Highlights
-
•
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) following gastrectomy (TG) should be considered challenging even currently although its procedure and clinical value have been being standardized.
-
•
Short- and long-term outcomes as well as standard reconstruction method following these procedures remain unclear. In order to clarify these issues, we reviewed worldwide English literature and 4 of our own cases of PD for patients with previous TG.
-
•
In cases of PD following TG, previously-made Y-limb should not be used for reconstruction following PD because of probable cause of previously-made Y-limb for ALS.
-
•
Long-term outcomes of PD after TG seemed unsatisfactory notably in cases of pancreatic cancer and thus application of PD for patients with previous TG should be carefully decided until reasonable explanation for this dismal outcome is obtained.
Keywords: Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Total gastrectomy, Afferent loop syndrome
Abstract
Purpose
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) following gastrectomy (TG) should be considered challenging even currently although its procedure and clinical value have been being standardized. Short- and long-term outcomes as well as standard reconstruction method following these procedures remain unclear. In order to clarify these issues, we reviewed worldwide English literature and 4 of our own cases of PD for patients with previous TG.
Methods
Clinicopathological variables of 11 cases of PD for patients with previous TG were evaluated. Seven of these 11 were abstracted from a review of worldwide English literature and 4 of 11 were our own cases.
Results
3 cases was reconstructed using Y-limb made in previous TG and afferent loop syndrome (ALS) was observed in 2 of 3, in these cases whereas no cases of ALS were found in cases reconstructed using newly-made Y-limb. In cases where PD was indicated for cancer, early cancer death, defined as death related to cancer recurrence observed within 2 years after PD, was observed in 6 of 9 cases. Notably in cases of pancreatic cancer recurrent cancer was diagnosed within 1 year after PD in 5 of 7 cases and 4 of these patients died of pancreatic cancer soon after recurrence.
Conclusion
In cases of PD following TG, previously-made Y-limb should not be used for reconstruction following PD because of probable cause of previously-made Y-limb for ALS. Long-term outcomes of PD after TG seemed unsatisfactory notably in cases of pancreatic cancer and thus application of PD for patients with previous TG should be carefully decided until reasonable explanation for this dismal outcome is obtained.
1. Introduction
Recently, there has been increasing the number of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) procedures in patients with previous gastrectomy. This is owed to the improved survival of patients who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer [1], [2]. Although its procedure and clinical value have been being standardized, PD for patients who previously received total gastrectomy (TG) is considered challenging. Short- and long-term outcomes as well as standard reconstruction method following these procedures remain unclear.
In this study, we examined the patient characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes of PD following TG by reviewing our own single-center experience of 4 cases as well as cases previously reported in worldwide English literature.
2. Methods
We conducted a retrospective, descriptive analysis of PD in patients who previously underwent PD for various indications. Among 172 patients who underwent PD at our institute from 2001 to 2015, 4 patients had undergone TG before PD. Literature search revealed only 5 papers describing 7 cases of PD following TG. We reviewed 11 cases to collect the following data: age, sex, indication of TG, reconstruction method following TG, interval between TG and PD, indication of PD, reconstruction type of PD, operative time, bleedings, hospital days, complication, and prognosis. The median follow-up period among all cases was 10.5 months (range, 6–60).
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of the patients undergoing TG
The demographics and operative findings of our 4 patients and additional 7 reviewed are summarized in Table 1. This summary includes 10 men and 1 woman with median age of 58 years (range, 45–68). Indication of TG was gastric cancer in 9 patients, gastric ulcer in 1 patient, and gastric malt lymphoma in 1 patient. Reconstruction method of TG was ‘Roux-en-Y’ in 9 patients, ‘esophagojejyunostomy’ in 1 patient, and ‘jejunal interposition' in 1 patient.
Table 1.
List of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy after total gastrectomy.
| Total gastrectomy |
Pancreaticoduodenectomy |
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Age | Gender | Indication | Anastomosis | Age | Interval (months) | Indication | Reconstruction | Operative time (min) | Blood loss (ml) | Complication | Rec,Y/N | Disease free (months) | Survival (months) | A/D | Ref. |
| 1 | 58 | M | gasrtic cancer | Roux-en-Y | 69 | 132 | pancreatic cancer | Roux-en-Y type | 568 | 1009 | afferent loop syndrome | Y | 3 | 9 | dead | † |
| 2 | 54 | M | gasrtic cancer | Roux-en-Y | 78 | 288 | IPMC | New- Roux-en-Y type | 412 | 725 | none | Y | 9 | 12 | dead | † |
| 3 | 57 | M | gastric malt lymphoma | Roux-en-Y | 65 | 96 | bile duct cancer | New- Roux-en-Y type | 471 | 303 | none | N | 24 | 24 | alive | † |
| 4 | 51 | F | gasrtic cancer | Jejunal Interposition | 81 | 360 | pancreatic cancer | New- Roux-en-Y type | 409 | 513 | none | Y | 3 | 5.5 | dead | † |
| 5 | 65 | M | gasrtic cancer | Roux-en-Y | 69 | 43 | pancreatic cancer | Roux-en-Y type | 509 | N/A | afferent loop syndrome | Y | N/A | N/A | dead | Ref. [4] |
| 6 | 45 | M | gastric ulcer | Roux-en-Y | 46 | 15 | pancreatic gastrinoma | New- Roux-en-Y type | 503 | N/A | none | N | N/A | N/A | alive | Ref. [4] |
| 7 | 61 | M | gasrtic cancer | Roux-en-Ya | 71 | 120 | pancreatic cancer | New- Roux-en-Y type | N/A | N/A | pancreatic fistula | Y | N/A | 20 | dead | Ref. [5] |
| 8 | 64 | M | gasrtic cancer | Roux-en-Y | 68 | 48 | bile duct cancer | Roux-en-Y type | 445 | 1430 | SSI | Y | 15 | 24 | dead | Ref. [6] |
| 9 | 36 | M | gasrtic cancer | esophagojejyunostomy with Braun | 56 | 56 | pancreatic cancer | New- Roux-en-Y type | 672 | 938 | none | Y | 6 | 9 | dead | Ref. [7] |
| 10 | 62 | M | recurrent gastric cancer | Roux-en-Y | 72 | 120 | pancreatic cancer | New- Roux-en-Y type | 450 | 500 | none | N | 6 | 6 | alive | Ref. [8] |
| 11 | 68 | M | gasrtic cancer | Roux-en-Y | 80 | 144 | IPMN | New- Roux-en-Y type | 540 | 1300 | none | N | 6 | 6 | alive | Ref. [8] |
† our own case, N/A: Not avaiable.
total gastrectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and splenectomy.
3.2. Characteristics of the patients undergoing PD following TG
In the 11 patients, median age at PD was 69 years (range, 46–81), and median interval between TG and PD was 120 months (range, 15–360). Indication of PD was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in 6 patients, lower bile duct cancer in 2, intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC) in 1, pancreatic gastorinoma in 1 and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in 1.
Median operative time was 506 min (range, 412–672), with 509 min as median for those using same Y-limb made in previous TG (range, 445–568), and a median of 471 min (range, 409–672) for those with a new reconstructed Y-limb. The overall mean blood loss was 840 ml (range, 303–1430), with mean of 1220 ml loss in the group using same Y-limb (range, 1009–1430), and a mean of 713 ml (range, 303–1300) blood loss in those with newly constructed Y-limb. Three patients (27.3%) required blood transfusions. The median hospital stay of the patients was 30 days (range, 19–71). Four patients (36.4%) had postoperative complications including afferent loop syndrome (ALS) (2, 18.2%), pancreatic fistua (POF) (1, 9.1%), and wound infection (1, 9.1%). POF was grade A and was treated conservatively. Of 2 ALS cases, 1 case was our first case of PD following TG, and was required for reopation [3]. There was no operative mortality (Table 2). Three of 11 (27.3%) cases were reconstructed using Y-limb made in previous TG and ALS was observed in 2 of the 3 (66%) (Fig. 1a). The third patient in this group experienced SSI. Meanwhile, the group with a newly reconstructed Y-limb did not experience ALS (Fig. 1b) and only one patient suffered a postoperative complication in the form of pancreatic fistula.
Table 2.
Operative findings and surgical complications.
| Operative findings and surgical complications | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operative findings | ||
| Operation time (min) | 506 (412–672) | |
| Estimated blood loss (ml) | 832 (303–1430) | |
| Trasfusion (%) | 3 (27.3%) | |
| Length of hospital stay(day) | 30 (19–71) | |
| Surgical comlications | ||
| Clavien-Dindo Grade I | SSI | 1 (9.1%) |
| Clavien-Dindo Grade II | Pancreatic fistula (Grade A) | 1 (9.1%) |
| Afferent loop syndrome | 1 (9.1%) | |
| Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIb | Afferent loop syndrome | 1 (9.1%) |
| Total | 4 (36.4%) | |
Fig. 1.
Reconstruction methods after PD following TG.
a: The previously fashioned Y-limb was utilised for pancreatic and biliary reconstruction during the PD.
b: The afferent loop is staped and removed within the specimen, wheras a new Y-limb utilised for pancreatic and biliary reconstruction.
In cases where PD was indicated for cancer, early cancer death, defined as death related to cancer recurrence observed within 2 years (range, 5.5–24 months) after PD, was observed in 6 of 9 cases. Notably in cases of pancreatic cancer (PDAC/IPMC), recurrent cancer was diagnosed within 1 year (range, 3–9 months) after PD in 4 of 7 cases and 4 of these patients died of pancreatic cancer soon after recurrence (within one year).
Discussion
Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a technically demanding procedure, with a poor prognosis as well as poor survival benefit, ranging from 10 to 20% [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. It becomes particularly challenging in patients with a history of major abdominal surgery such as total gastrectomy. This additional difficulty in such operations is caused by the adhesions and anatomical complexity around the pancreas subsequent to the previous TG procedure. Due to the small number of reported cases who have gone through both these complex procedures, no consensus has been reached regarding the standard procedure for reconstruction following PD for patients with previous TG.
In our review of cases done in our centre and recorded in literature, the technique of Y-limb reconstruction during PD, was found to have an important impact on postoperative morbidity. ALS occured in patients whose the previously fashioned Y-limb was utilised for pancreatic and biliary reconstruction during the PD. In our centre, one case was performed with this technique, where resection of the duodenal part of the afferent loop fashioned in the TG was done, and using the remaining part of this loop for pancreatico- and hepaticojejunostomy (Fig. 2). We applied this procedure to reduce the number of intestinal anastomoses. As a result, however, the jejunal limb used was markedly short, resulting in the development of refractory cholangitis due to ALS [3]. Besides avoiding ALS, the cases where we reconstructed a new Y-limb had less median operative time (471 min) and mean intraoperative blood loss (713 ml) as compared to cases where same Y-limb fashioned in TG was used.
Fig. 2.
Hepaticojejunostomy was performed using same previous afferent loop after total gastrectomy. The afferent loop was only 15–20 cm long.
Similarly, cases from other centres reported ALS occuring in one case out of two (50%) where the jejunal limb made in a previous TG was utilised in the PD. The rest of the cases in our centre and in other centres (n = 8), where a new Y-limb was refashioned during PD, no incidence of ALS was recorded.
Therefore, although number of cases is small, it may be safe to consider the reconstruction of a new jejunal Y-limb during PD in patients with previous TG. This is thought to avoid intestinal kinking and excess tension on the anastomosis, especially when the jejunal limb is short, and in turn avoid postoperative development of ALS.
The long term outcome, on the other hand, seems to be poor for patients who have pathologically proven pancreatic cancer (n = 7). Notably in cases of pancreatic cancer (PDCA/IPMC), recurrent cancer was diagnosed within 1 year after PD in 4 of 7 cases. Those 4 cases died of pancreatic cancer shortly after the diagnosis of recurrence. One out of the other 3 cases died within 2 years. A questionnaire was sent to the authors of the other reported cases to clarify the cause of death, but we did not get a clear answer.
Although this seems comparable to the long term survival of PD patients (10–20% 5 year survival), but it demands further evaluation of larger patients series who underwent similar procedures, in order to evaluate the feasibility of such complex procedure. Meanwhile, the possibility of having an immunological and/or oncological disadvantage by having a previous TG must be investigated.
In conclusion, PD should be attempted in TG patients, but with attention to the refashioning a new Y limb. However, because of the poor prognosis of PD following TG for pancreatic cancer, the indication for PD following TG should be carefully considered while taking the decision.
Authors’ contributions
Satoshi Yokoyama made the conception and design of this case report. Authors other than SA contributed to the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data. SA wrote the draft manuscript, and other authors performed the critical revision of the manuscript. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published. SA has overall responsibility and guarantees the scientific integrity.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Acknowlegement
We would like to thank Shady EIGhazly Harb, Lecturer of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cario University, for reviewing the manuscript.
References
- 1.Sasako M. Gastric cancer eastern experience. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2012;21:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2011.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rausei S., Dionigi G., Sano T., Sasako M., Biondi A., Morgagni P. Updates on surgical management of advanced gastric cancer: new evidence and trends. Insights from the first international course on upper gastrointestinal surgery-varese (Italy), december 2, 2011. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2013;(July (10)) doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3082-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yokoyama S., Sekioka A., Ueno K., Higashide Y., Okishio Y., Kawaguchi N. Pancreaticoduodenectomy following total gastrectomy: a case report and literature review. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20(March (14)):2721–2724. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i10.2721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doi R., Fujimoto K., Imamura M. Effects of preceding gastrectomy on the outcome of pancreatoduodenectomy. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2004;8:575–579. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Noguchi K., Okada K., Kawamura H., Ishizu H., Homma S., Kataoka A. Operative procedure for pancreatoduodenectomy in a patient who had previously undergone total gastrectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and splenectomy. Am. Surg. 2012;78:103–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Oida T., Kano H., Mimatsu K., Kawasaki A., Kuboi Y., Fukino N. Jejunal scarf-covering method in pancreaticojejunostomy after total gastrectomy. Case Rep. Gastroenterol. 2012;6:472–477. doi: 10.1159/000341520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mizuno S., Isaji S., Ohsawa I., Kishiwada M., Hamada T., Usui M. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with resection of the splenic artery and splenectomy for pancreatic double cancers after total gastrectomy: preservation of the pancreatic function via the blood supply from the posterior epiploic artery: report of a case. Surg. Today. 2012;42:482–488. doi: 10.1007/s00595-011-0018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yun S., Choi D. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with a history of total gastrectomy for stomach cancers. Int. Surg. 2014;99:71–76. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00071.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Geer R.J., Brennan M.F. Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Surg. 1993;165:68. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80406-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bakkevold K.E., Arnesjø B., Dahl O., Kambestad B. Adjuvant combination chemotherapy (AMF) following radical resection of carcinoma of the pancreas and papilla of Vater-results of a controlled, prospective, randomised multicentre study. Eur. J. Cancer. 1993;29A:698. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80349-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tsao J.I., Rossi R.L., Lowell J.A. Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Is it an adequate cancer operation? Arch. Surg. 1994;129:405. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420280081010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yeo C.J., Cameron J.L., Lillemoe K.D., Sitzmann J.V., Hruban R.H., Goodman S.N. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann. Surg. 1995;221:721. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199506000-00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Millikan K.W., Deziel D.J., Silverstein J.C., Kanjo T.M., Christein J.D., Doolas A. Prognostic factors associated with resectable adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Am. Surg. 1999;65:618. (?) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Benassai G., Mastrorilli M., Quarto G., Cappiello A., Giani U., Mosella G. Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Chir. Ital. 2000;52:263–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


