Skip to main content
. 2016 May 11;7(28):44686–44694. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9301

Table 3. Effect of concurrent chemotherapy regimens on OS and PFS in esophageal cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy.

Model Sample size OS PFS
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Unadjusted 161 vs. 156 0.697 0.528-0.920 0.011 0.784 0.599-1.027 0.077
Propensity score–based models
 Stratified 161 vs. 156 0.677 0.493-0.928 0.016 0.751 0.553-0.945 0.036
 Weighted (IPTW) 161 vs. 156 0.700 0.577-0.851 0.003 0.759 0.628-0.918 0.014
 Matcheda 102 vs.102 0.641 0.464-0.887 0.007 0.663 0.474-0.928 0.016

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting.

a

Adjusted hazard was derived from the Cox proportional hazards marginal structural model.