Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1991 Jun 15;88(12):5119–5123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5119

Resistance to the Bacillus thuringiensis bioinsecticide in a field population of Plutella xylostella is due to a change in a midgut membrane receptor.

J Ferré 1, M D Real 1, J Van Rie 1, S Jansens 1, M Peferoen 1
PMCID: PMC51823  PMID: 2052591

Abstract

The biochemical mechanism for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins was studied in a field population of diamondback moths (Plutella xylostella) with a reduced susceptibility to the bioinsecticidal spray. The toxicity and binding characteristics of three crystal proteins [CryIA(b), CryIB, and CryIC] were compared between the field population and a laboratory strain. The field population proved resistant (greater than 200-fold compared with the laboratory strain) to CryIA(b), one of the crystal proteins in the insecticidal formulation. Binding studies showed that the two strains differ in a membrane receptor that recognizes CryIA(b). This crystal protein did not bind to the brush-border membrane of the midgut epithelial cells of the field population, either because of strongly reduced binding affinity or because of the complete absence of the receptor molecule. Both strains proved fully susceptible to the CryIB and CryIC crystal proteins, which were not present in the B. thuringiensis formulation used in the field. Characteristics of CryIB and CryIC binding to brush-border membranes of midgut epithelial cells were virtually identical in the laboratory and the field population.

Full text

PDF
5119

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Biber J., Stieger B., Haase W., Murer H. A high yield preparation for rat kidney brush border membranes. Different behaviour of lysosomal markers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Oct 2;647(2):169–176. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(81)90243-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldman I. F., Arnold J., Carlton B. C. Selection for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies israelensis in field and laboratory populations of the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Invertebr Pathol. 1986 May;47(3):317–324. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(86)90102-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hindley J., Berry C. Bacillus sphaericus strain 2297: nucleotide sequence of 41.9 kDa toxin gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 May 11;16(9):4168–4168. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.9.4168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hofmann C., Lüthy P., Hütter R., Pliska V. Binding of the delta endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis to brush-border membrane vesicles of the cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae). Eur J Biochem. 1988 Apr 5;173(1):85–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13970.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hofmann C., Vanderbruggen H., Höfte H., Van Rie J., Jansens S., Van Mellaert H. Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins is correlated with the presence of high-affinity binding sites in the brush border membrane of target insect midguts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):7844–7848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.7844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Honée G., van der Salm T., Visser B. Nucleotide sequence of crystal protein gene isolated from B. thuringiensis subspecies entomocidus 60.5 coding for a toxin highly active against Spodoptera species. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Jul 11;16(13):6240–6240. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.13.6240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Höfte H., Soetaert P., Jansens S., Peferoen M. Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of new Lepidoptera-specific crystal protein gene from Bacillus thuringiensis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Sep 25;18(18):5545–5545. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.18.5545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Höfte H., Whiteley H. R. Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Rev. 1989 Jun;53(2):242–255. doi: 10.1128/mr.53.2.242-255.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Höfte H., de Greve H., Seurinck J., Jansens S., Mahillon J., Ampe C., Vandekerckhove J., Vanderbruggen H., van Montagu M., Zabeau M. Structural and functional analysis of a cloned delta endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis berliner 1715. Eur J Biochem. 1986 Dec 1;161(2):273–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb10443.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McGaughey W. H. Insect Resistance to the Biological Insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis. Science. 1985 Jul 12;229(4709):193–195. doi: 10.1126/science.229.4709.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Munson P. J., Rodbard D. Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. Anal Biochem. 1980 Sep 1;107(1):220–239. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90515-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Perlak F. J., Deaton R. W., Armstrong T. A., Fuchs R. L., Sims S. R., Greenplate J. T., Fischhoff D. A. Insect resistant cotton plants. Biotechnology (N Y) 1990 Oct;8(10):939–943. doi: 10.1038/nbt1090-939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roush R. T., McKenzie J. A. Ecological genetics of insecticide and acaricide resistance. Annu Rev Entomol. 1987;32:361–380. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.32.010187.002045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Van Rie J., Jansens S., Höfte H., Degheele D., Van Mellaert H. Receptors on the brush border membrane of the insect midgut as determinants of the specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 May;56(5):1378–1385. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.5.1378-1385.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Rie J., Jansens S., Höfte H., Degheele D., Van Mellaert H. Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Importance of specific receptors on the brush border membrane of the mid-gut of target insects. Eur J Biochem. 1989 Dec 8;186(1-2):239–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Van Rie J., McGaughey W. H., Johnson D. E., Barnett B. D., Van Mellaert H. Mechanism of insect resistance to the microbial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis. Science. 1990 Jan 5;247(4938):72–74. doi: 10.1126/science.2294593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wolfersberger M. G. The toxicity of two Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins to gypsy moth larvae is inversely related to the affinity of binding sites on midgut brush border membranes for the toxins. Experientia. 1990 May 15;46(5):475–477. doi: 10.1007/BF01954236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES