Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2015 Sep 28;105(1):46–52. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33456

Wear characteristics of an unconstrained lumbar total disc replacement under a range of in vitro test conditions

Philip J Hyde 1,✉, John Fisher 1, Richard M Hall 1
PMCID: PMC5215667  PMID: 26411540

Abstract

The effect of kinematics, loading and centre of rotation on the wear of an unconstrained total disc replacement have been investigated using the ISO 18192‐1 standard test as a baseline. Mean volumetric wear rate and surface morphological effects were reported. Changing the phasing of the flexions to create a low (but finite) amount of crossing path motion at the bearing surfaces resulted in a significant fall in wear volume. However, the rate of wear was still much larger than previously reported values under zero cross shear conditions. Reducing the load did not result in a significant change in wear rate. Moving the centre of rotation of the disc inferiorly did significantly increase wear rate. A phenomenon of debris re‐attachment on the UHMWPE surface was observed and hypothesised to be due to a relatively harsh tribological operating regime in which lubricant replenishment and particle migration out of the bearing contact zone were limited. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 46–52, 2017.

Keywords: tribology, biotribology, wear, TDR, total disc replacement, Charité, Prodisc, in motion artificial disc

INTRODUCTION

Articulating total disc replacement (TDR) for the natural intervertebral disc (IVD) was first introduced in significant numbers in the 1980s with the Link SB Charité disc (Waldemar Link Gmbh and Co., Hamburg, Germany), originally developed at the Charité Hospital, Berlin.1 A relatively recent version of this design (Charité, DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA) is the subject of this investigation (referred to as “Charité” throughout this article). It is an unconstrained design, meaning that the limits of motion are not mechanically limited and a certain amount of displacement is permitted in the lateral plane, facilitated by the use of a mobile central core of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). The Charité disc has now been replaced by the “In Motion” artificial disc, but the design has essentially remained the same while incorporating minor modifications to the end plates to aid insertion using instrumentation.

The bio‐tribology of replacement joints has been reported extensively and over several decades in the hip2, 3, 4 and knee,5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 but there have been fewer studies of polyethylene wear in TDR.11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 The different biomechanical environment and designs utilised in the spine in comparison to the hip and knee may influence wear of the polyethylene, and potential for osteolysis.17

The initial clinical opinion regarding articulating replacement discs was that wear of the bearing surfaces would not be a major cause of concern, because of much reduced kinematics of operation in everyday activity.18 However, several recent clinical research papers have highlighted adverse tissue reactions found in samples taken from failed artificial TDR procedures.19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 It has been shown that TDRs may potentially suffer from a similar failure mechanisms to other polyethylene based joint replacements in the medium to long‐term.27 The wear of Charité bearings simulated in vitro has been shown to vary from 0.12 mm3 wear per million cycles under zero cross shear motion path kinematics11 (such as those stipulated by the ASTM guidance document F2423‐05) to 20.76 mm3 per million cycles16 when anterior‐poster shear is added to the standard ISO 18192–1 test cycle. There is no data on the wear of UHMWPE TDRs under very small, but non‐zero, crossing path motions that could occur under the wide range of patient‐specific biomechanical conditions. Because of the wide variation in patient weight and muscles forces acting across the functional spinal unit, the axial loading on TDRs will probably vary accordingly between subjects. Previously, Charite TDRs have always been positioned in their test chambers with the CoR of the testing machine set to coincide with the centre of the TDR at the centre of the polyethylene core (Christian Kaddick, personal communication, May 22, 2012; Andrew Dooris, personal communication, January 22, 2014). Since the CoR of the lumbar spinal unit is usually thought to be below the centre of the natural disc,28 it may be more appropriate to position the device in vitro so as to investigate the influence of a more physiological CoR.

The aim of the study presented here was to compare the wear characteristics of Charité TDRs under a range of kinetic conditions, starting with the parameters used in the ISO 18192‐1 standard as the baseline study. Specific research questions arising from the literature were:

  1. What is the effect of reduced (rather than zero) cross shear kinematics at the bearing surface when the ISO 18192‐1 standard motions are used subject to a changed phasing of the flexion and lateral bend motions?

  2. What influence does a reduction in loading cycle have on wear rate when the other ISO standard inputs remain unchanged?

  3. What effect does changing the position of the CoR from a central position (previous tests) to one inferior to the device (i.e., physiologically relevant) have on the wear rate?

METHODOLOGY

Four individual wear test regimes were applied to Charité TDR components: standard ISO 18192‐1, low cross shear (LXS), lowered axial loading (LL) and changed CoR position (ΔCoR). A six‐station Leeds SimSol spine simulator (Simulation Solutions Ltd, Stockport, UK) was used throughout. A detailed methodology has been described in detail elsewhere.14 A total of 10 commercially available Charité (DePuy Spine, Reynham, MA) lumbar disc (Figure 1, left) were used for wear testing. In the first four experiments six TDRs were tested kinematically and one was used as a dynamically loaded soak control. For the final ISO test (ISO3) and following “changed CoR” study (ΔCoR) fresh discs were used (n = 3). The samples used were “size 2” with core heights of 7.5 mm and radius 13 mm with matching cobalt chromium molybdenum (CoCrMo) endplates. The manufacturer states that the Charité UHMWPE bearing core is manufactured from GUR1020 and is gamma sterilised at 2.5–4 MRads.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Charité TDR showing CoCrMo endplates sandwiching the mobile UHMWPE core (left) and schematic (right) showing the position of the CoR used for the wear test studies.

The kinematic and load cycles used in this study were founded on the ISO standard 18192‐1 (referred to as ISO, ISO2 or ISO3 which were all identical tests) and considered to be the baseline test (Table 1). Subsequent alterations to these baseline parameters used to investigate effect on the rates of wear are listed in Table 1. At each 1 million cycle point the simulator test cells were completely stripped and cleaned utilising an enhanced protocol.14 The Charité components were then stored in a temperature controlled measurements lab for stabilisation for 48 h. At this point gravimetric measurements were completed (Mettler AT21 balance Leicester, UK, 0.001 mg resolution).

Table 1.

Experimental Inputs Used for a Range of Testing Conditions on the Unconstrained Total Disc Replacement (parametric changes are highlighted)

Input Study Length (Millions Cycles) Sample Number (n) Input Parameter Input Magnitude Freq (Hz) Phase wrt FE (°) CoR POSITION (wrt Figure 1)
ISO, ISO2, ISO3 Baseline ISO input and repeats 4 6 AF 600–2000 N 2 N/A R1
2 6 AR +2°/−2° 1 +90
2 3 FE +6°/−3° 1 0
LB +2°/−2° 1 −90
LXS Low cross shear 2 6 AF 600–2000 N 2 N/A R1
AR +2°/−2° 1 +90
FE +6°/−3° 1 0
LB +2°/−2° 1 0
LL Low load 4 6 AF 300–1000 N 2 N/A R1
AR +2°/−2° 1 +90
FE +6°/−3° 1 0
LB +2°/−2° 1 −90
ΔCoR Changed centre of rotation position 2 3 AF 600–2000 N 2 N/A R2
AR +2°/−2° 1 +90
FE +6°/−3° 1 0
LB +2°/−2° 1 −90
Open in a new tab

The low cross shear (LXS) experiment was designed to test the effect on wear when there was a small, but finite, amount of crossing path motion at the bearing surface. To do this the FE and LB motions were changed from 90° out of phase to 0° in phase while leaving the axial rotation (AR) input 90° out of phase with the other two articulations. This changed the open elliptical motion path to a narrow elliptical path. Following this the ISO standard was again used but this time with the AF input load reduced by 50%. In the final study using n = 6 the ISO test was repeated (ISO2) to check repeatability of the simulator. For the final experiment three new discs were used and the ISO standard again used as a baseline test (ISO3). Following this the CoR position was changed to be inferior to the lower endplate (R2 in Figure 1), as is the case in vivo.29 The radius (R2) of the Charité endplate bearing face was 13 mm, thus the CoR was chosen to be 13 mm below the upper endplate bearing rather than 3.75 mm as has been used previously in the literature (R1 in Figure 1).

A contacting profilometer (Form Talysurf series, Taylor Hobson, UK) was used to record changes in surface topography after each study. Areas of interest on the UHMWPE core were differentiated according to Figure 2. The CoCrMo endplate bearing surfaces were assessed using a single full trace from edge to edge. Filtering was by Gaussian filter with cut‐off values of 0.8 and 0.25 mm for the UHMWPE core and CoCrMo bearings respectively at a ratio 100:1. On the ISO, LXS, LL, and ISO2 tests statistical analysis used one way ANOVA with post hoc tests using repeated measures (Bonferroni, α = 0.05). A paired t test was used for the ISO3 and ΔCoR study.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Surface profilometry trace positions over the UHMWPE core component.

Optical microscopy was completed using a stereo microscope (Leitz Laborlux 12 ME ST) at 25× magnification and images recorded using a digital camera (Olympus Camedia C‐5050). Scale bars on the images were calibrated using a 1 mm graticule. SEM images were taken using a Phillips XL30 SEM used in secondary electron mode at 20 KV acceleration. UHMWPE cores were gold coated (∼20 nm) and mounted on aluminium stubs with carbon paint to help ensure efficient discharging at the surface. Magnifications between 20× and 5000× were obtained.

RESULTS

The baseline rate of wear derived using standard ISO conditions was 14.4 ± 2.1 mm3 (± StD) per million cycles (Figure 3). Wear rate was reduced significantly (p < 0.01)% to 61% of the baseline result when changed to a lower cross shear (LXS) input (8.8 ± 1.4 mm3). Wear rate was 92% of baseline (13.3 ±3.5 mm3) when the AF input cycle was lowered to 50% of that indicated by the ISO standard, though this was not a significant change (p = 1.00). The final study on these test components was a repeatability test using the ISO standard (ISO2) which returned a similar wear rate (19.0 ± 4.0 mm3) to the first ISO test (p = 0.09), although larger variance was evident, perhaps due to the accumulated wear damage on the bearing. The following experiment utilised three new Charité samples and began with a baseline ISO standard test (ISO3). Wear rate significantly increased (p = 0.02) from 13.2 ± 0.8 mm3 to 125% of baseline (16.3 ± 1.1 mm3) when the CoR position was moved (ΔCoR) from the centre of the UHMWPE core to inferior to the lower baseplate (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Rates of wear for a Charité TDR tested under ISO standard, low cross shear (LXS) and low load (LL) with a final repeated ISO standard test.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

ISO standard experiment (ISO3) followed by a repeated test where the CoR of the bearing was shifted inferiorly.

The visual appearance of the UHMWPE core of the Charité bearing changed over the course of experimentation. The unworn discs had an average roughness (Ra) value of 0.66 µm and periodic waveform which reflected the machined nature of the surface. Throughout the wear studies the average Ra value for the full disc width (ALL, Figure 2) increased significantly over the baseline test but did not change significantly between subsequent studies (Figure 5). Qualitative visual inspection indicated that the wear scars were isotropic in the radial direction from the pole to perimeter. However, the perpendicular traces (RIM, Figure 2) indicated a smoothing of the surface in that direction (RIM, Figure 5). The central areas (POLE, Figure 2) of the UHMWPE cores were generally roughened more than the surrounding surface and elevated above the mean surface form (POLE, Figure 5). Although the ISO and LXS tested discs did not show a significant change in pole area Ra compared to the rest of the disc surface, some roughening at the pole area was still observed. The single soak control disc was measured in the same way and also showed a threefold reduction in Ra at the rim areas but no roughening at the pole (Figure 5). Over 13 million cycles the average Ra of the metallic cups did not change significantly.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Surface topography of the UHMWPE core separated into three trace areas (according to Figure 2).

High magnification micrographs showed that the surface of the UHMWPE was covered in very fine curvilinear abrasive scratches (Figure 6). Magnification of the edge of the roughened area on the pole region of the UHMWPE core (Figure 6, left), shows the apparent reattachment of wear debris.14

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Micrograph images of a UHMWPE core after the ISO standard test (left: edge of the roughened pole area of the core; right: mid 1/3rd of the core).

Secondary electron microscopy was used to further enhance the micrograph detail. The SEM images presented in Figure 7 show an increasing magnification of the debris at the pole area. There appears to be a “transfer” effect, where several layers of UHMWPE have adhered onto the surface, consisting of approximately micron‐sized particles creating layers at the centre and island features surrounding.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Charité SEM images (top to bottom: increase in magnification) of roughened area around the UHMWPE pole region showing appearance of built up surface layers (direction arrowed) and islands.

DISCUSSION

Charité TDRs were subject to four wear test regimes: ISO standard 18192‐1 (ISO, ISO2, ISO3: identical baselines), low cross shear (LXS), lowered axial loading (LL) and changed CoR position (ΔCoR). The ISO standard test produced a level of wear similar to that reported in the literature.16 Using an input cycle with a small amount of cross shear motion (LXS) did reduce wear rate significantly, however, the amount of reduction was small compared to negligible wear reported by Serhan et al.30 when purely curvilinear input motions were used. Thus, wear rate of the Charité disc increases rapidly when the cross shear ratio increases from zero to a small but finite amount. A similar pattern of rapidly increasing wear with increasing cross shear ratio has been observed in UHMWPE pin‐on‐plate experiments by Kang et al.31 There is no previous literature describing unconstrained TDR bearing wear behaviour for kinematic inputs that lie between fully curvilinear (negligible wear) and ISO standard (highly crossing path motions and high wear). Patient disc kinematics in vivo are likely to be widely varied between possible extremes and this work has highlighted that even small amounts of crossing path motion will produce non‐trivial amounts of wear volume and hence particulate debris with the associated risk of osteolysis, which should be considered at the design stage of further TDR evolution.

Although Charité wear was lower when using a 50% reduced load cycle, this was not significantly different to the baseline ISO test and therefore produced relatively high wear rates. This nonlinearity between rate of wear and load applied complements the results of simple pin‐on‐plate testing configurations where polyethylene bearing contact area has been observed to be the main driver of wear factor changes rather than the load or contact pressure applied.32, 33, 34 It is therefore unlikely that a patient with a substantially different body weight would have an appreciably different wear rate for their TDR device.

Previous in vitro testing has been completed by using CoR placed at the centre of the TDR construct, that is, at the centre of the UHMWPE core.11, 16 In vivo, the precise CoR is difficult to determine, but in the natural intervertebral disc it is known to be inferior to the lower vertebral endplate.35 To test the hypothesis that CoR position may have an impact on wear behaviour of the Charité device, the CoR was changed to be inferior to the bottom endplate, at a distance of 13 mm below the upper endplate cup bearing surface. The Charité device showed a significant but modest increase in wear as a result of this change. Preclinical testing of orthopaedic implants should aim to cover an envelope of possible conditions and therefore go beyond minimum compliance to enhance safety.36 Considering patient spinal biomechanics vary considerably, CoR may be a pertinent testing parameter to consider when designing in vitro experiments for replacement discs.

The isotropic wear scars observed on the UHMWPE core were most probably because of rotation of the unconstrained core during operation37 which gave even wear characteristics in all directions. Lower Ra at the perimeter rim was indicative of burnishing where edge‐loading caused by the metallic endplates polished the perimeter portions of the core.15 There was no significant change in surface topography or appearance during the changed CoR test. Rim impingement observed in explanted devices38, 39, 40, 41 was not replicated under these conditions or when anterior shear displacement was added in a study by Vicars et al.16

The appearance of the SEM images (magnification 323X, Figure 7) shows similarity to an ex vivo UHMWPE component (Prodisc‐L) described by Choma et al.42 (page 293, Figure 8, right). This also displayed a similar “transfer effect,” perhaps also because of the same biomechanical reasons of small articulations and consequent debris reattachment. Conversely, an SEM image by Anderson at al.39 (page 111, Figure 1) of an UHMWPE explant did not indicate this phenomenon, but did have other similar features to those shown in the micrograph presented above (Figure 6, left) such as abrasive linear scratching. A similar pattern of raised roughening and “islands” of transferred debris was observed by Liao et al.43 when examining UHMWPE hips tested in 25% serum. The authors observed that the effect diminished when the serum concentration was 90%. The burnishing at the rim of the UHMWPE core was probably caused by an edge‐loading effect due to the adjacent CoCr bearing.15 Wear debris reattached to the pole area of the mobile bearing was indicative of a harsh tribological regime in which lubricant replenishment was reduced at the centre of the bearing couple lowering the rate of removal of the particulate debris into the bulk lubricating medium, in part due to smaller stroke lengths compared to similar diameter hip replacements where rotation inputs are much larger.

During this study, over a wide envelope of testing inputs, the Charité TDR rates of wear were approximately between 8 and 18 mm3/million cycles, which is a figure usually deemed acceptable for hip and knee replacements. However, the reaction to particulate wear debris in close proximity to the spinal canal, in a smaller joint domain, remains uncertain; reports of osteolysis have heightened the importance of this issue.20, 24, 25, 26 It remains to be seen if osteolysis will be a rare mode of failure, or, if these effects are merely in stasis at present. A recently published conference article on TDR wear debris27 reported a similarity to hip and knee particle morphology and is therefore a long‐term concern. Further work on biological reactivity of in vitro gathered lumbar TDR wear debris has been reported separately.44

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The CHARITÉ discs were provided by DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA Philip Hyde was supported by the EPSRC grant number EP/P504988/1. John Fisher is an NIHR senior investigator and supported through NIHR LMBRU Leeds Biomedical Musculoskeletal Research Unit. JF is a paid consultant to de Puy international a Johnson & Johnson company Professor Fisher and Professor Hall are supported through the Leeds Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering funded by the Wellcome Trust and EPSRC (WELMEC), grant number WT 088908/Z/09/Z. Adrian Eagles and Rachel Vicars are thanked for their advice on metrology and simulation respectively.

How to cite this article: Hyde PJ, Fisher J, Hall RM. 2017. Wear characteristics of an unconstrained lumbar total disc replacement under a range of in vitro test conditions. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2017:105B:46–52.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Buttner‐Janz K, Schellnack K, Zippel H. Biomechanics of the SB Charite lumbar intervertebral disc endoprosthesis. Int Orthopaed 1989;13(3):173–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Tandon PN, Jaggi S. Wear and lubrication in an artificial knee joint replacement. Int J Mech Sci 1981;23(7):413–422. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bell CJ, Walker PS, Sathasivam S, Blunn GW, Campbell PA. Differences in wear between fixed bearing and mobile bearing knees. J Biomech 1998. l;31:24. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fisher J, McEwen H, Tipper J, Jennings L, Farrar R, Stone M, Ingham E. Wear‐simulation analysis of rotating‐platform mobile‐bearing knees. Orthopedics 2006;29(9):S36–S41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Weightman B, Simon S, Paul I, Rose R, Radin E. Lubrication mechanisms of hip joint replacement prostheses. J Lubrication Technol 1972;4:131–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Willert HG, Semlitsch M. Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1977;11(2):157–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Boynton E, Waddell JP, Morton J, Gardiner GW. Aseptic loosening in total hip implants: The role of polyethylene wear debris. Can J Surg 1991;34(6):599–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Essner A, Schmidig G, Wang A. The clinical relevance of hip joint simulator testing: In vitro and in vivo comparisons. Wear 2005;259(7–12):882–886. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Galvin A, Brockett C, Williams S, Hatto P, Burton A, Isaac G, Stone M, Ingham E, Fisher J. Comparison of wear of ultra‐high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups against surface‐engineered femoral heads. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H—J Eng Med 2008;222(7):1073–1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Dowson D, Jobbins B. Design and development of a versatile hip joint simulator and a preliminary assessment of wear and creep in Charnley total replacement hip joints. Eng Med 1988;17(3):111–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Serhan HA, Dooris AP, Parsons ML, Ares PJ, Gabriel SM. In vitro wear assessment of the Charite Artificial Disc according to ASTM recommendations. Spine 2006;31(17):1900–1910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Grupp TM, Yue JJ, Garcia R, Jr., Basson J, Schwiesau J, Fritz B, Blomer W. Biotribological evaluation of artificial disc arthroplasty devices: Influence of loading and kinematic patterns during in vitro wear simulation. Eur Spine J 2009;18(1):98–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Goreham‐Voss CM, Hyde PJ, Hall RM, Fisher J, Brown TD. Cross‐shear implementation in sliding‐distance‐coupled finite element analysis of wear in metal‐on‐polyethylene total joint arthroplasty: Intervertebral total disc replacement as an illustrative application. J Biomech 2010;43(9):1674–1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Vicars R, Hyde PJ, Brown T, Tipper J, Ingham E, Fisher J, Hall RM. The effect of anterior–posterior shear load on the wear of ProDisc‐L TDR. Eur Spine J 2010;19(8):356–1362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hyde P, Vicars R, Fisher J, Hall R. Wear simulation of total disc arthroplasties: Sensitivity to device design and test parameters. J ASTM Int 2012;1535 STP:51–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vicars R, Prokopovich P, Brown TD, Tipper JL, Ingham E, Fisher J, Hall RM. The effect of anterior‐posterior shear on the wear of charite total disc replacement. Spine 2012;37(9):E528–E534. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823cbd6e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hall RM, Brown TD, Fisher J, Ingham E, Mendoza SA, Mayer HM. Introduction to lumbar total disc replacement: Factors that affect tribological performance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J—J Eng Tribol 2006;220(J8):775–786. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bisseling P, Zeilstra DJ, Hol AM, van Susante JL. Metal ion levels in patients with a lumbar metal‐on‐metal total disc replacement: Should we be concerned? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93(7):949–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Berry MR, Peterson BG, Alander DH. A granulomatous mass surrounding a maverick total disc replacement causing iliac vein occlusion and spinal stenosis: A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92(5):1242–1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Devin CJ, Myers TG, Kang JD. Chronic failure of a lumbar total disc replacement with osteolysis. Report of a case with nineteen‐year follow‐up. J Bone Joint Surg 2008;90(10):2230–2234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hallab NJ, Cunningham BW, Jacobs JJ. Spinal implant debris‐induced osteolysis. Spine 2003;28(20):S125–S138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Jacobs JJ, Hallab NJ. Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal‐on‐metal bearings: A local effect of metal hypersensitivity? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(6):1171–1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Punt I, Baxter R, van Ooij A, Willems P, van Rhijn L, Kurtz S, Steinbeck M. Submicron sized ultra‐high molecular weight polyethylene wear particle analysis from revised SB Charite III total disc replacements. Acta Biomater 2011;7(9):3404–3411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Punt IM, Cleutjens JPM, de Bruin T, Willems PC, Kurtz SM, van Rhijn LW, Schurink GWH, van Ooij A. Periprosthetic tissue reactions observed at revision of total intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Biomaterials 2009;30(11):2079–2084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. van Ooij A, Kurtz SM, Stessels F, Noten H, van Rhijn L. Polyethylene wear debris and long‐term clinical failure of the Charite disc prosthesis: A study of 4 patients.[erratum appears in Spine. 2007 Apr 20;32(9):1052]. Spine 2007;32(2):223–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kurtz SM, Steinbeck M, Ianuzzi A, van Ooij A, Punt IM, Isaza J, Ross ERS. Retrieval analysis of motion preserving spinal devices and periprosthetic tissues. SAS J 2009;3(4):161–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Tipper J, Hyder P, Brown T, Ingham E, Fisher J, Hall R. Quantitative Comparison of UHMWPE Wear Particles Generated from ProDisc‐L Total Disc Replacements Tested Under Altered Simulation Inputs. In: Orthopaedic Research Society, Annual Meeting. 2013: San Antonio, Texas.
  • 28. Pearcy MJ, Bogduk N. Instantaneous axes of rotation of the lumbar intervertebral joints. Spine 1988;13(9):1033–1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bogduk N. Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum. Philadelphia, USA: Elsevier Health Sciences. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Serhan H, Dooris A, Ares P, Gabriel S. 9:31143. Wear characterization of the Charité Artificial Disc using ASTM guidelines. Spine J 2005; 5(4, Supplement 1):S74–S74. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kang L, Galvin AL, Brown TD, Jin Z, Fisher J. Quantification of the effect of cross‐shear on the wear of conventional and highly cross‐linked UHMWPE. J Biomech 2008;41(2):340–346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Barbour PS, Barton DC, Fisher J. The influence of stress conditions on the wear of UHMWPE for total joint replacements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997;8(10):603–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Barbour PSM, Barton DC, Fisher J. The influence of contact stress on the wear of UHMWPE for total replacement hip prostheses. Wear 1995;181‐183(1):250–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Abdelgaied A, Liu F, Brockett C, Jennings L, Fisher J, Jin Z. Computational wear prediction of artificial knee joints based on a new wear law and formulation. J Biomech 2011;44(6):1108–1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bogduk N, Amevo B, Pearcy M. A biological basis for instantaneous centres of rotation of the vertebral column. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H—J Eng Med 1995;209(3):177–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Fisher J. A stratified approach to pre‐clinical tribological evaluation of joint replacements representing a wider range of clinical conditions advancing beyond the current standard. Faraday Discuss 2012;156(0):59–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Hyde PJ. Bio‐tribology of Total Disc Replacements of the Lumbar Spine, in Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering. 2012, University of Leeds: Leeds.
  • 38. Kurtz SM, van Ooij A, Ross R, de Waal Malefijt J, Peloza J, Ciccarelli L, Villarraga ML. Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty. Spine J 2007;7(1):12–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Anderson PA, Kurtz SM, Toth JM. Explant analysis of total disc replacement. Sem Spine Surg 2006;18(2):109–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kurtz SM, Peloza J, Siskey R, Villarraga ML. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component. Spine J 2005;5(3):344–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kurtz SM, Patwardhan A, MacDonald D, Ciccarelli L, Van Ooij A, Lorenz M, Zindrick M, O'Leary P, Isaza J, Ross R. What is the correlation of in vivo wear and damage patterns with in vitro TDR motion response? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(5):481–489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Choma TJ, Miranda J, Siskey R, Baxter R, Steinbeck MJ, Kurtz SM, Choma TJ, Choma TJ. Retrieval analysis of a ProDisc‐L total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009;22(4):290–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Liao YS, McNulty D, Hanes M. Wear rate and surface morphology of UHMWPE cups are affected by the serum lubricant concentration in a hip simulation test. Wear 2003;255(7–12):1051–1056. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Hyde PJ, Tipper J, Fisher J, Hall RM. Wear and biological effects of a semi‐constrained total disc replacement subject to modified ISO standard test conditions. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015;44(0):43–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES