Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Ecology and Evolution logoLink to Ecology and Evolution
. 2016 Dec 20;7(1):277–284. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2577

An exotic parasitoid provides an invasional lifeline for native parasitoids

Joanna K Konopka 1,2,3,✉, Tim Haye 3, Tara Gariepy 2, Peter Mason 4, David Gillespie 5, Jeremy N McNeil 1
PMCID: PMC5215073  PMID: 28070291

Abstract

The introduction of an exotic species may alter food webs within the ecosystem and significantly affect the biodiversity of indigenous species at different trophic levels. It has been postulated that recent introduction of the brown marmorated stinkbug (Halyomorpha halys (Stål)) represents an evolutionary trap for native parasitoids, as they accept H. halys egg masses as a host but produce no viable progeny. Interspecific interactions between European egg parasitoid, Trissolcus cultratus (Mayr), and an Asian parasitoid, Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead), were assessed by providing egg masses to T. cultratus at various time intervals following the initial parasitization by T. japonicus. The suitability of the host for the parasitoid development was re‐assessed by providing T. cultratus with fresh and frozen egg masses of various ages. The likelihood of T. cultratus being able to attack previously parasitized egg masses was determined by assessing the duration of egg mass guarding behavior by T. japonicus following parasitization. The results of experiments examining the interspecific interactions between a native European egg parasitoid, T. cultratus, and an Asian parasitoid, T. japonicus (a candidate for the biological control of H. halys), showed that the native species can act as facultative hyperparasitoid of the exotic one. Although this is only possible during certain stages of T. japonicus development, the presence of the introduced parasitoid may reduce the impact of the evolutionary trap for indigenous parasitoid species. There is a possibility that the occurrence of facultative hyperparasitism between scelionid parasitoids associated with stinkbugs is common. This resulting intraguild predation could promote conservation and stabilization of natural communities by impacting the diversity and population dynamics of native stinkbugs and their parasitoids (e.g., by allowing native parasitoids to avoid wasting reproductive effort on unsuitable hosts), or reduce success of biological control programs (e.g., by reducing the population size of the exotic parasitoids).

Keywords: biological control, brown marmorated stinkbug, egg parasitoids, evolutionary trap, facultative hyperparasitoid, larval competition

1. Introduction

Invasive species may pose major threats to the biodiversity of native species at the same or higher trophic levels due to competition, predation, or facilitation (Elton, 2000; Pimentel et al., 2000; Rodriguez, 2006; Schmitz & Simberloff, 1997; Simberloff, 1981). Furthermore, the establishment of one exotic species can facilitate the establishment and spread of additional nonindigenous species, potentially leading to synergistic, negative effects, referred to as “invasional meltdown” (Simberloff, 2006; Simberloff & Von Holle, 1999). In contrast, the establishment of an invasive species may benefit a native one in a number of different ways, such as being a “trophic subsidy” by providing a new exploitable resource for native species at a higher trophic level (Rodriguez, 2006).

Indigenous natural enemies will benefit from the presence of an exotic host if their survival and/or reproduction is enhanced by exploiting exotic species as a trophic subsidy. Conversely, if previously reliable cues are no longer associated with adaptive outcomes following the invasion of nonindigenous species, this could result in an evolutionary trap that reduces the fitness and reproductive success of the native organism (Berthon, 2015; Schlaepfer, Runge, & Sherman, 2002; Schlaepfer et al., 2005). If a native parasitoid accepts an invasive species as a host, but fails to complete development, then the host becomes an evolutionary trap for the native species (Abram et al., 2014; Schlaepfer et al., 2002). However, an evolutionary trap is not necessarily inescapable (Berthon, 2015) and may be circumvented if the organism learns avoidance behavior, or develops mechanical and/or physiological means that permit it to exploit the host (Keeler & Chew, 2008; Phillips & Shine, 2004).

The potential of an evolutionary trap exists with the widespread establishment of the invasive pest, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), in Europe and North America because H. halys eggs are readily attacked by native Trissolcus Ashmead and Telenomus Haliday parasitoid wasp species (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) (Figure 1), but they are unsuitable for development of larvae of these parasitoids (Abram et al., 2014; Haye et al., 2015). The impact of this evolutionary trap for native parasitoids may be further exacerbated by the proposed introduction of the Asian parasitoid (Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead)) as a classical biological control agent against H. halys in countries where it has been detected (Rice et al., 2014). In fact, two adventive introductions into the USA already occurred (Talamas, Johnson, & Buffington, 2015; Talamas, Herlihy, et al., 2015; Milnes et al., 2016).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Female of Trissolcus cultratus on Halyomopha halys egg mass

Interspecific interactions between parasitoids can influence community structure which is important, not only from an ecological but also from a practical (biological control) perspective (Boivin & Brodeur, 2006). A thorough understanding of these interactions is critical to estimate the potential direct and indirect effects, positive or negative, associated with the introduction of the exotic parasitoid against an exotic pest. Although in‐host competition between parasitoid larvae can have negative consequences [e.g., death, reduced fitness (Godfray, 1994; Boivin & Brodeur, 2006)], there may be benefits in the form of interspecific facilitation (Cusumano, Peri, & Colazza, 2016; Poelman et al., 2014). For example, secretions injected by heterospecific or conspecific parasitoid females ovipositing into the same host may act synergistically to overcome the host immune response, or teratocytes released by one species may provide additional nutritional resources for the other species, thereby facilitating the development of the competitively superior parasitoid.

There is little information regarding interspecific interactions between native and exotic egg parasitoids associated with Pentatomidae, so in this study we determined the outcomes of larval competitive interactions between the exotic T. japonicus and the native T. cultratus, which might naturally occur following either an intentional introduction of T. japonicus as a biological control agent for H. halys in Europe, or an accidental one. This host–parasitoid model system presents an excellent opportunity to assess the possibility of different interspecific interactions (e.g., competition, facilitation), between a native and exotic parasitoid on an invasive host (H. halys), and evaluate the impacts of these interactions from basic and applied perspectives.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Stinkbug rearing

A colony of H. halys was established from individuals collected in Zurich, Switzerland, in 2012 and maintained in continuous rearing on a diet of organic beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and corn (Zea mays L) at 26°C, 70%RH, 16L:8D photoperiod in Bug Dorms (50 × 50 × 50, Mega View). Fresh‐cut branches of cherry (Prunus avium L.), buckthorn (Rhamnus sp.) and hazelnut (Corylus sp.) were also provided when available. Strips of black mesh were provided as oviposition substrate. Eggs were collected daily and maintained under the same conditions.

2.2. Parasitoid rearing

Trissolcus japonicus, originally collected around Beijing (China), were maintained on fresh H. halys egg masses. Trissolcus cultratus, collected from frozen, sentinel H. halys egg masses in the Delémont valley (Canton Jura, Switzerland), were maintained on frozen (at −80°C and then thawed 30 min prior to use) H. halys egg masses. Parasitoids (mated, ≥2 days old) were held in a clear plastic container (10 cm diameter, 5 cm height) with 10% honey water solution as a food source and 8–10 fresh or frozen H. halys egg masses provided twice a week. Parasitized egg masses were kept at 26°C, 60% humidity, and 16L:8D photoperiod.

Upon the initial establishment of the laboratory colonies of T. japonicus and T. cultratus, specimens were sent to E. Talamas (Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA) and M. C. Bon (USDA‐ARS European Biological Control Laboratory, Montferrier sur Lez, France) for morphological and molecular identification, respectively.

2.3. Time‐course developmental study

All assays were carried out in plastic Petri plates (5 × 1 cm) into which females were introduced for the duration of the experiment, and observations were made (using a stereomicroscope) between 0800 and 1300 h at 26°C, 60% relative humidity, and 16L:8D photoperiod. Randomly selected T. japonicus females (4 days old, mated, naïve) were offered fresh (<24 h) H. halys egg masses (12 eggs/mass) and observed until all the eggs in the mass were parasitized (as indicated by marking behavior) or until female left the egg mass for >10 min. Trissolcus cultratus females (4 days old, mated, naïve) were provided fully parasitized egg masses (n = 20 per time interval) that were attacked by T. japonicus 0 hr, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 days earlier and observed until they had parasitized the entire egg mass, or left the mass for >10 min. As controls, fresh and frozen H. halys egg masses (12 eggs/mass) of the corresponding ages were offered to T. cultratus females to determine the effect of host age and host necrosis on acceptance and suitability for development (n = 10 per time interval). For frozen egg controls, the eggs were reared for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days prior to being frozen and exposed to the parasitoid. This approach ensured that parasitoid was provided hosts at different stages of embryonic development. The number of eggs attempted (drilled) and parasitized (marked) by each T. cultratus female was recorded. Egg masses were kept for 3 weeks and all adult parasitoids obtained were identified to species based on morphological characteristics including facial striae and clypeal setae (Talamas, Johnson, & Buffington, 2015; Talamas, Herlihy, et al., 2015a, b).

2.4. Egg mass (patch) guarding behavior

To determine how long T. japonicus females guard parasitized egg masses, 20 egg masses (28 ± 1 eggs/egg mass) were exposed to randomly selected 4 days old, mated, naïve females in small (5 × 1 cm) plastic Petri plates inside large Petri dish arenas (15 × 2 cm). Once the egg mass was parasitized, a second small Petri plate with a fresh egg mass was placed in the arena and the female's guarding behavior was verified every 6 hr until she left the parasitized egg mass.

2.5. Statistical analysis

The proportions of eggs drilled and marked were arcsine‐transformed (to normalize the data) and analyzed with a two‐way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post hoc test. In cases where the effects of egg mass age and/or state were significant, further one‐way ANOVA analyses with Tukey post hoc tests were carried out. The developmental outcomes from parasitized eggs for each egg state were analyzed using separate χ2 tests, with the p‐value for each cell calculated based on resulting residuals, and compared to Bonferroni corrected p‐values (indicating if the proportion of each developmental outcome was significantly different from a mean proportion of that outcome across the egg age or egg state). All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS (v.23) statistical software.

3. Results

3.1. Host acceptance behavior

Trissolcus cultratus females readily attacked and marked H. halys egg masses, but the relative proportions of drilled and marked eggs varied based on age and state (i.e., parasitized, fresh, frozen) of the egg masses (Figure 2a,b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Mean proportion (±SE) of (unparasitized) fresh or frozen Halyomopha halys egg masses, as well as fresh egg masses previously parasitized by Trissolcus japonicus which were (a) drilled and (b) marked by Trissolcus cultratus as a function of age/time since parasitization by T. japonicus. Bars not sharing the same letters are statistically different based on Tukey's post hoc test

The proportion of control H. halys egg masses that T. cultratus females drilled (fresh: F (5,59) = 1.56, p = .19; frozen: F (5,59) = 1.51, p = .20) or marked (fresh: F (5,59) = 0.60, p = .70; frozen: F (5,59) = 0.86, p = .51) did not differ as a function of egg mass age, averaging >93% in all cases. A similar trend was observed when females were provided 0‐, 3‐, 4‐, and 5‐day‐old parasitized. H. halys eggs (Figure 2a,b). However, significantly fewer egg masses parasitized by T. japonicus one and two days prior to testing were drilled (F (5,119) = 37.1, p < .001) and marked (F (5,117) = 26.4, p < .001; Figure 2a,b) by T. cultratus females.

3.2. Developmental success and interspecific larval competition

The proportion of T. cultratus larvae successfully developing in fresh (χ2 (10, N = 707) = 76.2, p < .001) and frozen (χ2 (5, N = 663) = 169.1, p < .001) H. halys eggs varied as a function of egg mass age. Less than 1% of <24‐h‐old eggs supported the development of T. cultratus, while no parasitoids emerged from those >24 h (Figure 3a), despite observed drilling and marking behavior (Figure 2a,b). However, parasitoid attack did reduce the number of H. halys that emerged. In contrast, some T. cultratus (4%–54%) successfully developed in 0‐ to 4‐day‐old frozen egg masses although the proportion declined with age of the egg mass (Figure 3b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Mean proportion of Trissolcus japonicus, Trissolcus cultratus, Halyomopha halys nymph or nothing emerging from different aged H. halys eggs that were (a) fresh, (b) frozen or (c) multiparasitized by T. japonicus and T. cultratus at different time intervals (ages). Asterisks (*) indicate proportions of each outcome for fresh, frozen, and multiparasitized eggs that is significantly different from a mean proportion of that outcome across the egg age (χ2 tests with Bonferroni corrections)

In contrast to the pattern seen with fresh, unparasitized H. halys eggs (Figure 3a), some T. cultratus were able to successfully complete development when exploiting eggs that had previously been parasitized by the exotic T. japonicus (Figure 3c). The relative developmental success of both parasitoids was influenced by the time elapsed between T. japonicus and T. cultratus females ovipositing (χ2 (10, N = 942) = 746.8, p < .001). If the time delay was 2 days or less, then at least 75% of the hosts gave rise to T. japonicus while <15% gave rise to T. cultratus. A similar pattern was observed when the time delay between oviposition was 5 days, but if there was a 3‐day difference, then the majority of parasitized host eggs produced T. cultratus. Interestingly, when there was a 4‐day time difference between oviposition, very few parasitoids of either species emerged, whereas in the 5‐day interval treatment, a high proportion of T. japonicus adults emerged (Figure 3c).

3.3. Egg mass guarding behavior

Following parasitization of fresh H. halys egg masses (28 eggs/mass), 90% of T. japonicus females guarded the masses for <6 or 12 hr and were found either parasitizing a second egg mass, or exploring Petri plates in search of alternate recourses. Only a single female remained on the parasitized egg mass for 24 hr.

4. Discussion

The intertrophic level effects of introducing a novel potential host into an ecosystem will depend in part on the “decision‐making” behaviors of parasitoids that are based on the use of reliable cues during host habitat location, host location, host acceptance, and host suitability (Vinson, 1976) to maximize reproductive success (Schlaepfer et al., 2005; Williams & Nichols, 1984). Thus, if a new host is unsuitable for development, this could result in an evolutionary trap for parasitoids unless at some stage in the foraging process females avoid unsuitable hosts (Phillips & Shine, 2004) or can overcome the defensive barriers of the host (Keeler & Chew, 2008). Our results support the hypothesis that the introduction of H. halys represents a potential evolutionary trap that could impact the diversity and population dynamics of native Pentatomidae and their scelionid parasitoids (Abram et al., 2014), given that native parasitoids accept H. halys as a host but fail to complete development in healthy eggs (Abram et al., 2014; Haye et al., 2015). It has also been observed that introduced species often facilitate one another's establishment, resulting in an “invasional meltdown” (Simberloff, 2006; Simberloff & Von Holle, 1999), and even the introduction of a beneficial species for biological control may interact with other introduced species in a way that negatively impacts native species (Howarth, 1985; Messing, Roitberg, & Brodeur, 2006; Schellhorn et al., 2002). The facilitation of native species by nonindigenous ones has been largely overlooked (Rodriguez, 2006) as has interspecific facilitation among parasitoids (Cusumano et al., 2016).

Our results indicate that the introduction of T. japonicus as a biological control agent against H. halys may actually provide native Trissolcus species a partial escape from the evolutionary trap created by the presence of H. halys, because, under certain conditions, T. cultratus may successfully develop in H. halys eggs previously attacked by T. japonicus (Figure 3c). To our knowledge, this is the first example of interspecific facilitation among egg parasitoids and the first example of a secondary invader (T. japonicus) potentially facilitating the use of a primary invader (H. halys) as host by a native species (T. cultratus). The time window for this “invasional lifeline” will be quite narrow for several reasons (Figure 4) and will only exist where T. japonicus becomes well established in areas where H. halys are found.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

General schematic showing the temporal pattern of suitability of parasitized and unparasitized Halyomopha halys eggs for Trissolcus cultratus as a function of their age

We assume that factors injected by T. japonicus females to overcome host defences allow T. cultratus to exploit H. halys as a primary parasitoid in a small percentage of attacks that occur immediately after T. japonicus has oviposited (see day 0 in Figure 3c). However, as T. japonicus females remained on the egg mass for 6–12 hr following oviposition (patch guarding), the likelihood of T. cultratus females finding recently parasitized, unguarded H. halys egg masses would be low under natural conditions.

The fact that T. cultratus females attacked and marked significantly fewer H. halys eggs 1 and 2 days after they had been previously attacked by T. japonicus when compared to day 0 (Figure 2c), suggested that they are responding to the presence of the developing T. japonicus larvae rather than the presence of a marking pheromone. Avoiding eggs at this stage of T. japonicus development would be adaptive, as few or no T. cultratus adults emerged from those that were attacked (Figure 3c), suggesting that the early T. japonicus larval instars equipped with sickle‐shaped mandibles are superior competitors and effectively eliminate eggs or newly hatched T. cultratus larvae. In contrast, T. cultratus was quite successful when attacking H. halys eggs containing fully grown T. japonicus larvae (e.g., 3 days following the initial parasitization by T. japonicus; Figure 3c). In this case, T. cultratus acts as a facultative hyperparasitoid on T. japonicus, a tactic used by some egg parasitoids in an environment with limited, unexploited resource (Brodeur, 2000). For example, the generalist egg parasitoid, Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Vassiliev) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), is capable of exploiting pentatomid egg masses either as a primary parasitoid or as a facultative hyperparasitoid when eggs have already been parasitized by Trissolcus basalis (Wollaston) (Cusumano et al., 2013).

Even though T. cultratus females readily accept and mark eggs attacked 4 and 5 days previously by T. japonicus (Figure 2a,b), they are no longer suitable hosts (Figure 3c). This may be due to the salivary secretions produced by parasitoid larvae just prior to pupation that solidify to provide protection from foreign bodies (Safavi, 1968) and the subsequent sclerotization of the pupal exoskeleton (Volkoff & Colazza, 1992). Interestingly, this is similar to the situation observed when T. cultratus females were provided H. halys eggs that had been frozen 3–5 days after being laid (Figure 3b); while eggs were attacked and marked (Figure 1), very few progeny are produced (Figure 3) suggesting that the advanced nymphal stages of H. halys were unsuitable for T. cultratus larvae. This effect of host developmental stage has been observed in other Trissolcus species, with females attacking all developmental stages of host eggs and successful parasitism decreasing significantly in eggs >3 days old (Awadalla, 1996; Kivan & Kilic, 2005).

As noted, facultative hyperparasitism has not been extensively studied and it is possible that many scelionid parasitoids associated with stinkbugs use this strategy. Thus, T. japonicus may also develop as a facultative hyperparasitoid on congeneric species and could exploit native scelionids developing within other pentatomid species. Intraguild predation in the form of facultative hyperparasitism may reduce the success of a biological control program (Boivin & Brodeur, 2006; Messing et al., 2006) or promote conservation and stabilization of natural communities (Müller & Brodeur, 2002). Consequently, we suggest that the possibility of facultative hyperparasitism should be investigated when assessing risk factors to native species following the introduction of exotics for classical biological control.

The actual impact of this potential evolutionary trap will depend on a number of other factors, such as (1) the relative densities of the introduced and indigenous host egg masses and (2) the degree to which native parasitoids prefer native hosts over introduced ones, as the impact would be lesser if females of different species discriminate in their selection of oviposition sites. Furthermore, as T. japonicus is a generalist parasitoid of Pentatomidae, it could exploit native stinkbug egg masses following its introduction as a classical biological control agent against H. halys (Talamas, Johnson, & Buffington, 2015; Talamas, Herlihy, et al., 2015). If this is the case, one would predict that interspecific competition could result in a significant decline in native parasitoid populations, especially if, under field conditions, indigenous species readily accept H. halys eggs. However, as noted above for native species, the outcome will also depend on whether T. japonicus preferentially oviposit in H. halys egg masses. Clearly, the preference of foraging native parasitoids and T. japonicus must be evaluated in order to assess the real impact that H. halys will have on food webs following its introduction into new ecosystems. In the long term, it is possible that native parasitoids successfully developing on H. halys eggs previously parasitized by T. japonicus will learn to recognize and seek out cues indicative of both the acceptability and developmental suitability of H. halys as a host. It is therefore essential that all potential interactions between native and exotic egg parasitoids be investigated as this information will be vital to predict potential ecological outcomes, including the efficacy of biological control programs against H. halys.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by NSERC PGS Scholarship and ESC Research Travel Scholarship to JKK, and funding to Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada. We would like to thank Elijah Talamas (Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA) and Marie‐Claude Bon (USDA‐ARS European Biological Control Laboratory, Montferrier sur Lez, France) for the identification of the parasitoids from our laboratory colonies. The authors thank two anonymous reviewers and P. Abram for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Konopka, J. K. , Haye, T. , Gariepy, T. , Mason, P. , Gillespie, D. and McNeil, J. N. (2017), An exotic parasitoid provides an invasional lifeline for native parasitoids. Ecology and Evolution, 7: 277–284. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2577

References

  1. Abram, P. K. , Gariepy, T. D. , Boivin, G. , & Brodeur, J. (2014). An invasive stink bug as an evolutionary trap for an indigenous egg parasitoid Biological Invasions, 16(7), 1387–1395. [Google Scholar]
  2. Awadalla, S. S. (1996). Influence of temperature and age of Nezara viridula L. eggs on the scelionid egg parasitoid, Trissolcus megallocephalus (Ashm.) (Hym., Scelionidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 120(1–5), 445–448. [Google Scholar]
  3. Berthon, K. (2015). How do native species respond to invaders? Mechanistic and trait‐based perspectives. Biological Invasions, 17(8), 2199–2211. [Google Scholar]
  4. Boivin, G. , & Brodeur, J. (2006). Intra‐ and interspecific interactions among parasitoids: Mechanisms, outcomes and biological control In Brodeur J. & Boivin G. (Eds.) Trophic and guild in biological interactions control (pp. 123–144). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brodeur, J. (2000). Host specificity zrand trophic relationships of hyperparasitoids In hochberg M. E. & Ives A. R. (Eds.), Parasitoid Population Biology, (pp 163–183) Princeton University Press, Preinceton, NJ, USA. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cusumano, A. , Peri, E. , & Colazza, S. (2016). Interspecific competition/facilitation among insect parasitoids. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 14, 12–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cusumano, A. , Amodeo, V. , McNeil, J. N. , & Colazza, S. (2013). Intraguild interactions between egg parasitoids: Window of opportunity and fitness costs for a facultative hyperparasitoid. PLoS One, 8(5), e64768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elton, C. S. (2000). The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London, UK: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Godfray, H. (1994). Parasitoids: Behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Haye, T. , Fischer, S. , Zhang, J. , & Gariepy, T. (2015). Can native egg parasitoids adopt the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), in Europe? Journal of Pest Science, 88(4), 693–705. [Google Scholar]
  11. Howarth, F. (1985). Impacts of alien land arthropods and mollusks on native plants and animals in Hawaii In Stone C. P. & Scott M. (Eds.) Hawaii's terrestrial ecosystems: Preservation and management (pp. 149–179). Honolulu, HI, USA: University of Hawaii Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Keeler, M. S. , & Chew, F. S. (2008). Escaping an evolutionary trap: Preference and performance of a native insect on an exotic invasive host. Oecologia, 156(3), 559–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kivan, M. , & Kilic, N. (2005). Effects of storage at low‐temperature of various heteropteran host eggs on the egg parasitoid, Trissolcus semistriatus . BioControl, 50(4), 589–600. [Google Scholar]
  14. Messing, R. , Roitberg, B. , & Brodeur, J. (2006). Measuring and predicting indirect impacts of biological control: Competition, displacement and secondary interactions. In Bigler F., Babendreier D. & Kuhlmann U. (Eds.) Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods: Methods and risk assessment. 64–77. CABI Publishing: Cambridge, MA, USA. [Google Scholar]
  15. Milnes, J. M. , Wiman, N. G. , Talamas, E. J. , Brunner, J. F. , Hoelmer, K. A. , Buffington, M. L. , & Beers, E. H. (2016). Discovery of an exotic egg parasitoid of the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) in the Pacific Northwest. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 118(3), 466–470. [Google Scholar]
  16. Müller, C. B. , & Brodeur, J. (2002). Intraguild predation in biological control and conservation biology. Biological Control, 25(3), 216–223. [Google Scholar]
  17. Phillips, B. L. , & Shine, R. (2004). Adapting to an invasive species: Toxic cane toads induce morphological change in Australian snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(49), 17150–17155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pimentel, D. , Lach, L. , Zuniga, R. , & Morrison, D. (2000). Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience, 50(1), 53–65. [Google Scholar]
  19. Poelman, E. H. , Gols, R. , Gumovsky, A. V. , Cortesero, A.‐M. , Dicke, M. , & Harvey, J. A. (2014). Food plant and herbivore host species affect the outcome of intrinsic competition among parasitoid larvae. Ecological Entomology, 39(6), 693–702. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rice, K. B. , Bergh, C. J. , Bergmann, E. J. , Biddinger, D. J. , Dieckhoff, C. , & Dively, G. . (2014). Biology, ecology, and management of brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 5(3), 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rodriguez, L. F. (2006). Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur. Biological Invasions, 8(4), 927–939. [Google Scholar]
  22. Safavi, M. (1968). Etude biologique et écologique des Hyménoptères parasites des oeufs des punaises des céréales. Entomophaga, 13, 381–495. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schellhorn, N. A. , Kuhman, T. R. , Olson, A. C. , & Ives, A. R. (2002). Competition between native and introduced parasitoids of aphids: Nontarget effects and biological control. Ecology, 83(10), 2745–2757. [Google Scholar]
  24. Schlaepfer, M. A. , Runge, M. C. , & Sherman, P. W. (2002). Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17(10), 474–480. [Google Scholar]
  25. Schlaepfer, M. A. , Sherman, P. W. , Blossey, B. , & Runge, M. C. (2005). Introduced species as evolutionary traps. Ecology Letters, 8(3), 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  26. Schmitz, D. C. , & Simberloff, D. (1997). Biological invasions: A growing threat. Issues in Science and Technology, 13(4), 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  27. Simberloff, D. (1981). What makes a good island colonist? In Denno R. F. & Dingle H. (Eds.) Insect life history patterns (pp. 195–205). New York, NY, USA: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  28. Simberloff, D. (2006). Invasional meltdown 6 years later: Important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecology Letters, 9(8), 912–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Simberloff, D. , & Von Holle, B. (1999). Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: Invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions, 1(1), 21–32. [Google Scholar]
  30. Talamas, E. , Herlihy, M. V. , Dieckhoff, C. , Hoelmer, K. A. , Buffington, M. , Bon, M.‐C. , & Weber, D. C. (2015). Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae) emerges in North America. Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 43, 119–128. [Google Scholar]
  31. Talamas, E. , Johnson, N. , & Buffington, M. (2015). Key to Nearctic species of Trissolcus Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae), natural enemies of native and invasive stink bugs (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 43, 45–110. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vinson, S. B. (1976). Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology, 21, 109–133. [Google Scholar]
  33. Volkoff, N. , & Colazza, S. (1992). Growth patterns of teratocytes in the immature stages of Trissolcus basalis (Woll.) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), an egg parasitoid of Nezara viridula (L.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 21(4), 323–336. [Google Scholar]
  34. Williams, B. K. , & Nichols, J. D. (1984). Optimal timing in biological processes. The American Naturalist, 123(1), 1–19. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES