Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 29.
Published in final edited form as: Energy Ecol Environ. 2016 Jun 7;1(4):248–266. doi: 10.1007/s40974-016-0026-7

The current state of knowledge on the interaction of Escherichia coli within vegetative filter strips as a sustainable best management practice to reduce fecal pathogen loading into surface waters

Casianes Owino Olilo 1, Anastasia Wairimu Muia 3, Wilkister Nyaora Moturi 1, Japhet Ogalo Onyando 2, Ford Roegner Amber 4
PMCID: PMC5199019  NIHMSID: NIHMS805446  PMID: 28042601

Abstract

Agro-pastoral operations have the potential to threaten public health with loading of diverse pathogens into surface waters through overland flow; increasing awareness of the limitations of fecal indicators has led to development of a number of advancements in detection, source tracking and predictive modeling of public health risk. These tools and techniques are beginning to be integrated into management strategies. The objective of this review was to determine the status of current knowledge and challenges of the fate and transport of Escherichia coli in overland flow and their interaction within vegetative filter strip (VFS) as one of these implemented best management practices and to critically evaluate its use in that setting as an indicator organism. With few studies directly focusing on VFS removal of E. coli from overland flow, we critically evaluated the available data on movement of E. coil from fecal source loading to retention and decay or re-release for potential contamination of water ways and pointed out potential limitations in both pathogen-specific removal and its use as an indicator organisms within overland flow and VFS. Critical areas of focus for future studies to reduce gaps in knowledge were identified, and the integration of newer approaches in source tracking, alternative indicators and the use of non-pathogenic surrogates for field testing of existing VFS models was encouraged. With VFS as a growing field of interest as an economical conservation practice and as an avenue for conservation of resources for small-scale agro-pastoral operations, management strategies to reduce initial fecal load from either applied manure constituents or shedding from free-range animals will continue to test the limits in the applications of models to overland flow and VFS management strategies. Further studies at the microscale in understanding discrepancies between low and high pathogenicity strains of E. coil and between E. coil and other fecal pathogens in the context of VFS will be critical. However, nuanced studies are needed to understand either biological or environmental differences in the fate and transport of the diverse types of fecal pathogens within these settings

Keywords: Pathogenic Escherichia coli, Vegetative filter strip, Microbe fate and transport, Overland flow, Indicator organism, Biofilm, Modeling, Genetic diversity

1 Introduction

This review is intended to review our current understanding of the transport, dynamics and biology of Escherichia coli within VFSs and critically evaluate its use in that setting as an indicator organism. We did so breaking down understanding from source to sink in the context of VFSs and how advances in each of those areas have altered our understanding. Since early 1990s, the literature is vast with information based on the fate and transport of manure-borne pathogenic microorganisms in overland flows and their interaction with vegetated filter strips including E. coil. Manure-borne E. coil and other fecal pathogens present a serious management challenge for large and small feedlot operations, as well as, for management of range-grazing herds of domesticated species (Bicudo and Goyal 2003; Gerber et al. 2010; Hubbard et al. 2004). There is a critical need to balance cost-effective and sustainable management options to allow for continued production along while adequately protecting human health from risk of food and waterborne disease outbreaks (Bicudo and Goyal 2003; Boxall et al. 2009; Casey et al. 2015; Gerber et al. 2010). The implications of these public health risks in surface waters from animal operations have been well established since the mid-1970s (Hubbard et al. 2004; Tian et al. 2002), and various mitigation strategies (including vegetative filter strips) have been implemented since the 1980s to address removal of various runoff contaminants into public waters (Lim et al. 1998). The utility of various mitigation strategies continues to evolve with improved technologies for detection and increased understanding of fate, transport and ecology of microorganisms within these systems; however, the advances in understanding and technology juxtapose with severe global pressures such as food scarcity and global climate change that necessitate effective, economically sustainable and practical measures to reduce manure-borne fecal contamination loading into waterways (Boxall et al. 2009; Chiang et al. 2012).

Despite all the advances, waterways worldwide continue to receive manure-borne pathogens unabated world over (Guber et al. 2006). As manure application to crops can provide a low-cost fertilizer and subsequently indirectly provides energy to human populations facing food scarcity (Stout et al. 2005), integrative systems can provide feed for grazing animals while allowing for remediation of harmful constituents from direct application of manure to croplands in order to protect human health. These integrated systems need to be understood from both an engineering and ecological perspective to ensure sustainability. This balance becomes all the more apparent and critical for smaller operations with limited resources and within a local community that depends directly on local surface waters and relies on the food security and economic growth contingent upon success of these operations (Randolph et al. 2007). Although VFS may prove costly than other best management practices for reducing pathogen loading into nearby waterways when feedlots and crops lie in distinct regions, the dual utilization of perennial native grasses or livestock feed vegetation brings operational costs to a minimum (Asbornsen et al. 2013; Bond 2010; Lovell and Sullivan 2006).

The objectives of this review were as follows: (1) to synthesize several bodies of knowledge to provide current status and challenges on the fate and transport of E. coil in overland flow and their interaction within vegetative filter strips; (2) to integrate this working knowledge with improved understanding of E. coil as a model, indicator, and pathogenic organism in environmental waters; and (3) to identify key areas for future research to improve management of VFS to maximize protection of human health while minimizing both management and monitoring costs, in particular to benefit small-scale farms and local communities.

2 Background

2.1 Limitations of fecal indicators

As enumeration of manure-based pathogens to determine their fate and transport is costly (Pachepsky et al. 2006), it is important to prioritize modeling and understanding of pathogenic organisms. As such, fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) have been mostly utilized in initial investigations on efficacy and mechanisms by which VFSs remove or reduce manure-borne pathogens and prevent loading into valuable waterways (Blaustein et al. 2015a, b; Bond 2010; Doran and Linn 1979; Guber et al. 2007). However, uncertainty around the reliability and consistency of coliforms as prognostic for enumeration and risk of presence of pathogenic bacteria and other fecal-borne health risks (viruses, parasites) are not new (Chao et al. 2004; Guber et al. 2009; Hazen 1988; Rochelle-Newall et al. 2015), and more recent work suggests that the most robust model for monitoring is tiered (Harwood et al. 2005). Additionally, predictive power needs to be delineated for tropical systems, often facing further limited resources that restrict tiered approaches to monitoring (Rochelle-Ne-wall et al. 2015). As such, it is imperative to look for alternative source tracking methods that are effective, rapid, low cost and adequately predictive (Dick et al. 2010).

2.2 E. coil as FIB

Escherichia coli has emerged in recent decades as a preferred indicator for fecal contamination in drinking water and surface waters because of the possibility for thermotolerant coliforms to represent non-fecal contamination and the development of faster, affordable, easier, sensitive and specific methods for detection of E. coil with the major limitation identified as it identifies only recent contaminations due to its lack of environmental stability (Odonkor and Ampofo 2013). With respect to transport dynamics within overland flow, subsurface flow and mechanical filtration, E. coil likely provides a reasonable representation for bacterial fecal pollution (Blaustein et al. 2015a, 2016; Martinez et al. 2014; Sinclair et al. 2009). Bacteria sizes range from 0.05 to 10.0 μm, with different shapes such as coccus (spherical or egg-shaped), oval, straight or curved rods (cylindrical shape), spiral, spiral helix or filaments or often clumped into colonies (Odonkor and Ampofo 2013), and with densities close to that of water ranging from 1.0 to 1.1 g cm−3. The facultative anaerobes Escherichia are gram-negative straight rods with typically rod-shaped cells, about micrometers (μm) long and 0.5 μm in diameter, with a cell volume of 0.6–0.7 μm. E. coil use mixed-acid fermentation in anaerobic conditions, and when combined with their aerobic respiration pathways, they can utilize them a wide variety of redox pairs, making them versatile as an indicator organisms. In general, the species grows optimally at 37 °C; however, pathogenic strains demonstrate delayed growth patterns, growing on MacConkey agar plates at 44.5 °C (Odonkor and Ampofo 2013). E. coil grows optimally at 37, and the 44.5 °C incubation step is used as a selective process as E. coil can still grow at that temperature, but many environmental bacterial strains cannot. The diversity of E. coil strains, origins and pathogenicity necessitates continued evaluation of the context in which E. coil is utilized as an indicator organism versus a de facto pathogenic organism of its own right.

2.3 Diversity of fecal pathogens and sources contaminating surface waters

Fecal loading can pose a wide array of pathogens of concern to human health, including bacteria, protozoa, viruses and helminthes (Gerba and Smith 2004; Savichtcheva and Okabe 2006; Tran et al. 2015). The main sources of contamination include animal feedlots, impervious surfaces, and overland flow from agricultural land, failing septic systems, birds/wildlife, domestic pets and raw sewage (Pachepsky et al. 2006). Source tracking methods have emerged as one means by which to determine key contributors to surface waters in order to refine monitoring and evaluate potential interventions (Dick et al. 2010; Savichtcheva and Okabe 2006; Tran et al. 2015). Indeed, though fecal indicators may provide a warning for potential risk in surface waters, the diverse potential sources, physical properties, environmental hardiness and life cycles of all these pathogens make it difficult to find a single adequate indicator (Lalancette et al. 2014). Further, complicating detection and risk assessment is the diversity of pathogenicity of strains of any of these organisms.

Despite some limitations, E. coil continues to advance as a versatile organism for water quality monitoring. Considerable advances for the application of E. coil as an index or model organism have been made in recent years (Odonkor and Ampofo 2013). Both diagnostics specific to disease-causing strains of E. coil (Ahmed et al. 2007; Bonetta et al. 2011; Ram et al. 2011; Shelton et al. 2006) and rapid detection methods for specific bacterial microorganisms have shown good correlation with standardized indicator methods for E. coil and, at times, coliforms that depend upon organism replication, taking minimally 18–24 h (Liu et al. 2009; Noble and Weisberg 2005; Savichtcheva and Okabe 2006; Shih et al. 2015). These newer diagnostics hold promise in that results are delivered within hours. Both environmental detection data and outbreak incidents with protozoa and viruses have indicated traditional coliforms and FIB may not be adequate predictors for presence of these organisms (Karanis et al. 2007; Lalancette et al. 2014; Savichtcheva and Okabe 2006). Thus, application of these indicators in any new environment or evaluation of an intervention strategy in environmental management must be critically evaluated.

