Abstract
Background
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is part of several cancer predisposition syndromes; however, indications for genetic counseling/testing are not well-defined. We sought to determine mutation prevalence and characteristics that predict for inherited predisposition to PAC.
Methods
We identified 175 consecutive PAC patients who underwent clinical genetics assessment at Memorial Sloan Kettering between 2011–2014. Clinical data, family history, and germline results were evaluated.
Results
Among 159 PAC patients who pursued genetic testing, 24 pathogenic mutations were identified (15.1%; 95%CI, 9.5%–20.7%), including BRCA2(n=13), BRCA1(n=4), p16(n=2), PALB2(n=1), and Lynch syndrome(n=4). BRCA1/BRCA2 prevalence was 13.7% in Ashkenazi Jewish(AJ) (n=95) and 7.1% in non-AJ(n=56) patients. In AJ patients with strong, weak, or absent family history of BRCA-associated cancers, mutation prevalence was 16.7%, 15.8%, and 7.4%, respectively. Mean age at diagnosis in all mutation carriers was 58.5y(range 45–75y) compared to 64y(range 27–87y) in non-mutation carriers(P=0.02). Although BRCA2 was the most common mutation identified, no patients with early-onset PAC(≤50y) harbored a BRCA2 mutation and the mean age at diagnosis in BRCA2 carriers was equivalent to non-mutation carriers(P=0.34). Mutation prevalence in early-onset patients(n=21) was 28.6%, including BRCA1(n=2), p16(n=2), MSH2(n=1) and MLH1(n=1).
Conclusion
Mutations in BRCA2 account for over 50% of PAC patients with an identified susceptibility syndrome. AJ patients had high BRCA1/BRCA2 prevalence regardless of personal/family history, suggesting that ancestry alone indicates a need for genetic evaluation. With the exception of BRCA2-associated PAC, inherited predisposition to PAC is associated with earlier age at PAC diagnosis suggesting that this subset of patients may also represent a population warranting further evaluation.
Keywords: Pancreatic cancer, Germline, Genetics, Mutations, Hereditary, Ashkenazi Jewish, BRCA, Lynch, p16, PALB2
Introduction
Although the majority of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) cases appear to be sporadic, about 5–10% occur in the presence of a family history of the disease [1, 2]. Pancreatic cancer has been linked to inherited cancer susceptibility syndromes including Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (BRCA1, BRCA2), Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome (p16), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (STK11), Lynch syndrome (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM), Hereditary Pancreatitis (PRSS1, CFTR, CTRC, SPINK1), and PALB2-associated PAC [3–16].
In the last two decades, significant strides have been made in the ability to diagnose and appropriately manage individuals with germline mutations, particularly in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium observed a 3.51-fold relative risk for pancreatic cancer in families with BRCA2 mutations; and BRCA2 mutations were identified in 17% of kindreds in whom ≥3 members were affected with pancreatic cancer [6, 8]. The relative risk of pancreatic cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers is estimated to be 2-fold higher than the general population [4]. Recognizing the association of PAC with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) incorporates a personal or family history of pancreatic cancer in their risk assessment and testing guidelines for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome [17].
Not surprisingly, given the presence of founder mutations (BRCA1*185delAG, BRCA1*5382insC; BRCA2*6174delT), the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) PAC patient population has previously been shown to have a high prevalence of BRCA1/BRCA2 genes mutations. For example, 5.5% of patients with Ashkenazi ancestry (unselected for family history of cancer) with resected PAC harbored one of the three common AJ founder mutations; while in AJ breast-and-pancreas cancer families, 14.2% were found to carry a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation with nearly equal distribution amongst the two genes [18, 19].
With the emergence of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors and the recognition of platinum-sensitivity for the treatment of BRCA-associated malignancies, the potential benefit of identifying BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in patients with pancreatic cancer is becoming evident [20–24]. Moreover, the identification of an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome in a patient with pancreatic cancer may have important implications for the individual’s family members with respect to cancer risk and cancer surveillance and risk-reduction recommendations.
Given cost and overall low yield, genetic testing cannot be extended to all pancreas cancer patients, and therefore, the optimal selection of PAC patients for BRCA1/BRCA2 or other genetic testing remains a significant clinical challenge. In an effort to develop better selection criteria for genetic testing, we determined the prevalence of germline mutations in a consecutive series of pancreas cancer patients seen in the Clinical Genetics Service, assessed personal and familial characteristics predictive of genetic mutations, and determined concordance of current genetic testing guidelines, such as those of the NCCN, with the identification of germline genetic mutations in our patient cohort.
Methods
A review of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Clinical Genetics Service (CGS) clinical database identified all patients with a personal diagnosis of pancreatic cancer who underwent clinical genetic counseling consultation between 1/1/2011 to 12/31/2014. Clinical data (including age at diagnosis, cancer pathology, previous cancer history, genetic tests offered and completed, and genetic test results) were gathered. Information regarding family history of cancer and ancestry was obtained by a genetic counselor with construction of a three-generation pedigree. This retrospective study was approved by the MSKCC Institutional Review Board.
Genetic testing based upon the patient’s personal and family histories was offered to patients in the clinical setting during genetic counseling consultations. Informed consent was obtained for all testing. BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation analysis included targeted mutation analysis for the three common AJ founder mutations (BRCA1*185delAG, BRCA1*5382insC; BRCA2*6174delT), full gene sequencing analysis, and/or large rearrangement analysis. Tumor tissue analyses for Lynch syndrome evaluation included immunohistochemical (IHC) staining analysis for the DNA mismatch repair proteins, microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis, and/or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. Germline evaluation for Lynch syndrome, FAMMM, PALB2, and multi-gene panels were also performed either at our in-house laboratory or a New York State approved commercial laboratory. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test.
Results
Patient Characteristics
One hundred and seventy-five (175) patients (89 females, 98 of AJ ancestry) with 176 pancreatic cancers (one patient had a metachronous primary pancreatic cancer) were seen in the MSKCC CGS between 1/1/2011 and 12/31/2014. The median and mean ages at PAC diagnosis were 64 and 63 years, respectively, with a range of 27 to 87 years. A description of patient characteristics is included in Table 1. In 73.7% of patients, pancreatic cancer was the only cancer diagnosis. In the 46 patients with more then one primary malignancy, the most common cancers to have occurred were breast cancer among women (18%, 16/89) and prostate cancer among men (16.3%, 14/86). Another 9 patients had melanoma and 4 had a urinary tract cancer (bladder and renal). Other primary cancers seen included colorectal cancer, lymphoma, GIST, cervical, thyroid, uterine, a carcinoid tumor in the duodenum, a neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary, and as mentioned before, one patient had two metachronous primary PAC diagnoses.
Table 1.
Patient Characteristic (n=175 patients; 176 diagnoses) | Number of patients (%) |
---|---|
| |
Age at diagnosis (mean, range) | 63 years, 27–87 years |
| |
Gender | |
Male | 86 (49.1%) |
Female | 89 (50.9%) |
| |
Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) ancestry | 98 (56.0%) |
| |
Pathology | |
Adenocarcinoma NOS | 171 (97.7%) |
Acinar | 2 (1.1%) |
Mixed (neuroendocrine, acinar, and ductal/adenocarcinoma features) | 3 (1.7%) |
| |
Personal Cancer History | |
>1 Primary cancer | 46 (26.3%) |
Breast | 16 (9.1%) |
Prostate | 14 (8.0%) |
Melanoma | 9 (5.1%) |
Urinary tract (bladder, renal) | 4 (2.3%) |
Metachronous pancreas cancer | 1 (0.6%) |
Other | 10 (5.7%) |
| |
Family History | |
FDR and/or SDR with breast cancer: | |
0 | 89 (50.9%) |
1 | 57 (32.6) |
2 | 22 (12.6%) |
≥3 | 7 (4.0%) |
FDR and/or SDR with ovarian cancer: | |
0 | 150 (85.7%) |
1 | 24 (13.7%) |
2 | 1 (0.6%) |
≥3 | 0 (0.0%) |
FDR and/or SDR with colorectal cancer: | |
0 | 127 (72.6%) |
1 | 38 (21.7%) |
2 | 3 (1.7%) |
≥3 | 7 (4.0%) |
FDR and/or SDR with pancreatic cancer: | |
0 | 114 (65.1%) |
1 | 50 (28.6%) |
2 | 11 (6.3%) |
≥3 | 0 (0.0%) |
Familial Pancreatic cancer (PC in ≥2 FDRs including proband): | 40 (22.9%) |
FDR = first degree relative; SDR = second degree relative; PC = pancreatic cancer
Family histories were reviewed for the number of first- and second-degree relatives with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and/or colorectal cancer diagnoses (Table 1). The side of the family with the most significant cancer history (based upon number and/or type of cancers present) was selected for inclusion. Breast cancer was the most common cancer seen in close family members, followed by pancreatic, colorectal, and ovarian, respectively. Forty patients (22.9%) met criteria for Familial Pancreatic Cancer, with pancreatic cancer seen in at least one of their first-degree relatives in addition to their own diagnosis.
Based upon personal and family histories of cancer, patients were referred to the CGS for evaluation of multiple inherited cancer predisposition syndromes. Out of the 175 total patients seen, evaluation for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome was considered for 166 patients with 151 patients pursuing testing (Table 2). Based upon a personal or family history of other Lynch syndrome-associated cancers and the availability of cancer tissue for tumor analyses, evaluation for Lynch syndrome was performed in 36 patients. PALB2 germline genetic evaluation was considered in light of a personal and/or family history of pancreatic and breast cancer, with testing completed in 48 patients; and p16 genetic testing was performed in 17 patients.
Table 2.
Syndrome | # of patients who completed evaluation | Mutation prevalence |
---|---|---|
Overall | 159 | 24 (15.1%) |
HBOC (BRCA1, BRCA2) |
151 | 17 (11.3%) 4 BRCA1 mutations; 13 BRCA2 mutations |
Lynch syndrome (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) |
36 | 4 (11.1%) 1 MLH1 mutation; 2 MSH2 mutations; 1 MSH6 mutation |
PALB2 | 48 | 1 (2.1%) |
FAMMM (p16) | 17 | 2 (11.8%) |
HBOC = Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome;
FAMMM = Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma syndrome
Genetic Test Results
Of the 159 PAC patients who pursued any genetic testing, a pathogenic germline mutation was identified in 24 patients (15.1%; 95% CI, 9.5% to 20.7%) (Table 2) and included mutations in BRCA2 (n=13), BRCA1 (n=4), p16 (n=2), PALB2 (n=1) and the DNA mismatch repair genes (n=4), consistent with Lynch syndrome. The mean age at PAC diagnosis in all germline mutation carriers was 58.5 years (range 45–75y) as compared to a mean age of 64 years (range 27–87y) in non-mutation carriers (p value, 0.024). Although BRCA2 was the most common gene to be mutated in the overall cohort, no patients with early-onset PAC (diagnosed at ≤ age 50y) harbored a BRCA2 mutation (Table 3); and the mean age at PAC diagnosis in BRCA2 mutation carriers was 61 years, which was not different from the mean age of onset in non-mutation carriers (p value, 0.34). The prevalence of mutations in patients with early-onset PC was 28.6% and included BRCA1 (n=2), p16 (n=2), one MSH2, and one MLH1 mutation (Table 3). In contrast, in patients with late-onset PAC (diagnosed at ≥ age 70y), the mutation prevalence was only 6.5% (p value, 0.01). Of the 34 patients with familial PAC (first-degree relative also with PAC) who underwent genetic testing, one BRCA1 mutation (non-AJ patient) and one BRCA2 mutation (AJ patient) was identified.
Table 3.
Patient population | N | Number of patients tested | Pathogenic mutation identified | BRCA1 mutation | BRCA2 mutation | Other Gene |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ashkenazi Jewish | 98 | 96 | 15 (15.6%) | 2 | 11 | 2 |
Non-Ashkenazi Jewish | 77 | 63 | 9 (14.3%) | 2 | 2 | 5 |
Early-onset (age ≤50) | 26 | 21 | 6 (28.6%) | 2 | 0 | 4 |
Late-onset (age ≥70) | 51 | 46 | 3 (6.5%) | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Familial Pancreatic | 40 | 34 | 2 (5.9%) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome
A total of 151 PAC patients underwent genetic testing for HBOC (79 full BRCA1/BRCA2 sequencing including 65 with large rearrangement analysis; 72 AJ BRCA founder mutation testing only). A BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation was identified in 17 (11.3%) patients, with the majority being BRCA2 mutations (Table 2). The prevalence of a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation was 13.7% and 7.1% in AJ (n=95) and non-AJ patients (n=56), respectively (Table 4). The mean age at PAC diagnosis for all BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers was 60.5 years (range 45–75 years). Despite the later age at which PAC occurred in the BRCA mutation carriers, a personal history of a prior BRCA-associated tumor was present only in 2 women, both with a prior diagnosis of breast cancer. The two mutation carriers with early-onset PAC were of non-AJ ancestry and harbored BRCA1 mutations.
Table 4.
Patient & Family History | Number of Patients who underwent BRCA testing | BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Prevalence | Gene/Mutation |
---|---|---|---|
Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry | 95 | 13 (13.7%) | 1 BRCA1*185delAG 1 BRCA1*5382insC 11 BRCA2*6174delT |
≥2 FDR or SDR with BRCA-associated cancer* | 30 | 5 (16.7%) | 5 BRCA2*6174delT |
1 FDR or SDR with a BRCA-associated cancer* | 38 | 6 (15.8%) | 1 BRCA1*185delAG 1 BRCA1*5382insC 4 BRCA2*6174delT |
No family history | 27 | 2 (7.4%) | 2 BRCA2*6174delT |
Non-Ashkenazi ancestry | 56 | 4 (7.1%) | 2 BRCA1 2 BRCA2 |
≥2 FDR or SDR with BRCA-associated cancer* | 26 | 2 (7.7%) | 1 BRCA1 1 BRCA2 |
1 FDR or SDR with a BRCA-associated cancer* | 18 | 2 (11.1%) | 1 BRCA1 1 BRCA2 |
No family history | 12 | 0 | N/A |
FDR = first degree relative; SDR = second degree relative
BRCA-associated cancer includes breast, ovarian, pancreas
Within the 56 patients with a very strong family history with ≥2 close relatives (first- or second-degree) with a BRCA-associated cancer (breast, ovarian, pancreas), mutation prevalence was 16.7% among the AJs (n=30) and 7.7% among the non-AJ (n=26) patients (Table 4). In the AJ patients with a weak family history (1 close relative with a BRCA-associated cancer) or isolated PAC only, mutation prevalence was 15.8% and 7.4%, respectively. In the non-AJ PAC patients, mutation prevalence was 11.1% in patients with a weak family history, albeit this dataset was limited by a small sample size. No mutations were identified in isolated non-AJ PAC patients.
Other inherited predisposition syndromes
Thirty-six patients underwent evaluation for Lynch syndrome with four pathogenic germline mutations (1 MLH1, 2 MSH2, 1 MSH6) identified. The families of all of the Lynch syndrome patients met Revised Bethesda guidelines, with two families also meeting the Amsterdam II Criteria. One of the MSH2 gene mutation carriers had a PAC with a mixed pathology with neuroendocrine and acinar features. Notably, in three of the Lynch syndrome patients, the PAC was the sentinel cancer diagnosis and two of the patients were diagnosed under the age of 50 years. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining analysis in two additional PAC patients demonstrated DNA mismatch repair deficiency, with subsequent germline testing being unrevealing (i.e. germline testing negative).
One of 48 individuals who underwent PALB2 gene analysis was identified to have a pathogenic mutation. This patient had adenocarcinoma with squamous differentiation, no personal history of other cancers, and family history was positive only for a second-degree relative with late-onset breast cancer. Genetic testing of the p16 gene was performed in 17 patients and identified two suspected pathogenic mutations. Both patients had early-onset pancreatic adenocarcinomas as well as personal histories of melanoma. Seven patients underwent multi-gene panel testing, including two specifically for hereditary pancreatitis. Upon these multi-gene panel tests, a single pathogenic BRCA2 mutation was found, and a single variant of undetermined clinical significance in each of the following genes was found: BRCA2, PALB2, APC, and CFTR.
Discussion
In one of the largest consecutive series of PAC patients who presented for clinical cancer genetics evaluation from 2011–2014, we identified a pathogenic germline mutation in 15.1%, spanning seven different pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, p16, and PALB2. The most common gene found to be altered was the BRCA2 gene, accounting for 54% of all identified pathogenic mutations. The overall mutation prevalence in our cohort is similar to the mutation prevalence in other selected PAC cohorts with a family history of cancer. In PAC patients with a personal or family history of breast or colorectal cancer, Grant et al. reported a mutation prevalence of 10.7% and 11.1%, respectively [25]. In our study, 85.5% of patients had either a personal history of a second malignancy or at least one FDR/SDR with a history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic or colorectal cancer.
Distinct from prior studies, our population represents one of the largest cohorts of Ashkenazi Jewish PAC patients undergoing clinical genetic testing [25, 26]. Among 96 AJ PAC patients who underwent genetic evaluation, mutation prevalence was 15.6% with all identified mutations representing known AJ founder mutations (one BRCA1*185delAG; one BRCA1*5382insC; eleven BRCA2*6174delT, one MSH2*A636P, one MSH6*3987ins4). Prior studies of AJ PAC populations assessing for just BRCA1/BRCA2 found similar rates of mutations, again with the founder BRCA2*6174delT mutation being the most common [19, 26]. Within AJ PAC patients that specifically underwent BRCA1/BRCA2 testing, 13.7% were mutation positive, with prevalence rates of 16.7%, 15.8%, and 7.4% in patients with strong, weak, or absent family history of a BRCA-associated cancer, respectively. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has acknowledged the association of pancreatic cancer with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations and, over the last few years, has started to incorporate a personal or family history of pancreatic cancer in their risk assessment and testing guidelines for HBOC [17]. Of the PAC patients tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, 51% met the 2013, 73.5% the 2014 and 93.4% the recently published 2015 NCCN guidelines. The 2014 provision includes the recommendations of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in AJ PAC patients who have at least one other family member with a BRCA-associated malignancy, while the 2015 provision expands testing criteria to all AJ PAC patients. These important provisions resulted in an increase from 52.9% to 100% of our BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers meeting current NCCN guidelines, including 5 AJ PAC patients who only had one other family member with a BRCA-associated malignancy and 2 AJ patients with isolated PAC (i.e. no family history of BRCA-associated malignancies). Herein, we provide evidence for the appropriateness of the recently revised NCCN criteria that recognize the relatively high prevalence of founder mutations within PAC patients of Ashkenazi descent. Moreover, these recommendations reflect the BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing criteria currently in use for AJ patients with breast, ovarian or male breast cancer where no additional family history is required to meet testing criteria. Notably, as the mean age at PAC diagnosis in the BRCA1/BRCA2 positive patients was 60.5, with a range of 45–75 years of age, it is important that coverage for HBOC genetic testing for PAC patients be incorporated as part of Medicare coverage going forward.
Interestingly, while in the overall cohort, mutation carrier status was associated with an earlier age at pancreatic cancer diagnosis (58.5 years versus 64 years; p value 0.024), this result was driven by mutations in genes other than BRCA2. In fact, similar to other prior studies [8], the mean age at PC diagnosis in the BRCA2 mutation carriers was not different from the mean age at diagnosis in the overall cohort. In many cancer predisposition syndromes, including HBOC and Lynch syndrome, early-age at diagnosis of a component tumor is a red flag for prompting referral for genetic risk assessment. In prior studies of PAC, age at onset of disease was not significantly associated with mutation carrier status [8, 18, 25]. However, such results may be limited given the rarity and small sample size of early-onset PACs in prior studies and may be biased due to a preponderance of older BRCA2 mutation carriers. In this cohort, nearly 15% of patients had disease diagnosed at ≤ age 50 years, with a mutation identified in 28.6% of such patients who underwent testing. In contrast, mutation prevalence among the PAC patients who were diagnosed at ≥ age 70 was only 6.5%. At the present time, genetic risk assessment for PAC is largely driven by family history, and, as such, all 6 of the early-onset PAC mutation carriers described here also had a previous personal or family cancer history. However, the high prevalence and the heterogeneity of the cancer susceptibility genes implicated in the early-onset PAC patients suggests that this unique subset of patients may derive benefit from genetic risk assessment. On the other hand, although PALB2 germline mutations have been linked to pancreatic cancer susceptibility, our results are in line with prior research demonstrating low PALB2 mutation prevalence in PAC patients and PAC families [26, 27].
Our study limitations include a selection bias in that our PAC cohort reflects patients who were referred and accepted clinical genetic counseling. The majority (90.8%) of those counseled accepted genetic testing. There may be PAC patients who were referred but either declined clinical genetics consultation or who were unable to proceed with genetic counseling given the severity of their disease. Despite the bias and limitation, this study population reflects one of the largest consecutive series of PAC patients to have undergone genetic risk assessment providing a real-world depiction of clinical genetics assessment and testing in the setting of PAC, including the largest AJ PAC ascertainment. As early-onset PAC is not by itself an existing criteria for referral for genetic risk assessment, the majority of our early-onset PAC patients had a previous personal or family history of cancer prompting referral to our service. Nonetheless, the identification of a nearly 30% mutation prevalence among early-onset PAC patients is striking and suggests a low threshold for referral for genetic testing in such patients, especially if personal or family history reveals component tumors of a hereditary cancer syndrome.
With the development of novel therapeutic agents such as PARP-inhibitors for BRCA-associated tumors and the recent remarkable results achieved with immunotherapy with PD-1 blockade in Lynch-like (mismatch-repair deficient) tumors, the identification of a germline genetic susceptibility syndrome in PAC patients is becoming increasingly relevant for treatment considerations[23, 28]. Our findings of a high BRCA-mutation prevalence in AJ PAC patients, including those with a weak or no family history of a BRCA-associated malignancy, support that every AJ PAC patient, regardless of age of onset, be extended genetic testing for the AJ BRCA founder mutations. With the exception of BRCA2-associated PAC, our results also suggest that an inherited predisposition to PAC appears to be associated with an earlier age at PAC diagnosis with an especially high mutation prevalence observed in early-onset PAC patients. While this unique subset of patients clearly warrants further study, as with many other early-onset cancers, genetic cancer risk assessment is reasonable to consider in patients with early-onset PAC. In the future, as genetic testing criteria for PAC expand and become more standardized, identification of at-risk family members will further allow for focused efforts on cancer prevention with initiation of surveillance and risk-reducing measures for associated malignancies, thereby potentially improving outcomes in entire families. Importantly, given the evidence provided here and in prior studies, we urge third-party payers, including Medicare, to recognize and incorporate coverage of genetic counseling and testing for selected PAC patients into their benefits.
Acknowledgments
Funding Sources:
Robert and Kate Niehaus Clinical Cancer Genetics Research Initiative
Kroll Family Trust
Lustgarten Foundation
Andrea J. Will Foundation
ZKS is a Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation Clinical Investigator Award recipient
Grant Support: P30 CA008748
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None
References
- 1.Brand RE, Lynch HT. Hereditary pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a clinical perspective. Medical Clinics of North America. 2000;84(3):665–675. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70249-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Norton I, et al. Frequency of a family history of pancreatic malignancy in patients with pancreatic malignancy. Pancreas. 1998;(17) [Google Scholar]
- 3.van Asperen CJ, et al. Cancer risks in BRCA2 families: estimates for sites other than breast and ovary. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2005;42(9):711–719. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.028829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thompson D, Easton DF, T.B.C.L. Consortium Cancer incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002;94(18):1358–1365. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.18.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brose MS, et al. Cancer risk estimates for BRCA1 mutation carriers identified in a risk evaluation program. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(18):1365–72. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.18.1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Cancer Risks in BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1999;91(15):1310–1316. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.15.1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Iqbal J, et al. The incidence of pancreatic cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(12):2005–2009. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Murphy KM, et al. Evaluation of candidate genes MAP2K4, MADH4, ACVR1B, and BRCA2 in familial pancreatic cancer: deleterious BRCA2 mutations in 17% Cancer Research. 2002;62(13):3789–3793. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goldstein AM, et al. Increased risk of pancreatic cancer in melanoma-prone kindreds with p16INK4 mutations. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(15):970–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199510123331504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Su GH, et al. Germline and somatic mutations of the STK11/LKB1 Peutz-Jeghers gene in pancreatic and biliary cancers. Am J Pathol. 1999;154(6):1835–40. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65440-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kastrinos F, et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer in families with Lynch syndrome. Jama. 2009;302(16):1790–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kempers MJE, et al. High colorectal and low endometrial cancer risk in EPCAM deletion-positive lynch syndrome: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(1):49–55. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70265-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Whitcomb DC, et al. Hereditary pancreatitis is caused by a mutation in the cationic trypsinogen gene. Nat Genet. 1996;14(2):141–5. doi: 10.1038/ng1096-141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.LaRusch J, Whitcomb DC. Genetics of pancreatitis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2011;27(5):467–74. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e328349e2f8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jones S, et al. Exomic sequencing identifies PALB2 as a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene. Science. 2009;324(5924):217. doi: 10.1126/science.1171202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schneider R, et al. German national case collection for familial pancreatic cancer (FaPaCa): ten years experience. Fam Cancer. 2011;10(2):323–30. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9414-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN); Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian Version 2.2015. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ferrone CR, et al. BRCA germline mutations in Jewish patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27(3):433–438. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.5546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stadler ZK, et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish families with breast and pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 2012;118(2):493–499. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fong PC, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;361(2):123–134. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Golan T, et al. Overall survival and clinical characteristics of pancreatic cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(6):1132–1138. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lowery MA, et al. An emerging entity: pancreatic adenocarcinoma associated with a known BRCA mutation: clinical descriptors, treatment implications, and future directions. Oncologist. 2011;16(10):1397–402. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kaufman B, et al. Olaparib monotherapy in patients With advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.O’Reilly EM, et al. Phase IB trial of cisplatin (C), gemcitabine (G), and veliparib (V) in patients with known or potential BRCA or PALB2-mutated pancreas adenocarcinoma (PC) Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2014;32(5s) Abstract 4023. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Grant RC, et al. Prevalence of germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes in patients with pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(3):556–64. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.11.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Holter S, et al. Germline BRCA Mutations in a Large Clinic-Based Cohort of Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schrader KA, et al. Genome sequencing of multiple primary tumors reveals a novel PALB2 variant. J Clin Oncol. 2014 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.0272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Le DT, et al. PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;372(26):2509–2520. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]