Abstract
In order to evaluate the role of persisting virus replication during occult phase immunisation in the live attenuated SIV vaccine model, a novel SIVmac239Δnef variant (SIVrtTA) genetically engineered to replicate in the presence of doxycycline was evaluated for its ability to protect against wild-type SIVmac239. Indian rhesus macaques were vaccinated either with SIVrtTA or with SIVmac239Δnef. Doxycycline was withdrawn from 4 of 8 SIVrtTA vaccinates before challenge with wild-type virus. Unvaccinated challenge controls exhibited ~107 peak plasma viral RNA copies/ml persisting beyond the acute phase. Six vaccinates, four SIVmac239Δnef and two SIVrtTA vaccinates exhibited complete protection, defined by lack of wild-type viraemia post-challenge and virus-specific PCR analysis of tissues recovered post-mortem, whereas six SIVrtTA vaccinates were protected from high levels of viraemia. Critically, the complete protection in two SIVrtTA vaccinates was associated with enhanced SIVrtTA replication in the immediate post-acute vaccination period but was independent of doxycycline status at the time of challenge. Mutations were identified in the LTR promoter region and rtTA gene that do not affect doxycycline-control but were associated with enhanced post-acute phase replication in protected vaccinates. High frequencies of total circulating CD8+T effector memory cells and a higher total frequency of SIV-specific CD8+ mono and polyfunctional T cells on the day of wild-type challenge were associated with complete protection but these parameters were not predictive of outcome when assessed 130 days after challenge. Moreover, challenge virus-specific Nef CD8+ polyfunctional T cell responses and antigen were detected in tissues post mortem in completely-protected macaques indicating post-challenge control of infection. Within the parameters of the study design, on-going occult-phase replication may not be absolutely required for protective immunity.
Author Summary
Development of an HIV vaccine remains a global health priority. In non-human primates live-attenuated SIV induces a potent vaccine effect. Following disappearance of vaccine virus from the peripheral circulation replication persists in lymphoid tissue. To address whether this occult replication is critical to the generation of protective immunity we used a novel construct (SIVrtTA) based on the prototypic live attenuated SIVmac239Δnef but which requires the presence of the antibiotic doxycycline to replicate. Protection appeared independent of doxycycline status at the time of virulent virus challenge suggesting that occult replication may not be absolutely necessary for persistence of immunity; however, stronger protection was observed in monkeys vaccinated with SIVrtTA where vaccine replication persisted for longer after peak viraemia. Moreover, some evidence of very low level breakthrough of vaccine virus replication was seen and protection was weaker than that obtained with SIVmac239Δnef. Both vaccination and challenge perturbed circulating T cell populations, but only the frequency of SIV-specific CD8+ polyfunctional T cells measured on the day of challenge was associated with protection. Replication-conditional mutants such as SIVrtTA have great potential in unlocking the complex interactions between the vaccine virus and host responses in the generation of potent anti-viral protection in vivo.
Introduction
Live attenuated SIV has proven to be a highly effective vaccination strategy in non-human primate (NHP) models of HIV/AIDS [1,2], in many cases protecting macaques from detectable superinfection following re-challenge with both homologous and heterologous wild-type SIV administered systemically and mucosally [3–23]. Although safety concerns such as reversion to virulence and recombination with wild-type strains preclude direct application of this vaccine approach in humans, a clearer understanding of mechanisms of pathogenesis and protection may inform the development of more clinically acceptable HIV vaccines. Studies have been performed using vaccine viruses attenuated by genetic disruption of key regulatory genes including nef, vpx, vpr and vif; although the moderately attenuated prototypic vaccine strain SIVmac239Δnef has been used for the majority of studies.
Attempts to establish clearly defined immune correlates of protection have not been conclusive, particularly where studies have measured responses in peripheral blood. Indeed, the only robust correlate identified so far is the observation between increasing attenuation of the vaccine virus and decreasing protection [11]. Recently, a detailed comparative study of different attenuated virus strains derived from SIVmac239 concluded that protection was associated with the induction of an effector memory T cell (TEM) response and protection of the T follicular helper (TFH) cell subset in lymphoid tissue [10]. This association, however, is not definitively established as the mechanism of protection.
A crucial property of minimally-attenuated SIV vaccines, which are the most effective, is the widespread distribution of the vaccine virus in multiple lymphoid tissues [22] but the role of occult replication (i.e. replication in lymphoid tissue when virus is no longer or only intermittently detected in the peripheral circulation) in the generation of protective immunity is not fully understood. Vaccine virus persistence may result in multiple alterations in the host innate immune system that contribute to protection, in addition to the induction of adaptive immune responses [22]. In the study reported here we have sought to influence occult phase persisting turnover of live attenuated SIV using a novel approach: the conditionally live attenuated SIVmac239Δnef vaccine (SIVrtTA) that in vitro is absolutely dependent on the presence of doxycycline (dox) to replicate [24, 25]. Previously, we have shown that SIVrtTA is infectious in Indian rhesus macaques and induced reversible up-regulation of the frequency of global circulating TEM [26].
Here, we report the outcome of an intravenous challenge of two groups of SIVrtTA-vaccinated macaques with wild-type SIVmac239 in comparison with macaques vaccinated with the prototypic SIVmac239Δnef live attenuated vaccine. One group of SIVrtTA vaccinates macaques remained on daily administration of dox, whereas another group received the final dose of dox 8 weeks prior to wild-type virus challenge during the occult phase of virus replication. Protection against detectable infection with wild-type, highly virulent SIVmac239 was observed at various levels; however, the pattern of protection did not associate directly with the experimental treatment protocol, but with the kinetics of vaccine-virus replication in the acute and immediate post-acute period of vaccine viraemia and with vaccine-driven T cell immune responses.
Results
Viral vaccine kinetics
Two groups (A & B) of four Indian-derived rhesus macaques were injected intravenously with 5 x 103 TCID50 SIVrtTA vaccine (genetically engineered from the SIVmac239 backbone as indicated in Fig 1A) and treated with dox for 6 months followed by a period of 8 weeks without dox (Group A; E61, E63, E65, E66) or treated with dox for 6 months and then maintained on dox(Group B; E67, E68, E70, E71). A further 4 macaques (Group C; E73, E75, E76, E77) were vaccinated with SIVmac239Δnef for 6 months and four unvaccinated, naïve macaques (E79-E82) were included as challenge controls (Fig 1B). Total SIV gag vRNA profiles are shown for Groups A-C as a continuum of vaccination and wild-type challenge profiles (Fig 1C). As previously reported [26], the SIVrtTA vaccinates displayed a transient peak in plasma vRNA kinetics which is characteristic for attenuated SIVmac239Δnef with two exceptions: E65 (Group A) and E70 (Group B). These animals exhibited a persisting shoulder of ~ 102 vRNA copies/ml to ~100 days post-vaccination. From day 110 post-infection (p.i), prior to removal of dox, E65 plasma vRNA fell below the limit of detection. Plasma vRNA remained stably elevated in E70, which was maintained on daily dox treatment to the time of wild-type challenge. Another macaque, vaccinated with SIVmac239Δnef (E76, Group C) also failed to completely control viraemia below the limit of detection. Hence, at the time of wild-type SIVmac239 challenge detectable vRNA signals were present in the plasma of vaccinates E65, E70 (SIVrtTA) and E76 (SIVmac239Δnef) (Fig 1, S1 Fig).
Challenge outcome
Challenge outcome was initially assessed by the individual comparison of total SIV gag plasma vRNA profiles for each group (Fig 1C). As expected, all four naive, unvaccinated control macaques challenged with wild-type SIVmac239 (Group D) exhibited high plasma vRNA loads (1.86 x107 mean SIV RNA copies/ml) by day 14 p.i. which also exhibited a high vRNA steady state (106–108 wtSIVmac239 copies/ml) throughout the 20 week follow-up period. In contrast, a marked vaccine effect was observed in all animals vaccinated with either SIVrtTA or SIVmac239Δnef (Fig 1C, Groups A and B or C respectively).
Statistical analyses of suppression of vRNA levels post wild-type challenge were determined using a Kruskal-Wallis analysis with a Dunn’s post-hoc test to determine significance levels. Peak viraemia was statistically significantly suppressed when Groups A, B and C were compared individually to Group D, although the vaccination with SIVmac239Δnef resulted in the most significant outcomes. P values for Groups A-C were, p = 0.05, p = 0.05 and p = 0.001 respectively at day 14. When viraemia levels were analysed at day 84 (steady-state) significance was retained in Groups A and C (p = 0.012 and p = 0.002 respectively) although, interestingly, significance was lost at day 84 in Group B (p = 0.135). All SIVrtTA vaccinates analysed together (A and B combined) exhibited significant differences from Group D challenge controls at peak (day 14) and steady-state (day 84) time-points (p = 0.025 and 0.021 respectively).
E73, E76 and E77 (vaccinated with SIVmac239Δnef) and E65 (vaccinated with SIVrtTA) exhibited plasma vRNA levels that remained <100 SIV RNA copies/ml. Macaques E76 (vaccinated with SIVmac239Δnef) and E70 (vaccinated with SIVrtTA) exhibited plasma viral loads of the vaccine virus higher than 100 SIV RNA copies/ml prior to wild-type SIV challenge, with vRNA viral loads gradually increasing in the 20 week follow-up period. Of the remaining macaques vaccinated with SIVrtTA, with undetectable plasma vRNA on the day of challenge (E61, E63, E66, E67, E68, E71), a significant peak in plasma viremia was detected 14 days after wild-type challenge (mean 5.43 x 105 SIV RNA copies per ml), which was partially resolved, but remained between 1 x 103–1 x 106 SIV RNA copies/ml 20 weeks post-challenge.
From these initial analyses it was possible to classify macaques into two levels of protection: (1) complete-protection defined as having no secondary peak after wild-type virus challenge (E65, E70: SIVrtTA; E73, E75, E76, E77: SIVmac239Δnef). (2) partially-protected macaques that exhibited a clear secondary peak of viraemia 14 days post SIVmac239 wild-type challenge (E61, E63, E66, E67, E68, E71; SIVrtTA). When these data were re-plotted, also as a continuum, two patterns of plasma vRNA profiles were revealed immediately prior to and post wild-type SIVmac239 challenge, reflecting these two general classifications of protection as represented in Fig 2. Interestingly, in the partially protected group, the secondary spike in vRNA is immediately preceded by a virtual absence in detectable vaccine-virus replication prior to wild-type challenge. By comparison, in the completely protected group, total SIV gag vRNA signals are clearly evident in the same period (~100 days) up to challenge with little perturbations in these levels post-challenge. However, as total plasma SIV RNA levels reveal only part of the overall biomarker of infection picture, discriminatory PCR assays were required to fully evaluate the protection status of each macaque.
Differential detection of viral DNA and RNA of vaccine and wt species
To discriminate further between superinfection with wild-type virus and recrudescence/persistence of vaccine virus, discriminatory PCR assays were established that selectively detect either vaccine-derived or wild-type vRNA in plasma, total vDNA signals in tissues or cell-associated viral RNA (CA-RNA). From these combined analyses a clear picture of superinfection status emerged with the ability to detect and quantify each viral nucleic acid species in blood and/or selected lymphoid tissues (Figs 2 and 3; S2 Fig). Wild-type SIVmac239-specific vRNA determinations partitioned macaques into completely protected (E65, E70, E73, E75, E76, E77) or partially protected (E61, E63, E66, E67, E68, E71) as indicated in Fig 3A. There was a highly statistically significant difference between completely protected macaques and naïve challenge controls (p<0.001 at days 14 and 84 post SIVmac239 wild-type challenge) using a Kruskal-Wallis analysis with a Dunn’s post-hoc test. Partially-protected macaques all demonstrated a spike in plasma vRNA that was unambiguously attributed to establishment of wild-type virus infection which at days 14 and 84 were non-significant (p = 0.095) compared to challenge controls, applying the same statistical test as for the completely protected group. Additionally, a broad range of lymphoid tissues was assessed for wild type SIV DNA (S2 Fig). High levels were detected in all tissues in naïve challenge controls, with lower but detectable levels in most tissues in E61, E63, E66, E67, E68 and E71, reflecting profiles of plasma viral RNA. No wild type SIV DNA was detected in any tissue from the completely-protected animal vaccinated with SIVrtTA (E65) and a single signal of wild-type SIVmac239 DNA detected in the spleen of E70. No wtSIVmac239-specific DNA was detected in animals of Group C vaccinated with SIVmac239Δnef.
Additional information relating to the ability to detect apparently replication-competent virus, rather than proviral signals, was gained for a number of tissues by measuring CA-RNA concentrations for vaccine and wild-type viruses 20 weeks after SIVmac239 challenge (Fig 3B). Wild-type SIV was never detected by any molecular biomarker of infection in those macaques vaccinated with SIVmac239Δnef (E73, E75, E76, E77), further confirming the complete protection status of this group. No wtSIVmac239 CA-RNA was detected in macaques E65 and E70 vaccinated with SIVrtTA, compared with high levels of wtSIVmac239 detected in all naïve challenge controls, particularly in the spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN). Lower levels of wtSIVmac239 CA-RNA were detected in spleen samples from E61, E63, E66, E67, E68 and E71 and more sporadically from MLN and peripheral lymph node (PLN) samples (Fig 3B). Hence, with information gained from virus-specific differential PCR techniques, taking only wild-type SIVmac239 levels as measures of outcome, there was a statistically significant difference in outcome between completely protected macaques and wild-type challenge controls and partially protected and wild-type challenge controls.
Evidence for SIVrtTA replication in protected vaccinates
Although E65 and E70 displayed undetectable signals for wild-type specific plasma and CA-RNA, both vaccinates signalled positive by SIVrtTA-specific RT-PCR, particularly E70 in the plasma, spleen and PLN (Fig 3B and 3C). These data reflect the plasma vRNA signal in E70 post-wtSIV239 challenge which was unambiguously attributable to continuous SIVrtTA replication in the continued presence of dox. Remarkably, SIVrtTA replication did not fluctuate over time in this macaque, nor was it perturbed by administration of the wild-type challenge virus (Figs 1C, 2 and 3). In this respect, E70 was comparable to macaque E76 (Group C; SIVmac239Δnef) that displayed similar continuous viral kinetics post SIVmac239 challenge despite resistance to wild-type superinfection as confirmed by lack of wild-type SIVmac239 RNA signals in either plasma or tissues.
Perhaps the most interesting vaccinate of all groups was SIVrtTA-vaccinated macaque E65, which resisted wtSIVmac239 but displayed highly controlled vRNA kinetics in the later post-acute phase. However, in the absence of dox, four blips of plasma vRNA were noted as determined by total SIV-gag qPCR (Figs 1C and 2), two prior to wild-type challenge but after dox removal and two blips after wild-type challenge. Analysis of tissues for CA-RNA indicated low, but clearly detectable SIVrtTA in the PLN at termination. Taken together, these data suggest evidence of very low, but persistent replication of SIVrtTA in E65 when there was no, or little, dox present. Moreover, both SIVrtTA vaccinates E65 and E70 had detectable levels of SIVrtTA-specific CA-RNA at termination, many weeks after initial vaccine administration. Extending these observations to Group C vaccinates (SIVmac239Δnef) all had some level of residual detectable vaccine virus replication at termination (Fig 3). Indeed, all 6 completely protected vaccinates signalled positive for the vaccine virus post-mortem in PLN suggesting this to be an important site for virus sequestration, which as well as the spleen represents an important reservoir for the vaccine virus.
Protected vaccinates did not boost anti-p27 responses
All vaccinates seroconverted to SIV Gag p27 prior to challenge with wild-type SIV (S3 Fig). Anti-p27 responses were broadly similar amongst all macaques vaccinated with SIVrtTA regardless of dox withdrawal and anti-p27 titres were lower than those in SIVmac239Δnef vaccinates. All fully protected animals, E65 and E70 vaccinated with SIVrtTA and E73, E75, E76 and E77 vaccinated with SIVmac239Δnef, showed only minor perturbations in anti-p27 titre after challenge with wild-type SIVmac239, whereas a marked increase in anti-p27 titres was detected in all other macaques (S3 Fig).
Sequence analysis of SIVrtTA upon in vivo replication
In order to address the possibility that mutations arising in SIVrtTA as a result of selection in vivo may have occurred, SIVrtTA RNA recovered from vaccinates was sequenced. For this, plasma vRNA was isolated at several times during the immediate post-acute phase period, when qRT-PCR revealed a vRNA load of >102 SIV RNA copies/ml including where there was the persisting shoulder of prolonged SIVrtTA replication in E65 and E70 SIVrtTA vaccinates.
In SIVrtTA, the Tat-TAR transcription activation mechanism has been functionally replaced by the dox-inducible Tet-On gene expression system [24, 25, 27]. To achieve this (1) TAR was inactivated through mutations in the binding sites for Tat and pTEFb, (2) the gene encoding the dox-inducible rtTA transcriptional activator was inserted at the site of the accessory nef gene and (3) tet operator (tetO) elements to which the dox-rtTA complex can bind were inserted between the NFκB and Sp1 binding sites in the U3 domain of the LTR promoter (Fig 1A). Sequencing of the LTR and leader RNA region of different SIVrtTA RNA samples demonstrated the stable presence of the TAR-inactivating mutations and no additional changes were observed in TAR. The virus also stably maintained the tetO elements but whereas the vaccine strain contained a triplicated NFκB-tetO repeat (resulting from in vitro evolution; [28]), deletion of one of these repeats was frequently observed (S1 Table; S4 Fig). Previous experiments demonstrated that such a deletion slightly reduces the transcriptional activity of the LTR promoter, but does not affect dox-control. In all macaques, a point mutation was observed in the primer binding site (PBS) sequence (T731C). This mutation was due to the fact that the SIVrtTA vaccine construct contained a PBS complementary to the infrequently used tRNAlys5 primer for reverse transcription [29, 30]. As expected, the in vivo replicating virus demonstrated a PBS sequence corresponding to the more frequently used tRNAlys3 primer. Sequencing of the tat gene did not reveal any sequence changes.
However, sequence analysis of the rtTA gene identified two non-silent codon changes (R80W and E191K) in the E65 samples isolated at 6 weeks after vaccination and later (S1 Table). The E70 sample isolated at 6 weeks after vaccination demonstrated an R80Q change, whereas later E70 samples (from 14 weeks) also demonstrated the R80W substitution. We did not identify such rtTA mutations in the other macaques vaccinated with SIVrtTA. The identified amino acid changes had never been observed previously in multiple long-term in vitro evolution experiments with SIVrtTA or with a similar dox-controlled HIVrtTA variant and hence represents a novel finding.
Testing the transcriptional activity of the new R80W and E191K rtTA variants demonstrated that the mutations did not increase the background activity in the absence of dox (no loss of dox control) nor significantly alter the dox-induced activity (S5 Fig). As both E65 and E70 showed prolonged SIVrtTA replication, the mutations may improve in vivo replication of the virus. Importantly, these results demonstrate that the in vivo replicating virus stably maintains the integrated dox-control mechanism and did not restore the Tat-TAR axis of transcription control.
No association between outcome and TRIM5 status
Since TRIM5α status and MHC type may influence vaccine challenge outcome [31, 32], the TRIM5α/TRIMcyp status and MHC type of all study macaques was determined (S2 Table). While no direct associations were identified between either MHC or TRIM5/cyp status and outcome it is interesting to note that the two macaques which failed to control the vaccine virus (E70: SIVrtTA; E76: SIVmac239Δnef) and were protected from wild-type SIVmac239 did not express any of the major mamu A alleles analysed (S1 Fig). In this study, we could not identify any confounding factors associated with TRIM5α or TRIMcyp genotype.
High frequency of total circulating CD8+ TEM on day of wt challenge was associated with, but alone not predictive of, complete protection
We have previously reported that under replication permissive conditions, during the period when live attenuated virus RNA was essentially below the limit of detection in plasma, the global circulating T effector memory (TEM) cell frequency was upregulated [26]. Hence, we were interested to determine if this effect was associated with the degree of protection from superinfection. Comparison of partially and completely protected macaques on the day of challenge revealed that for both CD4+ and CD8+ CD95+ T cells, completely protected macaques had a lower median frequency of TCM and reciprocally a higher median frequency of CD28- CCR7- TEM than partially protected macaques; however, the difference in TEM frequencies between these groups only reached significance in CD8+ T cells (ρ = 0.026; Mann-Whitney rank sum test) (Fig 4). Comparison with results from naïve macaques showed that median frequencies of both CD4+ and CD8+ TCM were significantly reduced in completely protected macaques (ρ = 0.003 and ρ = 0.008 respectively; Mann-Whitney rank sum test). Conversely, the frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ TEM (CD28- CCR7-) were significantly elevated in completely protected macaques compared with naïve macaques (ρ = 0.002 and ρ = 0.007; Mann-Whitney rank sum test). Despite these differences at the population level exceptions were seen: T cell frequencies for macaque E65, challenged under conditions of dox withdrawal were similar to those for naïve or partially protected macaques. Conversely, partially protected macaque E67 challenged under dox maintenance had a high frequency of CD28- CCR7- CD8+ TEM and partially protected macaque E71 also challenged under replication permissive conditions had relatively high frequencies of both CD28- and CD28+, CCR7- CD95+ CD8+ T cells. So, although there was an association between a high frequency of global CD8+ TEM in the circulation on the day of challenge and complete protection, a high TEM frequency alone was not predictive of complete protection status.
Perturbation of circulating global memory T cell populations following challenge regardless of protection status
The phenotype of circulating T cells was examined again at day 130 following superinfection challenge. At this time-point no significant differences were found between partially and completely protected macaques; moreover, global circulating CD4+ memory T cell populations were significantly perturbed (Fig 4). CD4+ TCM were significantly elevated in superinfection-challenged animals, regardless of protection status compared with frequencies in naïve macaques (ρ = <0.001; Mann-Whitney rank sum test). Likewise, comparison of TCM frequencies on the day of challenge with day 130 post-challenge showed significantly elevated frequencies regardless of protection status (ρ = <0.031; Wilcoxon signed rank test). The median frequencies of CD4+ CD28+CCR7- (intermediate) T cells remained elevated post challenge compared with naïve animals (ρ = 0.003 and ρ = <0.001 for partially and completely protected groups respectively; Mann-Whitney rank sum test) and showed no statistical difference between day of challenge and day 130 post challenge for either group. In contrast, the median frequencies of TEM were significantly reduced 130 days after challenge compared with those in naïve animals; although this was most marked in completely protected animals (ρ = 0.049 and ρ = 0.006, partially and complete protection groups respectively; Mann-Whitney rank sum test). Similarly, pairwise comparison of completely protected animals revealed a significant reduction in TEM cell proportions between the day of challenge and 130 days post challenge (ρ = 0.031; Wilcoxon signed rank test). Five of 6 partially protected macaques also had lower frequencies at day 130 post challenge (ρ = 0.063; Wilcoxon signed rank test).
A somewhat different pattern of perturbation in circulating CD8+ T memory cell populations was seen following superinfection challenge (Fig 4). These changes were again, as for CD4+ T cells, independent of superinfection status. Frequencies of TCM and TEM (CD28-CCR7-) were not significantly different from frequencies in naïve animals; whereas CD28+CCR7- cell frequencies were significantly elevated compared with naïve macaques for both partially and completely protected macaques (ρ = 0.014 and ρ = 0.007 respectively; Mann-Whitney rank sum test) and were not significantly different from day of challenge frequencies. Five of 6 completely protected macaques, the exception being macaque E65, had elevated TCM and reduced TEM (CD28-CCR7-) at day 130 post-challenge compared with day of challenge but failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.063 Wilcoxon signed rank sum test). Pairwise comparison of TCM and TEM frequencies at day 130 post-challenge and day of challenge in partially protected macaques showed no significant changes. Thus, the polarisation of circulating CD8+ T memory populations observed in completely protected macaques on the day of challenge was not evident 130 days after superinfection challenge.
Completely protected macaques had a higher total frequency of circulating SIV-specific CD8+ mono and polyfunctional T cells on the day of challenge compared with partially protected macaques
In order to evaluate the possible influence of SIV-specific T cell quantity and quality on protection status, PBMC were stimulated in vitro with peptide pools from SIV Gag, Rev and Tat and intracellular cytokine staining for IL-2, IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-17 was analysed by flow cytometry for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The total frequency (ie mono + bi + tri + quadruple) of SIV-specific CD8+ T cells was found to be significantly higher in completely protected compared with partially protected macaques on the day of challenge (ρ = 0.041; Mann-Whitney rank sum test); whereas no difference was seen with CD4+ cells (Fig 5). A similar analysis at day 130 after challenge failed to show a difference between groups for either CD8+ or CD4+ T cells (S6 Fig). It was noted, however, that the frequency of CD4+ T cells was markedly elevated in both groups regardless of protection status when compared with day of challenge and was statistically significantly different for completely protected animals (p = 0.063 for partially protected and p = 0.031 for fully protected animals; Wilcoxon signed rank test). In only one animal, E61, were frequencies similar on the two occasions tested (3.57% and 3.51%, day of challenge and day 130 post challenge respectively) and were largely confined to mono-functionality (see below). Although total frequencies of SIV-specific CD8+ T cells also showed an upwards trend at day 130 after challenge the differences were not statistically significant.
Quadruple cytokine positivity and IFN-γ + TNF-α dual positivity in circulating SIV-specific CD8+ T cells were associated with complete protection
Deconvolution of cytokine combinations showed that on the day of superinfection challenge 6/6 completely protected animals had circulating SIV-specific quadruple cytokine expressing CD8+ cells at a frequency of >0.02% compared to only 1/6 partially protected macaques (ρ = 0.015; Fisher’s exact test). Differences in median frequencies of maximally polyfunctional CD8+ T cells between the groups did not reach statistical significance (ρ = 0.065; Mann-Whitney rank sum test) due to the outlier E71 (Fig 6). Similarly, IFN-γ + TNF-α dual positive CD8+ T cells were absent or below 0.02% in partially protected animals whereas in the completely protected group 5/6 macaques had frequencies markedly above 0.02% (ρ = 0.015; Fisher’s exact test) with a significantly elevated median frequency (ρ = 0.026; Mann-Whitney rank sum test). Significant differences were not seen for any cytokine combination 130 days after challenge (Fig 7). No significant differences were seen between partially and completely protected groups in the frequencies of circulating SIV-specific CD4+ T cells expressing individual cytokine combinations at either the day of superinfection challenge (S7 Fig) or 130 days after challenge (S8 Fig).
Nef-specific polyfunctional CD8+ T cells were detected in mesenteric lymph nodes regardless of protection status
Although it was not possible to discern protection status-specific differences in circulating CD8+ T cell responses 130 days after wt-challenge, responses in lymphoid tissue may be more informative. Mononuclear cells extracted from mesenteric lymph nodes at necropsy were stimulated in vitro with a pool of Nef unique region-specific peptides. SIVrtTA and SIVmac239Δnef vaccine strains do not produce Nef protein, whereas the SIVmac239 challenge virus expresses full-length Nef. Surprisingly, poly and mono-functional CD8+ T cells were detected regardless of protection status (Fig 8). Although statistically different frequencies of functional cells were not detected between the groups, there was a trend towards higher reactivity in completely protected animals.
Nef antigen was detected in spleen from all SIVrtTA vaccinates but not from macaques vaccinated with SIVmac239Δnef
Sections of spleen from vaccinates, naïve challenge controls and unchallenged macaques were stained with KK77 monoclonal antibody specific for Nef (Fig 9). Positive cells were detected in partially-protected SIVrtTA vaccinates as well as fully-protected macaques E65 and E70. In contrast, macaques of Group C vaccinated with SIVmac239Δnef were indistinguishable from negative controls. Although clearly detectable staining for Nef was present in E65, the staining pattern was more diffuse with occasionally identifiable foci of positive cells, as distinguished from productively infected macaques which were partitioned into the partially protected group.
Discussion
The reported breadth and duration of protection conferred in macaques following vaccination with live attenuated SIV has many of the features required of an effective vaccine against HIV/AIDS. Understanding the mechanisms of protection may allow the informed design of intrinsically safe vaccines. Earlier attempts to improve the safety profile of live attenuated SIV by introducing multiple attenuating mutations revealed that the degree of protection was inversely proportional to the degree of attenuation [11]. Hence, it was perhaps not unexpected that SIV clones molecularly engineered to be limited to a single round of replication conferred only limited protection compared with more vigorously replicating attenuated vaccine strains [23, 33]. The development of SIVrtTA with potential to be temporally modulated for replication in vivo provides a novel tool to further dissect the processes of protection elicited by live attenuated SIV. Previously, we reported this novel virus to replicate in vivo and being fully infectious in rhesus macaques, with the ability to disseminate to lymphoid tissues and elicit a range of immunological responses including reversible changes in the frequency of memory T cell subsets dependent upon the withdrawal of dox [26].
Here, we report that vaccination with SIVrtTA confers protection against homologous wild-type challenge, in some cases similar to the ‘gold-standard’ SIVmac239Δnef vaccine. However, levels of protection were variable. Full or complete protection (based on absence of a wild-type post-challenge viraemia) was associated with a prolonged shoulder of persisting SIVrtTA vRNA signal in plasma during the dox-on period rather than the later modulation of replication in lymphoid tissues (occult replication) mediated by the administration of dox. This aberrant viraemic profile may be dependent upon intrinsic host factors, for example the availability of alternative secondary receptors, or mutational events in the vaccine virus. Notably, mutations in rtTA which do not affect dox-dependence were detected only in the fully protected macaques and may have contributed to the fitness of SIVrtTA in vivo. Interestingly, a similar virological profile was seen also in one animal vaccinated with SIVmac239Δnef. Despite the replicative fitness cost introduced by the dox-dependent regulatory elements, the remaining animals vaccinated with SIVrtTA demonstrated significant protection from wild-type SIVmac239 challenge, as breakthrough of challenge virus was at lower levels than naive challenge controls with reduced lymphoid virus sequestration. These results support the observation that in the SIV/macaque model, and in common with other live attenuated vaccines, a defining feature of efficacy is related to the ability of the vaccine virus to replicate in the early phases of vaccination and in addition, suggest that limited acute phase replication may be compensated by subsequent persistence.
SIVrtTA shows absolute dependency upon dox for its replication in vitro [24, 25] and as we have shown previously, dox status influences the TEM circulating pool [26]. Nevertheless, we have not formally directly demonstrated that dox status completely controls replication in vivo in all anatomical compartments. Whilst we consider that loss of dox-dependency is unlikely, given the lack of mutations in the known critical sites, future experiments could include challenge of naïve macaques in the absence of administration of doxycycline.
Application of discriminatory PCR assays able to unravel the relative contributions of each virus to detectable PCR signals was a critical component of this study. These assays unequivocally established that plasma RNA following challenge of Group C animals, and of fully protected SIVrtTA vaccinates E70 and E65 was vaccine-virus specific. Moreover, this was corroborated by analysis of CA-RNA in lymphoid tissues at the termination of the study. A hallmark of complete vaccine protection appeared to be the persistent replication of vaccine virus in lymphoid tissue. Surprisingly however, only a very low level of vaccine CA-RNA was detected in a single tissue of macaque E75 suggesting there may have been persistence elsewhere such as the gut and/or vaccine generated immunity had cleared infection to limits below detection at least in the tissues examined. The mechanism for the persistent low-level replication of SIVrtTA in the absence of dox in macaque E65 is unknown. As we have reported previously, low levels of vRNA have been detected by in situ hybridisation in small intestine from SIVrtTA-infected rhesus macaques following dox withdrawal [26]. Therefore, we are unable to formally exclude the possibility that dox-dependency in vivo is conditional.
It was notable that where breakthrough virus was detected in lymphoid tissues of Group B animals, maintained on dox throughout the experiment, there was no evidence of residual vaccine virus. We reported previously that proviral DNA was detected pre-challenge in the spleen, PLN and MLN of animals maintained on dox although concentrations were lower than in macaques vaccinated with SIVmac239Δnef [26]. Presumably, given the fitness disadvantage, any extant replicating SIVrtTA was displaced by the challenge wild-type virus.
Although in this study we were unable to definitively address whether persisting vaccine virus replication in lymphoid tissue is an absolute requirement for complete protection because of the reduced replication of SIVrtTA, the opportunity was available nonetheless to compare T memory cell frequencies and cellular immune responses in partially and completely protected groups. The T memory cell results showed a strong association with protection status, which in most analyses reached statistical significance. The complete loss of these associations when analysis was done 130 days after challenge is striking, particularly in (1) the polarisation of CD4+ memory T cells toward the TCM phenotype regardless of protection status and (2) the changes in proportions of CD8+ memory T cells in completely protected animals. Although not reaching statistical significance due to outliers there was a clear trend for reduction in the number of CD8+ TEM with a concomitant increase in TCM. This latter effect probably reflects a reduction in on-going antigen re-stimulation in vivo at this time and/or a redistribution of TEM to tissue compartments. We did attempt analysis in gut tissues taken post mortem; however, cell recovery was poor making interpretation of flow cytometric data unreliable.
Despite the reported lack of association between responses detected in the blood and subsequent protection [10, 12, 6], we identified a statistically significant association between high frequencies of global TEM in peripheral blood at the time of challenge and outcome. Moreover, total frequencies of SIV-specific polyfunctional CD8+ T cells were significantly higher in macaques exhibiting complete protection, compared with partially protected macaques, on the day of challenge. Interestingly however, macaque E65, which demonstrated continuous very low-level replication of SIVrtTA in the absence of dox, failed to show this association, perhaps suggesting that other factors may be associated with complete protection in this animal. Further analysis of cytokine combinations revealed that CD8+ memory T cells with quadruple cytokine staining and cells staining for IFN-γ and TNF-α were present at higher frequency in complete protection compared with the frequencies in partially protected animals. Interestingly, the one macaque that did not have detectable dual-stained CD8+ T cells, E70, had an exceptionally high frequency of quadruple staining cells. Clearly, this analysis represents only a fraction of the total picture, since proteome-wide expansion of T cells was not performed and only 4 cytokines were analysed.
ICS staining for IL-17 was included in the present study since perturbations in CD4+ and CD8+ IL-17-staining cells in both the periphery and mucosal compartments reportedly reflect SIV-induced changes in disease status [34–36] and therefore could be a useful marker particularly in animals that may become dually-infected after challenge with virulent virus (i.e. may indicate sparing from disease progression). Several animals displayed unexpectedly high IL-17 positivity either before or following superinfection challenge. The reasons for this are not known; however, it is worth pointing out that these results were obtained in the context of infection with a novel SIV construct and it is possible that in certain genetic backgrounds this virus stimulates a strongly regulatory T cell phenotype.
Analysis of SIV-specific CD8+ T cell frequencies in mesenteric lymph nodes did not reveal a difference between completely and partially protected animals; however, it did reveal evidence of a challenge virus footprint. The Nef-specific T cell responses seen could only be stimulated by wild-type virus challenge. As Nef is not a structural component of the virus, this would require de novo synthesis of Nef in infected cells. The absence of Nef-staining in the spleen of SIVmac239Δnef vaccinated animals is consistent with the notion that the mechanism of complete protection from wild-type virus challenge operates through early clearance of challenge virus; whereas in partially-protected animals T cells may suppress wild-type virus replication rates relative to those in vaccine naïve animals. It was however surprising that a low level of Nef staining was detected in the apparently completely-protected SIVrtTA vaccinated animals. Thus, although by the criteria of RNA detection and Gag-specific antibody responses post-challenge these animals appeared to be completely protected, they should perhaps be considered falling into an intermediate category between completely and partially protected. Clearly, however, these macaques were protected from overt, productive superinfection.
In this regard the timing between exposure to wild-type virus and recovery of tissues at autopsy for analysis may be critical. In this study a relatively long period (20 weeks) was allowed to elapse from time of wild-type challenge to autopsy, which is likely to have allowed sufficient time for a response to wild-type virus to be generated but where the virus was no longer detected at termination. In such a scenario, the challenge virus is likely to have been present at some level but which had been subsequently cleared by host T cell responses to wild-type virus infection reflecting previous reports in the literature where much earlier sampling for virus post-challenge (eg 14 days after wt challenge) resulted in detection of virus in tissues at necropsy but the overall virological phenotype was that of protection [37]. The likely role of T cells in this protection has been further demonstrated by CD8 T cell depletion experiments where control of the replication of both the challenge and vaccine viruses have been linked to a CD8 T cell response [38, 39].
Recently reported detailed analysis of immune responses and deep sequence characterisation of SIVmac239Δnef post-vaccination indicated that there is a shift following early, rapid virus escape due to immune pressure to variable regions targeted during the acute phase to a re-focussed immunological response to more conserved epitopes [40]. However, the level of sub-clinical antigenic drive required to deliver such an anentropic state requires clarification, perhaps also in the face of host responses to the vaccine virus, since it was also noted that macaques with undetectable plasma viraemia experienced ongoing sequence evolution of the vaccine virus. It is perhaps noteworthy that in our study we observed distinct sequence changes in the rtTA gene rescued from viral RNA in plasma, taken as a measure of recently replicating virus, in the two SIVrtTA protected macaques (E65, E70) during the early, post-acute phase of virus replication which further marked these macaques out as being virologically distinct from the other SIVrtTA vaccinates. Hence, viral evolution as a driver for improved virological fitness in vivo during the post-acute phase appears to have had a marked effect in terms of the overall protection status conferred on these two macaques. SIVrtTA replication in macaques will also probably induce immune responses not only against viral proteins but also against rtTA itself [41]. Therefore, it is plausible that the observed amino acid changes mediate a mechanism of immune-escape of the rtTA protein, which would likely improve persistent virus replication, but this was not formally investigated.
Hence, SIVrtTA vaccination of Indian rhesus macaques appears on the cusp of delivering potent vaccine protection. If SIVmac239Δnef-induced protection correlates with an expanded T cell anentropy to highly conserved epitopes with an associated increased depth of response generated over time, this likely explains the relatively poor ability of a ‘one-hit’ vaccine response, such as single cycle SIV to ensure long-lived vaccine protection. Compensations in vaccine replication appear important in conferring protection mediated by SIVrtTA, although whether these are sufficient to explain features of early protection from heterologous challenge, for example, remains unclear. Highly attenuated viral vaccines such as SIVmacΔ4 [11] which have a reduced replication potential in vivo, but which fail to persist, exhibit an intermediate protection profile. Hence the ability of SIVrtTA to exhibit low, continuous replication provides a clear advantage compared to these approaches. Lack of an increased magnitude of SIV-specific CD8 T cell responses in lymph nodes correlating with proposed mechanisms of protection for cellular responses at key sites of virus replication in the body [40], suggest that the role of CD8 T cells in this mode of vaccine protection is far from resolved, whereby a higher viral replication in turn leads to higher CD8 T cells responses in lymphatic tissue [10].
On the face of it our data appears to strongly support the view that CD8+ polyfunctional TEM are critical in protective immunity induced by live attenuated SIV as suggested by Fukazawa et al [10] for lymph node responses. However, technical limitations precluded the ability to assign ICS responsiveness specifically to memory phenotype in our study, and as in other studies, our observations remain correlative. Indeed, antibody responses to Gag p27 before and after vaccine challenge are also predictive of outcome but are unlikely of mechanistic significance. If the current paradigm of live attenuated vaccine protection is correct, it must also explain why superior responses in the host that prevent viral infection are established in the same host where host control of the vaccine is poorest. This counterintuitive observation requires a cogent answer irrespective of localisation of the vaccine virus e.g. in T-follicular helper cells which may be subject to immune privilege, or magnitude and breadth of measurable immune responses such as CD8 T cell responses which are potentially capable of targeting and controlling both vaccine and challenge viruses, yet the vaccine virus is able to persist at these key sites.
Taken together, our data provide further insight into the highly dynamic process of live attenuated SIV vaccine outcomes where the replicative properties and persisting nature of the vaccine virus appear crucial to vaccine efficacy. SIVrtTA provides a novel tool in our armoury to understand more fully processes of occult and patent virus replication at niche anatomical sites where issues of viral latency and persistence are crucial in understanding retrovirus and immune interactions.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
Non-human primates were used in strict accordance with UK Home Office guidelines, under a licence granted by the Secretary of State for the Home Office which approved the work described. Animal work at NIBSC is governed by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 that complies with the EC Directive 86/609 and performed under licence (PPL 80/1952) granted only after review of all procedures in the licence by the NIBSC local Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body. All study macaques were purpose bred and group-housed for the entire duration of the study, with daily feeding and access to water ad libitum. Given the limited availability of suitable macaques, age, sex and weight matching was not possible, nor central to the study outcome. Regular modifications to the housing area were made by husbandry staff including introduction of novel structures (eg swings and perching stations) and foodstuffs in novel manners to encourage foraging for food, to further enrich the study environment. The environmental temperature (15–24°C), was appropriate for macaques and rooms were subject to a 12 hour day/night cycle of lighting. Animals were acclimatised to their environment and deemed to be healthy by the named veterinary surgeon prior to inclusion on the study.
All animals were sedated with ketamine prior to bleeding or virus inoculation by venepuncture. Frequent checks were made by staff and any unexpected change in behaviour by individuals on study followed up, including seeking of veterinary advice where necessary. Regular blood evidence of incipient disease and veterinary advice were sought when persisting abnormalities detected. The study was terminated and all animals killed humanely by administering an overdose of ketamine anaesthetic prior to development of overt symptomatic disease. All efforts were made to minimise animal suffering, including provision of a high standard of housing quarters and monitoring of animal health and well-being and the absence of procedures not essential to the study.
Study outline and viruses
16 UK purpose-bred Indian rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) were used in the study, in accordance with UK Home Office guidelines (Code of Practice 1988) and local ethical approval. The basic construction and mode of action of the SIV-rtTAΔnef (SIVrtTA) vaccine, based on a SIVmac239 genetic backbone, is depicted in Fig 1A. In a challenge study experiment, eight macaques were inoculated intravenously with 5 x 103 TCID50 SIVrtTA vaccine receiving 100mg daily oral dosing with dox. In four macaques (Group A), dox was removed eight weeks prior to SIVmac239 wild-type challenge. In the remaining four SIVrtTA vaccinates (Group B) dox dosing was maintained at 100 mg daily oral dosing. Group C comprised four macaques inoculated with 104 TCID50 SIVmac239Δnef. All vaccinates were challenged with wild-type SIVmac239 in addition to four additional macaques which served as naïve challenge controls (Group D). The study outline is summarised in Fig 1B. Veterinary procedures deployed the use of ketamine hydrochloride prior to sedate macaques. Plasma concentrations of dox were monitored ex vivo using a previously described assay [41].
Host genetics
Macaques were genetically characterised for host MHC profiles, by Dr David Watkins (Univ. Wisconsin, S2 Table). Distribution of TRIM5α and TRIMcyp alleles was determined as previously described. Mamu7 represents macaques harbouring the TRIMcyp allele [42].
Quantitative SIV RNA and DNA levels and differential PCR
Initial quantitative measures were made in peripheral blood using quantitative gag-based real-time PCR assays as previously described [6]. Plasma vRNA levels were determined for EDTA-treated plasma samples with a limit of detection of 50 SIV RNA copies/ml and SIV DNA levels on PBMCs with limit of detection one SIV DNA copy/100,000 cell equivalents. SIVrtTA-specific levels were determined using primers designed to amplify a region of the rtTA gene using PCR conditions comparable to those described for the total gag estimations against an rtTA plasmid containing unique sequences to the rtTA gene. SIVrtTA-specific amplification sequences were CGCCGTGGGCCACTT (forward), and CTTTCCTCTTTTGCTACTTGATGCT (reverse); internal rtTA probe sequence was FAM-CACTGGGCTGCGTATTGGAGGAACAG-BHQ1; primers and probes were used at 100nM concentrations. Wild-type SIVmac239-specific amplifications were made with CTCAGGACCAGGAATTAGATACC (forward), AAGGGTCATCCCACTGGGAAGT (reverse) and internal probe sequence FAM-TCCCTGTAAATGTATCAGATGAGGCACAGGAGG-BHQ1 targeting the nef gene. Primers were used at 100nM and probe at 120nM concentrations. Detection limits of virus-specific amplification in plasma were determined to be 100 RNA copies/ml with an amplification efficiency of >98%.
Cell-associated RNA determinations were made for SIVrtTA, SIVmac239Δnef and wild-type SIVmac239 respectively by adapting a previously reported method [7]. Total RNA was isolated from spleen, mesenteric and peripheral lymph nodes using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen), subjected to on-column DNAase treatment in accordance with the manufacturers’ protocol. Virus-specific targets were amplified by one-step RT-PCR using 50ng total RNA input, adapting the SIVrtTA and SIVmac239 wild-type specific primers described above and employing those described previously in [43] for SIVmac239Δnef-specific amplification as follows: cttaggagaggtggaagatggatactc (forward), CTTTTCTTTTATAAAGTGAGACCTGTTCC (reverse) and internal probe sequence FAM- CAATCCCCAGGAGGATTAGACAAGGGCTTG -BHQ1. Primers were used at 300nM and probe at 75nM. All CA-RNA determinations were made using normalised values of GAPDH, in co-amplification reactions as described in [7]. All amplifications were performed with Invitrogen Ultrasense kits with a thermoprofile of RT step 52°C for 30 mins; 10 mins at 95°C then 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds and 60°C for 60 seconds. Limits of detection for SIVrtTA, SIVmac239Δnef, wild-type SIVmac239 CA-RNA assays were determined as 50, 34 and 80 SIV RNA copies per 50ng total RNA. All CA-RNA quantitative PCR assays had an efficiency of >95%, typically 98–99% efficiency of amplification. The SIVrtTA assays were validated using a plasmid construct denoted rtTAV16 diluted to an extinction end-point in quantitative assays.
Serology
Plasma anti-SIV p27 IgG responses were quantified by ELISA. Briefly, medium binding 96-well plates (Greiner, UK) were coated with 1μg/ml recombinant SIV p27 (CFAR, UK, Cat no: EVA664). Test plasma and standard positive and negative control samples were added to washed plates and bound IgG detected with goat anti monkey IgG-HRP (Serotec) followed by addition of substrate to induce a colour reaction in reactive samples.
Immunophenotyping and intracellular cytokine staining
Memory phenotype and intracellular cytokine staining were performed separately in each sample per animal due to limitations of the flow cytometry capability available. Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) were isolated using Percoll gradient centrifugation and mesenteric lymph node mononuclear cells (MNC) were isolated by mechanical disaggregation of tissue. To delineate memory T cell subsets, PBL were simultaneously surfaced stained with anti-CD3-V500 (clone SP32, BD Horizon), anti-CD4-V450 (clone L200, BD Horizon), anti-CD8-APCCy7 (clone SK1, BD Biosciences), anti-CD95-PECy7 (DX2, BioLegend), anti-CD28-PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBiosciences), and anti-CCR7-FITC (R&D systems). Gates on lymphocyte subpopulation were defined as central memory CD8+C95+CD28+CCR7- and CD8+CD95+CD28- CCR7- as effector memory.
SIV-specific T cell responses were determined by cytokine production after incubation with 5 μg/ml of either SIV Gag, Tat, Rev or (for MLN MNC additionally Nef peptides from the nef -unique coding region) (15mers overlapping 11 residues, CFAR/NIBSC, Potters Bar, UK) plus 10 μg/ml CD49d, 50μg/ml anti-CD28, Golgi Stop (10ng/ml, BD), and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 environment with RPMI 1640/10% FCS for 14h. Stimulated cells were surfaced stained for CD3, CD4 and CD8, permeabilised (Fix and Perm kit, Caltag), and then stained for intracellular cytokine detection with anti-IFNγ-PErCPCy5.5 (clone B27), anti-IL-2-PE (MQ1-17H21, eBiosciences), anti-TNF-α-APC (MAB11, eBiosciences) and anti-IL-17-Pacific Blue (BioLegend). Polyfunctional T cells were determined by a gating strategy as shown in the representative plots (S9 Fig). In detail, within CD4 and CD8 subsets, distribution of TNF-α and/or IL-2 producing cells were specified using contour FACs profile quadrants. Each quadrant within these cell populations were sequentially analysed for IFN-γ and/or IL-17 production in combinatory plots. For group comparisons (partial versus complete), total frequencies of ICS-stained cells were derived by adding mono, bi, tri and quadruple functional frequencies for each animal. The relative distribution of the cytokine producing cells in each animal was summarised in pie charts using SPICE software.
All peripheral and tissue derived mononuclear cells were acquired and analysed using a BD Canto II flow cytometer (BD Immunocytometry) with FACS DIVA software as described previously [26].
Graphing and statistical analysis
Graphing and associated statistical analyses, as specified, were performed using Sigma Plot 11 (Systat Software, Inc.). Kruskal-Wallis analyses of variance with Dunn’s post-hoc test were determined using the Minitab version 17 software. In addition, analysis and graphical representation of cytokine production were conducted using the data analysis programme Simplified Presentation of Incredibly Complex Evaluations (SPICE, version 5.3) provided by M. Roederer, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunochemical staining for Nef was performed with the KK77 antibody (CFAR; ARP3093) which is an IgG2a isotype raised to recombinant SIVmac251 Nef and which detects wild-type Nef only, using protocols as previously described [7].
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr RC Desrosiers, formerly Director of the New England Primate Center and now Professor of Pathology of University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA for the supply of SIVmac239Δnef vaccine and SIVmac239 challenge viruses. We thank Dr David Watkins, formerly University of Wisconsin, USA, and currently University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA for performing the host genetic typing, Dr Mario Roederer, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD for help with SPICE, and Programme EVA for the KK77 monoclonal antibody. We would also like to thank Mark Hassall, Bo Li, Irina Stetsenko and Jo Hall for additional technical expertise and contributions and Peter Rigsby for statistical advice.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by a grant from the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) https://www.iavi.org. awarded to BB, NA, MPC. MM and MPC were supported by the Sir Joseph Hotung Trust awarded to St Georges University London. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Koff WC, Johnson PR, Watkins DI, Burton DR, Lifson JD, et al. (2006). HIV vaccine design: insights from live attenuated SIV vaccines. Nat Immunol 7(1):19–23. 10.1038/ni1296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Daniel MD, Kirchhoff F, Czajak SC, Sehgal PK, Desrosiers RC. (1992). Protective effects of a live attenuated SIV vaccine with a deletion in the nef gene. Science 258:1938–1941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Almond N, Kent K, Cranage M, Rud E, Clarke B, et al. (1995) Protection by attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus in macaques against challenge with virus-infected cells. Lancet 345: 1342–1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cranage MP, Whatmore AM, Sharpe SA, Cook N, Polyanskaya N, et al. (1997) Macaques infected with live attenuated SIVmac are protected against superinfection via the rectal mucosa. Virology 229: 143–154. 10.1006/viro.1996.8419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abel K, Compton L, Rourke T, Montefiori D, Lu D, et al. (2003). Simian-human immunodeficiency virus SHIV89.6-induced protection against intravaginal challenge with pathogenic SIVmac239 is independent of the route of immunization and is associated with a combination of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte and alpha interferon responses. J Virol 77:3099–3118. 10.1128/JVI.77.5.3099-3118.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Berry N, Stebbings R, Ferguson D, Ham C, Alden J, et al. (2008). Resistance to superinfection by a vigorously replicating, uncloned stock of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVmac251) stimulates replication of a live attenuated virus vaccine (SIVmacC8). J Gen Virol 89:2240–2251 10.1099/vir.0.2008/001693-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berry N, Ham C, Mee ET, Rose NJ, Mattiuzzo G, et al. (2011). Early potent protection against heterologous SIVsmE660 challenge following live attenuated SIV vaccination in Mauritian cynomolgus macaques. PLoS One 6:e23092 10.1371/journal.pone.0023092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Connor RI, Montefiori DC, Binley JM, Moore JP, Bonhoeffer S, et al. (1998). Temporal analyses of virus replication, immune responses, and efficacy in rhesus macaques immunized with a live, attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus vaccine. J Virol 72:7501–7509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cranage MP, Whatmore AM, Sharpe SA, Cook N, Polyanskaya N, et al. (1997). Macaques infected with live attenuated SIVmac are protected against superinfection via the rectal mucosa. Virology 229:143–154. 10.1006/viro.1996.8419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fukazawa Y, Park H, Cameron MJ, Lefebvre F, Lum R, et al. (2012). Lymph node T cell responses predict the efficacy of live attenuated SIV vaccines. Nat Med (11):1673–81. 10.1038/nm.2934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Johnson RP, Lifson JD, Czajak SC Cole KS, Manson KH, et al. (1999). Highly attenuated vaccine strains of simian immunodeficiency virus protect against vaginal challenge: inverse relationship of degree of protection with level of attenuation. J Virol 73:4952–4961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mansfield K, Lang SM, Gauduin MC, Sanford HB, Lifson JD, et al. (2008). Vaccine protection by live, attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus in the absence of high-titer antibody responses and high-frequency cellular immune responses measurable in the periphery. J Virol 82:4135–4148. 10.1128/JVI.00015-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reynolds MR, Weiler AM, Weisgrau KL, Piaskowski SM, Furlott JR, et al. (2008). Macaques vaccinated with live-attenuated SIV control replication of heterologous virus. J Exp Med 205:2537–2550. 10.1084/jem.20081524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sharpe SA, Cope A, Dowall S, Berry N, Ham C, et al. (2004). Macaques infected long-term with attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVmac) remain resistant to wild-type challenge, despite declining cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to an immunodominant epitope. J Gen Virol 85:2591–2602. 10.1099/vir.0.80050-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sharpe SA, Whatmore AM, Hall GA, Cranage MP. (1997). Macaques infected with attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus resist superinfection with virulence-revertant virus. J Gen Virol 78 (8):1923–1927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nilsson C, Makitalo B, Thorstensson R, Norley S, Binninger-Schinzel D, et al. (1998) Live attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)mac in macaques can induce protection against mucosal infection with SIVsm. AIDS 12: 2261–2270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Miller CJ, McChesney MB, Lu X, Dailey PJ, Chutkowski C, et al. (1997) Rhesus macaques previously infected with simian/human immunodeficiency virus are protected from vaginal challenge with pathogenic SIVmac239. J Virol 71: 1911–1921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tenner-Racz K, Stahl Hennig C, Uberla K, Stoiber H, Ignatius R, et al. (2004) Early protection against pathogenic virus infection at a mucosal challenge site after vaccination with attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 3017–3022. 10.1073/pnas.0308677101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Whatmore AM, Cook N, Hall GA, Sharpe S, Rud EW, et al. (1995) Repair and evolution of nef in vivo modulates simian immunodeficiency virus virulence. J Virol 69: 5117–5123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mori K, Yasutomi Y, Ohgimoto S, Nakasone T, Takamura S, et al. (2001) Quintuple deglycosylation mutant of simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239 in rhesus macaques: robust primary replication, tightly contained chronic infection, and elicitation of potent immunity against the parental wild-type strain. J Virol 75: 4023–4028. 10.1128/JVI.75.9.4023-4028.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wyand MS, Manson K, Montefiori DC, Lifson JD, Johnson RP, Desrosiers RC. (1999). Protection by live, attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus against heterologous challenge. J Virol 73:8356–8363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ferguson D, Mattiuzzo G, Ham C, Stebbings R, Li B, Rose NJ, et al. (2014). Early biodistribution and persistence of a protective live attenuated SIV vaccine elicits localised innate responses in multiple lymphoid tissues. PLoS One. 9(8):e104390 10.1371/journal.pone.0104390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jia B, Ng SK, DeGottardi MQ, Piatak M, Yuste E, Carville A, et al. (2009). Immunisation with single-cycle SIV significantly reduces viral loads after an intravenous challenge with SIVmac239. PLoS Pathogens 5, 1, e1000272 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Das AT, Klaver B, Harwig A, Vink M, Ooms M, et al. (2007) Construction of a doxycycline-dependent simian immunodeficiency virus reveals a non-transcriptional function of tat in viral replication. J Virol 81: 11159–11169. 10.1128/JVI.01354-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Das AT, Klaver B, Centlivre M, Harwig A, Ooms M, et al. (2008) Optimization of the doxycycline-dependent simian immunodeficiency virus through in vitro evolution. Retrovirology 5: 44 10.1186/1742-4690-5-44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Manoussaka M, Berry N, Ferguson D, Stebbings R, Robinson M, et al. (2013). Conditionally-live attenuated SIV upregulates global T effector memory cell frequency under replication permissive conditions. Retrovirology 10:59 10.1186/1742-4690-10-59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhou X, Vink M, Klaver B, Berkhout B, Das AT. (2006). Optimization of the Tet-On system for regulated gene expression through viral evolution. Gene Ther. 13(19):1382–90. 10.1038/sj.gt.3302780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Das AT, Berkhout B. (2016) Conditionally replicating HIV and SIV variants. Virus Res. 2;216:66–75. 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Das AT, Klaver B, Berkhout B. (1997). Sequence variation of the human immunodeficiency virus primer-binding site suggests the use of an alternative tRNA(Lys) molecule in reverse transcription. J Gen Virol. 78: 837–40. 10.1099/0022-1317-78-4-837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Berkhout B, Das AT. (2015). On the primer binding site mutation that appears and disappears during HIV and SIV replication. Retrovirology. 12:75 10.1186/s12977-015-0201-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lim SY, Rogers T, Chan T, Whitney JB, Kim J, Sodroski J, Letvin NL. (2010). TRIM5α modulates Immunodeficiency Virus Control in Rhesus Monkeys. PLoS Pathog. 6(1):e1000738 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kirmaier A, Wu F, Newman RM, Hall LR, Morgan JS, O'Connor S, et al. (2010).TRIM5 suppresses cross-species transmission of a primate immunodeficiency virus and selects for emergence of resistant variants in the new species. PLoS Biol; 8(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kuate S, Stahl-Hennig C, ten Haaft P, Heeney J, Uberla K (2003). Single-cycle immunodeficiency viruses provide strategies for uncoupling in vivo expression levels from viral replicative capacity and for mimicking live-attenuated SIV vaccines. Virology. 313(2):653–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cecchinato V, Trinidade CJ, Lawrence A, Heraud JM, Brenchley JM, Ferrari MG, et al. (2008). Altered balance between Th17 and Th1 cells at mucosal sites predicts AIDS progression in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques. Mucosal Immunol. 1 (4): 279–288. 10.1038/mi.2008.14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nigam P, Kwa S, Velu V, Amara R (2011). Loss of IL-17-producing CD8 T cells during late chronic stage of pathogenic simian immunodeficiency virus infection. J. Immunol. 186: 745–753. 10.4049/jimmunol.1002807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xu H, Wang X, Veazey RS (2014). Th17 cells coordinate with Th22 cells in maintaining homeostasis of intestinal tissues and both are depleted in SIV-infected macaques. J. AIDS Clin. Res. 5(5): 302 10.4172/2155-6113.1000302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stone M, Ma ZM, Genescà M, Fritts L, Blozois S, McChesney MB, Miller CJ. (2009). Limited dissemination of pathogenic SIV after vaginal challenge of rhesus monkeys immunized with a live, attenuated lentivirus. Virology. 392(2):260–70. 10.1016/j.virol.2009.06.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Genescà M, Skinner PJ, Hong JJ, Li J, Lu D, McChesney MB, Miller CJ. (2008). With minimal systemic T-cell expansion, CD8+ T Cells mediate protection of rhesus macaques immunized with attenuated simian-human immunodeficiency virus SHIV89.6 from vaginal challenge with simian immunodeficiency virus. J Virol. 82(22):11181–96. 10.1128/JVI.01433-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Genescà M, Ma ZM, Wang Y, Assaf B, Qureshi H, Fritts L, et al. (2012). Live-attenuated lentivirus immunization modulates innate immunity and inflammation while protecting rhesus macaques from vaginal simian immunodeficiency virus challenge. J Virol. (17):9188–200 10.1128/JVI.00532-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Adnan S, Colantonio AD, Yu Y, Gillis J, Wong FE, Becker EA, et al. (2015). CD8 T cell response maturation defined by anentropic specificity and repertoire depth correlates with SIVΔnef-induced protection. PLoS Pathog.17;11(2):e1004633 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kleibeuker W, Zhou X, Centlivre M, Legrand N, Page M, Almond N, Berkhout B, Das AT. (2009) A sensitive cell-based assay to measure the doxycycline concentration in biological samples. Hum Gene Ther. 20(5):524–30. 10.1089/hum.2008.182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wilson SJ, Webb BL, Maplanka C, Newman RM, Verschoor EJ, Heeney JL, Towers GJ. (2008). Rhesus macaque TRIM5 alleles have divergent antiretroviral specificities.J Virol. 82(14):7243–7. 10.1128/JVI.00307-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Salisch NC, Kaufmann DE, Awad AS, Reeves RK, Tighe DP, Li Y, et al. (2010). Inhibitory TCR coreceptor PD-1 is a sensitive indicator of low-level replication of SIV and HIV-1. J Immunol. 1; 184(1):476–87. 10.4049/jimmunol.0902781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.van der Velden GJ, Vink MA, Berkhout B, Das AT. (2012). Tat has a dual role in simian immunodeficiency virus transcription. J Gen Virol. 93:2279–89. 10.1099/vir.0.044511-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.