2.4 Role of VGFs in contaminant removal

VGFs have emerged as a low-cost, remarkably effective BMP in the abatement of the loading of agricultural contaminants from overland flow to transport into surface waters (Hickey and Doran 2004; Zhang et al. 2010). Understanding of mechanism of removal with respect to the sediment trapping (Liu et al. 2008) of nutrients (Mayer et al. 2007; Roberts et al. 2012), land-applied herbicides, fertilizers (Liu et al. 2008; Sabbagh et al. 2009) or other toxicants (Allaire et al. 2015), and finally animal- or human-derived fecal pathogens (Table 1) (Tyrrel and Quinton 2003) continues to evolve as the implementation and subsequently utility of the BMP advances. Removal can result from physical infiltration, deposition and sorption of compounds (Fig. 1) (Allaire et al. 2015), as well as direct uptake by vegetation and microbial degradation of compounds or pathogens through biofilm formation. While the VGFs slow the speed of overland flows, the efficacy can vary significantly and is less well described for underground movement. Slope (Kouznetsov et al. 2007), surface area, width, soil (Rahmana et al. 2014), rainfall (Blaustein et al. 2016), topography and hydrology can all influence the variability. Recent work has emphasized the role of preferential flow, particularly during saturation, heavy rainfall and formation of surface gullies and eddies phenomena and in particular for the environmental fate of hydrophilic compounds (Allaire et al. 2015) and colloids or colloidal bound contaminants or microorganisms (Mohanty et al. 2016).

Table 1.

Some seminal pollutant removal efficiency for vegetated filter strips

Filter type Microorganism source Slope (%) Plot length (m) Soil type Pollutant Removal efficiency (%) References
Kentucky Blue grass (Poa pratensis L.) Friesian lactating dairy manure (Bos taurus) 2, 4 2.7 Silt loam Fecal coliform 60.9, 69.7 Stout et al. (2005)
Residual dry matter of rye grass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.), wild oats (Avena fatua L.), soft chess (Bromus horcteaceus, L.), redstem filaree [Erodium cicutarium (L.) L'Her] Cattle manure 5, 20, 35 3 Fine loam Fecal coliform, E. coli 94.8–99.995 Tate et al. (2006)
Pensilvania grasses Bovine manure 20 6 Sandy loam and silt loam E. coli Above 90 Pachepsky et al. (2006)
Annual grasses e.g., forbs, perennial grasses of California coastal rangelands Dairy cattle manure 2, 13, 15, 30 5.6–61 Silt loam Fecal coliform bacteria 75, 24–80, 75–99 Lewis et al. (2010)
Fescue grass Feedlot 2 30, 150 Silt loam Fecal coliform, E. coli, fecal streptococci bacteria 100, 79.1–100, 69.2–99.8 Douglas-Mankin (2011)
Fescue grass Swine manure, bovine manure 5 6.5 Loamy, clay loam, loam Escherichia coli, Salmonella 5–30 Cardoso et al. (2012)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Conceptual model of E. coil sources, transformations and transport processes in an agro-pastoral land-use system

Three distinctive layers act in contaminant filtration and removal: surface vegetation, root zone and subsoil horizon (Stocker et al. 2015; Olilo et al. 2016). Overland flow occurs when inflow rate exceeds the infiltration VFS's infiltration capacity due to saturation and soil hydraulics (soil type and infiltration capacity, plot width and slope, topography, microclimate, and vegetation characteristics). Once the overland flow infiltrates into subsoil, it becomes lateral subsurface flow or interflow return capillary flow. Steep slope and microtopography can increase overland flow velocity, transport capacity and uniformity, thus reducing overall removal capacity. Since VFS can directly influence both these parameters through alterations in land use and topography, strategic implementation of VFS can influence the fate and pathway of dissolved nutrients, chemicals, and fecal pathogens through direct mediation of infiltration capacity and interflow in the vadose zone (root zone of VFS plants) and subsoil. Furthermore, the width of VFSs regulates the strip's removal capacity by influencing contaminant lag time during adsorption and degradation processes in the vadose and subsoil zones.

3 Pathogen movement in overland flow

3.1 From manure to surface waters: variability in release

In evaluation of VFS as a remediation for overland flow to prevent surface water contamination by fecal pathogens and the role of E. coil as an indicator organism in that process, it is imperative to understand the diverse life cycle and size of manure-borne pathogens, variability of pathogen release from manure and potential variability of pathogen virulence (Blaustein et al. 2015a; Doran and Linn 1979; Gerba and Smith 2004; Noble and Weisberg 2005; Odonkor and Ampofo 2013). In the delineation of predictive models, this integration of microorganism biology with understanding of hydraulics and local agricultural engineering is absolutely critical in the face of climate change, which will test the limits of any applied model (Chiang et al. 2012).

Reports show that farm animals often carry and release E. coil serotype O157:H7 that could cause death in humans at concentrations as low as 50 CFU/100 mL−1 (Dombek et al. 2000). Potentially severe disease-causing E. coil bacteria isolated from manure and/or sewer systems include Enteroaggregative E. coil (EAEC), Diffusely adherent E. coil (DAEC), Enterotoxigenic E. coil (ETEC), Enteroinvasive E. coil (EIEC), Uropathogenic E. coil (UPEC), Meningitis-associated E. coil (MNEC), Enterohaemorrhagic E. coil (EHEC), Extraintestinal pathotypes (EIPEC) and Enteropathogenic E. coil (EPEC) (Kaper et al. 2004; Lewis et al. 2010). Although the provisional guidelines for surface water bodies are 100 colony-forming units (cfu)/100 mL of fecal coliforms (US EPA 1994), for swimming, these limits are often exceeded (for instance, US policy response to this is the introduction of total maximum daily loads, TMDL, policy), which refers to loading from a source (for instance, 126 cfu/100 mL for E. coil). Waters exceeding limits for drinking are considered impaired (0 CFU/100) (Gallagher et al. 2013).

3.2 Microbe transport in overland flow

Given the variability in release, size and durability of fecal pathogens, it becomes critical to determine the extent which E. coil can adequately model transport in overland flow both by understanding its infiltration, deposition and sorption, as well as uptake or degradation (Fig. 1). Once released into overland flow, microorganisms can be partitioned and transported as single cells, attached to manure particles, or attached to soil particles (Muirhead et al. 2006a; Tyrrel and Quinton 2003). Subsequently, pathogenic E. coil and other fecal microorganisms may be trapped in sediment and soil, attached to subsurface solids, detached, or retained in litter, microponds, or soil macro-pores, of variable shape and size (Abu-Ashour et al. 1998). Pore size and shape influence transport and dynamics in overland flow and VFS, while microenvironmental conditions, such as the availability of nutrients and predation, influence longevity (Abu-Ashour et al. 1998). The role of each in microorganism transport can be critically evaluated through studies of variable scale along the transport pathway, including at the soil core, pedon, hill slope or catchment areas (Pachepsky et al. 2006). Data generated from the fine scale help to determine mechanism of transport and survival; the coarse scale studies help compare relative importance of each, while watershed studies help to apply knowledge to the decision making and management (Pachepsky et al. 2006). Further studies at each level are needed to integrate understanding across manure pathogen categories and types and evaluate fecal indicators in the context of various interventions or management decisions.

Interaction of VFS, infiltration into soil matrix, partitioning, biofilm formation, adsorption/detachment, straining and biological die-off/regrowth have to be combined to design and assess manure management strategies in association with projected overland flow regimes and pathogen loads (Blount 2015; Gallagher et al. 2013; Pachepsky et al. 2006; Quero et al. 2015). While initial studies of manure-borne fecal microorganisms pathogens such as E. coil, developed in the 1980s, were typically concerned with pedon and hill slope scales, in recent years, hill slope and watershed scales have led insight into the effects of soil, vegetation, management, and weather on the fate and transport of fecal pathogens (Overcash et al. 1981; Moore et al. 1982, 1983, 1988; Guber et al. 2005a, b, 2006, 2007; Pachepsky et al. 2006; Moreira et al. 2006; Allaire et al. 2015; Rippy 2015). Understanding at both the macro- and microscale can lend insight into how various management strategies can reduce fecal pathogen loading into surface waters and how well fecal indicators function as a predictive means in the implementation of those strategies. Since it is impossible to cover every possible scenario in field studies, it becomes imperative to develop robust predictive models for ground-truthing and field validation.

Despite the identified limitations of E. coil as an indicator organism and existing gaps in knowledge of how broadly findings can be extrapolated across strain, species and organisms, E. coil has been a key player in the critical evaluation of best management practices to reduce fecal loading to surface waters, particularly with respect to manure-borne pathogens in the agricultural setting. A number of recent reviews have improved the understanding of different segments of the fate and transport of fecal pathogenic microbes (Jamieson et al. 2002; Ferguson et al. 2003; Tyrrel and Quinton 2003; Kaper et al. 2004; Oliver et al. 2005, 2006, 2007; Unc and Goss 2003; Duchemin and Hogue 2009; Davies et al. 2009; Rippy 2015) in overland flow, and research has begun to evaluate this in the context of one low-cost management option: the integration of vegetative filter strips.

3.3 Fecal pathogen removal in VFS systems

Size and shape of E. coil influence their transport through VFS, infiltration and leaching into soil structure or texture, porosity or bulk density (Gannon et al. 1991a, b; Tan et al. 1991; Huysman and Verstraete 1993). Soil texture (saturated or unsaturated, water content) such as sand mixed with gravel and time influences these bacterial transport and fate (Bitton and Harvey 1992). In no-till soils, distribution and continuity of macropores notably, preferential flow pathways and initial water content play significant roles in the process (McMurry et al. 1998; Paterson et al. 1992). Leaching rates are higher in no-till than tilled soils (Van Elsa's et al. 1991). VFS enhances filtration of E. coil, adsorption on soil and plant surfaces and absorption by plants. Bermuda grass, for example, traps maximum percentages of E. coil at varying distances including sand (3 m), silt (15 m) and clay (122 m) from the manure application area, respectively (Douglass-Mankin 2011). Tall vegetation is an effective media to reduce E. coil yield by reducing surface overland flow, increasing infiltration, and protecting the soil surface from detachment or deterioration because of direct rainfall impact (Duchemin and Hogue 2009; Martinez et al. 2014). E. coil and other fecal microorganism from point source pollutants (e.g., septic effluents) or non-point source pollution are transported, leached and infiltrated through soils and subsurface flow from a few centimeters on the surface to 830 cm into the soil matrix. Bacteria move faster in soils than protozoan parasites such as Cryptosporidium parvum (Mawdsley et al. 1996). VFS enables overland flow and microorganisms to infiltrate into the soil profile (Fajardo et al. 2001). Filter media drag resistance is the dominant force in retarding the surface overland flow evidenced when using artificial filter strip to develop an equation of flow by employing the momentum balance principle (Kao and Barfield 1978). Sedimentation is insignificant for E. coil (Gannon et al. 1991a). Since the density of E. coil is usually in the range of 1.0–1.1 g/cm−3, nearly that of density of water, sedimentation may not happen for E. coil (Characklis and Marshall 1990). This statement is supported by previous studies on the surface and vertical transport of fecal coliforms (Walker et al. 1990; Edwards et al. 2000). There is a knowledge gap existing on quantitative rates and extent of E. coil and other fecal microorganisms’ leaching at the field or watershed scale. E. coil and other fecal microorganisms sedimentation occurs when the organisms move vertically through the soil profile or by retention as described by Correll and Weller (1989) and Muñoz-Carpena and Parsons (2011) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Transport and fate of overland flow relative to VFS

4 Improving modeling of fate and transport of fecal organisms in overland flow and VFS

4.1 Release of fecal pathogens into overland flow

The plethora of diverse models developed and applied to simulate the release of manure-borne E. coil and other fecal microorganisms is largely based on the exponential release at the plot, pedon, hill slopes and watershed scales. Two prominently used model by government and regional monitoring agencies include Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF, Bicknell et al. 1997) and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT, Sadeghi and Arnold 2002; Vadas et al. 2004; Bradford and Schijven 2002); they were developed and validated using rainfall-induced storm events and natural tracers (organic carbon and chloride ions) for modeling of fate and transport of coliforms and other manure constituents applied to topsoil, (Guber et al. 2006), but have not focused on the transport of specific pathogens present in overland flow from agro-pastoral land-use systems (Tyrrel and Quinton 2003; Jamieson et al. 2004; Paul et al. 2004; Cardoso et al. 2012; Allaire et al. 2015).

This gap in modeling reflects the limited information available on the factors affecting manure dissolution rates, release of the microorganisms in overland and transport state along a vegetated buffer filter strips (Guber et al. 2006, 2007; Keewok et al. 2014). As vegetated filter strips management and implementation evolves, it will be critical to integrate this information to adequately protect public health. Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia duodenalis oocysts from dairy calf manure were analyzed in the overland flow water, and transport is influenced by both organism-specific factors and environmental factors (Bradford and Schijven 2002). Release magnitude and subsequent transport of microorganisms in overland flow is affected by duration of rainfall and age of fecal deposits (Thelin and Gifford 1983). Microbial fate is determined by attenuation by environmental factors such as sunlight radiation, soil pH and soil moisture and die-off following first-order decay (Tian et al. 2002). The surface characteristics and size of microbes will impact the partitioning between settling, release into the water column, and aggregation with particles for transport. Point source contamination, such as sewer discharge, further complicates determination of the quantity of microorganisms from nonpoint source agro-pastoral land-use system. Even in non-managed lands, surface overland flow passes through indigenous grassed vegetation that holds back some microbes through in-rill mobilization and infiltration losses (Fig. 1). Even with respect to E. coil, there are discrepancies within the literature with respect to longevity of microorganisms within Cowpat and nature of release and transport into overland flow, suggesting management decisions must be site specific. While Muirhead et al. (2005, 2006a, b) showed retention of significant amounts of E. coil within cowpat for more than 30 days and noted that eventual release was as single, transportable cells (Muir-head et al. 2005, 2006b), whereas other work has indicated substantial decay in stored manure as a means to reduce fecal loading to overland flow (Meals and Braun 2006) and the association of E. coil and enterococcus with particles in release and overland transport (Soupir et al. 2010).

Very few studies have evaluated this release or transport (including settling velocities, association with particulates) in the context of the presence of native grasses, but the work that has been done has emphasized the importance of hydrologic soil surface conditions (Cardoso et al. 2012; Fox et al. 2011). Further studies integrating microorganism release from cowpat and transport characteristics within the context of native grasses and VFS will not only lend insight into this avenue for management but also assist with understanding influencing factors on nature of release (Olilo et al. 2016).

4.2 The soil matrix

There is more information available as to how various microbial contaminants interact once they enter the soil matrix. In addition, as VFS models were originally designed and tested with impact on sediment, organic matter and nutrients in mind, the impact on these can have a resulting impact on microorganism retention, release and transport, though the interaction varies considerably. Soil structure or texture, porosity or bulk density and bacterial or pathogen size influence transport, infiltration and leaching in soils (Gannon et al. 1991a; Huysman and Verstraete 1993; Jamieson et al. 2004). Soil structure and texture influence the soil macropores and movement of microorganisms in the soil column, thus influencing infiltration and leaching of water. In the water, microorganisms are moving together attached or unattached to soil particles vertically.

In particular, no till soils management (soils that are not ploughed and are left undisturbed) influences distribution and continuity of macropores, and preferential flow pathways in the soil matrix and initial water content (Allaire et al. 2015). Leaching rates are higher in no-till than in tilled soil (Goss and Richards 2008), suggesting a possible another management to critically evaluate in the context of VFSs. It is well established that protozoal pathogens undergo a substantially slower and different route of transport than microbes (Dumetre et al. 2012; Mawdsley et al. 1995), while there are less available data for virus transport and characterization of interactions with the soil matrix (Oliver et al. 2005); however, it is clear traditional indicator organisms in this context will not sufficiently enable transport characterizations of diverse organism types (Oliver et al. 2005) and much further characterization needs to be done, particularly in the context of VFS. From nutrient and microbiology data, it is evident that VFS helps to facilitate in filtration from overland flow into the soil profile (Fajardo et al. 2001).

VFS enhances vegetated filtration of suspended sediment, adsorption on soil and plant surfaces and absorption of soluble pollutants by plants. Pioneering work with Bermuda grass has demonstrated the importance of critical evaluation of sediment trapping in various soils, with the greatest amount of sediment settling within 3 m for sand, 15 for silt and much further for clay (122 m) from the manure application site (Douglass-Mankin 2011). In addition, tall vegetation enhances retention by slowing overland flow rates, facilitating infiltration, and protecting the soil surface from detachment or deterioration from direct rainfall impact (Duchemin and Hogue 2009; Martinez et al. 2014).

Figure 2 illustrates the possible fate of E. coil and other fecal microorganisms released into overland flow, and sedimentation occurs when the organisms move vertically through the soil profile or by retention; while sedimentation is likely insignificant for individual organisms given their size and density (Gannon et al. 1991a), those associated with colloidal particles moving through overland flow and subsequently being retained need to be further investigated in the context of VFS, particularly with regard as to how to best manage VFS to facilitate sedimentation and deposition.

4.3 Role of biofilms

Most pathogens adsorb to particulates more than 16 μm in size that help them move at faster rates in developed overland flow models; (Haydon and Deletic 2006) in contrast, the interactions within agro-pastoral systems have not been well described. In addition to the role of native grasses on release of pathogenic organisms from manure and dispersion into overland flow, more physical–chemical interactions at the microscopic level can be profoundly changed by biofilm formation and other survival strategies of microorganisms. It is imperative to incorporate the growing body of knowledge in the biology of these organisms into predictive models since life strategies can impact survival, fate and even pathogenicity. Future research to enhance existing VFS models must focus on partitioning coefficients between attached and unattached phases of bacteria and other microorganisms to particulates and elucidate factors that influence this partitioning (Jamieson et al. 2002, 2004; Muirhead et al. 2006b).

The biofilm formation by E. coil strains in environmental studies have indicated adaptation to secondary habitats outside their primary hosts including vegetation such as macroalgae and vegetative filter strips (Byappanahalli et al. 2003; Moreira et al. 2006; Quero et al. 2015). Since pathogenic strains of E. coil utilize attaching and effacing histopathology induced through selective expression of virulence genes for Enteropathogenic E. coil (EPEC) and Enterohaemorrhagic E. coil (EHEC) that are expressed during biofilm formation (Kaper 2005; Kaper et al. 2004) and could play a role in biofilm development in removal from overland flow (Kaper et al. 2004; Moreira et al. 2006). Biofilm forming (auto aggregation) pili are responsible for bacterial aggregation during biofilm development. Since virulence traits of EPEC pathotype including biofilm forming pili (BFP) and encoding secreted proteins (EspA, EspB and EspD) are entangled in biofilm development, it will be important to understand how this impacts retention or removal of pathogenic versus nonpathogenic strains of E. coil and the resulting impact partitioning relationship.

Partitioning of E. coil between overland flow and sediment, then between soil micropore solution and solid phases, then between stream bottom and bank sediments has been described in groundwater models to affect the transport and adsorption of microorganism (Pachepsky et al. 2006). Partitioning of fecal bacteria into the attached and unattached phases occurs during initial release from manure, overland flow and subsurface transport, and stream and bed transport is assumed to be linear, but certain kinetic assumptions such as instantaneous equilibrium may not adequately predict discrepancies between the solid–liquid distribution of E. coil or the presence of biofilm formation, which could be enhanced in the presence of VFS, since time of contact, mixing intensity, and access to different parts of micropore space influence kinetics of equilibrium (Kaper et al. 2004; Pachepsky et al. 2006). It will be important to incorporate more nuanced approaches to modeling if we are accurately to predict human health risk.

It will also be important to determine soil characteristics and how those will be altered by the presence of native grasses. Established factors that encourage E. coil attachment to soil particles include soil hydrophobicity, presence of other bacteria, ions and electrostatic interactions (Pachepsky et al. 2006); less data are available for other bacteria, protozoa or viruses. Furthermore, the distribution of Giardia oocysts could be explained by their attachment or straining in disturbed soil columns (Kuczynska et al. 2005). Extensive work has been done in recent years to describe and define surface characteristics of protozoa, such as Giardia and Cryptosporidium, in addition to the development of non-pathogenic surrogates for the purposes of transport studies (Dumetre et al. 2012). These have yet to be applied within agro-pastoral models managed with VFSand can lend insight into pathogen retention and breakthrough, particularly with respect to movement through macropores of undisturbed, no-till soil. Macropores have been identified as critical environment for potential re-release of pathogenic bacteria in overland flow, particularly under heavy rainfall events resulting in resuspension and movement of sediments.(Guber et al. 2006; Pachepsky et al. 2006). The decreased attachment of bacteria to particulate matter in the presence of manure is possibly mediated by competition between bacteria and dissolved organic matter for attachment sites on soil, modification of soil mineral surfaces by soluble manure constituents, or modification of bacterial surfaces by dissolved organic matter (Guber et al. 2005a, 2006), while the interaction of biofilms with bacterial mobility through soil has been documented, with the resulting impact of reduced soil porosity, in turn resulting in more bacterial retention or less transport (Gerba and Smith 2004).

4.4 Microbe survival and die-off

Soil geochemical conditions and availability of substrates predominantly influence the decay or die-off and growth of microorganisms (Kei et al. 2002). Microbial decay in soil has long been recognized to follow three distinct patterns, namely first-order decay, growth followed by first-order decay; and first-order decay with variable die-off rates (Bradford and Segal 2009; Doran and Linn 1979; Oliver et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2004; Zhai et al. 1995) (Table 2). First-order decay equation has largely described decay in stored manure, soil, land-applied manure, streams and groundwater, but some studies have shown that a first-order decay model with a two-stage function better represents the longevity of E. coil inoculated in soils (Mubiru et al. 2000; Zhai et al. 1995).

Table 2.

E. coli die-off and first-order decay rates in freshly excreted dairy cow manure

Description of study Organism Environmental variables Length of study (days) Die-off rate, k (days–1) References
Die-off in freshly excreted dairy cow manure
    Laboratory based E. coli Three moisture contents (30, 55 and 83 %) and three temperatures (4, 27 and 41 °C) Ranged from 35 to 103 0.11 day–1 at 4 °C
0.20 day–1 at 27 °C
0.32 day–1 at 41 °C
Wang et al. (2004)
Dairy manure, inoculated with E. coli O157:H7
    Laboratory based E. coli O157:H7 Variable moisture and temperatures Ranged from 27 to 60 Top layer 0.111 day–1 at 4 °C (75 % RH), 0.046 day–1 at 20 °C (50 % RH) and 0.112 day–1 at 37 °C (30 % RH)
Middle and bottom layer 0.054 day–1 at 4 °C, 0.074 day–1 at 20 °C, and 0.279 day–1 at 37 °C
Himathongkham et al. (1999)
Freshly deposited cattle feces (steers)
    Laboratory based E. coli Incubated at 15 °C, 25 % and 50 % moisture 111 0.054 day–1 (25 % moisture) and 0.058 day–1 (50 % moisture) Oliver et al. (2006)
Milk, heifer and beef cowpats on grazed pastureland
    Field based E. coli and fecal coliform Two seasonal studies, deposition in late April and mid-July 60–120 April deposition: 0.01593 day–1
July deposition: 0.02332 day–1
Mostaghimi et al. (1997)
In-field monitoring of bacterial, cowpats applied to pasturelands
    Laboratory and field based E. coli and enterococci Four seasonal studies, the spring, summer, fall and winter 120 Enterococci (k = 0.0978 day–1), E. coli (k = 0.0995 day–1), (k = 0.0581 day–1 for E. coli and k = 0.0557 day–1 for enterococci) Soupir (2007)

Environmental factors such as solar radiation, soil moisture content, temperature and pH have been incorporated into decays model over time, along with the possibility for re-growth in the field (Oliver et al. 2006; Pachepsky et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2004). Recent work has put these models into practice to critically evaluate management techniques for reducing public health risks in all three decay situations. For example, recent work evaluated first-order decay of generic E. coil, E. coil 0157:H7 surrogates, Salmonella senftenberg, S. typhimurium, and Listeria monocytogenes surrogates, in static manure piles maintained in four different configurations; composting facilitated by use of straw for increased aeration, self-heating capacity and heat retention was found to enhance decay across organisms, thus reducing public health risk when applied to managed lands (Millner et al. 2014). Other work has emphasized nutrient management plans to match the evapotranspiration rate so that little advective transport of fecal indicators (enterococcus, fecal coliforms and total E. coil), occurred below the root zone and that rapid die-off (<1 month) occurred for remaining microorganisms (Bradford and Segal 2009). The batch experiments suggested biotic factors played a larger role in decay in the soil environment. Work now needs to continue to evaluate discrepancies of decay across organisms and in different management scenario, including the utilization of VFS under various configurations and with native grasses with variable root zone penetration and cover.

4.5 E. coil and other fecal microorganisms’ pathogens transport models

The majority of fate and transport models have been developed and tested with indicator organisms rather than pathogenic organisms (Pachepsky et al. 2006). While necessary in development of models due to limitations imposed by cost, need to compare to existing standards, and protection of public health (by unwanted release of pathogenic organisms into the environment), the advent of avirulent pathogens or innocuous surrogates has allowed for the integration of expanding understanding of discrepancies in both the physicochemical properties of the organisms and biology (Sinclair et al. 2012). As our understanding of biological die-off/regrowth, partitioning, infiltration, straining, and adsorption/detachment expands, studies need to be done to validate models across organism types. While convective phenomenon of pathogenic microorganisms has been described to some extent at the plot level, little data exist on differences in mobility of manure-derived pathogens transport at hill slope and watershed scales, particularly in the context of VFS (Collins and Rutherford 2004; Davis et al. 2009). In addition, within VFS removal of sediment, nutrients and indicator microorganisms from overland flow, there is now a need to incorporate newer tools, such as surrogates and source tracking to more accurately predict public health risk (Guber et al. 2006).

As the impacts of global climate change become more apparent to the modeling of agro-pastoral impacts on surface waters (Mango et al. 2011), it is imperative to develop dynamic models that can simulate a wide range of hydrologic conditions. Munoz-Carpena and Parsons (2004, Muñoz-Carpena et al. (1999) first proposed and developed the VFSMOD-W model system. VFSMOD is an event-based model directing incoming hydrograph and sediment graph simulating outflow, sediment trapping and infiltration under field conditions (Sabbagh et al. 2009) and VFS using vegetated filter strip model-windows (VFSMOD_W), a software model for predicting the hyetograph and hydrograph (Fox et al. 2010). The model has largely been piloted with respect to pesticide applications, outside more traditional inputs such as sediment and nutrients loading, but holds much promise to advance knowledge about differences in transport of various pathogenic organisms in overland flow and through VFS.

4.6 Limitations of using E. coil as an indicator organism in overland flows

Enumeration of pathogenic microorganisms including bacteria or protozoa oocysts in natural water is a difficult and expensive exercise compared to other food and waterborne contaminants (Pachepsky et al. 2006). While there are no comprehensive methods (Table 3) or means to detect the broad array of organisms contaminating surface waters in order to protect public health, great strides have been made in recent years in both the development of low-cost, rapid, user-friendly and sensitive technologies and the integration of these technologies for a more robust risk assessment framework (Pandey et al. 2014; Ramirez-Castillo et al. 2015). Enzyme-based methodologies, which simultaneously detect both total coliforms and E. coil, are the standard for microbiological analysis of water (USEPA 2002). These tests base their detection power on enzymatic reactions. While these tests provide a basis and means for comparison between field studies and management techniques, they are subject to several limitations, including lack of specificity in relationship to source and potential environmental differences in efficiency of removal (Pandey et al. 2014; Ramirez-Castillo et al. 2015).

Table 3.

Summary of methods, their description, application and reference for application of method

Test/type of technology Description Application (indicator, source tracking, strain identification) Type (presence/absence, quantification) Turn around time for results (h) References for application of method
1. Partitioning and separation of microorganisms
    i. Filtration The membrane filtration method gives a straightforward count of bacteria in the water medium based on the growth of colonies on the upper part of the membrane filters. When water is passed through membrane filters, it retains the bacteria. After filtration, the membrane is placed on a selective and differential medium, mTEC, incubated at 35 ± 0.5 °C for 2 ± 0.5 h to resuscitate injured or stressed bacteria, and then incubated at 44.5 ± 0.2 °C for 22 ± 2 h. Following incubation, the filter is transferred to a filter pad saturated with urea substrate. After 15 min, yellow, yellow-green or yellow-brown colonies are counted with the aid of a fluorescent lamp and a magnifying lens Indicator Presence/absence 22 ± 2 Francy and Darner (2000), Dawson et al. (1981), Ling et al. (2002)
    ii. Centrifugation The method frequently used to determine partitioning between unattached and particulate attached bacteria is centrifugation. Using centrifugation to separate microbial fractions assumes that microbial sorption was not affected during the process. Centrifugation was also used to determine attachment of E. coli to montmorillonite and kaolinite. Bacteria have been separated between phases by injecting a Nycodenz solution below the suspension and then centrifuging the samples. Differential centrifugation separates E. coli from soil particles while estimating adsorption process Indicator Presence/absence 48 Characklis et al. (2005), Huysman and Verstraete (1993), Muirhead et al. (2005)
    iii. Homogenization This process is for settling microorganism after sampling and separation from other particles Indicator Presence/absence 48 Davies et al. (1995), McDaniel and Capone (1985)
    iv. Sonication Sonication is a dispersion technique or chemical surfactant, which disrupts the attachment of bacteria to surfaces, for example, sonification was used to disperse bacteria present in bottom soil. Those methods are good for dislodging and enumerating bacteria attached to sediments Indicator Presence/Absence 48 Epstein and Rossel (1995), Davies et al. (1995), Yoon and Rosson (1990)
2. Microscopy
    i. Light
        a. Epiflourescent microscopy Microscopic observations of cells in natural environments often exceed the cultured cells by orders of magnitude. Light microscopy has been leading in detection of E. coli and other fecal microorganism pathogens where samples could be fixed with methanol or iodine, stained with Giemsa stain and visualized and photographed in inverted or normal microscope for enumeration in epifluorescence microscopy Strain identification Quantification 1–2 Mukamolova et al. (2003)
        b. Light microscopy without epifluorescence Light microscopy has been leading in detection of E. coli and other fecal microorganism pathogens where samples could be fixed with methanol or iodine, stained with Giemsa stain and visualized and photographed in inverted or normal microscope for enumeration Strain identification Quantification 1–2 Moreira et al. (2006), Mukamolova et al. (2003)
    ii. Electron Electron microscopy has been leading in detection of E. coli and other fecal microorganism pathogens where samples could be fixed with methanol or iodine, stained with Giemsa stain and visualized and photographed in electron microscope for enumeration Strain identification Quantification 1–2 Mukamolova et al. (2003)
3. Radioisotope labeling The state combined in situ radioisotope labeling of sediment bacteria, bacteria dislodging by ultrasonic treatments, and enumeration using fluorescent staining to determine bacteria enumeration in sandy soil, the protocol accounted for between 88 to 98 % of all bacteria present in soil Source tracking Quantification 24–48 Epstein et al. (1997)
4. Enzyme-based technology Enzyme-based methodologies, which simultaneously detect both total coliforms and E. coli, are the standard for microbiological analysis of water. These tests base their detection power on enzymes β-D galactosidase and β-D glucuronidase. Enzyme-based coliform and E. coli methods must include enhancements in order to work effectively in a variety of water matrices, because buffers, salts and micronutrients enhance enzyme expression. These additives are particularly important in tests that permit enumeration, where the enzyme production from a single organism is detected. Another important ingredient in these tests is an antibiotic (i.e., Cefsulodin) added to suppress the activity of non-coliforms while leaving the coliforms unaffected Indicator Presence/absence 18–48 USEPA (2002)
5. Molecular cloning and biotechnology
    i. Recombinant DNA Recombinant DNA techniques such as plasmid purification involves inserting pieces of a foreign DNA into a plasmid such as insulin generation Strain identification Quantification 18–48 Sambrook et al. (1989), Quero et al. (2015)
    ii. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), involving cell digestion, ligation, transformation could be used for the amplification of the DNA particles. It is an existing molecular cloning technique required to separate bacterial cells to magnify the DNA fragments. PCR is an amplification process that requires a DNA template together with a free 3′-OH. The reaction occurs in three sequential steps involving a host start-denaturation at a specified time at a specified temperature, where the DNA is heated to 95 °C to make it single stranded. This is followed by annealing process where the two primers bind the appropriate complementary strand, during cooling to some specified temperature, followed by an addition of Taq DNA polymerase stock solution in a DNA thermal cycler. The third a final step is primer extension at 72 °C, where DNA polymerase extends the primer by its polymerase process. A base pair product is usually observed when amplified with a primer pair and a DNA template. The cycling process usually consists of 35 cycles of denaturation at a specified temperature for some seconds, annealing at some specified temperature for some seconds, and primer extension at a specified temperature for some seconds. A final extension at some temperature for some time followed by soaking at some temperature could conclude the process. The thermal cycle could continue until all the molecules are completely amplified Strain identification Quantification 18–48 Olandi and Lampel (2000), Quero et al. (2015), Sambrook et al. (1989)
    iii. DNA electrophoresis DNA electrophoresis could be the existing molecular cloning techniques required to separate bacterial cells into different molecular weights, because each molecule travels at a different speed depending on its molecular weight Strain identification Quantification 18–48 Sambrook et al. (1989), Quero et al. (2015)
    iv. Western blotting A useful technique in both cell and molecular biology techniques. It is used to identify proteins located from complex protein mixture. These tasks are accomplished through size separation, transferring to a solid system and using primary and secondary antibody to visualize marking target protein Strain identification Semi-quantification 18–48 Sambrook et al. (1989), Quero et al. (2015)

Increasing evidence suggests that E. coil populations can become persistent and ubiquitous resident in soil under optimal environmental conditions, although soils are typically suboptimal environments for enteric organisms (Brennan et al. 2000, 2010). This finding may suggest that tropical zones will face more challenges in using it as an indicator organism. In addition, leached population of E. coil genotypic isolates from soil leachates do not necessarily form a single genetic grouping and there is some direct evidence that E. coil communities can alter considerably in transition from the primary host to the environment (Gordon et al. 2002). These studies support the hypothesis that E. coil populations can become naturalized in soil where conditions are favorable, forming a reservoir of E. coil in the environment (Brennan et al. 2010). The resulting lack of fecal specificity has serious implications for the use of this organism as an indicator of fecal pollution in the environment (Brennan et al. 2010).

5 Conclusions

In summary, critical evaluation of the fate and transport of both low and high pathogenicity E. coil and its predictive power for other manure-borne pathogens in overland flow and VFS is largely absent in the literature. While some preliminary work has been done at the plot level of VFS, these findings need to be extrapolated at the hill slope and watershed scales and existing model assumptions tested for validity. Discrepancies in biofilm attachment to soil particles and plant roots between strains of E. coil and between types of fecal pathogens need to be further teased apart with attention to implementation of VFS to reduce loading from overland flow in agro-pastoral settings. Advances in microbial source tracking will no doubt help identify target areas for fecal loading abatement, and the development of nonpathogenic surrogates should help improve modeling at larger scales. In addition, with the increasing impact of climate change on rainfall, drought and flooding, particularly in tropical zones, will continue to test the limits in the applications of models to overland flow and VFS management strategies. With VFS as a growing field of interest as an economical conservation practice, it will no doubt continue to be vetted with FIB, including E. coil, as a means to compare with, improve upon and complement other management strategies; however, nuanced studies are needed to understand either biological or environmental differences in the fate and transport of the diverse types of fecal pathogens within these settings. As an avenue for conservation of resources for small-scale agro-pastoral operations, these interventions should include management strategies to reduce initial fecal load from either applied manure constituents or shedding from free-range animals.

Acknowledgments

This literature review study was designed by Professor Japheth O Onyando (Chairman, Department of Agricultural Engineering and Technology), Dr Wilkister N Moturi (Chairperson, Department of Environmental Science), Dr Anastasia W Muia (Department of Biological Sciences) of Egerton University (EU) and Dr Amber F. Roegner. We appreciate the Dean Faculty of Agriculture for granting us the permission to work in field 18 of Tatton Agriculture Park (TAP). The Director, Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KMFRI), Dr. Renison Ruwa who granted the study grant under EU-KMFRI Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Study Programme is highly appreciated. Library staffs of KMFRI are appreciated for making available the literature on microbial analysis methods. Fellow scientists at KMFRI, particularly Chris Nyamweya and Zack Ogari are appreciated for their contributions to the manuscript. We appreciate the staff of Agricultural Electronic Library (TAEL) of EU, for accessibility to scientific literature. This research was funded by The Kenya National Commission of Science and Technology, the Science, Technology and Innovation PhD research grant, under Grant Number NCST/ST & I/RCD/4th Call PhD/181.

References

  1. Abu-Ashour J, Joy DM, Lee H, Whiteley HR, Zelins S. Movement of bacteria in unsaturated columns with macro pores. Trans ASAE. 1998;41:1043–1050. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed W, Tucker J, Bettelheim KA, Neller R, Katouli M. Detection of virulence genes in Escherichia coli of an existing metabolic fingerprint database to predict the sources of pathogenic E. coli in surface waters. Water Res. 2007;41:3785–3791. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.12.026. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allaire SE, Sylvain C, Lange SF, Theriault G, Lafrance P. Potential efficiency of riparian vegetated buffer strips in intercepting soluble compounds in the presence of subsurface preferential flows. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0131840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131840. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Asbornsen H, et al. Targeting perennial vegetation in agricultural landscapes for enhancing ecosystem services. Renewable Agric Food Syst. 2013;29:101–125. doi:10.1017/S1742170512000385. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bicknell BR, Imhoff JC, Kittle JL, Jr, Donigan AS, Jr, Johansson RC. Environmental protection agency report no. EPA/600/R-97/080. US Environmental Protection Agency; Athens, GA, USA: 1997. Hydrological simulation program-FORTRAN user's manual for version 11. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bicudo JR, Goyal SM. Pathogens and manure management systems: a review. Environ Technol. 2003;24:115–130. doi: 10.1080/09593330309385542. doi:10.1080/09593330309385542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bitton G, Harvey RW. Transport of pathogens through soils and aquifers. In: Mitchell R, editor. Environmental microbiology. Wiley; New York: 1992. pp. 103–124. [Google Scholar]
  8. Blaustein RA, Pachepsky YA, Hill RL, Shelton DR. Solid manure as a source of fecal indicator microorganisms: release under simulated rainfall. Environ Sci Technol. 2015a;49:7860–7869. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01095. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blaustein RA, Pachepsky YA, Shelton DR, Hill RL. Release and removal of microorganisms from land-deposited animal waste and animal manures: a review of data and models. J Environ Qual. 2015b;44:1338–1354. doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.02.0077. doi:10.2134/jeq2015.02.0077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blaustein RA, Hill RL, Micallef SA, Shelton DR, Pachepsky YA. Rainfall intensity effects on removal of fecal indicator bacteria from solid dairy manure applied over grass-covered soil. Sci Total Environ. 2016;539:583–591. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.108. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Blount ZD. The unexhausted potential of E. coli. Elife. 2015;4:6956. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bond B. Evaluating the cost and performance of vegetative treatment systems on open beef feedlots in the Midwestern United States. Iowa State University; Ames: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bonetta S, Borelli E, Bonetta S, Conio O, Palumbo F, Carraro E. Development of a PCR protocol for the detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. in surface water. Environ Monit Assess. 2011;177:493–503. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1650-x. doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1650-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Boxall AB, et al. Impacts of climate change on indirect human exposure to pathogens and chemicals from agriculture. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:508–514. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800084. doi:10.1289/ehp.0800084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bradford SA, Schijven J. Release of Cryptosporidium and Giardia from dairy calf manure: impact of solution salinity. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36:3916–3923. doi: 10.1021/es025573l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bradford SA, Segal E. Fate of indicator microorganisms under nutrient management plan conditions. J Environ Qual. 2009;38:1728–1738. doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0428. doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brennan FP, O'Flaherty V, Kramers G, Grant J, Richards KG. Long-term persistence and leaching of Escherichia coli in temperate maritime soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;76:1449–1455. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02335-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Brennan FP, Abram F, Chinalia FA, Richards KG, O'Flaherty V. Characterization of environmentally persistent Escherichia coli population leached from an Irish soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(7):2175–2180. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01944-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Byappanahalli MN, Shively DA, Nevers MB, Sadowsky MJ, Whitman RL. Growth and survival of Escherichia coli and enterococci populations in the macro-alga Cladophora (Chlorophyta). FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003;46:203–211. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00214-9. doi:10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00214-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cardoso F, Shelton D, Sadeghi A, Shirmohammadi A, Pachepsky Y, Dulaney W. Effectiveness of vegetated filter strips in retention of Escherichia coli and Salmonella from swine manure slurry. J Environ Manage. 2012;110:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.012. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Casey JA, Kim BF, Larsen J, Price LB, Nachman KE. Industrial food animal production and community health. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015;2:259–271. doi: 10.1007/s40572-015-0061-0. doi:10.1007/s40572-015-0061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chao KK, Chao CC, Chao WL. Evaluation of Colilert-18 for detection of coliforms and Escherichia coli in subtropical freshwater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:1242–1244. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1242-1244.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Characklis WG, Marshall KC. Biofilms. Wiley; New York: 1990. pp. 110–112. [Google Scholar]
  24. Characklis GW, Dilts MJ, Simmons OD, III, Likirdopulos CA, Krometis LAH, Sobsey MD. Microbial partitioning to settle able particles in storm water. Water Res. 2005;39:1773–1782. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chiang LC, Chaubey I, Hong NM, Lin YP, Huang T. Implementation of BMP strategies for adaptation to climate change and land use change in a pasture-dominated watershed. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9:3654–3684. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9103654. doi:10.3390/ijerph9103654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Collins RP, Rutherford K. Modelling bacterial water quality in streams draining pastoral land. Water Res. 2004;38:700–712. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Correll DL, Weller DE. Factors limiting processes in freshwater wetlands: an agricultural primary stream riparian forest. In: Sharitz RR, Gibbons JW, editors. Freshwater wetlands and wildlife. USDOE; Oak Ridge: 1989. pp. 9–23. [Google Scholar]
  28. Davies CM, Long JAH, Donald M, Ashbolt NJ. Survival of faecal microorganisms in marine and freshwater soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61(5):1888–1896. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.5.1888-1896.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Davis A, Hunt W, Traver R, Clar M. Bioretention technology: overview of current practice and future needs. J Environ Eng. 2009;135(3):109–117. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dawson MP, Humphrey BA, Marshall KC. Adhesion: a tactic in the Survival strategy of a marine vibrio during starvation. Curr Microbiol. 1981;6(4):195–199. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dick LK, Stelzer EA, Bertke EE, Fong DL, Stoeckel DM. Relative decay of Bacteroidales microbial source tracking markers and cultivated Escherichia coli in freshwater microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:3255–3262. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02636-09. doi:10.1128/AEM.02636-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dombek PE, Johnson LK, Zimmerley ST, Sadowsky MJ. Use of repetitive DNA sequences and the PCR to differentiate Escherichia coli isolates from human and animal sources. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:2572–2577. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.6.2572-2577.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Doran JW, Linn DM. Bacteriological quality of runoff water from pastureland. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979;37:985–991. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.5.985-991.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Douglas-Mankin KR. Field assessment of bacteria and nutrient removal by vegetated filter strips. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 2011;4(21):1–7. http://www.ijabe.org. [Google Scholar]
  35. Duchemin M, Hogue R. Reduction in agricultural non-point source pollution in the first year following establishment of an integrated grass/tree filter strip system in southern Quebec (Canada). Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2009;131(1–2):85–97. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.005. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dumetre A, Aubert D, Puech PH, Hohweyer J, Azas N, Villena I. Interaction forces drive the environmental transmission of pathogenic protozoa. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:905–912. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06488-11. doi:10.1128/AEM.06488-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Edwards DR, Larson BT, Linn TT. Overland nutrient and faecal coliform content from cattle manure application to fescue fields. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2000;36:711–724. [Google Scholar]
  38. Epstein SS, Rossel J. Enumeration of sandy sediment bacteria: search for optimal protocol. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1995;117(1–3):289–298. [Google Scholar]
  39. Epstein SS, Alexander D, Cosman K, Dompe A, Gallagher S, Jarsobski J, Laning E, Martinez R, Panasik G, Peluso C, Runde R, Timmer E. Enumeration of Sandy sediment bacteria: are the counts quantitative or relative? Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1997;151:11–16. [Google Scholar]
  40. Fajardo JJ, Bauder JW, Cash SD. Managing nitrate and bacteria in overland from livestock contamination areas with vegetated filter strips. J Soil Water Conserv. 2001;56:185–191. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ferguson C, De Roda Husman A, Altavilla N, Deere D, Ashbolt N. Fate and transport of surface water pathogens in watersheds. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2003;33(3):299–361. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fox GA, Muñoz-Carpena R, Sabbagh GJ. Influence of flow concentration on input factor importance and uncertainty in predicting pesticide surface overland reduction by vegetated filter strips. J Hydrol. 2010;384:164–173. [Google Scholar]
  43. Fox GA, Matlock EM, Guzman JA, Sahoo D, Stunkel KB. Escherichia coli load reduction from runoff by vegetative filter strips: a laboratory-scale study. J Environ Qual. 2011;40:980–988. doi: 10.2134/jeq2010.0391. doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Francy DS, Darner RA. Comparison of methods for determining Escherichia coli concentrations in recreational waters. Water Res. 2000;34(10):2770–2778. [Google Scholar]
  45. Gallagher DL, Lago K, Hagedorn C, Dietrich AM. Effects of strain type and water quality on soil-associated Escherichia coli. Intl J Environ Sci Dev. 2013;4:23–31. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gannon JT, Manilal VB, Alexander M. Relationship between cell surfaces properties and transport of bacteria through soil. Appl Microbiol. 1991a;57:190–193. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.1.190-193.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Gannon JT, Mingelgrin U, Alexander M, Wagnet RT. Bacteria transport through homogeneous soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 1991b;23(12):1155–1160. [Google Scholar]
  48. Gerba CP, Smith JE. Sources of pathogenic microorganisms and their fate during land application of wastes. J Environ Qual. 2004;34:42–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gerber PJ, Vellinga TV, Steinfeld H. Issues and options in addressing the environmental consequences of livestock sector's growth. Meat Sci. 2010;84:244–247. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.10.016. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gordon DM, Bauer S, Johnson JR. The genetic structure of Escherichia coli populations in primary and secondary habitats. Microbiology. 2002;148:1513–1522. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-5-1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Goss MJ, Richards C. Development of a risk-based index for source water protection planning, which supports the reduction of pathogens from agricultural activity entering water resources. J Environ Manage. 2008;87:623–632. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Guber AK, Shelton DR, Pachepsky YA. Effect of manure on Escherichia coli attachment to soil. J Environ Qual. 2005a;34(6):2086–2090. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Guber AK, Shelton DR, Pachepsky YA. Transport and retention of manure-borne coliforms in soil. Vadose Zone J. 2005b;4(3):828–837. [Google Scholar]
  54. Guber A, Pachepsky Y, Shelton D, Yu O. Rainfall-induced release of faecal coliforms and other manure constituents: comparison and modelling. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:7531–7539. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01121-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Guber AK, Karns JS, Pachepsky YA, Sadeghi AM, Van Kessel JS, Dao TH. Comparison of release and transport of manure-borne Escherichia coli and enterococci under grass buffer conditions. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2007;44:161–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02065.x. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Guber AK, Yakirevich AM, Sadeghi AM, Pachepsky YA, Shelton DR. Uncertainty evaluation of coliform bacteria removal from vegetated filter strip under overland flow condition. J Environ Qual. 2009;38:1636–1644. doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0328. doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Harwood VJ, Levine AD, Scott TM, Chivukula V, Lukasik J, Farrah SR, Rose JB. Validity of the indicator organism paradigm for pathogen reduction in reclaimed water and public health protection. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:3163–3170. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3163-3170.2005. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.6.3163-3170.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Haydon S, Deletic A. Development of a coupled pathogen-hydrologic catchment model. J Hydrol. 2006;328:467–480. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hazen TC. Fecal coliforms as indicators in tropical waters: a review. Toxic Assess. 1988;3:461–477. [Google Scholar]
  60. Hickey MB, Doran B. A review of efficiency of buffer strips for the maintenance and enhancement of riparian ecosystems. Water Qual Res J Can. 2004;39:311–317. [Google Scholar]
  61. Himathongkham S, Bahari S, Riemann H, Cliver D. Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhimurium in cow manure and cow manure slurry. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;178(2):251–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb08684.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Hubbard RK, Newton GL, Hill GM. Water quality and the grazing animal. J Anim Sci. 2004;82(13-Suppl):255–263. doi: 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE255x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Huysman F, Verstraete W. Water-facilitated transport of bacteria in unsaturated soil columns: influence of inoculation and irrigation methods. Soil Biol Biochem. 1993;25:91–97. [Google Scholar]
  64. Jamieson RC, Gordon RJ, Sharples KE, Stratton GW. Movement and persistence of fecal bacteria in agricultural soils and subsurface drainage water: a review. Can Biosyst Eng. 2002;44:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  65. Jamieson R, Gordon R, Joy DM, Lee H. Assessing microbial pollution of rural surface waters: a review of current watershed scale modeling approaches. Agric Water Manag. 2004;70:1–17. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kao TY, Barfield BJ. Prediction of flow hydraulics for vegetated channels. Trans ASAE. 1978;22:489–494. [Google Scholar]
  67. Kaper JB. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Int J Med Microbiol. 2005;295:355–356. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.06.008. doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:123–140. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro818. doi:10.1038/nrmicro818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Karanis P, Kourenti C, Smith H. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: a worldwide review of outbreaks and lessons learnt. J Water Health. 2007;5:1–38. doi: 10.2166/wh.2006.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Keewok K, et al. Rainfall runoff model parameter estimation and uncertainty evaluation on small plots. Hydrol Process. 2014;28:5220–5235. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kei W, Yee-Chung J, Viraraghavan T. Transport of bacteria in heterogeneous media under leaching conditions. J Environ Eng Sci. 2002;1:383–395. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kouznetsov MY, Roodsari R, Pachepsky YA, Shelton DR, Sadeghi AM, Shirmohammadi A, Starr JL. Modeling manure-borne bromide and fecal coliform transport with runoff and infiltration at a hillslope. J Environ Manage. 2007;84:336–346. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.011. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kuczynska E, Pachepsky Y, Rouhi S, Shelton D. Transport of manure-borne Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts through saturated and saturated soil columns. Int Agrophys. 2005;19:1–17. [Google Scholar]
  74. Lalancette C, et al. Changes in Escherichia coli to Cryptosporidium ratios for various fecal pollution sources and drinking water intakes. Water Res. 2014;55:150–161. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.050. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lewis DJ, Atwill ER, Lennox MS, Pereira MD, Miller WA, Conrad PA, Tate KW. Management of microbial contamination in storm runoff from California coastal dairy pastures. J Environ Qual. 2010;39:1782–1789. doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lim TT, Edwards DR, Workman SR, Larson BT, Dunn L. Vegetated filter strip removal of cattle manure constituents in runoff. Trans ASAE. 1998;41:1375–1381. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ling TY, Achberger EC, Drapcho CM, Bengtson RL. Quantifying adsorption of indicator bacteria in a soil-water system. Trans ASAE. 2002;45(3):669–674. [Google Scholar]
  78. Liu X, Zhang X, Zhang M. Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping: a review and analysis. J Environ Qual. 2008;37:1667–1674. doi: 10.2134/jeq2007.0437. doi:10.2134/jeq2007.0437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu YJ, Zhang CM, Wang XC. Simultaneous detection of enteric bacteria from surface waters by QPCR in comparison with conventional bacterial indicators. Environ Monit Assess. 2009;158:535–544. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0602-1. doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0602-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Lovell ST, Sullivan WC. Environmental benefits of conservation buffers in the United States: evidence, promise, and open questions. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2006;112:249–260. [Google Scholar]
  81. Mango LM, Melesse AM, McClain ME, Gann D, Setegn SG. Land use and climate change impacts on the hydrology of the upper Mara River Basin, Kenya: results of a modeling study to support better resource management. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2011;15:2245–2258. [Google Scholar]
  82. Martinez G, Pachepsky YA, Whelan G, Yakirevich AM, Guber A, Gish TJ. Rainfall-induced fecal indicator organisms transport from manured fields: model sensitivity analysis. Environ Int. 2014;63:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.11.003. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2013.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Mawdsley JL, Bardgett RD, Merry RJ, Pain BF. Pathogens in livestock waste, their potential for movement through soil and environmental pollution. Appl Soil Ecol. 1995;2:1–15. doi: 10.1016/0929-1393(94)00039-A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Mawdsley JL, Brooks AE, Merry RJ. Movement of the protozoan pathogen cryptosporidium parvum through three contrasting soil types. Biol Fertil Soils. 1996;21:30–36. [Google Scholar]
  85. Mayer PM, Reynolds SK, Jr, McCutchen MD, Canfield TJ. Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers. J Environ Qual. 2007;36:1172–1180. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0462. doi:10.2134/jeq2006.0462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. McDaniel JA, Capone DG. A comparison of procedures for the separation of aquatic bacteria from soil for subsequent direct enumeration. J Microbiol Methods. 1985;3(5–6):291–302. [Google Scholar]
  87. McMurry SW, Coyne MS, Perfect E. Faecal coliform transport through intact soil blocks amended with poultry manure. J Environ Qual. 1998;27:86–92. [Google Scholar]
  88. Meals DW, Braun DC. Demonstration of methods to reduce E. coli runoff from dairy manure application sites. J Environ Qual. 2006;35:1088–1100. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0380. doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Millner P, Ingram D, Mulbry W, Arikan OA. Pathogen reduction in minimally managed composting of bovine manure. Waste Manag. 2014;34:1992–1999. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.021. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Mohanty SK, Saiers JE, Ryan JN. Colloid mobilization in a fractured soil: effect of pore-water exchange between preferential flow paths and soil matrix. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:2310–2317. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04767. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Moore JA, Grismer ME, Crane SR, Miner JR, editors. Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 658. Oregon State University; Corvallis, OR: 1982. Evaluating dairy waste management systems’ Influence on fecal coliform concentration on runoff. [Google Scholar]
  92. Moore JA, Grismer ME, Crane SR, Miner JR. Modelling dairy waste management systems influence on coliform concentration in overland. Trans ASAE. 1983;26:1194–1200. [Google Scholar]
  93. Moore JA, Smyth J, Baker S, Miner JR. Special report 817. Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University; Corvallis, OR, USA: 1988. Evaluating coliform concentrations in overland from various animal waste management systems. [Google Scholar]
  94. Moore J, Smyth J, Baker E, Miner J, Moffitt D. Modeling bacteria movement in livestock manure systems. Trans ASAE. 1989;32:1049–1053. [Google Scholar]
  95. Moreira CG, Palmer K, Whiteley M, Sircilli MP, Trabulsi LR, Castro AFP, Sperandico V. Bundle-forming pili and EspA are involved in biofilm formation by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(11):3952–3961. doi: 10.1128/JB.00177-06. doi:10.1128/JB.00177-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Mostaghimi S, Park SW, Cooke RA, Wang SA. Assessment of management alternatives a small agricultural watershed. Water Res. 1997;31:1867–1878. [Google Scholar]
  97. Mubiru DN, Coyne MS, Grove JH. Mortality of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in two soils with different physical and chemical properties. J Environ Qual. 2000;29:1821–1825. [Google Scholar]
  98. Muirhead RW, Collins RP, Bremer PJ. Erosion and subsequent transport state of Escherichia coli from cowpats. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:2875–2879. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.2875-2879.2005. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.6.2875-2879.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Muirhead RW, Collins RP, Bremer PJ. Erosion and subsequent transport state of Escherichia coli from cowpats. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006a;71:2875–2879. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.2875-2879.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Muirhead RW, Collins RP, Bremer PJ. Numbers and transported state of Escherichia coli in runoff direct from fresh cowpats under simulated rainfall. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006b;42:83–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01823.x. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Mukamolova GV, Kaprelyants AS, Kell DB, Young M. Adoption of the transiently non-culturable state—a bacterial survival strategy. Academic Press; San Diego: 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Muñoz-Carpena MR, Parsons JE. A design procedure for vegetated filter strips using VFSMOD-W. Trans ASAE. 2004;47:1933–1941. [Google Scholar]
  103. Muñoz-Carpena MR, Parsons JE. VFSMOD-W, vegetated filter strips modelling system, model documentation & User's Manual Version 6.x. Agricultural & Biological Engineering, University of Florida; 287 Frazier Rogers Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 – 0570: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  104. Muñoz-Carpena R, Parsons JE, Gillian JW. Modeling hydrology and sediment transport in vegetative filter strips. J Hydrol. 1999;214:111–129. [Google Scholar]
  105. Noble RT, Weisberg SB. A review of technologies for rapid detection of bacteria in recreational waters. J Water Health. 2005;3:381–392. doi: 10.2166/wh.2005.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Odonkor ST, Ampofo JK. Escherichia coli as an indicator of bacteriological quality of water. Microbiol Res. 2013;4:5–11. [Google Scholar]
  107. Olandi PA, Lampel KA. Extraction-free, filter-based template preparation for rapid and sensitive PCR detection of pathogen parasitic protozoa. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(6):2271–2277. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.6.2271-2277.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Olilo CO, Onyando JO, Moturi WN, Muia AW, Ombui P, Shivoga WA, Amber FR. Effect of vegetated filter strips on transport and deposition rates of Escherichia coli in overland flow in eastern escarpment of the Mau Forest, Njoro River Watershed, Kenya. Energy Ecol Environ. 2016;1(3):157–182. doi: 10.1007/s40974-016-0006-y. doi:10.1007/s40974-016-0006-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Oliver DM, Clegg CD, Haygarth PM, Heathwaite AL. Assessing the potential for pathogen transfer from grassland soils to surface waters. Adv Agron. 2005;85:125–180. [Google Scholar]
  110. Oliver DM, Haygarth PM, Clegg CD, Heathwaite AL. Differential E. coli die-off patterns associated with agricultural matrices. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:5710–5716. doi: 10.1021/es0603249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Oliver DM, Clegg CD, Heathwaite AL, Haygarth PM. Preferential attachment of Escherichia coli to different particle size fractions of an agricultural grassland soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007;185(1–4):369–375. [Google Scholar]
  112. Overcash MR, Bingham SC, Westerman PW. Predicting overland pollutant reduction in buffer zones adjacent to land treatment sites. Trans ASAE. 1981;24(2):430–435. [Google Scholar]
  113. Pachepsky Y, Sadeghi A, Bradford S, Shelton D, Guber A, Dao T. Transport and fate of manure-borne pathogens: modelling perspective. Agric Water Manag. 2006;86:81–92. [Google Scholar]
  114. Pandey PK, Kass PH, Soupir ML, Biswas S, Singh VP. Contamination of water resources by pathogenic bacteria. AMB Exp. 2014;4:51. doi: 10.1186/s13568-014-0051-x. doi:10.1186/s13568-014-0051-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Paterson E, Kemp JS, Gammack SM, Fitz-Patrick E, Adisl C, Malcom S, Mullins CE, Kilham K. Leaching of genetically modified pseudomonas fluorescents through intact soil microcosms: influence of soil type. Biol Fertil Soils. 1992;15:308–314. [Google Scholar]
  116. Paul S, Haan PK, Matlock MD, Mukhtar S, Pillai SD. Analysis of the HSPF water quality parameter uncertainty in predicting peak in-stream faecal coliform concentrations. Trans ASAE. 2004;47(1):69–78. [Google Scholar]
  117. Quero GM, Fasolato L, Vignaroli C, Luna GM. Understanding the association of Escherichia coli with diverse macroalgae in the lagoon of Venice. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10969. doi: 10.1038/srep10969. doi:10.1038/srep10969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Rahmana A, Rahmana S, Cihacek L. Influence of soil pH in vegetative filter strips for reducing soluble nutrient transport. Environ Technol. 2014;35:1744–1752. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2014.881421. doi:10.1080/09593330.2014.881421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Ram S, Vajpayee P, Dwivedi PD, Shanker R. Culture-free detection and enumeration of STEC in water. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2011;74:551–557. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.01.019. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Ramirez-Castillo FY, Loera-Muro A, Jacques M, Garneau P, Avelar-Gonzalez FJ, Harel J, Guerrero-Barrera AL. Waterborne pathogens: detection methods and challenges. Pathogens. 2015;4:307–334. doi: 10.3390/pathogens4020307. doi:10.3390/pathogens4020307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Randolph TF, et al. Invited review: role of livestock in human nutrition and health for poverty reduction in developing countries. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:2788–2800. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0467. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Rippy M. Meeting the criteria: Linking biofilter design to faecal indicator bacteria removal. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water. 2015 doi:10.1002/wat2.1096. [Google Scholar]
  123. Roberts WM, Stutter MI, Haygarth PM. Phosphorus retention and remobilization in vegetated buffer strips: a review. J Environ Qual. 2012;41:389–399. doi: 10.2134/jeq2010.0543. doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Rochelle-Newall E, Nguyen TM, Le TP, Sengtaheuanghoung O, Ribolzi O. A short review of fecal indicator bacteria in tropical aquatic ecosystems: knowledge gaps and future directions. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:308. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00308. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Sabbagh GJ, Fox GA, Kamanzi A, Roepke B, Tang JZ. Effectiveness of vegetated filter strips in reducing pesticide loading: quantifying pesticide trapping efficiency. J Environ Qual. 2009;38:762–771. doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Sadeghi AM, Arnold JG. A SWAT/microbial sub-model for protecting pathogen loadings in surface and groundwater at watershed and basin scales.. Proceedings of the total maximum daily load (TMDL) environmental regulations, March 11–13, 2002 conference at Fort Worth, Texas USA; ASAE publications 701P0102; 2002. pp. 56–63. [Google Scholar]
  127. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor: 1989. [Google Scholar]
  128. Savichtcheva O, Okabe S. Alternative indicators of fecal pollution: relations with pathogens and conventional indicators, current methodologies for direct pathogen monitoring and future application perspectives. Water Res. 2006;40:2463–2476. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.040. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Shelton DR, et al. Impact of microbial diversity on rapid detection of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in surface waters. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;261:95–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00334.x. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00334.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Shih CM, et al. Paper-based ELISA to rapidly detect Escherichia coli. Talanta. 2015;145:2–5. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.07.051. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2015.07.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Sinclair A, et al. Growing season surface water loading of fecal indicator organisms within a rural watershed. Water Res. 2009;43:1199–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Sinclair RG, Rose JB, Hashsham SA, Gerba CP, Haas CN. Criteria for selection of surrogates used to study the fate and control of pathogens in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:1969–1977. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06582-11. doi:10.1128/AEM.06582-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Soupir ML. Fate and transport of pathogen indicators from pasturelands.. PhD Dissertation, The Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.2007. p. 315. [Google Scholar]
  134. Soupir ML, Mostaghimi S, Dillaha T. Attachment of Escherichia coli and enterococci to particles in runoff. J Environ Qual. 2010;39:1019–1027. doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0296. doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Stocker MD, Pachepsky YA, Hill RL, Shelton DR. Depth-dependent survival of Escherichia coli and enterococci in soil after manure application and simulated rainfall. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:4801–4808. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00705-15. doi:10.1128/AEM.00705-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Stout WL, Pachepsky YA, Shelton DR, Sadeghi AM, Saporito LS, Sharpley AN. Runoff transport of faecal coliforms and phosphorus released from manure in grass buffer conditions. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2005;41:230–234. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01755.x. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01755.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Tan Y, Bond WJ, Rovira AD, Brisbane PG, Griffin DM. Movement through soil of a biological control agent, Pseudomonas fluorescence. Soil Biol Biochem. 1991;23:821–825. [Google Scholar]
  138. Tate KW, Atwill ER, Bartolome JW, Nader G. Significant Escherichia coli attenuation by vegetative buffers on annual grasslands. J Environ Qual. 2006;35:795–805. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0141. doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Thelin R, Gifford GF. Faecal coliform release patterns from faecal material of cattle. J Environ Qual. 1983;12:57–63. [Google Scholar]
  140. Tian YQ, Gong P, Radke JD, Scarborough J. Spatial and temporal modeling of microbial contaminants on grazing farmlands. J Environ Qual. 2002;31:860–869. doi: 10.2134/jeq2002.8600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Tran NH, Gin KY, Ngo HH. Fecal pollution source tracking toolbox for identification, evaluation and characterization of fecal contamination in receiving urban surface waters and groundwater. Sci Total Environ. 2015;538:38–57. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.155. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Tyrrel SF, Quinton JN. Overland flow transport of pathogens from agricultural land receiving faecal wastes. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(Suppl):87S–93S. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.94.s1.10.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Unc A, Goss MJ. Movement of faecal bacteria through the vadose zone. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2003;149:327–337. [Google Scholar]
  144. U.S. EPA . EPA 810 F-94-001A. Office of Water, USEPA; Washington, DC: 1994. National primary drinking water standards. [Google Scholar]
  145. U.S. EPA . Method 1604: Total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water by membrane filtration using a simultaneous detection technique (MI medium), Agency 20460, EPA 821-R-02-024. Office of Water Environmental Protection; Washington, DC: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  146. Vadas PA, Kleinman PJA, Sharpley AN. A simple method to predict dissolved phosphorus in runoff from surface applied manures. J Environ Qual. 2004;33:749–756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Van Elsa's JD, Trevors JT, Van Overbeek LS. Influence of soil properties on the vertical movement of genetically—marked pseudomonas 132 fluorescents through large soil microorganisms. Biol Fertil Soils. 1991;10:249–255. [Google Scholar]
  148. Walker SE, Mostaghimi S, Dillaha TA, Woeste FE. Modeling animal waste management practices: impacts on bacteria levels in overland from agricultural lands. Trans ASAE. 1990;33:807–817. [Google Scholar]
  149. Wang L, Mankin KR, Marchin GL. Survival of faecal bacteria in dairy cow manure. Trans ASAE. 2004;47:1239–1246. [Google Scholar]
  150. Yoon WB, Rosson RA. Improved method of enumeration of attached bacteria for study of fluctuation in the abundance of attached and free-living bacteria in response to diel variation in seawater turbidity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56(3):595–600. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.3.595-600.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Zhai Q, Coyne MS, Barnhisel RI. Mortality rates of faecal bacteria in subsoil amended with poultry manure. Bioresour Technol. 1995;54:165–169. [Google Scholar]
  152. Zhang X, Liu X, Zhang M, Dahlgren RA, Eitzel M. A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution. J Environ Qual. 2010;39:76–84. doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES