Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Dec 23;6:38677. doi: 10.1038/srep38677

Geometrical vortex lattice pinning and melting in YBaCuO submicron bridges

G P Papari 1,*, A Glatz 2,3,*, F Carillo 4, D Stornaiuolo 1,5, D Massarotti 5,6, V Rouco 1, L Longobardi 6,7, F Beltram 2, V M Vinokur 2,a, F Tafuri 5,6,b
PMCID: PMC5180090  PMID: 28008911

Abstract

Since the discovery of high-temperature superconductors (HTSs), most efforts of researchers have been focused on the fabrication of superconducting devices capable of immobilizing vortices, hence of operating at enhanced temperatures and magnetic fields. Recent findings that geometric restrictions may induce self-arresting hypervortices recovering the dissipation-free state at high fields and temperatures made superconducting strips a mainstream of superconductivity studies. Here we report on the geometrical melting of the vortex lattice in a wide YBCO submicron bridge preceded by magnetoresistance (MR) oscillations fingerprinting the underlying regular vortex structure. Combined magnetoresistance measurements and numerical simulations unambiguously relate the resistance oscillations to the penetration of vortex rows with intermediate geometrical pinning and uncover the details of geometrical melting. Our findings offer a reliable and reproducible pathway for controlling vortices in geometrically restricted nanodevices and introduce a novel technique of geometrical spectroscopy, inferring detailed information of the structure of the vortex system through a combined use of MR curves and large-scale simulations.

Superconductors are materials in which below the superconducting transition temperature, Tc, electrons form so-called Cooper pairs, which are bosons, hence occupying the same lowest quantum state1. The wave function of this Cooper condensate has a fixed phase. Hence, by virtue of the uncertainty principle, the number of Cooper pairs in the condensate is undefined. As a result, the collective motion of the Cooper-pair condensate occurs without scattering (the scattering would have served a mean for counting Cooper pairs), i.e., without power dissipation2. This fundamental feature instrumental to technological applications of superconductivity is destroyed by magnetic vortices, tiny filaments of the magnetic field that penetrate the technologically important type-II superconductors. Vortices move under an applied current and destroy the global phase coherence leading to electric losses. Thus, immobilizing vortices, i.e., the problem of vortex pinning, is central to application-focused studies of superconductors3.

Superconducting bridges offer an irreplaceable laboratory for uncovering vortex properties. In an early work4 Parks and Moshel observed an oscillating magnetoresistance in what at the time were “extremely narrow” superconducting film strips of the order of 1 μm wide and 100 nm thick in a perpendicular magnetic field, and justly guessed, well ahead of their time, that the oscillations were due to the sequential penetration of vortex rows into the strips. Now it is well established that if the strip is too narrow, vortices cannot enter the strip at all, but if the width is about a few coherence lengths, ξ, then vortices arrange themselves in a single and subsequently in distinct rows5,6,7. Moreover, if the strip is short enough, then an entry or an exit of even a single vortex might be visible in transport measurements8,9,10,11.

In narrow strips vortex behaviour is highly sensitive to the underlying interplay between geometrical restrictions and details of vortex arrangement5. A remarkable feature of the strips is that they allow to gain insight into the microscopic vortex behaviour combining numerical simulations of the vortex system and transport measurements12. Here we adopt the same integrated approach. Carrying out simultaneous numerical simulations, magnetotransport measurements, and visualizing the vortex penetration and dynamics in the strip, we calibrate the fingerprints of the magnetoresistance. This enables us to directly juxtapose the observed features of the magnetoresistance with the microscopic behaviours of the vortex system. We unambigously relate the resistance oscillations with the sequential penetration of vortex rows, separated by regions of geometrical pinning, and reveal the fingerprints of the magnetoresistance that evidence vortex lattice melting in the strip.

We carry out systematic transport measurements on high quality YBCO submicron bridges at both low and high magnetic fields. We observe oscillations of the magnetoresistance with a period corresponding to the penetration of additional vortex rows. We detect melting of the vortex lattice and identify the flow of the pinned vortex liquid controlled by plastic deformation of the vortex matter13.

Experimental Techniques

The sample fabrication is described in the Methods section. In order to explore the entire vortex phase diagram, we controllably degrade the samples. Varying parameters during each fabrication step of the ion milling procedure14,15,16 (i.e. the baking temperature of the photoresist, the duration of each single etching step and the interval between two of them, the cooling temperature of the sample during ion milling, and the power of the ion beam), we tune the oxygen desorption to achieve the desirable Tc, Jc and Hc17,18,19. Specifically, the oxygen desorption is tuned to have a transition to the superconducting state of about 50 K (see R(T) in Fig. 1, the transition temperature is defined by the middle of the drop in R(T)) to enable measurements in a wide range of temperatures (T ≥ Tc). This allows to explore the vortex dynamics under the conditions ranging from the pinned to the flux flow state, yet remaining within a relatively small magnetic field range that is much smaller than the one in bulk samples (hundreds of Tesla). The dynamics of the vortex lattice and the vortex phase diagram remain unaltered, scaled to lower critical fields and temperatures3,15,20. Measurements are taken on the bridges with the width, w, lying in the interval 200 nm < w < 300 nm, their length being typically about 700 nm. Shown in Fig. 1 is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of an exemplary 230 nm wide sample. Finally, transport measurement are performed using a Helium-3 cryostat (HELIOX Oxford Instruments) equipped with different filter stages (for more details, see Methods).

Figure 1. Sample setup S.E.M. image of the 230 nm wide sample.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Inset (a) scheme of the magnetoresistance setup, l = 700 nm, d = 50 nm, w = 230 nm. Inset (b) Log-linear plot of the resistance, R(T) in the temperature range (30–90) K.

Experimental Results

Figure 2a shows a 3D surface plot of the differential magnetoresistance as a function of the temperature and magnetic field. One clearly sees the distinct peaks which do not change their position noticeably with variation of temperature. Shown in the inset of Fig. 2b are the representative data taken at two temperatures, 36.0 K and 39.8 K and moderate magnetic fields up to 1.2 T displaying the peculiar structure of the nonmonotonic behaviour of the MR. The peaks of the MR curves signal sequential penetration of the vortex rows into the strip7, as confirmed by numerical simulations (see below). The decreasing magnetoresistance immediately after the formation of the every next penetrating vortex row, reflects that with increasing field the vortex rows grow denser eventually merging into a central, nearly normal channel7. One further observes that peaks that correspond to the penetration of the second and third rows, nearly merge. Then there is a significant drop in the resistance before the fourth row enters. The relatively low peak that marks the appearance of the fourth row suggests that the four-row configuration experiences quite strong geometric pinning. The highest peak corresponds to the formation of the fifth vortex row, indicating that the five-rows configuration is unstable.

Figure 2. Magnetoresistance and vortex configurations.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Experimental MR of the 230 nm wide sample, in log-linear scale as a function of temperature. Important to note is that the position of the peaks does not change much with temperature. (b) Simulated MR of a 2D system with dimensions similar to those of the experimental system. The simulated temperature is lower than that in the experiment leading to sharper peaks, which are realized at higher fields. The periodicity and the relative peak heights are however reproduced correctly. The inset shows comparable experimental curves at 36 K and 39.8 K at low fields. (c) Vortex configurations at the peaks of the simulated MR curve. The peaks of the MR mark the appearance of a new vortex row entering the strip. The plots show isosurfaces of the superconducting order parameter amplitude and a color plot of the order parameter density as projection on the bottom.

The large field behaviour is illustrated in Fig. 3, where panel a) demonstrates the full range MR as a function of the magnetic field at representative temperatures. The character of the MR behaviour changes at about B = 3 T, as fully accounted by numerical simulations as shown in Fig. 3b, where the MR in log scale is reported as a function of the magnetic field. The plot log(Rs) vs. B demonstrates a noticeable kink and change of the slope at 3 T (Rs denotes the dimensionless, simulated MR).

