Abstract
Mechanical stress and genetic factors play important roles in the occurrence of thoracic ossification of ligament flavum (TOLF), which can occur at one, two, or multiple levels of the spine. It is unclear whether single- and multiple-level TOLF differ in terms of osteogenic differentiation potency and osteogenesis-related gene expression under cyclic mechanical stress. This was addressed in the present study using patients with non-TOLF and single- and multiple-level TOLF (n=8 per group). Primary ligament cells were cultured and osteogenesis was induced by application of cyclic mechanical stress. Osteogenic differentiation was assessed by evaluating alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the mRNA and protein expression of osteogenesis-related genes, including ALP, bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), Runt-related transcription factor-2 (Runx-2), osterix, osteopontin (OPN) and osteocalcin. The application of cyclic mechanical stress resulted in higher ALP activity in the multiple-level than in the single-level TOLF group, whereas no changes were observed in the non-TOLF group. The ALP, BMP2, OPN and osterix mRNA levels were higher in the multiple-level as compared to the single-level TOLF group, and the levels of all osteogenesis-related genes, apart from Runx2, were higher in the multiple-level as compared to the non-TOLF group. The osterix and ALP protein levels were higher in the multiple-level TOLF group than in the other 2 groups, and were increased with the longer duration of stress. These results highlight the differences in osteogenic differentiation potency between single- and multiple-level TOLF that may be related to the different pathogenesis and genetic background.
Keywords: thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum, multi-level TOLF, single-level TOLF, osteogenic differentiation potency, genetic difference
Introduction
Ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) of the spine is characterized by ectopic bone formation in the ligament flavum and is highly prevalent in the population of East Asia, including the Japanese and Chinese populations (1–4). Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that OLF frequently occurs in the thoracic spine. Thoracic OLF (TOLF) progresses insidiously over a long period of time, resulting in devastating spinal cord injury that invariably leads to serious myelopathy. Many factors contribute to OLF, including genetic background, dietary habits, metabolic abnormalities and mechanical stress (5–7).
TOLF most often affects one or two levels of the spine and presents mainly in the lower thoracic spine (T10-T12) (8), which is a mobile transition region that may be more prone to degeneration owing to the high tensile forces in the posterior column. Axial mechanical overload and the consequent increase in repetitive tensile strain on ligamentum tissues contribute to TOLF (9). Additionally, we have previously found that mechanical stress induces the osteogenic differentiation of cells from patients with TOLF (6,10). Thus, local abnormal mechanical stress is thought to contribute to the progression of TOLF. However, there are also many cases of multiple-level TOLF in immobile, as well as mobile segments that differ from single-level lesions in terms of disease progression and clinical outcomes (11–13). On the basis of the whole clinical condition, we hypothesized that TOLF involving multiple levels extensively and TOLF in the circumscribed region may have a different pathogenesis. Probably on the account of the differences in genetic background, the osteogenic differentiation potency may be intrinsically greater in multiple-level TOLF than in single-level TOLF.
During osteogenic differentiation, transcription factors, such as osterix and Runt-related transcription factor-2 (Runx2) and osteogenesis-related genes, such as bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)2 regulate the expression of osteoblast markers, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteopontin (OPN), and osteocalcin (OCN) among others (7,14–16). Susceptibility genes, including collagen type VI alpha1 (COL6A1), BMP4 and major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha1 (HLA-DQA1) have also been shown to be associated with the occurrence of TOLF (17,18).
To date, single- and multiple-level TOLF have not been investigated as separate conditions and there have been no comparative studies examining differences in osteogenic differentiation potency and related gene expression, at least to the best of our knowledge. Only a similar and preliminary research was conducted on the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) (19). Thus, this was addressed in the present study using spinal ligament samples obtained from patients with single- and multiple-level TOLF in which osteogenic differentiation was induced by the application of cyclic mechanical stress.
Materials and methods
Clinical diagnosis and spinal ligament samples
The diagnosis of TOLF or non-TOLF (i.e., other thoracic diseases) was confirmed by pre-operative radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the whole spine. We previously established a TOLF classification scheme based on lesion distribution in MRI (20), as follows (Fig. 1): circumscribed (ossification in 2 or fewer adjacent levels), continuous (continuous ossification in 3 or more levels) and intermittent (intermittent distribution of local or continuous ossification). To assess genetic differences in the osteogenic differentiation potency among lesion types, a comparative analysis of single- and multiple-level TOLF (1 and ≥5 levels, respectively) was performed. Non-TOLF specimens were obtained from patients with other thoracic spine diseases, such as trauma or disc herniation, who had no ossification in any spinal ligaments. Spinal ligament tissue specimens and associated clinical diagnoses in this study are shown in Table I and Fig. 2. Single- and multiple-level TOLF and non-TOLF ligaments were aseptically obtained from patients during surgery and ligaments were obtained from non-ossified sites to avoid any possible contamination of osteogenic cells. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital (Beijing, China) and all patients provided written informed consent prior to obtaining the samples.
Table I.
Groups | Sample no.
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
Non-TOLF | ||||||||
Age/gender | 62/M | 44/F | 58/M | 52/M | 44/M | 42/M | 52/M | 43/F |
Diagnosis | T11-12 TDH | T8,10,12 fracture | T11-12 TDH | T12 fracture | T7-9 fracture | T12-L1 TDH | T12 fracture | T6-7 fracture |
Single-level TOLF | ||||||||
Age/gender | 54/M | 44/F | 65/F | 63/M | 69/F | 58/M | 43/F | 70/M |
Ossification level | T10-11 | T10-11 | T10-11 | T11-12 | T10-11 | T10-11 | T11-12 | T10-11 |
Multiple-level TOLF | ||||||||
Age/gender | 57/F | 59/F | 61/M | 68/M | 55/M | 59/F | 52/F | 58/F |
Classification | Intermittent | Intermittent | Continuous | Continuous | Intermittent | Intermittent | Intermittent | Intermittent |
Ossification level | T2-4, T5-7, T10-11 | T1-3,T8-11 | T1-8 | T2-8 | T2-5, T9-12 | T2-5,T8-11 | T2-6,T9-L1 | T2-3,6-7,8-12 |
Age is presented in year. TOLF, thoracic ossification of ligament flavum; TDH, thoracic disc herniation; M, male; F, female.
Cell culture
Cell culture was conducted as previously described (21). The ligament specimens were minced into 0.5-mm3 sections and digested with 0.25% trypsin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) for 1 h at 37°C followed by 200 U/ml type I collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 4 h at 37°C. The sections were maintained in low glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (all from Gibco) in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells derived from explants were passaged by digestion with 0.25% trypsin. Passage 3 cells were used for the experiments. The morphology of the primary cells was observed visually under a microscope (5221227/293232; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and images were obtained under the magnification of ×50, ×100 and ×200.
Application of mechanical stretch
The cells were trypsinized and placed on a silicon chamber coated with type I collagen (Flexcell International, Hillsborough, NC, USA) at a density of 10,000 cells/cm2 and after 3 days, the cells reached confluence. Firstly, the cells derived from 6 patients (TOLF and non-TOLF patients) and were subjected to cyclic mechanical stretch at 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20% by using a equi-biaxial cell-stretching apparatus (Flexcell FX-4000 Tension Plus System; Flexcell International) at 0.5 Hz and 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 for 12 and 24 h, and the optimal magnitude of stretch was determined according to the result. The optimal magnitude of stretch was then applied to cells from all the patients for 6, 12 and 24 h.
ALP activity assay
ALP activity was quantitatively analyzed using the LabAssay ALP kit (Wako, Osaka, Japan) and by staining using a commercial kit (Genmed, Shanghai, China). For the quantitative assay, total cellular protein was isolated from the cultured cells using radioimmunoprecipitation (RIPA) extraction buffer (Applygen Technologies, Beijing, China) and the concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method. The extracted protein solution was analyzed for ALP activity according to the manufacturer's instructions, with the activity reported relative to the protein concentration (U/mg). The cells were stained for ALP activity and ALP-positive cells were blue, while the counterstained nuclei appeared red. Micrographs of 10 random fields were obtained for analysis. Stained areas were measured using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA), and the ratio of stained cells to the number of total cells was determined.
Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted from the cell monolayers using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and 1 µg total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the GoScript Reverse Transcription System (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA). The primers used for amplification are listed in Table II. qPCR was performed in triplicate using SYBR-Green SuperReal PreMix Plus [Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China] and the iQ5 PCR system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min. Data are represented as cycle threshold (Ct) values. The RNA levels in different samples were compared using the 2−ΔΔCt method and were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) levels.
Table II.
Gene | Primer sequence | Product size (bp) | Annealing temperature (°C) |
---|---|---|---|
GAPDH | Forward: 5′-CAGGAGGCATTGCTGATGAT-3′ Reverse: 5′-GAAGGCTGGGGCTCATTT-3′ |
126 | 60 |
ALP | Forward: 5′-AAGGACGCTGGGAAATCTGT-3′ Reverse: 5′-GGGCATCTCGTTGTCTGAGT-3′ |
117 | 57 |
BMP2 | Forward: 5′-TCAAGCCAAACACAAACAGC-3′ Reverse: 5′-GGAGCCACAATCCAGTCATT-3′ |
105 | 55 |
Osterix | Forward: 5′-GAGGTTCACTCGTTCGGATG-3′ Reverse: 5′-TGGTGTTTGCTCAGGTGGT-3′ |
120 | 56 |
Runx2 | Forward: 5′-CCGTCCATCCACTCTACCAC-3′ Reverse: 5′-ATGAAATGCTTGGGAACTGC-3′ |
139 | 56 |
OCN | Forward: 5′-CTCACACTCCTCGCCCTATT-3′ Reverse: 5′-CGCCTGGGTCTCTTCACTAC-3′ |
143 | 58 |
OPN | Forward: 5′-GCCGTGGGAAGGACAGTTAT-3′ Reverse: 5′-GCTCATTGCTCTCATCATTGG-3′ |
114 | 56 |
ALP, alkaline phosphatase; BMP2, bone morphogenetic protein-2; Runx-2, Runt-related transcription factor-2; OPN, osteopontin; OCN, osteocalcin.
Western blot analysis
Total cellular protein was isolated from the cultured cells using RIPA extraction buffer and the concentration was determined by BCA assay. A total of 30 µg protein per well was separated by 10–15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, which were blocked for 2 h at 24–25°C with 5% BSA/TBST and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: rabbit monoclonal anti-BMP2 (1:1,000; ab183729), mouse monoclonal anti-osterix (1:1,000; ab57335), rabbit polyclonal anti-OPN (1:1,000; ab181440) and rabbit monoclonal anti-ALP (1:1,000; ab186422) (all from Abcam, Cambridge, UK); and mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH (1:2,000; BE0023; Bioeasytech, Beijing, China). Immunoreactivity was detected with IRDye 800cw-conjugated goat anti-rabbit/-mouse IgG (1:10,000; LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) secondary antibodies and visualized with an Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences), with gray values analyzed using Odyssey v3.0 software.
Statistical analysis
In this study, the data are presented as the means ± standard deviation and were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The mRNA expression data were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post hoc Dunnett's test (compared to 0 h in the non-TOLF group) and the post hoc Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. Other data sets were evaluated by ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. A value of P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Morphology of primary cells and determination of the optimal mechanical stress level
The primary cells in all 3 groups were long and spindle-shaped and exhibited fibrocyte-like adherent growth (Fig. 3A). Following exposure to different levels (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20%) of cyclic mechanical stress for 12 or 24 h, osteogenic potency was evaluated with the ALP activity assay. In the non-TOLF group, ALP activity remained constant at different levels of cyclic mechanical stress and periods of induction (Fig. 3B and C). However, ALP activity was increased in the TOLF group, particularly upon the application of 15% mechanical stress for 12 h (Fig. 3B) and 24 h (Fig. 3C). We therefore applied a mechanical stress of 15% for the subsequent experiments.
Changes in ALP activity induced by cyclic mechanical stress
In the absence of cyclic mechanical stress, ALP activity was higher in the multiple-level than in the single-level TOLF and non-TOLF groups (P<0.001). The activity was slightly higher in the single-level TOLF than in the non-TOLF group, although the difference was not statistically significant. At longer induction times, ALP activity increased in the 2 TOLF groups, with a greater increase observed in the multiple-level group (Fig. 4A).
There were almost no ALP-positive cells in the non-TOLF group regardless of stress application. However, there were many ALP-positive cells in the 2 TOLF groups even in the absence of stress, and their numbers increased with the application time, particularly in the multiple-level TOLF group (Fig. 4B–D). The semi-quantitative analysis of the stained area and positive cells yielded similar results (Fig. 4E and F).
Osteogenesis marker expression is upregulated at the mRNA level by cyclic mechanical stress
The mRNA levels of osteogenesis markers, including ALP, BMP2, osterix, Runx2, OCN and OPN were upregulated by cyclic mechanical stress in the single- and multiple-level TOLF groups, as determined by RT-qPCR. ALP expression was highest in the multiple-level TOLF group, followed by the single-level and non-TOLF groups at 0 h, and it increased over time in both TOLF groups with the application of stress; at 24 h, the ALP expression level was 2.1-fold higher in the multiple-level group than in the single-level group (Fig. 5A). Similar trends were observed for BMP2; at 24 h, the expression level was 2.3-fold higher in the multiple-level group than in the single-level group (Fig. 5B). The mRNA expression of osterix was highest in the multiple-level TOLF group at 0 h, followed by the single-level and non-TOLF groups, although the differences between the groups were not statistically significant. While the application of mechanical stress did not affect the single-level group, the expression level increased in the multiple-level TOLF group relative to the other 2 groups at 12 h, and was approximately 2.1-fold higher than that in the single-level TOLF group at 24 h (Fig. 5C). In addition, Runx2 expression was higher in the TOLF groups than in the non-TOLF group and it increased with stress application; at 0 and 24 h, the Runx2 transcript level was higher in the multiple-level group than in the single-level group (Fig. 5D). Likewise, OCN and OPN expression was higher in the TOLF groups than in the non-TOLF group (Fig. 5E and F), and it was increased by stress in the multiple-level TOLF group; OCN expression was 1.8-fold higher in the multiple-level group than in the single-level group at 24 h.
Pairwise comparisons among the 3 groups indicated that the expression of ALP, BMP2, osterix and OPN was higher in the multiple-level TOLF group than in the other 2 groups. OCN expression was higher in the multiple-level TOLF group than in the non-TOLF group, whereas there were no differences in Runx2 expression among the 3 groups. Moreover, the expression levels of all markers were similar between single-level and non-TOLF groups (Table III).
Table III.
Gene | Non-TOLF vs. single-level TOLF groups | Non-TOLF vs. multiple-level TOLF groups | Single-level TOLF vs. multiple-level TOLF groups |
---|---|---|---|
ALP | ns | P<0.001 | P<0.01 |
BMP-2 | ns | P<0.001 | P<0.001 |
Osterix | ns | P<0.01 | P<0.01 |
Runx2 | ns | ns | ns |
OCN | ns | P<0.05 | ns |
OPN | ns | P<0.001 | P<0.05 |
ns, not significant; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; BMP2, bone morphogenetic protein-2; Runx-2, Runt-related transcription factor-2; OCN, osteocalcin; OPN, osteopontin.
Osteogenic marker expression is upregulated at the protein level by cyclic mechanical stress
The protein levels of osteogenic markers were assessed by western blot analysis (Fig. 6A). ALP and osterix were more highly expressed in the multiple-level TOLF group than in the other 2 groups, and their expression increased with the application of mechanical stress to levels that were significantly higher at 12 h (Fig. 6B and C). The expression of both markers was higher in the single-level TOLF group than in the non-TOLF group. The BMP2 and OPN levels were higher in the TOLF groups than in the non-TOLF group. However, their levels in the single-level TOLF group were not altered with stress application (Fig. 6D and E).
Discussion
Many studies have demonstrated the critical role of mechanical stress in the development of TOLF (7,15,22–25). We previously reported that mechanical stress induced the osteogenic differentiation of ligament cells derived from patients with TOLF, which in turn promoted OLF, leading us to conclude that stress facilitated, but did not initiate the development of TOLF (10). In the present study, we used cyclic stress to induce osteogenesis in fibroblasts derived from non-TOLF and single and multiple-level TOLF in order to assess genetic differences in the osteogenic differentiation potency.
Although the morphology of ligament cells derived from the 3 groups was similar, the cells differed in terms of osteogenic potency, possibly due to cytogenetic differences. Ligament cells from patients with TOLF already possess certain osteoblast characteristics, including the upregulation of specific markers, whereas cells from non-TOLF patients exhibit a fibroblast phenotype (3,26–28). OCN and collagen type II are expressed in cells derived from patients with OLF, but not cells derived from non-OLF patients; cells derived from patients with OLF would thus present an osteoblast and chondrocyte phenotype (29). Another study reported that stress induced the mineralization of cells from patients with TOLF (10). These results demonstrate that cells from patients with TOLF have a greater potential for differentiation from fibroblasts to osteoblasts or chondrocytes.
Clinically, OLF mainly occurs in the thoracic spine, but rarely in the cervical and lumbar vertebrae that have a greater range of motion, which possibly indicates that ligament cells from patients with TOLF are sensitive to a certain range of cyclic mechanical stress in osteogenic induction. In addition, the degree of mechanical stress required for osteogenic induction has been investigated in several studies (30–32). For example, an equi-biaxial stretch chamber applying 9% mechanical stress was determined as optimal for inducing the differentiation of cells from patients with TOLF (10). On the other hand, 20% stress has been applied to cells from patients with TOLF and OPLL using the Flexcell FX-3000 and -4000 systems, respectively, although these studies did not explore the optimal range of mechanical stress (15,33). The differences between these devices, as well as the reactivity of cells derived from different tissues underscored the importance of exploring the optimal level of mechanical stress in the present study. ALP is a sensitive and specific indicator of the early stage of osteoblast differentiation (34); we found that 15% stress produced the highest ALP activity, indicating that this strength effectively induced osteogenesis of ligament cells from patients with TOLF. We also found that ALP activity was higher in the 2 TOLF groups than in the non-TOLF group, with the highest activity observed in the multiple-level group. Accordingly, a larger area of positive ALP staining, corresponding to a higher osteogenic potency, was observed in this group as compared to the single-level TOLF group.
BMP2 is an osteogenic factor that has been implicated in the ossification of the spinal ligament. BMP and its receptors have been found to be widely expressed in OLF tissues, but to be only partially expressed in the region connecting the ligamentum flavum and vertebrae in non-OLF tissues (35), leading these investigators to conclude that the aberrant expression of BMP and its receptors contributes to OLF. Similarly, another study reported an abundance of BMP2-positive fibroblasts distributed in areas of calcification and ossification in TOLF (14). In this study, we found that the BMP2 mRNA level was higher in the multiple-level group than in the single-level and non-TOLF groups at 0 h and that it increased with application of cyclic mechanical stress. These results demonstrate that BMP2 plays an important role in the osteogenic differentiation of cells from patients with TOLF and that differences in expression may account for the distinct prognoses of single- and multiple-level TOLF.
Runx2 is a transcription factor that regulates osteoblast differentiation. In a previous study, Runx2 expression was found to be higher in OLF than in the control and was mainly expressed in hyperplastic and hypertrophic cartilage cells (7). In another study, cyclic tensile strain applied for 24 h increased Runx2 and OPN mRNA levels in cells from OLF sections, whereas similar mechanical stress had negligible effects on cells from non-OLF sections (15). In the present study, Runx2 expression was similar in the multiple- and single-level TOLF, and higher than that in the non-TOLF group, indicating that Runx2 expression cannot be used as a marker for distinguishing the osteogenic potency of single- and multiple-level TOLF.
Osterix is a transcription factor activated upon mechanical stress that regulates the transcription of osteogenesis-related genes. Our previous study showed that mechanical stress induced osterix and Runx2 overexpression in TOLF cells (10). It has also been reported that osterix is more highly expressed in OLF- than in non-OLF-derived cells and is mainly distributed in cartilage cells located in the calcified cartilage and fibrocartilage layers (7). Osterix has been shown to promote osteoblast differentiation and mineralization at a heterotopic site (36). In this study, osterix expression was higher in the multiple-level group as compared to the single-level TOLF group at 0 h and increased with the application of mechanical stress in the former, but not in the latter group, suggesting that osterix can serve as a marker for multiple-level TOLF.
OCN is an extracellular matrix protein that reflects the status of the process of osteogenesis (37). OPN is secreted as an adhesive glycophosphoprotein and modulates matrix mineralization in mechano-transduction (38). Previous studies have reported that OCN and OPN expression increase with the application of mechanical stress. This was confirmed by the results presented in this study: at an early stage of mechanical stress, the OCN and OPN levels were comparable in the 2 TOLF groups; however, over time, the levels were upregulated to a greater degree in the multiple-level than in the singe-level group. This indicates that the osteogenic differentiation of multiple-level TOLF-derived cells is more active under the application of cyclic mechanical stress.
Clinically, multiple-level TOLF differs from single-level lesions in terms of disease progression and clinical outcomes, and multiple-level TOLF has a poor prognosis and may continue to develop after surgical resection (12,39,40), suggesting that the osteogenic potency may be differ between them, which is consistent with our experimental results. There were some limitations to this study. Firstly, the mechanistic basis for differences in osteogenic potency between multiple- and single-level TOLF requires more detailed investigation, such as bioinformatics analysis of gene expression profiles, and we aim to do this in future studies. In addition, in the current study, we examined changes in osteogenic potency and gene expression in cells from patients with TOLF in response to mechanical stress in vitro, and did not consider other types of stress that are present in vivo, including compression, twisting and shear forces. Therefore, additional studies using an in vivo TOLF model are required.
In conclusion, this study demonstrated that ligament cells from patients with TOLF were sensitive to a certain range of mechanical stress in osteogenic differentiation. Single- and multiple-level TOLF differed in terms of osteogenic potency and related gene expression under cyclic stress, with the latter exhibiting a greater potency for osteogenic differentiation that may be related to the different pathogenesis of them and contribute to the different clinical outcome.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81272031, 81071505 and 81572101). We acknowledge the assistance of Peking University Third Hospital Central Laboratory with the technical guidance.
Abbreviations
- TOLF
thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum
- ALP
alkaline phosphatase
- BMP2
bone morphogenetic protein 2
- OPN
osteopontin
- OCN
osteocalcin
- COL6A1
collagen type VI alpha1
- HLA-DQA1
major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ α1
- OPLL
ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
- RIPA
radio-immunoprecipitation
- BCA
bicinchoninic acid
- Ct
cycle threshold
- GAPDH
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- ANOVA
one-way analysis of variance
References
- 1.Sato T, Kokubun S, Tanaka Y, Ishii Y. Thoracic myelopathy in the Japanese: Epidemiological and clinical observations on the cases in Miyagi Prefecture. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1998;184:1–11. doi: 10.1620/tjem.184.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guo JJ, Luk KD, Karppinen J, Yang H, Cheung KM. Prevalence, distribution, and morphology of ossification of the ligamentum flavum: A population study of one thousand seven hundred thirty-six magnetic resonance imaging scans. Spine. 2010;35:51–56. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b3f779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kudo S, Ono M, Russell WJ. Ossification of thoracic ligamenta flava. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141:117–121. doi: 10.2214/ajr.141.1.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lang N, Yuan HS, Wang HL, Liao J, Li M, Guo FX, Shi S, Chen ZQ. Epidemiological survey of ossification of the ligamentum flavum in thoracic spine: CT imaging observation of 993 cases. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:857–862. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2492-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mobbs RJ, Dvorak M. Ossification of the ligamentum flavum: diet and genetics. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14:703–705. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fan D, Chen Z, Chen Y, Shang Y. Mechanistic roles of leptin in osteogenic stimulation in thoracic ligament flavum cells. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:29958–29966. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611779200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Uchida K, Yayama T, Cai HX, Nakajima H, Sugita D, Guerrero AR, Kobayashi S, Yoshida A, Chen KB, Baba H. Ossification process involving the human thoracic ligamentum flavum: Role of transcription factors. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R144. doi: 10.1186/ar3458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Okada K, Oka S, Tohge K, Ono K, Yonenobu K, Hosoya T. Thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the ligamentum flavum. Clinicopathologic study and surgical treatment. Spine. 1991;16:280–287. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199103000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Maigne JY, Ayral X, Guérin-Surville H. Frequency and size of ossifications in the caudal attachments of the ligamentum flavum of the thoracic spine. Role of rotatory strains in their development. An anatomic study of 121 spines. Surg Radiol Anat. 1992;14:119–124. doi: 10.1007/BF01794886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fan D, Chen Z, Wang D, Guo Z, Qiang Q, Shang Y. Osterix is a key target for mechanical signals in human thoracic ligament flavum cells. J Cell Physiol. 2007;211:577–584. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gao R, Yuan W, Yang L, Shi G, Jia L. Clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients with thoracic myelopathy caused by multilevel ossification of the ligamentum flavum. Spine J. 2013;13:1032–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kawaguchi Y, Yasuda T, Seki S, Nakano M, Kanamori M, Sumi S, Kimura T. Variables affecting postsurgical prognosis of thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the ligamentum flavum. Spine J. 2013;13:1095–1107. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li F, Chen Q, Xu K. Surgical treatment of 40 patients with thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4:191–197. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.4.3.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yayama T, Uchida K, Kobayashi S, Kokubo Y, Sato R, Nakajima H, Takamura T, Bangirana A, Itoh H, Baba H. Thoracic ossification of the human ligamentum flavum: Histopathological and immunohistochemical findings around the ossified lesion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7:184–193. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/08/184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cai HX, Yayama T, Uchida K, Nakajima H, Sugita D, Guerrero AR, Yoshida A, Baba H. Cyclic tensile strain facilitates the ossification of ligamentum flavum through β-catenin signaling pathway: In vitro analysis. Spine. 2012;37:E639–E646. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318242a132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim HN, Min WK, Jeong JH, Kim SG, Kim JR, Kim SY, Choi JY, Park BC. Combination of Runx2 and BMP2 increases conversion of human ligamentum flavum cells into osteoblastic cells. BMB Rep. 2011;44:446–451. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2011.44.7.446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kong Q, Ma X, Li F, Guo Z, Qi Q, Li W, Yuan H, Wang Z, Chen Z. COL6A1 polymorphisms associated with ossification of the ligamentum flavum and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 2007;32:2834–2838. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b761c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu Y, Zhao Y, Chen Y, Shi G, Yuan W. RUNX2 polymorphisms associated with OPLL and OLF in the Han population. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:3333–3341. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1511-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kudo H, Furukawa K, Yokoyama T, Ono A, Numasawa T, Wada K, Tanaka S, Asari T, Ueyama K, Motomura S, Toh S. Genetic differences in the osteogenic differentiation potency according to the classification of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Spine. 2011;36:951–957. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e9a8a6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chen ZQ, Dang GT, Liu XG, Cai QL. The choice of treatment for ossification of ligamentum flavum of the thoracic spine. Chin J Orthop. 1999;19:197–200. In Chinese. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yin X, Chen Z, Guo Z, Liu X, Yu H. Tissue transglutaminase expression and activity in human ligamentum flavum cells derived from thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum. Spine. 2010;35:E1018–E1024. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e198ab. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ahn DK, Lee S, Moon SH, Boo KH, Chang BK, Lee JI. Ossification of the ligamentum flavum. Asian Spine J. 2014;8:89–96. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.1.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tsukamoto N, Maeda T, Miura H, Jingushi S, Hosokawa A, Harimaya K, Higaki H, Kurata K, Iwamoto Y. Repetitive tensile stress to rat caudal vertebrae inducing cartilage formation in the spinal ligaments: A possible role of mechanical stress in the development of ossification of the spinal ligaments. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5:234–242. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.3.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Iwasawa T, Iwasaki K, Sawada T, Okada A, Ueyama K, Motomura S, Harata S, Inoue I, Toh S, Furukawa KI. Pathophysiological role of endothelin in ectopic ossification of human spinal ligaments induced by mechanical stress. Calcif Tissue Int. 2006;79:422–430. doi: 10.1007/s00223-006-0147-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nakatani T, Marui T, Hitora T, Doita M, Nishida K, Kurosaka M. Mechanical stretching force promotes collagen synthesis by cultured cells from human ligamentum flavum via transforming growth factor-beta1. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:1380–1386. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00046-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hoshi K, Amizuka N, Sakou T, Kurokawa T, Ozawa H. Fibroblasts of spinal ligaments pathologically differentiate into chondrocytes induced by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: Morphological examinations for ossification of spinal ligaments. Bone. 1997;21:155–162. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00106-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Iwasaki K, Furukawa KI, Tanno M, Kusumi T, Ueyama K, Tanaka M, Kudo H, Toh S, Harata S, Motomura S. Uni-axial cyclic stretch induces Cbfa1 expression in spinal ligament cells derived from patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Calcif Tissue Int. 2004;74:448–457. doi: 10.1007/s00223-002-0021-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ishida Y, Kawai S. Characterization of cultured cells derived from ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. Bone. 1993;14:85–91. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90232-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhong ZM, Chen JT. Phenotypic characterization of ligamentum flavum cells from patients with ossification of ligamentum flavum. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50:375–379. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.3.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tanno M, Furukawa KI, Ueyama K, Harata S, Motomura S. Uniaxial cyclic stretch induces osteogenic differentiation and synthesis of bone morphogenetic proteins of spinal ligament cells derived from patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments. Bone. 2003;33:475–484. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00204-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ohishi H, Furukawa K, Iwasaki K, Ueyama K, Okada A, Motomura S, Harata S, Toh S. Role of prostaglandin I2 in the gene expression induced by mechanical stress in spinal ligament cells derived from patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;305:818–824. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.047142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Furukawa K. Current topics in pharmacological research on bone metabolism: Molecular basis of ectopic bone formation induced by mechanical stress. J Pharmacol Sci. 2006;100:201–204. doi: 10.1254/jphs.FMJ05004X4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang W, Wei P, Chen Y, Yang L, Jiang C, Jiang P, Chen D. Down-regulated expression of vimentin induced by mechanical stress in fibroblasts derived from patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:2410–2415. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3394-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pagani F, Francucci CM, Moro L. Markers of bone turnover: Biochemical and clinical perspectives. J Endocrinol Invest. 2005;28(Suppl 10):8–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hayashi K, Ishidou Y, Yonemori K, Nagamine T, Origuchi N, Maeda S, Imamura T, Kato M, Yoshida H, Sampath TK, et al. Expression and localization of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and BMP receptors in ossification of the ligamentum flavum. Bone. 1997;21:23–30. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00080-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fu H, Doll B, McNelis T, Hollinger JO. Osteoblast differentiation in vitro and in vivo promoted by Osterix. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;83:770–778. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Komaki M, Karakida T, Abe M, Oida S, Mimori K, Iwasaki K, Noguchi K, Oda S, Ishikawa I. Twist negatively regulates osteoblastic differentiation in human periodontal ligament cells. J Cell Biochem. 2007;100:303–314. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ishijima M, Tsuji K, Rittling SR, Yamashita T, Kurosawa H, Denhardt DT, Nifuji A, Ezura Y, Noda M. Osteopontin is required for mechanical stress-dependent signals to bone marrow cells. J Endocrinol. 2007;193:235–243. doi: 10.1677/joe.1.06704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Inamasu J, Guiot BH. A review of factors predictive of surgical outcome for ossification of the ligamentum flavum of the thoracic spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5:133–139. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.2.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.He S, Hussain N, Li S, Hou T. Clinical and prognostic analysis of ossified ligamentum flavum in a Chinese population. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3:348–354. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.3.5.0348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]