Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Jan;25(1):185–191. doi: 10.1002/oby.21705

INSIGHT Responsive Parenting Intervention is Associated with Healthier Patterns of Dietary Exposures in Infants

Emily E Hohman 1, Ian M Paul 2, Leann L Birch 3, Jennifer S Savage 1,4
PMCID: PMC5189916  NIHMSID: NIHMS823620  PMID: 28008749

Abstract

Objective

To determine if a responsive parenting (RP) intervention affects infant dietary patterns.

Methods

Primiparous mother-newborn dyads (n=291) were randomized to the INSIGHT RP intervention or control. Curricula were delivered at nurse home visits at ages 3, 16, 28, and 40 weeks. RP group feeding guidance advised responsive feeding, delayed introduction of solids, repeated exposure to novel foods, and age-appropriate portion sizes. Latent class analysis identified patterns of dietary exposure at 9 months. Class membership at 9 months was used to predict BMI percentile at 2 years.

Results

Five dietary patterns were identified: “Breastfed, Fruits and Vegetables”, “Breastfed, Low Variety”, “Formula, Fruits and Vegetables (FFV)”, “Formula, Low Variety (FLV)”, and “Formula, High Energy Density (FHED)”. Over 60% of infants had patterns low in fruits and vegetables or high in energy-dense foods. RP group infants were less likely than control to be in the FLV class (OR=0.40, 95% CI 0.23–0.71) or FHED class (OR=0.28, 95% CI 0.12–0.61) relative to the FFV class. Dietary pattern at 9 months was significantly associated with BMI percentile at 2 years.

Conclusion

While a majority of infants consumed diets low in fruits and vegetables, the INSIGHT RP intervention was associated with healthier dietary patterns.

Keywords: infancy, diet, patterns, responsive parenting, intervention, obesity

Introduction

Composition of the infant diet changes substantially in the first year after birth (1). Initially, infants consume only breastmilk and/or infant formula. Later in the first year, a variety of dietary patterns begin to emerge as infants are introduced to complementary foods (1, 2). Caregiver decisions on what, when, and how to feed their infant during this transition period influence food preferences, eating behaviors (3), and dietary patterns later in childhood (4, 5), making infancy a critical time for promoting healthy dietary patterns. Descriptive data on infant dietary intake from the Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (FITS) show that patterns of dietary intake vary widely across children and over time (2). However, less is known about how infants’ emerging dietary patterns are related to obesity risk, and whether early intervention with parents can modify infant diet.

The Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a responsive parenting (RP) intervention designed for the primary prevention of obesity (6). Mothers in the intervention received guidance on RP, which is defined as developmentally appropriate, prompt, and contingent on their infant’s needs, in the areas of feeding, sleep, emotion regulation, and active social play. We have previously reported that infants randomized to the INSIGHT RP intervention had slower weight gain during the first 6 months after birth, a lower mean weight-for-length percentile at 1 year of age, and a reduced prevalence of overweight at 1 year (7). The purpose of the current analysis was to determine if the INSIGHT RP intervention was associated with healthier patterns of dietary intake in later infancy (age 9 months) when infants are consuming both complementary foods and breastmilk and/or formula, and whether these dietary patterns were associated with later weight status.

In a recent study, Rose et al. (8) used latent class analysis (LCA), a person-centered approach, to explore infant dietary patterns. In contrast to variable-centered approaches, which focus on relationships between variables across individuals, person-centered approaches like LCA focus on distinct patterns of variables within individuals (9), allowing subgroups of individuals with different combinations of common characteristics to be identified. Using this approach, 5 subtypes of infants were identified based on dietary patterns characterized by different combinations of milk-feeding (breastfed, formula-fed or mixed) and complementary foods. Results revealed that infants whose diets were characterized as Mixed High Energy Density were more likely to be overweight at 1 year than those in the other classes (e.g., “Breastfed Fruits and Vegetables”, “Breastfed Low Variety”, “Formula-Fed Fruits and Vegetables”, “Formula-Fed Low Variety”) (8). The objectives of the present analysis were to use the same LCA approach to 1) identify patterns of milk and complementary feeding among 9-month-old infants participating in the INSIGHT study, 2) explore the effect of maternal and infant characteristics on dietary pattern class membership, 3) determine whether dietary pattern class membership differed between RP and control groups, and 4) assess the relationship between dietary pattern class membership at 9 months and body mass index (BMI) at 2 years.

Methods

Study design

Primiparous mothers and their healthy, term, singleton newborns were recruited from a maternity ward in central Pennsylvania. At 10–14 days postpartum, mother-infant dyads were randomized (n=291) to a RP intervention or child safety control intervention. 279 participants completed the first study visit at 3–4 weeks after birth and are considered the final study cohort for all analyses as specified in the study protocol (6). At 3, 16, 28, and 40 weeks after birth, nurses visited participants’ homes to deliver the intervention curricula. The RP curriculum focused on four infant behavioral states: Drowsy, Sleeping, Fussy, and Alert (6). Specific messages on feeding taught parents to recognize hunger and satiety cues, to offer age-appropriate foods and portion sizes, to use food for hunger only and not as a reward, punishment or to soothe a distressed but not hungry child, to use repeated exposure to promote acceptance of foods, the importance of modeling healthy eating behaviors, shared feeding responsibility, and establishment of routines and limits. The control group received age-appropriate child safety information. Safety messages related to feeding focused on food safety and choking prevention. Additional details on eligibility, screening, and curriculum have been previously published (6). This study was approved by the Human Subjects Protection Office of the Penn State College of Medicine, and was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov prior to the first participant’s enrollment.

Measures

Data were collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) (10). Demographic predictors, including education, income, and marital status were collected from participants at enrollment. Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, and gestational weight gain, and infant sex, birth weight, and gestational age were extracted from medical records. Childcare use and maternal employment status were collected from mothers during interviews with research staff.

Infant dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) at age 9 months (11). Mothers were asked to indicate how often their child consumed 121 food and beverage items in the previous week, as well as the number of feedings per day of breastmilk and formula. Variables for LCA were created by dichotomizing intake of each food group using the method of Rose et al (8). Infants were classified as predominantly breastfed at 9 months if ≥80% of total milk feeds consisted of breastmilk (1). Likewise, predominantly formula-fed at 9 months was defined as ≥80% of total milk feeds from formula. Other food and beverage groups were dichotomized based on meeting or not meeting the recommended servings per day of each food for 8–11 month old infants in childcare, using the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) recommendations (12).

Child weight and height were measured by a nurse blinded to study group at a 2 year clinic visit. Weight was measured in duplicate to the nearest 0.1 kg using an electronic scale (Seca 354, Hanover, MD). Height was measured in duplicate to the 1 cm using a portable stadiometer (Shorr Productions, Olney, MD). Age- and gender-specific BMI percentiles and z-scores were calculated using CDC standards (13). BMI percentile is a recommended and widely-used indicator of adiposity in children ≥2 years of age, with overweight and obesity defined as BMI in 85th–94th percentile and ≥95th percentile, respectively (14).

Statistical analysis

LCA was used to identify discrete, mutually exclusive latent classes based on the infant FFQ data. LCA was performed using PROC LCA (15); this SAS procedure and its user’s guide are available at http://methodology.psu.edu. Models with one through seven latent classes were compared to identify the best fitting model using fit criteria including the G2 fit statistic, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and bootstrap likelihood ratio test (BLRT) (16). To test for both main effects of covariates and interactions with study group, covariates were entered one at a time into an LCA model along with a dummy coded variable for study group and an interaction with study group. To aid in interpretability, effects of covariates were also tested by assigning participants to the class corresponding to their maximum posterior probability in the initial LCA model without covariates, and then then testing for differences between classes using ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test for continuous variables or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Covariates that were significant individually were entered into a final LCA model along with study group assignment, and the overall effect of study group on class membership was determined from the log-likelihood test in the LCA model. Participants were assigned to classes using the final model with covariates using the classify-analyze approach described by Bray et al (17).

Finally, dietary class membership at 9 months was used to predict BMI at age 2 years, using a generalized linear model. All analyses were performed in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), and significance was accepted at p≤0.05 and adjusted for multiple comparisons where appropriate.

Results

Participant Characteristics

Participants were predominantly white, non-Hispanic, and married, and were on average well-educated and higher income (Table 1). There were no differences between the RP and control groups in any of the demographic variables examined, nor was there a significant difference in attrition by study group. Approximately a third of the total sample was predominantly breastfed and nearly two thirds were predominantly formula-fed at 9 months (Table 2). These percentages did not differ by study group, nor did the percentage of participants meeting or not meeting the CACFP recommendations for each complementary food.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of infants included in LCA analysis

Responsive Parenting
(n=129)
Control
(n=130)
Maternal characteristics
Age (y) 29.1 (4.5) 28.8 (4.8)
Married (%) 76.0 79.2
Income (%)
  <$10,000 3.9 2.3
  $10,000–24,999 6.2 6.9
  $25,000–49,999 3.1 16.9
  $50,000–74,999 34.1 19.2
  $75,000–99,999 24.8 16.9
  ≥$100,000 24.0 31.5
  Don’t know/refuse to answer 3.9 6.2
Education (%)
  High school or less 7.8 10.8
  Some college 26.4 24.6
  College graduate 36.4 39.2
  Post graduate 29.5 25.4
Race (%)
  Black 5.4 4.6
  White 89.2 92.3
  Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.8 0
  Asian 3.1 3.1
  Other 1.6 0
Hispanic (%) 7.0 6.2
Pre-pregnancy BMI 25.6 (5.0) 25.3 (5.7)
Gestational weight gain (kg) 15.4 (6.3) 15.1 (6.0)
Returned to work by 3 mo (%) 53.1 59.9
Infant characteristics
Infant sex (% male) 53.5 49.2
Birth wt for gestational age z-score −0.04 (0.88) 0.08 (0.87)
In childcare at 20w (%) 60.5 66.2

Values are mean (SD) or %.

Table 2.

Item response probabilities for five latent classes of dietary exposure, based on food frequency data at 9 months

Food frequency item Total sample (%) BFVc BLV FFV FLV FHED
Breastmilk (≥80%)ab 33.0 0.96 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00
Formula (≥80%)b 58.9 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.94 0.87
Cow’s milk (>0× per day) 2.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19
Other dairy (≥1× per day) 35.7 0.55 0.20 0.44 0.20 0.57
Infant cereal (≥3× per day) 7.8 0.07 0.00 0.25 0.02 0.12
Starches (≥1× per day) 23.5 0.35 0.08 0.59 0.03 0.38
Vegetables (≥1.5× per day) 76.5 1.00 0.53 0.98 0.57 0.88
Fruit (≥1.5× per day) 72.6 1.00 0.01 0.86 0.63 0.95
Meat (≥1× per day) 12.9 0.22 0.04 0.27 0.01 0.24
Juice (>0× per day) 38.4 0.16 0.32 0.01 0.52 0.98
Sweet drinks (>0× per day) 6.3 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.41
Sweet foods (>0× per day) 28.2 0.21 0.04 0.38 0.23 0.74
French fries (>0× per day) 18.0 0.12 0.08 0.28 0.10 0.56
a

The higher frequency category used in the latent class model is listed next to each FFQ item

b

As a percentage of total milk (breast and formula) feedings at 9 months

c

Dietary latent classes: BFV=breastfed, fruits and vegetables, BLV=breastfed, low variety, FFV=formula, fruits and vegetables, FLV=formula, low variety, FHED=formula, high energy density

Latent class analysis of infant dietary patterns

A model with 5 classes was selected to describe infant dietary patterns at 9 months based on a combination of AIC (952 for one class, 703 for two, 646 for three, 608 for four, 594 for five, 593 for six, and 602 for seven), BIC (998 for one class, 799 for two, 792 for three, 804 for four, 840 for five, 888 for six, and 947 for seven), BLRT (1 vs 2, 2 vs 3, 3 vs 4, 4 vs 5 classes, all p<0.05; 5 vs 6 classes p>0.05), and an inspection of the parameters. The five class model identified classes that were similar to those identified by Rose et al. (8) in the patterns of items endorsed. The average posterior probabilities for the five classes ranged from 0.85–0.99.

Table 2 shows the item response probabilities of endorsing each food group for each of the 5 latent classes. Item response probabilities closer to 1 indicate that infants in that latent class are more likely to consume the item, while probabilities closer to 0 indicate that they are less likely to consume the item. The five classes were labelled based on the combination of milk feeding and solid foods endorsed at 9 months. The first class, “Breastfeeding, Fruits and Vegetables (BFV)” (24.0% of all participants), was characterized by a high probability of being predominantly breastfed at 9 months, a high probability of consuming fruits and vegetables (FV), and a low probability of consuming fruit juice and high energy density (ED) foods like sweet drinks, sweet foods, and French fries. The second class, “Breastfeeding, Low Variety (BLV)” (10.0% of participants), also had a high probability of being predominantly breastfed at 9 months, but a lower probability of consuming FV and other age-appropriate complementary foods than the BFV class. The third class, “Formula, Fruits and Vegetables (FFV)” (15.5% of participants), had a high probability of being predominantly formula-fed at 9 months, and consuming FV, and a low probability of consuming fruit juice and sweet drinks. The fourth and largest class, “Formula, Low Variety (FLV)” (40.2% of participants), also had a high probability of being predominantly formula-fed at 9 months, but had a lower probability of consuming age-appropriate complementary foods and a higher probability of consuming fruit juice than the FFV class. The fifth class, “Formula, High Energy Density (FHED)” (10.3% of participants), was characterized by a high probability of being formula-fed at 9 months and consuming FV, but also a higher probability than the other classes of consuming fruit juice, sweet drinks, sweet foods, and French fries.

Effects of covariates on latent class membership

Effects of covariates (maternal age, income, marital status, education, pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain, employment, childcare, infant sex, and birth weight) on class membership probability are shown in Table 3, and for ease of interpretability, differences in means or percentages by class are show in Table 4. There were no significant interactions between study group and any of the covariates investigated, so the analyses presented include only main effects. Odds ratios were calculated using BFV as a reference for all other classes, as this pattern is most consistent with current infant feeding guidance. Mothers who were who were older, higher income, married, and more highly educated were less likely to classified as FLV and FHED, while mothers with a higher pre-pregnancy BMI were more likely to belong to these classes. Mothers who had returned to work by 3 months were more likely to belong to the FLV class. There were no significant effects of gestational weight gain, infant sex, infant birthweight-for-gestational age z-score, or use of childcare at 20 weeks on class membership probability.

Table 3.

Independent effects of covariates on latent class membership probability

Covariate p BFVa BLV FFV FLV FHED
Maternal characteristics
Age (y) 0.001 1 0.97
(0.90–1.04)
0.99
(0.93–1.05)
0.93
(0.88–0.97)
0.83
(0.77–0.90)
Incomeb 0.007 1 0.88
(0.61–1.27)
0.87
(0.59–1.21)
0.75
(0.58–0.97)
0.52
(0.36–0.75)
Marital status (y/n) <0.0001 1 0.46
(0.11–1.86)
1.43
(0.24–8.49)
0.19
(0.07–0.54)
0.07
(0.02–0.25)
Educationc <0.0001 1 0.94
(0.54–1.63)
1.17
(0.70–1.97)
0.45
(0.30–0.68)
0.41
(0.23–0.73)
Pre-pregnancy BMI 0.02 1 0.95
(0.88–1.03)
0.99
(0.93–1.06)
1.05
(1.00–1.10)
1.09
(1.02–1.15)
Gestational wt gain (kg) NS 1 1.03
(0.97–1.09)
1.00
(0.95–1.05)
1.03
(0.97–1.09)
1.04
(0.99–1.08)
Returned to work by 3 months (y/n) 0.07 1 0.96
(0.37–2.50)
2.32
(0.93–5.77)
2.27
(1.15–4.49)
1.73
(0.59–5.07)
Infant characteristics
Infant sex NS 1 0.84
(0.33–2.17)
1.04
(0.41–2.63)
1.18
(0.60–2.29)
0.95
(0.33–2.68)
Birth wt for gest age NS 1 0.85
(0.55–1.30)
0.94
(0.64–1.40)
0.98
(0.73–1.30)
1.11
(0.70–1.75)
Childcare (y/n) at 20w NS 1 0.95
(0.37–2.42)
2.39
(0.92–6.18)
1.88
(0.96–3.71)
1.81
(0.59–5.50

Values are OR (95% CI). Bolded values are significant, p<0.05.

a

Dietary latent classes: BFV=breastfed, fruits and vegetables, BLV=breastfed, low variety, FFV=formula, fruits and vegetables, FLV=formula, low variety, FHED=formula, high energy density

b

<$10,000, $10,000–24,999, $25,000–49,999, $50,000–74,999, $75,000–99,999, or ≥$100,000

c

High school or less, some college, college graduate, or post-graduate

Table 4.

Demographic characteristics of 5 dietary latent classes

Variable pa BFVb (n=60) BLV (n=25) FFV (n=46) FLV (n=105) FHED (n=23)
Maternal characteristics
Age (y)c 0.002 30.3A (4.7) 29.5ABC(4.1) 29.8AB (3.7) 28.BC (4.9) 26.4C (4.4)
Income (%) 0.02
  <$10,000 1.7 4.0 2.2 3.8 3.8
  $10,000–24,999 6.7 4.0 0.0 7.6 17.4
  $25,000–49,999 3.3 4.0 8.7 12.4 26.1
  $50,000–74,999 25.0 28.0 37.0 22.9 26.1
  $75,000–99,999 21.7 28.0 10.9 26.7 4.4
  ≥$100,000 40.0 32.0 32.6 20.0 17.4
  Don’t know/refuse to answer 1.7 0.0 8.7 6.7 4.4
Married (%) <0.0001 91.7 84.0 89.1 68.6 52.2
Education <0.0001
  High school or less 5.0 12.0 6.5 10.5 17.4
  Some college 13.3 4.0 15.2 40.0 34.8
  College graduate 46.7 48.0 37.0 32.4 30.4
  Post graduate 35.0 36.0 41.3 17.1 17.4
Pre-pregnancy BMI 0.06 24.7 (4.7) 23.5 (3.1) 25.3 (4.9) 26.0 (5.8) 27.4 (6.8)
Gest. wt gain (kg) NS 14.2 (6.4) 15.6 (4.9) 14.7 (5.8) 15.8 (6.4) 16.0 (6.9)
Returned to work by 3 months (%) 0.08 43.3 44.0 63.0 62.9 59.1
Infant characteristics
Infant sex (% female) NS 48.3 44.0 43.5 52.4 47.8
Birthweight for gestational age z-score NS 0.03 (0.93) −0.09 (0.76) −0.02 (0.82) 0.04 (0.94) 0.10 (0.72)
Childcare at 20w (%) NS 51.7 52.0 68.9 69.9 61.9

Values are mean (SD) or %

a

Significant effect of dietary latent class using ANOVA or Fisher’s exact test

b

Dietary latent classes: BFV=breastfed, fruits and vegetables, BLV=breastfed, low variety, FFV=formula, fruits and vegetables, FLV=formula, low variety, FHED=formula, high energy density

c

Values that do not share a common uppercase superscript letter are significantly different from one another

Effects of RP intervention on latent class membership

When covariates that had significant independent effects on class membership were included together in a single LCA model, maternal age and income were no longer significant and were dropped from the model. In the final model including study group, marital status, education, pre-pregnancy BMI, and return to work by 3 months, there was a significant effect of intervention group on class membership (p=0.04). RP group infants were less likely than control to be in the FLV class (OR=0.40, 95% CI 0.23–0.71) or FHED class (OR=0.28, 95% CI 0.12–0.61) relative to the FFV class. No differences in class membership by intervention group were noted for the BFV and BLV classes. The percentages of each study group in each dietary latent class are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Percentage of participants in the INSIGHT responsive parenting (RP) intervention or control in each dietary class.

Latent class membership and BMI at 2 years

Latent class membership at 9 months predicted BMI percentile (p=0.0003) and z-score (p=0.0004) at 2 years (Table 5). Infants in the BLV class had significantly higher BMIs than infants in the BFV and FFV classes, and infants in the FHED class had significantly greater BMI than infants in the FFV class. A contrast analysis revealed that infants who had either breast or formula-based patterns high in FV and low in high-ED foods (BFV and FFV) had significantly lower BMI percentiles and z-scores than other patterns (p<0.0001).

Table 5.

Dietary latent class at 9 months predicts weight outcomes at 2 years

Variable pa BFVb
(n=65)
BLV
(n=22)
FFV
(n=38)
FLV
(n=85)
FHED
(n=33)
BMI percentile 0.0001 45.5AB
(30.7)
68.5C
(26.5)
35.8A
(25.3)
51.3BC
(28.5)
60.0BC
(26.7)
BMI z-score 0.0006 −0.15AB
(1.10)
0.56C
(0.90)
−0.42A
(0.84)
0.04ABC
(0.94)
0.34BC
(0.87)

Values are mean (SD). Values that do not share a common uppercase superscript letter are significantly different from one another (p<0.05).

a

Significant effect of dietary latent class using ANOVA

b

Dietary latent classes: BFV=breastfed, fruits and vegetables, BLV=breastfed, low variety, FFV=formula, fruits and vegetables, FLV=formula, low variety, FHED=formula, high energy density

Discussion

Among a relatively homogenous, predominantly white and higher income sample, ~60% of 9-month-olds were consuming developmentally inappropriate diets, i.e. low in age-appropriate complementary foods (e.g. fruits, vegetables, meat, cereals, and dairy products other than milk) and/or high in energy-dense foods and fruit juice. However, participation in the INSIGHT RP intervention was associated with more healthful dietary patterns. The significant effect of the RP intervention on dietary class membership was primarily attributable to a higher proportion of RP infants who were in the FFV and correspondingly lower proportions in the FLV and FHE classes relative to control. Infants consuming the most developmentally appropriate dietary patterns – BFV and FFV, both characterized by higher intake of FV and low intake of juice and high-ED foods – had the lowest BMI at 2 years. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that effects of RP on dietary intake may be contributing to the positive effects of the RP intervention on weight (7). Future analyses will examine the mediating effects of feeding and diet, as well as other behavioral targets of the intervention (i.e. sleep, self-regulation), on child weight.

In toddlers and older children, non-responsive feeding practices, such as pressure to eat and restriction, have been linked to low FV intake (18, 19) and higher intake of high-ED foods (20), while responsive parenting practices such as parental modeling and covert control have been associated with greater FV intake (19, 21) and lower intake of high-ED foods (18, 21). Our study adds to this literature by demonstrating that teaching RP may promote more healthful dietary patterns, particularly among formula-fed infants.

In this study, infants with dietary patterns low in developmentally appropriate complementary foods (BLV, FLV) or high in fruit juice and high-ED foods (FHED) had higher BMI at 2 years compared to infants with dietary patterns that were more consistent with infant feeding guidance (BFV and FFV). Consumption of fruit juice (22), sugar-sweetened beverages (23, 24), and other high ED foods (24) in infancy has been associated with increased risk for obesity. Low intake of appropriate complementary foods later in infancy may also be problematic. Limited intake of solids in later infancy may be indicative of excess intake of formula or cow’s milk, which has been associated with greater overall energy intake and greater weight in early childhood (25). Exposure to a variety of flavors and textures during this period is also important for the development of food preferences and eating behaviors (3). Repeated exposure to vegetable flavors has been shown to increase consumption of novel foods (26, 27), and delayed introduction to lumpy textured foods has been associated with reduced FV intake and feeding difficulties later in childhood (28), which could impact obesity risk.

We recruited both breastfeeding and formula-feeding mother-infant dyads to determine whether an RP intervention, previously shown in a pilot intervention to impact weight gain among breastfeeding infants (29), would also be effective for formula-fed infants. Though we have previously reported that the RP intervention was equally effective for breast and formula-fed infants in reducing rapid weight gain (7), the LCA findings indicate that the INSIGHT RP intervention was associated with healthier dietary intake for predominantly formula-fed, but not breastfed infants. One potential explanation for this finding is that approximately two-thirds of infants who were predominantly breastfed at 9 months were also exposed to diets that were high in FV and low in high-ED foods in both the control and RP groups, suggesting that breastfed infants in our study were already at lower risk for poor diet quality compared to formula-fed infants, which is consistent with previous literature (30, 31). In addition, RP messaging on complementary feeding may simply have been more beneficial to parents who predominantly formula-fed their infants. Previous research suggests that formula-fed infants consume fewer FV in infancy (32) and childhood (33, 34), perhaps because breastfed infants are exposed to a variety of flavors in breastmilk, and thereby more rapidly accept novel vegetables during weaning (27). To address this, one component of the RP intervention included guidance on repeated exposure to novel foods, particularly vegetables, which has been shown to increase liking and intake of these foods (27). Although the INSIGHT RP intervention increased the proportion of infants consuming the FFV pattern, a substantial number of RP infants were still consuming diets low in FV (BLV, FLV) or consuming high-ED foods (FHED), suggesting that additional intervention may be needed to promote healthy infant dietary patterns.

Infants of mothers who were unmarried, lower income, lower education, or had higher BMI were more likely to be consuming formula-based diets that were either low in FV or high in energy-dense foods. This finding is consistent with previous literature reporting positive associations between higher infant dietary quality and maternal age (35, 36), education (8, 35, 36, 37), income (37), and marital status (36), and negative associations with maternal BMI (35). These sociodemographic risk factors have also been linked to non-responsive feeding practices (36, 38, 39). Early intervention to promote RP among families with higher sociodemographic risk may improve dietary intake among at-risk infants and help to moderate risk for obesity.

One limitation of this analysis is that the LCA model accounted for breast/formula feeding and dietary intake at 9 months only. We chose to focus on this time point due to the heterogeneity of dietary intake among infants at this age (1), when some infants are transitioning to a more adult-type diet while others are still consuming a limited variety of pureed foods. However, earlier dietary exposures may have also influenced both dietary patterns at 9 months and later weight status at 2 years. While the majority of infants in the breastfed classes at 9 months were predominantly breastfed since birth, prior breastfeeding status was more variable among infants who had formula-based patterns at 9 months. A more robust analysis of infant dietary patterns would account for changes in intake across time; however, our study was not powered for this type of analysis. Additionally, our infant dietary intake data were reported by mothers via FFQ and may thus be subject to error. However, FFQs have been used in this age group in a number of studies (1, 40), and dietary patterns derived from our data were associated with infant weight status, providing some external validity for the dietary patterns identified by LCA. Finally, our sample was relatively demographically homogenous. Although we did observe significant relationships between demographic characteristics and dietary class membership, these differences may have been less pronounced than among a more diverse sample.

In summary, this analysis identified five distinct patterns of dietary exposure in 9-month-old infants. Children of mothers who received a RP intervention were less likely to have formula-based dietary patterns with low intake of appropriate complementary foods or high intake of fruit juice and high ED foods. Furthermore, dietary patterns at 9 months were predictive of BMI at 2 years. These findings suggest that an early RP intervention may promote healthier patterns of dietary intake, at least among formula-fed infants, which may contribute to positive effects of RP on infant growth. However, a substantial number of infants in the RP intervention group had dietary patterns inconsistent with current infant feeding guidance, suggesting that further development of RP interventions to improve dietary intake in infancy is needed.

What is already known about this subject?

  • -

    Dietary exposures in later infancy vary in the type of milk (i.e. breastmilk or formula) and in type and variety of solid foods

  • -

    Dietary patterns in infancy have been shown to track into childhood and impact later weight outcomes

What does your study add?

  • -

    Using a person-centered statistical approach, we identified 5 classes of dietary exposures among 9-month-old infants enrolled in a clinical trial of responsive parenting for obesity prevention

  • -

    Infants randomized to the responsive parenting intervention were less likely to have formula-based dietary patterns low in fruits and vegetables or high in energy-dense foods compared to control infants

  • -

    Infants with dietary patterns characterized by higher intake of fruits and vegetables and low intake of fruit juice and energy dense foods at 9 months had lower BMI at 2 years compared to infants consuming dietary patterns low in appropriate complementary foods and/or high in fruit juice and energy-dense foods at 9 months

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Michele Marini, MS, Stephanie Anzman-Frasca, PhD, Jessica Beiler, MPH, Jennifer Stokes, RN, Patricia Carper, RN, Amy Shelly, LPN, Gabrielle Murray, RN, Heather Stokes, Nicole Verdiglione, Susan Rzucidlo, MSN, RN, Lindsey Hess, MS, Chelsea Rose, PhD, Katherine Balantekin, PhD, RD, and Julia Bleser, MS, for their assistance with this project.

Funding: This research was supported by grant R01DK088244. Additional support was received from the Children’s Miracle Network at Penn State Children’s Hospital. USDA Grant # 2011-67001-30117 supported graduate students. REDCap support was received from The Penn State Clinical & Translational Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University CTSA, NIH/NCATS Grant Number UL1 TR000127.

Footnotes

Disclosures: None.

References

  • 1.Grummer-Strawn LM, Scanlon KS, Fein SB. Infant feeding and feeding transitions during the first year of life. Pediatrics. 2008;122(Suppl 2):S36–42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1315d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siega-Riz AM, Deming DM, Reidy KC, Fox MK, Condon E, Briefel RR. Food consumption patterns of infants and toddlers: where are we now? J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:S38–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Birch LL, Doub AE. Learning to eat: birth to age 2 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99:723S–728S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.069047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lioret S, McNaughton SA, Spence AC, Crawford D, Campbell KJ. Tracking of dietary intakes in early childhood: the Melbourne InFANT Program. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67:275–281. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grimm KA, Kim SA, Yaroch AL, Scanlon KS. Fruit and vegetable intake during infancy and early childhood. Pediatrics. 2014;134(Suppl 1):S63–69. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0646K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Paul IM, Williams JS, Anzman-Frasca S, Beiler JS, Makova KD, Marini ME, et al. The Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) study. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:184. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Savage JS, Birch LL, Marini M, Anzman-Frasca S, Paul IM. Effect of the INSIGHT Responsive Parenting Intervention on Rapid Infant Weight Gain and Overweight Status at Age 1 Year: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rose CM, Savage JS, Birch LL. Patterns of early dietary exposures have implications for maternal and child weight outcomes. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2016;24:430–438. doi: 10.1002/oby.21349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bergman LR, Trost K. The person-oriented versus the variable-oriented approach: Are they complementary, opposites, or exploring different worlds? Merrill Palmer Quart. 2006;52:601–632. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Blum RE, Wei EK, Rockett HR, Langeliers JD, Leppert J, Gardner JD, et al. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire in Native American and Caucasian children 1 to 5 years of age. Matern Child Health J. 1999;3:167–172. doi: 10.1023/a:1022350023163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Child and Adult Care Food Program. Infant Meal Pattern. United States Department of Agriculture; Washington, DC: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.CDC Growth Charts: United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2000 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Barlow SE, Expert C. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 2007;120(Suppl 4):S164–192. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2329C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lanza ST, Collins LM, Lemmon DR, Schafer JL. PROC LCA: A SAS Procedure for Latent Class Analysis. Struct Equ Modeling. 2007;14:671–694. doi: 10.1080/10705510701575602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2007;14:535–569. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bray BC, Lanza ST, Tan X. Eliminating Bias in Classify-Analyze Approaches for Latent Class Analysis. Struct Equ Modeling. 2015;22:1–11. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.935265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gregory JE, Paxton SJ, Brozovic AM. Maternal feeding practices predict fruit and vegetable consumption in young children. Results of a 12-month longitudinal study. Appetite. 2011;57:167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fisher JO, Mitchell DC, Smiciklas-Wright H, Birch LL. Parental influences on young girls’ fruit and vegetable, micronutrient, and fat intakes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:58–64. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90017-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fisher JO, Birch LL. Restricting access to foods and children’s eating. Appetite. 1999;32:405–419. doi: 10.1006/appe.1999.0231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boots SB, Tiggemann M, Corsini N, Mattiske J. Managing young children’s snack food intake. The role of parenting style and feeding strategies. Appetite. 2015;92:94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sonneville KR, Long MW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Kleinman K, Gillman MW, Taveras EM. Juice and water intake in infancy and later beverage intake and adiposity: could juice be a gateway drink? Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015;23:170–176. doi: 10.1002/oby.20927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Davis JN, Koleilat M, Shearrer GE, Whaley SE. Association of infant feeding and dietary intake on obesity prevalence in low-income toddlers. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014;22:1103–1111. doi: 10.1002/oby.20644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jimenez-Cruz A, Bacardi-Gascon M, Pichardo-Osuna A, Mandujano-Trujillo Z, Castillo-Ruiz O. Infant and toddlers’ feeding practices and obesity amongst low-income families in Mexico. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2010;19:316–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hopkins D, Steer CD, Northstone K, Emmett PM. Effects on childhood body habitus of feeding large volumes of cow or formula milk compared with breastfeeding in the latter part of infancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102:1096–1103. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.100529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gerrish CJ, Mennella JA. Flavor variety enhances food acceptance in formula-fed infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73:1080–1085. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.6.1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sullivan SA, Birch LL. Infant dietary experience and acceptance of solid foods. Pediatrics. 1994;93:271–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Coulthard H, Harris G, Emmett P. Delayed introduction of lumpy foods to children during the complementary feeding period affects child’s food acceptance and feeding at 7 years of age. Matern Child Nutr. 2009;5:75–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2008.00153.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Paul IM, Savage JS, Anzman SL, Beiler JS, Marini ME, Stokes JL, et al. Preventing obesity during infancy: a pilot study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;19:353–361. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lande B, Andersen LF, Veierod MB, Baerug A, Johansson L, Trygg KU, et al. Breast-feeding at 12 months of age and dietary habits among breast-fed and non-breast-fed infants. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7:495–503. doi: 10.1079/PHN2003550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nielsen GA, Thomsen BL, Michaelsen KF. Influence of breastfeeding and complementary food on growth between 5 and 10 months. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87:911–917. doi: 10.1080/080352598750031536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Noble S, Emmett P. Differences in weaning practice, food and nutrient intake between breast- and formula-fed 4-month-old infants in England. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2006;19:303–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2006.00708.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Burnier D, Dubois L, Girard M. Exclusive breastfeeding duration and later intake of vegetables in preschool children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011;65:196–202. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.de Lauzon-Guillain B, Jones L, Oliveira A, Moschonis G, Betoko A, Lopes C, et al. The influence of early feeding practices on fruit and vegetable intake among preschool children in 4 European birth cohorts. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:804–812. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.057026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Robinson S, Marriott L, Poole J, Crozier S, Borland S, Lawrence W, et al. Dietary patterns in infancy: the importance of maternal and family influences on feeding practice. Br J Nutr. 2007;98:1029–1037. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507750936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hendricks K, Briefel R, Novak T, Ziegler P. Maternal and child characteristics associated with infant and toddler feeding practices. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:S135–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.09.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wen X, Kong KL, Eiden RD, Sharma NN, Xie C. Sociodemographic differences and infant dietary patterns. Pediatrics. 2014;134:e1387–1398. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Baughcum AE, Powers SW, Johnson SB, Chamberlin LA, Deeks CM, Jain A, et al. Maternal feeding practices and beliefs and their relationships to overweight in early childhood. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2001;22:391–408. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200112000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Barrett KJ, Thompson AL, Bentley ME. The influence of maternal psychosocial characteristics on infant feeding styles. Appetite. 2016;103:396–402. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Marriott LD, Robinson SM, Poole J, Borland SE, Godfrey KM, Law CM, et al. What do babies eat? Evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess the diets of infants aged 6 months. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:751–756. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007001292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES