector (Novagen) using its XmaI and XhoI sites. pNL-Nh is a mutant of the NL4-3 proviral clone (58) in which an NheI restriction enzyme cleavage site was blunted and religated, introducing frameshift mutations in the env gene (59). S15-dTomato is a plasmid expressing the 15 N-terminal membrane-targeting amino acids of p60c-Src fused to red fluorescent protein dTomato (60). GFP-Vpr is a plasmid expressing GFP fused to the Vpr coding region of HIV-1 (46). The pEGFP-U3U5 plasmid carrying HIV-1 U3 and U5 ends was generated for the substrate of the in vitro integration assay, as previously described (61). The DNA fragment of HIV-1 U3 and U5 ends derived from pNL4-3 was cloned into the EcoRI and KpnI site of pEGFP-1 (Clontech). HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR)-driven expression constructs for Vpr fusion forms of RT, IN, and RT-IN (pNLTR-Vpr-RRE and its derivatives) were generated as described previously (51, 55) with some modifications. The Rev responsible element (RRE) containing XhoI or MluI sites at the 5′ or 3′ end was generated with primer pair 5′-TGC TCG AGC GGA GCG GCC GCA GGA GC-3′ and 5′-GTA CGC GTC GCG GAA GCT TGT GTA AT-3′, using pMDLg/pRRE as a template (62). The Vpr fragment containing a BssII or SpeI site at the 5′ or 3′ end was generated with the primer pair 5′-TTG CGC GCA GCC GCC GCC ATG GAA CAA GCC CCA GAA GAC-3′ and 5′-GCA CTA GTC CAG GAT CTA CTG GCT CCA TTT CTT GC-3′, using pNL4-3lucΔenv as a template. The RT-IN fragment containing SpeI or XhoI site at 5′ or 3′ end was generated with the primer pair of 5′-GAA CTA GTC TGT TGA CTC AGA TTG GCT GCA CT-3′ and 5′-AGC CTC GAG TTA ATC CTC ATC CTG TCT ACT-3′ using pNL4-3lucΔenv as a template. These three fragments of RRE, Vpr, and RT-IN were ligated in tandem and inserted into the BssHII to MluI fragment of pNL4-3lucΔenv, which contains the entire 5′-LTR and 3′-LTR regions (pNLTR-Vpr-RT-IN-RRE). Similarly, we generated a Vpr-IN fusion protein expression construct (pNLTR-Vpr-IN-RRE) using the primer pairs 5′-TCA CTA GTG GAA TCA GGA AAG TAC TAT TT-3′ and 5′-AGC CTC GAG TTA ATC CTC ATC CTG TCT ACT-3′. To generate a Vpr-RT expression vector (pNLTR-Vpr-RT-RRE), the SpeI/XhoI fragment was prepared using the pNL4-3lucΔINΔenv vector, in which the stop codon was introduced at the IN initiation site. The tat expression vector of pcDNA-Tat-HA (63) was a kind gift from M. Peterlin. The lentivirus vector of pCSII-CMV-MCS (64), rev expression vector of pRSV-rev, and the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein (VSV-G) expression vector of pMD.G (65) were kind gifts from H. Miyoshi.
Analysis of amino acid variations.
An alignment of 3,920 sequences of the full-length open reading frames of HIV-1/SIVcpz IN were obtained from a public database (HIV Sequence Database [http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/HIV/mainpage.html]). Amino acid variations at each position of the IN NTD (1 to 50) were calculated as previously described (43, 44) on the basis of Shannon's equation (66): (xi = G, A, I, V, …), where H(i), p(xi), and i indicate the amino acid entropy score of a given position, the probability of occurrence of a given amino acid at the position, and the number of positions, respectively. An H(i) score of 0 indicates absolute conservation, whereas a score of 4.4 indicates complete randomness.
Preparation and infection of viruses.
HEK293T (ATCC CRL-11268) and HeLa (ATCC CCL-2) cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, 100 units of penicillin G, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin. To prepare HIV-1 pseudotype (HIV-1/VSV-G) viruses, HEK293T cells (1.0 × 106) were transfected with 6 μg of pNL4-3lucΔenv plasmid together with 2 μg of pMD.G, which is a VSV-G expression vector, by using linear polyethylenimine (polyethylenimine max; Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA). At 48 h posttransfection, the culture supernatants were filtered through a 0.45-μm filter (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and treated with 100 U/ml DNase I (Worthington, Lakewood, NJ, USA) in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2 for 1 h at 37°C to remove plasmid DNA contamination. The amount of HIV-1 in each virus preparation was determined by using an enzyme immunoassay (HIV-1 p24 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] kit; Ryukyu Immunology Corp., Okinawa, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Viruses produced in culture supernatants were concentrated by ultracentrifugation at 4°C for 2 h (Beckman TLA110 rotor at 55,000 rpm, 126,000 × g) through a TNE buffer–20% sucrose cushion (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 20% sucrose, 100 mM NaCl). The resulting pellets were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and stored at −80°C. For infection experiments, the DNase-treated virus fraction containing 100 ng of p24 was inoculated into HEK293T cells. To monitor virus infectivity, the cells were harvested at 16 h postinfection and subjected to a luciferase assay (Promega).
Quantitative analysis of HIV-1 DNA after infection.
To monitor vDNA synthesis after infection, HEK293T cells were harvested at 3 h or 16 h postinfection. After washing the cells with PBS, they were disrupted in urea lysis buffer (3.5 M urea, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 175 mM NaCl, and 0.5 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) and subjected to phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The resulting DNA pellet was resolved in 100 μl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]). An aliquot of each DNA sample (100 ng) was subjected to quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis using the real-time LightCycler detection system (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). To monitor the early virus cDNA products (vDNA), we used the primer pair R1-25/AA55, which is specific for the HIV-1 R-U5 region. To monitor the late cDNA products, U3/M661 specific for the U3-gag was used, as described previously (56, 67). To monitor the integrated form HIV-1 DNA, sample DNA was subjected to Alu-PCR as described previously (17). Briefly, total DNA extract (100 ng) from virus-infected cells was amplified with the primer pair Alu primer (5′-TCC CAG CTA CTC GGG AGG CTG AGG-3′) and MLan1185rev (5′-GTA ATT TTG GCT GAC CTG GCT-3′) for 18 cycles using GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega). The PCR products were then diluted 10-fold with TE buffer. The diluted samples were subsequently subjected to real-time qPCR analysis with the R1-25/AA55 primer set.
Endogenous RT assay.
We performed endogenous RT (ERT) assays using a previously described method (7, 45) with some modifications. Reaction mixtures contained ERT buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 5 mM MgCl2, 60 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.01% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate [dNTP], 10 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]), and 10 ng of viral p24 in a final volume of 20 μl. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 16 h. For a negative control, a reaction mixture without dNTPs was performed in parallel. The reactions were stopped by adding 1 μl of 100 mM EDTA and boiling at 98°C for 5 min. The amount of the cDNA product was assessed by real-time qPCR with the primer pair R1-25/AA55.
Western blot analysis.
Concentrated virions were solubilized in SDS sample buffer (60 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 2% SDS, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol [2-ME], 10% glycerol, 0.02% bromophenol blue) and then boiled at 98°C for 5 min. Next, samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE using a 5 to 20% gradient polyacrylamide gel, followed by transfer to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (0.2-μm pore size). Target proteins on the membrane were reacted with specific primary antibodies, mouse monoclonal anti-p24 antibody (ab9071; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-RT (ab63911; Abcam), or rabbit polyclonal anti-IN antibody (AB-INT100; XpressBio). After a subsequent reaction with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies, images of the reactions were obtained by using a chemiluminescence imaging system (Chemilum ImageQuant Las 400 mini; GE Healthcare, Japan).
In situ capsid uncoating assay.
The in situ capsid uncoating assay (46) was conducted as previously described (47). The labeled virus was generated by cotransfecting 9 μg of pNL-Nh mutant proviral plasmid, 4 μg of S15-dTomato, 4 μg of VSV-G-expressing plasmid, and 1 μg of GFP-Vpr into 5 × 106 of 293T cells by using polyethylenimine (molecular weight, 25,000; Polysciences). At 2 days posttransfection, culture medium was collected and filtered through a 0.45-μm filter. Viral titers were determined with the RETROtek antigen ELISA kit (ZeptoMetrix, Buffalo, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. HeLa cells in 24-well plates were spinoculated with the labeled virus for 2 h at 16°C in the presence or absence of 40 nM bafilomycin A (BafA; Sigma). Virus-containing supernatant then was removed and replaced with 37°C medium in the presence or absence of BafA, and the cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde (Polysciences) in 0.1 M PIPES [piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid); pH 6.8] at each indicated time point postinfection. The fixed HeLa cells were permeabilized with blocking solution (PBS, 10% normal donkey serum [Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories], 0.01% Triton X-100, 0.01% NaN3) for 5 min at room temperature, stained with anti-p24 monoclonal antibody (MAb) AG3.0 (NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program) in blocking solution without Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature for primary staining and secondarily stained with Cy-5-labeled donkey anti-mouse antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) for 30 min at room temperature. Images were collected and deconvoluted with an Eclipse TE2000-E inverted microscope and NIS-Elements AR software (Nikon). Following deconvolution, images were blinded for identity to remove bias during counting. The number of GFP-positive cytoplasmic virion particles was assessed at each time point, and each particle was individually inspected for punctate dTomato fluorescent signal and p24 Cy-5 signal.
Preparation of recombinant HIV-1 IN.
The Escherichia coli BL21 derivative strain SoluBL21 (Genlantis, San Diego, CA, USA) was transformed with pET47b–NL4-3IN vector. His-tagged IN was expressed in 400 ml of LB culture with 0.3 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside for 4 h at 25°C. For protein purification, each bacterial pellet was treated with 10 ml of BugBuster protein extraction reagent containg benzonase nuclease (Novagen) for 20 min at room temperature. The suspension was sonicated in 80 ml of sonication buffer {50 mM HEPES-NaOH [pH 8.5], 1.2 M NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 μM ZnCl2, 10 mM CHAPS, 10% glycerol; CHAPS is 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate} in the presence of 1× protease inhibiter cocktail (Roche), 14.4 mM 2-ME, and 20 mM imidazole, and then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was incubated with Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid–agarose (Qiagen) at 4°C for 2 h with gentle mixing. After extensively washing the resin with wash buffer (20 mM HEPES-NaOH [pH 8.0], 500 mM NaCl, 5 mM CHAPS, 10% glycerol, 10 mM imidazole, 5 mM DTT), His-tagged IN was eluted with elution buffer (20 mM HEPES-NaOH [pH 8.0], 500 mM NaCl, 350 mM imidazole, 5 mM CHAPS, 10% glycerol, 5 mM DTT). The His tag was removed by treatment with Turbo3C protease (Accelagen) at 4°C for 20 h, and then the sample was subjected to ion exchange column purification (HiTrap SP HP column; GE Healthcare). Eluted proteins were concentrated with Amicon Ultra (molecular weight cutoff [MWCO], 10,000; Millipore) and dialyzed against IN dialysis buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 20% glycerol, 1 M NaCl, 5 mM CHAPS, 5 mM DTT) using a nitrocellulose membrane dialysis cup (MWCO, 12,000; BioTech) for 24 h at 4°C. The resulting product was stored at −80°C, and the protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad).
In vitro integration assay with the miniviral DNA substrate.
An in vitro integration assay (61) was performed with the reaction mixtures (20 mM HEPES-NaOH [pH 7.5], 15% polyethylene glycol 8000, 500 ng of ScaI-digested pEGFP-U3U5, and 150 ng rIN) incubated at 37°C for 16 h. Each reaction was quenched by addition of SDS to 0.5%. After incubation at 72°C for 10 min, samples were analyzed by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Recombinant IN cross-linking.
Recombinant IN (20 ng) was suspended in 18 μl of cross-linking buffer (20 mM HEPES-NaOH [pH 7.0], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 μM ZnCl2). The cross-linking reaction was initiated by adding 2 μl of 2 mM bis-sulfosuccinimidyl suberate (BS3), and the samples were incubated at 25°C for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 5× SDS sample buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 30% glycerol, 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 5% 2-ME, 0.02% bromophenol blue). Samples were analyzed by Western blotting using Nu-PAGE 4 to 12% gradient bis-Tris gels with morpholineethanesulfonic acid (MES)-SDS running buffer (Invitrogen). IN was detected with a mouse monoclonal anti-IN antibody (ab66645; Abcam). After a subsequent reaction with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies, images of the reactions were obtained by using a chemiluminescence imaging system (Chemilum ImageQuant Las 400 mini; GE Healthcare, Japan). Signal intensity was measured with ImageJ software.
Incorporation of Vpr-fusion protein into virus.
HEK293T cells were transfected with pNL4-3lucΔRTΔINΔenv and pMD.G together with 3 μg of Vpr-fusion protein expression plasmids (pNLTR-Vpr-RRE and its derivatives). At 48 h posttransfection, the culture supernatants were harvested and treated with DNase I as described above.
Expression of Vpr-RT-IN and cross-linking.
HEK293T cells were transfected with the pNLTR-Vpr-RT-IN-RRE expression plasmid together with pcDNA-Tat-HA and pRSV-rev. At 48 h posttransfection, the cells were harvested, and the cell lysate was prepared for cross-linking analyses as described previously (68) with some modifications (14). Cells were lysed with cell lysis buffer for cross-linking (20 mM MES-NaOH [pH 7.0], 10% [wt/vol] sucrose, 14.4 mM 2-ME, 1 mM MgCl2, 400 mM NaCl, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40). Synthetic HIV-1 RNA was prepared by using the T7 in vitro transcription system (RiboMAX large-scale RNA production systems; Promega) using the pCSII-CMV-MCS vector as described previously (56). Cell lysates were then incubated with 8.3 nM HIV-1 RNA at 4°C for 20 min, followed by reaction with 2 mM BS3 at room temperature for 20 min or at 4°C for 6 h. The cross-linking reaction was terminated by the addition of 5× SDS sample buffer.
TEM.
HEK293T cells were transfected with pNL4-3lucΔenv (WT-IN, Y15A, ΔIN, or ΔRT ΔIN) and pMD.G with or without Vpr-fusion protein expression plasmids (pNLTR-Vpr-RRE and its derivatives) as described above. At 40 h after transfection, the cells were harvested with a cell scraper and washed twice with ice-cold PBS. Transfected cells were then prefixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, for 2 h at room temperature, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, and embedded in Epon 812 (TAAB Laboratories). Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and then observed under a transmission electron microscope (HT7700; Hitachi) at 80 kV.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank I. S. Y. Chen for providing pNL4-3lucΔenv, H. Miyoshi for providing pCSII-CMV-MCS, pRSV-rev, and pMD, and T. Okamoto and M. Peterlin for providing pcDNA-Tat-HA. We also thank the Research Institute for Microbial Diseases (BIKEN), Osaka University, and the National Institute of Infectious Diseases for use of their experimental facilities and for technical assistance.
We declare that we have no competing interests.
This work was supported by grants for research on HIV/AIDS from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) and by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS; KAKENHI 15K15139).
T.M. conceived the study. T.T., E.T., M.T., K.T., M.Y., Y.H., A.H., T.S., H.S., M.K., and T.M. performed the experiments and/or participated in the experimental design. T.T. and T.M. wrote the manuscript. E.T., M.Y., H.S., A.H., T.S., and M.K. edited the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Brown PO. 1997. Integration, p 131–203. In Coffin JM, Hughes SH, Varmus HE (ed), Retroviruses. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hazuda DJ. 2012. HIV integrase as a target for antiretroviral therapy. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 7:383–389. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e3283567309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Grobler JA, Hazuda DJ. 2014. Resistance to HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors: in vitro findings and clinical consequences. Curr Opin Virol 8:98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2014.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Masuda T. 2011. Non-enzymatic functions of retroviral integrase: the next target for novel anti-HIV drug development. Front Microbiol 2:210. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Engelman A, Kessl JJ, Kvaratskhelia M. 2013. Allosteric inhibition of HIV-1 integrase activity. Curr Opin Chem Biol 17:339–345. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Feng L, Larue RC, Slaughter A, Kessl JJ, Kvaratskhelia M. 2015. HIV-1 integrase multimerization as a therapeutic target. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 389:93–119. doi: 10.1007/82_2015_439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Masuda T, Planelles V, Krogstad P, Chen IS. 1995. Genetic analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase and the U3 att site: unusual phenotype of mutants in the zinc finger-like domain. J Virol 69:6687–6696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Engelman A, Englund G, Orenstein JM, Martin MA, Craigie R. 1995. Multiple effects of mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase on viral replication. J Virol 69:2729–2736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Leavitt AD, Robles G, Alesandro N, Varmus HE. 1996. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase mutants retain in vitro integrase activity yet fail to integrate viral DNA efficiently during infection. J Virol 70:721–728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Briones MS, Dobard CW, Chow SA. 2010. Role of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase in uncoating of the viral core. J Virol 84:5181–5190. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02382-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tsurutani N, Kubo M, Maeda Y, Ohashi T, Yamamoto N, Kannagi M, Masuda T. 2000. Identification of critical amino acid residues in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 IN required for efficient proviral DNA formation at steps prior to integration in dividing and nondividing cells. J Virol 74:4795–4806. doi: 10.1128/JVI.74.10.4795-4806.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhu K, Dobard C, Chow SA. 2004. Requirement for integrase during reverse transcription of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and the effect of cysteine mutations of integrase on its interactions with reverse transcriptase. J Virol 78:5045–5055. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.10.5045-5055.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dobard CW, Briones MS, Chow SA. 2007. Molecular mechanisms by which human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase stimulates the early steps of reverse transcription. J Virol 81:10037–10046. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00519-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nishitsuji H, Hayashi T, Takahashi T, Miyano M, Kannagi M, Masuda T. 2009. Augmentation of reverse transcription by integrase through an interaction with host factor, SIP1/Gemin2 is critical for HIV-1 infection. PLoS One 4:e7825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wilkinson TA, Januszyk K, Phillips ML, Tekeste SS, Zhang M, Miller JT, Le Grice SF, Clubb RT, Chow SA. 2009. Identifying and characterizing a functional HIV-1 reverse transcriptase-binding site on integrase. J Biol Chem 284:7931–7939. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806241200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tekeste SS, Wilkinson TA, Weiner EM, Xu X, Miller JT, Le Grice SF, Clubb RT, Chow SA. 2015. Interaction between reverse transcriptase and integrase is required for reverse transcription during HIV-1 replication. J Virol 89:12058–12069. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01471-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ikeda T, Nishitsuji H, Zhou X, Nara N, Ohashi T, Kannagi M, Masuda T. 2004. Evaluation of the functional involvement of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase in nuclear import of viral cDNA during acute infection. J Virol 78:11563–11573. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.21.11563-11573.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ao Z, Huang G, Yao H, Xu Z, Labine M, Cochrane AW, Yao X. 2007. Interaction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase with cellular nuclear import receptor importin 7 and its impact on viral replication. J Biol Chem 282:13456–13467. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610546200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Christ F, Thys W, De Rijck J, Gijsbers R, Albanese A, Arosio D, Emiliani S, Rain JC, Benarous R, Cereseto A, Debyser Z. 2008. Transportin-SR2 imports HIV into the nucleus. Curr Biol 18:1192–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Engelman A. 1999. In vivo analysis of retroviral integrase structure and function. Adv Virus Res 52:411–426. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60309-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Christ F, Voet A, Marchand A, Nicolet S, Desimmie BA, Marchand D, Bardiot D, Van der Veken NJ, Van Remoortel B, Strelkov SV, De Maeyer M, Chaltin P, Debyser Z. 2010. Rational design of small-molecule inhibitors of the LEDGF/p75-integrase interaction and HIV replication. Nat Chem Biol 6:442–448. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Christ F, Shaw S, Demeulemeester J, Desimmie BA, Marchand A, Butler S, Smets W, Chaltin P, Westby M, Debyser Z, Pickford C. 2012. Small-molecule inhibitors of the LEDGF/p75 binding site of integrase block HIV replication and modulate integrase multimerization. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4365–4374. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00717-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jurado KA, Wang H, Slaughter A, Feng L, Kessl JJ, Koh Y, Wang W, Ballandras-Colas A, Patel PA, Fuchs JR, Kvaratskhelia M, Engelman A. 2013. Allosteric integrase inhibitor potency is determined through the inhibition of HIV-1 particle maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:8690–8695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300703110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Desimmie BA, Schrijvers R, Demeulemeester J, Borrenberghs D, Weydert C, Thys W, Vets S, Van Remoortel B, Hofkens J, De Rijck J, Hendrix J, Bannert N, Gijsbers R, Christ F, Debyser Z. 2013. LEDGINs inhibit late stage HIV-1 replication by modulating integrase multimerization in the virions. Retrovirology 10:57. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-10-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Balakrishnan M, Yant SR, Tsai L, O'Sullivan C, Bam RA, Tsai A, Niedziela-Majka A, Stray KM, Sakowicz R, Cihlar T. 2013. Non-catalytic site HIV-1 integrase inhibitors disrupt core maturation and induce a reverse transcription block in target cells. PLoS One 8:e74163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fontana J, Jurado KA, Cheng N, Ly NL, Fuchs JR, Gorelick RJ, Engelman AN, Steven AC. 2015. Distribution and redistribution of HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein in immature, mature, and integrase-inhibited virions: a role for integrase in maturation. J Virol 89:9765–9780. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01522-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li X, Krishnan L, Cherepanov P, Engelman A. 2011. Structural biology of retroviral DNA integration. Virology 411:194–205. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dyda F, Hickman AB, Jenkins TM, Engelman A, Craigie R, Davies DR. 1994. Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of HIV-1 integrase: similarity to other polynucleotidyl transferases. Science 266:1981–1986. doi: 10.1126/science.7801124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Eijkelenboom AP, Lutzke RA, Boelens R, Plasterk RH, Kaptein R, Hard K. 1995. The DNA-binding domain of HIV-1 integrase has an SH3-like fold. Nat Struct Biol 2:807–810. doi: 10.1038/nsb0995-807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cai M, Zheng R, Caffrey M, Craigie R, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM. 1997. Solution structure of the N-terminal zinc binding domain of HIV-1 integrase. Nat Struct Biol 4:567–577. doi: 10.1038/nsb0797-567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang JY, Ling H, Yang W, Craigie R. 2001. Structure of a two-domain fragment of HIV-1 integrase: implications for domain organization in the intact protein. EMBO J 20:7333–7343. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.24.7333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen JC, Krucinski J, Miercke LJ, Finer-Moore JS, Tang AH, Leavitt AD, Stroud RM. 2000. Crystal structure of the HIV-1 integrase catalytic core and C-terminal domains: a model for viral DNA binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:8233–8238. doi: 10.1073/pnas.150220297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hare S, Gupta SS, Valkov E, Engelman A, Cherepanov P. 2010. Retroviral intasome assembly and inhibition of DNA strand transfer. Nature 464:232–236. doi: 10.1038/nature08784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yin Z, Shi K, Banerjee S, Pandey KK, Bera S, Grandgenett DP, Aihara H. 2016. Crystal structure of the Rous sarcoma virus intasome. Nature 530:362–366. doi: 10.1038/nature16950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ballandras-Colas A, Brown M, Cook NJ, Dewdney TG, Demeler B, Cherepanov P, Lyumkis D, Engelman AN. 2016. Cryo-EM reveals a novel octameric integrase structure for betaretroviral intasome function. Nature 530:358–361. doi: 10.1038/nature16955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Krishnan L, Li X, Naraharisetty HL, Hare S, Cherepanov P, Engelman A. 2010. Structure-based modeling of the functional HIV-1 intasome and its inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:15910–15915. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002346107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cherepanov P, Devroe E, Silver PA, Engelman A. 2004. Identification of an evolutionarily conserved domain in human lens epithelium-derived growth factor/transcriptional co-activator p75 (LEDGF/p75) that binds HIV-1 integrase. J Biol Chem 279:48883–48892. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406307200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nakamura T, Masuda T, Goto T, Sano K, Nakai M, Harada S. 1997. Lack of infectivity of HIV-1 integrase zinc finger-like domain mutant with morphologically normal maturation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 239:715–722. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lu R, Vandegraaff N, Cherepanov P, Engelman A. 2005. Lys-34, dispensable for integrase catalysis, is required for preintegration complex function and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication. J Virol 79:12584–12591. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.19.12584-12591.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lu R, Ghory HZ, Engelman A. 2005. Genetic analyses of conserved residues in the carboxyl-terminal domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase. J Virol 79:10356–10368. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.16.10356-10368.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nomura Y, Masuda T, Kawai G. 2006. Structural analysis of a mutant of the HIV-1 integrase zinc finger domain that forms a single conformation. J Biochem 139:753–759. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvj085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hare S, Di Nunzio F, Labeja A, Wang J, Engelman A, Cherepanov P. 2009. Structural basis for functional tetramerization of lentiviral integrase. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000515. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Motomura K, Oka T, Yokoyama M, Nakamura H, Mori H, Ode H, Hansman GS, Katayama K, Kanda T, Tanaka T, Takeda N, Sato H, Norovirus Surveillance Group of Japan . 2008. Identification of monomorphic and divergent haplotypes in the 2006-2007 norovirus GII/4 epidemic population by genomewide tracing of evolutionary history. J Virol 82:11247–11262. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00897-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Oka T, Yokoyama M, Katayama K, Tsunemitsu H, Yamamoto M, Miyashita K, Ogawa S, Motomura K, Mori H, Nakamura H, Wakita T, Takeda N, Sato H. 2009. Structural and biological constraints on diversity of regions immediately upstream of cleavage sites in calicivirus precursor proteins. Virology 394:119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Debyser Z, Vandamme AM, Pauwels R, Baba M, Desmyter J, De Clercq E. 1992. Kinetics of inhibition of endogenous human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcription by 2′,3′-dideoxynucleoside 5′-triphosphate, tetrahydroimidazo-[4,5,1-jk][1,4]-benzodiazepin-2(1H)-thione, and 1-[(2-hydroxyethoxy)methyl]-6-(phenylthio)thymine derivatives. J Biol Chem 267:11769–11776. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Campbell EM, Perez O, Melar M, Hope TJ. 2007. Labeling HIV-1 virions with two fluorescent proteins allows identification of virions that have productively entered the target cell. Virology 360:286–293. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Takeda E, Kono K, Hulme AE, Hope TJ, Nakayama EE, Shioda T. 2015. Fluorescent image analysis of HIV-1 and HIV-2 uncoating kinetics in the presence of Old World monkey TRIM5alpha. PLoS One 10:e0121199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhao Z, McKee CJ, Kessl JJ, Santos WL, Daigle JE, Engelman A, Verdine G, Kvaratskhelia M. 2008. Subunit-specific protein footprinting reveals significant structural rearrangements and a role for N-terminal Lys-14 of HIV-1 integrase during viral DNA binding. J Biol Chem 283:5632–5641. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705241200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Busschots K, Voet A, De Maeyer M, Rain JC, Emiliani S, Benarous R, Desender L, Debyser Z, Christ F. 2007. Identification of the LEDGF/p75 binding site in HIV-1 integrase. J Mol Biol 365:1480–1492. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rahman S, Lu R, Vandegraaff N, Cherepanov P, Engelman A. 2007. Structure-based mutagenesis of the integrase-LEDGF/p75 interface uncouples a strict correlation between in vitro protein binding and HIV-1 fitness. Virology 357:79–90. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wu X, Liu H, Xiao H, Conway JA, Hehl E, Kalpana GV, Prasad V, Kappes JC. 1999. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase protein promotes reverse transcription through specific interactions with the nucleoprotein reverse transcription complex. J Virol 73:2126–2135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Engelman A, Liu Y, Chen H, Farzan M, Dyda F. 1997. Structure-based mutagenesis of the catalytic domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase. J Virol 71:3507–3514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Berthoux L, Sebastian S, Muesing MA, Luban J. 2007. The role of lysine 186 in HIV-1 integrase multimerization. Virology 364:227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.02.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sundquist WI, Krausslich HG. 2012. HIV-1 assembly, budding, and maturation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2:a006924. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wu X, Liu H, Xiao H, Conway JA, Hunter E, Kappes JC. 1997. Functional RT and IN incorporated into HIV-1 particles independently of the Gag/Pol precursor protein. EMBO J 16:5113–5122. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.16.5113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Masuda T, Sato Y, Huang YL, Koi S, Takahata T, Hasegawa A, Kawai G, Kannagi M. 2015. Fate of HIV-1 cDNA intermediates during reverse transcription is dictated by transcription initiation site of virus genomic RNA. Sci Rep 5:17680. doi: 10.1038/srep17680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kessl JJ, Kutluay SB, Townsend D, Rebensburg S, Slaughter A, Larue RC, Shkriabai N, Bakouche N, Fuchs JR, Bieniasz PD, Kvaratskhelia M. 2016. HIV-1 integrase binds the viral RNA genome and is essential during virion morphogenesis. Cell 166:1257–1268.e1212. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Adachi A, Gendelman HE, Koenig S, Folks T, Willey R, Rabson A, Martin MA. 1986. Production of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-associated retrovirus in human and nonhuman cells transfected with an infectious molecular clone. J Virol 59:284–291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ohishi M, Shioda T, Sakuragi J. 2007. Retro-transduction by virus pseudotyped with glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus. Virology 362:131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kono K, Takeda E, Tsutsui H, Kuroishi A, Hulme AE, Hope TJ, Nakayama EE, Shioda T. 2013. Slower uncoating is associated with impaired replicative capability of simian-tropic HIV-1. PLoS One 8:e72531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Cherepanov P, Surratt D, Toelen J, Pluymers W, Griffith J, De Clercq E, Debyser Z. 1999. Activity of recombinant HIV-1 integrase on mini-HIV DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 27:2202–2210. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.10.2202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dull T, Zufferey R, Kelly M, Mandel RJ, Nguyen M, Trono D, Naldini L. 1998. A third-generation lentivirus vector with a conditional packaging system. J Virol 72:8463–8471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cujec TP, Okamoto H, Fujinaga K, Meyer J, Chamberlin H, Morgan DO, Peterlin BM. 1997. The HIV transactivator TAT binds to the CDK-activating kinase and activates the phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev 11:2645–2657. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.20.2645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Miyoshi H, Blomer U, Takahashi M, Gage FH, Verma IM. 1998. Development of a self-inactivating lentivirus vector. J Virol 72:8150–8157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Naldini L, Blomer U, Gallay P, Ory D, Mulligan R, Gage FH, Verma IM, Trono D. 1996. In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science 272:263–267. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5259.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shannon CE. 1997. The mathematical theory of communication. 1963. MD Comput 14:306–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zack JA, Arrigo SJ, Weitsman SR, Go AS, Haislip A, Chen IS. 1990. HIV-1 entry into quiescent primary lymphocytes: molecular analysis reveals a labile, latent viral structure. Cell 61:213–222. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90802-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cherepanov P, Maertens G, Proost P, Devreese B, Van Beeumen J, Engelborghs Y, De Clercq E, Debyser Z. 2003. HIV-1 integrase forms stable tetramers and associates with LEDGF/p75 protein in human cells. J Biol Chem 278:372–381. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209278200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]