Figure 3. Full magnetic field range of experimental and simulated MR curves.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Measured MR curves at different temperatures in linear-log representation. (b) Simulated MR curves (linear-log plot). The red line indicates the limit of the numerical resolution. The inset shows a comparable MR curve obtained at 39.8 K along with its first derivative, which helps to detect MR oscillations at high fields.

To gain an insight into the nature of this behaviour, we plot the number of vortices Nv as a function of the magnetic field in Fig. 4a. Nv is estimated as Inline graphic⌊1+w/a0⌋(L/a0), where w and L are the width and the length of the strip respectively, and Inline graphic is the mean distance between vortices at B ≫ Bc1 ∝ Φ0/w2, see refs 21,22. It is also assumed that w ≫ ξ, and ⌊x⌋ denotes the integer part of x. At Inline graphic T the behavior of Nv(B) changes to a continuous increase (which is easier seen in the simulations, Fig. 4, inset), where vortices do not enter as complete new rows, but rather individually. Furthermore, at about the same field there is a kink in the magnetic field dependence of the number of rows. The high-field part of the Nr(B) dependence is well approximated by Nr = 1 + 1.3w/a0.

Figure 4. Vortex lattice melting transition.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) The number of nucleated fluxons as a function of the applied magnetic field. The points shown by triangles, circles, and squares are recorded at 36.0 K, 39.8 K, and 46.5 K, respectively. The (red) dashed line is a linear fit of the data at 39.8 K. Inset: the number of the entered vortex rows as a function of B. The dashed curve is the function Inline graphic where Inline graphic which represents the theoretical trend expected for an ordered vortex lattice. (b) Analysis of the simulated vortex lattices as a function of field. The plot shows the topological defect concentration (vortices with number of closest neighbours different from 6) obtained by Delaunay triangulation. The edge rows are not taken into account, such that the curve starts when the third row is formed. The scattering plot shows a typical run, and the red curve is an average of 12 runs with the different random initial configurations. When the vortex lattice starts moving at B ~ 3T the defect concentration shows a maximum (a typical vortex configuration at the maximum is shown at the top right corner). The inset shows the vortex number as a function of the magnetic field. At low fields, below the dynamic transition the vortex number shows a clear step-like behaviour when new vortex rows appear. At high fields the vortex number increases continuously. Two typical vortex lattice triangulations are shown in panel (c) (topological defects having 5 and 7 nearest neighbors are highlighted by red and blue circles, respectively, on the left.)

Numerical Results and Discussion

To shed the light to the observed MR oscillations and gain insight into the behaviour of the system, we perform large-scale numerical simulations of a two-dimensional superconducting strip, with parameters of the experimental YBCO bridge, using the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations23 (see Methods for technical details). Taking the zero-temperature coherence length of YBCO as ξ0 = 1.5 nm, we discretized the system in 1024 × 320 grid points having a physical size of Inline graphic or 720 nm × 225 nm, close to that of the experimental system. A dimensionless current, measured in units of the depairing current, equaling to 0.05 (see Methods), is applied along the x-direction and a perpendicular magnetic field in z-direction is slowly increased from 0 to 0.1Bc2,0. This field range spans the interval from 0 T to 14.5 T for the simulated system. At each field increment, the system is allowed to relax into a steady state and then the voltage along x-direction, proportional to the magneto-resistance (MR), i.e. Rs = ∂xμ, where μ is the scalar potential, is calculated. In YBCO the depairing current is ~300MA/cm2. Due to the method of measurement (see Methods), the way the magnetoresistance is obtained and its magnitude cannot be directly compared to the simulation.

To enable the observation of the MR oscillations, the simulations are performed at temperatures that are lower than those of the real experiment since the required averaging times for higher temperatures would have been prohibitively long. Yet, both the periodicity and relative peaks heights observed in the experiment are nicely reproduced in the simulations, see Fig. 2b. Note, the peak corresponding to the second vortex row has a smaller “side-peak”. This is due to the weak vortex interaction and the resulting slow formation of a hexagonally ordered double row. Therefore, it happens that the field is increased before the two rows are perfectly formed. At the simulated temperature, a full relaxation would take a very long time and becomes impractical. In fact, this instability of the second row can also explain the strong overlap of the second and third row peaks in the experiment. This overlap also causes those two peaks to apparently move closer to each other. The inset shows comparable experimental data and the corresponding simulated peaks are indicated by dashed arrows; note that because of the significantly higher temperatures in the experiment, the experimental peaks are much broader than their numerical counterparts and the first row can penetrate the experimental bridge at much lower fields as thermal fluctuations lead to a reduction of the surface barrier. The peaks in the MR mark the appearance of additional vortex rows with increasing field (see also Supplementary Movie). The mechanism behind the MR peak is that the formation of each additional row is the result of a second order phase transition between the different vortex states analogous to the well known transition at Bc1 between the vortex-free and Shubnikov phases7,5. This implies that an increase of the MR due to suppression of the surface barrier for the vortex exit changes into a drop of the MR right after a new row emerges. The reason is that upon increasing the field, the newly formed vortex array gets denser, the regions with suppressed order parameter overlap more, thus the potential well for vortices in the inner part of the strip gets deeper. This deepening overweights the suppression of the surface barrier, hence the peak in the MR at the moment of the formation of the extra row7. Upon further increase of the field the suppression of the barrier becomes more important again, the growth of the MR wins again, and the process repeats itself. We stress here that since peaks in the MR correspond to well defined phase transitions in the vortex structure, these are the peaks of the MR (and not the minima) that have a clear physical meaning.

The vortex configurations at fields of the formation of new rows are shown in Fig. 2c as isosurfaces of the complex order parameter amplitude with a density projection at the bottoms. The behaviour of the simulated MR in the full range of the fields is presented in Fig. 3b as linear-log plots showing the transition to the resistive state at ~3T. The horizontal (red) line indicates the limit of the numerical resolution such that the shaded region below is not relevant. Above ~1T, in the yellow highlighted magnetic field range of the MR curve, vortex rows penetrate the system separated by field intervals in which the vortex lattice is geometrically arrested. At higher fields (highlighted in red) the system becomes resistive.

To further gain detailed knowledge about the nature of the structural transitions in the vortex system, we analyzed the evolution of the vortex configurations upon increasing the magnetic field by using Delaunay’s triangulation. The kink in the MR at 3 T shown in Fig. 4 strikingly resembles the manifestation of the so-called disorder-induced melting (DIM) predicted in refs 24,25. According to ref. 25 an increasing magnetic field enhances the destabilizing effect of the standard point-like disorder (e.g. oxygen vacancies in cuprates) on the vortex lattice. Thus at a certain magnetic field the topological defect-free, perfect vortex lattice transforms into a highly dislocated amorphous vortex configuration, where the vortex dynamics is governed by the motion of dislocations26. The DIM transition is characterized by the production of multiple dislocations. In contrast to disordered superconductors, in the strip the destabilizing role of pinning is taken by the edges of the strip, confining the vortex system and enforcing the symmetry different from the inherent symmetry of the vortex lattice and, therefore, generating stress in the vortex system near the edges. We conjecture that at some field BCIM the confinement-induced melting (CIM) occurs in the vortex system. At this field, the generation of multiple topological defects (dislocations) starts near the edges, which together with the applied current forms dislocations and a new dynamic amorphous vortex phase. These dislocations are realized as a vacancy-interstitial pair propagating across the strip. The activated motion of vortices in this phase is controlled by the energy of the plastic deformation Inline graphic, where ε0 is the energy of the vortex core and Inline graphic is the vortex lattice spacing. The dependence of the density of topological defects in the vortex lattice (i.e. the concentration of vortices with number of nearest neighbours other than six) on the magnetic field is shown in Fig. 4b. For the analysis, only vortices within rows having both neighboring rows on either side are taken into account. Therefore, the curve starts with the appearance of three rows since “edge” rows have no well defined number of neighbors in the used triangulation scheme. One sees that in the low field regime, for static vortex lattices, the number of defects increases. A maximum of defects is reached just before the system becomes resistive. In the dynamic state at higher fields the defect concentration decreases again due to dynamic annealing of defects in the inner part of the strip. The transition to the dynamic state is clearly seen in the number of vortices present in the system vs. magnetic field in the inset of Fig. 4b)], which is discrete at low fields with steps at the fields where additional rows appear in the system and continuous at high fields. Again, due to the lower temperature in the simulation, this effect is more pronounced than in the experiment, Fig. 4a. At this point we remark that disorder in form of e.g. inhomogeneities, grain boundaries, or surface defects can also influence the shape and location of the magnetoresistance peak. The experimental system is prepared from high quality films and shaped carefully. Furthermore, the results of our measurements indicate that there is no strong disorder which could play an important role, since our measurements were conducted in the resistive regime, where the applied current exceeds the depinning critical current. Weak pinning effects are not detectable since they need large spatial scales well exceeding the width of the strip in order to manifest themselves3. Additionally, the simulations of clean systems reproduce the main features – in particular, the envelope curve for the number of vortices follows the dependence expected in the clean state without surfaces. However, to check how disorder influences the simulations, we studied multiple scenarios of disorder by introducing various types of δTc defects (i.e., spatial modulation of the critical temperature within the sample, meaning the linear coefficient, ε, in the TDGL equation): An amorphous structure and potential grain boundaries were modeled by weak random quenched noise, and Voronoi tessellation, tiling the domain with small polygons (of order of a few coherence lengths) with randomly chosen critical temperature close to the bulk Tc. Other possible inhomogeneities or distortions of the surface, were simulated by weak localized defects. While all these defects can add slightly to the broadening and shift of the peaks, the effects of thermal noise — especially close to the experimental value — dominates the peak structure. In any case, the oscillation period of the magnetoresistance is still determined by the sample geometry only.

Panel Fig. 4c shows snapshots of the vortex configuration with overlaid triangulation corresponding the low-field and high field amorphous phases, respectively. The field dependence of the activation energy Up at T = 44 K is shown in Fig. 5. One sees that at B > BCIM indeed Inline graphic exactly as expected for vortex dynamics governed by the plastic deformations of the vortex system. Of course, the high field part of the curve where Up becomes less than the temperature of the experiment should be taken with utmost reservation since the very concept of activated motion does not apply in this field range. However, in the proper field interval where Up > T, the fit shows perfect agreement with the measurement.

Figure 5. Plastic Energy Up as a function of the magnetic field.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

The gray dashed line is a Inline graphic fit demonstrating that the data is consistent with the expected behaviour due to plastic deformation resulting from vortex shear13,28,29. The straight green dashed line corresponds to the temperature T = 44 K of the experiment.

Conclusion

Our integrated experimental-numerical study of the vortex transport in the presence of a perpendicular magnetic field in a superconducting strip reveals the fingerprints of a low-field oscillatory magnetoresistance due to the peculiar interplay between the symmetry enforced by confinement or geometrical pinning and the inherent symmetry of vortex configuration corresponding to 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-rows vortex phases. This opens an opportunity for a novel tool: characterization of the field-dependent vortex configuration through magnetresistance spectroscopy - analyzing measurements of the R(B) dependence together with large-scale simulations. At elevated fields we discovered a novel dynamic phase transition in the confined vortex system, confinement-induced melting, i.e., transition from the topologically perfect vortex configuration to an amorphous one saturated with dislocations. The oscillation period of the magnetoresistance of ~250 mT and the magnetic field at which the CIM occurs, are reproduced by the simulations.

Methods

Sample fabrication

The nanobridges are fabricated via processing a 50 nm thick YBCO film (in c-direction) covered by a 20 nm thick gold (Au) layer. Films are deposited by a thermal evaporation technique on yttrium stabilized zirconia substrates (YSZ) (Ceraco ceramic coating GmbH). The titanium (Ti) mask on the Au layer is prepared by the standard electron beam lithography and lift off procedures. Cold (−150 °C) ion milling is used to remove Au/YBCO from regions not protected by the Ti mask16. The Au top layer is finally removed by a further step of ion milling. Further details on the fabrication process are reported in ref. 14. Our measurements are performed on bare YBCO nanobridges (without Au cap layer), differently from what commonly done on YBCO nanowires which are always protected by Au to enhance as much as possible the critical current density.

Measurements

Each type of filter is anchored at an independent temperature stage of the cryostat to work as low pass band filters with cutoff frequency ν0 < νT = kBT/h, which represents the thermal noise level where kB and h are the Boltzmann and the Planck constants respectively. A handmade copper powder filter has been thermalized in the helium 3 pot of the cryostat, while π-filters have been anchored at the 1 K-pot. A further stage of commercial EMI filters has been used at 300 K, just after the voltage amplifier, to shield signals against electromagnetic environment. Current-voltage (I–V) curves are obtained via injecting an oscillating (about 7 Hz) current and acquiring an averaged (roughly 100 times) voltage curve through an oscilloscope (LeCroy WAVERUNNER 6100 A). Both the magnetoresistance and temperature, R(T), dependences, are taken employing a lock-in amplifier, feeding the sample with a current modulated at 17.3 Hz. Excitation signals were of the order of 300 nA to avoid heating and/or excessive perturbation of vortex dynamics27 effects. Magnetic field step was about ΔB = 10 mT, i.e., one tenth of the expected Bc1 (see below). The setup for the zero bias MR’s is sketched in the Fig. 1(a).

Simulation parameters

All simulations were performed using the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations

graphic file with name srep38677-m8.jpg
graphic file with name srep38677-m9.jpg

There equations were solved numerically by an implicit finite-difference method. Here ψ is the superconducting order parameter, A = (−Bz,0,0)y is the vector potential corresponding to the applied magnetic field Bz perpendicular to the strip, j is the current density and μ is the scalar potential, ε = (Tc − T)/T, T is the temperature, Tc is the critical temperature. Note, that in this scaling, the zero-temperature coherence length ξ0 is the unit of length, the second critical field Bc2(T = 0) the unit for the field, and the unit of j is Inline graphic, resulting in a depairing current density jdp for B = 0 is given by Inline graphic.

The simulated strip is discretized by a square grid with resolution ξ0/2 – this is sufficient for the TDGL description and finer resolutions do neither change our results nor have any physical meaning, as microscopic theories are needed in that case (which are unsuitable to study vortex dynamics on larger length scales numerically). Thus for ξ0 ≈ 1.5 nm we need 1024 × 320 grid points to represent a system of physical size Inline graphic or 720 nm × 225 nm.

The simulated sample is periodic in the current direction (x) and superconductor/vacuum boundary conditions for the superconducting order parameter ψ, ∂yψ = 0, are imposed at the surfaces in the shorter transverse direction, y. In order to collect sufficient statistics the results for the MR are averaged over 20 runs with the different random initial conditions.

For details on the algorithm and definition of all parameters, see ref. 23. The simulations were performed on Nvidia Tesla K20X GPUs.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Papari, G. P. et al. Geometrical vortex lattice pinning and melting in YBaCuO submicron bridges. Sci. Rep. 6, 38677; doi: 10.1038/srep38677 (2016).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep38677-s1.pdf (596.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The experimental work was supported by COST. The computational and theoretical work was supported by the Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program funded by U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research and Basic Energy Science, Division of Materials Science and Engineering.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions The experiments were performed by G.P.P., F.C., D.S., D.M., V.R., L.L. F.B., F.T. Simulations and theory were done by A.G. and V.M.V. The paper was written by G.P.P., A.G., V.M.V., and F.T. The figures were done by A.G., G.P.P., and T.F.

References

  1. Tinkham M. Introduction to superconductivity ((2ed., McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1996), New York). [Google Scholar]
  2. Baturina T. I. & Vinokur V. M. Superinsulator-superconductor duality in two dimensions. Ann. Phys. 331, 236–257 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  3. Blatter G., Feigel’man M. V., Geshkenbein V. B., Larkin A. I. & Vinokur V. M. Vortices in high-temperature superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1125–1388 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  4. Parks R. D. & Mochel J. M. Evidence for quantized vortices in a superconducting strip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 354–358 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  5. Saint-James D., Thomas E. & Sarma G. Type II Superconductivity ((Pergamon 1969), Oxford). [Google Scholar]
  6. Palacios J. J. Vortex lattices in strong type ii superconducting two-dimensional strips. Phys. Rev. B 57, 10583 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  7. Córdoba R. et al. Magnetic field-induced dissipation-free state in superconducting nanostructures. Nature Communications 4, 1437 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pekker D., Refael G. & Goldbart P. M. Weber blockade theory of magnetoresistance oscillations in superconducting strips. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 017002 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johansson A., Sambandamurthy G., Shahar D., Jacobson N. & Tenne R. Nanowire acting as a superconducting quantum interference device. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 116805 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Atzmon Y. & Shimshoni E. Superconductor-insulator transitions and magnetoresistance oscillations in superconducting strips. Phys. Rev. B 83, 220518 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  11. Morgan-Wall T., Leith B., Hartman N., Rahman A. & Marković N. Measurement of critical currents of superconducting aluminum nanowires in external magnetic fields: Evidence for a weber blockade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 077002 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Besseling R., Kes P. H., DrÃse T. & Vinokur V. M. Depinning and dynamics of vortices confined in mesoscopic flow channels. New Journal of Physics 7, 71 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  13. Vinokur V. M., Feigel’man M. V., Geshkenbein V. B. & Larkin A. I. Resistivity of high-tc superconductors in a vortex-liquid state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 259–262 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Papari G. et al. Ybco nanobridges: Simplified fabrication process by using a ti hard mask. Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on 19, 183–186 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  15. Carillo F. et al. Little-parks effect in single nanoscale YBa2Cu3O6+x rings. Phys. Rev. B 81, 054505 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  16. Papari G. et al. High critical current density and scaling of phase-slip processes in ybacuo nanowires. Superconductor Science and Technology 25, 035011 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaiser D. L., Holtzberg F., Scott B. A. & McGuire T. R. Growth of yba2cu3ox single crystals. Applied Physics Letters 51, 040–1042 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  18. Wuyts B., Moshchalkov V. V. & Bruynseraede Y. Resistivity and hall effect of metallic oxygen-deficient Yba2Cu3Ox films in the normal state. Phys. Rev. B 53, 9418–9432 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tolpygo S. K., Lin J.-Y., Gurvitch M., Hou S. Y. & Phillips J. M. Universal tc suppression by in-plane defects in high-temperature superconductors: Implications for pairing symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 53, 12454–12461 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gammel P. Condensed-matter physics: Why vortices matter. Nature 411, 434–435 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Saint-James D., Sarma G. & Thomas E. Type II Superconductivity. Commonwealth and International Library. Liberal Studies Division (Elsevier Science & Technology, 1969). [Google Scholar]
  22. Stan G., Field S. B. & Martinis J. M. Critical field for complete vortex expulsion from narrow superconducting strips. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 097003 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sadovskyy I. A., Koshelev A. E., Phillips C. L., Karpeyev D. A. & Glatz A. Stable large-scale solver for Ginzburg-Landau equations for superconductors. J. Comp. Phys. 294, 639–654 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  24. Ertas D. & Nelson D. R. Irreversibility, mechanical entanglement and thermal melting in superconducting vortex crystals with point impurities. Physica C 272, 79–86 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  25. Vinokur V. et al. Lindemann criterion and vortex-matter phase transitionsin high-temperature superconductors. Physica C 295, 209–217 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  26. Kierfeld J., Nordborg H. & Vinokur V. M. Theory of plastic vortex creep. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4948–4951 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Papari G. et al. Dynamics of vortex matter in {YBCO} sub-micron bridges. Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 506, 188–194 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  28. Kokanović I., Helzel A., Babić D., Sürgers C. & Strunk C. Effect of vortex-core size on the flux lattice in a mesoscopic superconducting strip. Phys. Rev. B 77, 172504 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  29. Brandt E. H. The flux-line lattice in superconductors. Reports on Progress in Physics 58, 1465 (1995). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep38677-s1.pdf (596.2KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES