Abstract
One dimeric matrine-type alkaloid, ochrocephalamine A (1), was isolated from the poisonous plant Oxytropis ochrocephala Bunge. Its structure was elucidated by spectroscopic data and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The insecticidal and cytotoxic activities of 1 were evaluated.
Keywords: Poisonous plant, Oxytropis ochrocephala Bunge, Oxytropis ochrocephala, Alkaloid, Quinolizidine alkaloid
Graphical Abstract

The plant Oxytropis ochrocephala Bunge is a common poisonous plant found in the western grasslands of China1–2. After ingesting the plant, livestock gradually develop a chronic neurological disease, characterized by a staggering gait and muscular incoordination, giving rise to the vivid name ‘locoweed’ for this poisonous plant3. Previous phytochemical investigations on O. ochrocephala provided quinolizidine and indolizidine alkaloids, as well as flavonoids and saponins4–10.
Quinolizidine alkaloids are important natural products exhibiting a broad array of pharmacological activities, such as antineoplastic, antibacterial, antiviral, and insecticidal properties11. Recently, we reported the synthesis of sophoridine derivatives as potential antitumor agents12. As part of our ongoing research program to identify bioactive constituents, particularly from this alkaloid class, we obtained a new quinolizidine alkaloid, ochrocephalamine A (1), from O. ochrocephala. Herein, we describe the isolation, structural elucidation and bioactivity of this compound.
The whole plant (20.0 kg) of O. ochrocephala was percolated three times with 95% EtOH to give a crude extract (3.0 kg). The extract was concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure, followed by partitioning between CH2Cl2 and 2% HCl. The aqueous phase was then adjusted to pH 11 with 3% NaOH and extracted with CH2Cl2 to give crude alkaloids (100 g). The crude alkaloids were subjected to a silica gel column chromatography eluted with CH2Cl2/MeOH (1:0 to 0:1) to obtain fractions A, B and C. Fraction B was chromatographed on silica gel [CH2Cl2/MeOH (10:1)] and then RP-18 (30% MeOH) columns to yield ochrocephalamine A (1, 20 mg).
Ochrocephalamine A (1)13 was obtained as a light-yellow solid (CH2Cl2), and its molecular formula was established as C30H42N4O2 by HR-EI-MS (m/z 490.3296 [M]+, calcd 490.3308), requiring 12 degrees of unsaturation. The 1H NMR data of 1 (Table 1) showed two groups of signals characteristic for a matrine-type alkaloid at δH 4.29 (1H, dd, J = 12.8, 4.0 Hz) and 3.11 (1H, br t, J = 12.8 Hz) and at 4.09 (1H, dd, J = 12.8, 7.2 Hz) and 3.80 (1H, br t, J = 12.8 Hz)14. In addition, two coupled olefinic protons [δH 7.30 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.51 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz)] were distinguished by NMR analysis. The 13C-NMR data (Table 1) accounted for 30 carbon signals, classified as four sp2 quaternary carbons including two lactam-CO signals at δC 170.9 and 164.6, two sp2 and eight sp3 methines, and 16 methylenes. Six sp2 carbons accounted for 4 out of the 12 degrees of unsaturation, and the remaining 8 degrees required that 1 is an octacyclic system.
Table 1.
1H (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) Data of Ochrocephalamine A (1) in CD3OD
| No | δH (mult, J) | δC | no. | δH (mult, J) | δC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2.82 (m)a 2.07 (m) a |
57.8 | 2′ | 2.82 (m) a 2.07 (m) a |
58.3 |
| 3 | 1.56–1.65 (m) a | 22.2 | 3′ | 1.56–1.65 (m) a | 21.6 |
| 4 | 1.79 (m) a | 27.8 | 4′ | 1.67–1.71 (m) a | 28.7 |
| 5 | 2.25 (m) | 32.9 | 5′ | 1.80 (m) | 37.5 |
| 6 | 2.33 (t, 4) | 61.5 | 6′ | 2.29 (br s) | 65.6 |
| 7 | 3.03 (br s) | 39.5 | 7′ | 1.89 (m) | 42.6 |
| 8 | 2.15 (m) | 27.5 | 8′ | 2.44–2.50(m) | 28.4 |
| 9 | 1.56–1.65 (m) a | 22.2 | 9′ | 1.56–1.65 (m) a | 21.3 |
| 10 | 2.82 (m) a 2.07 (m) a |
57.6 | 10′ | 2.82 (m) a 2.07 (m) a |
58.2 |
| 11 | 147.7 | 11′ | 3.94 (m) | 53.8 | |
| 12 | 6.51 (d, 7.6) | 106.6 | 12′ | 2.14 (m) | 29.8 |
| 13 | 7.30 (d, 7.6) | 135.7 | 13′ | 3.38 (m) | 30.0 |
| 14 | 130.1 | 14′ | 2.62(dd, 16.0, 4.0) 2.46(dd, 16.0, 8.0) |
37.5 | |
| 15 | 164.6 | 15′ | 170.9 | ||
| 17 | 4.09 (dd, 12.8, 7.2) 3.80 (br t, 12.8) |
45.5 | 17′ | 4.29 (dd, 12.8, 4.0) 3.11 (br t, 12.8) |
43.7 |
overlapped.
Comprehensive analysis of the 1D NMR data suggested that 1 contains two matrine-type alkaloid moieties, sophoramine and matrine15. Considering the octacyclic ring system of 1, this compound was likely a dimeric alkaloid of sophoramine and matrine connected through a C-C bond. Accordingly, the methine of sophoramine at C-14 (δC 116.4) and methylene of matrine at C-13 (δC 19.2)15 were replaced by the quaternary carbon (δC 130.1) and methine (δC 30.0), respectively, in 1. The HMBC correlations from H-13 to C-15, C-11 and C-13′, H2-14′ to C-15′, C-13′ and C-14, H-13′ to C-15′ and C-14′, and H2-12′ to C-7′, C-11′, C-13′ and C-14 confirmed the C-14–C-13′connection. Thus, the gross planar structure of ochrocephalamine A was established as shown (Figure 2a).
Figure 2.
a) key HMBC correlations of 1, b) X-ray crystal structure of 1.
Determinations of the stereo configurations of 1 were particularly challenging. The ROESY correlations of H-17′α to H-5′, H-6′ to H-7′ indicated H-5′, H-6′ and H-7′ were α configuration10. H-11α was assigned in β-configuration on the basis of the mutual ROESY between H-17′β and H-11′10. The relative configuration of H-13′ could not be determined by a ROESY experiment due to unobserved correlations between H-11′ and H-13′ as well as H-11′ and H-14′. Additionally, the relative configuration of H-5, H-6 and H-7 also can’t be determined by ROESY experiment due to unobserved correlations between one of them with another confirmed proton configuration. Thus, we attempted to prepare crystals of 1 for X-ray determination. Eventually, a single crystal of this compound was obtained from EtOH. The connection between C-14 and C-13′ was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic diffraction with CuKα radiation and the relative configurations of H-5, H-6, H-7 and H-13′ were α-configuration (Figure 2b)13,16. The absolute configurations of 1 were also determined by the refined Hooft parameter value 0.01(6) for 1892 Bijovet pairs with a probability of 1.000 as shown in Figure 2b16.
From a biogenetic point of view, matrine could react with known sophoridine through a Michael addition reaction to give the intermediate B. Aromatization of this intermediate would then yield 1.
We evaluated the contact toxicity of 1 against Spodoptera litura third-instar larvae by the micro-drip method. One μL of 1 (3 mg/mL in EtOH) was dropped on the pronotum of larvae. After five days, 50% of larvae were killed. In cytotoxicity assays, compound 1 was not active against A549, KB, KB-VIN, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines (ED50 > 20 μM).
O. ochrocephala is widely distributed in the grasslands of eastern and central Asia, Australia, and western North and South America, where it poses an extreme risk to grazing animals, resulting in a chronic neurological disease1,3. The indolizidine alkaloid swainsonine is claimed as the constituent poisonous to livestock3. In view of the plant itself, poisonous secondary metabolites can improve the plant’s chances of survival and reproduction by deterring animals, such as sheep, cattle, and horses. In addition, quinolizidine alkaloids8–9, 17, such as 1, play an important role in defense against insects. Biogenetically, indolizidine and quinolizidine alkaloids originate from the same precursor L-lysine18. The use of one biogenetic pathway to produce two different types of alkaloids involved in plant defense against both livestock and insects, respectively, is a smart and efficient strategy to combat the survival challenge.
Supplementary Material
Figure 1.

The structure of ochrocephalamine A (1)
Scheme 1.
Biogenetic pathway proposed of ochrocephalamine A (1)
Ochrocephalamine A (1) was isolated from Oxytropis ochrocephala Bunge.
The poisonous plant O. ochrocephala poses an extreme risk to grazing animals.
Compound 1 is a dimeric matrine-type alkaloid.
Its structure was solved from spectral data and single-crystal X-ray diffraction.
Compound 1 showed contact toxicity against Spodoptera litura third-instar larvae.
Acknowledgments
The work was supported financially by the Special Scientific Research Fund of Agriculture Public Welfare Industry (Grant No. 201203062), the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (31360084, 31660103), and Guizhou High-level Innovative Talent to Chengjian Tan. Partial support was supplied by NIH Grant CA177584 from the National Cancer Institute awarded to Kuo-Hsiung Lee. We are grateful to Dr. X.-N. Li for help with the X-ray diffraction analysis.
Footnotes
NMR spectra, bioactivity assay, and the X-ray crystallographic data (CIF) of 1 are available free of charge via the Internet at http://
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Lu H, Wang SS, Zhou QW, Zhao YN, Zhao BY. Rangeland J. 2012;34:329–339. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Academia Sinica. Flora of China. 2. Vol. 42. Science Press; Beijing: 1998. p. 21. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Molyneux RJ, James LF. Science. 1982;216:190–191. doi: 10.1126/science.6801763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cao GR, Li SJ, Duan DX, Zhao XW. J Northwest Sci-Tech Univ Agri For. 1989;17:1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Meng XZ, Hu XQ, Zhang RM, You YT. Chin Trad Herb Drug. 1994;25:61–64. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li X, Zhang SD, Jin HZ, Dong F, Shan L, Zhang WD. Nat Prod Res. 2013;27:554–557. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2012.678350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sun RQ, Jia ZJ, Cheng DL, Zhu ZQ. Planta Med. 1992;58:211–213. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-961432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tan C-J, Liu L-N, Bi-sihaletu H, Tang H-M, Zhao B-Y. Prog Vet Med. 2015;35:82–85. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tan C-J, Liu L-N, Tang H-M, Shi B-Y, Ran J-Q, Zhao B-Y. Nar Pro Res Dev. 2015;27:1365–1367. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tan CJ, Yi P, Goto M, Morris-Natschke SL, Liu LN, Lee KH, Zhao BY. Helv Chim Acta. 2016;99:225–227. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang LS, You YJ, Wang SQ, Liu X, Liu BM, Wang JN, Lin X, Chen MS, Liang G, Yang H. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012;22:4100–4102. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.04.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tan C-J, Zhao Yu, Goto M, Hsieh KY, Yang X-M, Morris-Natschke SL, Liu L-N, Zhao B-Y, Lee KH. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26:1495–1497. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ochrocephalamine A (1): yellow crystals (EtOH); mp 159–161 °C; ESIMS m/z 491 [M + H]+; HREIMS at 490.3296 [M]+ (calcd. 490.3308, C30H42N4O2); [α]D 24 +32.2 (c 0.48, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (logε) 202 nm (4.2), 311 nm (3.9), 373 nm (2.3); IR (KBr) vmax 2932, 2860, 2805, 2764, 2745, 1639, 1597, and 1554 cm–1; 1H and 13C NMR data (Table 1). Crystal data for 1: C30H42N4O2•6(H2O), M = 598.77, monoclinic, a = 13.0528(3) Å, b =8.3014(2) Å, c = 14.8105(4) Å, α = 90.00°, β = 101.6050(10)°, γ = 90.00°, V = 1572.01(7) Å3, T = 100(2) K, space group P21, Z = 2, μ(CuKα) = 0.745 mm−1, 13217 reflections measured, 4874 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0386). The final R1 values were 0.0521 (I > 2σ(I)). The final wR(F2) values were 0.1565 (I > 2σ (I)). The final R1 values were 0.0525 (all data). The final wR(F2) values were 0.1572 (all data). The goodness of fit on F2 was 1.082. Flack parameter = −0.3(2). The Hooft parameter is 0.01(6) for 1892 Bijvoet pairs. Deposited to Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center with No. CCDC 1449099.
- 14.Liu X-J, Cao M-A, Li W-H, Shen C-S, Yan S-Q, Yuan C-S. Fitoterapia. 2010;81:524–527. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Galasso V, Asaro F, Berti F, Pergolese B, Kovac B, Pichierri F. Chem Phys. 2006;330:457–468. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hooft RWW, Straver LH, Spek AL. J Appl Crystallogr. 2008;41:96–103. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807059870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sanchez MDC, Altares P, Pedrosa MM, Burbano C, Cuadrado C, Goyoaga C, Muzquiz M, Jimenez-Martinez C, Davila-Ortiz G. Food Chemistry. 2005;90:347–355. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu L-J, Lou H-X, Zhou J. The Chemistry of Natural Products. 6. People’s Medical Publishing House; Beijing: 2012. pp. 379–380. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


