Skip to main content
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics logoLink to Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
. 2016 Nov 28;2(2):77–83. doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(04)02013-3

Microarray and Proteomic Analysis of Brassinosteroid- and Gibberellin-Regulated Gene and Protein Expression in Rice

Guangxiao Yang 1, Setsuko Komatsu 1,*
PMCID: PMC5172446  PMID: 15629047

Abstract

Brassinosteroid (BR) and gibberellin (GA) are two groups of plant growth regulators essential for normal plant growth and development. To gain insight into the molecular mechanism by which BR and GA regulate the growth and development of plants, especially the monocot plant rice, it is necessary to identify and analyze more genes and proteins that are regulated by them. With the availability of draft sequences of two major types, japonica and indica rice, it has become possible to analyze expression changes of genes and proteins at genome scale. In this review, we summarize rice functional genomic research by using microarray and proteomic approaches and our recent research results focusing on the comparison of cDNA microarray and proteomic analyses of BR- and GA-regulated gene and protein expression in rice. We believe our findings have important implications for understanding the mechanism by which BR and GA regulate the growth and development of rice.

Key words: brassinosteroid, gibberellin, microarray, proteome, rice

Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important crop in eastern Asia; it is also widely accepted as a good model for the studies of monocot plants because of its small genome (430 Mb), well-established protocols for transformation and high degrees of synteny among other crop plants of Poaceae species (1). With the publication of draft sequences of Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica and japonica genomes 2., 3. and completion of sequencing of chromosomes 1 and 4 by IRGSP 4., 5., we have entered into an era of functional genomics in the research on rice. Functional genomics can be considered as any technique or approach that identifies gene function and/or the role of a gene in plant biology 6., 7.. Knowing the exact sequence and location of all genes of a given organism is only the first step towards understanding how all parts of a biological system work together. Although 25,426 genes have been identified in Arabidopsis, less than 10% have been documented experimentally (8). Rice genome is predicted to have approximately 50,000 to 55,000 protein-coding genes 2., 3.. About 76% of the 28 Kb full-length rice cDNA clones could be assigned tentative function by gene ontology term (9). However, gene function predication by sequence comparison will not always lead to conclusive results. Knowing the class of protein that a gene belongs to does not immediately tell us the exact function of a gene. For example, in the Arabidopsis genome, at least 610 genes have been identified as encoding leucine-rich-repeat class of receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLKs), but only a few of their biological functions have been determined (10). Therefore, the gene function must be inferred by analyzing the phenotype of mutant and by studying the expression of the gene in question over the course of developmental process or in response to certain biotic and abiotic stimuli.

To assign function to unknown genes, different functional genomic methodologies, which are termed phenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics, are currently being developed and used (6). We have been systematically analyzing changes induced by the phytohormones brassinosteroid (BR) and gibberellin (GA) both at transcriptional and translational levels in rice seedlings by using cDNA microarray and proteomic approaches. In this review, we summarize rice functional genomic research by using microarray and proteomic approaches and our recent research results focusing on the comparison of cDNA microarray and proteomic analyses of BR- and GA-regulated gene and protein expression in rice.

Rice Functional Genomic Research by Microarray and Proteomic Approaches

Transcriptional profiling using microarray has developed into the most prominent tool for functional genomics. Changes in mRNA abundance, which are related to changes in protein levels, are indicative of changes in environmental and developmental program or reflect response to all kinds of stimuli. In the past few years, although research on expression profiling in rice was quite limited in contrast to Arabidopsis, microarray analyses in rice have approached various biological questions such as grain filling (11), pollination and fertilization (12), responses to biotic (13) and abiotic stresses 14., 15., and phytohormones 16., 17. by interrogating an increasing number of genes. Proteomics seeks to measure the expression of all proteins within an organism and monitor changes in response to developmental and environmental cues. In principal, variations between protein patterns are either due to differences in gene expression levels modulating protein concentrations, or may result from post-translational modifications, which change the structural properties of proteins. In rice, several studies dealt with the construction of proteome at cell, tissue and whole plant levels 18., 19., and analyses of defense-associated response, blast fungus infection of rice grown under different levels of nitrogen fertilization have been published (19). As a part of Rice Genome Research Project of NIAS, Japan, the rice cDNA microarray and proteome databases are now available to the public (http://microarray.rice.dna.affrc.go.jp and http://gene64.dna.affrc.go.jp/RPD). Currently, rice cDNA microarray has 9,000 unique ESTs and 28 Kb full-length cDNA versions. Recently, a high-density rice array is available to the public (http://www.ricearray.org). Around 11,941 identified protein spots corresponding to 4,180 separate protein entries have been deposited in the database (19). The information on amino acid sequences is updated weekly.

Molecular Mechanism of Brassinosteroid and Gibberellin Actions

BR and GA are two groups of plant growth regulators essential for normal plant growth and development 20., 21.. While rapid progress has been made in studies of the biosynthetic pathways, metabolism and signaling of BR (22) and GA (23) using biochemical techniques as well as by the characterization of their biosynthetic mutants in Arabidopsis, not much is known about how they regulate the wide variety of physiological processes at the molecular levels. It is now believed that the binding of BR and its receptor BRI1 at cell membrane will lead to inactivation of a negative regulator BIN2, and the inactivated BIN2 allows the unphosphorylated BES1 and BZR1 to accumulate and move to the nucleus where they activate target genes transcription (24). Several important positive and negative regulastors of GA signaling have also been identified. The DELLA proteins function as negative regulator of GA signaling, and their degradation through the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway is considered as a key event in the regulation of GA-stimulated processes (25). GA is believed to bind to an unidentified receptor and activates G proteins that enhance the GA signaling. As a consequence, PHOR1 is translocated into the uncleus, where it acts as a positive regulator. GA signal also activates protein kinase and GID2/SLY1-mediated degradation of DELLA protein SLR1/RGA, which otherwise inhibits the expression of GA-induced genes (25).

Major effects of BR and GA on plant growth and development are mediated through gene expression modulation because RNA and protein synthesis inhibitors interfere with these processes. To further understand the molecular mechanism of BR and GA actions, especially in monocot rice, it is necessary to identify and analyze more genes that are controlled by them, and characterization of individual gene will help us to understand how BR and GA regulate the growth and development of plants.

Brassinosteroid-Regulated Gene and Protein Expression in Rice

Recent studies have proven that BR plays an essential role in rice growth and development 26., 27., 28., but there is still no report on BR-regulated gene and protein expression in rice. The bending of the second leaf and its leaf sheath (lamina joint) in rice is very sensitive to the concentration of BR. This unique characteristic of rice leaves has been used as a quantitative bioassay for BR 29., 30.. Initially, we adopted this model system for analyzing BR effect on the changes of gene and protein expression.

Microarray analysis of brassinosteroid-regulated gene expression

First, a cDNA microarray containing 1,265 independent rice genes arrayed in duplicates that were randomly selected from 9,000 ESTs was used to analyze differential gene expression in lamina joint tissue caused by brassinolide (BL), the most active form of BR (31). Twelve clones were found to be up-regulated after 1 μM BL treatment for 24 h (Table 1). Among them, 5 clones had homologies based on the search in GenBank database using the BLAST program. A vacuolar H+-transporting ATPase homologue showed higher expression in the BL-treated lamina joint, suggesting a role in BL-mediated cell expansion. One clone showed homology to a sorghum mRNA for ACC oxidase-related protein. Clone 97 was a putative kinetochore protein homologue, a protein involved in mitosis machinery. Clones 165 and 250 were homologous to the Arabidopsis p23 co-chaperon and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme respectively, which are involved in protein metabolism. The other 7 clones had no significant homologies in the database (31). Second, to enrich the BR-induced genes, a cDNA library was constructed with mRNAs isolated from seedlings treated with BL. A microarray containing 4,000 clones randomly selected from this library was analyzed with an aim to identify new genes that exhibit transcription regulation by BR. This time, we were able to identify another nine new BL-up-regulated genes and 32 BL-down-regulated genes (16).

Table 1.

BL-up-Regulated Genes in Rice Lamina Joint

Clone No. Putative gene identification Accession No.
67 Unknown AU077480
97 mRNA for putative kinetochore protein AU068983
145 Vacuolar H+-transporting ATPase AU085745
165 mRNA for p23 co-chaperon AU069113
203 Unknown AU063127
214 Unknown C97224
250 Ubiquitin conjugating enzyme C97278
550 Unknown AU082386
654 Unknown AU085926
973 Unknown AU088678
1029 ACC oxidase related protein AU032762
1190 Unknown AU175763

Two novel BL-up-regulated genes OsBLE1 and OsBLE2 identified from our first time microarray analysis were selected for detailed characterization. OsBLE1 is a small protein with 81 amino acid residues while OsBLE2 encodes a predicted polypeptide of 761 amino acid residues and nine possible transmembrane regions. OsBLE2 expression was most responsive to BL in the lamina joint and leaf sheath in rice seedlings. BL did not enhance its expression in transgenic rice expressing antisense BRI1, a BR receptor, indicating that BR signaling to the enhanced expression of OsBLE2 is through BRI1. BL effect in the d1 mutant rice was much weaker than that in its wild type control, suggesting that heterotrimeric Gα protein may be a component of BR signaling. Transgenic rice expressing antisense OsBLE1 and OsBLE2 exhibits various degrees of repressed growth. Our results demonstrated that OsBLE1 and OsBLE2 play important roles in BL-regulated growth processes in rice 31., 32..

Proteomic analysis of proteins regulated by brassinosteroid

Proteins extracted from lamina joints that had been treated with 1 μM BL and water control for 48 h were separated and compared by 2D-PAGE followed by amino acid analysis (33). Eight protein spots representing seven kinds of proteins were increased in quantity in lamina joints treated with BL when compared to water control. These proteins are tubulin, glyceroaldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Spot 417), homeodomain leucine zipper protein (Spot 528), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (Spot 566), Pyruvate decarboxylase 1 (Spot 591), glutathione S-transferase (Spot 595), and RuBisCO LSU (Spots 738 and 742), which fall into categories of transcription factor, cell structure, metabolism, photosynthesis, and stress response (Table 2). This result suggests that BL has wide range of influence on many cellular processes through regulating expression of different proteins.

Table 2.

BL-up-Regulated Proteins in Rice Lamina Joint

Spot No. Homologous protein Accession No.
384 Tubulin AF030548
417 Glyceroaldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase Q59800
528 Homeodomain leucine zipper protein AF145727
566 Dihydroflavonol 4-reductase AB003496
591 Pyruvate decarboxylase I U07339
595 Glutathione S-transferase P31671
738 RuBisCO LSU P30828
742 RuBisCO LSU P30828

Gibberellin-Regulated Gene and Protein Expression in Rice

Regulation of rice plant height is important for lodging resistance and thus improving grain yield. GA is one of the major factors determining plant height including monocot rice. However, the mechanism of how GA regulates this process remained unclear. Rice seedlings leaf sheath is very sensitive to GA, and two-week-old rice treated with 5 μM GA3 for 48 h elongated twice in length (34). We used this system to analyze GA-regulated changes in gene and protein expression.

Microarray analysis of gibberellin-regulated gene expression

A cDNA microarray containing 9,000 independent rice ESTs was used to analyze differential gene expression in leaf sheath treated by GA3. Seventeen genes were up-regulated after 5 μM GA treatment for 12 h (Table 3). Among them, the functions of four clones were unknown. The other 13 genes encode various proteins involved in many cellular processes. Glyceroaldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Clone 1404) and malate dehydrogenase (Clone 1421) are two important enzymes in carbon metabolism. Components of cytoskeleton including actin (Clone 5820) and tubulin (Clone 216) were also up-regulated by GA3. The Golgi COPI coatomer components (Clones 5887 and 6364) are proteins involved in intracellular protein trafficking process while NADH dehydrogenase (Clone 1459) and cytochrome C (Clone 1710) are the members of mitochondrial electron transport chain. Other GA3-up-regulated genes that were identified in this microarray analysis encode protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit A (Clone 1298), mitochondrial 2-oxoglutarate/malate translocator (Clone 1390), topoisomerase IV subunit A (Clone 6175), adenylate kinase A (Clone 5951) and farnesyl diphosphate synthase (Clone 1644) (35).

Table 3.

GA3-up-Regulated Genes in Rice Leaf Sheath

Clone No. Putative gene identification Accession No.
216 Tubulin AU102148
1173 Unknown C96918
1298 Protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit A AU166798
1386 Unknown AU108788
1390 Mitochondrial 2-oxoglutarate/malate translocator AU176430
1404 Glyceroaldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase AU108826
1421 Malate dehydrogenase AU092479
1459 NADH dehydrogenase AU100811
1644 Farnesyl diphosphate synthase C27703
1710 Cytochrome C AU100900
5820 actin AU164488
5887 COP alpha AU031660
5951 Adenylate kinase A D23938
6236 Unknown AU031768
6175 Topoisomerase IV subunit A AU173178
6237 Unknown AU173243
6364 Coatomer complex subunit AU031850

We also used a cDNA microarray containing 4,000 clones randomly selected from a rice cDNA library prepared from seedlings treated with GA3 to analyze gene expression differences caused by GA3 in rice seedlings. Twenty-nine and forty-two unique cDNA clones were found up- and down-regulated by GA3 this time, respectively (16). Four clones encoding the same isotype of xyloglucan endotransglucosylases/hydrolases (XTHs) were GA3-up-regulated. XTHs are encoded by a gene family of 29 members in rice (36) and mediate the cleavage and rejoining of the β-(1-4)-xyloglucans of the primary cell wall. It is considered that XTHs play an important role in the construction and restructuring of xyloglucan cross-links and thus are essential for regulating cell elongation. The GA3-up-regulated XTH identified here was designated OsXTH8, cloned and characterized. OsXTH8 was preferentially expressed in rice leaf sheath in response to GA3. In situ hybridization and OsXTH8 promoter GUS fusion analysis revealed that OsXTH8 was highly expressed in vascular bundles of leaf sheath and young nodal roots, where the cells are actively undergoing elongation and differentiation. OsXTH8 gene expression was specifically up-regulated by GA3. In two genetic mutants of rice with abnormal height, the expression of OsXTH8 positively correlated with the height of the mutants. Transgenic rice expressing an RNAi construct of OsXTH8 exhibited repressed growth. These results indicate that OsXTH8 is differentially expressed in rice in relation to GA and potentially involved in cell elongation processes (37).

Proteomic analysis of proteins regulated by GA3

Proteins extracted from leaf sheath that had been treated with 5 μM GA3 and water control for 48 h were separated and compared by 2D-PAGE followed by amino acid analysis (34). A total of 21 protein spots representing 18 kinds of proteins were increased in quantity in leaf sheath treated with GA3 when compared to water control. Among them, seven proteins did not have homologies or only hit to hypothetical proteins in the database (Table 4). These identified proteins include phosphatidylinositol 4 kinase (Spot 004), Calcium binding protein (Spot 006), lumental binding protein (Spots 030 and 034), calreticulin (Spot 079), β-tubulin (Spot 089), RuBisCO LSU (Spots 093 and 094), RuBsCO activase (Spots 129 and 162), tetraphosphate phosphorylase II (Spot 239), ascorbate peroxidase (Spot 278), GSH-dependent dehydroascorbate reductase (Spot 309), and histone HI (Spot 313).

Table 4.

GA3-up-Regulated Proteins in Rice Leaf Sheath

Spot No. Homologous protein Accession No.
004 Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase AAK18831
005 Unknown
006 Hypothetical protein BAA95862
008 Calcium-binding protein 1 P42529
030 Lumental binding protein AAB63469
034 Lumental binding protein AAB63469
056 Unknown
079 Calreticulin BBA889900
089 Tubulin-1α chain P28752
093 RuBisCO LSU P12089
095 RuBisCO LSU P12089
096 Unknown
108 Unknown
129 RuBisCO activase P93431
162 RuBisCO activase P93431
212 Hypothetical protein P31545
226 Unknown
239 Tetraphosphate phosphorylase II P49348
278 Ascorbate peroxidase BAB17666
309 GSH-dependent dehydroascorbate BAA90672
313 Histone H1 S59589

RuBisCO activase, a key enzyme in carbon assimilation during photosymthesis, was identified here as a GA3-up-regulated protein. RuBisCO activase has been shown to function as GA-binding protein in rice (38), inducing two independent cytosolic Ca2+-dependent protein kinase signaling components downstream to the RuBisCO activase, suggesting their roles in the GA signaling (39).

Tubulin-1α chain was also identified as GA3-up-regulated protein. Therefore, We have found that some isotypes of both β-tubulin and α-tubulin are up-regulated by GA3 using microarray as well as proteomic approaches, suggesting that tubulins play important roles in GA-regulated growth processes in rice. Microtubules are involved in many cellular processes, such as cell division and cell elongation in plants. Tubulins are the major protein in the microtubules, which are composed of repeating heterodimers of β-tubulin and α-tubulin that exist in many isotypic forms encoded by different genes. In Arabidopsis, during seed germination, β-2,4-tubulin was found to be increased by GA (40). We first selected β-tubulins as our target for detailed characterization. Homology search within the rice ESTs and genome sequence database identified at least eight β-tubulin isotypes and were designed OsTUB1-8, including three novel genes. Northern analysis using specific probes to 3’-UTR of β-tubulin isotypes showed differential and tissue-specific expression. Seven out of eight OsTUB genes were dominantly expressed in leaf sheath, while OsTUB8 was preferentially expressed in anther, including mature pollens. The existence of anther-specific β-tubulin suggests its unique role in the formation of microtubules during the anther and pollen development or pollen tube growth. Furthermore, transcripts of OsTUB5, OsTUB6 and OsTUB7 genes were significantly enhanced by GA3 but all eight OsTUB genes were repressed by abscisic acid. Our results imply that OsTUB genes are differentially regulated by developmental and hormonal signals and different OsTUB isotypes might play special role in the growth and development of specific organ in rice (41).

Conclusion

We have identified some BR- and GA-regulated genes and proteins by using cDNA microarray and proteomic approaches in rice. While some of them are previously reported BR- and GA-regulated genes or proteins, most identified genes/proteins, including some functionally unknown genes, are found to be regulated by BR and GA for the first time. Therefore, we believe our findings have important implications for understanding the mechanism by which BR and GA regulate the growth and development of rice, and the information obtained will be helpful in assigning functions to some unknown genes.

One problem we encountered is that we did not find any gene/protein overlapped in our cDNA microarray and proteomic analyses. There are many reasons that lead to this consequence. First, the number of genes in our array and tissues analyzed are limited; changed protein identified by proteomic approach may not be included in our array. Second, transcript products of some genes are too low in quantities to be detected by 2D-PAGE, therefore gene expression changed at mRNA level could not be reflected at protein levels. In order to comprehensively analyze BR- and GA-regulated genes in rice, using microarray of more genes contained in the whole genome of rice is necessary. Besides, detailed analyses are required, such as using BR and GA deficient and insensitive mutants, specific tissues, and timing of expression analysis. Furthermore, detailed analysis of the functions of newly identified genes should provide insight into the actions of BR and GA and facilitate our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of their actions. But information on post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, glycosylation and other modifications that affect gene product activity or destiny can only be obtained by proteomic approach. Therefore, to study the mechanism of BR and GA actions, both microarray and proteomics, and all means of other functional genomic methodologies are important. Such studies will provide us with increasing knowledge about the regulation of agronomically important traits and accelerate breeding crops with high productivity, good quality and broad stress resistance.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from Rice Genome Project, MAFF, and Program for Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences, Japan.

References

  • 1.Somerville C., Somerville S. Plant functional genomics. Science. 1999;285:380–383. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5426.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yu J. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica) Science. 2002;296:79–92. doi: 10.1126/science.1068037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goff S.A. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica) Science. 2002;296:92–100. doi: 10.1126/science.1068275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Feng Q. Sequenc and analysis of rice chromosome 4. Nature. 2002;420:316–320. doi: 10.1038/nature01183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sasaki T. The gemone sequence and structutre of rice chromosome 1. Nature. 2002;420:312–316. doi: 10.1038/nature01184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Holtorf H. Plant functional genomics. Naturwissenschaften. 2002;89:235–249. doi: 10.1007/s00114-002-0321-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rensink W.A., Buell C.R. Arabidopsis to rice. Applying knowledge from a weed to enhance our understanding of a crop species. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:622–629. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.040170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schoof H., Karlowski W.M. Comparison of rice and Arabidopsis annotation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003;6:106–112. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kikuchi S. Collection, mapping, and annotation of over 28,000 cDNA clones from japonica rice. Science. 2003;301:376–379. doi: 10.1126/science.1081288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dievart A., Clark S. Using mutant alleles to determine the structure and function of leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinases. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003;6:507–516. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00089-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhu T. Transcriptional control of nutrient partitionting during rice grain filling. Plant Biothechnol. J. 2003;1:59–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-7652.2003.00006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lan L. Monitoring of gene expression profiles and isolation of candidate genes involved in pollination and fertilization in rice (Oryza sativa L.) with a 10 K cDNA Microarray. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004;54:471–487. doi: 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000038254.58491.c7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Akimoto-Tomiyama C. Rice gene expression in response to N-acetylchitooligosaccharide elicitor: comprehensive analysis by DNA microarray with randomly selected ESTs. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003;52:537–551. doi: 10.1023/a:1024890601888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rabbani M.A. Monitoring expression profiles of rice gene under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscissic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA gel blot analyses. Plant Physiol. 2003;133:1755–1767. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.025742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kawasaki S. Gene expression profile during the initial phase of salt stress in rice. Plant Cell. 2003;13:889–906. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.4.889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang G. Microarray analysis of brassinosteroids- and gibberellin-regulated gene expression in rice seedlings. Mol. Genet. Genomics. 2004;271:468–478. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-0998-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yazaki J. Genomics approach to abscisic acid- and gibberellin-responsive genes in rice. DNA Res. 2003;10:249–261. doi: 10.1093/dnares/10.6.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koller A. Proteomic survey of metabolic pathways in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:11969–11974. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172183199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Komatsu S. Rice proteome database based on two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: its status in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:388–392. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mandava N.B. Plant growth-promoting brassinosteroids. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1988;39:23–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Swain S.M., Olszewski N.E. Genetic analysis of Gibberellin signal transduction. Plant Physiol. 1996;112:11–17. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schumacher K., Chory J. Brassinosteroid signal transduction: still casting the actors. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2000;3:79–84. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(99)00038-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hedden P., Kamiya Y. Gibberellin biosynthesis: enzymes, genes and their regulation. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997;48:431–460. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang J., He J. Brassinosteroids signal transduction-choice of signals and receptors. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9:91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2003.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gomi K., Matsuoka M. Gibberellin signaling pathway. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003;6:489–493. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00079-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yamamuro C. Loss of function of a rice brassinosteroid insensitive1 homology prevents internode elongation and bending of the lamina joint. Plant Cell. 2000;12:1591–1606. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.9.1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hong Z. Loss-of-function of a rice brassinosteroid biosynthetic enzyme, C-6 oxidase, prevents the organized arrangement and polar elongation of cells in the leaves and stem. Plant J. 2002;32:495–508. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hong Z. A rice brassinosteroid-deficient mutant, ebisu dwarf (d2), is caused by a loss of function of a new member of cytochrome P450. Plant Cell. 2002;15:2900–2910. doi: 10.1105/tpc.014712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wada K. Brassinolide and homobrassinolide promotion of lamina inclination of rice seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981;22:323–325. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yang G., Komatsu S. Involvement of calcium-dependent protein kinase in rice lamina inclination caused by brassinolide. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000;41:1243–1250. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcd050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang G. A novel brassinolide-enhanced gene identified by cDNA microarray is involved in the growth of rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003;52:843–854. doi: 10.1023/a:1025001304994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang G., Komatsu S. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel brassinolide enhanced gene OsBLE1 in Oryza sativa seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2004;42:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Konish H., Komatsu S. A proteomic approach to investing promotive effects of brassinolide on lamina inclination and root growth in rice seedling. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2003;26:401–408. doi: 10.1248/bpb.26.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shen S.H. Characterization of proteins responsive to gibberellin in the leaf-sheath of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling using proteome analysis. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2003;26:129–136. doi: 10.1248/bpb.26.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Komatsu S. Proteome for rice functional genomics. Kagaku To Seibutsu. 2002;40:370–376. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yokoyama R. A surprising diversity and abundance of xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolases in rice. Classification and expression analysis. Plant Physiol. 2004;134:1088–1099. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.035261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jan J. Characterization of a xyloglucan endotransglucosylase gene that is up-regulated by gibberellin in rice. Plant Physiol. 2004 doi: 10.1104/pp.104.052274. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Komatsu S. Rice gibberellin-binding phosphoprotein structurally related to ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase. FEBS Lett. 1996;384:167–171. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00275-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sharma A., Komatsu S. Involvement of a Ca2+-dependent protein kinase component downstream to the gibberellin-binding phosphoprotein, RuBisCO activase, in rice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002;290:690–695. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gallardo K. Proteomics of arabidopsis seed germination. A comparative study of wild-type and gibberellin-deficient seeds. Plant Physiol. 2002;129:823–837. doi: 10.1104/pp.002816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yoshikawa M. Expression analyses of beta-tubulin isotype genes in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003;44:1202–1207. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcg150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES