Abstract
Tumor invasion into surrounding stromal tissue is a hallmark of high grade, metastatic cancers. Oncogenic transformation of human epithelial cells in culture can be triggered by activation of v-Src kinase, resulting in increased cell motility, invasiveness, and tumorigenicity and provides a valuable model for studying how changes in gene expression cause cancer phenotypes. Here, we show that epithelial cells transformed by activated Src show increased levels of DNA methylation and that the methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine (5-AzaC) potently blocks the increased cell motility and invasiveness induced by Src activation. A proteomic screen for chromatin regulators acting downstream of activated Src identified the replication-dependent histone chaperone CAF1 as an important factor for Src-mediated increased cell motility and invasion. We show that Src causes a 5-AzaC-sensitive decrease in both mRNA and protein levels of the p150 (CHAF1A) and p60 (CHAF1B), subunits of CAF1. Depletion of CAF1 in untransformed epithelial cells using siRNA was sufficient to recapitulate the increased motility and invasive phenotypes characteristic of transformed cells without activation of Src. Maintaining high levels of CAF1 by exogenous expression suppressed the increased cell motility and invasiveness phenotypes when Src was activated. These data identify a critical role of CAF1 in the dysregulation of cell invasion and motility phenotypes seen in transformed cells and also highlight an important role for epigenetic remodeling through DNA methylation for Src-mediated induction of cancer phenotypes.
Keywords: cancer biology, cell invasion, cell migration, chromatin, gene expression, proteomics, Src
Introduction
The viral Src oncogene (v-Src) is the prototypic tyrosine kinase and triggers cellular transformation and cancer malignancy in chicken cells upon Rous sarcoma virus infection (1, 2). Homologous Src family kinases encoded in the human genome are proto-oncogenes and frequently overactivated in human cancers, including breast cancer (3, 4), suggesting that high endogenous Src activity is important in regulating molecular mechanisms involved in carcinogenesis and/or cancer maintenance (5, 6). In human cells, overexpression of wild-type human Src family kinases typically does not increase tumorigenicity. In contrast, expression of the hyperactive v-Src kinase is sufficient to drive oncogenic transformation (7, 8), consistent with the idea that Src kinase activity, rather than simply Src kinase abundance, is associated with tumorigenicity. v-Src-mediated transformation produces hallmark characteristics of cancer, including anchorage-independent growth, increased cell invasiveness, tumor-initiating capacity when injected into immunocompromised nude mice (8–10), and metabolic reprogramming (11). In vivo, these phenotypes are associated with increased malignancy and metastatic potency, leading to increased clinical severity (12).
The MCF10A Src-ER cell line provides a model system to study the biochemical mechanisms of oncogenic transformation induced by Src activation. The MCF10A cell line is a spontaneously immortalized, non-cancerous human mammary epithelial cell line derived from the breast tissue of a patient with fibrocystic disease (13) that retains characteristics of primary cultures of breast epithelium. The MCF10A Src-ER line is a derivative that expresses an exogenous gene coding for Src-ER, a fusion protein with the ligand binding domain from estrogen receptor (ER)3 fused to the carboxyl terminus of v-Src (8). As illustrated in Fig. 1A, treatment of MCF10A Src-ER cells with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) activates Src-ER kinase through a conformational change followed by self-phosphorylation on Tyr416 (corresponding to Tyr419 in human Src), triggering phenotypic transformation. MCF10A Src-ER cells transformed with 4-OHT show phenotypes associated with metastatic tumors that are absent before Src activation (8, 14). Src activation results in global changes in mRNA and microRNA levels (8, 14), and activation of NF-κB and IL-6 signaling are important for cell transformation in this model (8, 15).
Here, we identify a novel role for the CAF1 complex in mediating specific phenotypes induced by v-Src activation that are characteristic of invasive, transformed cells. The CAF1 complex is part of the machinery maintaining chromatin structure in human cells (16). CAF1 is a histone chaperone that positions histone H3 and H4 dimers into nucleosomes on newly synthesized chromatin, especially during the S phase (17). It is a conserved heterotrimeric complex, comprising three essential protein subunits, i.e. p150, p60, and p48 (18), with homologs in yeast, insects, plants, and vertebrates (19, 20). Most recently, it has been reported that CAF1 is also important for maintaining differentiated cell states in mouse (21). This study showed that the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells was facilitated by depletion of CAF1.
We have compared chromatin-associated proteins in MCF10A Src-ER cells under basal conditions and after Src-mediated transformation. These data, together with additional functional analyses, reveal an unexpected dependence on DNA methylation and a critical role for human CAF1 in regulating specific oncogenic phenotypes caused by v-Src activation, including increased cell motility and invasiveness.
Results
v-Src-stimulated Cell Motility Is Dependent on DNA Methylation
First, we confirmed that active Src is required for increased motility and invasive phenotypes. Treatment of MCF10A Src-ER cells with 4-OHT increases the active, Tyr416-phosphorylated form of Src (Fig. 1B), disrupts the characteristic epithelial “cobblestone” cell morphology (Fig. 1C, top panels), increases actin filopodia (Fig. 1C, bottom panels), and increases cell invasiveness (Fig. 1, D and E). Treatment with 4-OHT did not cause similar phenotypic changes in the parental MCF10A cell line, which lacks Src-ER (data not shown). Also, transformation phenotypes were not observed in MCF10A Src-ER cells depleted of Src-ER with siRNA targeting ER before treatment with 4-OHT (Fig. 1F). The rapid phenotypic transformation observed is consistent with previous studies (8, 22). We conclude that phenotypic transformation of MCF10A Src-ER cells is dependent upon increased activity of v-Src kinase rather than indirect effects of 4-OHT treatment.
Src transformed epithelial cells proliferate slower than control cells (see below), albeit without changing the frequency of cells in the respective G1, S, and G2/M cell cycle phases (Fig. 1G). Cellular senescence can result from oncogene activation (23, 24). However, as judged using a β-galactosidase assay, the slowdown in proliferation of MCF10A cells following Src-mediated transformation was not accompanied by significant levels of cellular senescence. In contrast, etoposide treatment induced cellular senescence (Fig. 1H).
We next tested whether Src-induced phenotypes are affected by DNA methylation levels, which are important for gene silencing. Our aim was to investigate the potential role of epigenetic mechanisms in affecting the expression of genes required for the increased motility and invasiveness phenotypes caused by Src activation. MCF10A Src-ER cells were treated with a combination of vehicle, 4-OHT, and/or 5-AzaC, an irreversible inhibitor of DNA methyltransferases (3). Following treatment, the cells were assayed for both DNA methylation levels and cell invasiveness. The total levels of methylated cytidine increase after Src activation, as measured by DNA dot blot (Fig. 2A). The methylated cytidine signal was abolished after pretreatment of cells with 0.3 μm 5-AzaC for 24 h (Fig. 2A). Control, untransformed MCF10A cells treated with 5-AzaC alone exhibit little or no change in cell invasiveness under normal growth conditions (Fig. 2C). In contrast, preincubation with 5-AzaC markedly reduced levels of invasive cells following Src activation (Fig. 2 B and C), compared with cells preincubated with vehicle (DMSO) (Fig. 1, D and E), which cannot be explained simply by lower proliferation rates (Fig. 2D).
Remarkably, under these conditions cell invasiveness was almost completely suppressed and fell below the levels seen in control cells prior to Src activation. However, treatment of MCF10A Src-ER cells with 5-AzaC did not prevent phosphorylation of Src at Tyr416 (Fig. 2E). The 5-AzaC treatment also did not prevent the profound changes in cell morphology, including the characteristic disruption of the cobblestone epithelial pattern, seen after Src activation and cell transformation (Fig. 2F). We infer that Src activation modulates distinct downstream pathways that differentially control phenotypes associated with cell transformation and that DNA methylation influences mechanisms regulating the increase in cell motility and invasiveness in transformed cells.
Src-dependent Changes in the Chromatin Proteome
We hypothesized that the increase in motility and invasiveness in transformed cells may result from Src-induced repression of DNA methylation-dependent genes that suppress motility and invasion. To test this hypothesis, we examined changes in chromatin-associated proteins resulting from Src activation by a quantitative proteomics analysis (illustrated in Fig. 3A).
MCF10A Src-ER cells were grown in culture media containing either the normal (12C and 14N) isotopomers of arginine and lysine (“light” or R0K0), or else in medium with arginine and lysine substituted with heavy isotopes (“heavy” or R10K8). Heavy labeled cells were treated with 4-OHT for 48 h, whereas light labeled cells were treated with vehicle (ethanol) alone for 48 h, then 2 × 108 cells from each population were mixed, and a chromatin-enriched fraction was isolated from the mixed heavy and light-labeled cells. Chromatin enrichment was confirmed by immunoblotting for histone H3 (Fig. 3A, bottom panel). This SILAC analysis was carried out in biological triplicate and proteins in the chromatin fractions processed for LC-MS/MS analysis (see “Experimental Procedures” and Fig. 3). In total, 28,197 peptides were identified, and 2,020 proteins, each with two or more peptides, were quantitated from the isolated chromatin fractions. All of these raw MS data are accessible at ProteomeXchange (accession PXD005494). The processed and quantified data are also freely available in a user-friendly format in the Encyclopedia of Proteome Dynamics (5), an open access, searchable online database of large scale proteomic data sets.
This analysis identified specific proteins whose abundance was altered 48 h after Src activation, although the expression levels of most of the chromatin proteins detected showed little or no change (Fig. 3B). Within the transformation responsive proteins, we focused on those with GO annotations linked with nuclear localization and/or function (Fig. 3B) and excluded from further analysis proteins reported to artifactually co-fractionate with chromatin (25), such as cytoskeletal proteins. Proteins were deemed significantly changed if the following criteria were met: log2 SILAC ratio of less than −1 or log2 SILAC ratio of greater than 1, with a p value of less than 0.05. Proteins that meet the stringent cutoff and filtering criteria are shown in Table 1. After 48 h of Src activation, the levels of proteins p150, HLTF, UHRF1, MAFF, and CEBPD all decreased in the chromatin fraction, whereas JUNB increased (Fig. 3B and Table 1). qRT-PCR analyses of p150, HLTF, UHRF1, and MAFF mRNAs show parallel mRNA changes, indicating that the decreases in protein levels are likely transcriptionally regulated (Fig. 3C).
TABLE 1.
Protein IDs | Gene names | Descriptions | Log2 SILAC ratio | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Proteins down-regulated upon 4-OHT treatment | ||||
Q14527 | HLTF | Helicase-like transcription factor | −1.149 | 0.007 |
Q13111 | CHAF1A | Chromatin assembly factor 1 subunit p150 | −1.147 | 0.049 |
Q96T88 | UHRF1 | E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UHRF1 | −1.111 | 0.010 |
P78549 | NTHL1 | Endonuclease III-like protein 1 | −1.060 | 0.029 |
P98179 | RBM3 | Putative RNA-binding protein 3 | −1.052 | 0.034 |
Q9ULX9 | MAFF | Transcription factor MafF | −1.042 | 0.022 |
P49716 | CEBPD | CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein delta | −1.039 | 0.006 |
Q14676 | MDC1 | Mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein | −1.005 | 0.005 |
Proteins up-regulated upon 4-OHT treatment | ||||
P14618 | PKM2 | Pyruvate kinase isozymes M1/M2 | 1.376 | 0.023 |
P78371 | CCT2 | T-complex protein 1 subunit β | 1.186 | 0.031 |
P17275 | JUNB | Transcription factor jun-B | 1.113 | 0.006 |
p150 Depletion Stimulates Cell Motility
Next, we tested for causal links between protein abundance changes and the Src-induced transformed phenotypes by performing a focused phenotypic RNAi screen for genes where single siRNA depletion of expression leads to a phenotype. Independent depletion of either p150, HLTF, UHRF1, or MAFF in untransformed MCF10A Src-ER cells showed that depletion of either HLTF, UHRF1, or MAFF caused little or no change in cell morphology (data not shown). Note that these data do not exclude the possibility that HLTF, UHRF1, or MAFF gene functions contribute to affecting cell morphology but rather indicate that individual depletion did not induce a strong morphology phenotype. Interestingly, depletion of p150 alone did result in disruption of the typical regular epithelial morphology, resembling the morphological heterogeneity induced by Src activation (Figs. 1C and 4A). A similar morphological change was observed following siRNA knockdown of p150 with four separate siRNAs and using all four together in a pool (Fig. 4A), consistent with the phenotype resulting from depletion of p150 and suggesting it is unlikely to be an off target effect. These morphological changes following p150 depletion occurred without any change in either the abundance or the phosphorylation level of Src (Fig. 4B).
The proteomic data showing decreased p150 protein levels after Src activation were confirmed by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 4C). A corresponding decrease was detected in p150 mRNA, indicating that modulation of p150 protein levels by Src likely involves a transcriptional mechanism (Fig. 3C). p150/CHAF1A is a subunit of CAF1, an essential complex that recruits histones to nascent chromatin during the S phase (16). We next tested whether the CAF1 subunit p60/CHAF1B was similarly regulated by Src (Fig. 4, C and D). Levels of both p60 protein (Fig. 4C) and mRNA (Fig. 4D) decreased after Src-mediated transformation, similar to p150. Furthermore, the p150 and p60 CAF1 subunits remain associated in both control and Src-transformed cells, as judged by their co-immunoprecipitation (Fig. 4E). Thus, we conclude that Src-mediated transformation down-regulates CAF1 subunits, thereby reducing CAF1 levels and likely impairing CAF1 function.
To evaluate the role of CAF1 function in the inducible Src system, we first confirmed that depletion of p150 with siRNA co-depletes the p60 CAF1 subunit (Fig. 4B), as previously reported (7). Thus, siRNA depletion of p150 modulates levels of the CAF1 complex, allowing characterization of the phenotypic consequences of reduced CAF1 in untransformed MCF10A Src-ER cells. In the absence of Src induction, CAF1 depletion increases the frequency of MCF10A Src-ER cells in the S phase by ∼10%, compared with mock-depleted control cells (Fig. 4F), consistent with the histone recruitment function of CAF1 during replication (9, 10). We also analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy whether the organization of the actin cytoskeleton was affected by depleting CAF1 (Fig. 4G). In cells transfected with control siRNA, actin was predominantly in typical stress fibers. In CAF1-depleted cells, this pattern was disrupted and podia-like actin structures, which are often observed in motile cells, were detected (arrows in Fig. 4G), similar to what is observed following Src activation (Fig. 1C).
We next performed both wound healing and Transwell Matrigel invasion assays to assess the effect of CAF1 depletion. The wound healing assay compared the changes in the measured area of a wound, from the time of wounding to a fixed time after wounding, setting initial wound sizes to 100%. For control cells transfected with non-targeted siRNA, the wound size at 16 h after wounding was only reduced to 87.0 ± 4.9% (Fig. 5, A and B). In contrast, for CAF1-depleted cells, at 16 h after wounding, the wound size was reduced to 45.0 ± 7.3%. This indicates an increased sealing speed of cells at the wound area after CAF1 depletion (Fig. 5, A and B).
CAF1 depletion also increased invasiveness in untransformed cells without Src activation. The number of invading cells increased >5-fold after CAF1 depletion, compared with control cells transfected with non-targeted siRNA (Fig. 5, C and D). This is similar to transformed cells 48 h after Src activation (Fig. 1, D and E). We conclude that CAF1 levels are likely important for suppressing cell motility and invasiveness in untransformed MCF10A cells.
These changes in cell morphology and motility mirror phenotypic changes reported for the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), which was shown to play a role in cancer development (26). Therefore, we next examined the expression levels of EMT marker proteins, including E-cadherin, β-catenin, claudin, Snail, and Slug, following CAF1 depletion in untransformed cells (Fig. 5, E and F). This showed that the expression levels of some of these markers change in a fashion consistent with typical EMT, suggesting that CAF1 depletion leads to an EMT-like phenotype driven by Slug, claudin and potentially β-catenin (see “Discussion”).
High p150 Levels Suppress Motility in Src-transformed Cells
To investigate the potential role for CAF1 in mechanisms regulating motility and invasiveness, we exogenously expressed p150 ± Src activation and tested how this affected cellular phenotypes. To do this, MCF10A Src-ER cells were transduced with lentiviruses coding for either GFP alone or GFP-p150 and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 6). Free GFP was diffusely spread throughout the cells, with a strong cytoplasmic signal, whereas GFP-p150 showed nuclear localization and was expressed at similar levels to endogenous p150 (Fig. 6, A and B).
Lentivirus transduced cells expressing either GFP or GFP-p150 were treated for 48 h with either EtOH alone (control) or with 4-OHT (Fig. 6C) and assayed for cell invasiveness (Fig. 6D). Src activation in cells expressing GFP alone resulted in the expected increase in cell invasiveness, as compared with cells with basal Src activity (Fig. 6D). However, the cell invasiveness of Src-transformed cells expressing exogenous GFP-p150 was reduced by ∼50% compared with Src-transformed cells expressing GFP alone, whereas there was little or no difference in the low levels of cell invasion activity between untransformed MCF10A Src-ER cells expressing either GFP alone, or GFP-p150 (Fig. 6D). The fact that the Src-induced increase in cell invasiveness can be suppressed, at least in part, by preventing p150 protein levels decreasing strongly supports a role for CAF1 in mechanisms affecting cell motility in cells transformed by Src activation.
To investigate whether p150 levels also affected cell motility in other transformed cell types, we transduced U2OS cells, derived from human osteosarcoma, with lentiviruses coding for either GFP alone or GFP-p150 and assayed for cell migration (Fig. 6E). Migration by U2OS cells expressing exogenous GFP-p150 was reduced by ∼50% compared with U2OS cells expressing GFP alone (Fig. 6E). This is consistent with a broader role of p150 in the regulation of cell motility.
Regulation of p150 Levels
Next, we investigated the mechanism that couples Src activation with the down-regulation of CAF1 subunit mRNA and protein levels. Our experiments above show that the CAF1 subunit genes, p150 and p60, are both transcriptionally regulated by v-Src (Figs. 3C and 4D). Our hypothesis is that the increase we observed in DNA methylation upon Src activation may lead, either directly, or indirectly, to transcriptional repression of p150 and p60 gene expression. To test this, we preincubated MCF10A Src-ER cells with 5-AzaC, then treated cells with 4-OHT to induce Src activity and measured expression of the p150 and p60 genes. Interestingly, both the mRNA and protein levels of p150 and p60 remain similar to control, untransformed cells (Fig. 7, A and B). We conclude that 5-AzaC treatment prevents the Src-mediated decrease in p150 and p60 gene and protein expression and hence maintains CAF1 levels. This rescue of CAF1 expression by 5-AzaC treatment parallels the suppression of the Src-induced increase in cell motility and invasiveness by 5-AzaC shown previously (Fig. 2). Our data thus show that Src activation regulates expression of CAF1 subunits through a mechanism that is sensitive to 5-AzaC treatment, likely via modulation of DNA methylation levels.
Discussion
In this study we show that DNA methylation levels in human epithelial cells increase following Src-mediated oncogenic transformation and may affect genes regulating cancer cell phenotypes. This indicates a role for epigenetic gene silencing mechanisms in control of the increased cell motility and invasiveness resulting from Src activation. Using an unbiased, quantitative proteomics screen, we identified the chromatin assembly factor, CAF1, as having a key role in mechanisms promoting Src-induced transformed cell phenotypes, including increased invasiveness and motility. Reduction in the expression levels of CAF1 subunits appears necessary for promoting increased cell motility and invasiveness following oncogenic transformation. Exogenous expression of GFP-p150 from a lentiviral vector was sufficient to strongly reduce the ability of activated Src to promote increased cell motility and invasiveness. Interestingly, it also appears sufficient (at least in part), because targeted siRNA depletion of CAF1 subunits in untransformed cells caused similar increases in motility and invasiveness to that seen after Src activation.
In addition to the major effect of decreased CAF1 levels on stimulating cell motility and invasiveness, impairing CAF1 function also promoted other phenotypes seen in transformed cells after Src activation. This included changes in cell shape and morphology. The morphology of CAF1-depleted cells became elongated and fibroblast-like, consistent with either a Slug-driven (27) or a claudin-driven (28) EMT-like phenotype. Previous reports have shown that up-regulation of either Slug or claudin individually is sufficient to drive EMT. That we observe both Slug and claudin increasing after CAF1 depletion in untransformed cells suggests that Slug and/or claudin may promote an EMT-like transition in these cells. Fig. 7C illustrates a model linking these data on Src activation, CAF1 levels, and transformation phenotypes in epithelial cells. Our working hypothesis is that CAF1 regulates the expression of downstream target genes involved in the control of cell motility and migration, potentially including interactions with the extracellular matrix. An interesting goal for future experiments will be to address the mechanism of how Src activation regulates CAF1 protein levels.
Recent work in mice has shown that the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells, essentially a dedifferentiation process, was accelerated when CAF1 subunits were depleted (21). It was proposed that CAF1 regulates the transition state barrier between undifferentiated and differentiated cell states and can play a critical role, therefore, in maintaining specific differentiated cell types. For example, it was reported that depletion of CAF1 subunits in mouse enhanced, inter alia, the conversion of differentiated fibroblasts into neurons, with concomitant alterations to the previous fibroblast cell phenotypes (21). Our present findings, in a human disease model, are consistent with this proposed new role for the highly conserved CAF1 complex in maintaining terminally differentiated cell states. We show here that depletion of CAF1 levels in a human breast epithelial cell line changes the phenotypes normally associated with the terminally differentiated epithelial cell state, promoting a fibroblast-like cell morphology.
Our present data using the MCF10A cell model include several observations of potential clinical significance. First, the human homolog of the v-Src oncogene, Src, is of clinical relevance and Src activity and/or protein abundance is often highly elevated in breast cancer (29). The Src locus is mutated and/or amplified in some cancers, particularly intestinal cancers (40). Despite these associations with cancer malignancy, the efficacy of Src inhibitors in the clinic has been disappointing thus far. However, this could potentially be improved through better understanding of Src-dependent pathways that could be used for patient stratification. The DNA methylation inhibitor 5-AzaC, which we find to strongly inhibit the ability of Src activation to promote cell invasion and motility phenotypes, has been approved for clinical use and shown to have benefit as an anti-cancer drug for treatment of certain classes of leukemias (30, 31). Based upon our present findings, it could be important to test whether 5-AzaC might also show clinical benefit in reducing levels of metastases, associated either with breast cancer or other tumors, perhaps preferentially for patients previously showing elevated levels of Src activity or with altered expression of factors acting downstream of activated Src.
CAF1 has been shown to be a clinical marker for cell proliferation and associated with tumor aggressiveness and clinical outcome. However, the nature of the association depends on cancer type. For example, high levels of CAF1 marks proliferative cell populations in breast tissue (32), whereas reduced levels of p150 protein have been frequently observed in oral squamous cell carcinomas (33). Decreased p150 mRNA expression, which we found here to be a downstream effect of inducing Src activity in cell culture, was also detected in a study comparing gene expression profiles of stromal cells in normal versus breast cancer tissue, with both p150 and p60 mRNA levels significantly decreased in all grades of tumors tested (34). The contrasting associations between CAF1 and clinical outcome suggest that the role of CAF1 in tumorigenesis is complex and may be context-dependent, as suggested for other clinical markers (35); for example, depending on whether the cellular etiology of clinical severity is characterized by hyperplasia (proliferation) and/or dysplasia (differentiation). We note, however, that these data strongly support our findings here and other data indicating that human CAF1 functions as a regulator of global gene expression.
Our data indicating an important role for the human CAF1 complex in cell motility and invasion phenotypes, together with the recent report that CAF1 is critical for maintaining differentiated cell states in mouse (21), suggest that oncogenic transformation by Src and potentially also cell transformation by other oncogenes may be linked with creation of a meta-stable cell state and transdifferentiation. It will be interesting to address this possible link between stability of differentiated cell state and cancer progression in future studies. For example, a detailed characterization of the proteomic and gene expression landscapes of the normal, stably differentiated epithelial cell state and how this is changed in cell states associated with cancer may prove informative.
Experimental Procedures
Cell Culture
MCF10A Src-ER cells were grown as described previously (8). 293T and U2OS cells were grown in DMEM (Life Technologies), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mm l-glutamine (Life Technologies) at 37 °C in 5% CO2. For SILAC labeling, MCF10A Src-ER cells were grown for 7 days in arginine- and lysine-free F-12/DMEM (Thermo Fisher) supplemented with stable isotope-labeled arginine (R0 or R10) and lysine (K0 or K8) (CKGAS), dialyzed horse serum (Dundee Cell Products), and the same supplements as normal cell culture. The cells were treated with a final concentration of 1 μm tamoxifen (4-OHT; Sigma), for 48 h and 0.3 μm 5-AzaC (Sigma), 24 h prior to 4-OHT treatment.
Immunoblotting, DNA Dot Blot, and Immunoprecipitation
Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (5). Genomic DNA was extracted from cells using DNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Primary antibodies used for immunoblotting and DNA dot blot were anti-phospho-Src (Y419, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-α-tubulin (Sigma), anti-lamin B1 (Abcam), anti-histone H3 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p150 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p60 (Bethyl Laboratory), anti-GAPDH (Abcam), anti-E-cadherin (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-claudin (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-snail1 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-snail2 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-vimentin (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-GFP (Roche), and anti-methylcytidine (Abcam) antibodies. Immunoprecipitations were performed as previously described (36). In brief, whole cellular extracts were prepared in co-immunoprecipitation buffer (PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mm EDTA, 100 mm sodium orthovanadate, 0.25 mm PMSF, complete protease inhibitor (Roche)). After centrifugation, samples were quantified using the BCA method. The supernatants (1 mg protein) were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with 3 μg of anti-p150 antibody cross-linked to protein A/G-Dynabeads, following the manufacturer's instructions. The immunocomplexes were extensively washed with co-immunoprecipitation buffer, and the immunoprecipitates were subsequently eluted with 0.1 m citrate, pH 2.5, and boiled at 95 °C in Laemmli buffer. Precipitates and 5% of the whole lysate amount (input) were then used for Western blotting analysis. As a control, lysates were incubated with irrelevant cross-linked rabbit IgG.
Immunocytochemistry
The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at room temperature for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS at room temperature for 5 min and incubated with 5% FBS and 0.1% Tween in PBS on ice for 1 h. After blocking, the cells were incubated with primary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. The cells were then stained with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Life Technologies) and/or TRITC-conjugated phalloidin (Cell Signaling Technology) at room temperature for 1 h and with DAPI (Sigma) at room temperature for 10 min. Images were captured with a DeltaVision Core Restoration microscope (Applied Precision).
Cell Invasion and Migration Assay
48 h after either 4-OHT treatment or 72 h after siRNA treatment, assays were performed as previously described (8).
Cell Cycle Analysis
Cellular DNA content profiles were analyzed as previously described (37).
β-Galactosidase Staining
Cellular senescence was evaluated by β-galactosidase staining using the senescence β-galactosidase staining kit (Cell Signaling Technology) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cells were treated with a final concentration of 20 μm etoposide for 1 h.
Subcellular Fractionation
Approximately 2 × 108 cells were detached with Accutase (Life Technologies), washed with PBS once and resuspended in 5 ml of buffer A (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mm KCl, 3 mm MgCl2, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol), followed by incubation on ice for 10 min. For SILAC experiments, equal numbers of cells from R0K0 and R10K8 media were mixed prior to resuspension in buffer A. The cells were mechanically homogenized using a needle and centrifuged at 1,000 × g at 4 °C for 5 min. The pellets were resuspended in 3 ml of S1 solution (0.25 m sucrose, 10 mm MgCl2), layered on 3 ml of S2 solution (0.35 m sucrose, 0.5 mm MgCl2), and centrifuged at 1,430 × g at 4 °C for 5 min. The pellets were resuspended in 3 ml of S2 solution and sonicated to disrupt nuclear membranes. Lysates were layered on S3 solution (0.88 m sucrose, 0.5 mm MgCl2) and centrifuged at 3,000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min. Supernatants were mixed with NPRB (20 mm HEPES, pH 7.4, 7.5 mm MgCl2, 30 mm NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 m urea at final concentration) and centrifuged at 13,000 × g at 4 °C for 5 min. The pellets were resuspended in ChRB (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mm EDTA, 1% SDS) and completely sonicated. Lysates were boiled at 95 °C for 20 min. After centrifugation at 13,000 × g at room temperature for 5 min, supernatants were collected and used as chromatin fractions.
In-gel Trypsin Digestion and Peptide Desalting
Proteins from chromatin fractions were subjected to in-gel trypsin digestion as previously described (5).
LC-MS/MS and Analysis and Data Processing
For tryptic digests, including tryptic + Lys-C double digests, peptide chromatography was performed using a Dionex RSLCnano HPLC, as described previously (38). The data were processed, searched, and quantified using the MaxQuant software package version 1.2.0.18 (39), using the default settings and employing the human UniProt database (June 7, 2011) containing 109,824 entries. Default mass tolerances were used and maximum false positive rates of 1% were allowed for both peptide and protein identification. Protein quantitation data were derived from a minimum of two peptides/protein. MS data were normalized and visualized using Perseus and Datashop.
qRT-PCR Analysis
Total RNA was extracted with RNeasy kit (Qiagen). Quantification of mRNA was performed with Light cycler 450 (Roche), using QuantiFast SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's protocol.
siRNA Transfection
The cells were transfected with siRNAs using Lipofectamine RNAiMax (Life Technology) at 20 nm final siRNA concentration, according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cells were harvested and analyzed 72 h after siRNA transfection. The control siRNA sequence is 5′-CAGUCGCGUUUGCGACUGG-3′ (MWG). siRNAs utilized pools of four different sequences (Thermo Fisher): LU-003402 (ER), LU-019938 (p150), LU-019937 (p60).
Imaging of Cell Morphology and Wound Healing Assay
Light microscopy images of cells were recorded either 48 h after 4-OHT treatment or 72 h after siRNA transfection. The wound healing assays were performed as previously described (14). Images of cell wounds were taken at 0 and 16 h after wounding. Opened wound sizes were measured by using TScratch software.
Expression Constructs and Lentivirus Transduction
Human cDNAs for p150 were obtained from Thermo Fisher. The coding sequence for p150 was amplified by PCR from a cDNA template and cloned into pEGFP-C1 (Clontech). To generate pLVX-GFP and pLVX-GFP-p150, the corresponding sequences were amplified by PCR from constructs described above and cloned into pLVX-puro vector (Clontech). For lentivirus production, we triple-transfected 293T cells with two plasmids encoding essential genes for lentivirus (gifts from Ron Hay lab, University of Dundee) and either pLVX-GFP, or pLVX-GFP-p150, by the calcium phosphate transfection method. 16 h after transfection, the medium was replenished. 72 h after transfection, supernatants containing lentiviruses were filtered and concentrated. Lentiviruses were used to transduce cells in the presence of 8 μg/ml Polybrene (Millipore).
Author Contributions
A. E. and A. I. L. designed the experiments. A. E., T. L., and R. P. carried out the experiments. A. E., T. L., R. P., D. B., A. N., and A. I. L. analyzed the data. A. E., T. L., and A. I. L. wrote the paper.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ron Hay (University of Dundee) for the generous gifts of plasmids for lentivirus generation. We thank Kevin Struhl (Harvard Medical School) for the generous gifts of MCF10A Src-ER cells. We thank our colleagues in the Lamond group for advice and discussion. We thank staff in the Fingerprints Mass Spectrometry Service and the Centre for Advanced Scientific Technologies for advice and assistance (University of Dundee).
This work was supported by Wellcome Trust Grants 073980/Z/03/Z, 105024/Z/14/Z, 098503/E/12/Z, and BB/K003801/1 (to A. I. L.), Seventh Framework Programme Grant HEALTH-F4–2010-257082 (to A. I. L.), and Gene Regulation and Expression Strategic Award 097945/B/11/Z. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
- ER
- estrogen receptor
- 5-AzaC
- 5-azacytidine
- 4-OHT
- 4-hydroxytamoxifen
- EMT
- epithelial to mesenchymal transition
- qRT-PCR
- quantitative RT-PCR
- TRITC
- tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate.
References
- 1. Wang E., and Goldberg A. R. (1976) Changes in microfilament organization and surface topogrophy upon transformation of chick embryo fibroblasts with Rous sarcoma virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 4065–4069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hunter T. (2015) Discovering the first tyrosine kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7877–7882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Santi D. V., Garrett C. E., and Barr P. J. (1983) On the mechanism of inhibition of DNA-cytosine methyltransferases by cytosine analogs. Cell 33, 9–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Elsberger B. (2014) Translational evidence on the role of Src kinase and activated Src kinase in invasive breast cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 89, 343–351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Larance M., Ahmad Y., Kirkwood K. J., Ly T., and Lamond A. I. (2013) Global subcellular characterization of protein degradation using quantitative proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12, 638–650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Jove R., and Hanafusa H. (1987) Cell Transformation by the Viral srcOncogene. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 3, 31–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hoek M., and Stillman B. (2003) Chromatin assembly factor 1 is essential and couples chromatin assembly to DNA replication in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 12183–12188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Iliopoulos D., Hirsch H. A., and Struhl K. (2009) An epigenetic switch involving NF-κB, Lin28, Let-7 microRNA, and IL6 links inflammation to cell transformation. Cell 139, 693–706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Poleshko A., Einarson M. B., Shalginskikh N., Zhang R., Adams P. D., Skalka A. M., and Katz R. A. (2010) Identification of a functional network of human epigenetic silencing factors. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 422–433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Shibahara K., and Stillman B. (1999) Replication-dependent marking of DNA by PCNA facilitates CAF-1-coupled inheritance of chromatin. Cell 96, 575–585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hart P. C., Ratti B. A., Mao M., Ansenberger-Fricano K., Shajahan-Haq A. N., Tyner A. L., Minshall R. D., and Bonini M. G. (2016) Caveolin-1 regulates cancer cell metabolism via scavenging Nrf2 and suppressing MnSOD-driven glycolysis. Oncotarget 7, 308–322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Heimann R., and Hellman S. (2000) Individual characterisation of the metastatic capacity of human breast carcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer 36, 1631–1639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Soule H. D., Maloney T. M., Wolman S. R., Peterson W. D. Jr., Brenz R., McGrath C. M., Russo J., Pauley R. J., Jones R. F., and Brooks S. C. (1990) Isolation and characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human breast epithelial cell line, MCF-10. Cancer Res. 50, 6075–6086 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hirsch H. A., Iliopoulos D., Tsichlis P. N., and Struhl K. (2009) Metformin selectively targets cancer stem cells, and acts together with chemotherapy to block tumor growth and prolong remission. Cancer Res. 69, 7507–7511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Iliopoulos D., Jaeger S. A., Hirsch H. A., Bulyk M. L., and Struhl K. (2010) STAT3 activation of miR-21 and miR-181b-1 via PTEN and CYLD are part of the epigenetic switch linking inflammation to cancer. Mol. Cell 39, 493–506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kaufman P. D., Kobayashi R., Kessler N., and Stillman B. (1995) The p150 and p60 subunits of chromatin assembly factor I: a molecular link between newly synthesized histones and DNA replication. Cell 81, 1105–1114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Tagami H., Ray-Gallet D., Almouzni G., and Nakatani Y. (2004) Histone H3.1 and H3.3 complexes mediate nucleosome assembly pathways dependent or independent of DNA synthesis. Cell 116, 51–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Verreault A., Kaufman P. D., Kobayashi R., and Stillman B. (1996) Nucleosome assembly by a complex of CAF-1 and acetylated histones H3/H4. Cell 87, 95–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Exner V., Taranto P., Schönrock N., Gruissem W., and Hennig L. (2006) Chromatin assembly factor CAF-1 is required for cellular differentiation during plant development. Development 133, 4163–4172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ridgway P., and Almouzni G. (2000) CAF-1 and the inheritance of chromatin states: at the crossroads of DNA replication and repair. J. Cell Sci. 113, 2647–2658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cheloufi S., Elling U., Hopfgartner B., Jung Y. L., Murn J., Ninova M., Hubmann M., Badeaux A. I., EuongAng C., Tenen D., Wesche D. J., Abazova N., Hogue M., Tasdemir N., Brumbaugh J., et al. (2015) The histone chaperone CAF-1 safeguards somatic cell identity. Nature 528, 218–224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hirsch H. A., Iliopoulos D., Joshi A., Zhang Y., Jaeger S. A., Bulyk M., Tsichlis P. N., Shirley Liu X., and Struhl K. (2010) A transcriptional signature and common gene networks link cancer with lipid metabolism and diverse human diseases. Cancer Cell 17, 348–361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhu J., Woods D., McMahon M., and Bishop J. M. (1998) Senescence of human fibroblasts induced by oncogenic Raf. Genes Dev. 12, 2997–3007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Bartkova J., Rezaei N., Liontos M., Karakaidos P., Kletsas D., Issaeva N., Vassiliou L.-V. F., Kolettas E., Niforou K., Zoumpourlis V. C., Takaoka M., Nakagawa H., Tort F., Fugger K., Johansson F., et al. (2006) Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature 444, 633–637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kustatscher G., Wills K. L., Furlan C., and Rappsilber J. (2014) Chromatin enrichment for proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2090–2099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kalluri R., and Weinberg R. A. (2009) The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 1420–1428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Medici D., Hay E. D., and Olsen B. R. (2008) Snail and Slug promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition through β-catenin-T-cell factor-4-dependent expression of transforming growth factor-β3. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 4875–4887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Suh Y., Yoon C.-H., Kim R.-K., Lim E.-J., Oh Y. S., Hwang S.-G., An S., Yoon G., Gye M. C., Yi J.-M., Kim M.-J., and Lee S.-J. (2013) Claudin-1 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition through activation of the c-Abl-ERK signaling pathway in human liver cells. Oncogene 32, 4873–4882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ottenhoff-Kalff A. E., Rijksen G., van Beurden E. A., Hennipman A., Michels A. A., and Staal G. E. (1992) Characterization of protein tyrosine kinases from human breast cancer: involvement of the c-src oncogene product. Cancer Res. 52, 4773–4778 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Santini V., Kantarjian H. M., and Issa J. P. (2001) Changes in DNA methylation in neoplasia: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications. Ann. Intern. Med. 134, 573–586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sorm F., Pískala A., Cihák A., and Veselý J. (1964) 5-Azacytidine, a new, highly effective cancerostatic. Experientia 20, 202–203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Polo S. E., Theocharis S. E., Klijanienko J., Savignoni A., Asselain B., Vielh P., and Almouzni G. (2004) Chromatin assembly factor-1, a marker of clinical value to distinguish quiescent from proliferating cells. Cancer Res. 64, 2371–2381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Staibano S., Mignogna C., Lo Muzio L., Mascolo M., Salvatore G., Di Benedetto M., Califano L., Rubini C., and De Rosa G. (2007) Chromatin assembly factor-1 (CAF-1)-mediated regulation of cell proliferation and DNA repair: a link with the biological behaviour of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue? Histopathology 50, 911–919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Finak G., Bertos N., Pepin F., Sadekova S., Souleimanova M., Zhao H., Chen H., Omeroglu G., Meterissian S., Omeroglu A., Hallett M., and Park M. (2008) Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nat. Med. 14, 518–527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Petty R. D., Kerr K. M., Murray G. I., Nicolson M. C., Rooney P. H., Bissett D., and Collie-Duguid E. S. (2006) Tumor transcriptome reveals the predictive and prognostic impact of lysosomal protease inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 1729–1744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Pippa R., Dominguez A., Malumbres R., Endo A., Arriazu E., Marcotegui N., Guruceaga E., and Odero M. D. (June 6, 2016) MYC-dependent recruitment of RUNX1 and GATA2 on the SET oncogene promoter enhances PP2A inactivation in acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotarget 5, 10.18632/oncotarget.9840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ly T., Endo A., and Lamond A. I. (2015) Proteomic analysis of the response to cell cycle arrests in human myeloid leukemia cells. eLife 4, e04534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ly T., Ahmad Y., Shlien A., Soroka D., Mills A., Emanuele M. J., Stratton M. R., and Lamond A. I. (2014) A proteomic chronology of gene expression through the cell cycle in human myeloid leukemia cells. eLife 3, e01630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Cox J., and Mann M. (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bamford S., Dawson E., Forbes S., Clements J., Pettett R., Dogan A., Flanagan A., Teague J., Futreal P. A., Stratton M. R., and Wooster R. (2004) The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database and website. Br. J. Cancer 91, 355–358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]