Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards
. 1988 Jun 1;93(3):311–312. doi: 10.6028/jres.093.057

An Instrument for Determination of Energy Oxygen and BOD5

Leonard L Ciaccio 1, Klaus Hameyer 2
PMCID: PMC5181900

“The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) determination is an empirical test in which standardized laboratory procedures are used to determine the relative oxygen requirement of waste waters, effluents and polluted waters [1].” This method has several well-known drawbacks, i.e., 5-day duration of the test, lack of correspondence of the BOD bottle to the biological system of the receiving water body, and the nonquantitative nature of the BOD test [2]. Each of these factors seriously compromises the present testing procedure. The length of the analysis time, which is generally 5 days, makes the test practically useless [2,3] in real-time control of pollution, and the prescribed condition of carrying out the test at a constant temperature of 20 °C is an inconvenience.

The objective of this investigation was to develop an instrument which would measure biological oxygen demand by some parameter which was meaningfully related to the oxygen depleting activity of waste waters, precise, and of short measurement duration (1 hour or less). The variable chosen was energy oxygen, a thermodynamic value related to the substrate free energy of oxidation in cell synthesis [28].

Two factors, energy oxygen and endogenous oxygen, comprise ultimate biochemical oxygen demand [2,3,4]. Five-day BOD (BOD5), may not necessarily exert the ultimate biochemical oxygen demand because 5 days may be too short a time for complete stabilization by the bacteria. Thus we can summarize

BOD ultimate=Energy Oxygen+Endogenous OxygenBOD5may be some percentage of BOD ultimate

Energy Oxygen, EO, is that amount of oxygen needed in energy reactions to provide synthesis of new biological cells and/or biologically stable organic substances from organic matter (bacterial food or organic pollutant) until none of the organic matter remains. This process is relatively rapid compared to endogenous respiration (consumption of endogenous oxygen) [3,4].

Endogenous Oxygen is that amount of oxygen used in reducing cellular materials to stable end products by a cyclic degradation process consisting of cell lysis—cell synthesis—cell lysis. Thus, a mass of bacterial cells is reduced ultimately to a relatively stable mass where life is maintained. This is a relatively slow process whose rate and extent of bacterial colony size is dependent on temperature. Thus the standard BOD5 is determined at a given temperature, 20 °C, to obtain reproducible results.

The ABODA instrument, an acronym for automated biochemical oxygen demand analyzer, consists of an analyzing system and subsidiary systems which supply a measured volume of sample, standardize the dissolved oxygen probe and recorder scale, etc. The analyzer system is a loop containing an aeration cell in which the sample diluted with water is saturated with air, a pump, a Biological Reactor, a dissolved oxygen (DO) probe and finally, the aeration cell. The diluted sample is pumped around this loop, and the saturated DO level achieved in the aeration cell is decreased due to the interaction of the microorganisms in the Biological Reactor, the DO and the pollutant sample (food). The decreased DO level is measured by the DO probe. The signal from the DO probe is traced out on a recorder. An electronic integrator gives the area under the curve which represents the amount of oxygen consumed by the microorganisms in response to the sample [5,8]. This value is proportional to the energy oxygen. The energy oxygen is calculated using several factors such as a calibration factor for the electrode, scaling factor for the integrator, flow rate in the analysis system and sample size.

The EO diagram is obtained from the ABODA instrument, and the EO is obtained by integrating the area under the curve and calculating as follows:

EO=(Area, mg of02/L)×(time,tfti,min)×(flow rate, mL/min)/(volume of sample, mL)

The correlation of EO and BOD5 values for five different concentrations of glucose—glutamate standards is given in table 1. A regression analysis resulted in a correlation coefficient, r2, of 0.99.

Table 1.

Correlation of EO and BOD, for glucose-glutamate

BOD5
mg/L
EO  
mg/L
217 63.5, 57.9, 63.9
160 41.6
108 31.6
58.6 12.3, 15
27 7.8, 6.3

A series of raw sewage and primary (1°) effluent samples obtained from two different waste treatment plants were analyzed for their EO and BOD5 values (see table 2). Plant R is a small domestic treatment plant with flow rates from 3 to 5 MGD, while plant BC treats a mixture of domestic and industrial wastes with a flow rate of about 100 MGD. A correlation coefficient, r2, of 0.92 was obtained in a regression analysis of these data.

Table 2.

Correlation studies of waste samples

Plant Sample EO BOD5
R Raw 4.49 50.5
BC Raw 5.91 61.0
BC Raw 4.52 49.8
R Raw 6.11 75.3
R 3.21 34.1
BC 5.90 39.8

A number of secondary effluent samples from three different plants were analyzed for their EO and BOD5 values. Some of these values fall on a “best fit” line. However more extensive testing is needed to allow regression analysis for secondary effluent samples.

In all the EO determinations carried out in this investigation, the analysis time was an hour or less. The overall precision of EO analyses by the ABODA instrument and BOD5 is given as weighted average % relative standard deviation value in table 3.

Table 3.

Weighted average of 1% rel. std. dev. data

Sample EO BOD5
%Rel. s.d. No. analyses %Rel. s.d. No. analyses
Glucose-glutamate ±4.3   67 ±4.4   29
Waste samples ±6.1 106 ±9.6 111
Weighted avg. ±5.4 173 ±8.5 140

In summary, the ABODA instrument measures EO which is correlated with BOD5, precise (±5.4% SD), and it accomplishes an analysis in 1 hour.

References

  • 1.Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 14th ed. Am Public Health Assoc; New York: 1976. p. 543. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stack VT., Jr . In: Water and Water Pollution Handbook. Ciaccio LL, editor. Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, Inc; New York: 1972. Chap. 15. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McCarty PL. Thermodynamics of Biological Synthesis and Growth; Proc. 2nd Int. Water Pollution, Res. Conf.; Tokyo. 1964; Pergamon: 1965. p. 169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Servizi JA, Bogan RH. J Sanit Eng Div Am Soc Civil Engrs. 1963;89:17. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bhatla MN, Stack VT, Jr, Weston RF. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1966;38:601. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee EW, Oswald WJ. Sewage Industrial Wastes. 1954;26:1097. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vernimmen AP, Henken ER, Lamb JC. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1967;39:1006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stack VT. Determination of Rate of Consumption of Gases Dissolved in Liquids. British Patent. 1968;1(132):456. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ciaccio LL, Hameyer Klaus. Method and Apparatus for Automated Measurement of Energy Oxyen. 4,063,792. US Patent. 1978

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES