Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Dec 19;6:39133. doi: 10.1038/srep39133

Ultrashort pulse laser ablation of dielectrics: Thresholds, mechanisms, role of breakdown

Inam Mirza 1,*, Nadezhda M Bulgakova 1,2,a,*, Jan Tomáštík 3, Václav Michálek 4, Ondřej Haderka 3, Ladislav Fekete 5, Tomáš Mocek 1
PMCID: PMC5171827  PMID: 27991543

Abstract

In this paper, we establish connections between the thresholds and mechanisms of the damage and white-light generation upon femtosecond laser irradiation of wide-bandgap transparent materials. On the example of Corning Willow glass, evolution of ablation craters, their quality, and white-light emission were studied experimentally for 130-fs, 800-nm laser pulses. The experimental results indicate co-existence of several ablation mechanisms which can be separated in time. Suppression of the phase explosion mechanism of ablation was revealed at the middle of the irradiation spots. At high laser fluences, air ionization was found to strongly influence ablation rate and quality and the main mechanisms of the influence are analysed. To gain insight into the processes triggered by laser radiation in glass, numerical simulations have been performed with accounting for the balance of laser energy absorption and its distribution/redistribution in the sample, including bremsstrahlung emission from excited free-electron plasma. The simulations have shown an insignificant role of avalanche ionization at such short durations of laser pulses while pointing to high average energy of electrons up to several dozens of eV. At multi-pulse ablation regimes, improvement of crater quality was found as compared to single/few pulses.

Since the invention of lasers in early 60s, material ablation with various laser sources has been one of the most demanded technologies for drilling micro/nanoholes in various materials, cutting, formation of trenches and other surface and volume relief structures, and material funtionalization1,2,3,4,5. Although laser processing of materials is much finer as compared to mechanical means, the laser ablation quality is still a matter of research targeted to cleaner crater production with transverse dimensions down to submicrometer size. Among lasers, femtosecond laser sources have been proven to enable production of finest ablation structures due to reduced heat-affected zone6,7,8,9. For inorganic dielectrics with low heat conductivity and non-linear light absorption, the fs-laser processing quality can be even higher compared to metals if large temperature and, hence, stress gradients do not lead to crack formation in brittle materials2,3. Damage can be highly localized when radiation is absorbed by permanent and/or transient photo-induced defect states10,11. However, due to a complicated interplay between numerous processes initiated by laser action on bandgap materials, the quality of laser processing remains to be a hot topic for research. Laser energy deposition to each material has specific features in terms of damage threshold, efficiency and quality of ablation that is determined by physical material properties.

On the border of 21st century, several historical experiments were performed which gave invaluable insights into the processes upon ultrashort laser ablation of transparent dielectrics and indicated possible routes for ultrafine ablation12,13,14,15,16,17. Those experiments were mostly done for fused silica as an excellent model for in-depth studies due to well-known properties including non-linear behaviour, transient and permanent defects, and wide use in numerous applications18. Figure 1 summarises main findings. Stuart et al.15 identified the damage threshold Fth for fused silica at 800 nm wavelength by microscopy inspection of the irradiated area. They demonstrated that, at pulse durations τL below ~10 ps, the Fth value is almost constant with only slight decrease toward shorter pulses down to 100 fs while, with increasing τL above 10 ps, Fth is increasing as ~τL0.5 (black dots in Fig. 1). At the same years, several groups made attempts to connect free-electron plasma lightning upon laser excitation with the damage threshold12,13,14. It was shown that appearance of luminous plasma (optical breakdown) could be a good mean to identify Fth in fused silica at τL ≥ 10 ps. However, at shorter pulses, optical breakdown measurements are contradicting. For femtosecond laser pulses, Du et al.12,13 reported the optical breakdown threshold FOB being several times higher than the damage threshold. Varel et al.14 also found somewhat higher FOB compared to the damage threshold at τL in the range of 500 fs–4.5 ps while at shorter pulses they measured the same values for FOB and Fth. Note that in ref. 14 the reported FOB and Fth values were a factor of two higher than reported by Stuart et al.15. At τL ≤ 100 fs, the FOB value decreases with shortening pulse duration13,14 as well as Fth as shown by Lebugle et al.19 (empty triangles in Fig. 1). At very short laser pulses, the thresholds for damage19 and plasma luminescence20 coincide (see Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Linking the laser ablation and breakdown thresholds and ablation quality at femto- and picosecond pulse durations for fused silica glass.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The damage thresholds are given by black dots (Stuart et al.15) and open triangles (Lebugle et al.19). Black rhombic symbol shows the optical breakdown threshold measured at pulse duration of 25 fs by Li et al.20. At the upper panel, the SEM images of laser-produced craters are introduced from the work by Lenzner et al.17 with corresponding irradiation regimes shown by stars. Two-colour hexagons indicate the damage (bottom) and breakdown (top) thresholds measured in the present work for Corning’s Willow glass. The regimes studied in this work are shown by vertical arrow pointing up with underlining the conditions of special interest between two thresholds by ellipse.

Lenzner et al.16,17 demonstrated a possibility of production of perfect crater shapes when decreasing the pulse duration to few-cycles (upper panel of Fig. 1). The edges of craters formed by 3-ps and 220-fs pulses are cracked due to high pressure gradients generated by swift heating the irradiated area. Shorter pulses (20 fs, Fig. 1) yield in better crater quality, culminating in the perfect crater produced by 5-fs laser pulse. As for such pulses FOB values have not been measured, it can be speculated that the generated free-electron population has no time to become hot enough for transferring much energy to the lattice. As a result, crater formation happens in a “cold ablation” regime without generation of high pressure gradients damaging the crater edges. It should be noted that the “cold ablation” regime is widely accepted to be inherent for IR lasers at τL ≤ 10 ps21.

In this paper, we explore the “cold ablation” regime for another glass material, Corning Willow glass (alkali-free borosilicate glass of complex composition)22. Compared to fused silica, such glass has lower annealing and melting points and presumably lower band gap. One can expect that the difference in physical properties results in different damage thresholds. However, the same Fth has been found for our irradiation conditions (Fig. 1). The results of ablation have been studied systematically as a function of laser fluence at 130-fs pules of 800-nm wavelength from the point of view of crater morphology, ablation mechanisms, and free-electron plasma luminosity for single and several laser pulses. To get insight into free-electron plasma formation, modelling has been performed which does not support the concept of “cold ablation”. Although modelling was done for fused silica, the conclusions can be applied to the studied glass in view of similarity in the damage thresholds. Evidences for coexistence of several mechanisms of ablation, including air plasma effects, are discussed.

Results

Laser ablation of Corning Willow glass22 was performed by Ti:Sapphire laser system (Coherent, Legend Elite fs-laser series, 800 nm central wavelength, 130 fs pulse duration, maximum repetition rate of 1 kHz). The main aim was to establish direct links between the three laser-glass interaction aspects, the thresholds for ablation and optical breakdown and ablation quality.

Single-pulse ablation

Figure 2(a) demonstrates the white-light spectra collected from irradiated Willow glass which can be attributed to bremsstrahlung radiation of free electrons generated in the laser-excited sample. The damage threshold was determined at the average fluence of ~2 J/cm2 (Fig. 1). At 2.76 J/cm2, a well-defined, ~150-nm deep crater with diameter of 10 μm is formed (Fig. 2(d)). The crater is surrounded by a 50-nm high rim whose formation can be attributed to the fact that this material is softer and has a lower melting point compared to fused silica where a rim was not observed17.

Figure 2. Linking optical emission with crater morphology.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Early stage optical emission spectra from Willow glass which belongs to a hot electron plasma excited in the sample. Below 13 J/cm2 emission is hardly detectable. (b–d) AFM profiles of the single-shot ablation craters obtained with the average fluences of 59 J/cm2 (b), 24 J/cm2 (c), 2.76 J/cm2 (d).

Electron plasma luminosity from the sample was detected well above Fth, starting from ~13 J/cm2 (FOB, Fig. 1), that coincides with the data for fused silica obtained in refs 12 and 13. With increasing laser fluence above FOB, the craters change their forms with clear appearance of a double-rim structure (Fig. 2(b–c)). The sequence of the crater profiles with increasing laser fluence is presented in Fig. 3 (see also Supplementary Fig. S1, in addition to Fig. 2(b–d)).

Figure 3. Cross sections of the craters.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Primary rims surrounding ablated area are shown by black horizontal arrows. The rims surrounding the secondary craters appearing inside the primary ones are marked by vertical arrows. An outer rim which is observed at energies above 100 J/cm2 far beyond the laser irradiated area (marked by empty arrows at the bottom figure) is attributed to the air plasma reemission effect.

As expected, the crater diameter and depth are increasing with fluence. At 13 J/cm2 the crater is ~25-μm wide and ~400-nm deep. Namely starting from this breakdown threshold, a “secondary crater” appears inside the ablated volume with its “secondary” rim which is well seen at higher fluences (Figs 2(b,c) and 3, and Supplementary Fig. S1). The positions of rims surrounding secondary (internal) craters and the crater bottom geometry indicate that the spatial distribution of laser intensity is asymmetric. It can be due to several reasons such as astigmatism and the output beam divergence. As a result, the M2 beam quality factor becomes different for two orthogonal directions across the beam axis with deviating from a diffraction-limited TEM00 laser beam23 and yielding a non-circular crater. At high laser fluences, the crater becomes more symmetric (Fig. 3, 112 J/cm2). Most plausibly, this can be attributed to air ionization effects24,25. Upon propagation toward the sample surface, a high-intensity laser beam induces ionization of air molecules that is more efficient in the higher intensity regions of the beam cross section. Before reaching the sample surface, the laser beam can be essentially flattened due to air ionization24. Thus, air ionization can lead to beam “self-healing” via smoothing high-intensity imperfectnesses.

Influence of air ionization on crater formation is confirmed by the geometry of craters produced at high laser fluences, of the order of 100 J/cm2 and higher (Fig. 3, 112 J/cm2). With almost twice increased fluence, the depth of the crater is increasing only slightly (Fig. 3, 59 and 112 J/cm2) that can be attributed to enhanced light absorption during beam propagation through air at larger fluences due to multiphoton/tunneling ionization24. At fluences ≥100 J/cm2 a third, outer rim is formed with the diameter more than 3 times exceeding the beam diameter (1/e2). The incident laser energy is too low at the positions between primary and outer rims and, thus, cannot induce material damage. Several mechanisms can contribute to such “matryoshka-like” crater formation with material damage beyond the irradiation spot: (a) air and ablation plasma reemission during recombination of plasmas24 (note that air plasma recombines within several nanoseconds after femtosecond laser pulses26 while ablation products can produce light emission at a longer timescale upon plume expansion27); (b) strong scattering of the tail part of the beam by air plasma produced by the beam front28; (c) a strong shock wave generated upon air plasma recombination which travels outward the plasma region and can induce material modification at its contact with the surface3,24. It should be mentioned that, for our τL at fluences above ~80 J/cm2, the beam propagation is affected by the Kerr nonlinearity that provides more effective air ionization before the geometrical focus and, thus, higher scattering of laser light.

Inspection of the craters with AFM (Fig. 4) has shown that the crater bottoms are covered by nanoparticles. Nanoparticles are less abundant at small fluences, being at the same time of larger sizes compared to those at higher fluences. Such morphology of redeposited particles is in line with the phase explosion mechanism of ablation29,30,31,32. From the theory of metastable liquid30,32, it is known that a higher overheating of melt toward the spinodal results in an exponential increase of the rate of vapor nucleation with smaller critical nuclei. This in turn causes disintegration of the overheated melt into vapor and particles of smaller sizes compared to the regimes of lower overheating. As material heating is essentially non-uniform across the irradiation spot, at the spot edges the mechanism of spallation can dominate29,33, leading to the formation of the rims around the crater assisted by the recoil pressure of the ablation products34.

Figure 4. AFM images of the parts of the crater bottoms after single-pulse ablation at different laser fluences.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The color scales depict the height of the crater bottom relief with deposited nanoparticles.

If the origin of the outer rim can be attributed to air ionization effects, appearance of the “internal crater” (or the secondary rim inside the primary crater) is not so clear. One can speculate that this secondary crater formation is conditioned by different mechanisms of ablation dominating at different regions within the laser irradiation spot and developing on different timescales. One of the plausible explanations could be in delayed phase explosion in the middle part of the irradiation spot, due to swift atomization of material in the surface layer of this part (see Fig. 16 in ref. 33). An atomized material layer can temporally suppress the development of explosive vaporization of deeper layers by the recoil force until its expansion and pressure dropping nearby the surface. Coincidence of the secondary rim formation with FOB can also indicate the possibility of the Coulomb explosion mechanism of ablation35,36 from the middle part of the irradiated area where highly-luminous (and hence very hot) electron plasma is created. Photoemission measurements37 have revealed superfast electron current from fused silica (electron Coulomb explosion). Such a strong photoemission can also be followed by Coulomb explosion of ions at high velocities, thus assisting in temporal suppression of explosive material emission from deeper layers. Additional discussion of the ablation mechanisms is presented below based on the modelling results.

Multi-pulse ablation

As “superclean” ablation reported by Lenzner et al.16,17. was achieved in multi-pulse irradiation regime, of high interest is to investigate how the crater quality is changing with applying several pulses. Figure 5 presents the evolution of the ablation volume (a) and crater morphology (b) for the action of 5 successive laser pulses at repetition rate of 10 Hz. At single-pulse irradiation, the crater volume is gradually increasing with laser fluence mainly due to its widening (Figs 2 and 3; see also Supplemental Fig. S1). In the multi-pulse regime, the crater volume increases until the breakdown threshold is reached while at higher fluences some saturation is observed (Fig. 5(a)). Interestingly, the crater deepens but not widens (compare crater diameters for 16.2 J/cm2 in Fig. 5 and 17 J/cm2 in Fig. 3). Another peculiar feature is that, at multi-pulse irradiation, the crater becomes cleaner with a smaller rim and smoother walls. This feature can be explained by the accumulation effects (defect accumulation; rapid freezing the glass matrix at a high fictive temperature which corresponds to another density and hence to another index of refraction). For the case of volumetric modification, the defect-assisted light absorption can lead to shielding of deeper material layers via creation of a confined heat-affected zone, resulting in decreased laser beam transmission38,39. A similar effect can be exhibited upon surface ablation as schematically shown in Fig. 5(c). First pulses result in creation of a rim and a strongly modified material layer at the crater bottom and walls (Fig. 5(c), middle). Next pulses are better coupling with the modified material and ablate a thinner layer (depicted by dashed line in Fig. 5(c), right), including the rim consisting from rapidly quenched material melt. The fact that, upon irradiation of fused silica by few-cycle pulses, a well-pronounced rim was observed at single-pulse irradiation19 while the rim is not seen at multiple pulse irradiation16,17, supports the conclusions made above. Note that at low energies, the 5-pulse crater has still rough walls and a well-developed rim (Fig. 5(b), left), suggesting that laser intensity is not enough to produce strong accumulation. This statement is further supported by the evolution of crater depth which grows faster with number of pulses at lower pulse energies (Fig. 5(a)). Also note that crack formation at the crater edges in Willow glass was not found, contrary to fused silica at pulse durations ≥20 fs17, that can be attributed to specific material properties such as softening points and ultimate strengths.

Figure 5. Comparing single- and multi-short laser ablation.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) The crater volume as a function of laser fluence for irradiation with one (triangles) and five (squares) pulses. (b) Craters produced by 5 laser pulses at the regimes below (left) and above (right) the breakdown threshold (pulse repetition rate is 10 Hz). (c) Schematic illustration of accumulation effects leading to cleaner crater morphology and rim disappearance with number of pulses at high laser fluences (see text).

Revisiting the model of surface ablation of transparent dielectrics

Following the laser energy balance40, the damage/ablation threshold of bandgap materials at ultrashort laser pulses is determined by levels of the density ne and the average kinetic energy Ee of free electrons reached upon irradiation. If the ne value is very high while Ee is well below the material bandgap energy, one may state on “cold ablation” through mainly scissoring the atomic bonds without considerable heating of material matrix. On the contrary, a high average kinetic energy of electrons at relatively low ne can indicate the regimes of “hot ablation” when the lattice is substantially heated upon electron-lattice thermalization and electron recombination. There are experimental evidences that, in fused silica glass near the damage/ablation threshold at ultrashort laser pulses, ne ≤ 1020 cm−3 41,42,43. On one hand, for very short laser pulses, ~100 fs and shorter, when a noticeable part of the laser energy cannot be transferred to the dielectric matrix during the pulse44, such ne levels suppose very high electron energy to fit the energy balance which would result in glass heating at least above the annealing point40. On the other hand, being estimated from pump-probe measurements, the free-electron density represents an averaged value along the laser beam propagation direction43 and the local density at the surface layer can be considerably higher. Here we address the questions on the ne and Ee values via revisiting the model of ultrashort laser excitation of dielectric materials.

The simulations have been performed for fused silica whose physical properties necessary for such modeling are reliable. Willow glass composition is unknown to us, however, it is expected that the glass contains 70–80% SiO2 as usual for borosilicate glasses. This plausibly implies formation of the defect states in silicate matrix similar to fused silica. In view of similarity in the damage thresholds of fused silica and Willow glasses (Fig. 1), we consider that the modeling-based conclusions can be applied to the latter material. The details of the model and simulations are presented in Methods and Supplementary S2.

Simulation results and discussion

The results of simulations are presented in Fig. 6. They are obtained for peak laser fluences which are twice larger than the experimentally reported average fluences. Figure 6(a,b) show the temporal evolution of the free-electron density and the electron and lattice temperatures for 4 and 5 J/cm2 (average fluences of 2 and 2.5 J/cm2). In this range of fluences, the damage threshold is usually identified for fused silica at τL = 130 fs15,17,19,45. The final lattice temperature remains below the annealing point at 4 J/cm2 while, at 5 J/cm2, it exceeds the melting point (Fig. 6(b)). In simulations, Fth = 2.27 J/cm2 is determined at which the annealing point is exceeded and signs of material compaction should be observed upon surface inspection. It is only slightly higher than the measured Fth (Fig. 1) and, hence, the model reasonably describes the damage threshold. Additionally, the calculated free-electron density fits the measured data for such fluence level43 when, according to the present simulations, the free-electron density has still a smooth profile toward the sample depth (Fig. 6(c)). With increasing fluence, strongly inhomogeneous ne profiles are produced with exceeding the critical plasma density and corresponding formation of a “mirror-like” shielding effect46. Dynamics of the laser pulse intensity entering the sample after partial reflection from the excited surface layer is presented in Fig. 6(d), demonstrating that the above-critical free-electron plasma can reduce the effective pulse duration. Note that the instantaneous reflection coefficient was calculated according the multilayer reflectivity model36.

Figure 6. Modeling results on the temporal dynamics of glass excitation and heating.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) Temporal evolution of the electron density on the surface of a fused silica sample for two laser fluences. The simulated fluences of 4 and 5 J/cm2 correspond to the average laser fluences, 2 and 2.5 J/cm2 respectively. (b) The electron and lattice temperature dynamics for the same laser fluences as in (a). At 4 J/cm2, the lattice remains relatively cold, below the annealing point. At 5 J/cm2, the lattice is heated above the melting temperature of 2006 K. (c) The spatial profiles of the free-electron density at time moments of 100 fs after the laser pulse maximum. (d) Dynamic change in the laser intensity of the beam entering the sample after its partial reflection from the laser-excited surface layer, (1 − R(t)) × I0(t) where I0(t) and R(t)) are respectively the incident laser intensity (black solid line) and the time-dependent reflection coeffisient. All data are presented for peak laser fluences.

While the lattice temperature and the free-electron population look to be reliable, extremely high electron energies (Fig. 6(b)) can raise some doubts. Rather low electron densities generated at fluences near Fth (Fig. 6(a)) require high electron energies in order the absorbed laser energy could bring material toward the damage. Furthermore, at higher fluences, though the free-electron density increases above 1020 cm−3, the electron energy also further increases. Thus at 8 J/cm2 (average fluence of 4 J/cm2), the maximum electron density is already 1.3 × 1021 cm−3 (Fig. 6(c)) while the electron energy approaches 100 eV that, however, agrees with the energy of photoelectrons observed at similar laser fluences37. It should be commented that, in the fluence range applied in simulations (up to 16 J/cm2 that corresponds to the average fluence of 8 J/cm2), the role of collisional ionization (see Eq. (S5) in Supplementary S2) is rather small. According to modeling, the photoionization process essentially determines electron excitation across the band gap during the laser pulse that is in line with earlier reported results37,47. However, after the laser pulse, continuing collisional ionization is somewhat suppressing the rate of the free-electron population decay (Fig. 6(a)).

The above-critical “plasma shield” can extend up to 100 nm toward the target (Fig. 6(c)) where the material experiences extremely fast heating toward a hundred thousand Kelvin at 16 J/cm2. Such strong heating is sufficient for complete atomization of glass matrix bonds and, additionally, for partial ionization. If to assume that it is feasible, two mechanisms can be responsible for material ablation. As discussed in Section III, in the middle of the irradiation spot where light absorption is largest, Coulomb explosion is highly probable due to energetic electrons escaping from a surface layer and leaving behind a high positive charge35,36. On the other hand, fast atomization/dissociation of covalently bonded glass matrix has to happen due to rapid lattice heating above the critical thermodynamic temperature33. These mechanisms can coexist at high laser intensities though their manifestation can be separated in time with charge-induced emission of ions happening first. As discussed above, swift atomization can be a reason for formation “a crater within the initial crater” via transient suppressing of phase explosion in the hottest middle part of the irradiation spot.

It should be commented that prediction of the ablation depth and crater shape/volume can only be very speculative for the studied conditions. Numerous factors and physical processes must be taken into account: several ablation mechanisms, including phase explosion that implies material ejection in the form of micro/nanoparticles and associated uncertainty in the latent heat of ablation/sublimation of such species; recoil pressure which can either partially suppress or delay the ablation process and, additionally, lead to material relocation within the crater; unknown changes in material properties under heating to extreme thermodynamic conditions, etc. Although modeling results on the spatial profiles of the lattice temperature are in a reasonable agreement with the observed crater depth when accounting for the sublimation energy, we leave this question for further studies.

Extremely high energy of free electrons can result in appearance of luminous plasma lightning that was observed experimentally12,13,14,16. Bremsstrahlung radiation can be roughly estimated by a classical expression24

graphic file with name srep39133-m1.jpg

Here the electron and ion densities (ni = ne in the case considered here) are measured in cm−3 and the electron temperature is in eV. According to Eq. (1), plasma luminescence is governed mostly by its density and, to a smaller extent, by the electron temperature. Figure 7 presents the evolutions of the maximum free-electron density (a) and the bremsstrahlung signal integrated over time (b). We limited simulations by 16 J/cm2 (8 J/cm2 of average fluence) for two reasons. First, multiphoton ionization must give way to the tunneling mechanism at such fluences. Second, the role of air ionization already becomes noticeable at such fluences that does not allow to directly compare with the experimental results obtained under the air conditions (the detailed study of the role of air ionization under these particular conditions will be published elsewhere). According to simulations, the critical electron density is achieved in the middle of the irradiation spot at ~4.2 J/cm2 (Fig. 7(a)). At such fluence values, the electron population profile is already substantially inhomogeneous (Fig. 6(c)) in the direction to the sample depth and, hence, direct evaluation of the electron density from pump-probe measurements is already problematic43.

Figure 7. Calculated data on the levels of free-electron density and bremsstrahlung emission.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

(a) The calculated maximum density of free electrons in the center of the irradiation spot on fused silica surface under the action of a 130-fs 800-nm laser pulse as a function of average laser fluence. (b) Time-integrated bremsstrahlung emission intensity from the central point of the irradiation spot calculated by Eq. (9) as a function of average laser fluence. The calculated damage threshold and the fluence at which the critical electron density is reached are shown by straight lines. Note that in simulations the fluence was doubled to correspond to the experimental peak fluence. Here the data are presented for average laser fluences.

Due to a swift increase of the free-electron density with fluence, the time-integrated bremsstrahlung emission from the central point of the irradiation spot increases by app. 3.5 orders of magnitude in the fluence range from Fth to the achieving the critical electron density (Fig. 7(b)). Note that the space integration of bremsstrahlung emission has not been carried out in the present simulations which would further increase the difference in bremsstrahlung signals for low and high fluences. Although some bremsstrahlung emission has to occur as soon as plasma is produced, its detection is determined by the detector sensitivity as noticed by Varel et al.14. However, we consider that a good concurrence of the thresholds measured in this work with those reported in refs 12, 13, 15 and 19 cannot be occasional, pointing to grasping the physical mechanisms of the studied phenomena.

As a whole, the damage threshold of transparent solids is more deterministic than FOB as it is connected with certain values of material physical properties (softening/annealing point, melting point, yield or fracture strength)48. If such a value is achieved, the irradiated material changes abruptly its structure/phase and/or massively ablated, e.g. through mechanical fracture. The difference in Fth for transparent dielectrics at single ultrashort laser pulses of a certain wavelength is mainly conditioned by the difference in the band gap (and, hence, the photo-ionization rate), annealing or melting points, as well as heat capacity. The same damage threshold for fused silica and Willow glass points that the locally absorbed energy in both materials has brought them to the state at least above the annealing point.

Detection of FOB is related to bremsstrahlung emission whose intensity is determined by the density and temperature of free-electron “gas”. Hence, some emission can appear as soon as free electrons have been generated. As mentioned above, the breakdown detection is connected with the detection system sensitivity, involving a spectral range of a spectroscopic device or sensitivity of a photodiode. Difference in sensitivity/spectral ranges can be a plausible explanation of the large difference in the measured breakdown thresholds12,13,14.

It should be stressed that the free-electron populations at pico- and femtosecond laser pulses must have different average energies at the same level of laser fluence. This fact inevitably results in a relative shift of the spectral maxima of bremsstrahlung emission that can further affect the accuracy of FOB detection. Besides of the spectral shift, a decrease in FOB with shortening τL below ~100 fs13,14 can be attributed to multiphoton intraband transitions (multiphoton absorption of light by free electrons)49. The latter process has not been involved in the reported simulations but can become important at increased laser intensities.

At large energies of free electrons reported here, Coulomb explosion looks to be an inevitable mechanism of ablation. However, as soon as a part of energetic free electrons escapes to vacuum, the conduction band of the excited dielectric material cannot be considered anymore as located at near-vacuum level due to the build-up of a high surface potential, preventing further electrons to escape from the surface50. Additionally, at high electron densities reached with increasing laser fluence (Fig. 7(a)), the Debye length is extremely small that can suppress electrostatic disintegration of the surface layer.

Conclusions

In this paper, we have made attempts to establish connections between the thresholds and mechanisms of damage and white-light generation upon femtosecond laser irradiation of wide-bandgap transparent materials. On the example of Corning Willow glass, evolution of ablation craters, their quality, and white-light emission were studied experimentally for 130-fs, 800-nm laser pulses. To gain insight into the processes triggered by laser radiation in glass, numerical simulations have been performed, taking into account bremsstrahlung emission from excited free-electron plasma. The results of this comprehensive study have led to the following conclusions:

  • The determined breakdown threshold for Corning Willow glass is considerably higher than the damage threshold in the studied irradiation regimes.

  • The evolution of the ablation crater shape and morphology points to co-existence of several ablation mechanisms which can be separated in time. The “crater-inside-crater” shape whose appearance is coincident with FOB can be explained by suppression of phase explosion in the middle of the irradiation spot by swiftly atomized external layer of irradiated material.

  • At high laser fluences, air ionization strongly influences ablation rate and quality. The main mechanisms of influence can be re-radiation of air plasma upon its recombination, scattering the tail part of the laser beam by air plasma created by the beam front, and shock wave propagating from the region of ionized air, which can etch the sample surface in contact areas.

  • Multi-pulse ablation at moderate laser fluences can lead to improvement of crater quality as compared to single pulses.

  • Simulations have revealed that the generated free electrons can have very high average energy starting from Fth.

  • Simulated temperature dynamics of the lattice indicates that rapid atomization of external target layer can happen at fluences near FOB due to swift transfer of energy from the electronic subsystem which is sufficient for scissoring chemical bonds of dielectric matrix.

Obtained results and performed analysis has enabled to clarify a number of effects observed upon glass ablation but also added new questions which call for further studies.

Methods

Laser ablation experiments

The scheme of laser ablation experiments is shown in Fig. 8. Laser ablation of glass was performed by Ti: Sapphire fs-laser amplifier (Coherent, Legend Elite fs-laser series, 800 nm) that is capable to produce 4 mJ pulses with pulse duration of ∼130 fs at maximum repetition rate of 1 kHz. The laser energy on the target surface was controlled by a combination of a half-wave plate and a polarizing beam splitter. The Corning Willow glass samples ~100 μm thick were positioned on the XYZ motorized stage. Prior to irradiation, the samples were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath with acetone and isopropanol. The laser beam was focused on the sample surface with a plano-convex lens of 10 cm focal length. The beam waist at focus was measured using a traditional technique51 that yielded the beam waist diameter (1/e2) at focus of ∼24.5 μm. All experiments have been performed in air under atmospheric conditions.

Figure 8. Schematics of the experimental setup.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Optical emission measurements

The early stage optical emission spectroscopy was performed using a Czerny-Turner spectrometer with a focal length of 163 mm (Andor DH334T-18U-63 ICCD, quantum efficiency of the intensifier in the range of the measured spectra is between 30–47%). The emission was imaged on the spectrometer slit (3 mm × 50 μm) using an achromatic fused silica lens with an overall demagnification of ∼2.5. The emission intensity at the output of spectrometer was recorded as a function of wavelength with the help of a fast ICCD camera (Andor, iStar DH334T ICCD) with a minimum temporal resolution of 3 ns. The ICCD matrix consisted of 1024 × 1024 pixels each with size of 13 × 13 μm2. The time delay between the laser pulse and the measurement with the minimum observation gate was adjusted using built-in delay generator of the ICCD. The ICCD was externally triggered by the TTL pulse from the laser system. It was ensured that only emission from free-electron plasma in the sample was recorded, avoiding a contribution from the ablation plasma. The optical emission for a certain laser fluence was recorded for 50 laser shots. The velocity of the translation stage was adjusted to avoid overlapping of individual irradiation spots. The optical breakdown threshold was detected as in the work by Li et al.20 by change of the slope of the integral emission intensity with increasing laser fluence.

Analysis of crater morphology

The single-shot ablation craters produced on the target surface at different laser fluences were studied by scanning confocal laser microscope (Olympus LEXT, OLS 3100). The detailed crater morphology was analysed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) operating in tapping mode (Bruker, Dimension Icon ambient AFM in peak force modulation with a tip diameter ≤10 nm). The damage threshold was identified by linear regression of crater volume as a function of fluence from AFM measurements, see Fig. 5. Below this threshold fluence, no visible signs of laser-induced changes were found by microscopy inspection.

Numerical modeling of laser interaction with fused silica glass

The details of the model equations are given in Supplementary Material (S2). In brief, the one-dimensional model consists of the rate equations describing generation of free electrons and excitons, calculations of the evolving dielectric function of material with swiftly developing electron plasma for determining spatiotemporal dynamics of the coefficients of reflection and absorption, and the heat equations in the form of the two-temperature model (TTM). When considering the TTM, we are aware that, at fs laser pulse timescales, thermal equilibrium within the electron subsystem can occur to be unachievable by the end of the laser pulse44. Hence, the free-electron temperature is treated as a measure of the average electron energy. The detailed sets of the model equations can also be found elsewhere36,52.

For numerical solving the model equations, the finite-difference implicit scheme was used with application of the Thomas algorithm. Numerical grid was regular at the surface layer of 500 nm with the spatial step of 0.5 nm. Deeper to the sample, the spatial step was increased by geometrical progression with the factor of 1.01. The time step of 10−17 s secured convergence, accurate solution, and reasonable runtimes.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Mirza, I. et al. Ultrashort pulse laser ablation of dielectrics: Thresholds, mechanisms, role of breakdown. Sci. Rep. 6, 39133; doi: 10.1038/srep39133 (2016).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep39133-s1.pdf (348.9KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

I.M., N.M.B., and T.M. greatly acknowledge support of the state budget of the Czech Republic (project HiLASE grants LO1602 and LM2015086). O.H. acknowledges the support by the project LO1305. Contribution of L.F. was supported in the frames of the Prague Competitiveness Operational Programme (project FUNBIO, No. CZ.2.16/3.1.00/21568; LO1409 and LM2015088) and by the MEYS project SAFMAT grants LM2015088 and LO1409. J.T. acknowledges the internal grant of Palacký University No. IGA_PrF_2016_002. The authors thank D. Rostohar for providing Willow glass samples and useful discussions.

Footnotes

Author Contributions I.M., N.M.B., and T.M. designed the research. I.M., J.T., V.M., and O.H. carried out the experiments and analysed the data. L.F. designed the detailed crater measurements. N.M.B. developed the model and performed simulations. N.M.B. and I.M. wrote the manuscript; all authors contributed to the scientific discussion and revised the manuscript.

References

  1. Gattass R. R. & Mazur E. Femtosecond laser micromachining in transparent materials. Nat. Photon. 2, 219–225 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  2. Bäuerle D. W. Laser Processing and Chemistry. 4th edn, (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. Sugioka K. & Cheng Y. (Ed.) Ultrafast Laser Processing: From Micro- to Nanoscale (Pan Stanford, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  4. Thakur P., Tan B. & Venkatakrishnan K. Multi-phase functionalization of titanium for enhanced photon absorption in the vis-NIR region. Sci. Reports 5, 15354 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kerse C. et al. Ablation-cooled material removal with ultrafast bursts of pulses. Nature, 537, 84–88 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chichkov B. N., Momma C., Nolte S., von Alvensleben F. & Tünnermann A. Femtosecond, picosecond and nanosecond laser ablation of solids. Appl. Phys. A 63, 109–115 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  7. Sugioka K. & Cheng Y. Ultrafast lasers-reliable tools for advanced materials processing. Light: Sci. Appl. 3, e149 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  8. LaHaye N. L., Kurian J., Diwakar P. K., Alff L. & Harilal S. S. Femtosecond laser ablation-based mass spectrometry: An ideal tool for stoichiometric analysis of thin films. Sci. Reports 5, 13121 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Malinauskas M. et al. Ultrafast laser processing of materials: from science to industry, Light: Sci. Appl. 5, e16133, doi: 10.1038/lsa.2016.133 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barik A. R., Bapna M., Drabold D. A. & Adarsh K. V. Ultrafast light induced unusually broad transient absorption in the sub-bandgap region of GeSe2 thin film. Sci. Reports 4, 3686 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Batavičiūtė G., Ščiuka M. & Melninkaitis A. Direct comparison of defect ensembles extracted from damage probability and raster scan measurements. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 105306 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  12. Du D., Liu X., Korn G., Squier J. & Mourou G. Laser‐induced breakdown by impact ionization in SiO2 with pulse widths from 7 ns to 150 fs. Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 3071–3073 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  13. Du D., Liu X. & Mourou G. Reduction of multi-photon ionization in dielectrics due to collisions. Appl. Phys. B 63, 617–621 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  14. Varel H. et al. Laser-induced damage in SiO2 and CaF2 with picosecond and femtosecond laser pulses. Appl. Phys. A 62, 293–294 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  15. Stuart B. C. et al. Nanosecond-to-femtosecond laser-induced breakdown in dielectrics. Phys. Rev. B 53, 1749–1761 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lenzner M. et al. Femtosecond optical breakdown in dielectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4076–4079 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  17. Lenzner M., Krausz F., Krüger J. & Kautek W. Photoablation with sub-10 fs laser pulses. Appl. Surf. Sci. 154–155, 11–16 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  18. De Jong B. H. W. S., Beerkens R. G. C., van Nijnatten P. A. & Le Bouhis E. Glass, 1. Fundamentals In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 1–54 (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA), 10.1002/14356007.a12_365.pub3 (2000). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lebugle M., Sanner N., Utéza O. & Sentis M. Guidelines for efficient direct ablation of dielectrics with single femtosecond pulses. Appl. Phys. A 114, 129–142 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  20. Li M., Menon S., Nibarger J. P. & Gibson G. N. Ultrafast electron dynamics in femtosecond optical breakdown of dielectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2394–2397 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  21. Weingarten K. High Energy Picosecond lasers: Ready for prime time. Laser Tech. J. 6, 51–54, doi: 10.1002/latj.200990041 (2009). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. CORNING Willow® Glass. Fact Sheet. http://www.corning.com/media/worldwide/cdt/documents/Willow_2014_fact_sheet.pdf., (Date of access: 15/08/2016) (2016).
  23. Marshall G. F. & Stutz G. E. (Ed.) Handbook of Optical and Laser Scanning. 2nd edn, 788 (CRC Press, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  24. Bulgakova N. M. et al. Impacts of ambient and ablation plasmas on short- and ultrashort-pulse laser processing of surfaces. Micromachines 5, 1344–1372 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  25. Bulgakova N. M., Zhukov V. P., Vorobyev A. Y. & Guo C. Modeling of residual thermal effect in femtosecond laser ablation of metals: role of a gas environment. Appl. Phys. A 92, 883–889 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  26. Martirosyan A. E. et al. Time evolution of plasma afterglow produced by femtosecond laser pulses. J. Appl. Phys. 96, 5450–5455 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  27. Bulgakova N. M., Evtushenko A. B., Shukhov Y. G., Kudryashov S. I. & Bulgakov A. V. Role of laser-induced plasma in ultradeep drilling of materials by nanosecond laser pulses. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 10876–10882 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  28. Klimentov S. M. et al. Effect of nonlinear light scattering in air on ablation of materials produced by femtosecond laser pulses. Quantum Electron. 32, 433–436 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  29. Karim E. T., Wu C. & Zhigilei L. V. Molecular dynamics simulations of laser-materials interactions: General and material-specific mechanisms of material removal and generation of crystal defects In Fundamentals of Laser-Assisted Micro- and Nanotechnologies, Springer Series in Materials Science, Vol. 195 (eds Veiko V. P. & Konov V. I.) 27–49 (Springer International Publishing), doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05987-7_2 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Skripov V. P. Metastable liquids (John Wiley, 1974). [Google Scholar]
  31. Miotello A. & Kelly R. Laser-induced phase explosion: new physical problems when a condensed phase approaches the thermodynamic critical temperature. Appl. Phys. A 69, S67–S73 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  32. Bulgakova N. M. & Bulgakov A. V. Pulsed laser ablation of solids: transition from normal vaporization to phase explosion. Appl. Phys. A 73, 199–208 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  33. Wu C. & Zhigilei L. V. Microscopic mechanisms of laser spallation and ablation of metal targets from large-scale molecular dynamics simulations. Appl. Phys. A 114, 11–32 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  34. Körner C., Mayerhofer R., Hartmann M. & Bergmann H. W. Physical and material aspects in using visible laser pulses of nanosecond duration for ablation. Appl. Phys. A 63, 123–131 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  35. Stoian R. et al. Surface charging and impulsive ion ejection during ultrashort pulsed laser ablation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 097603 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bulgakova N. M., Stoian R., Rosenfeld A., Hertel I. V. & Campbell E. E. B. Electronic transport and consequences for material removal in ultrafast pulsed laser ablation of materials. Phys. Rev. B 69, 054102 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  37. Geoffroy G., Duchateau G., Fedorov N., Martin P. & Guizard S. Influence of electron Coulomb explosion on photoelectron spectra of dielectrics irradiated by femtosecond laser pulses. Laser Phys. 24, 086101 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  38. Bulgakova N. M. et al. Pulsed laser modification of transparent dielectrics: what can be foreseen and predicted by numerical simulations? J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 31, C8–C14 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  39. Grojo D. et al. Exciton-seeded multiphoton ionization in bulk SiO2. Physical Review B 81, 212301 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  40. Bulgakova N. M., Zhukov V. P., Sonina S. V. & Meshcheryakov Y. P. Modification of transparent materials with ultrashort laser pulses: What is energetically and mechanically meaningful? J. Appl. Phys. 118, 233108 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  41. Quéré F., Guizard S. & Martin P. Time-resolved study of laser-induced breakdown in dielectrics. EPL 56, 138–144, doi: 10.1209/epl/i2001-00499-9 (2001). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mao S. S. et al. Dynamics of femtosecond laser interactions with dielectrics. Appl. Phys. A 79, 1695–1709 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  43. Temnov V. V., Sokolowski-Tinten K., Zhou P., El-Khamhawy A. & von der Linde D. Multiphoton ionization in dielectrics: Comparison of circular and linear polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 237403 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kaiser A., Rethfeld B., Vicanek M. & Simon G. Microscopic processes in dielectrics under irradiation by subpicosecond laser pulses. Phys. Rev. B 61, 11437–11450 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  45. Tien A.-C., Backus S., Kapteyn H., Murnane M. & Mourou G. Short-pulse laser damage in transparent materials as a function of pulse duration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3883–3886 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  46. Varkentina N., Sanner N., Lebugle M., Sentis M. & Utéza O. Absorption of a single 500 fs laser pulse at the surface of fused silica: Energy balance and ablation efficiency. J. Appl. Phys. 114, 173105 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu A. Q., Chowdhury I. H. & Xu X. Femtosecond laser absorption in fused silica: Numerical and experimental investigation. Phys. Rev. B 72, 085128 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  48. Chimier B. et al. Damage and ablation thresholds of fused-silica in femtosecond regime. Phys. Rev. B 84, 094104 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  49. Bachau H. et al. Electron heating through a set of random levels in the conduction band of insulators induced by femtosecond laser pulses. Appl. Phys. A 98, 679–689 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  50. Riffe D. M. et al. Femtosecond thermionic emission from metals in the space-charge-limited regime. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 1424–1435 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu J. M. Simple technique for measurements of pulsed Gaussian-beam spot sizes. Opt. Lett. 7, 196–198 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Bulgakova N. M. et al. Ultrashort-pulse laser processing of transparent materials: insight from numerical and semi-analytical models. SPIE Proc. 9735, 97350N, 10.1117/12.2217585 (2016). [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep39133-s1.pdf (348.9KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES