Abstract
Objective
This study aims to investigate the association of neonatal indirect hyperbilirubinemia in exclusively breast-fed infants with UGT1A1 (Uridine Diphosphate-Glucuronyl transferase 1A1) polymorphism.
Methods
50 neonates were classified into 2 groups: 1) 30 full term neonates with indirect hyperbilirubinemia (gestational age (GA) 39.5 ± 1.2 weeks); 2) 20 apparently healthy full-term neonates. Group 1 was further subdivided based on percentage of body weight lost: (A) less than 10%; (B) 10% or more.
Results
There was a statistically significant decrease in weight at sample collection and significant increase in indirect bilirubin level in patients group compared to control group, there was statistically significant difference as regard to genotype frequency [G/G, G/A, A/A], and allele frequency (A,G) between patients and control group. There was statistically significant increase in indirect bilirubin level in G/A – A/A genotypes. By comparing subgroup (A) and subgroup (B), there was statistically significant increase in total bilirubin level in subgroup (B). There was statistically high significant difference regarding genotype frequency (G/G, G/A, A/A) and allele frequency (G, A) between subgroup A and B. Multiple stepwise regression analysis was done using hyperbilirubinemia as a dependent factor and body weight loss, genotype (G/A) and allele (A) as independent factors. Body weight loss, genotype (G/A) and allele (A) was found to be significant independent predictors for hyperbilirubinemia.
Conclusion
The results of the present study revealed that UGT1A1 polymorphism can be used as a novel predictor for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in breast fed full term neonates.
Keywords: UGT1A1 polymorphism, Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia
Highlights
-
•
This study aims to investigate the association of neonatal indiredt hyperbilirubinemia in breast-fed infants with UGT1A1 polymorphism.
-
•
There was a statistically high significant decrease in weight at sample collection and high significant increase in indirect bilirubin level in patients group compared to control group.
-
•
There was statistically significant difference as regard to genotype frequency [G/G, G/A, A/A], and allele frequency (A,G) between patients and control group. There was statistically significant increase in indirect bilirubin level in G/A – A/A genotypes. By comparing subgroup (A) and subgroup (B).
-
•
There was statistically significant increase in total bilirubin level in subgroup (B). There was statistically high significant difference regarding genotype frequency (G/G, G/A, A/A) and allele frequency (G, A) between subgroup A and B.
-
•
Multiple stepwise regression analysis was done using hyperbilirubinemia as a dependent factor and body weight loss, genotype (G/A) and allele (A) as independent factors. Body weight loss, genotype (G/A) and allele (A) was found to be significant independent predictors for hyperbilirubinemia.
1. Introduction
Neonatal Jaundice is one of the most common neonatal problems. Although up to 60% of term newborns have clinical jaundice in the first week of life, few have significant underlying disease. However hyperbilirubinemia in the neonatal period can be associated with severe illness such as hemolytic disease, metabolic and endocrine disorders, anatomic abnormalities in the liver, and infections [1].
As red blood cells are lysed, they release hemoglobin. Heme molecules (from hemoglobin) are converted to bilirubin. Bilirubin (unconjugated or indirect) is bound to serum albumin and transferred to the liver where it is conjugated to glucuronate by glucuronyl transferase. Conjugated (direct) bilirubin is excreted into bile. A fraction of bilirubin from the stool is reabsorbed into the blood via the portal circulation (enterohepatic circulation) [1].
Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is “the occurrence of elevated bilirubin levels in blood in neonates”. It may be physiological or pathological if the concentration of unconjugated bilirubin in the blood is too high, it reaches the blood brain barrier and encephalopathy occurs with serious consequences for the child [2]. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (a common transitional phenomenon during the first week of life), is caused by an imbalance between bilirubin production and its elimination [3].
Early neonatal jaundice (Onset less than 24 h): Haemolytic disease: eg, haemolytic disease of the newborn (rhesus), ABO incompatibility, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, spherocytosis. Infection: congenital (eg, toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex, syphilis) or postnatal infection [3].
UGT (Uridine Diphosphate-Glucuronyl transferase) is a cytosolic glycosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.17) that catalyzes the transfer of the glucuronic acid component of UDP-glucuronic acid to a small hydrophobic molecule. This is a glucuronidation reaction. UGTs are membrane-bound enzymes localized in the endoplasmic reticulum of liver and extrahepatic tissues [4]. UGTs are classified into two families based on their amino acid sequence. Expression of these enzymes occurs in a tissue-specific manner, with many of the proteins expressed in the liver.
UGT1 family consists of a number of UGTs that results from alternate splicing of multiple exon-1 with common exons 2–5, different exon-1 sequences on the locus is associated with 4 downstream common exons which are common to all UGT1A isoforms, UGT1A1 is the only isoform that contributes in a biologically relevant way to bilirubin glucuronidation [5]. Mutations in the UGT1A1 gene are responsible for severe (Crigler- Najjar syndrome) and mild (Gilbert syndrome) forms of hyperbilirubinemia [6]. The reduced glucuronidating activity of these mutated forms contributes to lower bilirubin excretion by the liver.
The TaqMan probe is a single stranded oligonucleotide containing a fluorophore (fluorescent chemical compound that can re-emit light upon light excitation.) and quencher (substance decreases the fluorescence intensity) placed10-30 bases apart. The TaqMan probe is hydrolyzed during the amplification due to the5′-3'double-strand-specific exonuclease activity of the Taq polymerase that separates the fluorophore from the quencher, resulting in fluorescence increase. Real time PCR instruments are equipped with fluorescence detectors and software capable of estimating the cycle threshold(Ct), the cycle at which fluorescence is greater than back ground fluorescence [7]. This study hypothesis that UGT1A1 polymorphism may cause neonatal indirect hyperbilirubinemia in exclusively breast-fed infants with weight loss.
2. Subjects & methods
2.1. Subjects
This case control study was conducted on 30 hyperbilirubinemic full term neonates during the period from June 2015 till February 2016. The cases were chosen from patients attending the pediatric department and outpatient clinic of Benha University Hospital. This study was approved by Ethical committee of Benha University.
This group was classified into two subgroups as following:
Group(I):This group included 30 hyperbilirubinemic full term neonates; they were sub classified into 2 subgroups:
-
•
Sub group I (A):Neonates had<10% body weight loss during the neonatal period.
-
•
Sub group I (B):Neonates had ≥10% body weight loss during the neonatal period.
2.1.1. Inclusion criteria
-
1.
All subjects exclusive breast fed neonates with gestational age (GA)39.5 ± 1.5 weeks& birth weight 3080 ± 325 g.
-
2.
The measured serum bilirubin level exceeds the following values10 mg/dl at day1; 14 mg/dl at day 2; 16 mg/dl at day 3; 17 mg/dl at day 4; 18 mg/dl at day5 and 20 mg/dl at day 6 according to bilirubin chart [8].
2.1.2. Exclusion criteria
Neonates with risk factors that affect the level of serum bilirubin were excluded, such as: Hemolytic anemia, infection, intestinal malformation, maternal diabetes, hypertension, neonatal asphyxia.
Group (II): This group included 20 apparently healthy full term neonates with matched age and sex as control group, they were subdivided according to weight into 2subgroups:
-
•
Sub group II (A):12 neonates had normal body weight
-
•
Sub group II (B): 8 neonates had ≥ 10% body weight loss during the neonatal period.
Informed consent was obtained from parents of each participant,
2.2. Methods
Individuals of the studied 2 groups were subjected to the following:
-
1
Full history taking: maternal history, mode of delivery and family history.
-
2
Thorough clinical examination: measurement, vital signs and systemic examination.
-
3
The laboratory investigations included:
2.2.1. Sampling
6 mL of venous blood were withdrawn under aseptic precautions after and distributed as follows:
-
a
Three ml of venous blood were withdrawn on EDTA, (1.2 mg/ml) for detection of hemoglobin and reticulocyte-count and the remaining stored at–20 °C for subsequent DNA extraction.
-
b
Three ml blood were withdrawn for serum separation, after clotting, the sample was centrifuged and the resultant serum was used for measurement of bilirubin level and liver function tests.
2.2.2. Laboratory investigations
-
A)Routine Laboratory Investigations:
-
ICBC was done for all samples using a fully automated cell counter, Mythic 18 (Orphee) from Switzerland.
-
IITranscutaneous bilirubin twice daily at (8 a.m. and 8 p.m.) by using MBJ20 transcutaneous jaundice detector [M & B electronic instruments jaundice dectector, version: U 3.0 China] during first week of life. And when the peak transcutaneous bilirubin exceed the level, we so serum bilirubin.
-
-serum bilirubin was measured photometrically and the analysis was done using (Photometer BioSystems BTS-310, Spain).
-
I
-
B)Specific Laboratory Investigations:
- Determination of UGT1A1 genotype:
All subjects were genotyped for UGT1A1polymorphism by real time PCR TaqMan drug metabolism assay by the following steps:
-
1
DNA was isolated by pure link genomic DNA mini kits (50 preps), (invitrogen by life technologies Cat no (K1820-01) (Lot No. 1607712). Principle:
The PureLinkR Genomic DNA Kits are based on the selective binding of DNA to silica-based membrane in the presence of chaotropic salts. The lysate is prepared from a variety of starting materials such as blood. The cells are digested with Proteinase K at 55 °C using an optimized digestion buffer formulation that aids in protein denaturation and enhances Proteinase K activity. Any residual RNA is removed by digestion with RNase A prior to binding samples to the silica membrane.
The lysate is mixed with (ethanol and PureLinkR Genomic Binding Buffer) that allows high DNA binding PureLinkR Spin Column (Mini Kit). The DNA binds to the silica-based membrane in the column and impurities are removed by thorough washing with Wash Buffers. The genomic DNA is then eluted in low salt Elution Buffer.
available at https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/purelink_genomic_man.pdf.
DNA Yield: After purification with PureLinkR Genomic DNA Purification Kit, the yield of purified DNA was estimated by UV absorbance at 260 nm.
-
2
AmplificationbyReal-Time PCR: The isolated genomic DNA was amplified using sets of primers& taqman probes designed to detect the target polymorphism. TaqMan Universal Master mixΙΙ No UNG (Applied Biosystems. AB).(Lot.No:1504030). https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/TaqMan_SNP_Genotyping_Assays_man.pdf
Each allele-specific taqMan MGB probe has:
A reporter dye at its 5'end.
-
-
VIC dye is linked to the 5'end of the allele 1 probe.
-
-
FAM dye is linked to the 5'end of the allele 2 probe.
TGACGCCTCGTTGTACATCAGAGAC (A/G) GAGCA TTTTACACCTTGAAGACGTA.
-
•
A miner groove binder (MGB), which increase the melting temperature (Tm) for a given probe length. The presence of the MGB results in greater differences in (Tm) value between matched and mismatched probes. These difference produce more allelic discrimination.
-
•
A non fluorescent quencher (NFQ) at its 3'end which allows detection of reporter dye contributions with greater sensitivity.
PCR was done in thermal cycler according to the following thermal conditions (Table 1).
-
3
The PCR amplification products were analyzed by thermo-scientific PikoReal PCR software 2 for allelic discrimination. [Cat no. N12076].
Table 1.
Thermal conditions of PCR.
| Parameter | Polymerase activation | PCR (40 cycles) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Denature | Anneal/extend | ||
| Temperature (°C) | 95 °C | 95 °C | 60 °C |
| Time (mm:ss) | 02:00 | 00:15 | 01:00 |
The system software records the results of the genotyping run on a scatter plot of Allele 1 (VIC® dye) versus Allele 2 (FAM™ dye). Each well of the reaction plate is represented as an individual point on the plot. The clusters in the plot show the three genotypes of one SNP.
2.2.3. Allelic discrimination (AD) analysis
In the allelic discrimination analysis the Cq values of AD standard groups are compared, and samples are classified as belonging to a certain group. PikoReal software groups the samples by calculating the distance between each sample and the average standard values.
3. Statistical analysis
The collected data were tabulated and analyzed using SPSS version 16 soft ware (Spss Inc, Chicago, ILL Company). Categorical data were presented as number and percentages while quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and range. Chi square test (X2), or Fisher's exact test (FET), odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% CI were calculated when applicable. Quantitative data were tested for normality using student t-test if normally distributed, or Man Whitney U test, and Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho) if not normally distributed. Binary logistic regression analysis with the adjusted Odds Ratios was used to detect the significant predictors of hyperbilirubinemia. The accepted level of significance in this work was stated at 0.05 (P < 0.05 was considered significant).
Mean: Is the sum of the values in a set of data divided by the number of the values in the set. It is denoted by the sign X (called X bar).
Standard deviation (SD): is the positive square root of the variance.
Chi square test: compares between 2 or more categorical groups (tables 2 × 2 or more).
Fisher's exact test is used when you have two nominal variables. Fisher's exact test is more accurate than the chi-squared test when the expected numbers are small.
OR (Odds Ratio) is a risk index = odds in exposed/odds in non exposed, it quantifies the risk among study group compared with the control group.95% CI of OR = is the interval within which the investigator is 95% confident that the true population OR lies.
“Z” test = is a test of significance that compares between 2 proportions.
Student “t” test compares between 2 means of 2 independent groups: t-value is the ratio of the difference between the two means/calculated SD of this difference.
rho→Spearman's correlation coefficient: evaluates the linear association between 2 quantitative variables (one is the independent var. X, and the other is the dependent var., Y).
Mann Whitney U test: non parametric test used to compare 2 non parametric quantitive variables.
4. Results
By comparison between patient and control groups, it was found that, there were no-significant difference between both groups regarding. gestational age, age, sex, mode of delivery and birth weight (P > 0.05). While, there was a statistically high significant decrease in weight at sample collection in patients group (P ≤ 0.001). (Table 2). There was a statistically high significant increase in indirect serum bilirubin level in patient group (16.7 ± 3.72 vs 5.18 ± 1.02) mg/dl.
Table 2.
Demographic characteristics of the studied groups and patients subgroups.
| Variable | Patients (N = 30) |
Controls (N = 20) |
t | P | Subgroup I A (N = 22) | Subgroup I B (N = 8) | t | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (wk) Mean ± SD |
39.1 ± 0.64 | 39.2 ± 0.82 | 0.11 | 0.91 (NS) | 39.1 ± 0.61 | 39.2 ± 0.75 | 0.41 | 0.68 (NS) | |
| Age (days) Mean ± SD |
3.1 ± 1.4 |
3.0 ± 1.5 |
0.52 |
0.60 (NS) |
3.2 ± 1.5 |
3.1 ± 1.3 |
0.05* |
0.96 (NS) |
|
| No.(%) |
No.(%) |
X2 |
P |
FET |
P |
||||
| Sex | Male | 20 (66.7%) | 11 (55.0%) | 0.69 | 0.41 (NS) | 15 (68.2%) | 5 (62.5%) | – | 1.0 (NS) |
| Female | 10 (33.3%) | 9 (45.0%) | 7 (31.8%) | 3 (37.5%) | |||||
| Mode of delivery | NVD | 16 (53.3%) | 12 (60.0%) | 0.22 | 0.64 (NS) | ||||
| C.S | 14 (46.7%) | 8 (40.0%) | |||||||
| Birth weight (gm) Mean ± SD |
3251.6 ± 184.9 | 3179.5 ± 290.5 | 1.08 | 0.28 (NS) | 3267.7 ± 202.5 | 3207.5 ± 125.2 | 0.71 | 0.48 (NS) | |
| Weight at sample collection (gm) Mean ± SD |
2971.4 ± 175.7 | 3197.5 ± 284.4 | 3.48 | 0.001 (HS) | 3021.4 ± 173.7 | 2833.7 ± 88.97 | 3.03 | 0.002 (S) | |
| Weight loss (%) | 7.46 ± 1.18 | 11.60 ± 0.81 | 4.13 | <0.001 (HS) | |||||
| T. bilirubin (mg/dl) Mean ± SD | 17.6 ± 4.33 | 21.1 ± 1.21 | MWU test = 2.18 | 0.029 (S) | |||||
| Indirect. bilirubin (mg/dl) Mean ± SD | 14.1 ± 3.98 | 17.9 ± 3.32 | 2.14 | 0.032 (S) | |||||
NVD: Normal vaginal delivery, C.S: Caserean section.
NS: Non significant, X2 = Chisquare, SD = standard deviation, t = student-t-test, P > 0.05 = non-significant, P < 0.001 = very highly significant.
Group I (A): Included 22 patients (7 females and 15 males), with maximal body weight loss less than 10%.
Group I (B): Included 8 patients (3 females and 5 males), with maximal body weight loss 10% or more.
There was non-significant difference regarding birth weight (P > 0.05).
While there was a statistically significant decrease in weight at sample collection in subgroup I(B) (P < 0.05). Also there was a statistically high significant increase in weight loss percent in subgroup I (B) (P ≤ 0.001) (Table 2). By comparing subgroup I(A) and subgroup I (B), there was a statistically significant increase in indirect serum bilirubin level in subgroup I (B) (17.9 ± 3.32 vs 14.1 ± 3.98) mg/dl (Table 2).
By comparing patient and control groups, it was found that, there was a statistically significant difference as regard to genotype frequency [G/G, G/A, A/A] (P < 0.05), and allele frequency (A,G) P = 0.011 (Table 3) and (Fig. 1).
Table 3.
Comparison of the studied groups regarding genotype& allele frequency.
| Groups |
Total | FET & P | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | Controls | |||||
| Genotype | G/G | Count | 19 | 19 | 38 | 6.65 & 0.025 (S) |
| % within groups | 63.3% | 95.0% | 76.0% | |||
| G/A | Count | 10 | 1 | 11 | ||
| % within groups | 33.3% | 5.0% | 22.0% | |||
| A/A | Count | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| % within groups | 3.3% | 0.0% | 2.0% | |||
| Allele | G | Count | 48 | 39 | 87 | OR (95% CI) 9.7 (1.21–76.9) |
| % within Groups | 80.0% | 97.5% | 87.0% | |||
| A | Count | 12 | 1 | 13 | ||
| % within Groups | 20.0% | 2.5% | 13.0% | |||
FET: fisher exact test, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.
Fig. 1.
Example of the allelic discrimination of the UGT1A1*28 variant by TaqMan PCR.
By comparing genotype groups (G/G, G/A, A/A), it was found that there was non-significant difference as regard to gestational age, age, sex, birth weight and mode of delivery (P > 0.05), there was a statistically significant increase in total bilirubin level in G/A – A/A genotypes (P < 0.05) (Table 4). There was a statistically significant decrease in weight at sample collection in G/A, A/A genotypes (P < 0.05). Also there was a statistically high significant increase in weight loss percent in G/A (P ≤ 0.001) (Table 4).
Table 4.
Comparison of the weight of the studied patients according to genotype.
| Group | n. | Mean ± SD | Range | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth weight (gm) | |||||
| G/G | 19 | 3272.1 ± 206.30 | 2980–3950 | 0.79 | 0.43 (NS) |
| G/A- A/A | 11 | 3216.3 ± 142.98 | 3050–3400 | ||
| Weight at sample collection (gm) | |||||
| G/G | 19 | 3028.0 ± 180.88 | 2730–3600 | 2.52 | 0.018 (S) |
| G/A- A/A | 11 | 2873.6 ± 118.59 | 2740–3100 | ||
| Weight loss (%) | |||||
| G/G | 19 | 7.4 ± 1.35 | 5.4–10.5 | 5.59 | <0.001 (HS) |
| G/A- A/A | 11 | 10.6 ± 1.74 | 7.7–12.6 | ||
| T. bilirubin (mg/dl) Mean ± SD Range MWU test | |||||
| G/G | 19 | 17.2 ± 4.5 | (9.1–19.8) | 2.25 | 0.03 (S) |
| G/A- A/A | 11 | 20.7 ± 1.136 | (19–22) | ||
Man Whitney U (MWU) test was used.
There was a statistically high significant difference regarding genotype frequency (G/G. G/A. A/A). (P < 0.001) and allele frequency (G, A) (P < 0.05) (Table 5). By comparing control subgroups, there was non-significant difference regarding genotype frequency (Table 6). A multiple stepwise regression analysis was done using hyperbilirubinemia as a dependent factor and body weight loss, genotype (G/A) and allele as independent factors. Body weight loss, genotype (G/A) and allele (A) was found to be a significant independent predictors for hyperbilirubinemia. (Table 7).
Table 5.
Comparison between patient subgroups regarding genotype & allele frequency.
| Subgroups |
P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | |||
| Genotype |
G/G Count (% within subgroups) |
18 (81.8%) |
1 (12.5%) |
P < 0.001 (HS) |
| G/A Count % within subgroups |
3 (13.6%) |
7 (87.5%) |
||
| A/A Count % within subgroups |
1 (4.5%) |
0 (0.0%) |
||
| Group A |
Group B |
OR |
||
| Allele | G Count % within subgroups |
39 88.6% |
9 56.2% |
6.07 (1.6–23.5) |
| A Count % within subgroups |
5 11.4% |
7 43.8% |
P = 0.01 (S) | |
Table 6.
Comparison between control subgroups regarding genotype frequency.
| Control group II |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wtloss<10% (II A) |
Wtloss>10% (II B) |
||||
| Genotype | G/G | Count | 11 | 8 | 19 |
| % within wtloss | 91.7% | 100.0% | 95.0% | ||
| G/A- A/A | Count | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| % within wtloss | 8.3% | 0.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Total | Count | 12 | 8 | 20 | |
| % within wtloss | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
P = 1.0 (NS).
Table 7.
Binary logistic regression analysis for predictors of hyperbilirubinemia.
| Variable | Β | Adjusted OR | 95%CI | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body wt loss | 2.39 | 6.31 | 2.2–19.8 | 0.001 (HS) |
| Genotype (G/A) | 2.04 | 5.82 | 1.29–23.5 | 0.02 (S) |
| Allele (A) | 3.63 | 8.3 | 2.1–20.9 | 0.001 (HS) |
5. Discussion
Due to the disparity of results among different neonates we aimed at studying such association in Egyptian neonates having indirect hyperbilirubinemia. The study was designed to clarify the association of UGT1A1 polymorphism and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in breast fed Egyptian neonates. All neonates were subjected to full history taking and clinical examination. Total & indirect serum bilirubin was assessed in all neonates, and then all samples were genotyped for the UGT1A1 polymorphism using taqMan genotyping technique.
In the present study, the groups were well matched for various demographic features. there, these results were in agreement with Hiroko et al. [9], who reported that there was no statistically significant difference between the studied groups regarding body weight and age at time of sample collection. Also these results were in accordance with a study done by Hung et al. [10].
While Hui et al. [11], reported that the age at time of sample collection and body weight at birth showed a statistically significant difference between the studied groups this could be due to difference in number of studied populations.
In the present study there were no statistically significant difference between the studied groups regarding gender (sex) and gestational age, while Hiroko et al. [9], reported that neonates with shorter gestational age were risk predictors of development of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. These results were in agreement with Hung et al. [10] and Melih et al. [12]reported that there was no significant difference between the studied groups regarding gender and gestational age.
The present study showed that maximal body weight loss was significantly higher in subgroup (B) cases especially in cases with the G/A and A/A genotype compared to those carrying the G/G genotype, so it is considered a significant risk factor and a significant independent predictor for the development of hyperbilirubinemia.
These results were in agreement with Chang et al. [13]and Hiroko et al. [9], who reported that maximal body weight loss was an independent risk factor for the development of neonatal indirect hyperbilirubinemia.
It has been suggested that body weight loss due to inadequate feeding of breast fed neonates which may increase intestinal absorption impair hepatic conjugation and/or excretion of bilirubin because of energy deficiency and causes hyperbilirubinemia.
The present study showed that neonates in group (B) had a significantly higher peak transcutaneous bilirubin levels especially those with G/A, A/A genotypes. These results were in accordance with a study done by Youyou et al. [14], who reported that there was association between 211 G/A genotype, which is a risk factor for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and higher serum indirect bilirubin level.
Also these results were in agreement with Hiroko et al. [9], who reported that peak bilirubin levels were significantly higher in cases who carrying G/A genotype compared to others carrying G/G or A/A genotype.
The present study showed that there was statistically significant differences between the studied groups regarding genotype frequency (G/G, G/A, A/A) these results were in agreement with Hiroko et al. [9] and Zibi et al. [15] who reported that there were statistically significant difference in the genotype frequencies of UGT1A1 between patient groups.
The present study showed that there was statistically significant difference between the studied groups regarding allele frequency (G/A). These were in agreement with Zibi et al. [15] who reported that there were significant differences between G allele and A allele.
The present study showed that incidence of hyperbilirubinemia was statistically significant in subgroup (B) is especially with those who carrying GA, A/A genotypes than carrying G/G genotypes these results were in agreement with Hiroko et al. [9] who reported that the incidence of hyperbilirubinemia was significantly higher in group (B) neonates with heterozygous UGT1A1-211G > A genotype, this discrepancy may be due to different technique used.
In the present study, multiple stepwise regression analysis was done by using hyperbilirubinemia as dependent factors and body weight loss, genotype (G/A) and allele (A) as independent factor and body weight loss, genotype (G/A), allele (A) was found to be significant independent predictors for hyperbilirubinemia.
These results were in agreement with Hiroko et al. [9] who reported that maximal body weight loss is the only independent risk factor for the development of hyperbilirubinemia and UGT1A1 polymorphism become risk factor in neonates showing 10% or more body weight loss during the neonatal period (only in infants with inadequate feeding).
Also these results were in accordance with Zibi et al. [15] who reported that the A allele was found to be associated with a risk of hyperbilirubinemia. Based on these results, it could be reasonable to speculate that neonates with body weight loss 10% or more, A-allele compared to neonate with body weight loss less than 10%, G. allele, may have an increased risk for developing hyperbilirubinemia.
Inadequate feeding may increase the bilirubin burden and cause apparent hyperbilirubinemia in neonates, who have a polymorphic change in the genes involved in the transport of bilirubin.
The results presented here need to be confirmed by using larger groups and other related genes, also only long follow up study would be necessary to confirm the association between this polymorphism and hyperbilirubinemia.
6. Conclusion
This study suggests that UGT 1A1 polymorphism can be used as a novel method to detect susceptibility to indirect hyperbilirubinemia in Egyptians exclusively breast fed neonates with weight loss >10% or more and can help for early manage newborns with hyperbilirubinaemia.
Conflicts of interest
No conflict of interest.
Sources of funding
No fund.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was taken by Benha university.
Author contribution
Amal E. Mohammed: study design.
Eman G. Behiry: data collections, data analysis, writing.
Akram E. El-Sadek: data collections, data analysis, writing.
Waleed E. Abdulghany: data collections, data analysis.
Dalia M. Mahmoud: data collections, data analysis.
Abdelfattah A. Elkholy: data collections.
Guarantor
Eman G. Behiry.
References
- 1.Stoll B.J., Kliegman R.M. Jaundice and hyperbilirubinemia. In: Beherman R.E., Kliegman R.M., Jason H.B., editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. seventeenth ed. Saunders; Philadelphia: 2004. pp. 592–606. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mesic I., Milas V., Medimurec M., Rimar Z. Unconjugated pathological jaundice in new borns. Coll. Antropol. 2014;38(1):173–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stevenson D.K., Vreman H.J., Wong R.J. Bilirubin production and the risk of bilirubin neurotoxicity. Semin. Perinatol. 2011;35(3):121–126. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hahn K.K.1, Wolff J.J., Kolesar J.M. Pharmacogenetics and irinotecan therapy. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2006;63(22):2211–2217. doi: 10.2146/ajhp060155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bosma P.J. Inherited disorders of bilirubin metabolism. J. Hepatol. 2003;38:107–117. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(02)00359-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kadakol A., Ghosh S.S., Sappal B.S., Sharma G., Chowdhury J.R., Chowdhury N.R. Genetic lesions of bilirubin uridine-diphosphoglucuronate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1) causing Crigler-Najjar and Gilbert syndromes: correlation of genotype to phenotype. Hum. Mutat. 2000;16:297–306. doi: 10.1002/1098-1004(200010)16:4<297::AID-HUMU2>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Prithiviraj J., Vincent H., Jothikumar N. Design of FET TagMan probes for multiplex real- time PCR using an internal positive control. BioTechniques. 2009;46:519–524. doi: 10.2144/000113127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bhutani V.K., Johnson L.A. Aproposal to prevent severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and kernicterus. J. Perinatol. 2009;29:561–567. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sato Hiroko, Uchida Toshihiko, Toyota Kentaro, Naka Mura Tomohiro, Tamiya Gen, Kanno Miyako. Association of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in breast-fed infants with UGT1A1 or SLCOs polymorphisms. J. Hum. Genet. 2015;60:35–40. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2014.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hung C.C., Mei H.C., Hwai I.Y., Yi N.S. 211 G to A Variation of UDP-Glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene and neonatal breastfeeding jaundice. Pediatr. Res. 2011;69:170–174. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31820263d2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hui Y., Qian W., Lei Z., Xiang B.Z. Clinical significance of UGT1A1 genetic analysis in Chinese neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr. Neonatol. 2015:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Melih O., Babaoglu Sule Y., Sukru A. Neonatal jaundice and bilirubin UDP- glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene polymorphism in Turkish patients. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005;98:377–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chang P.F., Lin Y.C., Liu K., Yeh S.J., Ni Y.H. Risk of Hyperbilirubinemia in breast fed infants. J. Pediatr. 2011;159:561–565. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.03.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Youyou Z., San-nan W., Hong L.I., Weifeng Z., Weifeng Zha, Xuli Wang, Yuanyuan Liu. Association of UGT1A1 variants and hyperbilirubionemia in breast- fed full- term Chinese infants. PLoS One. 2014;9:8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zibi Y., Kaichang Z., Li W., Ying L., Jianmei Sun. Association of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia with UGT1A1 genepolymorphisms: a meta- Analysis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2015;21:3104–3114. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


